SYSTEM ANALYZER

Rate My PC: AMD Ryzen AI Max+ 392 + NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 Mobile

Get a comprehensive performance analysis of your gaming rig with detailed benchmarks, bottleneck detection, and upgrade recommendations

94 / 100
ULTIMATE READY

Apex Performer

Top 6% of systems. Capable of 4K Ultra gaming and advanced rendering.

4K 60+ FPSVR ReadyRay Tracing

System Balance Analysis

CPU vs GPU performance ratio
Well Balanced
CPU
98%
VS
GPU
90%
PROCESSOR

AMD Ryzen AI Max+ 392

90,541 Benchmark Score
Top 2% Market Ranking
View Full Specs →
GRAPHICS CARD

NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 Mobile

18,159 Benchmark Score
Top 10% Market Ranking
View Full Specs →

Market Position

How your build compares to others
Budget
0-30
Mid-Range
30-60
High-End
60-85
Enthusiast
85-100
Your Build

Game Performance Benchmarks

Real-world 4K FPS in popular titles
View All Games →

Performance Insights

Tips to maximize your system

Optimal Performance

Your system is in the top tier. You can run any modern game at maximum settings.

4K Gaming Ready

Consider a 4K 144Hz monitor to fully utilize your hardware capabilities.

Compatible Games See what you can play Compare CPUs Find upgrades Compare GPUs Find upgrades

Performance Tiers Explained

90-100

Ultimate

4K Ultra gaming, VR ready, ray tracing enabled, professional workloads

4K 60+ FPS VR Ready
70-89

High-End

1440p Ultra or 4K High settings, excellent for modern AAA titles

1440p Ultra 4K High
50-69

Mid-Range

1080p Ultra or 1440p Medium, great value for most gamers

1080p Ultra 1440p Med
30-49

Entry Level

1080p Medium settings, suitable for eSports and older titles

1080p Med eSports
0-29

Legacy

Basic gaming, older titles, consider upgrading for modern games

720p-1080p Low Older Games

# AMD Ryzen AI Max+ 392 + NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 Mobile

This laptop pairing combines AMD's top-tier Zen 5 mobile processor with NVIDIA's mid-range Ampere GPU, placing the system at the 79th percentile overall. The CPU is a clear standout, sitting at the 96th percentile among all processors, while the GPU trails at the 62nd percentile. This creates an interesting asymmetry: the processor is a workstation-class part, while the graphics chip is a capable but decidedly mid-range mobile solution. The data shows no measured FPS values for this exact configuration, so all gaming and graphics performance discussions below are estimated from the underlying benchmark scores.

CPU Analysis

The AMD Ryzen AI Max+ 392 is built on the Zen 5 architecture using the Strix Halo codename, manufactured on TSMC's 4 nm process. It packs 12 cores and 24 threads, running at a base clock of 3.20 GHz and boosting up to 5.00 GHz. The chip has a 55 W TDP, which is modest given its performance tier, and uses the AMD Socket FP11 platform. The processor features a substantial cache hierarchy: 80 KB of L1 per core, 1 MB of L2 per core, and 64 MB of shared L3 cache. Memory support includes LPDDR5X over a quad-channel interface with 256.0 GB/s of bandwidth, plus ECC support, which is unusual for a mobile part. The integrated Radeon 8060S GPU adds graphics capability independent of the discrete NVIDIA chip, and PCIe Gen 4 with 16 lanes (CPU only) provides connectivity.

Benchmark results reveal a processor with exceptional multi-threaded throughput. The PassMark multithread score of 45231 places the chip at the 96th percentile among all CPUs, and the average benchmark score of 90541 reinforces this position. The nearest rival, the Intel Xeon 654, scores 90717, a delta of only -0.2%, meaning the Ryzen AI Max+ 392 is essentially tied with that workstation Xeon. It also edges out the AMD Ryzen 9 9955HX by 0.7% (91199 vs 90541) and beats the Intel Xeon w7-2575X by 2.7% (88172) and the Intel Xeon 6736P by 3.0% (87864). The single-thread score of 3927 is strong for a mobile chip, indicating excellent per-core performance that will benefit lightly threaded workloads.

Looking at specialized workloads, the integer math score of 152414 and floating-point math score of 99548 suggest heavy compute capability, while data compression at 554760 and random string sorting at 59487 point to strong data-handling throughput. The extended instructions score of 45666 and data encryption score of 27784 indicate solid cryptographic and SIMD performance. The find prime numbers score of 320 is comparatively low but is a niche test. For real workloads, this means the CPU can handle complex simulation, large code compilation, and multi-threaded rendering without breaking a sweat. The 12-core/24-thread configuration with 64 MB of L3 cache is well-suited for tasks that benefit from high memory bandwidth and parallel execution.

