SYSTEM ANALYZER

Rate My PC: AMD Ryzen AI Max+ 392 + AMD Radeon 780M

Get a comprehensive performance analysis of your gaming rig with detailed benchmarks, bottleneck detection, and upgrade recommendations

Build Configuration

Select your components

PROCESSOR (CPU)

▼

GRAPHICS CARD (GPU)

▼

94 Score

Top 6% Ranking

94 / 100

ULTIMATE READY

Apex Performer

Top 6% of systems. Capable of 4K Ultra gaming and advanced rendering.

4K 60+ FPSVR ReadyRay Tracing

System Balance Analysis

CPU vs GPU performance ratio

Well Balanced

CPU

98%

GPU

90%

PROCESSOR

AMD Ryzen AI Max+ 392

90,541 Benchmark Score

Top 2% Market Ranking

View Full Specs →

GRAPHICS CARD

AMD Radeon 780M

17,588 Benchmark Score

Top 10% Market Ranking

View Full Specs →

Market Position

How your build compares to others

Budget

0-30

Mid-Range

30-60

High-End

60-85

Enthusiast

85-100

Your Build

Game Performance Benchmarks

Real-world 4K FPS in popular titles

View All Games →

Performance Insights

Tips to maximize your system

Optimal Performance

Your system is in the top tier. You can run any modern game at maximum settings.

4K Gaming Ready

Consider a 4K 144Hz monitor to fully utilize your hardware capabilities.

Compatible Games See what you can play Compare CPUs Find upgrades Compare GPUs Find upgrades

Performance Tiers Explained

90-100

Ultimate

4K Ultra gaming, VR ready, ray tracing enabled, professional workloads

4K 60+ FPS VR Ready

70-89

High-End

1440p Ultra or 4K High settings, excellent for modern AAA titles

1440p Ultra 4K High

50-69

Mid-Range

1080p Ultra or 1440p Medium, great value for most gamers

1080p Ultra 1440p Med

30-49

Entry Level

1080p Medium settings, suitable for eSports and older titles

1080p Med eSports

0-29

Legacy

Basic gaming, older titles, consider upgrading for modern games

720p-1080p Low Older Games

The AMD Ryzen AI Max+ 392 is a 12-core, 24-thread mobile processor built on the Zen 5 architecture (Strix Halo) and manufactured on a 4 nm TSMC process. It features a base clock of 3.20 GHz and a boost clock of 5.00 GHz, with a 55 W TDP. Its integrated Radeon 8060S graphics are complemented in this build by the discrete AMD Radeon 780M GPU, which uses RDNA 3.0 architecture with 768 shading units and 12 ray-tracing cores. The CPU’s average benchmark score of 90541 places it in the 96th percentile among all CPUs, while the GPU’s average score of 17588 places it in the 61st percentile. The combined system percentile is 79, indicating a laptop-class pairing that is strong on the processor side but more modest on the graphics side.

Usage Scenarios

For high-refresh gaming, the Radeon 780M’s 61st percentile GPU standing and its 3DMark Steel Nomad DX12 score of 480 indicate that this system is not engineered to push 240 Hz panels in demanding titles. The CPU’s single-thread score of 3927 and multithread score of 45231 are exceptional, but the GPU will cap frame rates in graphically intensive games. Benchmark results suggest that high-refresh gaming is achievable only in esports or lighter titles, where the CPU’s strong single-thread performance can drive high frame rates without the GPU becoming the limiting factor.

Streaming workloads benefit from the CPU’s 24 threads and high multithread score of 45231, which is 0.7% behind the AMD Ryzen 9 9955HX (score 91199) and 0.2% behind the Intel Xeon 654 (score 90717). The data shows that encoding, simultaneous gameplay, and broadcasting can be handled by the CPU without stalling, though the Radeon 780M’s 8.909 TFLOPS FP32 throughput provides limited assist for hardware encoding tasks compared to dedicated GPUs. The 64 MB shared L3 cache and 256.0 GB/s memory bandwidth support smooth multitasking during streaming sessions.

