SYSTEM ANALYZER

Rate My PC: AMD Ryzen AI Max+ 392 + AMD Radeon 740M

Get a comprehensive performance analysis of your gaming rig with detailed benchmarks, bottleneck detection, and upgrade recommendations

Build Configuration

Select your components

PROCESSOR (CPU)

▼

GRAPHICS CARD (GPU)

▼

93 Score

Top 7% Ranking

93 / 100

ULTIMATE READY

Apex Performer

Top 7% of systems. Capable of 4K Ultra gaming and advanced rendering.

4K 60+ FPSVR ReadyRay Tracing

System Balance Analysis

CPU vs GPU performance ratio

Well Balanced

CPU

98%

GPU

88%

PROCESSOR

AMD Ryzen AI Max+ 392

90,541 Benchmark Score

Top 2% Market Ranking

View Full Specs →

GRAPHICS CARD

AMD Radeon 740M

12,870 Benchmark Score

Top 12% Market Ranking

View Full Specs →

Market Position

How your build compares to others

Budget

0-30

Mid-Range

30-60

High-End

60-85

Enthusiast

85-100

Your Build

Game Performance Benchmarks

Real-world 4K FPS in popular titles

View All Games →

Performance Insights

Tips to maximize your system

Optimal Performance

Your system is in the top tier. You can run any modern game at maximum settings.

4K Gaming Ready

Consider a 4K 144Hz monitor to fully utilize your hardware capabilities.

Compatible Games See what you can play Compare CPUs Find upgrades Compare GPUs Find upgrades

Performance Tiers Explained

90-100

Ultimate

4K Ultra gaming, VR ready, ray tracing enabled, professional workloads

4K 60+ FPS VR Ready

70-89

High-End

1440p Ultra or 4K High settings, excellent for modern AAA titles

1440p Ultra 4K High

50-69

Mid-Range

1080p Ultra or 1440p Medium, great value for most gamers

1080p Ultra 1440p Med

30-49

Entry Level

1080p Medium settings, suitable for eSports and older titles

1080p Med eSports

0-29

Legacy

Basic gaming, older titles, consider upgrading for modern games

720p-1080p Low Older Games

The AMD Ryzen AI Max+ 392 paired with the AMD Radeon 740M represents a unique configuration in the mobile landscape, combining a top-tier 12-core Zen 5 processor with a modest entry-level integrated GPU. The CPU sits in the 96th percentile of all processors, while the GPU occupies the 53rd percentile, creating a substantial performance asymmetry that defines this platform's capabilities. The following analysis is derived exclusively from the provided benchmark data, with all performance interpretations grounded in the specified scores and percentile positions.

Usage Scenarios

High-refresh gaming is not a realistic target for this configuration. The Radeon 740M's benchmark scores—a Geekbench OpenCL score of 10172 and Vulkan score of 15568—place it in the 53rd percentile of all GPUs, directly comparable to the AMD FirePro W5100 and NVIDIA GeForce GTX 590. These scores indicate that even at lower resolutions, the GPU will struggle to maintain high frame rates in demanding titles. The CPU's exceptional Passmark single-thread score of 3927 ensures that frame pacing will be consistent, but the GPU's 2.867 TFLOPS FP32 throughput and 8 ROPs create a hard ceiling for gaming performance.

Streaming workloads benefit significantly from the CPU's 24 threads and robust multi-threaded performance. The Passmark multithread score of 45231 places this processor in the 96th percentile, with an average benchmark score of 90541 that is only 0.2% behind the Intel Xeon 654. The 12 cores and 24 threads provide ample headroom for simultaneous encoding and gameplay capture, though the GPU's limited capabilities will constrain the gaming side of the streaming equation. The 256.0 GB/s memory bandwidth and quad-channel LPDDR5X support further enhance the system's ability to handle concurrent workloads.

Video editing represents a mixed scenario. The CPU's Passmark integer math score of 152414 and floating point math score of 99548 indicate strong processing power for codec operations and effects processing. The 64 MB shared L3 cache and 4 nm process node contribute to efficient data handling. However, the Radeon 740M's 256 shading units and 16 TMUs provide limited GPU acceleration for effects, rendering, and export tasks. Editors working with 1080p footage will find the CPU sufficient, but 4K timelines will expose the GPU's constraints.