Usage Scenarios

High-refresh gaming: The CPU's single-thread score of 3927 and 24 threads provide ample headroom for game logic and physics, but the GPU's 62nd percentile position will cap frame rates in graphically intense titles. For esports games at lower settings, the combination should sustain high refresh rates, but AAA titles at ultra settings will likely fall short of 144 Hz in most cases.

Streaming: The 12-core CPU with 24 threads can handle encoding, rendering, and gameplay simultaneously without becoming a bottleneck. The data encryption score of 27784 and extended instructions score of 45666 support efficient encoding workloads. The GPU's NVENC capabilities (though not directly benchmarked here) complement the CPU, though the 6 GB VRAM may limit streaming at high resolutions with overlays.

Video editing: The high multithread score of 45231 and strong memory bandwidth of 256.0 GB/s make this a capable platform for timeline editing and effects work. The CPU's 96th percentile position means timeline scrubbing and export will be smooth. The GPU's 13230 PassMark G3D score is sufficient for accelerated effects but will lag behind higher-tier GPUs in complex GPU-accelerated renders.

3D rendering: CPU-based rendering will excel here, with the Intel Xeon 654 rival (delta -0.2%) showing the chip trades blows with workstation processors. The floating-point math score of 99548 supports heavy simulation work. GPU rendering via the RTX 3060 Mobile will be workable but slower than dedicated render cards, given the 62nd percentile position.

Software development: With 24 threads and a single-thread score of 3927, compile times will be short for both incremental and full builds. The L3 cache of 64 MB shared helps with large codebases. The data compression score of 554760 indicates fast archive operations for dependency management and deployment tasks.

Student and office work: This configuration is massively overspec'd for basic productivity. The CPU's performance is far beyond what spreadsheets, documents, and web browsing require. The 55 W CPU TDP and 80 W GPU TDP suggest reasonable battery life under light loads, though the raw performance is aimed at power users, not note-takers.

Gaming Performance

No measured FPS rows exist for this exact CPU+GPU combination, so all frame rate figures below are estimates derived from the benchmark scores rather than direct measurements. The GPU's PassMark G3D score of 13230, positioned at the 62nd percentile, provides the primary basis for these estimates. The RTX 3060 Mobile is a 6 GB GDDR6 part with a 192-bit memory bus and 336.0 GB/s bandwidth, which suggests it can handle 1080p gaming comfortably in most titles.

At 1080p ultra settings, the estimated performance for AAA titles would typically range from 50-70 FPS, depending on the game's optimization. The GPU's texture rate of 171.0 GTexel/s and pixel rate of 68.40 GPixel/s support this estimate. For esports titles like competitive shooters, 1080p ultra could push into the 100-144 FPS range, given the efficient Ampere architecture. At 1440p, ultra settings would likely see frame rates drop to 35-50 FPS for demanding titles, as the 6 GB VRAM and 192-bit bus become limiting factors. The 3DMark Steel Nomad DX12 score of 1821 indicates modern DX12 titles will run but not at maximum quality. The DirectX 12 PassMark score of 58 and DirectX 11 score of 110 further suggest that older APIs perform relatively better than the latest API on this part.

The CPU-side advantage of the 96th percentile processor means that at 1080p, the GPU will almost always be the limiting factor in gaming. This is not necessarily bad: it means consistent frame times without CPU-related stutter, but it also caps overall performance. The 120 tensor cores and 30 RT cores are present but modest in count, so ray tracing effects should be used sparingly; enabling full ray tracing at ultra settings would likely halve estimated frame rates. DLSS could offset some of this, but the tensor core count at 120 suggests limited AI upscaling headroom compared to newer parts.

Who Should Build It

This laptop targets users who need workstation-class CPU performance but only require mid-range graphics. Content creators working primarily in CPU-bound software like video encoding, 3D modeling, or code compilation will find the 96th percentile processor and its 24 threads invaluable. The CPU's performance is competitive with the Intel Xeon 654 and AMD Ryzen 9 9955HX, making this a viable mobile workstation for engineers, data analysts, and scientists running multi-threaded simulations. Developers compiling large codebases will appreciate the single-thread score of 3927 and multithread score of 45231, which translate to fast iteration cycles.

