SYSTEM ANALYZER

Rate My PC: AMD Ryzen AI Max+ 392 + AMD Radeon 8050S

Get a comprehensive performance analysis of your gaming rig with detailed benchmarks, bottleneck detection, and upgrade recommendations

Build Configuration

Select your components

PROCESSOR (CPU)

▼

GRAPHICS CARD (GPU)

▼

97 Score

Top 3% Ranking

97 / 100

ULTIMATE READY

Apex Performer

Top 3% of systems. Capable of 4K Ultra gaming and advanced rendering.

4K 60+ FPSVR ReadyRay Tracing

System Balance Analysis

CPU vs GPU performance ratio

Well Balanced

CPU

98%

GPU

97%

PROCESSOR

AMD Ryzen AI Max+ 392

90,541 Benchmark Score

Top 2% Market Ranking

View Full Specs →

GRAPHICS CARD

AMD Radeon 8050S

62,108 Benchmark Score

Top 3% Market Ranking

View Full Specs →

Market Position

How your build compares to others

Budget

0-30

Mid-Range

30-60

High-End

60-85

Enthusiast

85-100

Your Build

Game Performance Benchmarks

Real-world 4K FPS in popular titles

View All Games →

Performance Insights

Tips to maximize your system

Optimal Performance

Your system is in the top tier. You can run any modern game at maximum settings.

4K Gaming Ready

Consider a 4K 144Hz monitor to fully utilize your hardware capabilities.

Compatible Games See what you can play Compare CPUs Find upgrades Compare GPUs Find upgrades

Performance Tiers Explained

90-100

Ultimate

4K Ultra gaming, VR ready, ray tracing enabled, professional workloads

4K 60+ FPS VR Ready

70-89

High-End

1440p Ultra or 4K High settings, excellent for modern AAA titles

1440p Ultra 4K High

50-69

Mid-Range

1080p Ultra or 1440p Medium, great value for most gamers

1080p Ultra 1440p Med

30-49

Entry Level

1080p Medium settings, suitable for eSports and older titles

1080p Med eSports

0-29

Legacy

Basic gaming, older titles, consider upgrading for modern games

720p-1080p Low Older Games

The AMD Ryzen AI Max+ 392 and AMD Radeon 8050S form a laptop-class pairing that sits in the 93rd combined percentile across all tested builds. The CPU alone reaches the 96th percentile among all processors with an average benchmark score of 90,541, while the GPU lands in the 89th percentile with an average score of 62,108. This is a mobile platform with a 12-core, 24-thread Zen 5 processor and a Radeon 8050S integrated GPU based on RDNA 3.5, both built on TSMC's 4 nm process. No measured FPS rows exist for this exact combination, so all frame-rate discussions are estimates derived from the CPU and GPU benchmark scores and their relative positions to known rivals.

Balance and Bottleneck

The balance between this CPU and GPU is asymmetric. The CPU's PassMark multithread score of 45,231 and single-thread score of 3,927 place it in a league with workstation-class Xeon parts. It trails the Intel Xeon 654 by a mere 0.2% and the AMD Ryzen 9 9955HX by 0.7%, while leading the Xeon w7-2575X by 2.7% and the Xeon 6736P by 3.0%. This is a processor that can feed even demanding workloads without breaking a sweat. The GPU, however, is a different story. Its average benchmark score of 62,108 sits just 0.3% above the AMD Radeon Pro W6600M, but it falls 2.5% behind the Radeon Pro Vega 56, 2.6% behind the Radeon RX 7600M, and 2.7% behind the Radeon RX 9060 XT LP. The GPU is solidly mid-high tier, but the CPU is clearly the stronger component in raw processing terms.

The bottleneck depends heavily on the workload. For pure compute or compilation tasks, the CPU will be the dominant force, with the GPU barely involved. For gaming at high settings, the GPU becomes the limiting factor. The CPU's high single-thread score of 3,927 and 64 MB of L3 cache mean it can feed the GPU with frames quickly, but the GPU's 11.47 TFLOPS of FP32 compute and 64 ROPs will cap the frame rate well before the CPU runs out of headroom. The memory bandwidth of 256.0 GB/s from the quad-channel LPDDR5X is shared between CPU and GPU, which could introduce contention in memory-heavy scenes. In multi-threaded CPU tasks like data compression (554,760 in PassMark) or integer math (152,414), the CPU will run at full tilt, while the GPU remains idle. The data suggests a system that is CPU-bound in productivity and GPU-bound in gaming at higher resolutions.