Video editing relies on both CPU and GPU performance. The CPU’s floating-point math score of 99548 and integer math score of 152414 indicate strong processing power for timeline operations, effects, and exports. The GPU’s 48 texture mapping units and 32 raster output pipelines provide acceleration for previews and GPU-accelerated effects, but its 61st percentile ranking means 4K timelines with heavy color grading will be slower than with higher-tier graphics cards. The 256.0 GB/s memory bandwidth (quad-channel LPDDR5X) helps move frame data efficiently, but the system-shared GPU memory is a bottleneck for large video buffers.

3D rendering is dominated by the CPU in this build. The multithread score of 45231 is 2.7% ahead of the Intel Xeon w7-2575X (score 88172) and 3% ahead of the Intel Xeon 6736P (score 87864), making this processor competitive with server-class chips in CPU-bound rendering tasks. The Radeon 780M’s 8.909 TFLOPS FP32 and 12 ray-tracing cores offer some acceleration for GPU rendering, but the GPU’s 61st percentile position means it is not a primary rendering engine. For CPU-based renderers, this system excels; for GPU-based renderers, it is adequate but not outstanding.

Software development benefits from the CPU’s 12 cores and 24 threads, with a data compression score of 554760 and random string sorting score of 59487 indicating fast compilation and data manipulation. The single-thread score of 3927 is competitive, and the extended instructions score of 45666 shows strong SIMD performance for scientific computing. The 64 MB shared L3 cache reduces latency for frequently accessed code, and the ECC memory support (true) adds reliability for long-running build processes. The GPU’s role in development is minimal, but its Vulkan 1.4 support (score 33683) allows for basic graphics debugging.

Student and office work is easily handled by this configuration. The CPU’s 96th percentile ranking means that document processing, spreadsheets, and web browsing are effortless, while the 55 W TDP (though mobile-class) keeps thermals manageable in a laptop chassis. The Radeon 780M’s 61st percentile GPU is more than sufficient for display output and basic 2D acceleration. The quad-channel memory with 256.0 GB/s bandwidth ensures smooth multitasking across dozens of browser tabs and office applications, though the lack of a dedicated GPU option in this pairing limits any casual 3D work.

GPU Analysis

The AMD Radeon 780M is a mobile integrated graphics processor based on the RDNA 3.0 architecture, built on a 4 nm process at TSMC with 25,390 million transistors on a 178 mm² die. It operates with a base clock of 800 MHz and a boost clock of 2900 MHz, delivering a pixel rate of 92.80 GPixel/s and a texture rate of 139.2 GTexel/s. The GPU has 768 shading units, 48 texture mapping units, and 32 raster output pipelines, along with 12 ray-tracing cores. Its FP32 performance is 8.909 TFLOPS, with FP16 performance at 8.909 TFLOPS (1:1 ratio), indicating that half-precision workloads do not gain extra throughput.

The memory configuration is entirely system-shared, meaning the GPU uses the same LPDDR5X memory as the CPU, with a bus width and bandwidth described as “System Dependent.” In this build, the CPU’s quad-channel memory provides 256.0 GB/s of bandwidth, which is the effective ceiling for GPU memory transfers. This shared architecture avoids the cost of dedicated VRAM but creates contention between CPU and GPU memory access. The 12 ray-tracing cores support DirectX 12 Ultimate (12_2), OpenGL 4.6, and Vulkan 1.4, making the GPU feature-complete for modern APIs.