Gamers at 1080p with modest expectations will find the RTX 3060 Mobile sufficient for 60 FPS in most titles, though those seeking 1440p high refresh rates should look elsewhere. The 6 GB VRAM is adequate for current titles at 1080p but may become a constraint in future releases. Students in engineering or computer science programs will benefit from the CPU power for their coursework, and the system can double as a gaming machine. Small business workstations running database, virtualization, or financial modeling workloads will leverage the 256.0 GB/s memory bandwidth and 64 MB L3 cache. The ECC memory support is a significant plus for professionals needing data integrity. This is not a budget system; it is a performance-first laptop for those who prioritize compute over graphics.

Benchmark Performance

The combined system sits at the 79th percentile, reflecting a substantial gap between the CPU and GPU tiers. The CPU's average benchmark score of 90541 places it at the 96th percentile, with its nearest rival being the Intel Xeon 654 at 90717 (-0.2% delta). The AMD Ryzen 9 9955HX trails by 0.7% at 91199, while the Intel Xeon w7-2575X (88172) and Xeon 6736P (87864) are 2.7% and 3.0% behind, respectively. These deltas show the Ryzen AI Max+ 392 performing at the level of entry-level Xeon workstation parts, which is remarkable for a 55 W mobile chip.

The GPU's average benchmark score of 18159 places it at the 62nd percentile, with rivals clustered tightly. The AMD Radeon Pro 5700 scores 18189 (-0.2% delta), the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2060 SUPER scores 18093 (+0.4%), the AMD Radeon RX 460 scores 18373 (-1.2%), and the Intel Arc A770M scores 18383 (-1.2%). This positioning puts the RTX 3060 Mobile in the same performance bracket as last-generation desktop mid-range cards, not current mobile flagships. The GPU's individual benchmarks show a strong compute capability: Geekbench OpenCL at 79483 and Vulkan at 80344, with a PassMark GPU compute score of 5718. The 3DMark Steel Nomad DX12 score of 1821 is modest, indicating limited DX12 performance headroom.

The combined picture is a system that excels at CPU-heavy tasks but is balanced by a GPU that performs at roughly 65% of the CPU's percentile standing. For workflows that are predominantly CPU-bound, this pairing is excellent. For GPU-bound workloads like 3D rendering or high-end gaming, the system will underperform relative to its processor's capabilities.

GPU Analysis

The NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 Mobile uses the GA106 chip on Samsung's 8 nm process, containing 12,000 million transistors across a 276 mm² die. This is an Ampere-architecture part with 3840 shading units, 120 TMUs, and 48 ROPs. The GPU has 30 RT cores and 120 tensor cores, providing ray tracing and AI acceleration features. Clock speeds are a modest 900 MHz base and 1425 MHz boost, with memory running at 1750 MHz (14 Gbps effective). The 6 GB GDDR6 memory sits on a 192-bit bus, delivering 336.0 GB/s of bandwidth. Compute performance is rated at 10.94 TFLOPS for both FP32 and FP16 (1:1), with a texture rate of 171.0 GTexel/s and pixel rate of 68.40 GPixel/s. The card uses PCIe 4.0 x16 and has a TDP of 80 W, with display outputs described as portable device dependent.

Benchmark results place this GPU at the 62nd percentile with an average score of 18159. The PassMark G3D score of 13230 indicates solid mid-range performance, while the G2D score of 588 is lower, suggesting modest 2D acceleration. The DirectX 11 score of 110 is notably higher than the DirectX 12 score of 58, implying better performance in older API workloads. The DirectX 10 score of 90 and DirectX 9 score of 146 show a clear regression in newer API paths. The 3DMark Steel Nomad DX12 score of 1821 confirms that modern DX12 games will run but at reduced settings.

For rendering, the 10.94 TFLOPS FP32 performance is adequate for GPU-accelerated effects in video editing and moderate 3D rendering. The 6 GB VRAM is the primary constraint—complex scenes with high-resolution textures will exceed this capacity, causing asset swapping. The 30 RT cores enable ray tracing, but with limited horsepower; real-time ray tracing at high quality is not realistic. The 120 tensor cores support DLSS, which can help recover performance, but the older Ampere implementation is less efficient than newer architectures. The 336.0 GB/s memory bandwidth is sufficient for 1080p gaming and 1440p with reduced textures, but it will bottleneck at higher resolutions or when using frame generation features.

FAQ

Q: What is the overall performance tier of this laptop combination?

A: The system sits at the 79th combined percentile, with the CPU at the 96th percentile and the GPU at the 62nd percentile.

Q: How does the CPU compare to server-grade processors?

A: The Ryzen AI Max+ 392 scores 90541 on average, which is 0.2% behind the Intel Xeon 654 (90717) and 2.7% ahead of the Intel Xeon w7-2575X (88172), making it competitive with entry-level Xeon parts.

