SYSTEM ANALYZER

Rate My PC: AMD Ryzen AI Max+ 395 + NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Mobile

Get a comprehensive performance analysis of your gaming rig with detailed benchmarks, bottleneck detection, and upgrade recommendations

94 / 100
ULTIMATE READY

Apex Performer

Top 6% of systems. Capable of 4K Ultra gaming and advanced rendering.

4K 60+ FPSVR ReadyRay Tracing

System Balance Analysis

CPU vs GPU performance ratio
Well Balanced
CPU
97%
VS
GPU
92%
PROCESSOR

AMD Ryzen AI Max+ 395

77,740 Benchmark Score
Top 3% Market Ranking
View Full Specs →
GRAPHICS CARD

NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Mobile

22,729 Benchmark Score
Top 8% Market Ranking
View Full Specs →

Market Position

How your build compares to others
Budget
0-30
Mid-Range
30-60
High-End
60-85
Enthusiast
85-100
Your Build

Game Performance Benchmarks

Real-world 4K FPS in popular titles
View All Games →

Performance Insights

Tips to maximize your system

Optimal Performance

Your system is in the top tier. You can run any modern game at maximum settings.

4K Gaming Ready

Consider a 4K 144Hz monitor to fully utilize your hardware capabilities.

Compatible Games See what you can play Compare CPUs Find upgrades Compare GPUs Find upgrades

Performance Tiers Explained

90-100

Ultimate

4K Ultra gaming, VR ready, ray tracing enabled, professional workloads

4K 60+ FPS VR Ready
70-89

High-End

1440p Ultra or 4K High settings, excellent for modern AAA titles

1440p Ultra 4K High
50-69

Mid-Range

1080p Ultra or 1440p Medium, great value for most gamers

1080p Ultra 1440p Med
30-49

Entry Level

1080p Medium settings, suitable for eSports and older titles

1080p Med eSports
0-29

Legacy

Basic gaming, older titles, consider upgrading for modern games

720p-1080p Low Older Games

The AMD Ryzen AI Max+ 395 and NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Mobile pairing represents a distinct laptop configuration that combines a high-end 16-core processor with a mid-range mobile GPU. The benchmark data reveals a system where the CPU’s compute potential significantly outstrips the GPU’s rendering capabilities, creating a specific performance profile that favors productivity and esports over demanding AAA gaming at high resolutions. This analysis examines the measured frame rates, platform characteristics, and workload suitability of this combination.

Gaming Performance

The measured FPS data at ultra settings paints a clear picture of a system optimized for high-refresh-rate esports and competitive titles at 1080p, with capabilities that taper off quickly as resolution increases. At 1920x1080, the system delivers exceptional performance in popular competitive shooters: Valorant reaches 376 FPS, Counter-Strike: Global Offensive hits 362 FPS, and Counter-Strike 2 achieves 164 FPS. Tom Clancy's Rainbow Six Siege also performs strongly at 195 FPS, and Call of Duty: Warzone runs at 162 FPS. These figures indicate that the pairing is more than sufficient for 144Hz or even 240Hz displays in these genres.

However, the data shows a significant drop-off when moving to more graphically demanding titles. At 1080p, Red Dead Redemption 2 runs at only 44 FPS, Ark: Survival Ascended at 24 FPS, and The Medium at 34 FPS. These numbers suggest that the RTX 4060 Mobile becomes the primary limiting factor in visually intensive games, struggling to maintain smooth framerates even at the lowest resolution tested. The pattern continues at 1440p, where Control drops to 52 FPS, Grand Theft Auto V to 50 FPS, and Outriders to 54 FPS, while Ark: Survival Ascended falls to just 15 FPS.

At 3840x2160, the system’s limitations become pronounced. Call of Duty: Warzone remains playable at 122 FPS, and Valorant still achieves 256 FPS, but most titles fall below acceptable thresholds. Red Dead Redemption 2 runs at 22 FPS, Control at 35 FPS, and Ark: Survival Ascended at a mere 8 FPS. The average FPS across all tested games is 113.8, but this figure is heavily influenced by the high performance in light esports titles. For AAA gaming, the practical ceiling appears to be 1080p with settings lowered from ultra, or 1440p for less demanding games.