Usage Scenarios

High-refresh gaming — The CPU's single-thread score of 3,927 and multithread 45,231 ensure that the processor never becomes a frame-rate limiter at common gaming resolutions. The GPU, however, will cap the achievable frame rate. Based on its average score of 62,108 and its position relative to the RX 7600M (2.6% behind) and the Radeon Pro W6600M (0.3% ahead), this system can push high frame rates at 1080p in most titles, but it will struggle to maintain the same at 1440p ultra settings. The GPU's 2,048 shading units and 64 ROPs are adequate for esports and moderately demanding titles, but the lack of a dedicated VRAM pool means bandwidth is system dependent.

Streaming — The CPU's strong multi-core performance is a boon for streaming. The PassMark data encryption score of 27,784 and the floating-point math score of 99,548 indicate that software encoding will not be a bottleneck. The 12-core, 24-thread CPU can handle both game rendering and a stream encoding workload simultaneously, with the GPU's 32 ray-tracing cores handling any visual effects. The 256 GB/s memory bandwidth ensures that the shared memory for the GPU does not starve the CPU when both are active.

Video editing — The CPU's integer math score of 152,414 and floating-point math of 99,548 suggest strong performance in timeline rendering and effect processing. The data compression score of 554,760 is particularly high, indicating fast file I/O and preview generation. The GPU's 11.47 TFLOPS of FP32 and 358.4 GTexel/s texture rate can accelerate effects and rendering in GPU-accelerated editors. The quad-channel memory with 256 GB/s bandwidth will help with large video files, and ECC support provides reliability for long render sessions.

3D rendering — The CPU's 12 cores and 24 threads are a solid foundation for CPU-based rendering engines, and the multithread score of 45,231 is close to that of the Xeon 654 (0.2% behind). The GPU, with 2,048 shading units and 32 ray-tracing cores, can handle GPU-accelerated renders, but its FP32 of 11.47 TFLOPS is modest compared to dedicated workstation GPUs. For scenes that rely heavily on ray tracing, the 32 RT cores will be a limiting factor, but for standard rasterization, the GPU is serviceable.

Software development — The CPU's integer math and random string sorting score of 59,487 indicate fast compilation and code execution. The PassMark extended instructions score of 45,666 suggests strong SIMD performance for scientific and data processing code. With 24 threads, parallel builds will be efficient. The GPU is less relevant here, but the CPU's 96th percentile overall means no compiler will feel sluggish.

Student and office work — The CPU's single-thread score of 3,927 is high enough for snappy spreadsheet and browser workloads. The low TDP of 55 W for both CPU and GPU makes this a laptop that can run on battery without thermal throttling. The integrated GPU is more than sufficient for 2D desktop rendering and video playback. The ECC memory support is an unusual but useful feature for research and data integrity.

Upgrade Path and Platform

The CPU is built on AMD Socket FP11, which is a mobile socket. This means the CPU is not upgradeable in the traditional sense; it is soldered to the board. The platform supports LPDDR5X memory in a quad-channel configuration, which provides 256 GB/s of bandwidth and ECC support. The memory is system-shared with the GPU, so the amount of RAM also determines the GPU's VRAM. The CPU offers 16 PCIe Gen 4 lanes, which can be used for an external GPU or high-speed NVMe storage, but the GPU itself is integrated and uses the same PCIe bus interface (the GPU's bus interface is listed as PCIe 5.0 x16, but it is an IGP).

For a future upgrade, the only practical path is to replace the entire laptop. There is no socket upgrade. The GPU is not replaceable. The PSU headroom is not applicable because the system is a laptop with a fixed power budget. The CPU TDP is 55 W and the GPU TDP is also 55 W, so the total thermal design power is 110 W, which is manageable for a high-end laptop cooling solution. The presence of ECC memory is a rarity in laptops and suggests a workstation-oriented design, but it does not change the fact that the CPU is soldered. A sensible next upgrade would be to a newer Strix Halo or successor generation, but that would require a new system.

Who Should Build It

This pairing is for users who need a single laptop that can handle both demanding CPU tasks and moderate GPU workloads. The 96th percentile CPU makes it a fit for developers compiling large codebases, data scientists running complex models, and video editors working with 4K timelines. The 89th percentile GPU, while not top-tier, can handle 1080p gaming and GPU-accelerated effects. The combined 93rd percentile shows that it is a top-tier mobile platform overall. For gamers, it is suitable for 1080p high-refresh gaming, but not for 1440p ultra. For content creators, the CPU is the star, with the GPU as a competent secondary engine. For students and office workers, the 55 W TDP and 12-core CPU provide longevity, but the GPU is overkill for basic productivity. Small business workstations that run simulation, data analysis, or moderate 3D CAD will benefit from the CPU's threading and the GPU's 11.47 TFLOPS. The laptop form factor and 4 nm process make it a portable workstation for field work.

