SYSTEM ANALYZER

Rate My PC: AMD Ryzen AI Max+ 395 + AMD Radeon 890M

Get a comprehensive performance analysis of your gaming rig with detailed benchmarks, bottleneck detection, and upgrade recommendations

Build Configuration

Select your components

PROCESSOR (CPU)

▼

GRAPHICS CARD (GPU)

▼

92 Score

Top 8% Ranking

92 / 100

ULTIMATE READY

Apex Performer

Top 8% of systems. Capable of 4K Ultra gaming and advanced rendering.

4K 60+ FPSVR ReadyRay Tracing

System Balance Analysis

CPU vs GPU performance ratio

Well Balanced

CPU

97%

GPU

86%

PROCESSOR

AMD Ryzen AI Max+ 395

77,740 Benchmark Score

Top 3% Market Ranking

View Full Specs →

GRAPHICS CARD

AMD Radeon 890M

9,210 Benchmark Score

Top 14% Market Ranking

View Full Specs →

Market Position

How your build compares to others

Budget

0-30

Mid-Range

30-60

High-End

60-85

Enthusiast

85-100

Your Build

Game Performance Benchmarks

Real-world 4K FPS in popular titles

View All Games →

Performance Insights

Tips to maximize your system

Optimal Performance

Your system is in the top tier. You can run any modern game at maximum settings.

4K Gaming Ready

Consider a 4K 144Hz monitor to fully utilize your hardware capabilities.

Compatible Games See what you can play Compare CPUs Find upgrades Compare GPUs Find upgrades

Performance Tiers Explained

90-100

Ultimate

4K Ultra gaming, VR ready, ray tracing enabled, professional workloads

4K 60+ FPS VR Ready

70-89

High-End

1440p Ultra or 4K High settings, excellent for modern AAA titles

1440p Ultra 4K High

50-69

Mid-Range

1080p Ultra or 1440p Medium, great value for most gamers

1080p Ultra 1440p Med

30-49

Entry Level

1080p Medium settings, suitable for eSports and older titles

1080p Med eSports

0-29

Legacy

Basic gaming, older titles, consider upgrading for modern games

720p-1080p Low Older Games

The AMD Ryzen AI Max+ 395 paired with the AMD Radeon 890M is a high-performance laptop combination that prioritizes multi-core CPU throughput over graphics fidelity. The data shows a processor that ranks in the 95th percentile among all CPUs, delivering desktop-class compute performance in a mobile form factor, while the integrated GPU sits in the 45th percentile, a mismatch that defines the system's capabilities. This pairing is a compute-first platform where the CPU is the undisputed star, and the GPU is best suited for light to moderate gaming rather than high-end graphics workloads.

CPU Analysis

The AMD Ryzen AI Max+ 395 is a 16-core, 32-thread processor built on the Zen 5 architecture, codenamed Strix Halo, and fabricated on TSMC's 4 nm process. It features a base clock of 3.00 GHz and a boost clock of 5.10 GHz, with a TDP of 55 W. The cache hierarchy is substantial: 80 KB of L1 per core, 1 MB of L2 per core, and a large 64 MB shared L3 cache. This configuration explains its exceptional multi-threaded performance, as the processor achieves a Cinebench R23 multi-core score of 35314 and a Geekbench multi-core score of 20992.

In real-world workloads, the Cinebench R23 multi-core result places the Ryzen AI Max+ 395 in a class typically occupied by desktop HEDT parts. It is 1.6% ahead of the AMD Ryzen Threadripper PRO 9945WX and 1.6% ahead of the AMD EPYC Embedded 8224P, while being 1.7% behind the Intel Core i9-14900K. The single-core performance is equally strong, with a Geekbench single-core score of 2464 and a Cinebench R23 single-core score of 2044, indicating excellent responsiveness for everyday tasks and lightly-threaded applications.

The PassMark suite reinforces the CPU's versatility. It scores 200665 in integer math, 128682 in floating-point math, and 690650 in data compression, which are indicative of strong performance in encryption, scientific computing, and file archiving. The data encryption score of 35455 and extended instructions score of 56346 further highlight its capability in security-related and vectorized workloads. The average benchmark score of 77740 places it in the 95th percentile of all CPUs, confirming that this is a top-tier processor for any compute-intensive task, from software compilation to 3D rendering.

