SYSTEM ANALYZER

Rate My PC: AMD Ryzen AI Max 390 + NVIDIA Quadro RTX 3000 Mobile Refresh

Get a comprehensive performance analysis of your gaming rig with detailed benchmarks, bottleneck detection, and upgrade recommendations

Build Configuration

Select your components

PROCESSOR (CPU)

▼

GRAPHICS CARD (GPU)

▼

85 Score

Top 15% Ranking

85 / 100

HIGH-END

Power Build

Top 15% of systems. Excellent for 1440p Ultra or 4K High gaming.

1440p Ultra4K High

System Balance Analysis

CPU vs GPU performance ratio

GPU Bottleneck

CPU

95%

GPU

74%

Your GPU is limiting system performance. Consider upgrading to a more powerful graphics card to better utilize your CPU.

PROCESSOR

AMD Ryzen AI Max 390

56,273 Benchmark Score

Top 5% Market Ranking

View Full Specs →

GRAPHICS CARD

NVIDIA Quadro RTX 3000 Mobile Refresh

0 Benchmark Score

Top 26% Market Ranking

View Full Specs →

Market Position

How your build compares to others

Budget

0-30

Mid-Range

30-60

High-End

60-85

Enthusiast

85-100

Your Build

Game Performance Benchmarks

Real-world 4K FPS in popular titles

View All Games →

Performance Insights

Tips to maximize your system

Strong Performance

Excellent for 1440p gaming. Most games will run at high/ultra settings smoothly.

Bottleneck Detected

GPU Bottleneck - Upgrading the weaker component will improve overall performance.

Compatible Games See what you can play Compare CPUs Find upgrades Compare GPUs Find upgrades

Performance Tiers Explained

90-100

Ultimate

4K Ultra gaming, VR ready, ray tracing enabled, professional workloads

4K 60+ FPS VR Ready

70-89

High-End

1440p Ultra or 4K High settings, excellent for modern AAA titles

1440p Ultra 4K High

50-69

Mid-Range

1080p Ultra or 1440p Medium, great value for most gamers

1080p Ultra 1440p Med

30-49

Entry Level

1080p Medium settings, suitable for eSports and older titles

1080p Med eSports

0-29

Legacy

Basic gaming, older titles, consider upgrading for modern games

720p-1080p Low Older Games

This pairing combines the AMD Ryzen AI Max 390, a 12-core Zen 5 mobile processor, with the NVIDIA Quadro RTX 3000 Mobile Refresh, a Turing-based professional mobile GPU. The data shows this is a laptop-class build with a combined percentile of 71, placing it above most systems in the benchmark database, though it is important to note that no measured FPS rows exist for this exact combination. The FACT PACK contains no measuredFps data, so all frame rate discussions below are estimates derived from the CPU and GPU benchmark scores, not direct measurements.

Gaming Performance — measured FPS by game and resolution

The FACT PACK contains no measured FPS data for this CPU+GPU combination, so all gaming performance figures are estimates based on benchmark scores rather than direct frame rate measurements. The CPU’s Cinebench R23 multi-core score of 36064 and single-core score of 5091 indicate strong processing headroom, while the GPU’s FP32 throughput of 5.299 TFLOPS and pixel rate of 88.32 GPixel/s suggest capable 1080p rendering. The GPU sits at the 50th percentile among all GPUs, meaning half of all tracked graphics processors outperform it, which places it as a mid-range mobile part for gaming.

At 1080p with ultra settings, the estimated FPS would be moderate for contemporary titles, likely playable but not high-refresh territory for demanding games. The GPU’s 6 GB of GDDR6 memory on a 192-bit bus with 336.0 GB/s bandwidth provides adequate capacity for 1080p textures, though 1440p ultra settings would strain the memory capacity in newer titles. The CPU’s PassMark single-thread score of 4028 and multi-thread score of 41737 suggest that frame pacing would be stable, as the processor is unlikely to bottleneck the GPU in most gaming workloads. For esports titles with lower graphical demands, the combination could deliver higher frame rates, but the GPU’s 50th percentile standing means 144Hz gaming would only be feasible with reduced settings or older games.

The RTX 3000 Mobile Refresh supports DirectX 12 Ultimate (12_2), OpenGL 4.6, and Vulkan 1.4, so modern rendering features are available, but the 30 RT cores and 240 tensor cores are from the Turing architecture, which is one generation older than the Ampere parts that followed. Ray tracing performance would be modest, and DLSS support exists through the tensor cores, though the 6 GB memory limit may constrain higher resolutions with upscaling enabled. Overall, this is a 1080p gaming platform with medium-to-high settings as the realistic expectation, not a high-refresh or high-resolution gaming machine.

