SYSTEM ANALYZER

Rate My PC: AMD Ryzen AI Max+ 392 + NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Mobile

Get a comprehensive performance analysis of your gaming rig with detailed benchmarks, bottleneck detection, and upgrade recommendations

Build Configuration

Select your components

PROCESSOR (CPU)

▼

GRAPHICS CARD (GPU)

▼

95 Score

Top 5% Ranking

95 / 100

ULTIMATE READY

Apex Performer

Top 5% of systems. Capable of 4K Ultra gaming and advanced rendering.

4K 60+ FPSVR ReadyRay Tracing

System Balance Analysis

CPU vs GPU performance ratio

Well Balanced

CPU

98%

GPU

93%

PROCESSOR

AMD Ryzen AI Max+ 392

90,541 Benchmark Score

Top 2% Market Ranking

View Full Specs →

GRAPHICS CARD

NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Mobile

27,435 Benchmark Score

Top 7% Market Ranking

View Full Specs →

Market Position

How your build compares to others

Budget

0-30

Mid-Range

30-60

High-End

60-85

Enthusiast

85-100

Your Build

Game Performance Benchmarks

Real-world 4K FPS in popular titles

View All Games →

Performance Insights

Tips to maximize your system

Optimal Performance

Your system is in the top tier. You can run any modern game at maximum settings.

4K Gaming Ready

Consider a 4K 144Hz monitor to fully utilize your hardware capabilities.

Compatible Games See what you can play Compare CPUs Find upgrades Compare GPUs Find upgrades

Performance Tiers Explained

90-100

Ultimate

4K Ultra gaming, VR ready, ray tracing enabled, professional workloads

4K 60+ FPS VR Ready

70-89

High-End

1440p Ultra or 4K High settings, excellent for modern AAA titles

1440p Ultra 4K High

50-69

Mid-Range

1080p Ultra or 1440p Medium, great value for most gamers

1080p Ultra 1440p Med

30-49

Entry Level

1080p Medium settings, suitable for eSports and older titles

1080p Med eSports

0-29

Legacy

Basic gaming, older titles, consider upgrading for modern games

720p-1080p Low Older Games

This pairing combines a 12-core Zen 5 mobile flagship with a mid-range Ada Lovelace discrete GPU, placing the overall system in the 85th percentile of all laptop configurations. The CPU is the standout component, sitting at the 96th percentile among all processors, while the GPU, at the 73rd percentile, provides a solid but secondary contribution to the platform's capabilities.

GPU Analysis

The NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Mobile is built on the Ada Lovelace architecture with a 5 nm process from TSMC, containing 22,900 million transistors on a 188 mm² die. The chip, designated AD106, operates with a base clock of 1395 MHz and a boost clock of 1695 MHz. The memory subsystem consists of 8 GB of GDDR6 on a 128-bit bus, delivering 256.0 GB/s of bandwidth. This bandwidth figure is identical to the CPU's memory bandwidth, which is notable for a system where both components share similar data throughput limits.

The GPU's compute resources include 4608 shading units, 144 texture mapping units, and 48 raster output units. For hardware-accelerated features, it houses 36 RT cores for ray tracing and 144 tensor cores for AI workloads. The raw compute figures show 15.62 TFLOPS for both FP32 and FP16 (1:1 ratio), with pixel and texture rates of 81.36 GPixel/s and 244.1 GTexel/s, respectively. The power envelope is rated at 115 W TDP, which is typical for a mobile discrete solution in this class.

Benchmark results place this GPU at the 73rd percentile of all GPUs, with an average benchmark score of 27435. The PassMark G3D score of 19587 reflects its overall DirectX performance, while the compute score of 8399 indicates its general-purpose processing capability. In DirectX 12, the score is 85, whereas DirectX 11 shows a higher score of 179, suggesting that the architecture performs relatively better under legacy APIs. The Geekbench OpenCL and Vulkan scores of 109197 and 108367, respectively, show strong cross-API consistency.

Comparing to nearest rivals, the RTX 4070 Mobile essentially matches the AMD Radeon RX 6700 XT with a deltaPct of 0, and trails the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3090 by only 0.5%. It leads the NVIDIA RTX PRO 4000 Blackwell by 1.1% and the AMD Radeon Pro Vega 20 by 1.5%. This positioning indicates that the mobile 4070 performs comparably to desktop-class GPUs from previous generations, making it a capable choice for demanding rendering tasks at 1080p and entry-level 1440p.

