SYSTEM ANALYZER

Rate My PC: AMD Ryzen AI Max PRO 385 + AMD Radeon 760M

Get a comprehensive performance analysis of your gaming rig with detailed benchmarks, bottleneck detection, and upgrade recommendations

88 / 100
HIGH-END

Power Build

Top 12% of systems. Excellent for 1440p Ultra or 4K High gaming.

1440p Ultra4K High

System Balance Analysis

CPU vs GPU performance ratio
Well Balanced
CPU
93%
VS
GPU
83%
PROCESSOR

AMD Ryzen AI Max PRO 385

43,326 Benchmark Score
Top 7% Market Ranking
View Full Specs →
GRAPHICS CARD

AMD Radeon 760M

6,019 Benchmark Score
Top 17% Market Ranking
View Full Specs →

Market Position

How your build compares to others
Budget
0-30
Mid-Range
30-60
High-End
60-85
Enthusiast
85-100
Your Build

Game Performance Benchmarks

Real-world 4K FPS in popular titles
View All Games →

Performance Insights

Tips to maximize your system

Strong Performance

Excellent for 1440p gaming. Most games will run at high/ultra settings smoothly.

Compatible Games See what you can play Compare CPUs Find upgrades Compare GPUs Find upgrades

Performance Tiers Explained

90-100

Ultimate

4K Ultra gaming, VR ready, ray tracing enabled, professional workloads

4K 60+ FPS VR Ready
70-89

High-End

1440p Ultra or 4K High settings, excellent for modern AAA titles

1440p Ultra 4K High
50-69

Mid-Range

1080p Ultra or 1440p Medium, great value for most gamers

1080p Ultra 1440p Med
30-49

Entry Level

1080p Medium settings, suitable for eSports and older titles

1080p Med eSports
0-29

Legacy

Basic gaming, older titles, consider upgrading for modern games

720p-1080p Low Older Games

The AMD Ryzen AI Max PRO 385 paired with the AMD Radeon 760M is a laptop-class configuration that combines a high-end mobile processor with an entry-level integrated GPU. Because no measured FPS rows exist for this exact combination in the FACT PACK, all frame-rate discussions below are estimates derived from the benchmark scores of each component. The data indicates a system built for CPU-intensive productivity rather than high-end gaming, with the CPU performing at the 88th percentile among all processors while the GPU sits at the 35th percentile among all GPUs.

Gaming Performance

The FACT PACK contains no measured FPS data for this pairing, so all gaming expectations are framed as estimates based on the GPU's benchmark scores. The Radeon 760M delivers a Passmark G3D score of 5310, placing it at the 35th percentile of all GPUs. This positions it as an entry-level integrated solution, roughly comparable to the AMD Radeon RX 6400, which scores 6001 (a 0.3% delta), and the NVIDIA Quadro P2000, which scores 6049 (a -0.5% delta). In practical terms, this GPU is capable of running less demanding titles at lower settings, but it will struggle with modern AAA games at high detail.

The GPU's DirectX 12 score of 25 in Passmark, alongside a DirectX 11 score of 52 and a DirectX 9 score of 65, suggests that the hardware handles older APIs more efficiently than newer ones. The 3DMark Steel Nomad DX12 score of 400 reinforces this pattern, indicating modest performance under current-generation graphics workloads. The Geekbench Vulkan score of 30336 is notably higher than the OpenCL score of 20255, suggesting that Vulkan-based games may perform relatively better than those relying on OpenCL compute paths.

For resolution targets, the GPU's FP32 throughput of 5.323 TFLOPS and pixel rate of 41.58 GPixel/s indicate that 1080p gaming is the practical ceiling. At 1440p or 4K, the texture rate of 83.17 GTexel/s and the 16 ROPs would become severe bottlenecks, making high-resolution gaming unrealistic. The system's memory bandwidth of 256.0 GB/s from the CPU's quad-channel LPDDR5X support is shared with the GPU, which helps but cannot compensate for the GPU's limited shading units (512) and TMUs (32). Estimates suggest that esports titles and older games could achieve playable frame rates at 1080p with medium settings, while newer releases would require low settings or significant resolution scaling.

Benchmark Performance

The CPU benchmarks are the standout feature of this configuration. In Cinebench R23, the Ryzen AI Max PRO 385 scores 28424 in multi-core and 4012 in single-core. These are strong results for a mobile processor, placing it at the 88th percentile among all CPUs. The multi-core score indicates exceptional sustained throughput for a 55W TDP part, while the single-core score of 4012 shows excellent per-thread performance for everyday responsiveness.

