SYSTEM ANALYZER

Rate My PC: AMD Ryzen AI Max PRO 385 + AMD Radeon 780M

Get a comprehensive performance analysis of your gaming rig with detailed benchmarks, bottleneck detection, and upgrade recommendations

Build Configuration

Select your components

PROCESSOR (CPU)

▼

GRAPHICS CARD (GPU)

▼

91 Score

Top 9% Ranking

91 / 100

ULTIMATE READY

Apex Performer

Top 9% of systems. Capable of 4K Ultra gaming and advanced rendering.

4K 60+ FPSVR ReadyRay Tracing

System Balance Analysis

CPU vs GPU performance ratio

Well Balanced

CPU

93%

GPU

90%

PROCESSOR

AMD Ryzen AI Max PRO 385

43,326 Benchmark Score

Top 7% Market Ranking

View Full Specs →

GRAPHICS CARD

AMD Radeon 780M

17,588 Benchmark Score

Top 10% Market Ranking

View Full Specs →

Market Position

How your build compares to others

Budget

0-30

Mid-Range

30-60

High-End

60-85

Enthusiast

85-100

Your Build

Game Performance Benchmarks

Real-world 4K FPS in popular titles

View All Games →

Performance Insights

Tips to maximize your system

Optimal Performance

Your system is in the top tier. You can run any modern game at maximum settings.

4K Gaming Ready

Consider a 4K 144Hz monitor to fully utilize your hardware capabilities.

Compatible Games See what you can play Compare CPUs Find upgrades Compare GPUs Find upgrades

Performance Tiers Explained

90-100

Ultimate

4K Ultra gaming, VR ready, ray tracing enabled, professional workloads

4K 60+ FPS VR Ready

70-89

High-End

1440p Ultra or 4K High settings, excellent for modern AAA titles

1440p Ultra 4K High

50-69

Mid-Range

1080p Ultra or 1440p Medium, great value for most gamers

1080p Ultra 1440p Med

30-49

Entry Level

1080p Medium settings, suitable for eSports and older titles

1080p Med eSports

0-29

Legacy

Basic gaming, older titles, consider upgrading for modern games

720p-1080p Low Older Games

The AMD Ryzen AI Max PRO 385 pairs an 8-core Zen 5 processor with a Radeon 780M integrated GPU in a laptop-class build. This combination targets the upper-middle tier of mobile computing, with the CPU ranking in the 88th percentile among all processors and the GPU in the 61st percentile among all GPUs. The data shows a system designed for demanding multi-threaded productivity and capable light-to-moderate gaming, rather than a dedicated high-end gaming rig.

CPU Analysis

The CPU is built on the Zen 5 architecture, codenamed Strix Halo, manufactured on a 4 nm process at TSMC. It features 8 cores and 16 threads, with a base clock of 3.60 GHz and a boost clock of 5.00 GHz. The thermal design power (TDP) is rated at 55 W, which is typical for a high-performance mobile processor. Cache is organized as 80 KB of L1 per core, 1 MB of L2 per core, and a shared 32 MB of L3 cache. This cache hierarchy, combined with the high boost clock, yields strong single-threaded performance.

Benchmark results confirm the processor’s capability. In Cinebench R23, it scores 28424 points in multi-core and 4012 points in single-core. The single-core score of 4012 indicates excellent responsiveness for everyday tasks and lightly-threaded applications. The multi-core score of 28424 highlights substantial parallel processing power, placing it comfortably ahead of many desktop processors from a few generations ago. The PassMark multi-thread score of 32075 and integer math score of 105056 reinforce this, showing strong performance in CPU-intensive workloads like compilation, rendering, and data processing. Data encryption scores of 18978 and compression scores of 379448 further indicate robust throughput for security-related and archiving tasks.

Compared to its nearest rivals, the Ryzen AI Max PRO 385 is virtually tied with the AMD Ryzen AI 9 465, showing a delta of -0.2%. It is 0.3% ahead of the Intel Core Ultra 9 386H, 0.8% behind the AMD Ryzen 7 170, and 0.9% behind the AMD Ryzen 7 PRO 7745. These minuscule deltas mean that in real-world use, the choice between these processors will come down to platform features and power efficiency rather than raw compute. The average benchmark score of 43326 places it in the 88th percentile, meaning it outperforms the vast majority of CPUs on the market.

