SYSTEM ANALYZER

Rate My PC: AMD Ryzen AI Max+ 392 + NVIDIA RTX 5000 Mobile Ada Generation

Get a comprehensive performance analysis of your gaming rig with detailed benchmarks, bottleneck detection, and upgrade recommendations

Build Configuration

Select your components

PROCESSOR (CPU)

▼

GRAPHICS CARD (GPU)

▼

89 Score

Top 11% Ranking

89 / 100

HIGH-END

Power Build

Top 11% of systems. Excellent for 1440p Ultra or 4K High gaming.

1440p Ultra4K High

System Balance Analysis

CPU vs GPU performance ratio

Well Balanced

CPU

98%

GPU

80%

PROCESSOR

AMD Ryzen AI Max+ 392

90,541 Benchmark Score

Top 2% Market Ranking

View Full Specs →

GRAPHICS CARD

NVIDIA RTX 5000 Mobile Ada Generation

3,596 Benchmark Score

Top 20% Market Ranking

View Full Specs →

Market Position

How your build compares to others

Budget

0-30

Mid-Range

30-60

High-End

60-85

Enthusiast

85-100

Your Build

Game Performance Benchmarks

Real-world 4K FPS in popular titles

View All Games →

Performance Insights

Tips to maximize your system

Strong Performance

Excellent for 1440p gaming. Most games will run at high/ultra settings smoothly.

Compatible Games See what you can play Compare CPUs Find upgrades Compare GPUs Find upgrades

Performance Tiers Explained

90-100

Ultimate

4K Ultra gaming, VR ready, ray tracing enabled, professional workloads

4K 60+ FPS VR Ready

70-89

High-End

1440p Ultra or 4K High settings, excellent for modern AAA titles

1440p Ultra 4K High

50-69

Mid-Range

1080p Ultra or 1440p Medium, great value for most gamers

1080p Ultra 1440p Med

30-49

Entry Level

1080p Medium settings, suitable for eSports and older titles

1080p Med eSports

0-29

Legacy

Basic gaming, older titles, consider upgrading for modern games

720p-1080p Low Older Games

The AMD Ryzen AI Max+ 392 and NVIDIA RTX 5000 Mobile Ada Generation pairing represents a high-end mobile computing platform, with the CPU placing in the 96th percentile against all tested processors and the combined system reaching the 59th percentile overall. The data set contains no measured frame rates for this specific combination, meaning all gaming performance figures discussed here are estimates derived solely from the benchmark scores of the individual components, not from direct testing of this pairing.

GPU Analysis — VRAM, bandwidth, clocks, RT/tensor hardware, what the benchmark scores mean for rendering

The NVIDIA RTX 5000 Mobile Ada Generation GPU is built on the Ada Lovelace architecture using TSMC's 5 nm process, with the AD103 chip containing 45,900 million transistors on a 379 mm² die. The GPU operates with a base clock of 1425 MHz and a boost clock of 2115 MHz, paired with 16 GB of GDDR6 memory on a 256-bit bus, delivering a memory bandwidth of 576.0 GB/s. The memory clock runs at 2250 MHz with an effective data rate of 18 Gbps, which is substantial for a mobile part and supports high-resolution textures and large datasets in creative workloads.

The GPU's compute configuration includes 9728 shading units, 304 texture mapping units, and 112 raster operation pipelines. For ray tracing and AI acceleration, the chip houses 76 RT cores and 304 tensor cores, providing dedicated hardware for real-time ray-traced lighting and DLSS-style upscaling. The raw compute throughput is rated at 41.15 TFLOPS for both FP32 and FP16 operations, indicating the GPU can handle single-precision and half-precision workloads at identical rates, which is beneficial for machine learning inference and certain rendering pipelines that leverage FP16.

The pixel rate is 236.9 GPixel/s and the texture rate is 643.0 GTexel/s, meaning the GPU can fill frames and apply textures at high speeds, which matters for 1440p and 4K rendering where fill-rate demands are significant. The GPU supports DirectX 12 Ultimate (12_2), OpenGL 4.6, and Vulkan 1.4, covering modern graphics APIs fully. In the 3DMark Steel Nomad DX12 benchmark, the GPU scores 3596, which places it in the 21st percentile of all GPUs. This score is nearly identical to the NVIDIA GeForce GT 545 (3594, 0.1% delta), the NVIDIA GeForce GT 735M (3616, -0.6% delta), the NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 (3629, -0.9% delta), and the AMD Radeon HD 6770 (3649, -1.5% delta). These rivals are all older or lower-tier parts, suggesting that while the RTX 5000 Mobile Ada Generation has modern features and ample VRAM, its raw rasterization performance in this specific test is not class-leading; the 21st percentile position indicates it trails a large majority of GPUs in the database.

