SYSTEM ANALYZER

Rate My PC: AMD Ryzen AI Max+ 392 + AMD Radeon 860M

Get a comprehensive performance analysis of your gaming rig with detailed benchmarks, bottleneck detection, and upgrade recommendations

Build Configuration

Select your components

PROCESSOR (CPU)

▼

GRAPHICS CARD (GPU)

▼

95 Score

Top 5% Ranking

95 / 100

ULTIMATE READY

Apex Performer

Top 5% of systems. Capable of 4K Ultra gaming and advanced rendering.

4K 60+ FPSVR ReadyRay Tracing

System Balance Analysis

CPU vs GPU performance ratio

Well Balanced

CPU

98%

GPU

93%

PROCESSOR

AMD Ryzen AI Max+ 392

90,541 Benchmark Score

Top 2% Market Ranking

View Full Specs →

GRAPHICS CARD

AMD Radeon 860M

26,401 Benchmark Score

Top 7% Market Ranking

View Full Specs →

Market Position

How your build compares to others

Budget

0-30

Mid-Range

30-60

High-End

60-85

Enthusiast

85-100

Your Build

Game Performance Benchmarks

Real-world 4K FPS in popular titles

View All Games →

Performance Insights

Tips to maximize your system

Optimal Performance

Your system is in the top tier. You can run any modern game at maximum settings.

4K Gaming Ready

Consider a 4K 144Hz monitor to fully utilize your hardware capabilities.

Compatible Games See what you can play Compare CPUs Find upgrades Compare GPUs Find upgrades

Performance Tiers Explained

90-100

Ultimate

4K Ultra gaming, VR ready, ray tracing enabled, professional workloads

4K 60+ FPS VR Ready

70-89

High-End

1440p Ultra or 4K High settings, excellent for modern AAA titles

1440p Ultra 4K High

50-69

Mid-Range

1080p Ultra or 1440p Medium, great value for most gamers

1080p Ultra 1440p Med

30-49

Entry Level

1080p Medium settings, suitable for eSports and older titles

1080p Med eSports

0-29

Legacy

Basic gaming, older titles, consider upgrading for modern games

720p-1080p Low Older Games

The AMD Ryzen AI Max+ 392 and AMD Radeon 860M combination represents a laptop-class platform built around a 12-core Zen 5 processor with a high-end integrated GPU. This pairing sits at the 84th percentile among all CPU+GPU combinations in the database, indicating a system that is positioned well above the median for overall computing capability. The data set is derived from synthetic benchmark scores, as no measured FPS rows exist for this exact combination. Consequently, all gaming performance discussions are framed as estimates derived from the CPU and GPU’s respective benchmark scores and percentile positions.

CPU Analysis

The AMD Ryzen AI Max+ 392 is a 12-core, 24-thread processor built on the Zen 5 architecture, specifically the Strix Halo codename, and fabricated on TSMC’s 4 nm process node. The chip has a base clock of 3.20 GHz and a boost clock of 5.00 GHz, which allows for substantial single-thread headroom when workloads demand it. The cache hierarchy is substantial: 80 KB of L1 per core, 1 MB of L2 per core, and a large 64 MB shared L3 cache. This configuration is designed to feed the cores efficiently, particularly for data-heavy tasks that benefit from a deep pool of fast-access memory.

The processor’s memory support is LPDDR5X over a quad-channel bus, yielding a memory bandwidth of 256.0 GB/s. This is a critical feature for a system that relies on integrated graphics, as the GPU has no dedicated VRAM and must share this bandwidth. The CPU also supports ECC memory, which is a notable feature for a mobile processor, and it provides PCIe Gen 4 with 16 lanes for the CPU, ensuring adequate connectivity for high-speed NVMe storage and discrete components if needed. The TDP is listed at 55 W, which is a modest figure for a 12-core part, suggesting a focus on power efficiency within a laptop chassis.

