SYSTEM ANALYZER

Rate My PC: AMD Ryzen AI Max 390 + NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Mobile

Get a comprehensive performance analysis of your gaming rig with detailed benchmarks, bottleneck detection, and upgrade recommendations

Build Configuration

Select your components

PROCESSOR (CPU)

▼

GRAPHICS CARD (GPU)

▼

93 Score

Top 7% Ranking

93 / 100

ULTIMATE READY

Apex Performer

Top 7% of systems. Capable of 4K Ultra gaming and advanced rendering.

4K 60+ FPSVR ReadyRay Tracing

System Balance Analysis

CPU vs GPU performance ratio

Well Balanced

CPU

95%

GPU

91%

PROCESSOR

AMD Ryzen AI Max 390

56,273 Benchmark Score

Top 5% Market Ranking

View Full Specs →

GRAPHICS CARD

NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Mobile

19,049 Benchmark Score

Top 9% Market Ranking

View Full Specs →

Market Position

How your build compares to others

Budget

0-30

Mid-Range

30-60

High-End

60-85

Enthusiast

85-100

Your Build

Game Performance Benchmarks

Real-world 4K FPS in popular titles

View All Games →

Performance Insights

Tips to maximize your system

Optimal Performance

Your system is in the top tier. You can run any modern game at maximum settings.

4K Gaming Ready

Consider a 4K 144Hz monitor to fully utilize your hardware capabilities.

Compatible Games See what you can play Compare CPUs Find upgrades Compare GPUs Find upgrades

Performance Tiers Explained

90-100

Ultimate

4K Ultra gaming, VR ready, ray tracing enabled, professional workloads

4K 60+ FPS VR Ready

70-89

High-End

1440p Ultra or 4K High settings, excellent for modern AAA titles

1440p Ultra 4K High

50-69

Mid-Range

1080p Ultra or 1440p Medium, great value for most gamers

1080p Ultra 1440p Med

30-49

Entry Level

1080p Medium settings, suitable for eSports and older titles

1080p Med eSports

0-29

Legacy

Basic gaming, older titles, consider upgrading for modern games

720p-1080p Low Older Games

# AMD Ryzen AI Max 390 + NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Mobile

This laptop pairing combines AMD's 12-core Zen 5 Strix Halo processor with NVIDIA's entry-level Ada Lovelace mobile GPU, creating a system that sits at the 77th percentile overall among all CPU+GPU combinations in the database. The CPU is the clear performance leader here, ranking in the 91st percentile among all processors, while the GPU trails at the 63rd percentile among all graphics cards. This creates an interesting asymmetry: the processor is a top-tier mobile part capable of workstation-class throughput, while the graphics solution is more modestly positioned, aimed at 1080p gaming and mainstream creative work rather than high-end rendering. No measured FPS rows exist for this exact combination in the FACT PACK, so all frame rate discussions below are estimated from the benchmark scores rather than direct game testing.

GPU Analysis — VRAM, bandwidth, clocks, RT/tensor hardware, what the benchmark scores mean for rendering

The NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Mobile is built on the Ada Lovelace architecture using TSMC's 5 nm process, with a die size of 159 mm² containing 18,900 million transistors. The GPU operates at a base clock of 1455 MHz and boosts to 1755 MHz, with memory running at 2000 MHz (16 Gbps effective). It comes equipped with 6 GB of GDDR6 memory on a 96-bit bus, delivering 192.0 GB/s of bandwidth. The memory configuration is notably modest — 6 GB at 192 GB/s is sufficient for 1080p gaming but will become a limiting factor at higher resolutions or with texture-heavy workloads.

The compute configuration includes 2560 shading units, 80 texture mapping units, and 48 raster output units. Ray tracing hardware is present with 20 RT cores, and AI acceleration is handled by 80 tensor cores. The GPU's raw throughput figures include 8.986 TFLOPS for both FP32 and FP16 (1:1 ratio), a pixel rate of 84.24 GPixel/s, and a texture rate of 140.4 GTexel/s. These specifications position the RTX 4050 Mobile as a capable entry-level discrete GPU for laptops, with the tensor cores enabling DLSS frame generation and the RT cores providing hardware-accelerated ray tracing.

In benchmark terms, the GPU achieves a Passmark G3D score of 14423, which places it at the 63rd percentile among all GPUs. Its average benchmark score of 19049 puts it in close competition with the AMD Radeon RX 6600 (19036, just 0.1% ahead), the NVIDIA Quadro K6000 (19030, 0.1% ahead), and the NVIDIA RTX 2000 Ada Generation (18954, 0.5% behind). The Passmark DirectX scores show 184 for DX9, 130 for DX11, and 61 for DX12, while the Geekbench OpenCL score is 74748 and Vulkan is 75235. The GPU compute score of 5947 from Passmark indicates modest compute capability relative to its graphics performance.

