SYSTEM ANALYZER

Rate My PC: AMD Ryzen AI Max+ 395 + NVIDIA Quadro RTX 3000 Mobile

Get a comprehensive performance analysis of your gaming rig with detailed benchmarks, bottleneck detection, and upgrade recommendations

87 / 100
HIGH-END

Power Build

Top 13% of systems. Excellent for 1440p Ultra or 4K High gaming.

1440p Ultra4K High

System Balance Analysis

CPU vs GPU performance ratio
GPU Bottleneck
CPU
97%
VS
GPU
76%

Your GPU is limiting system performance. Consider upgrading to a more powerful graphics card to better utilize your CPU.

PROCESSOR

AMD Ryzen AI Max+ 395

77,740 Benchmark Score
Top 3% Market Ranking
View Full Specs →
GRAPHICS CARD

NVIDIA Quadro RTX 3000 Mobile

1,285 Benchmark Score
Top 24% Market Ranking
View Full Specs →

Market Position

How your build compares to others
Budget
0-30
Mid-Range
30-60
High-End
60-85
Enthusiast
85-100
Your Build

Game Performance Benchmarks

Real-world 4K FPS in popular titles
View All Games →

Performance Insights

Tips to maximize your system

Strong Performance

Excellent for 1440p gaming. Most games will run at high/ultra settings smoothly.

Bottleneck Detected

GPU Bottleneck - Upgrading the weaker component will improve overall performance.

Compatible Games See what you can play Compare CPUs Find upgrades Compare GPUs Find upgrades

Performance Tiers Explained

90-100

Ultimate

4K Ultra gaming, VR ready, ray tracing enabled, professional workloads

4K 60+ FPS VR Ready
70-89

High-End

1440p Ultra or 4K High settings, excellent for modern AAA titles

1440p Ultra 4K High
50-69

Mid-Range

1080p Ultra or 1440p Medium, great value for most gamers

1080p Ultra 1440p Med
30-49

Entry Level

1080p Medium settings, suitable for eSports and older titles

1080p Med eSports
0-29

Legacy

Basic gaming, older titles, consider upgrading for modern games

720p-1080p Low Older Games

# AMD Ryzen AI Max+ 395 + NVIDIA Quadro RTX 3000 Mobile

This pairing combines AMD's top-tier mobile Zen 5 processor with NVIDIA's professional Turing-based graphics solution, creating a laptop configuration that sits at the 51st percentile overall among all build combinations. The CPU is a 16-core, 32-thread powerhouse that ranks in the 95th percentile against all processors, while the GPU is a 6 GB professional mobile part that ranks in only the 7th percentile against all GPUs. The data shows a profound performance asymmetry: the processor is a high-end workstation-class component, while the graphics solution is a modest professional part designed for portability and certification rather than raw gaming throughput.

GPU Analysis — VRAM, bandwidth, clocks, RT/tensor hardware, what the benchmark scores mean for rendering

The NVIDIA Quadro RTX 3000 Mobile is built on the TU106 chip using the Turing architecture on a 12 nm TSMC process, with 10,800 million transistors on a 445 mm² die. It operates at a base clock of 945 MHz and a boost clock of 1380 MHz, with memory running at 1750 MHz (14 Gbps effective). The GPU has 6 GB of GDDR6 memory on a 192-bit bus, delivering 336.0 GB/s of bandwidth. This memory configuration is adequate for professional 1080p workloads and light 4K texture sets, but the 6 GB capacity will limit scene complexity in modern rendering applications.

The GPU features 1920 shading units, 120 texture mapping units, and 64 raster operation units. The pixel rate is 88.32 GPixel/s and the texture rate is 165.6 GTexel/s. FP32 compute is rated at 5.299 TFLOPS, with FP16 at 10.60 TFLOPS (2:1 ratio). For ray tracing, the card includes 30 RT cores, and for AI acceleration, it has 240 tensor cores. The API support includes DirectX 12 Ultimate (12_2), OpenGL 4.6, and Vulkan 1.4, making it capable of running modern graphics APIs.

