SYSTEM ANALYZER

Rate My PC: AMD Ryzen AI Max+ 392 + NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Mobile

Get a comprehensive performance analysis of your gaming rig with detailed benchmarks, bottleneck detection, and upgrade recommendations

Build Configuration

Select your components

PROCESSOR (CPU)

▼

GRAPHICS CARD (GPU)

▼

96 Score

Top 4% Ranking

96 / 100

ULTIMATE READY

Apex Performer

Top 4% of systems. Capable of 4K Ultra gaming and advanced rendering.

4K 60+ FPSVR ReadyRay Tracing

System Balance Analysis

CPU vs GPU performance ratio

Well Balanced

CPU

98%

GPU

95%

PROCESSOR

AMD Ryzen AI Max+ 392

90,541 Benchmark Score

Top 2% Market Ranking

View Full Specs →

GRAPHICS CARD

NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Mobile

38,135 Benchmark Score

Top 5% Market Ranking

View Full Specs →

Market Position

How your build compares to others

Budget

0-30

Mid-Range

30-60

High-End

60-85

Enthusiast

85-100

Your Build

Game Performance Benchmarks

Real-world 4K FPS in popular titles

View All Games →

Performance Insights

Tips to maximize your system

Optimal Performance

Your system is in the top tier. You can run any modern game at maximum settings.

4K Gaming Ready

Consider a 4K 144Hz monitor to fully utilize your hardware capabilities.

Compatible Games See what you can play Compare CPUs Find upgrades Compare GPUs Find upgrades

Performance Tiers Explained

90-100

Ultimate

4K Ultra gaming, VR ready, ray tracing enabled, professional workloads

4K 60+ FPS VR Ready

70-89

High-End

1440p Ultra or 4K High settings, excellent for modern AAA titles

1440p Ultra 4K High

50-69

Mid-Range

1080p Ultra or 1440p Medium, great value for most gamers

1080p Ultra 1440p Med

30-49

Entry Level

1080p Medium settings, suitable for eSports and older titles

1080p Med eSports

0-29

Legacy

Basic gaming, older titles, consider upgrading for modern games

720p-1080p Low Older Games

The AMD Ryzen AI Max+ 392 paired with the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Mobile is a mobile-class laptop combination that sits in the 96th percentile of all CPUs and the 81st percentile of all GPUs, yielding a combined percentile of 89 — a clearly high-tier portable pairing. The CPU is a 12-core, 24-thread Zen 5 "Strix Halo" part built on TSMC's 4 nm process, boosting to 5.00 GHz with a 55 W TDP, while the GPU is an Ada Lovelace AD104 chip with 7424 shading units and 12 GB of GDDR6 on a 192-bit bus. One important caveat applies throughout: no measured FPS data exists in the fact pack for this exact pairing, so all frame-rate discussion below is estimated from the benchmark scores rather than directly measured.

CPU Analysis

The Ryzen AI Max+ 392 is a mobile-segment processor from AMD's Ryzen AI Max generation, using Zen 5 architecture on the Strix Halo codename. It offers 12 cores and 24 threads — a thread count typically associated with desktop workstation silicon, compressed into a mobile design with a 55 W TDP. The base clock sits at 3.20 GHz with boosts up to 5.00 GHz, and the multiplier is locked, so there is no overclocking headroom to exploit.

The cache hierarchy is generous: 80 KB of L1 and 1 MB of L2 per core, plus a large 64 MB of shared L3 cache. That L3 pool matters for latency-sensitive workloads like gaming and compilation, where repeated access to working sets benefits from a big shared pool. The chip is manufactured on TSMC's 4 nm node across a two-die configuration of 2x 70.6 mm² die size, a chiplet-style layout that lets AMD pair substantial I/O and memory bandwidth with the Zen 5 compute dies.

Memory support is LPDDR5X in a quad-channel configuration with 256.0 GB/s of bandwidth — an unusually high figure for a mobile part and a key differentiator for memory-bound workloads. ECC memory is supported, which is notable for a mobile chip and relevant to professional users who need data integrity. PCIe connectivity is Gen 4 with 16 lanes from the CPU. Integrated graphics in the form of the Radeon 8060S are also present, giving the platform a fallback GPU.