For rendering workloads, the 16 GB VRAM and 576.0 GB/s bandwidth are the standout features, allowing large scenes and high-resolution textures to reside on the GPU without spilling to system memory. The 76 RT cores accelerate ray-traced effects, and the 41.15 TFLOPS FP16 throughput supports fast half-precision compute, which is leveraged in some renderers and AI denoisers. The benchmark score, however, suggests that the GPU's raw rasterization may be a limiting factor for very demanding real-time workloads at high settings, despite its modern architecture and generous memory pool.

Usage Scenarios — grounded in the scores: high-refresh gaming, streaming, video editing, 3D rendering, software development, student and office work. One short paragraph per scenario, citing the numbers that support the verdict

For high-refresh gaming, the GPU's 21st percentile ranking and 3596 Steel Nomad score indicate the RTX 5000 Mobile Ada Generation is not positioned for top-tier frame rates at high settings. The 16 GB VRAM and 576.0 GB/s bandwidth are sufficient for modern game assets, but the raw compute of 41.15 TFLOPS may limit performance at 1440p or 4K with ultra settings, so competitive frame rates would more realistically be achieved at lower resolutions or with reduced graphical presets.

Streaming workloads benefit from the GPU's tensor cores and Ada Lovelace architecture, which support hardware-accelerated encoding and AI features. The 304 tensor cores can handle real-time upscaling and encoding tasks, and the 16 GB VRAM provides headroom for multiple simultaneous streams or high-bitrate recording, though the overall GPU performance percentile suggests the system should be paired with a strong CPU to handle the encoding load without dropping frames.

Video editing in applications that leverage GPU acceleration will use the RTX 5000 Mobile Ada Generation's 16 GB VRAM for timeline previews and effect rendering. The 576.0 GB/s memory bandwidth allows smooth scrubbing of high-resolution footage, and the 304 tensor cores can accelerate AI-based tools like denoising and upscaling. However, the 21st percentile GPU score means export times and real-time effects might be slower than higher-ranked GPUs, so the workflow would rely on the CPU's multithreaded performance for heavy lifting.

3D rendering and ray tracing are where the GPU's 76 RT cores and 41.15 TFLOPS FP16 throughput come into play. The RT cores accelerate path tracing in compatible renderers, and the 16 GB VRAM handles complex scenes, but the benchmark score of 3596 indicates that interactive viewport performance may not match dedicated desktop workstation GPUs, making this a capable but not extreme rendering solution that would still need the CPU for simulation and pre-processing.

Software development workloads, including compiling large codebases and running virtual machines, rely heavily on the CPU. The Ryzen AI Max+ 392's multithread score of 45231 and integer math score of 152414 indicate strong parallel processing capability, which shortens build times; the 64 MB L3 cache helps with frequently accessed data, and the 256.0 GB/s memory bandwidth supports memory-intensive development tasks like running multiple containers or managing large databases.

Student and office work is a light load for this hardware, with the single-thread score of 3927 handling everyday applications responsively and the integrated Radeon 8060S providing a backup display option if the discrete GPU is not needed. The 55 W TDP CPU and 120 W GPU mean the laptop will require adequate cooling, but for document editing, web browsing, and spreadsheets, the system is massively overprovisioned, and the 96th percentile CPU ranking ensures no lag in typical office tasks.

Upgrade Path and Platform — socket, memory support, PCIe, PSU headroom from suggestedPsu/tdp, what a sensible next upgrade looks like

The platform is built around the AMD Ryzen AI Max+ 392, which uses the AMD Socket FP11 and the Zen 5 architecture with the Strix Halo codename. This is a mobile platform, classified as a laptop build, so the upgrade path is limited compared to desktop systems. The CPU supports LPDDR5X memory in a quad-channel configuration, delivering a memory bandwidth of 256.0 GB/s, and it includes ECC memory support, which is a feature typically found in workstation-class components. The CPU provides 16 PCIe Gen 4 lanes (CPU only), which is used for the GPU and other high-speed devices, but there is no mention of expansion slots or upgradeable components in the data.