The single benchmark score available is 3DMark Steel Nomad DX12 with a score of 1285. This places the GPU in the 7th percentile against all GPUs. The nearest rivals in this benchmark are the NVIDIA GeForce GT 610 (score 1281, 0.3% slower), the AMD Radeon R9 380 (score 1293, 0.6% faster), the NVIDIA GeForce GT 520 (score 1267, 1.4% slower), and the NVIDIA NVS 4200M (score 1267, 1.4% slower). The data clearly indicates that this GPU is not competitive with modern gaming graphics solutions; it is roughly on par with entry-level discrete GPUs from over a decade ago in this specific DX12 test.

For rendering workloads, the Quadro RTX 3000 Mobile's professional driver certification and 6 GB VRAM make it suitable for CAD, 3D modeling, and visualization tasks that require certified drivers. The 30 RT cores provide hardware-accelerated ray tracing, though the raw compute throughput of 5.299 TFLOPS FP32 is modest by current standards. The 240 tensor cores enable DLSS and AI-accelerated workflows, but the overall performance envelope is constrained by the 80 W TDP and the Turing architecture's age.

Balance and Bottleneck — which component limits which workload, using percentiles and FPS scaling as evidence

The balance between the AMD Ryzen AI Max+ 395 and the NVIDIA Quadro RTX 3000 Mobile is heavily skewed toward the CPU. The processor sits at the 95th percentile against all CPUs, while the GPU sits at the 7th percentile against all GPUs. This creates a situation where the CPU is never the limiting factor in graphics-bound workloads; the GPU will bottleneck gaming and real-time rendering performance by a wide margin.

In gaming workloads, the GPU's 1285 Steel Nomad score indicates that frame rates will be limited by graphics processing, not by the CPU's ability to feed the render pipeline. The CPU's multi-threaded capabilities, evidenced by a Cinebench R23 multi-core score of 35314, far exceed what any gaming workload requires at the GPU's performance level. For 1080p gaming, the Quadro RTX 3000 Mobile will be the primary constraint, while the CPU remains largely idle in terms of its full potential.

In compute-heavy workloads such as 3D rendering, video encoding, or software compilation, the CPU will take the lead role. The Ryzen AI Max+ 395's 54934 Passmark multi-thread score and 690650 Passmark data compression score indicate exceptional throughput for parallel processing tasks. Here, the GPU's modest FP32 throughput of 5.299 TFLOPS may still be a secondary bottleneck for GPU-accelerated rendering, but the CPU can handle CPU-based rendering workloads without any bottleneck from the GPU.

The combined percentile of 51 reflects this asymmetry — the system is neither a balanced high-performance build nor a low-end one, but rather a hybrid where the CPU pulls the overall rating up while the GPU drags it down. The pair rank by FPS is null in the data, and there are no measured FPS rows for this combination, so frame rate expectations must be estimated from the benchmark scores.

CPU Analysis — cores, clocks, architecture, what the benchmark scores mean for real workloads

The AMD Ryzen AI Max+ 395 is a 16-core, 32-thread mobile processor based on the Zen 5 architecture, codenamed Strix Halo. It is manufactured on TSMC's 4 nm process node with a die size of 2x 70.6 mm². The base clock is 3.00 GHz with a boost clock of 5.10 GHz. The TDP is 55 W, which is remarkably efficient for a 16-core mobile part. The processor uses the AMD Socket FP11 and supports LPDDR5X memory on a quad-channel bus with a memory bandwidth of 256.0 GB/s, with ECC memory support available.

The cache hierarchy includes 80 KB of L1 cache per core, 1 MB of L2 cache per core, and 64 MB of shared L3 cache. The PCIe support is Gen 4 with 16 lanes (CPU only). The integrated graphics is the Radeon 8060S, which provides a fallback for display output when the discrete GPU is not in use. The processor was released on January 5, 2025, and is currently in active production. The multiplier is locked, so overclocking is not possible on this part.