Upgrade Path and Platform

The AMD Ryzen AI Max 390 uses the AMD Socket FP11, which is a mobile-specific socket, meaning the CPU is soldered and not field-upgradeable in most laptop designs. The platform supports LPDDR5X memory in a quad-channel configuration with a memory bandwidth of 256.0 GB/s, and ECC memory is supported, which is unusual for a mobile platform and beneficial for workstation reliability. The CPU provides PCIe Gen 4 with 16 lanes for external devices, though in a laptop this typically routes to the GPU and NVMe storage.

The GPU is an MXM Module with a 80 W TDP and no power connectors, indicating it draws power solely from the motherboard slot. The GPU connects via PCIe 3.0 x16, which is a generation older than the CPU’s PCIe Gen 4 support, so the GPU interface is a potential bandwidth bottleneck for data-heavy workloads, though for gaming the difference is minor. The GPU is marked as End-of-life in production status, with its successor being Ampere-MW, so upgrades would require replacing the entire MXM module with a newer part, assuming the laptop chassis supports it. The CPU’s TDP is 55 W, and the GPU’s TDP is 80 W, for a combined 135 W, which means a laptop power supply must handle this draw plus other components, though the FACT PACK does not specify a suggested PSU wattage.

A sensible next upgrade would be swapping the MXM GPU for a newer module, but the PCIe 3.0 interface and 80 W power envelope limit options to similarly low-power professional parts. The CPU itself is from the Ryzen AI Max generation released in 2025, so it is current, and the platform’s quad-channel LPDDR5X with ECC is a forward-looking feature. The socket FP11 has no known upgrade path beyond the Strix Halo family, so users should plan for a full system replacement rather than incremental CPU upgrades.

Balance and Bottleneck

The data indicates an asymmetric pairing: the CPU is at the 91st percentile among all CPUs, while the GPU is at the 50th percentile among all GPUs. This means the processor vastly outperforms the graphics card in relative standing, creating a CPU-heavy balance where the GPU is the primary limiter in graphics-bound workloads. In gaming, the RTX 3000 Mobile Refresh would be the bottleneck at 1080p ultra, as its 5.299 TFLOPS FP32 throughput is modest by current standards, while the CPU’s Cinebench R23 multi-core score of 36064 suggests it could feed a much faster GPU without breaking a sweat.

For CPU-bound tasks like data compression (PassMark score of 487145), encryption (25097), and integer math (146519), the Ryzen AI Max 390 excels, making the CPU the dominant component in productivity and compute workloads. The GPU’s FP16 performance of 10.60 TFLOPS (2:1) is roughly double its FP32 rate, indicating some compute capability, but the 6 GB memory capacity and 192-bit bus limit large dataset processing. The CPU’s L3 cache of 64 MB shared across 12 cores is substantial and helps in workloads that fit within cache, but the GPU’s 336.0 GB/s bandwidth is lower than the CPU’s 256.0 GB/s system bandwidth, though they serve different purposes.

The FPS scaling evidence, while estimated, suggests that lowering graphical settings would not meaningfully improve frame rates because the CPU has ample headroom; the GPU is the constraining factor. Conversely, in multi-threaded rendering or compilation tasks, the CPU would be the limiting component only if the GPU is idle, but in mixed workloads the GPU’s lower percentile creates an uneven experience. The overall combined percentile of 71 reflects this imbalance, where the strong CPU pulls the system up but the mid-tier GPU prevents it from reaching higher tiers.

Who Should Build It

This system targets users who need strong multi-core CPU performance for professional workloads but only moderate GPU acceleration. Content creators working with video editing or 3D rendering would benefit from the CPU’s Cinebench R23 multi-core score of 36064, which is 0.5% ahead of the Intel Core i9-14900HX and 0.6% ahead of the Intel Core 7 253PQE in average benchmark score. Software developers compiling large codebases would see strong performance from the PassMark integer math score of 146519 and the multithread score of 41737, which outpaces the Ryzen AI 9 HX PRO 470 by 0.1% in average score.

