SYSTEM ANALYZER

Rate My PC: AMD Ryzen AI Max+ 395 + NVIDIA RTX 5000 Mobile Ada Generation

Get a comprehensive performance analysis of your gaming rig with detailed benchmarks, bottleneck detection, and upgrade recommendations

Build Configuration

Select your components

PROCESSOR (CPU)

▼

GRAPHICS CARD (GPU)

▼

88 Score

Top 12% Ranking

88 / 100

HIGH-END

Power Build

Top 12% of systems. Excellent for 1440p Ultra or 4K High gaming.

1440p Ultra4K High

System Balance Analysis

CPU vs GPU performance ratio

Well Balanced

CPU

97%

GPU

80%

PROCESSOR

AMD Ryzen AI Max+ 395

77,740 Benchmark Score

Top 3% Market Ranking

View Full Specs →

GRAPHICS CARD

NVIDIA RTX 5000 Mobile Ada Generation

3,596 Benchmark Score

Top 20% Market Ranking

View Full Specs →

Market Position

How your build compares to others

Budget

0-30

Mid-Range

30-60

High-End

60-85

Enthusiast

85-100

Your Build

Game Performance Benchmarks

Real-world 4K FPS in popular titles

View All Games →

Performance Insights

Tips to maximize your system

Strong Performance

Excellent for 1440p gaming. Most games will run at high/ultra settings smoothly.

Compatible Games See what you can play Compare CPUs Find upgrades Compare GPUs Find upgrades

Performance Tiers Explained

90-100

Ultimate

4K Ultra gaming, VR ready, ray tracing enabled, professional workloads

4K 60+ FPS VR Ready

70-89

High-End

1440p Ultra or 4K High settings, excellent for modern AAA titles

1440p Ultra 4K High

50-69

Mid-Range

1080p Ultra or 1440p Medium, great value for most gamers

1080p Ultra 1440p Med

30-49

Entry Level

1080p Medium settings, suitable for eSports and older titles

1080p Med eSports

0-29

Legacy

Basic gaming, older titles, consider upgrading for modern games

720p-1080p Low Older Games

# CPU Analysis

The AMD Ryzen AI Max+ 395 is a 16-core, 32-thread mobile processor built on the Zen 5 architecture, specifically the Strix Halo codename. Fabricated on TSMC's 4 nm process with a dual-chiplet design measuring 2x 70.6 mm², this CPU operates with a base clock of 3.00 GHz and a boost clock of 5.10 GHz within a 55 W TDP envelope. The cache hierarchy includes 80 KB of L1 per core, 1 MB of L2 per core, and a substantial 64 MB of shared L3 cache, which benefits workloads with large working sets such as code compilation and complex simulations. Memory support extends to LPDDR5X over a quad-channel interface, yielding 256.0 GB/s of bandwidth — a figure that rivals many desktop platforms and directly supports the integrated Radeon 8060S graphics.

Benchmark results place this processor in the 95th percentile of all CPUs, indicating top-tier performance for mobile computing. The Cinebench R23 multi-core score of 35,314 points demonstrates strong sustained throughput for rendering and heavy threaded workloads, while the single-core score of 2,044 points reflects capable per-thread performance for everyday responsiveness and lightly threaded applications. Geekbench results reinforce this profile: 20,992 in multi-core and 2,464 in single-core, showing balanced scaling from single to multi-threaded tasks. PassMark scores further characterize the CPU's strengths: integer math at 200,665, floating-point math at 128,682, and extended instructions at 56,346 indicate robust ALU and FPU performance. Data compression scores of 690,650 and encryption at 35,455 show strong throughput for archival tasks and secure communications. The multithread score of 54,934 and physics score of 3,481 align with the CPU's positioning for demanding parallel workloads.

Relative to nearest rivals, the Ryzen AI Max+ 395 sits 1.6% above the AMD Ryzen Threadripper PRO 9945WX and the AMD EPYC Embedded 8224P in average benchmark score, while trailing the Intel Core i9-14900K by 1.7% and leading the AMD Ryzen 9 8945HX by 2%. These deltas are narrow, placing this mobile chip within striking distance of desktop-class parts. For real workloads, the 16-core configuration with high memory bandwidth means video encoding, 3D scene assembly, and software build pipelines will execute with minimal stalls. The 64 MB L3 cache reduces DRAM traffic, which is especially beneficial in latency-sensitive workloads like database queries and real-time analytics. The quad-channel memory interface further boosts throughput, making this CPU well-suited for tasks that stream large datasets — a characteristic that pairs naturally with the integrated Radeon 8060S graphics, which shares that memory pool.