GPU Analysis

The AMD Radeon 890M is an integrated graphics processor based on the RDNA 3.5 architecture, with a chip codenamed Strix Point. It operates at a base clock of 400 MHz and a boost clock of 2900 MHz, with a TDP of 15 W. The GPU features 1024 shading units, 64 texture mapping units, and 32 raster operation pipelines, along with 16 ray tracing cores. Its memory is system-shared, meaning it relies on the main system RAM for both capacity and bandwidth, which is described as "System Dependent."

In terms of raw compute, the Radeon 890M delivers 5.939 TFLOPS of FP32 performance and a pixel rate of 92.80 GPixel/s. However, benchmark results show it is a modest performer relative to discrete graphics cards. Its PassMark G3D score is 8076, and it sits at the 45th percentile among all GPUs. The data shows it is 0.1% behind the AMD Radeon Vega 8, 0.7% behind the NVIDIA GeForce GTX 960, and 1% behind the NVIDIA GeForce GTX 850M. This indicates that while it supports DirectX 12 Ultimate and Vulkan 1.4, its actual rendering power is comparable to entry-level discrete GPUs from several generations ago.

For gaming, the GPU's 3DMark Steel Nomad DX12 score of 590 and Geekbench Vulkan score of 40808 suggest it can handle esports titles at 1080p with reasonable settings, but it will struggle with modern AAA games. The ray tracing hardware is present, but with only 16 RT cores and shared memory bandwidth, ray-traced workloads are likely to be limited. The GPU is best viewed as a capable integrated solution for productivity and light gaming, not a replacement for a dedicated graphics card in demanding scenarios.

Usage Scenarios

High-Refresh Gaming: The Radeon 890M can drive competitive esports titles at high frame rates. In Counter-Strike: Global Offensive, it achieves 169 FPS at 1920x1080, and in Valorant, it hits 175 FPS at the same resolution. Call of Duty: Warzone runs at 162 FPS at 1080p. However, at 2560x1440, these numbers drop to 116 FPS, 150 FPS, and 144 FPS respectively, and at 3840x2160, they fall to 69 FPS, 120 FPS, and 122 FPS. For 1080p high-refresh gaming, this is viable; for 1440p, it is borderline; for 4K, it is not.

Streaming: The CPU's 16 cores and 32 threads provide ample headroom for encoding and streaming while gaming. With a Cinebench R23 multi-core score of 35314, the processor can handle simultaneous game rendering and x264 encoding without significant frame drops. The Geekbench multi-core score of 20992 further supports this, as streaming workloads benefit from high multi-threaded throughput. The GPU's 890M, while not a dedicated encoder powerhouse, is sufficient for light streaming at 1080p.

Video Editing: The Ryzen AI Max+ 395 excels at video editing workloads. Its PassMark data compression score of 690650 and floating-point math score of 128682 indicate strong performance in codecs and effects processing. The 64 MB L3 cache and 256.0 GB/s memory bandwidth (quad-channel LPDDR5X) ensure fast data access for timeline scrubbing and rendering. This is a professional-grade processor for 4K video editing, though the integrated GPU will limit real-time effects preview.

3D Rendering: The CPU is a rendering powerhouse. A Cinebench R23 multi-core score of 35314 places it in the same league as desktop Threadripper parts, making it ideal for CPU-based rendering in Blender or V-Ray. It is 2% ahead of the AMD Ryzen 9 8945HX in average benchmark score, confirming its dominance in this area. The GPU, however, is not suited for GPU-accelerated rendering, as its 5.939 TFLOPS FP32 performance is a fraction of what dedicated cards offer.

Software Development: Compilation and code analysis are heavily multi-threaded, and the CPU's 32 threads shine here. The PassMark integer math score of 200665 and extended instructions score of 56346 suggest rapid build times and efficient handling of complex codebases. The single-core Geekbench score of 2464 ensures snappy IDE responsiveness. This is a developer's dream machine for large projects.

