SYSTEM ANALYZER

Rate My PC: AMD Ryzen AI Max 390 + NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Mobile

Get a comprehensive performance analysis of your gaming rig with detailed benchmarks, bottleneck detection, and upgrade recommendations

Build Configuration

Select your components

PROCESSOR (CPU)

▼

GRAPHICS CARD (GPU)

▼

93 Score

Top 7% Ranking

93 / 100

ULTIMATE READY

Apex Performer

Top 7% of systems. Capable of 4K Ultra gaming and advanced rendering.

4K 60+ FPSVR ReadyRay Tracing

System Balance Analysis

CPU vs GPU performance ratio

Well Balanced

CPU

95%

GPU

92%

PROCESSOR

AMD Ryzen AI Max 390

56,273 Benchmark Score

Top 5% Market Ranking

View Full Specs →

GRAPHICS CARD

NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Mobile

22,729 Benchmark Score

Top 8% Market Ranking

View Full Specs →

Market Position

How your build compares to others

Budget

0-30

Mid-Range

30-60

High-End

60-85

Enthusiast

85-100

Your Build

Game Performance Benchmarks

Real-world 4K FPS in popular titles

View All Games →

Performance Insights

Tips to maximize your system

Optimal Performance

Your system is in the top tier. You can run any modern game at maximum settings.

4K Gaming Ready

Consider a 4K 144Hz monitor to fully utilize your hardware capabilities.

Compatible Games See what you can play Compare CPUs Find upgrades Compare GPUs Find upgrades

Performance Tiers Explained

90-100

Ultimate

4K Ultra gaming, VR ready, ray tracing enabled, professional workloads

4K 60+ FPS VR Ready

70-89

High-End

1440p Ultra or 4K High settings, excellent for modern AAA titles

1440p Ultra 4K High

50-69

Mid-Range

1080p Ultra or 1440p Medium, great value for most gamers

1080p Ultra 1440p Med

30-49

Entry Level

1080p Medium settings, suitable for eSports and older titles

1080p Med eSports

0-29

Legacy

Basic gaming, older titles, consider upgrading for modern games

720p-1080p Low Older Games

# AMD Ryzen AI Max 390 + NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Mobile

This laptop pairing combines a 12-core Zen 5 processor with a mainstream Ada Lovelace GPU, landing at the 79th percentile overall. The CPU is the standout component, sitting at the 91st percentile among all processors, while the GPU trails at the 67th percentile. This creates a system where processor-heavy workloads clearly outpace graphics-bound tasks, making it a logical choice for compute-focused users who still need competent 1080p gaming.

Upgrade Path and Platform

The AMD Ryzen AI Max 390 uses the AMD Socket FP11, a mobile-only platform that ties the processor directly to the motherboard. This means the CPU is not field-upgradeable in any conventional sense; the platform is designed for the life of the laptop, not for swapping components later. The 55 W TDP indicates a power-efficient design that fits within thin-and-light chassis, but it also limits sustained performance compared to higher-wattage mobile parts.

Memory support is LPDDR5X over a quad-channel interface, delivering 256.0 GB/s of bandwidth. This is a notable advantage for integrated-graphics scenarios and memory-sensitive workloads, though the discrete RTX 4060 Mobile has its own 8 GB GDDR6 allocation. The CPU also supports ECC memory, which is uncommon in mobile platforms and relevant for users running long computation jobs where data integrity matters.

PCIe connectivity is Gen 4 with 16 lanes from the CPU, while the GPU uses a PCIe 4.0 x8 interface. This is sufficient bandwidth for the RTX 4060 Mobile; the x8 link does not meaningfully constrain a GPU of this class. The system's power delivery is straightforward: the CPU draws 55 W and the GPU has a 115 W TDP, so a combined thermal design of roughly 170 W for the two primary components. The GPU has no power connectors listed, meaning it is soldered and powered through the board, typical for mobile implementations.

A sensible next upgrade for this platform is not a CPU or GPU swap, since both are soldered. Instead, users should focus on what the platform allows: expanding storage via Gen 4 NVMe drives, increasing system memory if the laptop supports it, or investing in an external GPU enclosure if the laptop has Thunderbolt or USB4 connectivity. Given the CPU's strength, the most impactful upgrade would be addressing GPU limitations through external means, though this depends on the specific laptop's I/O capabilities.