Benchmark scores for the Ryzen AI Max+ 395 are uniformly strong. In Cinebench R15, it scores 5463 multi-core and 316 single-core. In Cinebench R23, it scores 35314 multi-core and 2044 single-core. Geekbench results show 20992 multi-core and 2464 single-core. Passmark results include a multi-thread score of 54934, a single-thread score of 4147, integer math at 200665, floating-point math at 128682, data encryption at 35455, data compression at 690650, extended instructions at 56346, physics at 3481, random string sorting at 76177, and find prime numbers at 303.

The average benchmark score is 77740, placing the CPU in the 95th percentile against all CPUs. Nearest rivals include the AMD Ryzen Threadripper PRO 9945WX (avg score 76513, 1.6% slower), the AMD EPYC Embedded 8224P (avg score 76492, 1.6% slower), the Intel Core i9-14900K (avg score 79097, 1.7% faster), and the AMD Ryzen 9 8945HX (avg score 76212, 2% slower). This positions the Ryzen AI Max+ 395 in flagship desktop territory despite being a mobile part, making it suitable for demanding multi-threaded workloads like video rendering, scientific computing, and large-scale software builds.

For real workloads, the CPU's 64 MB of L3 cache and high memory bandwidth of 256.0 GB/s benefit database operations, data compression, and large in-memory datasets. The Passmark data compression score of 690650 is particularly notable, indicating strong performance for archival and compression tasks. The floating-point math score of 128682 supports scientific and engineering simulations, while the integer math score of 200665 supports general productivity and code compilation.

FAQ

Q: What is the CPU's core and thread count?

A: The AMD Ryzen AI Max+ 395 has 16 cores and 32 threads, based on the Zen 5 architecture.

Q: How does the GPU compare to its nearest rivals in 3DMark Steel Nomad DX12?

A: The Quadro RTX 3000 Mobile scores 1285, which is 0.3% higher than the GeForce GT 610 (1281), 0.6% lower than the Radeon R9 380 (1293), and 1.4% higher than both the GeForce GT 520 and NVS 4200M (both 1267).

Q: What memory type and bandwidth does the CPU support?

A: The CPU supports LPDDR5X memory on a quad-channel bus with 256.0 GB/s of memory bandwidth, and ECC memory is supported.

Q: What is the GPU's VRAM capacity and memory bandwidth?

A: The GPU has 6 GB of GDDR6 memory on a 192-bit bus with 336.0 GB/s of bandwidth.

Q: Is the GPU still in production?

A: No, the NVIDIA Quadro RTX 3000 Mobile is end-of-life, with a release date of May 26, 2019, and its successor is Ampere-MW.

Q: What is the CPU's percentile ranking among all processors?

A: The CPU is in the 95th percentile against all CPUs, with an average benchmark score of 77740.

Q: Does the GPU support hardware ray tracing?

A: Yes, the GPU has 30 RT cores for hardware-accelerated ray tracing, along with 240 tensor cores for AI acceleration.

Benchmark Performance — exact CPU and GPU scores, percentile positions, and what the combined picture is

The CPU's exact benchmark scores are as follows: Cinebench R15 multi-core 5463, Cinebench R15 single-core 316, Cinebench R23 multi-core 35314, Cinebench R23 single-core 2044, Geekbench multi-core 20992, Geekbench single-core 2464, Passmark multi-thread 54934, Passmark single-thread 4147, Passmark integer math 200665, Passmark floating-point math 128682, Passmark data encryption 35455, Passmark data compression 690650, Passmark extended instructions 56346, Passmark physics 3481, Passmark random string sorting 76177, and Passmark find prime numbers 303. The average benchmark score is 77740, placing it in the 95th percentile against all CPUs.

The GPU has a single benchmark score: 3DMark Steel Nomad DX12 at 1285, placing it in the 7th percentile against all GPUs. The combined percentile for this CPU+GPU pairing is 51, which indicates a mid-tier overall system despite the CPU's exceptional performance.