Benchmark results indicate top-tier performance. The PassMark multithread score of 45231 and single-thread score of 3927 place the chip in the 96th percentile versus all CPUs, with an average benchmark score of 90541. The nearest rivals list shows how tight the competition is: the Intel Xeon 654 averages 90717 (a delta of -0.2%), the AMD Ryzen 9 9955HX averages 91199 (-0.7%), the Intel Xeon w7-2575X averages 88172 (+2.7% in the 392's favor), and the Intel Xeon 6736P averages 87864 (+3%). In other words, this mobile chip trades blows with Xeon workstation parts — a remarkable position for a 55 W design.

The individual test scores flesh out the picture. The integer math score of 152414 and floating point score of 99548 indicate strong general compute throughput. Data compression at 554760 and encryption at 27784 show capable throughput for archival and security workloads. Extended instructions scored 45666, reflecting AVX-class vector performance. Random string sorting at 59487, physics at 2887, and find-prime-numbers at 320 round out the suite. For real workloads, this means the CPU can handle multi-threaded rendering, code compilation, and video encoding without compromise, while the single-thread score keeps interactive application responsiveness high.

FAQ

Q: How many cores and threads does the Ryzen AI Max+ 392 have?

A: It has 12 cores and 24 threads, built on Zen 5 architecture under the Strix Halo codename.

Q: What socket does it use, and can it be overclocked?

A: It uses AMD Socket FP11, and the multiplier is locked — no overclocking is available.

Q: How does it compare to rival CPUs?

A: Its average benchmark score of 90541 sits within a fraction of a percent of the Intel Xeon 654 (90717, -0.2%) and AMD Ryzen 9 9955HX (91199, -0.7%), and ahead of the Intel Xeon w7-2575X (88172, +2.7%) and Xeon 6736P (87864, +3%).

Q: How much memory bandwidth does the platform provide?

A: LPDDR5X in a quad-channel configuration delivers 256.0 GB/s of bandwidth, with ECC support included.

Q: What GPU is paired with it here, and how does it rank?

A: The NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Mobile, an AD104-based Ada Lovelace chip that ranks in the 81st percentile of all GPUs.

Q: Are there measured FPS figures for this pairing?

A: No. The fact pack contains no measured FPS data for this combination, so any frame-rate discussion is an estimate derived from the benchmark scores.

Q: What is the GPU's VRAM capacity and bandwidth?

A: 12 GB of GDDR6 on a 192-bit bus, providing 432.0 GB/s of memory bandwidth.

Benchmark Performance

The CPU's headline numbers: PassMark multithread 45231, single-thread 3927, physics 2887, integer math 152414, floating point 99548, data compression 554760, data encryption 27784, extended instructions 45666, random string sorting 59487, and find prime numbers 320. The average benchmark score of 90541 and the 96th percentile position confirm this is elite company — only a small fraction of all CPUs in the database score higher, and the rivals clustered around it are Xeon workstation parts and the Ryzen 9 9955HX rather than ordinary mobile chips.

On the GPU side, the RTX 4080 Mobile posts a PassMark G3D score of 24926, a GPU compute score of 11191, a Geekbench OpenCL score of 159575, and a Geekbench Vulkan score of 145807. The G2D score is 929, and the DirectX sub-scores include 286 for DirectX 9, 244 for DirectX 11, 157 for DirectX 10, and 96 for DirectX 12. The average benchmark score of 38135 places it in the 81st percentile versus all GPUs.

The rival data shows the RTX 4080 Mobile effectively tied with some surprising company: the NVIDIA GeForce MX570 averages 38299 (-0.4%), the RTX 5080 Mobile averages 38349 (-0.6%), the desktop RTX 4070 averages 37648 (+1.3% in the 4080 Mobile's favor), and the Tesla P4 averages 37628 (+1.3%). The data indicates the 4080 Mobile is statistically level with the RTX 5080 Mobile on average benchmark score while sitting slightly ahead of the desktop RTX 4070.