In multi-threaded workloads, the Ryzen AI Max+ 392 scores 45,231 points in Passmark’s multithread test. This places it in the 96th percentile of all CPUs, a position that underscores its capability for demanding parallel tasks. For context, the nearest rival is the Intel Xeon 654, with an average score of 90,717, which is 0.2% lower than this chip’s average benchmark score of 90,541. The Ryzen 9 9955HX is 0.7% faster, while the Intel Xeon w7-2575X and Xeon 6736P are 2.7% and 3% slower, respectively. In integer math, the CPU scores 152,414, and in floating-point math, it scores 99,548, demonstrating balanced arithmetic performance. The extended instructions score of 45,666 indicates strong support for modern SIMD workloads, which is useful for encryption and scientific computing.

Single-thread performance is equally impressive, with a Passmark single-thread score of 3,927. This is a high figure that places the chip among the top-tier mobile processors for responsiveness in lightly-threaded applications like word processing, web browsing, and legacy software. The data compression score of 554,760 and the random string sorting score of 59,487 further indicate that the CPU excels at data manipulation tasks, which are common in database management and file archiving. The physics score of 2,887 is moderate, but this is a synthetic metric that is less relevant to real-world gaming compared to the integrated GPU’s capabilities.

Benchmark Performance

The CPU’s average benchmark score across all tests is 90,541, placing it in the 96th percentile. This is a dominant position, with the nearest rival, the Intel Xeon 654, trailing by a negligible 0.2%. The AMD Ryzen 9 9955HX is the only close competitor that edges ahead, by 0.7%. On the other end, the Intel Xeon w7-2575X and Intel Xeon 6736P are 2.7% and 3% behind, respectively. This data indicates that the Ryzen AI Max+ 392 is not just competitive but a leader in its class, outperforming most server and workstation chips in aggregate CPU benchmarks.

The GPU, an AMD Radeon 860M, is a RDNA 3.5 architecture part built on the Krackan Point chip. It has a base clock of 600 MHz and a boost clock of 3000 MHz, which is a wide dynamic range that allows for significant power savings when idle and high performance when active. The GPU scores 22,759 in Geekbench OpenCL and 30,043 in Geekbench Vulkan, with an average benchmark score of 26,401. This places it in the 72nd percentile of all GPUs, a respectable position for an integrated solution. The nearest rivals are the NVIDIA GeForce MX550 (0.1% faster), the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5060 (0.3% slower), the AMD Radeon RX 5700 XT 50th Anniversary (0.6% faster), and the NVIDIA RTX A4000 (1.1% faster). This shows that the 860M is performing on par with entry-level discrete GPUs from several generations ago, which is a remarkable feat for an integrated part.

The combined percentile for this CPU+GPU pairing is 84th, indicating that while both components are strong individually, the GPU is the relative weak link compared to the CPU. The CPU’s 96th percentile score is significantly higher than the GPU’s 72nd percentile, which suggests that the system’s overall performance is gated more by the graphics solution than by the processor. In terms of raw compute, the GPU delivers 3.072 TFLOPS of FP32 performance, with FP16 at a 1:1 ratio, meaning it does not have a dedicated tensor core acceleration path. This is a moderate amount of compute for an iGPU, sufficient for 1080p gaming at medium settings and light creative workloads, but it will not rival high-end discrete GPUs in 3D rendering or heavy AI inference.

Balance and Bottleneck

The data reveals a clear imbalance between the CPU and GPU capabilities. The CPU operates in the 96th percentile, while the GPU sits in the 72nd percentile. In gaming scenarios, this means the Radeon 860M will almost certainly be the limiting factor in GPU-intensive titles, particularly at higher resolutions and detail settings. The CPU has ample headroom to feed the GPU, but the GPU’s rendering throughput will cap frame rates. For example, in a game that is bottlenecked by pixel fill rate, the GPU’s 48.00 GPixel/s output is the hard limit, and the CPU’s 45,231 multithread score will not overcome that constraint.

Conversely, in CPU-bound scenarios, such as physics simulation or AI pathfinding, the Ryzen AI Max+ 392’s strong single-thread score of 3,927 and high IPC from Zen 5 will ensure smooth performance, potentially allowing for high frame rates in less demanding games like esports titles. The memory bandwidth of 256.0 GB/s is a shared resource between the CPU and GPU, and in integrated graphics configurations, this can become a bottleneck. The GPU uses "System Shared" memory, and its bandwidth is listed as "System Dependent," meaning the quad-channel LPDDR5X is a critical asset. In memory-intensive games, the 256.0 GB/s figure is sufficient to prevent severe stuttering, but it is not as fast as the dedicated VRAM found on discrete cards.