# GPU Analysis

The NVIDIA RTX 5000 Mobile Ada Generation is a laptop-class GPU based on the Ada Lovelace architecture, built on TSMC's 5 nm process with 45,900 million transistors across a 379 mm² die. The AD103 chip contains 9,728 shading units, 304 texture mapping units, and 112 ROPs, providing substantial raw compute capacity. Clock speeds range from a 1,425 MHz base to a 2,115 MHz boost, enabling peak performance when thermal headroom allows. The 16 GB of GDDR6 memory operates across a 256-bit bus, delivering 576.0 GB/s of bandwidth — a configuration that supports high-resolution textures and large scene datasets without excessive swapping. The memory clock runs at 2,250 MHz with 18 Gbps effective throughput, positioning this GPU for demanding visual workloads.

Ray tracing hardware includes 76 RT cores, while 304 tensor cores handle AI-accelerated tasks such as DLSS and neural network inference. These dedicated units enable hardware-accelerated ray-traced lighting, shadows, and reflections, with tensor cores providing the computational foundation for AI-based upscaling and frame generation. Pixel rate reaches 236.9 GPixel/s, and texture rate hits 643.0 GTexel/s, indicating strong fill rates for high-resolution rendering. FP32 compute is rated at 41.15 TFLOPS, with FP16 at 41.15 TFLOPS (1:1), meaning the GPU does not halve throughput for half-precision — a relevant detail for machine learning inference and certain rendering paths that leverage FP16.

The GPU supports DirectX 12 Ultimate (12_2), OpenGL 4.6, and Vulkan 1.4, covering modern graphics APIs across gaming and professional applications. The 3DMark Steel Nomad DX12 score of 3,596 places this GPU in the 21st percentile of all GPUs, which is a modest position relative to the broader GPU landscape. Nearest rivals in benchmark scores include the NVIDIA GeForce GT 545 (deltaPct 0.1%), GT 735M (deltaPct -0.6%), GTX 1050 (deltaPct -0.9%), and AMD Radeon HD 6770 (deltaPct -1.5%). These deltas are extremely tight — within 1.5% — indicating that the RTX 5000 Mobile Ada Generation's absolute performance in this particular test aligns closely with these older or lower-tier parts. However, the modern feature set, including RT cores and tensor cores, positions it ahead of those legacy GPUs in workloads that leverage those specialized units, even if raw rasterization scores are comparable. For rendering, the combination of 16 GB VRAM, 576 GB/s bandwidth, and RT/tensor hardware means this GPU can handle complex scenes with ray tracing and AI-assisted denoising, though the percentile ranking suggests expectations should be tempered relative to higher-tier desktop GPUs.

# Benchmark Performance

The combined benchmark picture for this CPU-GPU pairing shows a system with a very strong processor and a mid-tier graphics component. The CPU's 95th percentile standing among all CPUs is a headline figure — this is a top-5% mobile processor. The GPU's 21st percentile ranking is notably lower, indicating that the graphics component is not in the same performance class as the CPU. The combined percentile for the build is 58, reflecting the overall system position when both components are considered together — a mid-range placement that is dragged down by the GPU's relative weakness.

Exact CPU scores include Cinebench R15 multi-core at 5,463 and single-core at 316, Cinebench R23 multi-core at 35,314 and single-core at 2,044, and Geekbench multi-core at 20,992 and single-core at 2,464. PassMark results span 690,650 in data compression, 35,455 in data encryption, 56,346 in extended instructions, 303 in find prime numbers, 128,682 in floating-point math, 200,665 in integer math, 54,934 in multithread, 3,481 in physics, 76,177 in random string sorting, and 4,147 in single-thread (both singlethread and single_thread variants). The average benchmark score for the CPU is 77,740, with nearest rivals within ±2% as detailed earlier.

The GPU's sole benchmark score is 3,596 in 3DMark Steel Nomad DX12, with an average of 3,596 and nearest rivals within 1.5%. The combined picture is one of asymmetry: the CPU delivers elite-level multi-threaded performance, while the GPU delivers mid-tier rasterization performance with modern feature support. For workloads that are CPU-bound — such as code compilation, data processing, or physics simulation — this system will perform exceptionally. For GPU-bound tasks like high-resolution gaming or heavy rendering, the GPU will be the limiting factor. The combined percentile of 58 reflects this compromise, placing the overall build in the upper-middle tier of all CPU-GPU combinations.

# Usage Scenarios

High-refresh gaming: The GPU's 3DMark Steel Nomad score of 3,596 and 21st percentile ranking suggest that 1080p gaming at high settings is feasible, but 1440p or 4K high-refresh play will likely exceed the GPU's capabilities, especially with ray tracing enabled. The CPU's strong single-core performance (2,044 in Cinebench R23) ensures frame pacing will not be CPU-limited in most titles.