Q: What is the GPU's memory configuration?

A: The RTX 3060 Mobile has 6 GB of GDDR6 memory on a 192-bit bus with 336.0 GB/s bandwidth and 14 Gbps effective memory speed.

Q: Does this system support ECC memory?

A: Yes, the CPU supports ECC memory, which is a significant feature for professional workloads requiring data integrity.

Q: What is the estimated gaming performance at 1080p?

A: No measured FPS data exists for this combination; estimates based on the GPU's 13230 PassMark G3D score suggest 50-70 FPS in AAA titles at ultra settings and 100-144 FPS in esports titles.

Q: How does the GPU compare to its nearest rivals?

A: The GPU's average score of 18159 is within 1.2% of the AMD Radeon RX 460 (18373), Intel Arc A770M (18383), AMD Radeon Pro 5700 (18189), and NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2060 SUPER (18093).

Q: What is the CPU's memory bandwidth?

A: The CPU supports quad-channel LPDDR5X with a total memory bandwidth of 256.0 GB/s, which is high for a mobile processor.

Build Overview

This is a laptop-class configuration (buildClass: "laptop") pairing AMD's Ryzen AI Max+ 392 mobile processor with NVIDIA's GeForce RTX 3060 Mobile GPU. The CPU is a 12-core, 24-thread Zen 5 part on the Strix Halo codename, manufactured on TSMC's 4 nm process, with a 55 W TDP. The GPU is an Ampere-architecture part on Samsung's 8 nm process, with 6 GB GDDR6 memory and an 80 W TDP. The overall system tier is 79th percentile, which indicates a strong performer but not a top-tier enthusiast machine. The CPU's 96th percentile ranking puts it in workstation-class territory, while the GPU's 62nd percentile is firmly mid-range. This asymmetry defines the system's character: it is a compute-first laptop with adequate graphics, suited for professionals who need CPU horsepower and gamers willing to accept mid-range graphics settings.

Balance and Bottleneck

The balance between CPU and GPU is heavily skewed toward the processor. The CPU's 96th percentile versus the GPU's 62nd percentile creates a 34-point gap, meaning the GPU will be the limiting factor in almost all graphics-related workloads. In gaming, this manifests as frame rates capped by the GPU's 13230 PassMark G3D score; the CPU's 3927 single-thread score will rarely be the constraint. For CPU-bound tasks like video encoding, the multithread score of 45231 will drive performance, and the GPU will sit idle or partially utilized. In mixed workloads like game streaming, the CPU can handle encoding while the GPU renders, but the 80 W GPU TDP limits how much headroom remains.

The 256.0 GB/s memory bandwidth of the CPU is shared with the GPU in some configurations (though this uses a discrete GPU), which could create contention. The GPU's 336.0 GB/s bandwidth is higher than the CPU's, but the CPU's quad-channel LPDDR5X is sufficient for its workloads. In practice, the bottleneck shifts depending on the task: gaming is GPU-limited, productivity is CPU-limited, and balanced workloads will see the GPU as the weaker link. The FPS scaling from the GPU's benchmark scores suggests that lowering resolution from 1440p to 1080p will improve frame rates more than lowering CPU-side settings.

Upgrade Path and Platform

The CPU uses AMD Socket FP11, which is specific to the Strix Halo platform. This is a mobile socket, so CPU upgrades are not feasible in the traditional sense—the processor is soldered to the motherboard. The platform supports LPDDR5X memory over a quad-channel interface with 256.0 GB/s bandwidth and ECC support, but memory is also likely soldered, limiting upgrade options. The CPU provides PCIe Gen 4 with 16 lanes, which is used for the discrete GPU and other peripherals. The GPU uses PCIe 4.0 x16, matching the CPU's lane configuration.

The GPU has a TDP of 80 W with no power connectors (portable device dependent), and the CPU has a 55 W TDP, so total system power is manageable. There is no suggested PSU listed, as this is a laptop with integrated power delivery. The GPU is marked as end-of-life (production status), meaning it is no longer in production, though the CPU is active. A sensible next upgrade would be a system with a newer GPU generation, as the RTX 3060 Mobile's 6 GB VRAM and 62nd percentile position are the primary limitations. However, given the CPU's workstation-class performance, upgrading the entire platform to retain the CPU (if possible) or moving to a laptop with a similarly powerful CPU and a higher-tier GPU would be the logical path. The 4 nm CPU process and 8 nm GPU process indicate different manufacturing generations, with the CPU being more advanced, so future GPU upgrades within the same laptop are not possible—the entire laptop would need replacement.