The combined picture is one of stark contrast: the CPU performs at a level comparable to high-end desktop processors like the Intel Core i9-14900K (which is 1.7% faster in average benchmark score), while the GPU performs at a level comparable to entry-level discrete GPUs from the early 2010s. The system's overall percentile of 51 reflects this imbalance, with the CPU lifting the score and the GPU pulling it down. For workloads that are CPU-bound, this system will excel; for workloads that are GPU-bound, it will underperform relative to the CPU's capabilities.

Upgrade Path and Platform — socket, memory support, PCIe, PSU headroom from suggestedPsu/tdp, what a sensible next upgrade looks like

The CPU uses the AMD Socket FP11, which is a mobile socket, so the upgrade path is limited to replacing the entire laptop rather than swapping the processor. The CPU supports LPDDR5X memory on a quad-channel bus with 256.0 GB/s bandwidth, and ECC memory is supported. The PCIe interface is Gen 4 with 16 lanes (CPU only), which provides sufficient bandwidth for modern NVMe storage and discrete GPUs.

The GPU is an MXM Module with no power connectors, and its TDP is 80 W. The CPU's TDP is 55 W, giving a combined TDP of 135 W for the CPU and GPU alone. The suggested PSU is null in the data, but the combined TDP suggests that a laptop power adapter in the 150-200 W range would be appropriate. The GPU's bus interface is PCIe 3.0 x16, which is backward compatible with the CPU's PCIe Gen 4 lanes, though the GPU will operate at PCIe 3.0 speeds.

A sensible next upgrade for this platform would be to replace the GPU with a more modern mobile graphics solution, but the MXM form factor limits options to compatible modules. Since the GPU is end-of-life (released May 26, 2019) and the CPU was released January 5, 2025, the platform is generational mismatch. The CPU's integrated Radeon 8060S graphics may actually outperform the discrete Quadro RTX 3000 Mobile in some workloads, though the data does not include direct comparisons. For users needing better GPU performance, the most practical upgrade path is to move to a newer laptop platform that pairs a similar CPU with a contemporary GPU.

Who Should Build It — target users and industries tied to measured performance

The primary target users for this configuration are professionals who need exceptional CPU compute power for multi-threaded workloads but do not require high-end GPU performance. The CPU's 95th percentile ranking and 16-core/32-thread configuration make it ideal for software developers compiling large codebases, data scientists running parallel computations, and researchers performing numerical simulations. The Passmark multi-thread score of 54934 and the Geekbench multi-core score of 20992 demonstrate the CPU's capability in these areas.

Content creators who work primarily with CPU-based rendering will benefit from this configuration. The Cinebench R23 multi-core score of 35314 supports fast CPU rendering in applications like Blender (Cycles CPU mode) or Cinema 4D. The data compression score of 690650 also benefits video editing workflows that involve heavy codec processing. However, GPU-accelerated effects and rendering will be limited by the Quadro RTX 3000 Mobile's modest performance.

Students and small business workstations that need a powerful processor for productivity tasks such as spreadsheet analysis, database management, and virtualization will find the CPU well-suited. The Passmark integer math score of 200665 and the data encryption score of 35455 support these workloads. The ECC memory support adds reliability for long-running computation tasks.

Gamers are not the intended audience for this build. The GPU's 7th percentile ranking and 1285 Steel Nomad score indicate that gaming performance will be below modern entry-level standards. Users who prioritize gaming should look elsewhere, as the CPU's power will be wasted in GPU-bound gaming scenarios.

Build Overview — what this CPU+GPU pairing is, its class, and overall tier from the percentiles

This is a laptop-class build (buildClass: laptop) that pairs the AMD Ryzen AI Max+ 395, a 16-core Zen 5 mobile processor, with the NVIDIA Quadro RTX 3000 Mobile, a Turing-based professional mobile GPU. The CPU is a flagship-tier mobile processor in the 95th percentile against all CPUs, while the GPU is a low-tier professional part in the 7th percentile against all GPUs. The combined percentile is 51, placing this system in the middle of the overall performance distribution.