Streaming: The CPU's 16 cores and 32 threads provide ample headroom for encoding video while gaming, with the 55 W TDP indicating efficient operation. The dedicated tensor cores on the GPU can offload AI-based encoding tasks, and the high memory bandwidth (256 GB/s system, 576 GB/s GPU) reduces bottlenecks when capturing and encoding simultaneously.

Video editing: Cinebench R23 multi-core at 35,314 and PassMark multithread at 54,934 indicate strong performance for export rendering and timeline processing. The 16 GB GPU VRAM accommodates large preview buffers and effects stacks, though the GPU's moderate compute (41.15 TFLOPS FP32) will limit acceleration of heavy effects compared to top-tier GPUs.

3D rendering: CPU-based rendering will shine with the 16-core Zen 5 configuration, as evidenced by the strong multi-core scores. GPU-accelerated rendering will be serviceable but not class-leading, given the 21st percentile GPU ranking; the 16 GB VRAM is adequate for moderate scene complexity, while the 576 GB/s bandwidth helps with texture streaming.

Software development: The 64 MB L3 cache and quad-channel memory (256 GB/s) reduce compilation times and improve parallel build performance. PassMark data compression at 690,650 and integer math at 200,665 indicate fast handling of source code, static analysis, and binary generation. Multi-core scaling in Geekbench (20,992 multi vs 2,464 single) confirms strong parallel efficiency for build toolchains.

Student and office work: The CPU's single-core scores (2,044 Cinebench R23, 4,147 PassMark) provide snappy responsiveness in document editing, web browsing, and spreadsheet tasks. The integrated Radeon 8060S graphics offers a fallback for display output, and the 55 W CPU TDP supports efficient battery operation, though the GPU's 120 W TDP means the discrete part will draw power when active.

# Balance and Bottleneck

This pairing exhibits a pronounced CPU-to-GPU imbalance. The CPU sits at the 95th percentile of all CPUs, while the GPU sits at the 21st percentile of all GPUs — a 74-point gap that clearly identifies the GPU as the limiting factor in graphics-intensive workloads. In CPU-bound tasks such as code compilation, data analysis, or multi-threaded rendering, the system will perform at near-elite levels, with the Ryzen AI Max+ 395's average benchmark score of 77,740 exceeding the EPYC Embedded 8224P by 1.6% and the Threadripper PRO 9945WX by 1.6%. However, when the GPU is the primary executor — as in gaming or GPU-accelerated rendering — the 3,596 Steel Nomad score will cap overall throughput, and frame rates will scale with GPU compute rather than CPU capability.

FPS scaling in gaming will follow GPU limits. The CPU can feed frames at high rates — its 2,044 single-core Cinebench score and 4,147 PassMark single-thread score ensure that game logic and draw call submission are not bottlenecks — but the GPU's mid-tier rasterization performance means frame rates will plateau according to the GPU's fill rates (236.9 GPixel/s pixel rate, 643.0 GTexel/s texture rate). For workloads that mix CPU and GPU demand, such as real-time 3D rendering with AI denoising, the tensor cores (304) and RT cores (76) can offload specific tasks, but the overall throughput will still be constrained by the GPU's 21st percentile standing. The 16 GB VRAM is a bright spot, preventing memory capacity from becoming a bottleneck in most scenarios, but bandwidth (576 GB/s) is not exceptional for a modern GPU, which may limit performance in texture-heavy scenes.

# Gaming Performance

No measured FPS rows exist for this exact CPU-GPU combination in the FACT PACK. The data contains no measuredFps entries, so all frame rate discussion below is estimated from the benchmark scores and should be treated as approximate expectations rather than tested results.

Based on the GPU's 3DMark Steel Nomad DX12 score of 3,596 and its 21st percentile ranking, gaming performance at 1080p resolution is expected to be playable at medium-to-high settings in most titles, with frame rates likely ranging from 60 to 90 FPS depending on the game's optimization. The GPU's 16 GB VRAM and 576 GB/s bandwidth support high-quality textures, but the compute throughput (41.15 TFLOPS FP32) suggests that demanding titles with heavy post-processing will stress the GPU. At 1440p, frame rates will likely drop by 25-35% due to the increased pixel load, placing many titles in the 40-60 FPS range at high settings. At 4K, the GPU will struggle to maintain 60 FPS in most AAA releases, as the pixel rate (236.9 GPixel/s) and texture rate (643.0 GTexel/s) are insufficient for that resolution at high detail levels.

Ray tracing performance will be limited by the 76 RT cores; enabled at 1080p, ray-traced effects will incur significant performance penalties, likely reducing frame rates by 30-50% compared to rasterized rendering. DLSS and AI-based upscaling, powered by the 304 tensor cores, can recover some performance, potentially restoring frame rates to playable levels at 1440p with quality or balanced presets. Esports titles at 1080p with competitive settings will likely exceed 100 FPS, as these games favor CPU performance (which is strong here) and do not stress the GPU heavily. Overall, the gaming experience will be defined by the GPU's mid-tier standing — capable of 1080p gaming with modern features, but not suited for high-refresh 1440p or 4K gaming without significant settings compromises.