Upgrade Path and Platform

The platform is built around AMD Socket FP11, which is designed for the mobile Strix Halo architecture. The CPU supports LPDDR5X memory across a quad-channel bus, providing 256.0 GB/s of memory bandwidth. This high-bandwidth configuration benefits both the CPU and the integrated Radeon 8060S graphics, though the discrete RTX 4060 Mobile has its own dedicated memory. The CPU also supports ECC memory, a feature typically associated with workstation-class systems.

PCIe connectivity is limited to Gen 4 with 16 lanes from the CPU, while the GPU connects via PCIe 4.0 x8. This is a laptop platform, meaning upgrades are generally restricted to memory and storage rather than CPU or GPU swaps. The CPU’s TDP is 55 watts, while the GPU has a 115-watt TDP, and no suggested PSU is listed because the system relies on the laptop’s internal power delivery. The 4nm CPU and 5nm GPU are both produced by TSMC, indicating a modern, power-efficient foundation.

A sensible next upgrade for this platform would focus on maximizing the existing hardware. Given the CPU’s strength, adding more LPDDR5X memory or faster storage would be the most practical improvements. The primary constraint is the GPU, but since it is soldered in a laptop, users would need to consider a completely new system to gain meaningful GPU performance. The platform’s PCIe Gen 4 support ensures that any current NVMe SSD will operate at full speed.

Usage Scenarios

High-refresh gaming: This is the system’s strongest suit. The measured data shows 376 FPS in Valorant and 362 FPS in CS:GO at 1080p, making it ideal for competitive gamers who prioritize frame rates over visual fidelity. The 164 FPS in Counter-Strike 2 and 195 FPS in Rainbow Six Siege further confirm this strength.

Streaming: The 16-core, 32-thread CPU provides substantial headroom for encoding while gaming. The Cinebench R23 multicore score of 35314 and Geekbench multicore score of 20992 indicate that the CPU can handle simultaneous gaming and streaming workloads without significant impact on either, though the GPU’s NVENC encoder is also available.

Video editing: The CPU’s Passmark multithread score of 54934 and floating-point math score of 128682 suggest strong performance in rendering and effects. The 64 MB of L3 cache and 256.0 GB/s memory bandwidth support large project files and timeline scrubbing. The GPU’s 8 GB VRAM is adequate for 1080p editing but may be limiting for 4K timelines.

3D rendering: The CPU excels in this workload, with a Cinebench R15 multicore score of 5463 and R23 score of 35314. The GPU’s 11.61 TFLOPS FP32 performance and 24 RT cores provide moderate acceleration for GPU-based renderers, but the CPU will likely be the faster path for most render engines.

Software development: The 16 cores and 32 threads handle compilation and parallel build tasks efficiently. The Passmark integer math score of 200665 and data compression score of 690650 indicate strong performance in code compilation and data processing. The single-thread score of 4147 also ensures responsive IDE performance.

Student and office work: This configuration is overpowered for basic productivity. The CPU’s 95th percentile ranking among all CPUs means it will breeze through document editing, spreadsheets, and web browsing. The GPU is unnecessary for these tasks, but the system’s overall capability ensures long-term relevance.

Who Should Build It

The target user is a gamer who primarily plays competitive esports titles at 1080p and wants a laptop that can also handle demanding productivity workloads. The data shows exceptional performance in Valorant (376 FPS), CS:GO (362 FPS), and Rainbow Six Siege (195 FPS) at 1080p, making it ideal for players who participate in tournaments or ranked play.

Content creators who work with video editing and 3D rendering will benefit from the CPU’s multicore strength. The Cinebench R23 multicore score of 35314 and Geekbench multicore score of 20992 place this processor in the top 5% of all CPUs, meaning rendering tasks will complete quickly. The GPU’s 8 GB VRAM and 256.0 GB/s bandwidth support moderate GPU-accelerated workloads.

Software developers compiling large codebases will appreciate the 16 cores and 32 threads. The Passmark integer math score of 200665 and multithread score of 54934 directly translate to faster build times. The CPU’s 95th percentile ranking ensures it will not be a bottleneck. Students and professionals in STEM fields who run simulations or data analysis will also find the CPU performance valuable, though the GPU is more than sufficient for their needs.

Small business workstations that need to handle a mix of office productivity, light video editing, and occasional gaming would find this configuration well-suited. The CPU’s ECC memory support adds reliability for data-sensitive work. The system’s overall 81st percentile combined ranking indicates it outperforms the majority of laptop configurations.