GPU Analysis

The AMD Radeon 8050S is a mobile integrated GPU built on the Strix Halo chip with RDNA 3.5 architecture and a 4 nm TSMC process. It has 2,048 shading units, 128 texture mapping units, and 64 render output units. The base clock is 1295 MHz and the boost clock is 2800 MHz. The GPU's memory is "System Shared," meaning it has no dedicated VRAM; it uses the LPDDR5X system memory with a quad-channel interface. The system bandwidth is 256.0 GB/s, but the actual GPU bandwidth is "System Dependent" — it shares the same memory controller as the CPU. The GPU has 32 ray-tracing cores, which is a significant amount for an integrated part. The pixel rate is 179.2 GPixel/s and the texture rate is 358.4 GTexel/s. The FP32 performance is 11.47 TFLOPS, with FP16 at the same 11.47 TFLOPS (1:1). This means the GPU is not optimized for FP16 workloads. The GPU supports DirectX 12 Ultimate (12_2), OpenGL 4.6, and Vulkan 1.4, so it is fully modern. The GPU's Geekbench OpenCL score is 65,818 and Vulkan score is 58,398, averaging 62,108. This places it 0.3% above the Radeon Pro W6600M but behind the Pro Vega 56 by 2.5%, the RX 7600M by 2.6%, and the RX 9060 XT LP by 2.7%. In real terms, this is a capable GPU for 1080p gaming at medium-to-high settings, and for light 3D rendering. The shared memory architecture is a double-edged sword: it provides flexibility but also limits the GPU's ability to maintain high bandwidth under load. The 32 RT cores will help in ray-traced games, but the overall performance will still be constrained by the GPU's 11.47 TFLOPS.

FAQ

Q: What is the combined performance percentile of this CPU and GPU?

A: The combined percentile is 93, meaning it outperforms 93% of all tested laptop builds in the database.

Q: How does the CPU compare to the Intel Xeon 654?

A: The CPU's average score of 90,541 is 0.2% lower than the Xeon 654's 90,717. In practice, they are nearly identical in multi-threaded workloads.

Q: How does the GPU compare to the AMD Radeon RX 7600M?

A: The Radeon 8050S averages 62,108, which is 2.6% below the RX 7600M's 63,775. This means it is slightly less powerful in GPU compute and graphics.

Q: Does the GPU have dedicated VRAM?

A: No. The Radeon 8050S uses System Shared memory, so it uses the system's LPDDR5X memory. The bandwidth is 256.0 GB/s, but the effective GPU bandwidth is system dependent.

Q: What is the CPU's single-thread performance?

A: The PassMark single-thread score is 3,927, which is in the top 96th percentile of all CPUs. This is strong for gaming and general responsiveness.

Q: Is the CPU upgradeable?

A: The CPU uses AMD Socket FP11, which is a mobile socket. It is not user-upgradeable; it is soldered to the motherboard.

Q: Does the GPU support hardware ray tracing?

A: Yes, it has 32 ray-tracing cores. The GPU is based on RDNA 3.5 and supports DirectX 12 Ultimate, so it can handle ray-traced effects.

Benchmark Performance

The CPU's PassMark multi-thread score is 45,231, which is 0.7% below the Ryzen 9 9955HX and 0.2% below the Xeon 654. The single-thread score is 3,927, which is a high value for a mobile CPU. In specific workloads, the CPU scores 554,760 in data compression, 27,784 in data encryption, 45,666 in extended instructions, 320 in prime number finding, 99,548 in floating-point math, 152,414 in integer math, 2,887 in physics, and 59,487 in random string sorting. The average benchmark score is 90,541, and the CPU is in the 96th percentile of all CPUs.

The GPU's Geekbench OpenCL score is 65,818 and Vulkan score is 58,398, giving an average of 62,108. This places the GPU in the 89th percentile of all GPUs. The GPU is 0.3% ahead of the Radeon Pro W6600M but 2.5% behind the Pro Vega 56, 2.6% behind the RX 7600M, and 2.7% behind the RX 9060 XT LP. The combined system percentile is 93, indicating a high-end laptop. The CPU is a clear strength, while the GPU is a solid mid-high tier. The data shows a system that excels in CPU-heavy tasks like video editing, software development, and 3D rendering, while gaming performance is limited by the GPU.