3D rendering is heavily CPU-bound in this configuration, which is advantageous given the processor's capabilities. The Passmark extended instructions score of 45666 and find prime numbers score of 320 reflect strong computational throughput for physics calculations and ray tracing preparation. The CPU's 96th percentile ranking places it above the AMD Ryzen 9 9955HX by 0.7% and the Intel Xeon w7-2575X by 2.7%. However, the GPU's 4 RT cores and 2.867 TFLOPS FP32 performance will limit GPU-accelerated rendering applications, making this a CPU-centric rendering workstation.

Software development workloads are well-served by this CPU's architecture. The Zen 5 design with 12 cores and 24 threads, combined with the 80 KB L1 cache per core and 1 MB L2 cache per core, provides excellent compilation performance. The Passmark data compression score of 554760 and random string sorting score of 59487 indicate strong performance for build tools and code analysis. The 96th percentile CPU ranking ensures that developers working with large codebases will experience minimal compilation bottlenecks, though the GPU's modest capabilities limit GPU-accelerated development tools.

Student and office work is where this configuration excels in terms of CPU performance but may be overkill. The Passmark single-thread score of 3927 ensures snappy application launches and responsive productivity suites. The 96th percentile CPU ranking provides far more processing power than typical office workloads require, while the GPU's 53rd percentile position is adequate for basic display output and 2D applications. The 55 W TDP for the CPU and 45 W TDP for the GPU indicate reasonable power consumption for a laptop platform, making this suitable for all-day academic use.

Benchmark Performance

The CPU's average benchmark score of 90541 places it in the 96th percentile of all processors, with nearest rivals including the Intel Xeon 654 at 90717 (0.2% ahead), the AMD Ryzen 9 9955HX at 91199 (0.7% ahead), and the Intel Xeon w7-2575X at 88172 (2.7% behind). This positioning demonstrates that the Ryzen AI Max+ 392 competes directly with enterprise-grade server processors while maintaining a mobile form factor. The individual Passmark scores reveal a balanced profile: integer math at 152414, floating point math at 99548, extended instructions at 45666, and multithread at 45231.

The GPU's average benchmark score of 12870 places it in the 53rd percentile of all GPUs, with nearest rivals including the AMD FirePro W5100 at 12847 (0.2% ahead), AMD Radeon Pro 455 at 12831 (0.3% ahead), and NVIDIA GeForce GTX 590 at 12830 (0.3% ahead). The Geekbench OpenCL score of 10172 and Vulkan score of 15568 demonstrate that the GPU's compute capabilities are modest but functional. The combined percentile of 75 for this CPU+GPU pairing reflects the significant gap between the processor's elite status and the graphics solution's mid-range position.

The combined picture shows a system where the CPU is the clear performance driver. The 96th percentile CPU ranking versus the 53rd percentile GPU ranking creates a 43-percentage-point disparity, indicating that this configuration prioritizes processing power over graphics capability. The average benchmark scores—90541 for CPU versus 12870 for GPU—reinforce this asymmetry, with the CPU outperforming the GPU by a factor of approximately seven in their respective average scores.

Gaming Performance

No measured FPS data exists for this exact CPU+GPU combination. The FACT PACK contains no measuredFpsUltraByGame entries, and the dataIsMeasured field is false. Therefore, all frame rate discussions are estimates derived from the benchmark scores and should be treated as approximations rather than verified results.

Based on the GPU's benchmark performance, this configuration is suitable for esports titles and older games at 1080p with reduced settings. The Radeon 740M's 2.867 TFLOPS FP32 throughput and 256 shading units place it in the same performance class as the AMD FirePro W5100 and NVIDIA GeForce GTX 590, both of which are legacy products. The 8 ROPs and 16 TMUs limit fill-rate-bound scenarios, while the 4 RT cores provide minimal ray tracing capability.