Usage Scenarios

High-refresh gaming: The RTX 4060 Mobile, with a PassMark G3D score of 17469 and a 67th percentile rank, is positioned for 1080p gaming at high settings rather than 1440p or 4K. The CPU's 91st percentile performance ensures it will not bottleneck the GPU in most titles. The combination is estimated to deliver smooth frame rates at 1080p, though no measured FPS data exists for this exact pairing. The GPU's 8 GB VRAM is adequate for current titles at this resolution, but future games with higher VRAM demands may require settings reductions.

Streaming: The CPU's 24 threads and strong multi-core scores, including a Cinebench R23 multi-core result of 36064, provide ample headroom for encoding while gaming. The GPU's NVENC encoder, part of the Ada Lovelace architecture, offloads video encoding from the CPU. This pairing can handle a single-PC streaming setup at 1080p without significant frame drops, as the CPU has enough spare threads for both game logic and streaming overhead.

Video editing: Multi-core performance is excellent, with Cinebench R20 multi-core at 15146 and PassMark multi-thread at 41737. These scores indicate strong rendering times in export workloads. The GPU's 11.61 TFLOPS FP32 performance accelerates effects and timeline previews, though the 8 GB VRAM may limit work with very large 4K timelines. The CPU's 256.0 GB/s memory bandwidth helps with large media files, and the quad-channel LPDDR5X support is a genuine advantage for video editing.

3D rendering: The CPU is the clear workhorse here, with Cinebench R15 multi-core at 3635 and R23 multi-core at 36064. These numbers place it among high-end desktop parts from a generation ago, despite being a 55 W mobile chip. The GPU's 24 RT cores and 96 tensor cores support ray-traced rendering in applications like Blender or V-Ray, but the 11.61 TFLOPS FP32 throughput means the GPU is a secondary render device compared to the CPU. Users doing CPU-based rendering will find this system highly capable; GPU-based rendering will be slower but functional.

Software development: Compilation and testing workloads benefit from the 12 cores and 24 threads, with PassMark integer math at 146519 and data compression at 487145. These scores indicate fast code builds and efficient handling of large codebases. The 64 MB shared L3 cache reduces latency for frequently accessed data, which helps in iterative development cycles. The ECC memory support is a plus for developers running long test suites where memory errors could corrupt results.

Student and office work: This is overkill for typical productivity tasks, but the single-thread performance is strong enough for responsive application use. Cinebench R23 single-core at 5091 and PassMark single-thread at 4028 place it well above average. The integrated Radeon 8050S GPU provides a fallback for display output when the discrete GPU is not needed, saving power on battery. The 55 W CPU TDP suggests reasonable battery life for a high-performance laptop, though the discrete GPU will draw power when active.

CPU Analysis

The AMD Ryzen AI Max 390 is built on Zen 5 architecture using TSMC's 4 nm process, with a die size of 2x 70.6 mm². It features 12 cores and 24 threads, operating at a base clock of 3.20 GHz and a boost clock of 5.00 GHz. The cache hierarchy includes 80 KB L1 per core, 1 MB L2 per core, and a shared 64 MB L3 cache. This large L3 is a significant factor in the CPU's strong benchmark performance, as it reduces memory latency for frequently accessed data.

The CPU's average benchmark score is 56273, placing it at the 91st percentile among all CPUs. Its nearest rival, the AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX PRO 470, scores 56306, a mere 0.1% difference, meaning these two processors are effectively tied in performance. The Intel Core i9-14900HX scores 56004, putting the Ryzen AI Max 390 0.5% ahead. The AMD Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3955WX scores 56555, which is 0.5% higher, and the Intel Core 7 253PQE scores 55919, 0.6% lower. These deltas are all within noise, indicating that the Ryzen AI Max 390 sits in a tightly contested performance tier.

In multi-core workloads, the Cinebench R23 score of 36064 is particularly strong for a 55 W mobile chip. This result suggests sustained performance that competes with much higher-power desktop parts. The PassMark multi-thread score of 41737 reinforces this picture, as does the floating-point math score of 90594, which indicates strong number-crunching capability. The data compression score of 487145 is exceptional and points to excellent performance in archiving and file management tasks.