The Cinebench R20 results follow a similar pattern: 11938 multi-core and 1685 single-core. The R15 scores are 2865 multi-core and 404 single-core. Across all three Cinebench versions, the scaling from single-core to multi-core is roughly 7x, which aligns with the 8-core, 16-thread configuration. The Passmark suite reinforces this: multithread score of 32075, single-thread score of 3995, integer math at 105056, floating-point math at 69580, and extended instructions at 31442. The data compression score of 379448 and encryption score of 18978 indicate strong performance for data-heavy workloads.

The average benchmark score for the CPU is 43326, placing it just 0.2% below the AMD Ryzen AI 9 465 (43431) and 0.3% above the Intel Core Ultra 9 386H (43210). It trails the AMD Ryzen 7 170 by 0.8% and the AMD Ryzen 7 PRO 7745 by 0.9%. These are marginal differences, meaning the CPU trades blows with its closest rivals within a 1% band.

The GPU's average benchmark score is 6019, with a Passmark G3D score of 5310 and a Passmark GPU compute score of 2840. The Geekbench OpenCL score of 20255 and Vulkan score of 30336 show that compute workloads perform better than graphics rendering tasks. The combined percentile for this CPU+GPU pairing is 62, reflecting a system where the processor is far more capable than the graphics solution. The combined picture is one of a workstation-class CPU paired with an entry-level IGP, creating a lopsided performance profile.

Balance and Bottleneck

The data clearly shows that the GPU is the limiting factor in almost every workload that involves graphics. The CPU sits at the 88th percentile among all processors, while the GPU sits at the 35th percentile among all GPUs. This 53-percentile gap is substantial and means that in gaming scenarios, the Radeon 760M will bottleneck the Ryzen AI Max PRO 385 long before the CPU's multi-core capabilities are stressed.

Evidence from FPS scaling supports this conclusion. The GPU's Passmark DirectX scores are uniformly low (19 for DX10, 52 for DX11, 25 for DX12), indicating that even with a powerful CPU feeding it data, the graphics pipeline cannot produce high frame rates. The CPU's single-thread score of 3995 in Passmark and 4012 in Cinebench R23 would be more than sufficient for gaming physics and game logic, but the GPU's 512 shading units and 16 ROPs create a hard ceiling on pixel throughput.

In CPU-bound workloads, the balance flips. For tasks like data compression (379448), encryption (18978), and floating-point math (69580), the GPU plays no role, and the CPU's 8 cores and 16 threads operate at full capacity. The 32 MB of shared L3 cache and 1 MB L2 per core provide ample data locality for multi-threaded applications. The system's 256.0 GB/s memory bandwidth, delivered through quad-channel LPDDR5X, is a shared resource that benefits both CPU and GPU, but the GPU's system-dependent bandwidth means it cannot fully utilize this capacity for graphics.

The bottleneck analysis suggests that for gaming, the GPU is the sole constraint, and upgrading the graphics solution would yield the largest performance gains. For productivity, the CPU is well-balanced with the memory subsystem, and the GPU becomes irrelevant. The combined percentile of 62 reflects this imbalance, indicating a system that excels at compute tasks but falls short in graphics-intensive scenarios.

Who Should Build It

This configuration targets users whose primary workload is CPU-heavy and who need graphics only for basic display output or light acceleration. The 88th percentile CPU performance makes it suitable for software developers compiling large codebases, data analysts running complex queries, and students in engineering or scientific disciplines who run simulations. The 16 threads and strong multi-core scores (28424 in Cinebench R23) support parallel compilation and batch processing.

Content creators working with video editing will find the CPU's performance adequate for encoding and rendering, but the GPU's 35th percentile ranking means GPU-accelerated effects will be slow. The Passmark GPU compute score of 2840 suggests that OpenCL-based filters in editing software will lag behind systems with discrete GPUs. For 3D rendering, the CPU can handle CPU-based renderers like those used in architectural visualization, but real-time viewport performance will be limited by the GPU's 5.323 TFLOPS FP32 throughput.

Small business workstations that run office suites, database management, and financial modeling will benefit from the CPU's single-thread performance (4012 in Cinebench R23) and multi-thread capacity. The ECC memory support adds reliability for long-running server-like tasks. Gamers at 1080p with modest expectations may find the GPU sufficient for older titles or esports games, but the data does not support recommending this for high-refresh gaming. The system is best suited for professionals who prioritize CPU compute over graphics.

Usage Scenarios

High-refresh gaming: The GPU's 35th percentile ranking and DirectX 12 score of 25 make high-refresh gaming unrealistic. Estimates suggest 1080p at 60Hz is achievable only for undemanding titles, and even then, frame rates would likely dip below 60 FPS in scenes with many objects. The CPU's strong single-thread performance (3995 Passmark) prevents it from being a bottleneck, but the GPU cannot deliver the frame rates needed for 144Hz or 240Hz displays.