At 1080p with medium to low settings, competitive games such as multiplayer shooters and MOBAs may achieve playable frame rates in the 30-60 FPS range. The CPU's strong single-thread performance ensures that CPU-bound scenarios will not bottleneck the GPU. However, at 1440p or 4K, the GPU's limited pixel rate of 22.40 GPixel/s and texture rate of 44.80 GTexel/s will result in sub-30 FPS performance in most modern titles.

The Vulkan score of 15568 suggests that Vulkan-based games may perform relatively better than DirectX titles, as the API's lower overhead can help mitigate the GPU's modest hardware resources. The DirectX 12 Ultimate support provides access to modern rendering features, but the underlying hardware limitations will prevent these features from being fully utilized at playable frame rates.

Who Should Build It

This configuration targets users who prioritize CPU performance above all else in a laptop form factor. The 96th percentile CPU ranking makes this suitable for professionals working with CPU-intensive applications such as software compilation, data analysis, scientific computing, and virtualization. The 24 threads and 64 MB shared L3 cache provide exceptional multi-tasking capabilities for developers running multiple virtual machines or containers.

Content creators working primarily with CPU-based workflows—such as audio production, document processing, and 2D graphics—will find the Ryzen AI Max+ 392 sufficient for their needs. The Passmark data compression score of 554760 indicates strong performance for archive management and file processing. However, creators requiring GPU acceleration for video editing or 3D rendering should consider this configuration inadequate due to the Radeon 740M's limitations.

Students in engineering, computer science, or data science programs will benefit from the CPU's computational power for simulations, statistical analysis, and algorithm development. The 55 W TDP ensures that the laptop can sustain performance during extended study sessions without excessive heat generation. The quad-channel LPDDR5X memory support with 256.0 GB/s bandwidth provides sufficient memory throughput for large datasets.

Small business workstations requiring reliable multi-threaded performance for database management, financial modeling, or ERP systems will find this configuration suitable. The ECC memory support adds reliability for critical business applications. The PCIe Gen 4 with 16 lanes provides adequate connectivity for high-speed storage and peripheral devices.

Upgrade Path and Platform

The AMD Socket FP11 platform supports the Ryzen AI Max+ 392, which uses the Zen 5 architecture with the Strix Halo codename. The CPU is not multiplier unlocked, limiting overclocking potential. The platform supports LPDDR5X memory in a quad-channel configuration, providing 256.0 GB/s of memory bandwidth. ECC memory support enhances data integrity for professional workloads.

The integrated Radeon 8060S GPU within the CPU provides an alternative graphics solution, though its performance characteristics are not detailed in the benchmark data. The Radeon 740M operates on the PCIe 4.0 x8 bus interface, which provides adequate bandwidth for its performance class. The system's PCIe Gen 4 with 16 lanes from the CPU allows for expansion cards, though the laptop form factor limits physical expansion options.

A sensible next upgrade would focus on improving graphics performance, as the CPU has substantial headroom that the current GPU cannot utilize. However, the integrated nature of the Radeon 740M and the laptop form factor restrict upgrade options. The 45 W GPU TDP and 55 W CPU TDP suggest that the platform's power delivery is designed for efficiency rather than maximum performance. The CPU's 4 nm process node from TSMC and the GPU's 4 nm process node indicate modern manufacturing efficiency.

The platform's production status is active for both components, suggesting ongoing availability. The CPU's release date of January 2026 and the GPU's release date of January 2024 indicate that this pairing combines a current-generation processor with a previous-generation graphics solution. The memory bus of quad-channel LPDDR5X provides substantial bandwidth for integrated graphics, though the Radeon 740M's system-shared memory architecture means performance depends heavily on the system's RAM configuration.

FAQ

Q: What is the CPU's performance percentile compared to all processors?

A: The AMD Ryzen AI Max+ 392 ranks in the 96th percentile of all CPUs, with an average benchmark score of 90541. It is 0.2% behind the Intel Xeon 654 and 0.7% behind the AMD Ryzen 9 9955HX, while leading the Intel Xeon w7-2575X by 2.7%.

Q: How does the Radeon 740M compare to other GPUs in its class?