Usage Scenarios

High-Refresh Gaming: The GPU's 73rd percentile ranking and its near-parity with desktop GPUs like the RX 6700 XT suggest solid 1080p performance at high refresh rates. The PassMark DirectX 12 score of 85 and DirectX 11 score of 179 indicate that modern titles will run smoothly, though the 8 GB VRAM may limit texture quality in the most demanding games.

Streaming: The 144 tensor cores provide dedicated hardware for AI-based encoding and enhancement features. The GPU's compute score of 8399 supports concurrent gaming and encoding workloads, though the 115 W TDP means power allocation between the CPU and GPU will be a consideration in a laptop chassis.

Video Editing: The combination of the CPU's high single-thread score of 3927 and the GPU's 15.62 FP32 TFLOPS makes for a responsive editing experience. The 256.0 GB/s memory bandwidth on both CPU and GPU sides ensures smooth timeline scrubbing and effect application for 1080p and 4K footage.

3D Rendering: The GPU's 36 RT cores accelerate ray-traced rendering, while the CPU's 12 cores and 24 threads handle geometry and scene processing. The PassMark floating-point math score of 99548 on the CPU complements the GPU's compute capabilities for hybrid rendering pipelines.

Software Development: The CPU's 96th percentile ranking and strong integer math score of 152414 make compilation tasks efficient. The 64 MB shared L3 cache reduces latency for frequently accessed code segments, and the ECC memory support adds reliability for long-running builds.

Student and Office Work: This configuration is overkill for basic productivity, but the high single-thread performance ensures snappy application loading. The integrated Radeon 8060S graphics provide a fallback if the discrete GPU is disabled for power saving, though the primary workload benefits come from the CPU's responsiveness.

CPU Analysis

The AMD Ryzen AI Max+ 392 is a 12-core, 24-thread processor based on the Zen 5 architecture, codenamed Strix Halo. It operates with a base clock of 3.20 GHz and a boost clock of 5.00 GHz, manufactured on a 4 nm process at TSMC. The die size is listed as 2x 70.6 mm², indicating a chiplet design. The cache hierarchy includes 80 KB of L1 per core, 1 MB of L2 per core, and a substantial 64 MB of shared L3 cache.

Memory support is LPDDR5X with a quad-channel interface, providing 256.0 GB/s of bandwidth. This high bandwidth is critical for both CPU and GPU performance in a unified memory architecture. ECC memory is supported, which is unusual for a mobile processor and beneficial for workstation-class workloads. The socket is AMD Socket FP11, and the processor uses PCIe Gen 4 with 16 lanes available from the CPU.

The CPU's benchmark scores paint a picture of a well-rounded, high-performance part. The PassMark multithread score of 45231 places it at the 96th percentile of all CPUs. The single-thread score of 3927 is strong for mobile, enabling responsive day-to-day use. In specific workloads, the integer math score of 152414 and floating-point math score of 99548 show balanced arithmetic capabilities. Data compression at 554760 and encryption at 27784 demonstrate strong throughput for data-intensive tasks. The extended instructions score of 45666 indicates good SIMD performance, while the prime number finding score of 320 and physics score of 2887 are lower relative to other metrics.

Comparing to nearest rivals, the Ryzen AI Max+ 392 trails the Intel Xeon 654 by 0.2% with an average score of 90541 versus 90717. It is 0.7% behind the AMD Ryzen 9 9955HX (91199) but leads the Intel Xeon w7-2575X by 2.7% (88172) and the Intel Xeon 6736P by 3% (87864). This places it in direct competition with high-end workstation and enthusiast mobile processors, despite its 55 W TDP.

Gaming Performance

No measured FPS rows exist for this exact combination of AMD Ryzen AI Max+ 392 and NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Mobile. The FACT PACK contains no measuredFps data, so all FPS figures below are estimates derived from the benchmark scores and should be treated as approximate expectations rather than measured results.

Based on the GPU's average benchmark score of 27435 and its near-parity with the AMD Radeon RX 6700 XT (deltaPct 0), the RTX 4070 Mobile should deliver high frame rates at 1080p in most modern titles. The DirectX 11 score of 179 suggests that games using this API will run particularly well, while the DirectX 12 score of 85 indicates good but comparatively lower performance in newer titles that leverage the API's advanced features.

