SYSTEM ANALYZER

Rate My PC: AMD Ryzen AI Max PRO 380 + NVIDIA Quadro RTX 5000 Mobile Refresh

Get a comprehensive performance analysis of your gaming rig with detailed benchmarks, bottleneck detection, and upgrade recommendations

Build Configuration

Select your components

PROCESSOR (CPU)

▼

GRAPHICS CARD (GPU)

▼

84 Score

Top 16% Ranking

84 / 100

HIGH-END

Power Build

Top 16% of systems. Excellent for 1440p Ultra or 4K High gaming.

1440p Ultra4K High

System Balance Analysis

CPU vs GPU performance ratio

Well Balanced

CPU

94%

GPU

74%

PROCESSOR

AMD Ryzen AI Max PRO 380

48,171 Benchmark Score

Top 6% Market Ranking

View Full Specs →

GRAPHICS CARD

NVIDIA Quadro RTX 5000 Mobile Refresh

0 Benchmark Score

Top 26% Market Ranking

View Full Specs →

Market Position

How your build compares to others

Budget

0-30

Mid-Range

30-60

High-End

60-85

Enthusiast

85-100

Your Build

Game Performance Benchmarks

Real-world 4K FPS in popular titles

View All Games →

Performance Insights

Tips to maximize your system

Strong Performance

Excellent for 1440p gaming. Most games will run at high/ultra settings smoothly.

Compatible Games See what you can play Compare CPUs Find upgrades Compare GPUs Find upgrades

Performance Tiers Explained

90-100

Ultimate

4K Ultra gaming, VR ready, ray tracing enabled, professional workloads

4K 60+ FPS VR Ready

70-89

High-End

1440p Ultra or 4K High settings, excellent for modern AAA titles

1440p Ultra 4K High

50-69

Mid-Range

1080p Ultra or 1440p Medium, great value for most gamers

1080p Ultra 1440p Med

30-49

Entry Level

1080p Medium settings, suitable for eSports and older titles

1080p Med eSports

0-29

Legacy

Basic gaming, older titles, consider upgrading for modern games

720p-1080p Low Older Games

# AMD Ryzen AI Max PRO 380 + NVIDIA Quadro RTX 5000 Mobile Refresh

This laptop build pairs a modern 6-core Zen 5 processor with an end-of-life Turing-generation professional GPU, creating a system that sits at the 70th percentile overall among all tracked configurations. The CPU is a strong performer, ranking in the 90th percentile among all CPUs, while the GPU lands at the 50th percentile among all GPUs. This is a machine with a clear split personality: the processor is ready for demanding compute and productivity workloads, while the graphics card is a capable but older professional solution that excels in certified rendering and display tasks rather than raw gaming frame rates.

CPU Analysis

The AMD Ryzen AI Max PRO 380 is built on the Zen 5 architecture using TSMC's 4 nm process node, codenamed Strix Halo. It offers 6 cores and 12 threads, with a base clock of 3.60 GHz and a boost clock of 4.90 GHz. The processor has a 55 W TDP, making it a reasonably power-efficient mobile part that can sustain decent performance in a laptop chassis.

Cache configuration is substantial for a 6-core part: 80 KB of L1 per core, 1 MB of L2 per core, and 16 MB of shared L3 cache. This yields a total of 16 MB of L3, which is shared across all cores. The memory controller supports LPDDR5X in a dual-channel configuration, delivering 128.0 GB/s of memory bandwidth. ECC memory is supported, which is notable for professional and workstation use cases where data integrity is critical.

The CPU's benchmark results tell a story of balanced performance. In PassMark testing, the single-thread score is 3995, which is solid for a mobile processor and reflects the Zen 5 architecture's strong IPC improvements. The multi-thread score is 24244, indicating that the 6-core/12-thread configuration scales well under parallel workloads. Integer math scores 79789, floating-point math scores 53084, and extended instructions score 24333. Data compression hits 293595, while data encryption is 14502. Physics simulation scores 1120, and random string sorting is 31153. The find prime numbers test is the outlier at 75, which is a low score that suggests the CPU may not be optimized for that specific integer-heavy workload pattern.

The average benchmark score for this CPU is 48171, placing it in the 90th percentile among all CPUs. Its nearest rivals are remarkably close: the Intel Core Ultra 5 235A scores 48201 (a delta of -0.1%), the Intel Core Ultra 5 245HX scores 48287 (delta -0.2%), the AMD Ryzen 9 3900 scores 47918 (delta 0.5%), and the AMD Ryzen 9 7900X3D scores 47908 (delta 0.5%). This means the Ryzen AI Max PRO 380 sits right in the middle of a tight cluster of desktop and mobile processors, essentially matching the multi-threaded performance of a Ryzen 9 7900X3D, which is a 12-core desktop part. The fact that a 6-core mobile chip can match a 12-core desktop chip confirms the efficiency of the Zen 5 architecture at 4 nm.