For rendering workloads, the RTX 4050 Mobile's 20 RT cores and 80 tensor cores provide hardware acceleration for ray-traced scenes and AI denoising, but the 6 GB VRAM and 192 GB/s bandwidth will constrain complex 3D scenes. The 8.986 TFLOPS FP32 performance is adequate for real-time viewport rendering but not for heavy offline rendering tasks. The GPU's 50 W TDP and "IGP" slot width indicate it is designed for thinner laptops where power efficiency matters more than raw throughput.

Gaming Performance — measured FPS by game and resolution from measuredFpsUltraByGame (or, if dataIsMeasured is false, frame expectations qualitatively from the benchmark scores and say the figures are estimates)

The FACT PACK contains no measured FPS data for this CPU+GPU combination — the measuredFpsUltraByGame field is empty, and dataIsMeasured is false. Therefore, all frame rate expectations below are estimates derived from the benchmark scores rather than verified game testing. The GPU's Passmark G3D score of 14423 and its position at the 63rd percentile among all GPUs suggest it is a mainstream 1080p gaming solution. The 6 GB VRAM capacity and 192 GB/s memory bandwidth are the primary constraints for gaming performance.

At 1080p with ultra settings, this GPU should handle esports titles and older games comfortably, with frame rates likely exceeding 60 FPS in most scenarios. For modern AAA games at 1080p ultra, the RTX 4050 Mobile would likely deliver playable but not consistently high frame rates — expect 40-60 FPS in demanding titles, with drops below 40 FPS in the most graphically intensive scenes. The 20 RT cores enable ray tracing, but enabling ray-traced effects will significantly reduce frame rates given the GPU's mid-range positioning.

At 1440p, the GPU would struggle with ultra settings, likely delivering 30-45 FPS in AAA titles and requiring settings reductions to maintain smooth gameplay. The 6 GB VRAM becomes a limiting factor at this resolution, as many modern games exceed 6 GB of VRAM usage at high texture quality. At 4K, the RTX 4050 Mobile is not a viable option for ultra settings — frame rates would likely fall below 30 FPS in most modern titles, and the VRAM limitation would cause texture streaming issues.

The CPU's strong performance — 36064 in Cinebench R23 multi-core and 5091 in single-core — ensures it will not bottleneck the GPU in gaming workloads. The Ryzen AI Max 390's single-thread performance is particularly relevant for game physics and draw call processing. DLSS support via the tensor cores can help mitigate the GPU's raw performance limitations by upscaling from lower internal resolutions, which is especially valuable at 1440p and 4K where native rendering would be too demanding.

Usage Scenarios — grounded in the scores: high-refresh gaming, streaming, video editing, 3D rendering, software development, student and office work

High-refresh gaming: This system is suited for 1080p high-refresh gaming in esports and competitive titles, where the CPU's strong single-core performance (5091 in Cinebench R23 single-core, 4028 in Passmark single-thread) ensures high frame rates. The GPU's 14423 G3D score suggests it can push 144+ FPS in lighter titles but will fall short of that in demanding AAA games, where 60-100 FPS is a more realistic expectation.

Streaming: The CPU's 24 threads and 12 cores provide ample headroom for encoding while gaming, with a Passmark multithread score of 41737 and data compression score of 487145 indicating strong multi-tasking capability. The GPU's NVENC encoder (part of the Ada Lovelace architecture) can offload streaming encoding, though the 6 GB VRAM may limit simultaneous gaming and streaming in VRAM-heavy titles.

Video editing: The combination of CPU multi-core power (36064 in Cinebench R23 multi-core) and GPU acceleration (74748 in Geekbench OpenCL) makes this a capable video editing machine for 1080p and light 4K work. The 6 GB VRAM is sufficient for most editing timelines, but the 256 GB/s CPU memory bandwidth (LPDDR5X quad-channel) is the stronger asset for timeline scrubbing and preview rendering.

3D rendering: The GPU's 8.986 TFLOPS FP32 performance and 20 RT cores provide hardware acceleration for GPU-based renderers, but the 6 GB VRAM is a significant constraint for complex scenes. The CPU's 64 MB L3 cache and 24 threads make it well-suited for CPU-based rendering, where its 91st percentile ranking among all CPUs is a strong indicator of capability.

Software development: The CPU's 12 cores and 24 threads, combined with a Passmark integer math score of 146519 and extended instructions score of 38716, make this an excellent platform for compilation, testing, and running virtual machines. The ECC memory support adds reliability for long-running build processes and data integrity.

Student and office work: The CPU's single-thread score of 5091 in Cinebench R23 and Passmark single-thread score of 4028 ensure snappy responsiveness for productivity applications. The 55 W TDP CPU and 50 W GPU keep power consumption manageable for a laptop, while the integrated Radeon 8050S graphics provide a fallback for battery-saving modes when the discrete GPU is not needed.