Students and small business workstations would find the ECC memory support and quad-channel LPDDR5X beneficial for stability and multitasking, while the GPU’s 6 GB memory is sufficient for office applications and light CAD work. Gamers at 1080p with medium settings are the target audience, as the GPU’s 50th percentile ranking means high-refresh 1080p is not realistic for demanding titles. The system is not suited for 1440p or 4K gaming, nor for AI training or heavy rendering, where the GPU’s 6 GB capacity and Turing architecture would be limiting. The CPU’s 91st percentile makes this a poor choice for GPU-bound tasks but an excellent choice for CPU-bound workloads like data analysis, virtualization, or scientific computing.

CPU Analysis

The AMD Ryzen AI Max 390 features 12 cores and 24 threads based on the Zen 5 architecture, codenamed Strix Halo, manufactured on TSMC’s 4 nm process. The base clock is 3.20 GHz with a boost clock of 5.00 GHz, and the TDP is 55 W, which is modest for a 12-core part and indicates efficient power management. The cache hierarchy includes 80 KB of L1 per core, 1 MB of L2 per core, and 64 MB of shared L3 cache, which is large and helps with multi-threaded workloads that reuse data.

The Cinebench R15 multi-core score of 3635 and single-core score of 513 show a strong balance, with the R23 multi-core score of 36064 being particularly impressive for a 55 W mobile processor. The PassMark single-thread score of 4028 places it in the upper echelon for single-threaded tasks, while the multithread score of 41737 confirms its multi-core prowess. The data compression score of 487145 and encryption score of 25097 highlight strong integer and cryptographic performance, which is valuable for file archiving and secure communications.

The CPU’s average benchmark score of 56273 is nearly identical to the AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX PRO 470 at 56306 (delta of -0.1%), essentially a tie, and 0.5% ahead of the Intel Core i9-14900HX. This places the Ryzen AI Max 390 in the same performance class as high-end desktop and mobile parts, despite its 55 W TDP, thanks to the efficient Zen 5 architecture on a 4 nm node. The integrated Radeon 8050S graphics provide a fallback for display output, but the discrete GPU handles rendering tasks. The CPU is not multiplier unlocked, so overclocking is off the table, but the boost clock of 5.00 GHz is already high for a mobile part.

FAQ

Q: What is the CPU’s percentile ranking among all CPUs?

A: The AMD Ryzen AI Max 390 is at the 91st percentile among all CPUs, indicating it outperforms 91% of tracked processors.

Q: How does the CPU compare to its nearest rival, the AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX PRO 470?

A: The Ryzen AI Max 390 has an average benchmark score of 56273, which is 0.1% lower than the Ryzen AI 9 HX PRO 470’s score of 56306, making them effectively equal in performance.

Q: What is the GPU’s memory configuration?

A: The NVIDIA Quadro RTX 3000 Mobile Refresh has 6 GB of GDDR6 memory on a 192-bit bus, providing 336.0 GB/s of memory bandwidth.

Q: Does the CPU support ECC memory?

A: Yes, the Ryzen AI Max 390 supports ECC memory, which is unusual for a mobile platform and beneficial for error-sensitive workstation tasks.

Q: What is the GPU’s production status?

A: The GPU is marked as End-of-life, with its successor being Ampere-MW, meaning it is no longer in active production.

Q: What is the combined percentile for this CPU+GPU pairing?

A: The combined percentile is 71, placing this laptop build above 71% of all tracked systems in the database.

Q: What PCIe interface does the GPU use?

A: The GPU uses PCIe 3.0 x16, while the CPU supports PCIe Gen 4 with 16 lanes, creating a generation mismatch between the two components.

Usage Scenarios

For high-refresh gaming, this system falls short. The GPU’s 50th percentile ranking and 5.299 TFLOPS FP32 throughput mean that achieving 144Hz in modern titles at 1080p is unlikely, and the 6 GB memory capacity limits texture quality. The CPU’s single-thread score of 4028 ensures consistent frame times, but the GPU is the ceiling.

Streaming benefits from the CPU’s strong multi-threading, with the R23 multi-core score of 36064 allowing simultaneous game encoding and gameplay without significant CPU strain. The 12 cores and 24 threads handle encoding workloads well, while the GPU’s tensor cores could assist with AI-based encoding, though this is not explicitly measured.

Video editing is a strong suit. The CPU’s PassMark floating-point math score of 90594 and integer math score of 146519 accelerate rendering and effects, while the GPU’s 30 RT cores and 240 tensor cores assist with GPU-accelerated effects in compatible software. The 6 GB VRAM is adequate for 1080p editing timelines but may struggle with 4K multi-layer projects.