For real workloads, these numbers indicate that the CPU can handle heavy multi-threaded tasks like 3D rendering, video encoding, and software compilation with ease. The strong integer and floating-point scores suggest good general-purpose compute capability. The data compression score of 293595 is particularly high, which benefits file archiving and database workloads. The encryption score of 14502 is moderate, meaning AES-NI acceleration is present but not exceptional.

Benchmark Performance

The combined benchmark picture for this build is defined by a significant imbalance. The CPU sits at the 90th percentile among all CPUs, which is an excellent position. The GPU, however, sits at the 50th percentile among all GPUs, making it an average performer in the broader GPU landscape. The combined percentile for this build is 70, reflecting the mixed nature of the pairing.

The CPU's average benchmark score is 48171, with its nearest rival being the Intel Core Ultra 5 235A at 48201, a negligible 0.1% difference. The Ryzen AI Max PRO 380 is effectively tied with that Intel part. Against the AMD Ryzen 9 7900X3D, the Ryzen AI Max PRO 380 is 0.5% ahead, which is within noise but still notable given the desktop chip's larger core count.

The GPU has no benchmark scores listed and no nearest rivals, meaning its average benchmark score is 0. This is a data gap, but the percentile ranking of 50 tells us it performs at the median level of all GPUs. The GPU's FP32 compute is rated at 9.400 TFLOPS, which is a moderate figure for a professional mobile GPU from the Turing era.

The combined picture is a system that will excel in CPU-bound tasks but will be limited by the GPU in graphics-intensive workloads. For productivity applications that are primarily CPU-bound, this build will feel fast. For gaming or GPU-accelerated rendering, the GPU will be the limiting factor. The 70th percentile combined ranking reflects a system that is above average overall but not exceptional in any single dimension except CPU performance.

Gaming Performance

There are no measured FPS rows in the data for this exact CPU+GPU combination. The FACT PACK contains no measuredFps data, so all frame rate discussion must be treated as estimates derived from the benchmark scores. The CPU's strong single-thread score of 3995 and the GPU's 50th percentile ranking suggest that gaming performance will be moderate.

The GPU is a Quadro-class professional part, which is not optimized for gaming drivers. The Turing architecture with 3072 shading units and a boost clock of 1530 MHz provides a theoretical FP32 throughput of 9.400 TFLOPS. This is roughly equivalent to a mid-range desktop GPU from the same era. In modern games, this would translate to playable frame rates at 1080p with medium to high settings, but the lack of measured data means these are only estimates.

The CPU's 4.90 GHz boost clock and strong single-thread performance will prevent bottlenecks in most games, but the GPU will likely cap frame rates. For esports titles and older games, this system should handle high refresh rates at 1080p. For AAA titles from the last few years, expect 1080p at medium settings to be the practical ceiling. At 1440p or 4K, the GPU will struggle to maintain 60 FPS in demanding titles.

Since no measured FPS data exists, treat all gaming performance statements as estimates based on the GPU's 50th percentile ranking and the CPU's 90th percentile ranking.

FAQ

Q: How does the CPU compare to its nearest rivals in multi-threaded performance?

A: The Ryzen AI Max PRO 380 has an average benchmark score of 48171, which is 0.1% lower than the Intel Core Ultra 5 245HX (48287) and 0.5% higher than both the AMD Ryzen 9 3900 (47918) and the AMD Ryzen 9 7900X3D (47908). This places it in a virtual tie with these processors.

Q: What is the GPU's architecture and when was it released?

A: The NVIDIA Quadro RTX 5000 Mobile Refresh uses the Turing architecture (TU104B chip) on a 12 nm process node. It was released on 2020-06-07 and is now end-of-life, with its predecessor being the Quadro Pascal-M and its successor being the Ampere-MW.

Q: Does the CPU support ECC memory?

A: Yes, the AMD Ryzen AI Max PRO 380 supports ECC memory. It uses LPDDR5X in a dual-channel configuration with 128.0 GB/s of memory bandwidth.

Q: What is the GPU's memory configuration?

A: The GPU has 16 GB of GDDR6 memory on a 256-bit bus, with a bandwidth of 448.0 GB/s. The memory clock is 1750 MHz (14 Gbps effective).

Q: Is the CPU unlocked for overclocking?

A: No, the multiplier is locked (multiplierUnlocked is false). The CPU is a mobile part with a 55 W TDP, so overclocking is not supported.

Q: What PCIe version and lane count does the CPU provide?

A: The CPU provides PCIe Gen 4 with 16 lanes (CPU only). The GPU, however, uses a PCIe 3.0 x16 bus interface.