Single-thread performance is equally solid, with Cinebench R23 single-core at 5091 and PassMark single-thread at 4028. These scores place it near the top of mobile processors and comfortably ahead of older desktop parts. The boost clock of 5.00 GHz is high for a mobile chip, and the Zen 5 architecture's IPC improvements over previous generations are evident in these results.

The 4 nm process node from TSMC is the same generation used in many high-end desktop and mobile parts, contributing to the CPU's efficiency. The 55 W TDP is modest, allowing for thinner laptops without excessive cooling requirements. However, the boost clock of 5.00 GHz is likely only achievable for short bursts; sustained all-core loads will probably settle at lower clocks due to thermal constraints within the chassis.

Who Should Build It

The target user for this system is a professional who needs serious CPU compute power in a portable form factor. The 91st percentile CPU performance makes it ideal for engineers running simulations, data scientists processing large datasets, and video editors exporting long projects. The PassMark data encryption score of 25097 and extended instructions score of 38716 indicate strong performance in cryptography and specialized instruction workloads, which matters for security researchers and scientific computing.

Gamers at 1080p will find this system suitable, but the 67th percentile GPU means it is not a high-end gaming machine. Users who primarily game should look elsewhere; those who game occasionally but need CPU performance for work will find this a good balance. Content creators rendering on CPU will see excellent results, while those relying on GPU rendering will find the RTX 4060 Mobile acceptable but not outstanding.

Software developers, particularly those working on large codebases or doing cross-platform compilation, will benefit from the 12 cores and high memory bandwidth. The 256.0 GB/s bandwidth is useful for memory-intensive workloads like virtual machine management or database operations. Students in engineering, computer science, or data science fields will find this system overqualified for coursework but ready for research work.

Small business workstations that need to handle financial modeling, data analysis, or moderate rendering will perform well with this configuration. The ECC memory support is a differentiator for reliability-sensitive workloads. The laptop class means it is portable, but the combined 55 W CPU and 115 W GPU TDP suggests a larger chassis with adequate cooling, so this is likely a desktop replacement rather than an ultraportable.

FAQ

Q: What is the CPU's percentile ranking among all processors?

A: The AMD Ryzen AI Max 390 ranks at the 91st percentile among all CPUs, with an average benchmark score of 56273.

Q: How does the GPU compare to its nearest rival?

A: The RTX 4060 Mobile scores 17469 on PassMark G3D and has a 67th percentile ranking. Its nearest rival is the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080, which scores 22895, meaning the RTX 4060 Mobile is 0.7% behind.

Q: What is the memory configuration for this system?

A: The CPU supports LPDDR5X memory over a quad-channel interface with 256.0 GB/s bandwidth, and ECC memory is supported. The GPU has 8 GB of GDDR6 memory on a 128-bit bus with 256.0 GB/s bandwidth.

Q: Does this system have measured FPS data for games?

A: No, the FACT PACK contains no measured FPS data for this exact CPU and GPU combination. All frame rate discussions are estimated from benchmark scores.

Q: What is the CPU's boost clock and architecture?

A: The CPU has a boost clock of 5.00 GHz and uses Zen 5 architecture on TSMC's 4 nm process, with a codename of Strix Halo.

Q: How many RT cores and tensor cores does the GPU have?

A: The GPU has 24 RT cores and 96 tensor cores, part of the Ada Lovelace architecture, with a boost clock of 1890 MHz.

Q: What is the combined percentile ranking of this system?

A: The combined percentile for this CPU and GPU pairing is 79, placing it above the majority of laptop configurations.

GPU Analysis

The NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Mobile is built on the AD107 chip using TSMC's 5 nm process, with 18,900 million transistors on a 159 mm² die. The GPU has a base clock of 1545 MHz and a boost clock of 1890 MHz, with memory running at 2000 MHz or 16 Gbps effective. The 8 GB of GDDR6 memory on a 128-bit bus provides 256.0 GB/s of bandwidth, which is identical to the CPU's system memory bandwidth — an interesting symmetry.

