SYSTEM ANALYZER

Rate My PC: AMD Ryzen AI Max+ 395 + NVIDIA Quadro RTX 5000 Mobile

Get a comprehensive performance analysis of your gaming rig with detailed benchmarks, bottleneck detection, and upgrade recommendations

86 / 100
HIGH-END

Power Build

Top 14% of systems. Excellent for 1440p Ultra or 4K High gaming.

1440p Ultra4K High

System Balance Analysis

CPU vs GPU performance ratio
GPU Bottleneck
CPU
97%
VS
GPU
74%

Your GPU is limiting system performance. Consider upgrading to a more powerful graphics card to better utilize your CPU.

PROCESSOR

AMD Ryzen AI Max+ 395

77,740 Benchmark Score
Top 3% Market Ranking
View Full Specs →
GRAPHICS CARD

NVIDIA Quadro RTX 5000 Mobile

0 Benchmark Score
Top 26% Market Ranking
View Full Specs →

Market Position

How your build compares to others
Budget
0-30
Mid-Range
30-60
High-End
60-85
Enthusiast
85-100
Your Build

Game Performance Benchmarks

Real-world 4K FPS in popular titles
View All Games →

Performance Insights

Tips to maximize your system

Strong Performance

Excellent for 1440p gaming. Most games will run at high/ultra settings smoothly.

Bottleneck Detected

GPU Bottleneck - Upgrading the weaker component will improve overall performance.

Compatible Games See what you can play Compare CPUs Find upgrades Compare GPUs Find upgrades

Performance Tiers Explained

90-100

Ultimate

4K Ultra gaming, VR ready, ray tracing enabled, professional workloads

4K 60+ FPS VR Ready
70-89

High-End

1440p Ultra or 4K High settings, excellent for modern AAA titles

1440p Ultra 4K High
50-69

Mid-Range

1080p Ultra or 1440p Medium, great value for most gamers

1080p Ultra 1440p Med
30-49

Entry Level

1080p Medium settings, suitable for eSports and older titles

1080p Med eSports
0-29

Legacy

Basic gaming, older titles, consider upgrading for modern games

720p-1080p Low Older Games

This analysis covers a laptop build pairing the AMD Ryzen AI Max+ 395 processor with the NVIDIA Quadro RTX 5000 Mobile GPU. The CPU is a 16-core, 32-thread Zen 5 part with a base clock of 3.00 GHz and a boost clock of 5.10 GHz, while the GPU is a Turing-based workstation card with 16 GB of GDDR6 memory. The combined benchmark data places this configuration at the 73rd percentile overall, with the CPU at the 95th percentile and the GPU at the 50th percentile. No measured frame-rate data exists for this exact combination, so all gaming performance is estimated from the benchmark scores.

CPU Analysis

The AMD Ryzen AI Max+ 395 is built on the Zen 5 architecture (Strix Halo) using a 4 nm process from TSMC. It packs 16 cores and 32 threads, with a base clock of 3.00 GHz and a boost clock of 5.10 GHz. The cache hierarchy is substantial: 80 KB of L1 per core, 1 MB of L2 per core, and 64 MB of shared L3 cache. This configuration gives the CPU a strong foundation for both single-threaded responsiveness and heavy multi-threaded workloads.

In Cinebench R23, the CPU scores 35,314 points in multi-core and 2,044 in single-core. The multi-core result is especially telling: it places the Ryzen AI Max+ 395 in the top 5% of all CPUs, and it compares favorably against high-end desktop parts. The nearest rivals include the AMD Ryzen Threadripper PRO 9945WX, which the 395 leads by 1.6%, and the Intel Core i9-14900K, which leads the 395 by 1.7%. The CPU also outperforms the AMD Ryzen 9 8945HX by 2.0% and matches the AMD EPYC Embedded 8224P within 1.6%. These margins, while small, show that the Ryzen AI Max+ 395 can handle heavy compute tasks—video encoding, software compilation, and 3D rendering—without being a bottleneck.

Single-thread performance is similarly solid. The Cinebench R23 single-core score of 2,044 and Geekbench single-core score of 2,464 indicate strong per-core efficiency, which translates to snappy system response and good performance in lightly threaded applications. PassMark’s single-thread score of 4,147 reinforces this. The CPU also excels in specialized tasks: PassMark data compression reaches 690,650, encryption 35,455, and floating point math 128,682. The 95th percentile ranking across all CPUs means that in CPU-bound scenarios, this processor will outperform the vast majority of existing parts.

Balance and Bottleneck

The CPU sits at the 95th percentile while the GPU sits at the 50th percentile, and the combined percentile is 73. This large gap means the CPU is far more powerful relative to its peers than the GPU. In gaming or any GPU-accelerated workload, the Quadro RTX 5000 Mobile will be the primary limiting factor. The CPU has enough raw throughput to feed a faster GPU without being saturated, so the system will be GPU-limited in most graphics-heavy tasks.