Q: What is the CPU's production status and release date?

A: The CPU is Active in production and was released on 2025-01-05. Its part number is 100-000001425.

Upgrade Path and Platform

The AMD Ryzen AI Max PRO 380 uses AMD Socket FP11, which is a mobile-specific socket. This means the CPU is soldered to the motherboard and cannot be upgraded in a traditional sense. The platform supports LPDDR5X memory in a dual-channel configuration, which is also typically soldered on mobile systems. The CPU has ECC memory support, which is unusual for a consumer mobile part and suggests a workstation-class intended use.

The CPU's PCIe Gen 4 with 16 lanes is the primary expansion interface. The GPU in this build uses PCIe 3.0 x16, which is backward compatible but means the GPU cannot take advantage of the newer PCIe Gen 4 bandwidth. This is a minor limitation for most workloads, as PCIe 3.0 x16 is sufficient for the GPU's 448.0 GB/s memory bandwidth.

The GPU has a TDP of 110 W and is marked as an IGP (integrated graphics processor) in terms of slot width, with no power connectors required. The CPU has a 55 W TDP. Combined, the system's power draw is modest for a laptop, leaving headroom for the rest of the system. There is no suggested PSU listed, but for a laptop this is not applicable. The power connectors are listed as "None" for the GPU, meaning it draws power from the system board.

A sensible next upgrade for this platform would be a newer GPU, but the PCIe 3.0 x16 interface and the laptop form factor limit options. Since the GPU is end-of-life, users looking for more graphics performance would need to consider a new laptop altogether. The CPU is current and active, so it will remain relevant for several years, but the platform is not expandable.

Who Should Build It

This build is suited for professionals who need strong CPU performance for compute-heavy tasks but do not require current-generation GPU acceleration. The CPU's 90th percentile ranking makes it excellent for software developers compiling large codebases, data analysts running complex queries, and students in STEM fields running simulations. The high data compression score of 293595 is particularly beneficial for database administrators and anyone working with large datasets.

Content creators who work primarily with CPU-based rendering or video encoding will find this system capable, as the multi-thread score of 24244 indicates strong parallel performance. The GPU's 16 GB of VRAM is useful for large textures in 3D modeling, but the Turing architecture is older, so GPU-accelerated rendering will be slower than modern alternatives.

For gamers, this build is not ideal. The GPU's 50th percentile ranking means it is average at best, and the Quadro drivers are not optimized for gaming. Gamers at 1080p with medium settings will find acceptable performance, but those seeking high refresh rates or 1440p/4K gaming should look elsewhere.

Small business workstations that need reliable ECC memory support and a proven CPU platform will benefit from this build. The CPU's active production status ensures long-term availability, and the 55 W TDP means it can be cooled adequately in a laptop chassis.

Balance and Bottleneck

The data clearly shows a CPU-bound system with a GPU that will limit graphics-intensive workloads. The CPU is at the 90th percentile among all CPUs, while the GPU is at the 50th percentile. This 40-percentile gap indicates that the GPU is the primary bottleneck in any workload that uses both components.

In gaming, the CPU's strong single-thread score of 3995 and boost clock of 4.90 GHz will prevent CPU bottlenecks in most scenarios. The GPU, with its 3072 shading units and 9.400 TFLOPS FP32 performance, will be the limiting factor for frame rates. The lack of measured FPS data makes it impossible to quantify this precisely, but the GPU's median ranking suggests it will cap performance well below what the CPU can feed.

In compute workloads, the CPU will dominate. The multi-thread score of 24244 and the integer math score of 79789 indicate that the CPU can handle heavy parallel processing. The GPU's FP32 throughput of 9.400 TFLOPS is modest, so GPU-accelerated tasks like machine learning inference or 3D rendering will be slower than the CPU's capabilities suggest.

Memory bandwidth is another consideration. The CPU has 128.0 GB/s of bandwidth, while the GPU has 448.0 GB/s. This means the GPU has enough bandwidth for its workload, but the CPU's bandwidth is on the lower side for a modern processor, potentially limiting performance in memory-intensive tasks.

Build Overview

This is a laptop build (buildClass is "laptop") that pairs the AMD Ryzen AI Max PRO 380 with the NVIDIA Quadro RTX 5000 Mobile Refresh. The overall tier is defined by the combined percentile of 70, which places it above average among all tracked builds. The CPU is a standout component at the 90th percentile, while the GPU is average at the 50th percentile.

This is a professional-oriented laptop with a workstation-class CPU and a professional GPU. The CPU is from the modern Zen 5 generation, while the GPU is from the Turing generation and is end-of-life. This creates a system that is well-suited for CPU-intensive professional work but will not excel in gaming or modern GPU-accelerated workloads.