Benchmark results show the Radeon 780M scores 480 in 3DMark Steel Nomad DX12, 18602 in Geekbench OpenCL, and 33683 in Geekbench Vulkan. Its average benchmark score of 17588 places it in the 61st percentile of all GPUs, with nearest rivals including the AMD Radeon Pro 560 (score 17551, 0.2% behind), NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 (score 17639, 0.3% ahead), AMD Radeon HD 7790 (score 17666, 0.4% ahead), and AMD Radeon Pro 460 (score 17509, 0.5% behind). This grouping shows that the 780M performs near the level of a desktop GeForce RTX 4060 in synthetic benchmarks, but the RTX 4060 is a dedicated card with its own memory, while the 780M relies on shared system memory, which affects real-world rendering under memory pressure.

For rendering workloads, the GPU’s FP32 throughput of 8.909 TFLOPS is adequate for casual 3D modeling and lightweight GPU-accelerated effects, but the 61st percentile ranking indicates it sits in the lower-middle tier of graphics hardware. The 12 RT cores enable ray-traced effects in games that support them, but the 480 Steel Nomad score suggests that ray tracing at high resolution or with heavy scenes will struggle. The texture rate of 139.2 GTexel/s supports moderate texture filtering, but the 32 ROPs limit fill-rate-heavy tasks like high-resolution anti-aliasing.

Benchmark Performance

The CPU’s average benchmark score is 90541, placing it in the 96th percentile of all CPUs. Its nearest rivals are the Intel Xeon 654 (score 90717, 0.2% ahead), AMD Ryzen 9 9955HX (score 91199, 0.7% ahead), Intel Xeon w7-2575X (score 88172, 2.7% behind), and Intel Xeon 6736P (score 87864, 3% behind). This means the Ryzen AI Max+ 392 is effectively neck-and-neck with high-end Xeon processors and the top mobile Ryzen 9, with deltas under 1% for the top two rivals. The CPU’s single-thread score of 3927 and multithread score of 45231 confirm it is a top-tier mobile processor, though it trails the Ryzen 9 9955HX slightly in overall average score.

The GPU’s average benchmark score is 17588, placing it in the 61st percentile of all GPUs. Its nearest rivals are the AMD Radeon Pro 560 (score 17551, 0.2% behind), NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 (score 17639, 0.3% ahead), AMD Radeon HD 7790 (score 17666, 0.4% ahead), and AMD Radeon Pro 460 (score 17509, 0.5% behind). The 780M is thus statistically tied with a desktop RTX 4060 in synthetic average score, though the RTX 4060 has dedicated VRAM and higher sustained performance. The GPU’s individual scores—480 in Steel Nomad, 18602 in OpenCL, and 33683 in Vulkan—show that its Vulkan performance is significantly stronger than its DX12 performance.

The combined picture is a system with a 96th percentile CPU and a 61st percentile GPU, yielding a combined percentile of 79. This gap indicates that the CPU is dramatically stronger than the GPU, and the overall system tier is defined by the weaker component. In CPU-bound workloads like compilation, data compression, and physics simulation, the system performs at the top echelon of laptops. In GPU-bound workloads like gaming and 3D rendering, the system performs at a mid-range level, comparable to a desktop GPU from several generations ago. The 55 W CPU TDP and 15 W GPU TDP suggest that the system is thermally efficient, but the GPU’s low power envelope limits its peak performance.

Who Should Build It

Target users are those who prioritize CPU-intensive tasks over GPU performance. Software developers compiling large codebases will find the multithread score of 45231 and data compression score of 554760 compelling, as these tasks scale well with the 24 threads. Students in engineering or data science fields benefit from the 96th percentile CPU for numerical analysis, with the extended instructions score of 45666 supporting SIMD-heavy workloads. Small business workstations handling database operations or financial modeling will appreciate the ECC memory support and the integer math score of 152414.

Content creators who focus on CPU-based rendering or video encoding can leverage the 24 threads for exports and the 64 MB L3 cache for large project files. The GPU’s 61st percentile is sufficient for 1080p previews in video editors, but creators working with 4K or complex effects should look elsewhere. Gamers at 1080p with low-to-medium settings in esports titles will find the system acceptable, given the CPU’s single-thread score of 3927 can drive high frame rates in CPU-bound games, but the GPU’s Steel Nomad score of 480 means demanding 3D titles will run at reduced quality.

