SYSTEM ANALYZER

Rate My PC: AMD Ryzen AI Max+ 395 + AMD Radeon 760M

Get a comprehensive performance analysis of your gaming rig with detailed benchmarks, bottleneck detection, and upgrade recommendations

Build Configuration

Select your components

PROCESSOR (CPU)

▼

GRAPHICS CARD (GPU)

▼

90 Score

Top 10% Ranking

90 / 100

ULTIMATE READY

Apex Performer

Top 10% of systems. Capable of 4K Ultra gaming and advanced rendering.

4K 60+ FPSVR ReadyRay Tracing

System Balance Analysis

CPU vs GPU performance ratio

Well Balanced

CPU

97%

GPU

83%

PROCESSOR

AMD Ryzen AI Max+ 395

77,740 Benchmark Score

Top 3% Market Ranking

View Full Specs →

GRAPHICS CARD

AMD Radeon 760M

6,019 Benchmark Score

Top 17% Market Ranking

View Full Specs →

Market Position

How your build compares to others

Budget

0-30

Mid-Range

30-60

High-End

60-85

Enthusiast

85-100

Your Build

Game Performance Benchmarks

Real-world 4K FPS in popular titles

View All Games →

Performance Insights

Tips to maximize your system

Optimal Performance

Your system is in the top tier. You can run any modern game at maximum settings.

4K Gaming Ready

Consider a 4K 144Hz monitor to fully utilize your hardware capabilities.

Compatible Games See what you can play Compare CPUs Find upgrades Compare GPUs Find upgrades

Performance Tiers Explained

90-100

Ultimate

4K Ultra gaming, VR ready, ray tracing enabled, professional workloads

4K 60+ FPS VR Ready

70-89

High-End

1440p Ultra or 4K High settings, excellent for modern AAA titles

1440p Ultra 4K High

50-69

Mid-Range

1080p Ultra or 1440p Medium, great value for most gamers

1080p Ultra 1440p Med

30-49

Entry Level

1080p Medium settings, suitable for eSports and older titles

1080p Med eSports

0-29

Legacy

Basic gaming, older titles, consider upgrading for modern games

720p-1080p Low Older Games

The AMD Ryzen AI Max+ 395 paired with the AMD Radeon 760M is a study in contrast, combining a top-tier 16-core processor with an entry-level integrated GPU. The data reveals a machine built for heavy compute tasks that will struggle with modern gaming, making it a niche product for specific professional workflows rather than a general-purpose consumer laptop.

Upgrade Path and Platform

The platform is built around the AMD Socket FP11, which is a mobile-focused socket, indicating that upgrades are limited to the system in which this processor resides. The architecture is Zen 5, codenamed Strix Halo, built on a 4 nm process from TSMC, with a die size of 2x 70.6 mm². Memory support is LPDDR5X, running on a quad-channel bus that delivers a substantial 256.0 GB/s of bandwidth, a figure that is crucial for the system's integrated graphics. The processor supports ECC memory, which is a key feature for workstation-class tasks where data integrity is paramount. The platform uses PCIe Gen 4 with 16 lanes available from the CPU, providing a reasonable foundation for fast NVMe storage and discrete GPUs, should the laptop design allow for them.

The CPU has a TDP of 55 W, which is a moderate figure for a 16-core processor, suggesting a focus on efficiency within the mobile thermal envelope. The integrated GPU is rated at a 15 W TDP, meaning the total package is manageable within a high-end laptop chassis. A sensible next upgrade path for this platform would not involve the CPU or GPU, as they are soldered, but rather focus on memory capacity and storage. Given the shared memory architecture for the GPU, a maximum LPDDR5X configuration would be crucial to maximize both CPU and GPU performance. The 64 MB of shared L3 cache helps mitigate the lack of a discrete GPU by providing a large pool of fast memory for the CPU to feed data to the integrated graphics.

GPU Analysis

The AMD Radeon 760M is an integrated GPU based on the RDNA 3.0 architecture, built on the same 4 nm node as the CPU. It has 512 shading units, 32 texture mapping units, and 16 raster output pipelines. The chip includes 8 ray tracing cores, though it has no dedicated tensor cores. The boost clock is 2599 MHz, with a base clock of 800 MHz. The GPU operates with system-shared memory, meaning its bandwidth is system dependent, which is a critical bottleneck for graphics performance. Its raw compute performance is 5.323 TFLOPS for both FP32 and FP16, which is a modest figure for modern rendering tasks.

Benchmark results place this GPU at the 35th percentile of all GPUs, indicating it is in the lower half of the performance spectrum. Its average benchmark score is 6019, which is nearly identical to the AMD Radeon RX 6400, scoring 6001 with a delta of 0.3%. The data suggests the integrated GPU is capable of light gaming and desktop acceleration, but it is not designed for heavy 3D rendering. In 3DMark Steel Nomad, a DX12 test, it scores 400, which is a very low result that reflects its limitations in modern games. The Geekbench OpenCL score of 20255 and Vulkan score of 30336 provide a more complete picture, but these are still not high enough for serious creative workloads. The DirectX 10 and 11 scores of 19 and 52, respectively, show its performance drops in older APIs, while the DirectX 9 score of 65 is relatively higher, but still low overall.