The CPU’s 32 threads and 256 GB/s memory bandwidth are well suited for compute-heavy workloads like data compression and encryption. In contrast, the GPU’s 50th percentile suggests it delivers mid-range performance. For example, the GPU’s 16 GB of VRAM and 448 GB/s bandwidth are respectable, but they are not in the top tier of graphics hardware. When a task is heavily dependent on the GPU, such as real-time 3D rendering or high-resolution gaming, the GPU will constrain the overall system. Conversely, in CPU-bound workloads—like code compilation or physics simulations—the CPU can run at full tilt, and the GPU will not interfere.

Because there are no measured FPS data, the bottleneck assessment is based on percentile disparity. The CPU is clearly the stronger component; any performance gap in gaming or graphics-heavy applications will come from the GPU. The CPU’s high memory bandwidth also helps feed the GPU, but the GPU’s own bandwidth and compute capability will still cap frame rates.

Upgrade Path and Platform

The CPU uses AMD Socket FP11, a mobile socket, and the system is classified as a laptop. This form factor limits conventional upgrades: the CPU and GPU are integrated into a single chassis, and there is no desktop-style expansion. Memory is LPDDR5X, which is typically soldered, and the system supports quad-channel memory with 256 GB/s of bandwidth. ECC memory is supported, a feature useful for professional and scientific work.

The CPU provides PCIe Gen 4 with 16 lanes, while the GPU uses PCIe 3.0 x16. This means the GPU’s bandwidth is capped by its older interface, but the CPU has headroom for future peripherals that require Gen 4. The TDP of the CPU is 55 W, and the GPU is 110 W, giving a combined 165 W. There is no suggested PSU value in the data, but for a laptop, the power delivery is handled by the internal battery and charger.

Given that the GPU is end-of-life and has a successor, the Ampere-MW, a sensible next upgrade would be to a newer GPU generation—but that would require a new laptop or a different chassis. The CPU itself is current and active, so the platform is not outdated from a processor standpoint. The upgrade path is effectively limited to external devices via PCIe and memory expansion is not possible. In a desktop context, one could pair this CPU with a more powerful GPU, but in the laptop form factor, the system must be used as-is.

FAQ

Q: What is the core and thread count of the AMD Ryzen AI Max+ 395?

A: It has 16 cores and 32 threads.

Q: How much L3 cache does the CPU have?

A: The CPU has 64 MB of shared L3 cache.

Q: What is the GPU’s memory size and type?

A: The NVIDIA Quadro RTX 5000 Mobile has 16 GB of GDDR6 memory on a 256-bit bus.

Q: Does the GPU support hardware ray tracing?

A: Yes, it has 48 RT cores and 384 tensor cores, and it supports DirectX 12 Ultimate.

Q: How does the CPU compare to the Intel Core i9-14900K in average benchmark score?

A: The Ryzen AI Max+ 395 is 1.7% slower than the i9-14900K.

Q: What is the combined percentile of this laptop configuration?

A: The combined percentile is 73rd.

Q: What is the CPU’s TDP?

A: The CPU TDP is 55 W.

Who Should Build It

This laptop configuration is best suited for users who need a very strong CPU but can accept a mid-range GPU. The CPU’s 95th percentile and 32 threads make it ideal for software developers, data analysts, and content creators who work with large codebases, compile frequently, or run multi-threaded scripts. The Cinebench R23 multi-core score of 35,314 indicates the CPU can handle long render sessions and heavy parallel workloads.

Gamers at 1080p or 1440p with medium to high settings will find the GPU adequate. The 16 GB VRAM and 448 GB/s bandwidth can support modern textures and high resolutions, but the GPU’s 50th percentile means it will not deliver top-tier frame rates at 4K. For users who primarily play competitive titles at lower resolutions, the CPU’s single-core speed (2,044 in Cinebench R23) will keep frame times low.

The 4 nm process and 55 W TDP make it a reasonable choice for professionals who need a mobile workstation with high CPU throughput. The support for ECC memory and quad-channel LPDDR5X adds reliability for scientific and financial computing. Students in engineering or computer science will benefit from the CPU’s multi-threaded performance for compiling and running simulations, while the GPU can handle basic CAD or video editing.

Usage Scenarios

High-refresh gaming: The CPU is strong enough to handle any game, but the GPU’s 50th percentile will limit frame rates at high refresh. The 16 GB VRAM helps with large textures, but the GPU will likely cap frame rates at 1080p medium to high settings.

Streaming: The 32-thread CPU can handle encoding and decoding tasks alongside gaming without significant impact. The GPU’s 50th percentile may reduce in-game performance, but the CPU’s Cinebench R23 score of 35,314 suggests it can manage streaming workloads.