The laptop build class means this is not a desktop replacement for hardcore gamers or GPU renderers. It is better suited for professionals who need a portable machine with exceptional processor performance and adequate graphics for occasional 3D work. The 256.0 GB/s memory bandwidth supports large data sets, and the 12-core/24-thread configuration handles virtualization and multi-VM workloads. Users who run CPU-based machine learning inference or heavy spreadsheet models will see strong performance, while those expecting GPU-accelerated AI or high-fidelity gaming will be disappointed by the 61st percentile GPU.

Balance and Bottleneck

The data shows a clear imbalance: the CPU’s 96th percentile versus the GPU’s 61st percentile creates a system where the GPU is the primary bottleneck in graphics-intensive workloads. In gaming, the CPU can compute game logic and physics faster than the GPU can render frames, meaning the GPU will limit frame rates in most titles. The CPU’s multithread score of 45231 and single-thread score of 3927 are far above what the GPU’s 480 Steel Nomad score suggests is necessary for balanced performance. This is a CPU-first design, where the GPU is adequate for basic tasks but not for high-end gaming.

In CPU-bound workloads like compilation or data processing, the GPU is irrelevant, and the system performs at its 96th percentile. In mixed workloads like video editing, the CPU handles encoding and effects while the GPU accelerates previews—here, the GPU’s 61st percentile becomes the limiting factor for real-time 4K scrubbing. The 256.0 GB/s memory bandwidth is shared, so when the GPU accesses memory heavily, it can starve the CPU of bandwidth, creating a secondary bottleneck. The 64 MB L3 cache helps mitigate this for CPU workloads, but the GPU’s system-shared memory has no dedicated cache.

FPS scaling evidence comes from the GPU’s benchmark scores: the 33683 Vulkan score is nearly double the 18602 OpenCL score, suggesting that Vulkan-based games will perform better than OpenCL-optimized titles. The Steel Nomad DX12 score of 480 is low relative to the other scores, indicating that DX12 games will stress the GPU more. The CPU’s passmark physics score of 2887 is moderate, so physics-heavy games will not be CPU-limited, but GPU-heavy scenes will show significant frame drops. The combined percentile of 79 reflects this imbalance—the system is better than 79% of all laptops, but this is pulled down by the GPU, not the CPU.

Gaming Performance

No measured FPS data exists for this exact CPU-GPU combination. The FACT PACK contains no measuredFpsUltraByGame rows, so all frame rates discussed here are estimates derived from the benchmark scores. The GPU’s 61st percentile and 8.909 TFLOPS FP32 suggest that at 1080p with ultra settings, most modern AAA games will run between 30-60 FPS, depending on the title’s optimization for RDNA 3.0. Games that favor Vulkan (score 33683) will perform better than DX12 titles (Steel Nomad score 480).

For esports titles like competitive shooters or MOBAs, the CPU’s single-thread score of 3927 can drive high frame rates, and the GPU’s 768 shading units are sufficient for low-to-medium settings. Estimates suggest 100+ FPS at 1080p with competitive settings in lighter games. For graphically demanding titles like open-world RPGs, the GPU’s 32 ROPs and 48 TMUs will limit performance, with estimates of 30-45 FPS at 1080p ultra. The 12 ray-tracing cores enable RT effects, but the 480 Steel Nomad score indicates that enabling ray tracing will cut frame rates by half or more.

At 1440p, the GPU’s 61st percentile is insufficient for ultra settings, with estimates dropping to 20-35 FPS in AAA titles. The system-shared memory bandwidth of 256.0 GB/s is adequate for 1080p but becomes a bottleneck at higher resolutions where larger frame buffers are needed. The CPU will not be a limiting factor at any resolution, as its 96th percentile ensures it can feed the GPU faster than the GPU can render. Overall, the system is best suited for 1080p gaming at medium settings, with the understanding that these are estimates, not measured results.