The combined picture is a build in the 89th percentile — the CPU is the stronger of the two components relative to its peer group. With 24.72 TFLOPS of FP32 compute, 232 tensor cores, and 58 RT cores, the GPU carries substantial rendering and AI capability; the quad-channel 256.0 GB/s CPU memory subsystem complements it for workloads that spill beyond the GPU's 12 GB frame buffer.

Upgrade Path and Platform

The platform is defined by AMD Socket FP11 — a mobile, soldered form factor. That means the practical upgrade path is not the CPU socket but the surrounding platform choices. The chip supports LPDDR5X memory in quad-channel at 256.0 GB/s; because LPDDR5X is packaged memory on mobile platforms, memory is fixed at purchase time, so buyers should specify as much capacity as their workflow needs up front. ECC support is a genuine asset for workstation-adjacent use.

PCIe is Gen 4 with 16 lanes from the CPU, which matches the RTX 4080 Mobile's PCIe 4.0 x16 bus interface exactly — no bandwidth mismatch between the GPU link and the host platform. Those 16 lanes are CPU-only, so PCIe lanes are at a premium for additional devices. The GPU is an IGP-slot part with no power connectors; it draws its 110 W through the platform itself, and the suggestedPsu field is null, which is expected for a laptop build where power delivery is fixed by the chassis design.

Because the multiplier is locked and the socket is not user-serviceable, a sensible next upgrade means moving to a newer platform generation rather than swapping parts. The GPU's successor line is GeForce 50 Mobile, which provides the natural forward direction; the CPU's integrated Radeon 8060S remains available as a fallback should the discrete GPU be unavailable, though it is not in this build's performance tier.

Balance and Bottleneck

The percentile data makes the balance assessment straightforward: the CPU sits at the 96th percentile and the GPU at the 81st, with the combined build at the 89th. The CPU is therefore the stronger component relative to its peer group, and in GPU-limited workloads — gaming at higher resolutions and settings in particular — the RTX 4080 Mobile will be the limiting factor long before the Ryzen AI Max+ 392 runs out of headroom.

That imbalance is the good kind. A 24-thread Zen 5 CPU with a 45231 multithread score will not bottleneck a GPU whose PassMark G3D score is 24926; background tasks, streaming encodes, and shader compilation can proceed on spare threads without starving the GPU of frames. The physics score of 2887 supports this — CPU-side game physics and simulation load will not be the constraint.

The reverse case, CPU-bound workloads, plays to the build's strengths. Compilation, compression at 554760, and encryption at 27784 lean on the 96th-percentile CPU while the GPU idles or assists via its 11191 GPU compute score. No measured FPS data exists for this pairing, so bottleneck behavior in games must be estimated: given the GPU percentile of 81, frame rates at ultra settings will be GPU-determined at resolutions where the 12 GB buffer and 432.0 GB/s bandwidth are comfortable, with the CPU providing ample frame-delivery headroom.

Usage Scenarios

High-refresh gaming: With a GPU in the 81st percentile and 24.72 TFLOPS of FP32 throughput, high-refresh play at mainstream resolutions is well within reach, and the 3927 single-thread score keeps frame delivery consistent. All figures are estimates, as no measured FPS data exists for this pairing.

Streaming: The 12-core, 24-thread CPU can run encode and compositor workloads on spare threads while gaming, with the 64 MB shared L3 cache smoothing inter-thread data sharing. The 45231 multithread score indicates real capacity for concurrent work.

Video editing: The 256.0 GB/s quad-channel memory bandwidth is the standout asset here, feeding timeline scrubbing and effects preview. The GPU's 159575 Geekbench OpenCL score and 58 RT cores accelerate playback and effects rendering.

3D rendering: With the GPU compute score of 11191, 7424 shading units, and a CPU that matches Xeon workstation parts, viewport work and final renders both have strong hardware behind them. The 12 GB VRAM buffer handles moderately complex scenes.

Software development: The 152414 integer math score and 24 threads make compilation fast, and the extended instructions score of 45666 benefits vectorized workloads. Containerized development environments fit comfortably within 12 threads of spare capacity.