At 1440p, the 8 GB VRAM and 256.0 GB/s bandwidth may become limiting factors for texture-heavy games, but the GPU's 73rd percentile ranking supports playable frame rates in most titles. The CPU's 96th percentile ensures that it will not become a bottleneck at these resolutions, as its 45231 multithread score provides ample headroom for game logic and physics calculations.

For esports titles and less demanding games, the combination of the CPU's high single-thread score of 3927 and the GPU's 4608 shading units should produce very high frame rates, potentially exceeding 144 FPS at 1080p. For AAA titles, frame rates will vary widely based on optimization, but the hardware is positioned to handle high settings at 1080p and medium-to-high settings at 1440p.

Balance and Bottleneck

The CPU is clearly the dominant component in this pairing, sitting at the 96th percentile compared to the GPU's 73rd percentile. This creates an asymmetrical balance where the processor has significantly more headroom than the graphics card. In CPU-bound workloads such as data compression (554760), encryption (27784), and integer math (152414), the CPU will be the primary driver, and the GPU will have minimal involvement.

In gaming, the GPU is likely to be the limiting factor at higher resolutions. The CPU's 45231 multithread score and 3927 single-thread score provide enough processing power to feed the GPU at 1080p, but at 1440p and above, the GPU's 8 GB VRAM and 256.0 GB/s bandwidth will constrain performance. The FPS scaling between resolutions will show diminishing returns as the GPU becomes the bottleneck.

For mixed workloads like video editing or 3D rendering, the balance is more favorable. The CPU handles encoding and scene processing while the GPU accelerates effects and ray tracing. The 256.0 GB/s memory bandwidth on both sides ensures that data transfer between components does not become a bottleneck. However, the 55 W CPU TDP and 115 W GPU TDP mean that a laptop chassis must manage 170 W of combined heat, which could lead to thermal throttling in sustained workloads.

Who Should Build It

This configuration targets users who need strong CPU performance with capable, but not top-tier, GPU acceleration. Gamers at 1080p will find this system well-suited, with the GPU's 73rd percentile ranking supporting high settings in most titles. Those at 1440p will need to adjust settings but can still expect playable frame rates.

Content creators working with video editing or 3D rendering will benefit from the CPU's 96th percentile ranking and the GPU's 36 RT cores. The 64 MB L3 cache and ECC memory support make it suitable for professional workloads where data integrity is critical. Software developers will appreciate the strong integer math score of 152414 for compilation and the high single-thread score for tooling responsiveness.

Students in engineering or computer science programs will find the processing power sufficient for demanding coursework, while the laptop form factor maintains portability. Small business workstations requiring reliable performance for office applications, data analysis, or light CAD work will be well-served, though the configuration may be more powerful than strictly necessary for basic tasks.

Benchmark Performance

The CPU's average benchmark score is 90541, placing it at the 96th percentile of all CPUs. Its multithread score of 45231 and single-thread score of 3927 are strong indicators of balanced performance. The nearest rival, the Intel Xeon 654, scores 90717, a delta of -0.2%, meaning the Ryzen AI Max+ 392 is essentially tied with a workstation-class Xeon processor. The AMD Ryzen 9 9955HX scores 91199, 0.7% higher, while the Intel Xeon w7-2575X at 88172 is 2.7% lower, and the Intel Xeon 6736P at 87864 is 3% lower.

The GPU's average benchmark score is 27435, placing it at the 73rd percentile of all GPUs. Its PassMark G3D score of 19587 and compute score of 8399 reflect its capabilities. The nearest rival, the AMD Radeon RX 6700 XT, scores 27425 with a deltaPct of 0, making them performance twins. The NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3090 scores 27565, 0.5% higher, while the NVIDIA RTX PRO 4000 Blackwell at 27135 is 1.1% lower, and the AMD Radeon Pro Vega 20 at 27839 is 1.5% higher.

The combined percentile for this CPU+GPU pairing is 85, indicating that this laptop configuration outperforms 85% of all systems in the database. The CPU's high percentile is the primary contributor, while the GPU's moderate percentile tempers the overall ranking. This combined picture shows a system that excels at processor-intensive tasks while providing solid, but not exceptional, graphics performance.