Student and Office Work: For everyday tasks, the CPU's single-core performance is excellent, and the integrated GPU handles office applications, web browsing, and video conferencing without issue. The PassMark G2D score of 979 for the GPU indicates solid 2D performance. The 55 W TDP means it can run in a laptop without excessive heat, making it a portable yet powerful workstation for academic or office settings.

Balance and Bottleneck

The performance asymmetry between the CPU and GPU is stark. The CPU's 95th percentile ranking versus the GPU's 45th percentile creates a clear bottleneck in graphics-intensive scenarios. In gaming, the GPU is the limiting factor, as evidenced by the FPS data. For example, in Cyberpunk 2077, the system manages only 23 FPS at 1920x1080, and in Red Dead Redemption 2, it drops to 21 FPS. These numbers are far below what the CPU could feed a more powerful GPU.

Conversely, in CPU-bound workloads like rendering or compilation, the GPU is irrelevant, and the system performs at the level of a high-end desktop. The average FPS across all measured games is 51.4, and the pair rank is 3526 out of 3732 pairs, placing it in the bottom 5% of gaming performance. This confirms that the GPU is the bottleneck for gaming, while the CPU is the bottleneck for nothing—it is the system's primary strength.

The memory bandwidth of 256.0 GB/s is a significant asset for the CPU, but it is shared with the GPU, which uses system memory as VRAM. This shared bandwidth can cause contention in gaming, where both the CPU and GPU demand data simultaneously. The result is that even in esports titles, frame rates at 1440p are roughly 30-40% lower than at 1080p, indicating a memory bandwidth limitation as well as a raw GPU compute limitation.

Who Should Build It

Gamers at 1080p: This build is for gamers who primarily play esports and older titles at 1080p. The data shows strong performance in Counter-Strike 2 (77 FPS), Valorant (175 FPS), and Tom Clancy's Rainbow Six Siege (91 FPS). These users should avoid modern AAA games, as Cyberpunk 2077 and Red Dead Redemption 2 run below 25 FPS.

Content Creators: Video editors and 3D artists who rely on CPU rendering will find this platform exceptional. The Cinebench R23 multi-core score of 35314 and Geekbench multi-core score of 20992 make it a portable alternative to desktop workstations. The GPU is adequate for preview but not for final renders.

Software Developers: The 16 cores and 32 threads, combined with 64 MB L3 cache, make this ideal for compiling large codebases and running virtual machines. The PassMark data encryption score of 35455 also benefits developers working on security applications.

Students and Office Workers: For general productivity, the system is overkill but excellent. The single-core Geekbench score of 2464 ensures fast application launches, and the 55 W TDP allows for a thin-and-light laptop form factor. It handles spreadsheets, documents, and web browsing with ease.

Small Business Workstations: The ECC memory support (true) makes this suitable for financial modeling or database work where data integrity is critical. The quad-channel memory bus and 256.0 GB/s bandwidth provide high throughput for analysis workloads.

FAQ

Q: What is the CPU's performance percentile?

A: The AMD Ryzen AI Max+ 395 is in the 95th percentile of all CPUs, with an average benchmark score of 77740.

Q: How does the integrated GPU compare to dedicated graphics cards?

A: The Radeon 890M is in the 45th percentile of all GPUs, and it is 0.7% behind the NVIDIA GeForce GTX 960 in average benchmark score.

Q: Can this system run modern AAA games?

A: No. At 1920x1080, Cyberpunk 2077 runs at 23 FPS and Red Dead Redemption 2 at 21 FPS, which is below playable levels.

Q: What is the memory configuration?

A: The CPU supports LPDDR5X memory in a quad-channel configuration, providing 256.0 GB/s of bandwidth, and it supports ECC memory.

Q: What is the CPU's TDP?

A: The Ryzen AI Max+ 395 has a TDP of 55 W, while the integrated Radeon 890M has a TDP of 15 W.

Q: What is the socket and platform?

A: The CPU uses AMD Socket FP11 and is part of the Strix Halo platform with Zen 5 architecture.

Q: What is the best resolution for gaming?

A: For esports titles, 1920x1080 yields the highest frame rates, such as 175 FPS in Valorant, while 2560x1440 drops to 150 FPS and 3840x2160 to 120 FPS.