The GPU connects via PCIe 4.0 x16, and the bus interface is standard for a mobile discrete graphics solution. The GPU's TDP is 120 W, and the CPU's TDP is 55 W, meaning the combined thermal load is roughly 175 W, but no suggested PSU is provided in the data, and the power connectors are listed as "None" because this is an integrated mobile part, not a standalone card. The power delivery is handled by the laptop's internal design, so users cannot upgrade the PSU; instead, the entire system is the upgrade path.

A sensible next upgrade for this platform would be increasing system memory, since LPDDR5X is soldered or integrated on the board, but the quad-channel configuration and 256.0 GB/s bandwidth are already strong, so the benefit would be in capacity, not speed. The Radeon 8060S integrated graphics provide a fallback if the discrete GPU fails or for power-saving modes, and the CPU's 96th percentile ranking means it is unlikely to be the bottleneck in the near term. Since the GPU is in the 21st percentile, the most impactful upgrade would be to a laptop with a higher-performing discrete GPU, but that would require a new system, as the mobile form factor does not allow swapping the GPU. The platform is otherwise current, with PCIe Gen 4 support and active production status for both components, so software updates and driver optimizations are the only practical "upgrades" for the existing hardware.

Balance and Bottleneck — which component limits which workload, using percentiles and FPS scaling as evidence

The data shows a clear imbalance between the CPU and GPU, with the Ryzen AI Max+ 392 ranking in the 96th percentile of all CPUs and the RTX 5000 Mobile Ada Generation ranking in the 21st percentile of all GPUs. This 75-percentile gap indicates that in most workloads, the GPU will be the limiting factor, as the CPU has far more headroom relative to its peers than the GPU does. For gaming, this means the frame rate will be constrained by the GPU's rasterization performance, not the CPU's ability to feed it, since the CPU's multithread score of 45231 and single-thread score of 3927 are both high enough to handle game logic and draw calls at high frame rates.

In CPU-bound workloads like software compilation, encryption, or physics simulation, the CPU will be the active component, and the GPU will sit mostly idle. The CPU's passmark_data_encryption score of 27784 and passmark_physics score of 2887 indicate strong single-thread and multithread performance, so the bottleneck shifts entirely to the GPU only when the workload is graphics-intensive. For 3D rendering, the balance depends on the renderer: if it uses the GPU (e.g., ray tracing), the GPU's 21st percentile ranking will limit speed, but if it uses the CPU (e.g., traditional rasterization), the CPU's 96th percentile ranking will dominate.

The FPS scaling evidence is indirect, as no measured FPS exists for this pairing, but the combined percentile of 59 for the system suggests that the overall experience is average, pulled down by the GPU's low ranking. In gaming at 1080p, the CPU could push high frame rates, but the GPU would cap them at a level consistent with its 3596 Steel Nomad score, which rivals like the GTX 1050 achieve, indicating 1080p medium-to-high settings is the realistic ceiling. At 1440p or 4K, the GPU becomes even more of a bottleneck, as the resolution scaling increases GPU load while the CPU's advantage becomes less relevant. For content creation, the CPU's 99548 floating-point math score and 152414 integer math score handle most compute, but GPU-accelerated effects will be limited by the GPU's 41.15 TFLOPS, which is moderate compared to top-tier parts.

Benchmark Performance — exact CPU and GPU scores, percentile positions, and what the combined picture is

The CPU benchmarks for the AMD Ryzen AI Max+ 392 show a strong all-round performer. The multithread score is 45231, the single-thread score is 3927, and the average benchmark score is 90541, placing the CPU in the 96th percentile of all CPUs. Its nearest rivals are the Intel Xeon 654 (avg score 90717, delta -0.2%), the AMD Ryzen 9 9955HX (avg score 91199, delta -0.7%), the Intel Xeon w7-2575X (avg score 88172, delta 2.7%), and the Intel Xeon 6736P (avg score 87864, delta 3%). This means the Ryzen AI Max+ 392 is statistically tied with the top Xeon and Ryzen parts, being less than 1% behind the fastest rivals and 2.7% to 3% ahead of the slower Xeon models, confirming its position as a high-end mobile CPU.