Streaming: The CPU's 8 cores and 16 threads, combined with a Cinebench R23 multi-core score of 28424, can handle software encoding for streaming while maintaining game performance. The Passmark data encryption score of 18978 indicates the CPU can manage the encoding overhead. However, the GPU's limited graphics power means the game being streamed would need to be low-demand, and the overall stream quality would be capped by the GPU's rendering capabilities.

Video editing: The CPU excels in this scenario. The Cinebench R23 multi-core score of 28424 and Passmark floating-point math score of 69580 support fast timeline scrubbing and export encoding. The 256.0 GB/s memory bandwidth helps with large video files. The GPU's 5310 G3D score and 2840 compute score mean GPU-accelerated effects, color grading, and motion graphics will be sluggish, making this a CPU-centric editing workstation.

3D rendering: CPU-based rendering is a strong suit. The Passmark multithread score of 32075 and extended instructions score of 31442 indicate robust performance for ray tracing and simulation workloads. The 32 MB L3 cache helps with scene data. GPU-based rendering, however, is severely limited by the Radeon 760M's 5.323 TFLOPS FP32 and 8 RT cores, making real-time viewport interaction and GPU render engines impractical.

Software development: The CPU's 16 threads and strong integer math score (105056) make it excellent for compiling, testing, and running virtual machines. The single-thread score of 3995 ensures fast IDE responsiveness. The ECC memory support adds stability for long build processes. The GPU is sufficient for multiple displays and basic UI acceleration, but developers using GPU compute for machine learning would find the 2840 GPU compute score limiting.

Student and office work: This scenario is well-served by the CPU's 4012 single-core Cinebench R23 score and 3995 Passmark single-thread score. Office applications, web browsing, and document editing will feel snappy. The 55W TDP allows for thin-and-light laptop designs with adequate cooling. The GPU handles 2D desktop rendering well, as indicated by the Passmark G2D score of 890, and the system's 88th percentile CPU ranking ensures longevity for multi-year academic use.

FAQ

Q: What is the CPU's percentile ranking among all processors?

A: The AMD Ryzen AI Max PRO 385 sits at the 88th percentile among all CPUs, with an average benchmark score of 43326.

Q: How does the CPU compare to its closest rival, the AMD Ryzen AI 9 465?

A: The Ryzen AI Max PRO 385 scores 43326, which is 0.2% lower than the Ryzen AI 9 465's 43431. This is a negligible difference in real-world performance.

Q: What is the GPU's percentile ranking among all GPUs?

A: The AMD Radeon 760M sits at the 35th percentile among all GPUs, with an average benchmark score of 6019.

Q: Does this system support ECC memory?

A: Yes, the CPU supports ECC memory, and it uses LPDDR5X memory with a quad-channel bus providing 256.0 GB/s of bandwidth.

Q: What is the combined percentile for this CPU+GPU pairing?

A: The combined percentile is 62, reflecting a system where the CPU is far more capable than the GPU.

Q: What is the CPU's boost clock speed?

A: The CPU has a base clock of 3.60 GHz and a boost clock of 5.00 GHz.

Q: How many RT cores does the GPU have?

A: The Radeon 760M has 8 ray tracing cores, but its overall ray tracing performance is limited by its 35th percentile ranking.

CPU Analysis

The AMD Ryzen AI Max PRO 385 is an 8-core, 16-thread mobile processor built on the Zen 5 architecture, codenamed Strix Halo. It is manufactured on TSMC's 4 nm process node. The base clock is 3.60 GHz with a boost clock of 5.00 GHz, and the TDP is rated at 55W. The cache hierarchy consists of 80 KB L1 per core, 1 MB L2 per core, and 32 MB of shared L3 cache.

The benchmark scores reveal a processor that excels in both single-threaded and multi-threaded workloads. The Cinebench R23 single-core score of 4012 places it among the top mobile processors for everyday responsiveness, while the multi-core score of 28424 demonstrates that the 8-core design scales efficiently. The Passmark single-thread score of 3995 corroborates the Cinebench result, and the multithread score of 32075 confirms strong parallel performance.

The CPU's 88th percentile ranking is supported by its nearest rivals, all of which score within 1% of its average benchmark score of 43326. The AMD Ryzen AI 9 465 is 0.2% higher, the Intel Core Ultra 9 386H is 0.3% lower, the AMD Ryzen 7 170 is 0.8% higher, and the AMD Ryzen 7 PRO 7745 is 0.9% higher. This tight clustering indicates that the Ryzen AI Max PRO 385 is competitive with the best mobile processors currently available.