Benchmark Performance

The CPU’s average benchmark score is 43326, which puts it in the 88th percentile of all CPUs. This is a high placement, indicating that the processor is suitable for demanding professional workloads. The GPU’s average benchmark score is 17588, placing it in the 61st percentile of all GPUs. This is a mid-range placement, indicating that the integrated graphics can handle modern games at lower settings and resolutions, but will struggle with high-end graphical demands.

Specific GPU scores include a 3DMark Steel Nomad DX12 score of 480, a Geekbench OpenCL score of 18602, and a Geekbench Vulkan score of 33683. The Vulkan score is notably higher than the OpenCL score, suggesting better performance in APIs that are commonly used in gaming. The GPU is nearly identical in performance to the AMD Radeon Pro 560 (0.2% ahead), the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 (0.3% behind), the AMD Radeon HD 7790 (0.4% behind), and the AMD Radeon Pro 460 (0.5% ahead). This places the 780M in a strange position: it is an integrated GPU that performs similarly to some older entry-level discrete GPUs.

The combined picture is one of a system with a processor that is significantly more powerful than its graphics solution. The CPU is in the 88th percentile, while the GPU is in the 61st percentile. This imbalance suggests that the system is designed for tasks where CPU power is paramount, such as software development, video editing, and 3D rendering (where the CPU does the heavy lifting), rather than for high-FPS gaming where the GPU would be the limiting factor.

Upgrade Path and Platform

The processor uses the AMD Socket FP11, which is a mobile-specific socket. This means the CPU is soldered to the motherboard and is not upgradeable in the traditional sense. The platform supports LPDDR5X memory running in a quad-channel configuration, providing a substantial memory bandwidth of 256.0 GB/s. This high bandwidth is critical for the integrated GPU, which relies on system memory for its frame buffer. ECC memory is supported, which is a plus for workstation-class reliability.

The CPU provides PCIe Gen 4 with 16 lanes. This is sufficient for a high-speed NVMe SSD and a discrete GPU, though the system’s laptop class and integrated graphics mean that a discrete GPU upgrade is unlikely. The integrated graphics is a Radeon 8050S, which is listed as part of the CPU’s specifications, though the primary GPU in this analysis is the Radeon 780M. The GPU’s TDP is a mere 15 W, which is exceptionally low. This low power draw, combined with the CPU’s 55 W TDP, means that the system’s power supply requirements are modest.

The data includes no suggested PSU wattage, but the combined TDP of 70 W indicates that a standard laptop power brick is sufficient. The upgrade path for this platform is essentially limited to increasing system memory or storage. A sensible next upgrade would be to ensure the system has ample LPDDR5X memory, as this will directly benefit both the CPU and the integrated GPU’s performance. There is no option to upgrade the processor or the graphics chip.

Balance and Bottleneck

The data clearly indicates a CPU-bound system. The CPU’s 88th percentile standing versus the GPU’s 61st percentile creates a significant performance gap. In most gaming scenarios, the Radeon 780M will be the limiting factor, preventing the CPU from reaching its full potential. For example, while the CPU can handle complex game logic and physics calculations with ease, the GPU will bottleneck the frame rate at higher resolutions or graphical settings.

Conversely, in CPU-intensive tasks like video encoding, 3D rendering, or code compilation, the GPU plays a minimal role, and the system will perform at a level consistent with the CPU’s high percentile ranking. The PassMark physics score of 1711 is relatively low, suggesting that the CPU’s performance in specific physics simulations may not be as strong as its general multi-threaded scores imply. However, this is a niche workload. The FPS scaling, when estimated from the benchmark scores, will show that lowering resolution or graphical settings will yield diminishing returns once the GPU is no longer the bottleneck, as the CPU’s performance ceiling is much higher.

The GPU’s 61st percentile ranking means it will struggle to maintain high frame rates at 1080p with ultra settings in modern titles. The system is best balanced for 1080p gaming at medium settings, or for esports titles where the graphical load is light. For any workload that does not heavily utilize the GPU, the system will feel exceptionally fast due to the powerful CPU.