# FAQ

Q: What is the CPU's percentile ranking among all processors?

A: The AMD Ryzen AI Max+ 395 is in the 95th percentile of all CPUs, indicating it outperforms 95% of processors in the benchmark database.

Q: How much VRAM does the RTX 5000 Mobile Ada Generation have?

A: The GPU has 16 GB of GDDR6 memory on a 256-bit bus, with 576.0 GB/s of memory bandwidth.

Q: What is the CPU's architecture and process node?

A: The CPU uses the Zen 5 architecture (Strix Halo codename) fabricated on TSMC's 4 nm process, with a dual-chiplet design of 2x 70.6 mm².

Q: Does the GPU support hardware ray tracing?

A: Yes, the RTX 5000 Mobile Ada Generation includes 76 RT cores for hardware-accelerated ray tracing, alongside 304 tensor cores for AI workloads.

Q: What is the combined percentile of this CPU-GPU pairing?

A: The combined percentile is 58, positioning this build in the upper-middle tier of all CPU-GPU combinations, despite the CPU's top-tier ranking.

Q: What memory bandwidth does the CPU support?

A: The CPU supports LPDDR5X memory over a quad-channel interface, providing 256.0 GB/s of bandwidth, which is shared with the integrated Radeon 8060S graphics.

Q: How does the CPU compare to the Intel Core i9-14900K?

A: The Ryzen AI Max+ 395 has an average benchmark score of 77,740, which is 1.7% lower than the Intel Core i9-14900K's average score of 79,097.

# Build Overview

This build pairs the AMD Ryzen AI Max+ 395, a 16-core Zen 5 mobile processor with a 95th percentile CPU ranking, with the NVIDIA RTX 5000 Mobile Ada Generation, a laptop GPU with a 21st percentile ranking. The build class is laptop, and the overall combined percentile is 58. This is a workstation-class mobile platform where the CPU is the dominant performer and the GPU serves as a capable but not exceptional companion. The CPU's 55 W TDP and the GPU's 120 W TDP indicate a system designed for sustained performance in a portable form factor, likely with robust cooling to handle the combined thermal load. The CPU's integrated Radeon 8060S graphics provides a low-power alternative for display tasks, while the discrete GPU activates for demanding workloads. The 16 GB VRAM on the GPU is a notable asset for content creation, and the 64 MB L3 cache on the CPU supports data-intensive applications. This is a build where the processor carries the system's performance identity, with the GPU providing modern features (ray tracing, tensor cores) at a mid-tier performance level.

# Who Should Build It

Target users for this CPU-GPU pairing are professionals and enthusiasts who prioritize CPU compute over graphics performance. Content creators working with video editing will benefit from the CPU's Cinebench R23 multi-core score of 35,314 and PassMark multithread score of 54,934, which speed up export and rendering workflows; the 16 GB GPU VRAM accommodates large project files, though GPU-accelerated effects will not top leaderboards. Software developers will find the 16-core, 32-thread configuration with 64 MB L3 cache ideal for parallel compilation and code analysis, supported by PassMark integer math at 200,665 and data compression at 690,650. Students and office workers in CPU-centric fields — such as data science, simulation, or engineering — will benefit from the high multi-threaded throughput for batch processing and model training, with the CPU's 95th percentile ranking ensuring fast task completion. Gamers at 1080p resolution who favor esports or older titles will find the GPU adequate, especially with the CPU's strong single-core performance (2,044 Cinebench R23 single-core) for high frame rates in CPU-bound games. However, gamers targeting 1440p or 4K with modern AAA titles should look elsewhere, as the GPU's 21st percentile ranking will force settings compromises. Small business workstations handling data analytics, financial modeling, or scientific computing will excel with this CPU's memory bandwidth (256 GB/s) and multi-core scores, making the system a strong fit for CPU-intensive professional workloads where the GPU is a secondary consideration.

Rate My PC: AMD Ryzen AI Max+ 395 + NVIDIA RTX 5000 Mobile Ada Generation

Power Build

System Balance Analysis

AMD Ryzen AI Max+ 395

NVIDIA RTX 5000 Mobile Ada Generation

Market Position

Game Performance Benchmarks

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

Performance Insights

Strong Performance

Performance Tiers Explained

Ultimate

High-End

Mid-Range

Entry Level

Legacy

4K Gaming Performance

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

1440p Gaming Performance

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

1080p Gaming Performance

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

Related Processors

Related Graphics Cards

Compare Your CPU

Compare Your GPU

Related PC Builds

Same CPU with Different GPUs

Same GPU with Different CPUs

Other Popular Builds