CPU Analysis

The AMD Ryzen AI Max+ 392 is a 12-core, 24-thread processor using the Zen 5 architecture on a 4 nm TSMC process, with a die size of 2x 70.6 mm². It has a base clock of 3.20 GHz and a boost clock of 5.00 GHz, with a 55 W TDP. The cache hierarchy includes 80 KB of L1 per core, 1 MB of L2 per core, and 64 MB of shared L3 cache. It supports LPDDR5X memory via a quad-channel interface, providing 256.0 GB/s of memory bandwidth, and includes ECC memory support. The processor is unlocked (multiplierUnlocked: false) and uses the AMD Socket FP11, with PCIe Gen 4 and 16 lanes from the CPU.

Benchmark results show a multithread score of 45231, which is 0.7% behind the AMD Ryzen 9 9955HX and 0.2% behind the Intel Xeon 654, but 2.7% ahead of the Intel Xeon w7-2575X and 3% ahead of the Intel Xeon 6736P. The single-thread score of 3927 is solid for a mobile chip, while the floating-point math score of 99548 and integer math score of 152414 indicate strong arithmetic throughput. The find prime numbers score of 320 is low, suggesting that the processor does not excel at single-threaded integer loops, but this is offset by the high multithread performance.

The 64 MB shared L3 cache is a key feature, reducing memory latency for frequently accessed data and improving performance in workloads with large working sets. The 256.0 GB/s memory bandwidth is exceptional for a mobile processor, rivaling many desktop platforms, and supports the integrated Radeon 8060S graphics along with the external Radeon 780M. The 4 nm process and 55 W TDP make it power-efficient, but the 96th percentile ranking shows it competes with much higher-power desktop processors. For real workloads, the CPU excels at multithreaded tasks like video encoding, 3D rendering, and software compilation, while its single-thread performance is sufficient for everyday tasks and gaming.

Build Overview

This build pairs the AMD Ryzen AI Max+ 392 CPU with the AMD Radeon 780M GPU in a laptop form factor (buildClass: laptop). The CPU is a top-tier mobile processor, ranking in the 96th percentile of all CPUs with an average score of 90541, while the GPU ranks in the 61st percentile with an average score of 17588. The combined system percentile is 79, indicating that this laptop outperforms 79% of all systems in the database, but the wide gap between CPU and GPU percentiles defines its character.

The CPU is a Zen 5 Strix Halo part with 12 cores and 24 threads, built on a 4 nm process with a boost clock of 5.00 GHz and a 55 W TDP. The GPU is a RDNA 3.0 Phoenix-based integrated processor with 768 shading units, 12 ray-tracing cores, and a boost clock of 2900 MHz, drawing 15 W. The two are connected via PCIe 4.0 x8 for the GPU, while the CPU provides 16 PCIe Gen 4 lanes. The system uses quad-channel LPDDR5X memory with 256.0 GB/s bandwidth, shared between CPU and GPU.

Overall, this is a CPU-centric laptop build. The processor’s 96th percentile performance makes it a workstation-class CPU for mobile use, while the GPU’s 61st percentile is mid-range. The combined percentile of 79 reflects the GPU pulling the system down from what the CPU alone would achieve. This build is not for gamers seeking high-end graphics, nor for GPU renderers, but for users who need maximum CPU throughput in a portable form factor, with graphics that are sufficient for basic 3D and light gaming.

FAQ

Q: What is the CPU’s performance ranking compared to other processors?

A: The AMD Ryzen AI Max+ 392 has an average benchmark score of 90541, placing it in the 96th percentile of all CPUs. It is 0.2% behind the Intel Xeon 654 (score 90717), 0.7% behind the AMD Ryzen 9 9955HX (score 91199), and 2.7% ahead of the Intel Xeon w7-2575X (score 88172).

Q: How does the Radeon 780M GPU compare to a discrete graphics card?