GPU Analysis

The AMD Radeon 780M is an integrated GPU based on the RDNA 3.0 architecture, built on the same 4 nm process as the CPU. It features 768 shading units, 48 texture mapping units, and 32 raster operation units. The GPU has 12 ray tracing cores, which provides hardware support for ray-traced effects, a feature not common in integrated graphics. The boost clock is 2900 MHz, with a base clock of 800 MHz.

Memory is system-shared, with the size, type, and bus width all listed as "System Shared". This means the GPU uses a portion of the system’s LPDDR5X memory, and the bandwidth is system-dependent. The high 256.0 GB/s system memory bandwidth is a key advantage here, as it mitigates one of the main weaknesses of integrated graphics. The GPU’s pixel rate is 92.80 GPixel/s, and its texture rate is 139.2 GTexel/s. It delivers 8.909 TFLOPS of FP32 performance, which is a measure of its raw compute capability.

Benchmark results show the GPU scores 480 in 3DMark Steel Nomad DX12, 18602 in Geekbench OpenCL, and 33683 in Geekbench Vulkan. These scores indicate that the GPU is suitable for entry-level 1080p gaming and can handle light creative workloads like photo editing. The 12 RT cores allow for ray tracing to be enabled in supported games, but the performance will be low due to the overall modest compute power. For rendering tasks that use the GPU, the 8.909 TFLOPS is a decent amount of power, but it is far below what a dedicated mid-range or high-end discrete GPU would offer.

Usage Scenarios

High-Refresh Gaming: This system is not suited for high-refresh gaming. The GPU’s 61st percentile ranking and 3DMark score of 480 indicate that frame rates will be low at high settings. While the CPU is powerful, the GPU will bottleneck performance, making high-refresh (144Hz+) gaming unrealistic outside of very light esports titles at low settings.

Streaming: The CPU’s strong multi-core scores (28424 in Cinebench R23) are excellent for software-based video encoding. The 8 cores and 16 threads can handle encoding and gaming simultaneously, though the GPU will limit the gaming experience. The system is capable of streaming, but the game quality will be constrained by the GPU.

Video Editing: This is a strong scenario. The CPU’s high multi-threaded performance will accelerate timeline rendering and effect processing. The 256.0 GB/s memory bandwidth is beneficial for handling large video files. The GPU can assist with some effects, but the CPU will do the heavy lifting. The system is well-suited for 1080p and even some 4K editing workflows.

3D Rendering: Similar to video editing, the CPU is the star here. A Cinebench R23 multi-core score of 28424 is competitive for rendering tasks. Software that utilizes CPU rendering will perform excellently. GPU-accelerated rendering will be slower due to the 780M’s limited compute power (8.909 TFLOPS), but it is an option for less complex scenes.

Software Development: The CPU’s high integer math score (105056) and data compression score (379448) are indicative of strong performance in code compilation and data processing. The 88th percentile CPU ranking means that builds will be fast. The system is an excellent choice for developers.

Student and Office Work: This system is overkill for basic tasks like word processing and spreadsheets. However, the high single-core score (4012 in Cinebench R23) ensures that the system will feel instantaneously responsive. The portability of a laptop with this power is a benefit for students who also do some light gaming or creative work.

Who Should Build It

This build targets a specific user: the professional or student who needs top-tier CPU performance in a laptop form factor, but whose graphical demands are modest. The CPU’s 88th percentile ranking makes it ideal for content creators, software developers, and engineers who work with CPU-intensive applications like compilers, 3D modeling software, and data analysis tools. The high memory bandwidth (256.0 GB/s) is a boon for these tasks.

Gamers who primarily play at 1080p with medium settings, or who focus on esports titles, will find the system adequate. The GPU’s performance, while not spectacular, is sufficient for these scenarios. It is not suitable for gamers who want to play the latest AAA titles at high settings or high resolutions.

Small business workstations that require heavy number-crunching for financial modeling or scientific computing would benefit from the CPU’s power. The ECC memory support adds a layer of reliability for long-running computations. Students in STEM fields who need to run simulations or compile code will also find this to be a capable machine, provided they do not also require high-end gaming performance.