The GPU features 3072 shading units, 96 texture mapping units, and 48 raster output units. It has 24 RT cores and 96 tensor cores, supporting DirectX 12 Ultimate, OpenGL 4.6, and Vulkan 1.4. The pixel rate is 90.72 GPixel/s and the texture rate is 181.4 GTexel/s. FP32 performance is 11.61 TFLOPS, with FP16 at the same rate (1:1), which is unusual and indicates no dedicated FP16 acceleration.

The GPU's average benchmark score is 22729, placing it at the 67th percentile among all GPUs. Its nearest rival is the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080, which scores 22895, a 0.7% advantage. The AMD Radeon RX 7700 XT scores 22549, putting the RTX 4060 Mobile 0.8% ahead. The Intel Arc B580 scores 23021, which is 1.3% higher, and the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5060 Mobile scores 22435, meaning the RTX 4060 Mobile is 1.3% ahead of its direct successor.

In compute workloads, the PassMark GPU compute score of 6816 indicates moderate compute capability, consistent with a mid-range mobile GPU. The Geekbench OpenCL score of 89420 and Vulkan score of 89569 are nearly identical, suggesting balanced performance across APIs. The DirectX 12 PassMark score of 73 is relatively low compared to the DirectX 11 score of 157, which may indicate driver overhead or architectural differences in how the GPU handles newer APIs.

The 115 W TDP is typical for a mid-range mobile GPU, allowing for decent performance in a laptop form factor. The GPU has no power connectors, as it is soldered to the motherboard. The display outputs are portable device dependent, meaning the specific ports vary by laptop model. The GPU uses a PCIe 4.0 x8 interface, which provides sufficient bandwidth for its 8 GB memory pool.

For rendering workloads, the 24 RT cores support hardware-accelerated ray tracing, but the limited VRAM and moderate compute throughput mean it is not a primary rendering device. The tensor cores support DLSS, which can significantly boost frame rates in supported games. The 11.61 TFLOPS FP32 performance is comparable to desktop GPUs from a few generations ago, making this a capable 1080p gaming GPU.

Benchmark Performance

The CPU's benchmark results are consistently strong across all tests. In Cinebench, the R15 multi-core score is 3635, R20 multi-core is 15146, and R23 multi-core is 36064. Single-core scores are 513 for R15, 2138 for R20, and 5091 for R23. These results show excellent scaling from single to multi-core workloads, with the R23 multi-core score being nearly 7 times the single-core score, indicating efficient use of all 12 cores.

PassMark results reinforce the CPU's strengths. The multi-thread score is 41737, with single-thread at 4028. Integer math scores 146519, floating-point math scores 90594, and extended instructions score 38716. Data compression scores 487145, which is exceptionally high, while data encryption scores 25097. Random string sorting scores 53113, and find prime numbers scores 316. Physics scores 2761, which is a modest result for a CPU of this class.

The GPU's benchmark scores are more modest. The PassMark G3D score is 17469, with G2D at 730. DirectX 9 scores 216, DirectX 10 scores 107, DirectX 11 scores 157, and DirectX 12 scores 73. The GPU compute score is 6816. Geekbench OpenCL scores 89420 and Vulkan scores 89569. The DirectX 12 score being lower than DirectX 11 is notable, possibly indicating that the GPU is more efficient in older API workloads.

The combined picture is a system where the CPU outperforms the GPU by a significant margin. The CPU's 91st percentile ranking versus the GPU's 67th percentile means the processor is the dominant component. The combined percentile of 79 reflects this imbalance, placing the overall system in the upper-middle tier. For workloads that are CPU-bound, this system performs like a high-end desktop from a few years ago. For GPU-bound workloads, it performs like a mid-range laptop.

There are no measured FPS data points for this exact CPU and GPU combination. The FACT PACK contains no measuredFps rows, so all frame rate estimates are derived from the benchmark scores. The CPU's strong single-thread performance should prevent bottlenecks in most games, while the GPU's 17469 G3D score suggests it can handle 1080p gaming at high settings in most titles, with some compromises in the most demanding games.