The FPS scaling, while not measured, can be estimated from the benchmark scores. In a title that is heavily GPU-bound, the 860M’s average score of 26,401 would suggest frame rates comparable to an NVIDIA GeForce MX550, which is a low-end discrete GPU. In CPU-bound scenarios, the system would perform like a high-end desktop processor, with the 96th percentile CPU score allowing for extremely high frame rates in games that are optimized for multi-core processors. The overall picture is a system that is well-balanced for productivity and content creation, but where the GPU is the primary constraint for demanding 3D workloads. For users who prioritize gaming, the bottleneck will be the Radeon 860M, while for users who prioritize CPU-intensive tasks like video encoding or compilation, the system will feel exceptionally fast.

FAQ

Q: What is the CPU's multi-threaded performance compared to its closest rival?

A: The Ryzen AI Max+ 392 scores 45,231 in Passmark multithread, with an average score of 90,541. Its nearest rival, the Intel Xeon 654, has an average score of 90,717, which is 0.2% lower. The AMD Ryzen 9 9955HX is 0.7% faster, while the Intel Xeon w7-2575X is 2.7% slower.

Q: How does the integrated GPU compare to discrete graphics cards?

A: The Radeon 860M has an average benchmark score of 26,401, placing it in the 72nd percentile. It is 0.1% slower than the NVIDIA GeForce MX550 and 0.3% faster than the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5060, putting it on par with entry-level discrete GPUs.

Q: What is the memory configuration and how does it affect performance?

A: The CPU supports LPDDR5X memory over a quad-channel bus, providing 256.0 GB/s of bandwidth. This is shared with the integrated GPU, which relies on system memory for its VRAM, making bandwidth a critical factor for graphics performance.

Q: Is the CPU or GPU the limiting factor for gaming?

A: Benchmark data indicates the GPU is the limiting factor. The CPU is in the 96th percentile, while the GPU is in the 72nd percentile. In GPU-bound scenarios, the Radeon 860M will cap frame rates, while in CPU-bound scenarios, the processor has ample headroom.

Q: What is the process node and architecture of the CPU?

A: The CPU is built on the Zen 5 architecture (Strix Halo) and fabricated on TSMC’s 4 nm process node. The die size is listed as 2x 70.6 mm², indicating a chiplet design.

Q: Does the GPU support hardware ray tracing?

A: Yes, the Radeon 860M includes 8 RT cores. It supports DirectX 12 Ultimate (12_2), Vulkan 1.4, and OpenGL 4.6, indicating modern API support for ray-traced effects.

Q: What is the combined performance percentile of this system?

A: The combo of the Ryzen AI Max+ 392 and Radeon 860M is placed in the 84th percentile of all CPU+GPU combinations, reflecting strong overall system capability.

Upgrade Path and Platform

The platform is built around the AMD Socket FP11, which is a mobile-specific socket. The CPU is soldered to the motherboard, meaning there is no traditional upgrade path for the processor itself. Users are effectively locked into the Ryzen AI Max+ 392 for the life of the laptop. The memory is LPDDR5X, which is also soldered, preventing any user-upgradeable RAM. This is a closed platform designed for high integration and low power consumption, with the CPU and GPU sharing a unified memory pool.

The system provides PCIe Gen 4 with 16 lanes from the CPU. This is a high-bandwidth interface that allows for fast NVMe SSDs and potentially an external GPU enclosure, although the laptop form factor may limit that option. The integrated GPU has a bus interface of PCIe 4.0 x8, but since it is an IGP, it uses the system memory. The CPU’s TDP is 55 W, and the GPU’s TDP is 15 W, meaning the total chip power is 70 W under load. There is no suggested PSU listed, but for a laptop, the power delivery is handled by the battery and charger. The power connectors are listed as "None" for the GPU, confirming it draws power from the motherboard.