FAQ

Q: What is the CPU's percentile ranking among all processors?

A: The AMD Ryzen AI Max+ 392 sits at the 96th percentile of all CPUs, with an average benchmark score of 90541.

Q: How does the GPU compare to desktop graphics cards?

A: The RTX 4070 Mobile has an average score of 27435, matching the AMD Radeon RX 6700 XT (deltaPct 0) and trailing the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3090 by only 0.5%.

Q: What is the memory bandwidth of the CPU and GPU?

A: Both the CPU and GPU have 256.0 GB/s memory bandwidth, with the CPU using quad-channel LPDDR5X and the GPU using 8 GB GDDR6 on a 128-bit bus.

Q: Does the CPU support ECC memory?

A: Yes, ECC memory is supported, which is beneficial for workstation-class workloads where data integrity is important.

Q: What is the combined performance percentile for this laptop?

A: The combined percentile for the CPU+GPU pairing is 85, meaning it outperforms 85% of all configurations in the database.

Q: What are the RT core and tensor core counts on the GPU?

A: The GPU has 36 RT cores for ray tracing and 144 tensor cores for AI workloads, providing 15.62 TFLOPS of FP32 and FP16 compute.

Q: How does the CPU compare to the Intel Xeon 654?

A: The Ryzen AI Max+ 392 scores 90541, which is 0.2% lower than the Intel Xeon 654's 90717, making them effectively tied in average benchmark performance.

Upgrade Path and Platform

The system uses AMD Socket FP11, which is specific to the Strix Halo mobile platform. Memory support is limited to LPDDR5X with a quad-channel interface, meaning memory is likely soldered and not upgradeable. The CPU provides PCIe Gen 4 with 16 lanes, while the GPU uses PCIe 4.0 x8, leaving additional lanes for storage or other peripherals.

The CPU has a 55 W TDP, and the GPU has a 115 W TDP, totaling 170 W of power draw for the primary components. No suggested PSU is listed, but the power connectors on the GPU are listed as "None," indicating it draws power from the motherboard or a proprietary connector. The slot width is listed as "IGP," which is unusual for a discrete GPU and may indicate a specialized integration.

A sensible next upgrade would focus on the GPU, as the CPU's 96th percentile leaves little room for improvement. However, the mobile form factor limits upgradeability, and the FP11 socket is unlikely to support future processor generations. Users should consider this a fixed-configuration system with performance determined at the time of purchase.

Build Overview

This laptop pairs the AMD Ryzen AI Max+ 392, a 12-core Zen 5 processor, with the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Mobile, an Ada Lovelace discrete GPU. The build class is laptop, and the combined percentile of 85 places it in the upper tier of systems. The CPU is the defining component, ranking at the 96th percentile with performance rivaling workstation-class Xeon processors. The GPU, at the 73rd percentile, provides solid mid-range graphics capability that matches desktop GPUs from the previous generation.

The system's overall tier is high-end mobile, with the CPU providing exceptional processing power for its 55 W TDP and the GPU delivering capable 1080p gaming and accelerated compute. The 256.0 GB/s memory bandwidth on both components ensures balanced data flow, while the 64 MB L3 cache and ECC support position this as a credible workstation alternative. This is a configuration where the processor outshines the graphics card, making it a better choice for CPU-intensive workloads than for those requiring top-tier graphics performance.

Rate My PC: AMD Ryzen AI Max+ 392 + NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Mobile

Apex Performer

System Balance Analysis

AMD Ryzen AI Max+ 392

NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Mobile

Market Position

Game Performance Benchmarks

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

Performance Insights

Optimal Performance

4K Gaming Ready

Performance Tiers Explained

Ultimate

High-End

Mid-Range

Entry Level

Legacy

GPU Analysis

Usage Scenarios

CPU Analysis

Gaming Performance

Balance and Bottleneck

Who Should Build It

Benchmark Performance

FAQ

Upgrade Path and Platform

Build Overview

4K Gaming Performance

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

1440p Gaming Performance

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

1080p Gaming Performance

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

Related Processors

Related Graphics Cards

Compare Your CPU

Compare Your GPU

Related PC Builds

Same CPU with Different GPUs

Same GPU with Different CPUs

Other Popular Builds