Build Overview

This is a laptop-class build, as indicated by the buildClass field, combining the AMD Ryzen AI Max 390 CPU with the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Mobile GPU. The CPU is a 12-core Zen 5 part with 24 threads, running on the FP11 socket. The GPU is an Ada Lovelace mobile part with 8 GB of GDDR6 memory. The combined percentile is 79, meaning this system outperforms 79% of all tested configurations.

The CPU's 91st percentile ranking places it among the top 10% of all processors, a remarkable position for a mobile chip. The GPU's 67th percentile is more moderate, placing it above average but not in the top tier. This creates a system that is clearly CPU-forward, with the processor capable of handling heavy compute workloads while the GPU handles mainstream gaming and graphics tasks.

The overall tier is upper-middle to high-end, depending on the workload. For CPU-intensive tasks like rendering, compiling, or data analysis, this system performs like a high-end desktop. For GPU-intensive tasks like gaming at high resolutions or GPU rendering, it performs like a mid-range laptop. The system is best suited for users who prioritize compute performance over graphics performance.

The 55 W CPU TDP and 115 W GPU TDP combine for a total of 170 W for the primary components, which is manageable in a larger laptop chassis. The CPU's 4 nm process and the GPU's 5 nm process both contribute to efficiency, though the GPU's 18,900 million transistors on a 159 mm² die indicate a denser design. The system's memory configuration, with 256.0 GB/s bandwidth for both CPU and GPU, is well-matched and avoids obvious bottlenecks in data transfer.

Balance and Bottleneck

The performance imbalance between the CPU and GPU is the defining characteristic of this system. The CPU's 91st percentile versus the GPU's 67th percentile means the processor is the stronger component by a wide margin. In CPU-bound workloads like multi-threaded rendering, data compression, or software compilation, the CPU will be the primary driver of performance, with the GPU playing a minor role.

In GPU-bound workloads like gaming at high resolutions or GPU-accelerated rendering, the GPU will be the limiting factor. The RTX 4060 Mobile's 17469 G3D score and 67th percentile ranking mean it will cap performance in graphics-intensive scenarios. The CPU will have significant headroom in these cases, potentially sitting idle while the GPU is fully utilized. This is not necessarily a problem, as it means the CPU will not bottleneck the GPU, but it does mean the system's overall gaming performance is limited by the GPU.

The memory bandwidth situation is balanced, with both CPU and GPU having 256.0 GB/s. This means neither component has a bandwidth advantage over the other, which is unusual and helps avoid memory-related bottlenecks in mixed workloads. The CPU's quad-channel LPDDR5X support is particularly strong for a mobile chip, providing ample bandwidth for multi-core tasks.

The FPS scaling, estimated from benchmark scores rather than measured data, suggests that in most games the GPU will be the limiting factor at 1080p. The CPU's single-thread performance is strong enough to drive high frame rates, but the GPU's compute throughput will determine the maximum FPS. At lower resolutions or with reduced settings, the CPU might become the bottleneck in lightly-threaded games, but this is unlikely given the CPU's 5091 Cinebench R23 single-core score.

For users who want to maximize gaming performance, the GPU is the component to upgrade, but it is soldered and cannot be replaced. For users who want to maximize compute performance, the CPU is already excellent and can handle demanding workloads without issue. The system is best used as a portable workstation with gaming capability, rather than a gaming machine with workstation features. The bottleneck analysis clearly indicates that this is a CPU-first system, and users should align their expectations accordingly.

Rate My PC: AMD Ryzen AI Max 390 + NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Mobile

Apex Performer

System Balance Analysis

AMD Ryzen AI Max 390

NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Mobile

Market Position

Game Performance Benchmarks

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

Performance Insights

Optimal Performance

4K Gaming Ready

Performance Tiers Explained

Ultimate

High-End

Mid-Range

Entry Level

Legacy

Upgrade Path and Platform

Usage Scenarios

CPU Analysis

Who Should Build It

FAQ

GPU Analysis

Benchmark Performance

Build Overview

Balance and Bottleneck

4K Gaming Performance

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

1440p Gaming Performance

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

1080p Gaming Performance

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

Related Processors

Related Graphics Cards

Compare Your CPU

Compare Your GPU

Related PC Builds

Same CPU with Different GPUs

Same GPU with Different CPUs

Other Popular Builds