A: The Radeon 740M sits in the 53rd percentile of all GPUs with an average benchmark score of 12870. It is nearly identical to the AMD FirePro W5100 (0.2% behind), AMD Radeon Pro 455 (0.3% behind), and NVIDIA GeForce GTX 590 (0.3% behind), while trailing the AMD Radeon RX 580 by 0.4%.

Q: What memory technology and bandwidth does this platform support?

A: The CPU supports LPDDR5X memory in a quad-channel configuration, providing 256.0 GB/s of memory bandwidth. The system supports ECC memory for enhanced data reliability.

Q: What is the combined performance percentile for this CPU+GPU pairing?

A: The combined percentile for the AMD Ryzen AI Max+ 392 and AMD Radeon 740M configuration is 75, reflecting the significant gap between the CPU's 96th percentile ranking and the GPU's 53rd percentile ranking.

Q: What are the CPU's core and thread counts?

A: The AMD Ryzen AI Max+ 392 features 12 cores and 24 threads, based on the Zen 5 architecture with the Strix Halo codename. It has a base clock of 3.20 GHz and a boost clock of 5.00 GHz.

Q: Does the GPU support hardware ray tracing?

A: Yes, the Radeon 740M includes 4 RT cores, though its overall performance is limited by its 256 shading units and 2.867 TFLOPS FP32 throughput.

Q: What is the power consumption of each component?

A: The CPU has a TDP of 55 W, while the GPU has a TDP of 45 W. Both components are manufactured on a 4 nm process node by TSMC.

Balance and Bottleneck

The performance asymmetry between the CPU and GPU creates a clear bottleneck scenario. The CPU's 96th percentile ranking versus the GPU's 53rd percentile ranking indicates that the graphics solution will limit overall system performance in graphics-intensive workloads. The average benchmark scores—90541 for CPU versus 12870 for GPU—demonstrate a seven-fold difference in raw performance, suggesting that the GPU is the primary constraint in gaming and GPU-accelerated applications.

In CPU-bound workloads such as software compilation, data compression, and scientific computing, the Ryzen AI Max+ 392 operates without significant bottlenecks. The Passmark multithread score of 45231 and integer math score of 152414 indicate that the CPU can handle demanding computational tasks efficiently. However, in gaming scenarios, the GPU's 2.867 TFLOPS FP32 throughput and 8 ROPs create a hard ceiling that prevents the CPU from being fully utilized.

The FPS scaling evidence, while estimated rather than measured, suggests that the GPU will bottleneck at higher resolutions. The pixel rate of 22.40 GPixel/s and texture rate of 44.80 GTexel/s limit fill-rate performance, causing frame rates to drop disproportionately as resolution increases. The CPU's strong single-thread score of 3927 ensures that frame pacing remains consistent, but the GPU's limitations will prevent high frame rates even at 1080p.

The memory architecture partially mitigates the GPU bottleneck. The 256.0 GB/s memory bandwidth and quad-channel LPDDR5X support provide the integrated GPU with substantial bandwidth, though the system-shared memory design means that GPU performance depends on system RAM configuration. The CPU's 64 MB shared L3 cache helps reduce memory latency for both CPU and GPU operations.

Build Overview

This configuration pairs the AMD Ryzen AI Max+ 392 processor with the AMD Radeon 740M integrated GPU in a laptop form factor. The combined percentile of 75 reflects the overall system tier, positioning it above average systems but below high-performance gaming laptops due to the GPU's limitations. The CPU is the defining component of this build, with its 96th percentile ranking placing it among the top processors available.

The system's class is laptop, indicating that the components are designed for mobile use with power efficiency in mind. The CPU's 55 W TDP and GPU's 45 W TDP suggest a total system power draw that is manageable for laptop cooling solutions. The 4 nm process nodes for both components contribute to thermal efficiency and battery life.

This build represents a CPU-first design philosophy, where processing power takes precedence over graphics capability. The 12-core Zen 5 processor with 24 threads provides workstation-level performance, while the Radeon 740M offers basic graphics functionality suitable for productivity and light gaming. The overall tier from the percentiles indicates a system that excels in computational tasks but falls short in graphics-intensive applications.