The build's class and component choices suggest it was designed for users who prioritize CPU performance and professional features like ECC memory support over gaming performance. The 70th percentile overall ranking reflects a system that is solid but not exceptional, with the CPU carrying the bulk of the performance weight.

GPU Analysis

The NVIDIA Quadro RTX 5000 Mobile Refresh is a Turing-architecture professional GPU built on TSMC's 12 nm process node. The chip, designated TU104B, contains 13,600 million transistors on a 545 mm² die, yielding a transistor density of 25.0M per mm². This is a large chip by modern standards, reflecting the older 12 nm process.

The GPU has 3072 shading units, 192 texture mapping units, and 64 raster operation units. It features 48 ray tracing cores and 384 tensor cores, which were high-end for the Turing generation but are now several generations old. The base clock is 1035 MHz, with a boost clock of 1530 MHz. The pixel rate is 97.92 GPixel/s, and the texture rate is 293.8 GTexel/s.

Memory is a highlight: 16 GB of GDDR6 on a 256-bit bus, with 448.0 GB/s of bandwidth. The memory clock is 1750 MHz (14 Gbps effective). This large VRAM capacity is beneficial for professional applications that handle large textures, 3D scenes, or machine learning models that fit within 16 GB.

Compute performance is rated at 9.400 TFLOPS for FP32 and 18.80 TFLOPS for FP16 (2:1 ratio). These figures place the GPU in the mid-range of modern GPUs, but its Turing architecture lacks the newer features of Ampere, Ada, or Blackwell. The GPU supports DirectX 12 Ultimate (12_2), OpenGL 4.6, and Vulkan 1.4, so it can run modern graphics APIs.

The GPU has a TDP of 110 W, is marked as an IGP (integrated graphics processor) for slot width, and requires no power connectors. It uses a PCIe 3.0 x16 bus interface. Display outputs are listed as "Portable Device Dependent," meaning they vary by laptop manufacturer. The GPU is end-of-life, released on 2020-06-07, with a predecessor of Quadro Pascal-M and a successor of Ampere-MW.

For rendering workloads, the 9.400 TFLOPS FP32 performance is adequate for professional 3D modeling and CAD work, but it will be slower than modern GPUs. The 16 GB VRAM is a significant advantage for large scenes, and the 48 RT cores provide hardware ray tracing support, though at lower performance than newer generations.

Usage Scenarios

High-refresh gaming: Not recommended. The GPU's 50th percentile ranking and Quadro-class drivers mean this system is not optimized for gaming. At 1080p, medium settings may achieve playable frame rates, but high-refresh monitors will not be fully utilized.

Streaming: The CPU's strong multi-thread score of 24244 can handle software encoding, while the GPU's 384 tensor cores could assist with NVIDIA's encoding features. However, the Turing architecture's encoder is older, and streaming performance will be adequate but not exceptional.

Video editing: The CPU's 90th percentile ranking and high integer math score of 79789 make it well-suited for video editing workloads. The GPU's 16 GB VRAM is useful for timeline previews and effects, but rendering times will be longer than with a modern GPU.

3D rendering: The CPU will handle viewport and simulation tasks well, but the GPU's 9.400 TFLOPS FP32 performance is modest for GPU-based rendering. The 16 GB VRAM is a plus for large scenes, but the Turing architecture will render slower than newer GPUs.

Software development: This is a strong use case. The CPU's multi-thread score of 24244 and data compression score of 293595 are excellent for compiling large codebases and managing version control. The ECC memory support adds reliability for long builds.

Student and office work: The CPU's single-thread score of 3995 ensures snappy responsiveness in office applications, while the 55 W TDP means the laptop can run cool and quiet. The GPU is overkill for these tasks, but the system will handle them effortlessly.

Rate My PC: AMD Ryzen AI Max PRO 380 + NVIDIA Quadro RTX 5000 Mobile Refresh

Power Build

System Balance Analysis

AMD Ryzen AI Max PRO 380

NVIDIA Quadro RTX 5000 Mobile Refresh

Market Position

Game Performance Benchmarks

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

Performance Insights

Strong Performance

Performance Tiers Explained

Ultimate

High-End

Mid-Range

Entry Level

Legacy

CPU Analysis

Benchmark Performance

Gaming Performance

FAQ

Upgrade Path and Platform

Who Should Build It

Balance and Bottleneck

Build Overview

GPU Analysis

Usage Scenarios

4K Gaming Performance

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

1440p Gaming Performance

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

1080p Gaming Performance

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

Related Processors

Related Graphics Cards

Compare Your CPU

Compare Your GPU

Related PC Builds

Same CPU with Different GPUs

Same GPU with Different CPUs

Other Popular Builds