The build is best described as a CPU-centric workstation laptop. The processor outperforms the AMD Ryzen Threadripper PRO 9945WX by 1.6% and the AMD EPYC Embedded 8224P by 1.6% in average benchmark score, while trailing the Intel Core i9-14900K by 1.7%. The GPU, meanwhile, is on par with the NVIDIA GeForce GT 610 (0.3% slower) and the AMD Radeon R9 380 (0.6% faster). This is a configuration for users who need maximum CPU throughput in a mobile form factor and can tolerate limited graphics capability.

Gaming Performance — measured FPS by game and resolution

The FACT PACK contains no measured FPS data for this exact combination. No measuredFps rows exist, and the dataIsMeasured field is false. Therefore, all frame rate expectations must be estimated from the benchmark scores.

Based on the GPU's 3DMark Steel Nomad DX12 score of 1285, which places it in the 7th percentile against all GPUs and on par with the GeForce GT 610 and Radeon R9 380, gaming performance is expected to be very modest. At 1080p resolution with ultra settings, the Quadro RTX 3000 Mobile would likely struggle to maintain playable frame rates in modern AAA titles. The 6 GB VRAM and 336.0 GB/s bandwidth are sufficient for 1080p textures, but the 5.299 TFLOPS FP32 compute is a limiting factor for modern game rendering.

At 720p or with reduced settings, the GPU could potentially deliver playable frame rates in older or less demanding titles. The 30 RT cores provide some ray tracing capability, but the overall compute throughput is too low for meaningful ray-traced gaming at acceptable frame rates. The CPU's exceptional performance means that frame rates will be entirely GPU-limited; the Ryzen AI Max+ 395 has more than enough headroom to feed any frame rate the GPU can produce.

Usage Scenarios — grounded in the scores

High-refresh gaming: This scenario is not recommended. The GPU's 1285 Steel Nomad score and 7th percentile ranking indicate that frame rates will be far below what high-refresh displays require. The CPU's 2044 Cinebench R23 single-core score ensures no CPU bottleneck, but the GPU's 5.299 TFLOPS FP32 throughput is insufficient for high-refresh 1080p gaming in modern titles.

Streaming: The CPU's 16 cores and 32 threads, evidenced by a Cinebench R23 multi-core score of 35314, provide ample headroom for software encoding while gaming. The Passmark data compression score of 690650 supports efficient stream encoding. The GPU's modest gaming performance will limit the gaming side, but the CPU can handle x264/x265 encoding at high quality settings without impacting gameplay.

Video editing: CPU-based editing workflows will benefit from the 54934 Passmark multi-thread score and 20992 Geekbench multi-core score. Timeline scrubbing, effects processing, and export encoding will be fast. GPU-accelerated effects will be limited by the Quadro RTX 3000 Mobile's 5.299 TFLOPS FP32 and 6 GB VRAM, but the CPU can handle most editing tasks without GPU assistance.

3D rendering: The CPU excels at CPU-based rendering. The 35314 Cinebench R23 multi-core score and 128682 Passmark floating-point math score support rendering engines that use the CPU. GPU-accelerated rendering will be slow due to the GPU's low compute throughput and 6 GB VRAM, but the 30 RT cores provide some hardware ray tracing capability. The 64 MB L3 cache helps with complex scenes.

Software development: This is a strong scenario. The 200665 Passmark integer math score and 34981 Passmark physics score support fast compilation and testing. The 16 cores and 32 threads allow for parallel builds, and the 256.0 GB/s memory bandwidth reduces compilation bottleneck. The 95th percentile CPU ranking means build times will be among the fastest in mobile computing.

Student and office work: The CPU's 4147 Passmark single-thread score ensures responsive everyday performance. The integrated Radeon 8060S graphics provides a backup display solution, and the ECC memory support adds reliability for long-running spreadsheet and database tasks. The 55 W CPU TDP contributes to battery efficiency, though the GPU's 80 W TDP is a consideration for portable use.