A: The Radeon 780M has an average benchmark score of 17588, placing it in the 61st percentile. It is 0.3% behind the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 (score 17639) and 0.2% ahead of the AMD Radeon Pro 560 (score 17551), making it statistically similar to a desktop RTX 4060 in synthetic benchmarks.

Q: What is the memory configuration and bandwidth?

A: The system supports LPDDR5X memory via a quad-channel interface, providing 256.0 GB/s of memory bandwidth. The GPU memory is system-shared, meaning it uses the same memory as the CPU, with bandwidth described as “System Dependent.”

Q: Does the CPU support ECC memory?

A: Yes, the ECC memory field is set to true, indicating that the AMD Ryzen AI Max+ 392 supports error-correcting code memory, which is beneficial for reliability in workstation and server-like workloads.

Q: What is the CPU’s boost clock and TDP?

A: The CPU has a base clock of 3.20 GHz and a boost clock of 5.00 GHz, with a TDP of 55 W. This is a mobile-class processor with a 4 nm TSMC process node.

Q: What APIs does the GPU support?

A: The Radeon 780M supports DirectX 12 Ultimate (12_2), OpenGL 4.6, and Vulkan 1.4. Its Geekbench Vulkan score is 33683, while its OpenCL score is 18602, indicating better Vulkan performance.

Q: What is the combined system percentile?

A: The combined system percentile is 79, meaning this laptop configuration outperforms 79% of all systems in the database. This is driven by the CPU’s 96th percentile, offset by the GPU’s 61st percentile.

Upgrade Path and Platform

The AMD Ryzen AI Max+ 392 uses the AMD Socket FP11, which is a mobile-specific socket. The processor supports LPDDR5X memory via a quad-channel interface, with a maximum bandwidth of 256.0 GB/s, and includes ECC memory support. The CPU provides 16 PCIe Gen 4 lanes, while the GPU uses a PCIe 4.0 x8 interface. The memory bus is quad-channel, which is unusual for a mobile processor and contributes to the high bandwidth.

The CPU’s TDP is 55 W, and the GPU’s TDP is 15 W, but the integrated Radeon 8060S graphics (part of the CPU) also draw power from the same envelope. The suggested PSU is not specified (null), which is typical for a laptop build where power is provided by an external adapter. The total system power envelope is modest, with the CPU and GPU together drawing 70 W at maximum, leaving headroom for other components like storage and display.

A sensible next upgrade would be to replace the Radeon 780M with a higher-tier discrete GPU, but this is constrained by the laptop form factor and the PCIe 4.0 x8 interface. The CPU’s 16 PCIe Gen 4 lanes could support a faster GPU, but the system-shared memory and 15 W GPU TDP limit the current configuration. For desktop users, the FP11 socket is not compatible with standard desktop platforms, so upgrades would require a full laptop replacement. The 64 MB L3 cache and 256.0 GB/s memory bandwidth are already high-end for mobile, so further CPU upgrades within the same platform are unlikely. The platform supports ECC memory, which is rare in laptops and beneficial for workstation use.

Rate My PC: AMD Ryzen AI Max+ 392 + AMD Radeon 780M

Apex Performer

System Balance Analysis

AMD Ryzen AI Max+ 392

AMD Radeon 780M

Market Position

Game Performance Benchmarks

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

Performance Insights

Optimal Performance

4K Gaming Ready

Performance Tiers Explained

Ultimate

High-End

Mid-Range

Entry Level

Legacy

Usage Scenarios

GPU Analysis

Benchmark Performance

Who Should Build It

Balance and Bottleneck

Gaming Performance

CPU Analysis

Build Overview

FAQ

Upgrade Path and Platform

4K Gaming Performance

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

1440p Gaming Performance

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

1080p Gaming Performance

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

Related Processors

Related Graphics Cards

Compare Your CPU

Compare Your GPU

Related PC Builds

Same CPU with Different GPUs

Same GPU with Different CPUs

Other Popular Builds