The GPU benchmarks are sparse, with only one test: the 3DMark Steel Nomad DX12 score of 3596. This puts the GPU in the 21st percentile of all GPUs, and its nearest rivals are the NVIDIA GeForce GT 545 (3594, 0.1% delta), the NVIDIA GeForce GT 735M (3616, -0.6% delta), the NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 (3629, -0.9% delta), and the AMD Radeon HD 6770 (3649, -1.5% delta). The GPU is effectively tied with these much older parts, with deltas within 1.5%, which is a striking result for a modern Ada Lovelace chip with 16 GB VRAM and 41.15 TFLOPS. The 21st percentile ranking means the GPU performs below the vast majority of GPUs in the database for this specific test, suggesting that the RTX 5000 Mobile Ada Generation may be thermally or power-limited in this mobile form factor, or that the Steel Nomad test favors other architectures.

The combined picture is a system with a top-tier CPU and a below-average GPU. The combined percentile is 59, which is a middling overall score, dragged down by the GPU's low ranking. For users who prioritize CPU-intensive tasks like code compilation, data encryption, or physics simulation, this system is excellent, as the CPU's 96th percentile ranking ensures it outperforms nearly all rivals. For users who prioritize GPU-intensive tasks like gaming or GPU rendering, the system will underperform relative to its price point, as the GPU's 21st percentile ranking means it is outclassed by many cheaper or older parts. The data suggests this is a CPU-first workstation that happens to have a discrete GPU, not a balanced gaming or rendering machine.

Who Should Build It — target users and industries (gamers at specific resolutions, content creators, developers, students, small business workstations) tied strictly to the measured performance

Gamers targeting 1080p with medium-to-high settings are the most suitable audience, as the GPU's performance, tied to the GTX 1050 in the Steel Nomad test, indicates it can handle esports titles and older AAA games at playable frame rates. Gamers expecting 1440p or 4K ultra settings would be disappointed, as the 21st percentile GPU ranking will not deliver smooth frame rates at those resolutions with high graphical demands.

Content creators working in CPU-heavy tasks like video encoding (the CPU's data encryption score is 27784), 3D modeling, or software development will find the system well-suited, as the 12-core, 24-thread CPU with a 64 MB L3 cache and 256.0 GB/s memory bandwidth handles multi-threaded workloads efficiently. GPU-accelerated effects in video editors or renderers will be slower, but the 16 GB VRAM allows large project files to be loaded without memory errors.

Software developers and data scientists will benefit from the CPU's 96th percentile ranking, particularly for compiling large codebases (integer math score of 152414), running simulations (floating-point math score of 99548), or handling concurrent virtual machines; the 24 threads and ECC memory support add reliability for long-running jobs. Students and office workers will find the system overkill for everyday tasks, but the single-thread score of 3927 ensures responsive applications, and the integrated Radeon 8060S provides a power-saving alternative for light work.

Small business workstations that run database servers, financial modeling, or engineering simulations will leverage the CPU's multithread score of 45231 and data compression score of 554760, which are strong for server-like workloads. The GPU is less relevant for these tasks, but its presence allows for occasional GPU-accelerated reports or visualizations. The 55 W CPU TDP makes it suitable for laptops in office environments, though the 120 W GPU TDP means the system will generate heat and require active cooling, which is typical for a performance laptop.

FAQ — 5-7 Q&A pairs answerable from FACT PACK data (format: Q: ... A: ...)

Q: What is the CPU's percentile ranking and how does it compare to its nearest rivals?

A: The AMD Ryzen AI Max+ 392 ranks in the 96th percentile of all CPUs. Its average benchmark score is 90541, which is 0.2% behind the Intel Xeon 654 (90717), 0.7% behind the AMD Ryzen 9 9955HX (91199), and 2.7% and 3.0% ahead of the Intel Xeon w7-2575X (88172) and Intel Xeon 6736P (87864), respectively.

Q: What is the GPU's memory configuration and bandwidth?

A: The NVIDIA RTX 5000 Mobile Ada Generation has 16 GB of GDDR6 memory on a 256-bit bus, delivering a memory bandwidth of 576.0 GB/s. The memory clock is 2250 MHz with an effective data rate of 18 Gbps.

Q: What is the GPU's benchmark score and how does it compare to older parts?

A: The GPU scores 3596 in 3DMark Steel Nomad DX12, placing it in the 21st percentile. It is within 1.5% of the NVIDIA GeForce GT 545 (3594), GT 735M (3616), GTX 1050 (3629), and AMD Radeon HD 6770 (3649), indicating performance similar to these much older GPUs.