FAQ

Q: What is the CPU’s single-core performance?

A: The CPU scores 4012 points in the Cinebench R23 single-core test and 3995 points in the PassMark single-thread test, indicating excellent responsiveness for everyday tasks.

Q: How much memory bandwidth does the platform support?

A: The platform supports quad-channel LPDDR5X memory with a total bandwidth of 256.0 GB/s, which is shared between the CPU and the integrated GPU.

Q: Does the GPU support ray tracing?

A: Yes, the AMD Radeon 780M is equipped with 12 ray tracing cores, providing hardware support for ray-traced effects in supported games.

Q: How does the CPU compare to the AMD Ryzen AI 9 465?

A: The AMD Ryzen AI Max PRO 385 has an average benchmark score of 43326, which is 0.2% lower than the AMD Ryzen AI 9 465’s score of 43431.

Q: What is the total TDP for the processor?

A: The processor has a TDP of 55 W, while the integrated GPU has a TDP of 15 W.

Q: Is the CPU overclockable?

A: No, the multiplier is locked (multiplierUnlocked is false), so the CPU cannot be overclocked.

Q: What is the process node for the CPU and GPU?

A: Both the CPU (Zen 5) and the GPU (RDNA 3.0) are manufactured on a 4 nm process at TSMC.

Gaming Performance

No measured FPS data exists for this exact CPU+GPU combination. The FACT PACK contains no measured FPS rows. Therefore, all FPS figures discussed here are estimates based on the benchmark scores. The GPU’s average benchmark score of 17588 places it in the 61st percentile, which is a clear indicator of its performance class. Based on the GPU’s 3DMark Steel Nomad score of 480 and its 8.909 TFLOPS of FP32 compute power, frame rates can be estimated.

In modern AAA titles at 1080p with ultra settings, the system will likely struggle to maintain 30 FPS. The GPU’s performance is comparable to an NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 (which is only 0.3% faster in average score), but this is a misleading comparison because the RTX 4060 is a dedicated desktop card. The 780M’s performance is more in line with older entry-level discrete GPUs. For esports titles like Counter-Strike 2 or Valorant, the system should be able to achieve 60-100 FPS at 1080p with medium-to-high settings, thanks to the powerful CPU. At 720p, the system will be able to push higher frame rates, but the experience will still be limited by the GPU’s raw rendering power. Users should expect to lower settings to "low" or "medium" for a playable experience in recent games.

Build Overview

This is a laptop-class build (buildClass: "laptop") that pairs the AMD Ryzen AI Max PRO 385 processor with the AMD Radeon 780M integrated GPU. The combined percentile ranking is 75, which places it in the upper-middle tier of all system configurations. The defining characteristic is a massive asymmetry: the CPU is a top-tier performer (88th percentile), while the GPU is a mid-range component (61st percentile).

This is a productivity-first machine. It is designed for users who need serious compute power for work, study, or content creation, and who are willing to accept the integrated GPU’s limitations for gaming. The system’s overall tier is high for CPU-bound tasks, but it is firmly in the "entry-level gaming" or "mainstream productivity" tier for gaming performance. The pairing represents a strategic choice to maximize multi-threaded throughput and memory bandwidth within a 70 W combined TDP envelope, making it a highly efficient solution for a mobile workstation.

Rate My PC: AMD Ryzen AI Max PRO 385 + AMD Radeon 780M

Apex Performer

System Balance Analysis

AMD Ryzen AI Max PRO 385

AMD Radeon 780M

Market Position

Game Performance Benchmarks

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

Performance Insights

Optimal Performance

4K Gaming Ready

Performance Tiers Explained

Ultimate

High-End

Mid-Range

Entry Level

Legacy

CPU Analysis

Benchmark Performance

Upgrade Path and Platform

Balance and Bottleneck

GPU Analysis

Usage Scenarios

Who Should Build It

FAQ

Gaming Performance

Build Overview

4K Gaming Performance

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

1440p Gaming Performance

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

1080p Gaming Performance

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

Related Processors

Related Graphics Cards

Compare Your CPU

Compare Your GPU

Related PC Builds

Same CPU with Different GPUs

Same GPU with Different CPUs

Other Popular Builds