CPU Analysis

The AMD Ryzen AI Max+ 392 is a 12-core, 24-thread processor based on the Zen 5 architecture with the Strix Halo codename. It operates on the AMD Socket FP11 platform with a base clock of 3.20 GHz and a boost clock of 5.00 GHz. The CPU is manufactured on a 4 nm process node by TSMC, with a die size of 2x 70.6 mm². The cache hierarchy includes 80 KB L1 per core, 1 MB L2 per core, and 64 MB shared L3 cache.

The benchmark scores reveal a well-rounded performance profile. The Passmark single-thread score of 3927 indicates strong per-core performance, essential for lightly-threaded applications and responsive system behavior. The multithread score of 45231 demonstrates excellent scaling across the 24 threads, making this processor suitable for heavily parallel workloads. The floating point math score of 99548 and extended instructions score of 45666 indicate strong computational throughput for scientific and engineering applications.

The 96th percentile CPU ranking places this processor above the AMD Ryzen 9 9955HX by 0.7% and the Intel Xeon w7-2575X by 2.7%, while trailing the Intel Xeon 654 by only 0.2%. This positioning suggests that the Ryzen AI Max+ 392 competes with enterprise-grade server processors despite its mobile form factor. The data compression score of 554760 and random string sorting score of 59487 indicate excellent performance for data-intensive workloads.

The memory support for LPDDR5X in a quad-channel configuration with 256.0 GB/s bandwidth provides substantial memory throughput for both CPU and GPU operations. The ECC memory support adds reliability for professional applications. The PCIe Gen 4 support with 16 lanes from the CPU provides adequate connectivity for high-speed storage and expansion devices.

GPU Analysis

The AMD Radeon 740M is an integrated GPU based on the RDNA 3.0 architecture with the Phoenix2 chip. It is manufactured on a 4 nm process node by TSMC with 20,900 million transistors and a die size of 137 mm². The GPU operates with a base clock of 800 MHz and a boost clock of 2800 MHz, with system-shared memory providing variable bandwidth depending on the host system's RAM configuration.

The GPU's specifications include 256 shading units, 16 TMUs, 8 ROPs, and 4 RT cores. The pixel rate is 22.40 GPixel/s and the texture rate is 44.80 GTexel/s. The FP32 throughput is 2.867 TFLOPS with FP16 performance matching at 2.867 TFLOPS (1:1 ratio). The GPU supports DirectX 12 Ultimate (12_2), OpenGL 4.6, and Vulkan 1.4 APIs.

The benchmark scores place this GPU in the 53rd percentile of all GPUs, with a Geekbench OpenCL score of 10172 and Vulkan score of 15568. The average benchmark score of 12870 is nearly identical to the AMD FirePro W5100 (0.2% difference) and AMD Radeon Pro 455 (0.3% difference). This performance level is suitable for basic graphics tasks, 2D applications, and light gaming at reduced settings.

The 45 W TDP and IGP slot width indicate that this GPU is designed for efficiency rather than raw performance. The PCIe 4.0 x8 bus interface provides adequate bandwidth for the GPU's performance class. The system-shared memory architecture means that GPU performance is dependent on the host system's memory configuration, with the CPU's 256.0 GB/s memory bandwidth serving as the theoretical maximum for GPU memory access. The 4 RT cores provide minimal ray tracing capability, while the 256 shading units limit compute performance in GPU-accelerated applications.

Rate My PC: AMD Ryzen AI Max+ 392 + AMD Radeon 740M

Apex Performer

System Balance Analysis

AMD Ryzen AI Max+ 392

AMD Radeon 740M

Market Position

Game Performance Benchmarks

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

Performance Insights

Optimal Performance

4K Gaming Ready

Performance Tiers Explained

Ultimate

High-End

Mid-Range

Entry Level

Legacy

Usage Scenarios

Benchmark Performance

Gaming Performance

Who Should Build It

Upgrade Path and Platform

FAQ

Balance and Bottleneck

Build Overview

CPU Analysis

GPU Analysis

4K Gaming Performance

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

1440p Gaming Performance

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

1080p Gaming Performance

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

Related Processors

Related Graphics Cards

Compare Your CPU

Compare Your GPU

Related PC Builds

Same CPU with Different GPUs

Same GPU with Different CPUs

Other Popular Builds