Usage Scenarios

High-Refresh Gaming: The GPU is not suited for high-refresh gaming at high settings. In esports titles like Counter-Strike: Global Offensive, it manages 117 FPS at 1080p, but at 1440p, this drops to 80 FPS. In Valorant, it achieves 121 FPS at 1080p, but the frame rate falls to 103 at 1440p. These results show it can handle competitive games, but only at lower resolutions and settings, and not with high refresh rates on modern AAA titles.

Streaming: The CPU is a powerhouse, with a Cinebench R23 multi-core score of 35314, which is more than enough to handle the encoding workload for streaming. The 16 cores and 32 threads will easily manage game capture and encoding simultaneously. However, the GPU's low performance will be a bottleneck for the game itself, limiting the stream's visual quality. The GPU’s 8 RT cores can handle some basic effects, but its overall rendering power is too low for high-quality streaming of modern titles.

Video Editing: This is a mixed scenario. The CPU’s performance is stellar for rendering and export tasks, with a Passmark multi-thread score of 54934 and a Geekbench multi-core score of 20992. The high memory bandwidth of 256.0 GB/s will help with large files and previews. However, the GPU’s low compute capability will slow down effects, transitions, and the real-time preview of a timeline. The system is best suited for CPU-heavy cuts and rendering, but will be slow for GPU-accelerated effects.

3D Rendering: The CPU will be the star here. The Cinebench R23 multi-core score of 35314 is excellent for a mobile processor, and the Passmark floating-point math score of 128682 indicates strong performance in scientific and render calculations. However, the GPU's 5.323 TFLOPS of FP32 power is a major limiting factor for any GPU-based renderer. The data shows a strong CPU and a weak GPU, making this a poor choice for real-time or GPU-accelerated 3D rendering.

Software Development: The CPU’s performance is a boon for compilation and development tasks. The high single-thread score of 2464 in Geekbench and the Passmark single-thread score of 4147 indicate snappy performance in code editors and IDE tools. The multi-core scores will drastically reduce compilation times. The ECC memory support is a bonus for long-running processes and data integrity, making this an ideal build for a developer who needs a powerful and stable CPU.

Student and Office Work: The system is overkill for this scenario. The CPU will handle any office application with ease, and the GPU is capable of basic 2D graphics and video playback. The Passmark G2D score of 890 is low, but is sufficient for standard office tasks. The high power consumption and large size of such a laptop are unnecessary for a student. The performance is more than required, but the cost and battery life would be a concern.

Balance and Bottleneck

The system is severely unbalanced, with the CPU being a top-tier performer and the GPU being an entry-level part. The CPU’s average benchmark score is 77740, placing it at the 95th percentile of all CPUs, while the GPU’s average score of 6019 places it at the 35th percentile. The CPU is 1.6% ahead of the AMD Ryzen Threadripper PRO 9945WX and 1.7% behind the Intel Core i9-14900K. This is a massive gap in relative performance. The GPU is the primary bottleneck in any gaming workload, as its 3DMark Steel Nomad score of 400 shows a very low rendering capability.

The measured FPS data confirms this. In games like Cyberpunk 2077, the frame rate is 16 FPS at 1080p, and in Red Dead Redemption 2, it is 14 FPS. These are unplayable numbers, and they are a direct result of the GPU’s limitations. The CPU is not the limiting factor in these games; the GPU is. In contrast, for tasks like video encoding or software compilation, the CPU is the star, and the GPU is not a factor. The CPU’s high memory bandwidth is a positive, but it cannot compensate for the GPU’s low compute power. The pair rank by FPS is 3726 out of 3732 pairs, with an average FPS of 36.5, confirming the GPU is the weakest link.

Who Should Build It

This is a niche product for users who need a workstation-class CPU in a laptop without a dedicated GPU. The primary users are developers who need to compile large codebases, data scientists who need to run CPU-intensive simulations, and researchers who need the raw processing power of a 16-core processor. The CPU’s ECC memory support makes it suitable for a small business workstation where data reliability is critical. Gamers are not the target audience, as the GPU’s performance is too low for a good experience in modern titles. A content creator who works primarily with CPU-based rendering, such as audio processing or some types of video encoding, might find this useful. However, for anyone who needs a laptop for gaming or GPU-accelerated workloads, this is not the right choice.

Gaming Performance

The measured FPS data shows that this is not a gaming laptop. At 1080p ultra settings, the average FPS across games is 36.5. The frame rates are highly variable, ranging from 162 FPS in Call of Duty: Warzone to 8 FPS in Ark: Survival Ascended. In 2D or less demanding titles, it can be playable. For example, Roblox runs at 68 FPS at 1080p, and Counter-Strike: Global Offensive at 117 FPS. However, modern AAA titles are unplayable, with 16 FPS in Cyberpunk 2077 and 14 FPS in Red Dead Redemption 2. At 1440p, these numbers drop further, with Call of Duty: Warzone at 144 FPS and Cyberpunk 2077 at 12 FPS. At 4K, the performance is unusable, with most titles falling below 20 FPS. The data indicates that the system is only suitable for esports at 1080p, and even then, only for older or less demanding games.