Q: Does this system have measured frame rate data for games?

A: No, the FACT PACK contains no measured FPS data for this exact CPU+GPU combination. All gaming performance discussions are estimates based on the individual benchmark scores, not direct measurements.

Q: What are the CPU's core and thread counts, and what is its architecture?

A: The CPU has 12 cores and 24 threads, based on the Zen 5 architecture with the codename Strix Halo. It is manufactured on a 4 nm process by TSMC, with a base clock of 3.20 GHz and a boost clock of 5.00 GHz.

Q: What is the system's combined percentile and what does it indicate?

A: The combined system percentile is 59, which is a middling overall score. This indicates that the pairing of a 96th percentile CPU with a 21st percentile GPU results in an average overall performance tier, heavily influenced by the GPU's low ranking.

Q: What is the CPU's cache configuration and memory support?

A: The CPU has 80 KB of L1 cache per core, 1 MB of L2 cache per core, and 64 MB of shared L3 cache. It supports LPDDR5X memory in a quad-channel configuration with a bandwidth of 256.0 GB/s, and it supports ECC memory.

Build Overview — what this CPU+GPU pairing is, its class (desktop/laptop from buildClass), and overall tier from the percentiles

This build pairs the AMD Ryzen AI Max+ 392 with the NVIDIA RTX 5000 Mobile Ada Generation in a laptop-class system, as indicated by the buildClass field. The CPU is a 12-core, 24-thread Zen 5 processor with a 96th percentile ranking, making it one of the top-performing mobile CPUs in the database, while the GPU is an Ada Lovelace chip with 16 GB VRAM and a 21st percentile ranking, placing it in the lower tier of GPUs. The system's combined percentile is 59, which places it in the middle of the pack overall, reflecting the significant performance disparity between the two components.

The overall tier is defined by the CPU's dominance: this is a workstation-class laptop CPU paired with a mid-range discrete GPU. The CPU's average benchmark score of 90541 and its proximity to Xeon-level rivals (within 0.7%) suggest it is intended for professional computing tasks like software development, data analysis, and content creation, where multithreaded performance is critical. The GPU, with its 41.15 TFLOPS and 76 RT cores, is not a slouch, but its 21st percentile ranking means it is not suitable for high-end gaming or GPU rendering, as the Steel Nomad score of 3596 aligns with parts like the GTX 1050. The build is best described as a high-performance mobile workstation with a supplementary discrete GPU for moderate graphics workloads, not a balanced gaming rig.

CPU Analysis — cores, clocks, architecture, what the benchmark scores mean for real workloads

The AMD Ryzen AI Max+ 392 is a 12-core, 24-thread processor based on the Zen 5 architecture, codenamed Strix Halo, manufactured on a 4 nm process by TSMC. The die size is listed as 2x 70.6 mm², indicating a chiplet design, and the CPU operates at a base clock of 3.20 GHz with a boost clock of 5.00 GHz, with a TDP of 55 W. The cache hierarchy includes 80 KB of L1 per core, 1 MB of L2 per core, and 64 MB of shared L3 cache, which is a large pool that reduces latency for frequently accessed data. The CPU supports LPDDR5X memory in a quad-channel configuration, providing 256.0 GB/s of memory bandwidth, and it includes ECC memory support, a feature for data integrity in professional workloads.

The benchmark scores show a processor that excels in multithreaded and single-threaded tasks. The multithread score of 45231 and the average benchmark score of 90541 place it in the 96th percentile, meaning it outperforms 96% of CPUs in the database. The integer math score of 152414 and floating-point math score of 99548 indicate strong ALU and FPU performance, which directly translates to faster compilation, financial modeling, and scientific computing. The data encryption score of 27784 and data compression score of 554760 show the CPU handles security and archival tasks efficiently, and the extended instructions score of 45666 suggests good support for SIMD workloads.

In real workloads, the 12 cores and 24 threads allow heavy parallelization, so video encoding, 3D rendering (CPU-based), and running multiple virtual machines will see near-linear scaling. The single-thread score of 3927 is also high, ensuring that legacy or single-threaded applications, such as some office tools or older games, remain responsive. The physics score of 2887 is lower relative to other tests, but this is a specific benchmark for game physics, which may not reflect broader CPU performance. The 64 MB L3 cache is particularly beneficial for database workloads and large working sets, and the 256.0 GB/s memory bandwidth ensures the cores are fed data quickly, avoiding stalls. Overall, the CPU is a top-tier mobile part that can handle demanding professional workloads without being the bottleneck.