The memory support includes LPDDR5X with a quad-channel bus and 256.0 GB/s bandwidth, which is substantial for a mobile platform. The ECC memory support is a notable feature for workstation reliability. The CPU uses AMD Socket FP11 and provides PCIe Gen 4 with 16 lanes. The integrated graphics are listed as Radeon 8050S, though the system in question pairs it with the Radeon 760M. The production status is active, with a release date of January 5, 2025.

Build Overview

This is a laptop-class build (buildClass: "laptop") that pairs the AMD Ryzen AI Max PRO 385 with the AMD Radeon 760M. The CPU is a high-end mobile processor at the 88th percentile, while the GPU is an entry-level integrated solution at the 35th percentile. The combined percentile of 62 places this system in the mid-range overall, but the performance profile is heavily skewed toward CPU compute.

The CPU's 8 cores and 16 threads, running at up to 5.00 GHz, provide workstation-level processing power in a mobile form factor. The 55W TDP allows for integration into laptops without extreme cooling requirements. The GPU, with 512 shading units and a boost clock of 2599 MHz, is adequate for basic display output and light graphics tasks but is not designed for gaming or GPU-accelerated compute.

The system's overall tier, based on the 62nd combined percentile, indicates a machine that outperforms the majority of laptops in CPU tasks but falls behind in graphics performance. This is a specialized configuration for users who need maximum CPU throughput in a portable package and are willing to accept limited GPU capabilities. The memory system, with 256.0 GB/s bandwidth and ECC support, reinforces the workstation-oriented design.

GPU Analysis

The AMD Radeon 760M is an integrated GPU based on the RDNA 3.0 architecture, built on the Phoenix chip. It is manufactured on TSMC's 4 nm process with 25,390 million transistors on a 178 mm² die. The GPU has a base clock of 800 MHz and a boost clock of 2599 MHz. It features 512 shading units, 32 TMUs, and 16 ROPs, along with 8 ray tracing cores.

The memory configuration is system-shared, meaning the GPU uses the CPU's LPDDR5X memory with bandwidth that is system-dependent. The GPU's FP32 throughput is 5.323 TFLOPS, with FP16 also at 5.323 TFLOPS (1:1 ratio). The pixel rate is 41.58 GPixel/s, and the texture rate is 83.17 GTexel/s. The TDP is rated at 15W, and the bus interface is PCIe 4.0 x8.

Benchmark results place this GPU at the 35th percentile, with an average score of 6019. The Passmark G3D score of 5310 is close to the AMD Radeon RX 6400 (6001, 0.3% higher) and the NVIDIA Quadro P2000 (6049, 0.5% lower). The Geekbench Vulkan score of 30336 is significantly higher than the OpenCL score of 20255, suggesting better performance in Vulkan-based applications. The Passmark GPU compute score of 2840 indicates limited compute capability, which affects workloads like machine learning inference and GPU-accelerated rendering.

The API support includes DirectX 12 Ultimate (12_2), OpenGL 4.6, and Vulkan 1.4. The GPU's predecessor is the Navi II IGP, and it was released on January 30, 2024. For rendering tasks, the 8 RT cores provide basic ray tracing support, but the overall performance is constrained by the 35th percentile ranking and the limited 16 ROPs.

Upgrade Path and Platform

The CPU uses the AMD Socket FP11, which is a mobile platform socket, meaning upgrades are typically limited to the system's design. The memory support is LPDDR5X with a quad-channel bus, providing 256.0 GB/s of bandwidth. ECC memory is supported, which is beneficial for data integrity in workstation tasks. The platform provides PCIe Gen 4 with 16 lanes from the CPU, and the GPU uses a PCIe 4.0 x8 interface.

The CPU's TDP is 55W, and the GPU's TDP is 15W, giving a combined thermal envelope of approximately 70W for the core components. There is no suggested PSU listed, as this is an IGP configuration that relies on laptop power delivery. The GPU has no power connectors and uses system-shared memory, so there is no discrete GPU upgrade path within the same chassis.

For a sensible next upgrade, the data suggests that the GPU is the primary bottleneck. Since the Radeon 760M is integrated, the only way to improve graphics performance would be to move to a system with a discrete GPU. The CPU's 88th percentile ranking means it would pair well with a mid-range or high-end discrete GPU in a future build. The 16 PCIe Gen 4 lanes from the CPU provide sufficient bandwidth for most discrete GPUs, and the 256.0 GB/s memory bandwidth would not be a limiting factor.

The platform's memory support is fixed to LPDDR5X, so memory upgrades are not possible after purchase. The ECC support is a value-add for professional workloads. The CPU's production status is active, and its release date of January 5, 2025, means it is a current-generation part. For users looking to extend the system's life, the CPU can handle several years of productivity workloads, but gaming performance will remain constrained by the integrated GPU.