Benchmark Performance

The CPU is a monster. Its Cinebench R23 multi-core score is 35314, and the single-core score is 2044. The Geekbench multi-core score is 20992, and the single-core score is 2464. The Passmark multi-thread score is 54934, and the single-thread score is 4147. The CPU’s average benchmark score is 77740, placing it at the 95th percentile. It is 1.6% ahead of the AMD Ryzen Threadripper PRO 9945WX and 1.6% ahead of the AMD EPYC Embedded 8224P, while being 1.7% behind the Intel Core i9-14900K.

The GPU’s performance is in stark contrast. Its average benchmark score is 6019, placing it at the 35th percentile. Its 3DMark Steel Nomad score is 400, which is very low. The Passmark G3D score is 5310, and the GPU compute score is 2840. The GPU’s nearest rival is the AMD Radeon RX 6400, which is 0.3% faster. The combined percentile for the system is 65, but this is misleading because the CPU is so strong. The data shows a system that is excellent for CPU work and poor for GPU work, and the combined score is an average that hides the imbalance.

FAQ

Q: What is the CPU's core and thread count?

A: The AMD Ryzen AI Max+ 395 has 16 cores and 32 threads, based on the Zen 5 architecture.

Q: What is the GPU's memory configuration?

A: The AMD Radeon 760M uses system-shared memory, meaning its size, type, and bandwidth are all dependent on the system's main memory.

Q: How does the CPU compare to the Intel Core i9-14900K?

A: The Ryzen AI Max+ 395 has an average benchmark score of 77740, which is 1.7% behind the Intel Core i9-14900K.

Q: What is the CPU's TDP?

A: The CPU has a TDP of 55 W, while the GPU has a TDP of 15 W.

Q: What is the CPU's memory bandwidth?

A: The CPU supports quad-channel LPDDR5X memory with a bandwidth of 256.0 GB/s.

Q: Can this system run Cyberpunk 2077 at 1080p?

A: Yes, but at a low frame rate. The measured FPS for Cyberpunk 2077 at 1080p is 16 FPS.

Q: What is the CPU's socket type?

A: The CPU uses the AMD Socket FP11.

CPU Analysis

The AMD Ryzen AI Max+ 395 is a high-end mobile processor with 16 cores and 32 threads, built on the Zen 5 architecture. It has a base clock of 3.00 GHz and a boost clock of 5.10 GHz. The CPU is built on a 4 nm process at TSMC, with a die size of 2x 70 mm². It has 80 KB of L1 cache per core, 1 MB of L2 cache per core, and a large 64 MB of shared L3 cache. The CPU supports ECC memory, which is a key feature for data integrity in a professional setting. The TDP is 55 W, which is a moderate figure for a processor of this caliber.

The benchmark data shows the CPU is a powerhouse. The Cinebench R23 multi-core score of 35314 is a top-tier result, indicating that it can handle heavy multi-threaded workloads like video rendering, software compilation, and complex scientific simulations. The single-core score of 2044 is also strong, ensuring a snappy feel in everyday tasks and gaming. The Geekbench multi-core score of 20992 and single-core score of 2464 confirm this. The Passmark multi-thread score of 54934 is exceptional, and the floating-point math score of 128682 indicates a very strong performance in mathematical and scientific computations. The data encryption score of 35455 is also high, showing that the CPU is well-suited for security-related workloads. The 95th percentile rank against all CPUs underscores its position as a top-tier processor. The high memory bandwidth of 256 GB/s is a major advantage for the CPU, especially in data-intensive tasks and for feeding the integrated GPU.

Rate My PC: AMD Ryzen AI Max+ 395 + AMD Radeon 760M

Apex Performer

System Balance Analysis

AMD Ryzen AI Max+ 395

AMD Radeon 760M

Market Position

Game Performance Benchmarks

Call of Duty: Warzone

Call of Duty: Warzone

Valorant

Call of Duty: Warzone

Call of Duty: Warzone

Counter-Strike: Global Offensive

Performance Insights

Optimal Performance

4K Gaming Ready

Performance Tiers Explained

Ultimate

High-End

Mid-Range

Entry Level

Legacy

Upgrade Path and Platform

GPU Analysis

Usage Scenarios

Balance and Bottleneck

Who Should Build It

Gaming Performance

Benchmark Performance

FAQ

CPU Analysis

4K Gaming Performance

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

1440p Gaming Performance

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

1080p Gaming Performance

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

Related Processors

Related Graphics Cards

Compare Your CPU

Compare Your GPU

Related PC Builds

Same CPU with Different GPUs

Same GPU with Different CPUs

Other Popular Builds