A sensible next upgrade for this platform is not the internal components, but rather the peripherals and storage. Users can install a high-speed PCIe Gen 4 NVMe SSD to take advantage of the 16 CPU lanes, which would improve load times and system responsiveness. For connectivity, the display outputs are "Portable Device Dependent," meaning users are limited to the ports provided by the laptop manufacturer. There is no room for a discrete GPU upgrade, so users who need more graphics power must look at a different platform entirely. The CPU’s ECC memory support is an unusual feature for a mobile platform, catering to niche professional use cases where data integrity is paramount, but it does not require any special upgrade consideration since the memory is fixed.

GPU Analysis

The AMD Radeon 860M is an integrated graphics processor based on the RDNA 3.5 architecture, built on the Krackan Point chip. It is a 4 nm part from TSMC, sharing the same process node as the CPU. The GPU has a base clock of 600 MHz and a boost clock of 3000 MHz, which is a high boost for an iGPU, indicating good thermal headroom in the design. The memory is "System Shared," meaning it uses the main system memory for its framebuffer, with a bus width and bandwidth listed as "System Dependent." This is the primary weakness of the GPU, as it relies on the CPU’s quad-channel LPDDR5X bandwidth of 256.0 GB/s, which is shared with the CPU.

The GPU has 512 shading units, 32 texture mapping units (TMUs), and 16 render output units (ROPs). This configuration yields a pixel rate of 48.00 GPixel/s and a texture rate of 96.00 GTexel/s. The compute capability is rated at 3.072 TFLOPS for both FP32 and FP16, with the latter at a 1:1 ratio, indicating no dedicated tensor cores for AI acceleration. The GPU includes 8 RT cores, which provide hardware support for ray tracing, a feature that is relatively uncommon in integrated graphics. This allows for ray-traced effects in supported games, albeit at a performance cost due to the shared memory bandwidth.

In benchmark tests, the Radeon 860M scores 22,759 in Geekbench OpenCL and 30,043 in Geekbench Vulkan. The average score of 26,401 places it in the 72nd percentile. This is a strong showing for an iGPU, as it matches the performance of the NVIDIA GeForce MX550, which is a discrete entry-level card. The nearest rivals include the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5060, which is 0.3% slower, and the AMD Radeon RX 5700 XT 50th Anniversary, which is 0.6% faster. This data indicates that the 860M is a capable solution for 1080p gaming at medium settings, and it can handle older titles at higher settings. For rendering workloads, the 3.072 TFLOPS of FP32 compute is sufficient for basic 3D modeling and video encoding, but it will struggle with complex scenes that require heavy compute or large texture memory.

Usage Scenarios

High-Refresh Gaming: The Radeon 860M’s 72nd percentile GPU score, combined with the CPU’s 96th percentile score, suggests that esports titles like Counter-Strike or League of Legends can run at high frame rates at 1080p with low to medium settings. The CPU’s strong single-thread score of 3,927 will prevent frame drops in CPU-intensive scenes. However, for AAA titles, the GPU’s 3.072 TFLOPS compute and shared memory bandwidth will likely cap frame rates to 60 FPS or lower at medium settings.

Streaming: The CPU is well-suited for streaming workloads. The 12 cores and 24 threads, with a multithread score of 45,231, provide ample capacity to encode video while gaming. The integrated GPU’s Vulkan score of 30,043 suggests it can handle the graphical load of a stream, but the overall system may struggle with simultaneous gaming and encoding at high bitrates, given the shared memory bandwidth.

Video Editing: The CPU’s high integer math score of 152,414 and data compression score of 554,760 indicate strong performance in video editing tasks like timeline scrubbing and effect rendering. The GPU’s 3.072 TFLOPS can accelerate some effects, but the lack of dedicated tensor cores means AI-assisted tools will run slowly. For 1080p editing, this system is capable, but 4K editing may be limited by the GPU’s memory bandwidth.

3D Rendering: The CPU’s floating-point score of 99,548 is strong for CPU-based rendering, but the GPU’s 3.072 TFLOPS is a limiting factor for GPU-accelerated renderers like Blender Cycles. The 8 RT cores provide some ray tracing capability, but the system will be significantly slower than a discrete GPU in this workload. It is suitable for light rendering tasks and previews, not final production renders.