Build Overview

This is a laptop-class build (buildClass is "laptop") that combines a 12-core, 24-thread Zen 5 CPU with a Radeon 8050S integrated GPU. The CPU is based on the Strix Halo codename, using a 4 nm TSMC process. The GPU is also 4 nm, with RDNA 3.5 architecture. The combined percentile of 93 indicates that this is a top-tier mobile platform, but the distribution of performance is uneven: the CPU is in the 96th percentile, while the GPU is in the 89th. The CPU has a TDP of 55 W, and the GPU has a TDP of 55 W, so the total thermal design power is 110 W, which is moderate for a laptop. The system uses LPDDR5X memory in a quad-channel configuration, providing 256 GB/s of bandwidth. The memory is shared between the CPU and GPU, which is typical for integrated graphics. The system is active and was released in early 2025 (GPU) and 2026 (CPU). It does not have a launch MSRP listed. The CPU is not multiplier unlocked, and the GPU is an integrated part of the chip.

CPU Analysis

The AMD Ryzen AI Max+ 392 is a 12-core, 24-thread processor based on the Zen 5 architecture, codenamed Strix Halo. It is manufactured on a 4 nm TSMC process, with a die size of 2x 70.6 mm². The base clock is 3.20 GHz and the boost clock is 5.00 GHz. The CPU has an L1 cache of 80 KB per core, an L2 cache of 1 MB per core, and a shared L3 cache of 64 MB. It supports LPDDR5X memory in a quad-channel configuration with a bandwidth of 256.0 GB/s, and it supports ECC memory. The CPU offers PCIe Gen 4 with 16 lanes (CPU only). The integrated graphics is a Radeon 8060S, which is a separate part from the Radeon 8050S in this build. The CPU's PassMark multi-thread score of 45,231 places it in the 96th percentile, just behind the Xeon 654 by 0.2% and the Ryzen 9 9955HX by 0.7%, while ahead of the Xeon w7-2575X by 2.7% and the Xeon 6736P by 3.0%. The single-thread score of 3,927 is strong for a mobile CPU, and the high L3 cache of 64 MB helps with memory-heavy workloads. The CPU's data compression score of 554,760 is remarkable, and its integer math score of 152,414 shows strong ALU performance. The CPU is a high-end mobile part, suitable for professional workloads.

Gaming Performance

No measured FPS data exists for this exact CPU and GPU combination. The FACT PACK contains no measuredFps rows, so all frame rate expectations are estimates derived from the benchmark scores and the relative positions to known rivals. Based on the GPU's average score of 62,108 and its percentile of 89, the Radeon 8050S is a capable 1080p GPU. It sits just 2.6% behind the RX 7600M, which is a known 1080p card. The CPU's single-thread score of 3,927 ensures that the processor will not be the limiting factor in games. For esports titles like CS:GO or League of Legends, the GPU should push high refresh rates at 1080p. For AAA games, 1080p at medium to high settings should be achievable, but 1440p will be a stretch. The shared memory bandwidth of 256 GB/s is sufficient for 1080p textures but may bottleneck at higher resolutions. The 32 RT cores will enable some ray-tracing, but the overall performance will be lower than a dedicated RTX GPU. In summary, this is a 1080p gaming laptop that can handle most games, but not at the highest settings in demanding titles. The CPU is overkill for gaming, but the GPU is the limiting factor.

Rate My PC: AMD Ryzen AI Max+ 392 + AMD Radeon 8050S

Apex Performer

System Balance Analysis

AMD Ryzen AI Max+ 392

AMD Radeon 8050S

Market Position

Game Performance Benchmarks

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

Performance Insights

Optimal Performance

4K Gaming Ready

Performance Tiers Explained

Ultimate

High-End

Mid-Range

Entry Level

Legacy

Balance and Bottleneck

Usage Scenarios

Upgrade Path and Platform

Who Should Build It

GPU Analysis

FAQ

Benchmark Performance

Build Overview

CPU Analysis

Gaming Performance

4K Gaming Performance

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

1440p Gaming Performance

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

1080p Gaming Performance

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

Related Processors

Related Graphics Cards

Compare Your CPU

Compare Your GPU

Related PC Builds

Same CPU with Different GPUs

Same GPU with Different CPUs

Other Popular Builds