CPU Analysis

The AMD Ryzen AI Max+ 395 is a 16-core, 32-thread processor based on the Zen 5 architecture, codenamed Strix Halo. It operates at a base clock of 3.00 GHz and boosts up to 5.10 GHz, manufactured on TSMC’s 4nm process. The chip features a complex cache hierarchy with 80 KB of L1 per core, 1 MB of L2 per core, and 64 MB of shared L3 cache, the latter being substantial for a mobile processor.

The benchmark scores demonstrate the CPU’s exceptional multicore capability. The Cinebench R23 multicore score of 35314 places it in the 95th percentile of all CPUs, with an average benchmark score of 77740. Its nearest rivals include the AMD Ryzen Threadripper PRO 9945WX (1.6% faster), AMD EPYC Embedded 8224P (1.6% faster), and Intel Core i9-14900K (1.7% faster). This places the mobile chip in direct competition with desktop flagship processors.

The single-thread performance is also strong, with a Geekbench single-core score of 2464 and Cinebench R23 single-core score of 2044. The Passmark single-thread score of 4147 confirms that the architecture delivers excellent per-core efficiency. The data compression score of 690650 and encryption score of 35455 highlight strengths in data-intensive workloads, while the floating-point math score of 128682 indicates robust scientific computing capability.

The 256.0 GB/s memory bandwidth from the quad-channel LPDDR5X configuration is a key differentiator. This bandwidth is critical for feeding the 16 cores and also benefits the integrated Radeon 8060S graphics. The 55-watt TDP is relatively efficient for this level of performance, making it suitable for high-end laptops where thermal headroom is limited.

GPU Analysis

The NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Mobile is based on the Ada Lovelace architecture, using the AD107 chip manufactured on TSMC’s 5nm process. The GPU contains 18,900 million transistors on a 159 mm² die, with a transistor density of 118.9 million per mm². It features 3072 shading units, 96 texture mapping units, and 48 raster operation pipelines.

The memory subsystem consists of 8 GB of GDDR6 on a 128-bit bus, providing 256.0 GB/s of bandwidth. This is identical to the CPU’s memory bandwidth, but the GPU’s dedicated memory ensures no contention. The clocks run at 1545 MHz base and 1890 MHz boost, with memory at 2000 MHz (16 Gbps effective). The GPU includes 24 RT cores and 96 tensor cores, enabling hardware-accelerated ray tracing and DLSS. The FP32 performance is 11.61 TFLOPS, with FP16 at the same rate (1:1).

The GPU’s benchmark results show it ranks in the 67th percentile of all GPUs, with an average score of 22729. Its nearest rivals include the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 (0.7% faster), Intel Arc B580 (1.3% faster), and AMD Radeon RX 7700 XT (0.8% slower). The Geekbench OpenCL score of 89420 and Vulkan score of 89569 are solid, while the Passmark G3D score of 17469 confirms mid-range desktop-class performance.

The 115-watt TDP is typical for a mobile GPU in this class. The DirectX 12 Ultimate support and Vulkan 1.4 compatibility ensure access to modern graphics features. The 90.72 GPixel/s pixel rate and 181.4 GTexel/s texture rate are adequate for 1080p gaming but become limiting at higher resolutions, as evidenced by the measured FPS data showing significant drops at 1440p and 2160p.

Benchmark Performance

The combined benchmark picture shows a system with a powerful CPU and a mid-range GPU. The CPU’s average score of 77740 places it in the 95th percentile, while the GPU’s average score of 22729 places it in the 67th percentile. The combined percentile for the pairing is 81st, reflecting the CPU’s dominance in the overall score.

Key CPU benchmarks include Cinebench R23 multicore at 35314, Geekbench multicore at 20992, and Passmark multithread at 54934. The single-thread scores are 2044 (Cinebench R23) and 2464 (Geekbench). The GPU’s Passmark G3D score is 17469, with Geekbench OpenCL at 89420 and Vulkan at 89569. The GPU compute score is 6816, indicating moderate compute capability.

The pair rank is 2220 out of 3861 pairs based on average FPS across games, with an average of 113.8 FPS. This ranking places the configuration in the upper-middle tier of laptop gaming performance. The CPU’s performance relative to rivals shows it trading blows with desktop processors like the Intel Core i9-14900K (1.7% faster) and AMD Ryzen Threadripper PRO 9945WX (1.6% faster), while the GPU sits close to the RTX 2080 (0.7% faster) and RX 7700 XT (0.8% faster).