3D rendering in applications like Blender or Maya would be CPU-bound, with the R23 multi-core score of 36064 providing strong performance for viewport and final renders. The GPU’s FP32 performance is modest, so GPU-based render engines would be slower than CPU rendering for this part.

Software development benefits from the CPU’s compilation speed, with the PassMark multithread score of 41737 and data compression score of 487145 accelerating build times and package management. The ECC memory support adds reliability for long-running test suites, and the quad-channel bandwidth of 256.0 GB/s aids in large data manipulation.

Student and office work is over-served by this hardware, as the CPU’s 91st percentile ensures snappy responsiveness in productivity suites, while the GPU’s modest performance is irrelevant for document editing or web browsing. The 55 W CPU TDP means battery life would be reasonable for a laptop, though the 80 W GPU adds drain under load.

Build Overview

This is a laptop-class build combining the AMD Ryzen AI Max 390, a 12-core Zen 5 mobile processor from the Strix Halo family, with the NVIDIA Quadro RTX 3000 Mobile Refresh, a Turing-based professional mobile GPU. The CPU is from the 2025 Ryzen AI Max generation, while the GPU dates from 2019 and is end-of-life, creating a generational gap between the two components. The overall tier, based on the combined percentile of 71, places this system in the upper-mid range of the database, driven almost entirely by the CPU’s 91st percentile performance.

The CPU’s average benchmark score of 56273 rivals high-end desktop parts, but the GPU’s 50th percentile and empty benchmark list (avgBenchmarkScore of 0) mean the graphics side is unproven in the tracking data. The build class is laptop, with the GPU using an MXM Module form factor and no power connectors, drawing 80 W from the slot. The CPU’s 55 W TDP and GPU’s 80 W TDP combine for 135 W of core power, which is typical for a mobile workstation. This pairing is best described as a CPU-first workstation with a secondary GPU, suitable for compute-heavy tasks rather than graphics-intensive applications.

Benchmark Performance

The CPU’s benchmark scores are extensive and consistently strong. In Cinebench R15, it scores 3635 multi-core and 513 single-core; in R20, 15146 multi-core and 2138 single-core; and in R23, 36064 multi-core and 5091 single-core. These scores place the CPU at the 91st percentile among all CPUs, with an average benchmark score of 56273. The nearest rivals are the AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX PRO 470 at 56306 (delta -0.1%), the Intel Core i9-14900HX at 56004 (delta 0.5%), the AMD Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3955WX at 56555 (delta -0.5%), and the Intel Core 7 253PQE at 55919 (delta 0.6%). This shows the Ryzen AI Max 390 is within 0.6% of all four rivals, making it statistically tied with each.

The GPU has no benchmark scores in the FACT PACK, with an avgBenchmarkScore of 0 and no nearest rivals listed. Its percentileVsAllGpus is 50, meaning it sits exactly at the median of all tracked GPUs. The GPU’s specifications include a base clock of 945 MHz and boost clock of 1380 MHz, with 1920 shading units, 120 TMUs, and 64 ROPs. The FP32 performance of 5.299 TFLOPS and pixel rate of 88.32 GPixel/s are modest for a 2025 context but were competent for a 2019 professional mobile part. The combined picture is a system where the CPU provides top-tier compute performance, while the GPU offers mid-range graphics capability, resulting in a combined percentile of 71 that reflects the CPU’s dominance in the overall score.

Rate My PC: AMD Ryzen AI Max 390 + NVIDIA Quadro RTX 3000 Mobile Refresh

Power Build

System Balance Analysis

AMD Ryzen AI Max 390

NVIDIA Quadro RTX 3000 Mobile Refresh

Market Position

Game Performance Benchmarks

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

Performance Insights

Strong Performance

Bottleneck Detected

Performance Tiers Explained

Ultimate

High-End

Mid-Range

Entry Level

Legacy

Gaming Performance — measured FPS by game and resolution

Upgrade Path and Platform

Balance and Bottleneck

Who Should Build It

CPU Analysis

FAQ

Usage Scenarios

Build Overview

Benchmark Performance

4K Gaming Performance

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

1440p Gaming Performance

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

1080p Gaming Performance

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

Related Processors

Related Graphics Cards

Compare Your CPU

Compare Your GPU

Related PC Builds

Same CPU with Different GPUs

Same GPU with Different CPUs

Other Popular Builds