Student and office work: This is overkill in the best way — the 3927 single-thread score makes everyday applications instant, and the integrated Radeon 8060S provides resilience if the discrete GPU is unavailable. ECC memory support adds a layer of reliability unusual in this class.

Gaming Performance

No measured FPS rows exist for this exact CPU+GPU combination in the fact pack, and the dataIsMeasured flag is false. Every frame-rate statement in this section is therefore an estimate derived from benchmark scores, not a measurement.

The evidence base for those estimates: a PassMark G3D score of 24926, a Vulkan score of 145807, an OpenCL score of 159575, and a GPU percentile of 81. Rival positioning shows the card statistically level with the RTX 5080 Mobile (38349 average, -0.6%) and marginally ahead of the desktop RTX 4070 (37648, +1.3%), which suggests performance in the vicinity of upper-mainstream desktop cards rather than cut-down mobile parts.

At ultra settings, modern AAA titles should be playable at high resolutions, with the 12 GB of GDDR6 and 432.0 GB/s of bandwidth providing the headroom that texture-heavy scenes demand. The 80 ROPs and 133.2 GPixel/s pixel fill rate support high-resolution output. CPU-side, the 2887 physics score and 3927 single-thread score indicate that frame pacing and simulation load will not degrade the experience. Esports-class titles at competitive settings should run at very high frame rates given the GPU's tier, though again — these are score-derived expectations, not measured figures.

Build Overview

This is a laptop-class build: a mobile AMD Ryzen AI Max+ 392 CPU paired with the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Mobile discrete GPU, the latter an IGP-slot part with no power connectors that draws its 110 W through the platform. The combined percentile of 89 places the pairing firmly in the upper tier of the database, defined more by its CPU than its GPU — a 96th-percentile processor against an 81st-percentile graphics card.

The platform's identity is bandwidth and integration. Quad-channel LPDDR5X at 256.0 GB/s, ECC support, a 64 MB shared L3 cache, and on-package integrated graphics in the Radeon 8060S make this a dense, professional-capable mobile platform rather than a pure gaming chassis. The GPU contributes 12 GB of GDDR6, 232 tensor cores for AI workloads, and DirectX 12 Ultimate (12_2) support with Vulkan 1.4 and OpenGL 4.6.

Who Should Build It

Content creators are the primary audience. Video editors benefit from the 256.0 GB/s memory bandwidth and 159575 OpenCL score; 3D artists get workstation-grade CPU performance — within a fraction of a percent of the Xeon 654 — alongside a GPU that slightly outscores the desktop RTX 4070 on average benchmark results. Developers working with large codebases will appreciate the 24 threads and 152414 integer math score.

Gamers targeting high-refresh play at mainstream-to-high resolutions fit the profile, with the caveat that all frame-rate expectations here are estimates since no measured FPS data exists for this pairing. Students in technical fields get a machine that handles engineering simulations, compilation, and coursework with years of headroom, plus ECC memory for reliability.

Small business workstations are a strong match: the ECC support, Xeon-comparable CPU performance, and 64 MB shared cache make this credible for financial modeling, data analysis, and virtualization on the go. Buyers who need a single portable machine that competes with desktop workstation hardware — the 96th CPU percentile and 89th combined percentile say it does — are exactly who this build serves.

Rate My PC: AMD Ryzen AI Max+ 392 + NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Mobile

Apex Performer

System Balance Analysis

AMD Ryzen AI Max+ 392

NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Mobile

Market Position

Game Performance Benchmarks

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

Performance Insights

Optimal Performance

4K Gaming Ready

Performance Tiers Explained

Ultimate

High-End

Mid-Range

Entry Level

Legacy

CPU Analysis

FAQ

Benchmark Performance

Upgrade Path and Platform

Balance and Bottleneck

Usage Scenarios

Gaming Performance

Build Overview

Who Should Build It

4K Gaming Performance

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

1440p Gaming Performance

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

1080p Gaming Performance

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

Related Processors

Related Graphics Cards

Compare Your CPU

Compare Your GPU

Related PC Builds

Same CPU with Different GPUs

Same GPU with Different CPUs

Other Popular Builds