The combined picture reveals a system that excels in CPU-bound workloads and esports gaming but falls short in GPU-intensive AAA titles at high resolutions. The 81st combined percentile reflects this duality, offering strong overall capability with a clear performance ceiling dictated by the GPU.

FAQ

Q: What is the average FPS across all tested games?

A: The average FPS across 36 tested games is 113.8 frames per second at ultra settings.

Q: How does the CPU compare to the Intel Core i9-14900K?

A: The AMD Ryzen AI Max+ 395 has an average benchmark score of 77740, which is 1.7% lower than the Intel Core i9-14900K’s score of 79097.

Q: What memory type and bandwidth does this platform support?

A: The CPU supports LPDDR5X memory on a quad-channel bus, providing 256.0 GB/s of memory bandwidth.

Q: What is the GPU’s VRAM capacity and type?

A: The NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Mobile has 8 GB of GDDR6 memory on a 128-bit bus.

Q: How does the GPU compare to the AMD Radeon RX 7700 XT?

A: The RTX 4060 Mobile has an average score of 22729, which is 0.8% lower than the RX 7700 XT’s score of 22549.

Q: What is the CPU’s socket type?

A: The AMD Ryzen AI Max+ 395 uses AMD Socket FP11, which is designed for mobile platforms.

Q: What is the CPU’s performance percentile among all CPUs?

A: The CPU ranks in the 95th percentile of all CPUs, with an average benchmark score of 77740.

Balance and Bottleneck

The performance data clearly indicates that the GPU is the primary bottleneck in this pairing for gaming workloads. The CPU’s 95th percentile ranking versus the GPU’s 67th percentile creates a significant imbalance. In CPU-bound games like Valorant (376 FPS at 1080p) and CS:GO (362 FPS), the system performs exceptionally well, suggesting the GPU can keep up with the CPU’s frame generation in lighter titles.

However, in GPU-bound games, the limitation becomes apparent. Red Dead Redemption 2 drops to 44 FPS at 1080p and 22 FPS at 2160p, while Ark: Survival Ascended falls to 24 FPS at 1080p and 8 FPS at 2160p. The scaling from 1080p to 1440p typically shows a 30-40% FPS reduction, and from 1440p to 2160p another 40-50% reduction, which is characteristic of a GPU-limited scenario.

For productivity workloads, the CPU is the dominant component. The Cinebench R23 multicore score of 35314 and Passmark multithread score of 54934 indicate that the CPU can handle demanding parallel tasks without issue. The GPU’s compute score of 6816 is modest, so GPU-accelerated workloads like rendering or machine learning will be constrained by the GPU.

The memory configuration provides a balanced foundation, with both CPU and GPU having 256.0 GB/s of bandwidth. This means neither component is starved for memory throughput. The bottleneck analysis shows that for gaming, the RTX 4060 Mobile is the limiting factor, while for compute-heavy tasks, the CPU is the star performer. Users should expect to lower graphics settings or resolution for modern AAA games to achieve playable framerates.

Build Overview

This configuration pairs the AMD Ryzen AI Max+ 395, a 16-core Zen 5 mobile processor, with the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Mobile, an Ada Lovelace-based laptop GPU. The build class is laptop, meaning all components are integrated into a portable chassis with the GPU connected via PCIe 4.0 x8.

The overall tier of this system is above average, with a combined percentile of 81st. This places it in the upper echelon of laptop configurations, though not at the very top. The CPU is a flagship mobile processor that competes with desktop parts, while the GPU is a mid-range mobile offering that provides solid 1080p gaming and moderate 1440p capability.

The system’s strengths lie in CPU-intensive workloads: software development, video editing, 3D rendering, and competitive gaming at 1080p. Its weaknesses are in GPU-intensive AAA gaming at high resolutions, where the RTX 4060 Mobile’s 8 GB VRAM and 256.0 GB/s bandwidth become limiting. The average FPS of 113.8 across all tested games positions it as a capable gaming laptop, but the wide variance between esports titles (over 300 FPS) and demanding AAA titles (under 30 FPS at 4K) means users must tailor their expectations based on the game.

This is not a balanced build in the traditional sense; it is a CPU-first configuration with a capable but secondary GPU. For users who prioritize processing power and play less demanding games, this is an excellent choice. For those who want maximum gaming performance, the GPU will be the main source of frustration. The 81st combined percentile reflects this compromise, offering high-end productivity performance with mid-range gaming capability.