Software Development: The CPU excels in this scenario. The 12 cores, 24 threads, and high single-thread score of 3,927 allow for fast compilation times and responsive IDEs. The 64 MB L3 cache reduces latency for frequently accessed code, and the 256.0 GB/s memory bandwidth improves performance for large data structures. This is a top-tier development machine.

Student and Office Work: This system is overkill for basic tasks like word processing and web browsing. The CPU’s 96th percentile score ensures instant responsiveness, while the GPU’s 72nd percentile score is more than enough for spreadsheet rendering and video playback. The 55 W CPU TDP and 15 W GPU TDP contribute to a power-efficient package that offers long battery life, which is ideal for all-day use in academic settings.

Build Overview

This build is a laptop-class system (buildClass: "laptop") that pairs a high-end AMD Ryzen AI Max+ 392 processor with a mid-range integrated AMD Radeon 860M GPU. The CPU is a 12-core Zen 5 part with a 96th percentile performance ranking, while the GPU is a RDNA 3.5 integrated solution with a 72nd percentile ranking. The combined system percentile is 84th, placing it in the upper echelon of all tested CPU+GPU combinations. This pairing is designed for users who need exceptional CPU performance for productivity, content creation, and software development, but who are willing to accept moderate graphics performance for gaming.

The architecture is notable for its unified memory design, where the CPU and GPU share a 256.0 GB/s LPDDR5X memory pool. This is a significant advantage for data-intensive tasks that require fast access to large datasets, but it is a constraint for graphics performance compared to discrete GPUs with dedicated VRAM. The system is not designed for high-end gaming or professional 3D rendering, but it excels in CPU-bound workloads. The overall tier is best described as a "performance mobile workstation" that can handle a wide range of tasks with aplomb, but it is not a dedicated gaming rig.

Who Should Build It

The target user for this system is a professional who prioritizes CPU performance over GPU performance. Software developers will find the 12-core, 24-thread processor with a 96th percentile score to be ideal for compiling large codebases, running virtual machines, and executing complex build scripts. The 64 MB L3 cache and 256.0 GB/s memory bandwidth reduce compile times and improve system responsiveness.

Content creators, particularly video editors and 3D modelers, will benefit from the CPU’s strong integer and floating-point scores (152,414 and 99,548, respectively), which accelerate rendering and encoding tasks. However, they should be aware that the Radeon 860M is not suitable for GPU-accelerated rendering at high quality. Students in engineering, data science, or computer science programs will find this system well-suited for running simulations, analyzing large datasets, and completing computationally intensive assignments. The ECC memory support is a niche feature that appeals to researchers who require data integrity.

Gamers are not the primary audience. While the GPU can handle esports titles and older AAA games at 1080p with medium settings, the 72nd percentile GPU score is a bottleneck for modern high-fidelity games. For small business workstations, this system offers a strong balance of CPU throughput and graphics capability for office applications, financial modeling, and light CAD work. The power efficiency of the 4 nm process, with a 55 W CPU TDP, makes it a practical choice for on-the-go professionals who need sustained performance without a large power brick.

Rate My PC: AMD Ryzen AI Max+ 392 + AMD Radeon 860M

Apex Performer

System Balance Analysis

AMD Ryzen AI Max+ 392

AMD Radeon 860M

Market Position

Game Performance Benchmarks

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

Performance Insights

Optimal Performance

4K Gaming Ready

Performance Tiers Explained

Ultimate

High-End

Mid-Range

Entry Level

Legacy

CPU Analysis

Benchmark Performance

Balance and Bottleneck

FAQ

Upgrade Path and Platform

GPU Analysis

Usage Scenarios

Build Overview

Who Should Build It

4K Gaming Performance

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

1440p Gaming Performance

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

1080p Gaming Performance

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

Related Processors

Related Graphics Cards

Compare Your CPU

Compare Your GPU

Related PC Builds

Same CPU with Different GPUs

Same GPU with Different CPUs

Other Popular Builds