Video editing: The CPU’s 95th percentile and 64 MB L3 cache make timeline scrubbing and render tasks fast. The GPU’s 9.4 TFLOPS FP32 performance helps with effects and color grading, though not at the highest tier.

3D rendering: The CPU’s high multi-core score (35,314) is ideal for CPU-based renderers, while the GPU’s 48 RT cores and 384 tensor cores provide some ray tracing and AI acceleration, but the GPU’s 50th percentile means it will not lead in this area.

Software development: The 32 threads and high single-core performance (2,044 in Cinebench R23) make compilation and code analysis fast. The 256 GB/s memory bandwidth helps with large data sets.

Student and office work: The CPU’s single-core 2,044 and 4,147 PassMark score handle typical office applications, web browsing, and document editing with ease. The GPU’s 16 GB VRAM is overkill for office tasks, but the system is capable.

GPU Analysis

The NVIDIA Quadro RTX 5000 Mobile is a Turing-based GPU with 3,072 shading units, 192 texture units, and 64 ROPs. It has 48 RT cores and 384 tensor cores, which support ray tracing and AI-accelerated workflows. The base clock is 1,035 MHz and boost clock is 1,530 MHz, with memory running at 1,750 MHz (14 Gbps effective). The 16 GB of GDDR6 is on a 256-bit bus, yielding 448 GB/s of bandwidth.

The GPU’s pixel rate is 97.92 GPixel/s and texture rate is 293.8 GTexel/s. FP32 performance is 9.4 TFLOPS, and FP16 is 18.8 TFLOPS (2:1). These figures place the GPU in the middle of the performance distribution; its 50th percentile means it is neither a low-end nor a high-end part. The GPU supports DirectX 12 Ultimate, OpenGL 4.6, and Vulkan 1.4. It uses a PCIe 3.0 x16 interface and has a TDP of 110 W. The GPU is end-of-life, with a successor, Ampere-MW, but the data shows it still holds a mid-range position.

Because the GPU’s benchmark array is empty, the 50th percentile is the only direct performance indicator. The 16 GB VRAM and 448 GB/s bandwidth are generous for a laptop GPU, which suggests it can handle 1440p gaming and moderate 3D rendering. The presence of RT and tensor cores allows for ray-traced effects and AI-based features, though the 50th percentile indicates that these features will run at modest speed.

Build Overview

This is a laptop build that pairs a top-tier CPU with a mid-tier GPU. The CPU’s 95th percentile is exceptional, while the GPU’s 50th percentile is exactly average. The combined percentile of 73 means the system overall is above the majority of all configurations, but not in the top tier. The CPU’s 16 cores and 32 threads make it a workstation-class processor, while the GPU’s 16 GB VRAM and 448 GB/s bandwidth support professional and gaming workloads, but without the top-end performance of a high-end desktop GPU.

Benchmark Performance

The CPU’s average benchmark score is 77,740, which ranks it in the 95th percentile. In Cinebench R23, it scores 35,314 multi-core and 2,044 single-core. Geekbench yields 20,992 multi-core and 2,464 single-core. PassMark multithread is 54,934 and single-thread is 4,147. These numbers confirm the CPU is a leading mobile processor.

The GPU has no published benchmark scores, but its percentile is 50. This means it is exactly in the middle of all GPUs. The combined percentile of the system is 73, which is driven by the CPU’s high standing. The CPU’s nearest rivals include the AMD Ryzen Threadripper PRO 9945WX (1.6% slower) and the Intel Core i9-14900K (1.7% faster). The CPU’s average benchmark score is 77,740, while the Threadripper PRO 9945WX scores 76,513, and the i9-14900K scores 79,097.

The combined picture is a system that excels in CPU-bound tasks but is constrained by the GPU. The CPU is among the best, while the GPU is average. This makes the system ideal for productivity and computing workloads, but it will not match high-end gaming laptops in raw graphics performance.

Gaming Performance

No measured FPS rows exist for this exact combination—the FACT PACK contains no measuredFps data. Therefore, all gaming performance here is estimated from the CPU and GPU benchmark scores. The GPU’s 50th percentile and 16 GB of VRAM suggest it can handle modern games at 1080p with high settings and 1440p at medium settings. The CPU’s high single-core score (2,044 in Cinebench R23) ensures that it will not be a bottleneck in most games. The GPU’s 448 GB/s bandwidth is sufficient for texture-heavy titles, and the 48 RT cores and 384 tensor cores enable ray tracing and DLSS-like features, though the mid-range tier means these features will be effective only at moderate resolutions.

For competitive titles that rely on CPU speed, the system will perform well. For AAA games at 4K, the GPU will likely struggle to maintain high frame rates. The 50th percentile suggests that it is comparable to other mid-range laptop GPUs, so users should expect solid 1080p performance but not top-tier 4K. Without measured data, these are estimates based on the GPU’s relative ranking and its specifications.