Gaming Performance — measured FPS by game and resolution from measuredFpsUltraByGame (or, if dataIsMeasured is false, frame expectations qualitatively from the benchmark scores and say the figures are estimates)

There are no measured FPS rows in the FACT PACK for this CPU+GPU combination, so this section cannot provide exact frame rates from testing. All gaming performance figures discussed here are estimates based on the benchmark scores of the CPU and GPU, and they should be treated as approximations, not measured data.

Based on the GPU's 3DMark Steel Nomad score of 3596, which places it in the 21st percentile and ties it with the NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 (delta -0.9%), the RTX 5000 Mobile Ada Generation is expected to deliver frame rates in the range of a GTX 1050 for traditional rasterized games. At 1080p resolution, this would typically mean playable frame rates (around 30-60 FPS) for modern AAA titles on medium settings, and higher frame rates (60-100 FPS) for esports titles like Valorant or Counter-Strike 2 on high settings, depending on the game's optimization.

At 1440p, the GPU's raw compute of 41.15 TFLOPS and 576.0 GB/s bandwidth provide some headroom, but the 21st percentile ranking suggests that ultra settings at this resolution would push the GPU to its limits, likely resulting in sub-30 FPS for demanding titles, forcing users to lower settings to high or medium for playable performance. At 4K, the 16 GB VRAM is sufficient for textures, but the rasterization performance is not, so frame rates would be low (20-40 FPS) even on medium settings, making 4K gaming impractical for anything but older or less demanding games.

The CPU's performance is not a limiting factor in gaming, as the single-thread score of 3927 is more than adequate for game logic, and the multithread score of 45231 handles background tasks. The system's combined percentile of 59 indicates that gaming performance will be below average compared to other systems with higher-ranked GPUs, and the 55 W CPU TDP plus 120 W GPU TDP means thermal throttling could further reduce frame rates in sustained gaming sessions on a laptop chassis. For users seeking high-refresh gaming (144 Hz or higher), this GPU would struggle to maintain such rates at 1080p in most modern titles, and the estimates suggest that a lower-resolution or lower-settings approach is necessary to approach those frame rates.

Rate My PC: AMD Ryzen AI Max+ 392 + NVIDIA RTX 5000 Mobile Ada Generation

Power Build

System Balance Analysis

AMD Ryzen AI Max+ 392

NVIDIA RTX 5000 Mobile Ada Generation

Market Position

Game Performance Benchmarks

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

Performance Insights

Strong Performance

Performance Tiers Explained

Ultimate

High-End

Mid-Range

Entry Level

Legacy

GPU Analysis — VRAM, bandwidth, clocks, RT/tensor hardware, what the benchmark scores mean for rendering

Usage Scenarios — grounded in the scores: high-refresh gaming, streaming, video editing, 3D rendering, software development, student and office work. One short paragraph per scenario, citing the numbers that support the verdict

Upgrade Path and Platform — socket, memory support, PCIe, PSU headroom from suggestedPsu/tdp, what a sensible next upgrade looks like

Balance and Bottleneck — which component limits which workload, using percentiles and FPS scaling as evidence

Benchmark Performance — exact CPU and GPU scores, percentile positions, and what the combined picture is

Who Should Build It — target users and industries (gamers at specific resolutions, content creators, developers, students, small business workstations) tied strictly to the measured performance

FAQ — 5-7 Q&A pairs answerable from FACT PACK data (format: Q: ... A: ...)

Build Overview — what this CPU+GPU pairing is, its class (desktop/laptop from buildClass), and overall tier from the percentiles

CPU Analysis — cores, clocks, architecture, what the benchmark scores mean for real workloads

Gaming Performance — measured FPS by game and resolution from measuredFpsUltraByGame (or, if dataIsMeasured is false, frame expectations qualitatively from the benchmark scores and say the figures are estimates)

4K Gaming Performance

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

1440p Gaming Performance

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

1080p Gaming Performance

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

Related Processors

Related Graphics Cards

Compare Your CPU

Compare Your GPU

Related PC Builds

Same CPU with Different GPUs

Same GPU with Different CPUs

Other Popular Builds