Benchmark Performance

The combined benchmark picture shows a system with exceptional CPU power and modest GPU capability. The CPU's Cinebench R23 multi-core score of 35314 is a standout, placing it 1.6% ahead of the AMD Ryzen Threadripper PRO 9945WX and 2% ahead of the AMD Ryzen 9 8945HX. The Geekbench multi-core score of 20992 and PassMark multithread score of 54934 confirm its workstation-class performance.

The GPU's 3DMark Steel Nomad DX12 score of 590 and PassMark G3D score of 8076 are underwhelming, placing it in the 45th percentile. It is 0.1% behind the AMD Radeon Vega 8 and 0.7% behind the NVIDIA GeForce GTX 960. The average FPS across all tested games is 51.4, and the pair ranks 3526 out of 3732, meaning 94.5% of CPU+GPU combinations perform better in gaming.

The combined percentile for this build is 70, reflecting the high CPU score pulling up the overall average. This is a system that will excel in productivity and content creation benchmarks, but it will lag in gaming benchmarks. The data supports a verdict of a compute-first platform, not a gaming rig.

Upgrade Path and Platform

The AMD Ryzen AI Max+ 395 is built on the Zen 5 architecture with a 4 nm process, using the AMD Socket FP11. The memory support is LPDDR5X in a quad-channel configuration, with a bandwidth of 256.0 GB/s and ECC support. The PCIe interface is Gen 4 with 16 lanes (CPU only), which is sufficient for high-speed NVMe storage but may limit future discrete GPU upgrades.

The CPU's TDP is 55 W, which is low for a 16-core part, indicating it is designed for laptops where thermal headroom is limited. The integrated Radeon 890M has a TDP of 15 W, and there is no suggested PSU, as this is an integrated platform. The upgrade path is limited by the socket and laptop form factor; users cannot swap the CPU or GPU. A sensible next upgrade would be to add more system memory, as the GPU performance is system-dependent on available RAM and bandwidth. However, the platform is a dead end for graphics upgrades, as the only way to improve gaming performance would be to move to a different laptop with a discrete GPU.

The build class is "laptop," and the production status for both the CPU and GPU is "Active." The CPU was released on 2025-01-05, and the GPU on 2024-07-14. The lack of a launch MSRP for either component suggests this is a high-end, non-retail part, likely found in premium laptops.

Build Overview

This pairing of the AMD Ryzen AI Max+ 395 and AMD Radeon 890M is a laptop-class build that prioritizes CPU compute over GPU graphics. The CPU is a 16-core, 32-thread Zen 5 part with a 95th percentile ranking, making it one of the most powerful mobile processors available. The GPU is an integrated RDNA 3.5 part with a 45th percentile ranking, suitable for light gaming and productivity.

The combined percentile of 70 reflects the CPU's dominance, but the gaming performance is poor, with an average FPS of 51.4 across all titles. This is a system for professionals who need portable, high-end compute performance, not for gamers seeking high frame rates in modern titles. The data is clear: this is a workstation-class CPU with an entry-level GPU, and the overall tier is "high-end CPU, mid-range GPU" in a laptop form factor.

Rate My PC: AMD Ryzen AI Max+ 395 + AMD Radeon 890M

Apex Performer

System Balance Analysis

AMD Ryzen AI Max+ 395

AMD Radeon 890M

Market Position

Game Performance Benchmarks

Valorant

Counter-Strike: Global Offensive

Call of Duty: Warzone

Call of Duty: Warzone

Valorant

Counter-Strike: Global Offensive

Performance Insights

Optimal Performance

4K Gaming Ready

Performance Tiers Explained

Ultimate

High-End

Mid-Range

Entry Level

Legacy

CPU Analysis

GPU Analysis

Usage Scenarios

Balance and Bottleneck

Who Should Build It

FAQ

Benchmark Performance

Upgrade Path and Platform

Build Overview

4K Gaming Performance

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

1440p Gaming Performance

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

1080p Gaming Performance

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

Related Processors

Related Graphics Cards

Compare Your CPU

Compare Your GPU

Related PC Builds

Same CPU with Different GPUs

Same GPU with Different CPUs

Other Popular Builds