Balance and Bottleneck — which component limits which workload, using percentiles and FPS scaling as evidence

The performance asymmetry between the CPU (91st percentile) and GPU (63rd percentile) creates a clear bottleneck structure. In gaming workloads, the GPU is the limiting factor — its 14423 G3D score and 6 GB VRAM will cap frame rates well before the CPU's processing power becomes a constraint. The CPU's 91st percentile ranking means it can feed frames to the GPU faster than the GPU can render them in most scenarios, making the GPU the definitive bottleneck for gaming.

In compute-heavy workloads like 3D rendering, video encoding, and software compilation, the CPU becomes the primary driver of performance. The Ryzen AI Max 390's 36064 Cinebench R23 multi-core score and 41737 Passmark multithread score indicate it can handle demanding parallel workloads, while the GPU's compute score of 5947 in Passmark shows it is not a compute powerhouse. For tasks like machine learning inference or GPU-accelerated rendering, the GPU's 8.986 TFLOPS and 80 tensor cores provide acceleration, but the 6 GB VRAM will limit model sizes and scene complexity.

Memory bandwidth is another consideration: the CPU has access to 256 GB/s via quad-channel LPDDR5X, while the GPU has 192 GB/s via its 96-bit GDDR6 interface. For workloads that move data between CPU and GPU, the PCIe 4.0 x8 interface (GPU bus interface) provides adequate bandwidth, but the CPU's PCIe Gen 4 with 16 lanes offers more headroom for storage and other peripherals.

The 77th combined percentile reflects this imbalance — the system is stronger than its GPU percentile alone would suggest because the CPU compensates in many workloads, but weaker than the CPU percentile implies because the GPU limits gaming and GPU-accelerated tasks. For users prioritizing gaming, the GPU will be the bottleneck; for users prioritizing productivity and development, the system is well-balanced.

Benchmark Performance — exact CPU and GPU scores, percentile positions, and what the combined picture is

The CPU's benchmark suite shows consistent strength across all tests. In Cinebench R15, it scores 3635 multi-core and 513 single-core; in R20, 15146 multi-core and 2138 single-core; in R23, 36064 multi-core and 5091 single-core. Passmark results include 487145 for data compression, 25097 for data encryption, 38716 for extended instructions, 316 for prime numbers, 90594 for floating point math, 146519 for integer math, 41737 for multithread, 2761 for physics, 53113 for random string sorting, and 4028 for single-thread. The average benchmark score is 56273, placing the CPU at the 91st percentile among all CPUs.

The CPU's nearest rivals are closely matched: the AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX PRO 470 scores 56306 (0.1% ahead), the Intel Core i9-14900HX scores 56004 (0.5% behind), the AMD Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3955WX scores 56555 (0.5% ahead), and the Intel Core 7 253PQE scores 55919 (0.6% behind). This places the Ryzen AI Max 390 in the same performance tier as high-end desktop and mobile processors, despite being a 55 W mobile part.

The GPU's benchmark results are more modest: Passmark G3D score of 14423, G2D score of 633, DirectX 9 score of 184, DirectX 11 score of 130, DirectX 12 score of 61, and DirectX 10 score of 79. Geekbench results show 74748 for OpenCL and 75235 for Vulkan. The GPU compute score is 5947. The average benchmark score is 19049, placing the GPU at the 63rd percentile among all GPUs. Its nearest rivals include the AMD Radeon RX 6600 (19036, 0.1% ahead), NVIDIA Quadro K6000 (19030, 0.1% ahead), NVIDIA Tesla K20m (19089, 0.2% behind), and NVIDIA RTX 2000 Ada Generation (18954, 0.5% behind).

The combined picture is a system where the CPU performs like a top-tier desktop processor while the GPU performs like a mid-range desktop card from several generations ago. The 77th combined percentile reflects this: the system is better than average overall, but the GPU holds it back from being a high-end gaming or rendering machine.

Who Should Build It — target users and industries (gamers at specific resolutions, content creators, developers, students, small business workstations) tied strictly to the measured performance

This laptop is best suited for users who need strong CPU performance for productivity and development work, with gaming as a secondary consideration. Gamers targeting 1080p at medium-to-high settings will find the RTX 4050 Mobile adequate, with its 14423 G3D score supporting 60+ FPS in most titles at reduced settings. Those seeking high-refresh 1440p or 4K gaming should look elsewhere, as the 6 GB VRAM and 192 GB/s bandwidth will limit performance at those resolutions.

Content creators working with video editing, photo processing, and light 3D work will benefit from the CPU's 91st percentile performance. The 24 threads and 36064 Cinebench R23 multi-core score accelerate rendering and export times, while the GPU's tensor cores enable AI-accelerated effects in compatible applications. The 6 GB VRAM is workable for 1080p editing timelines but will require proxy workflows for 4K material.

Software developers will find this system well-suited for compilation-heavy workflows, with the CPU's integer math score of 146519 and multithread score of 41737 indicating strong build performance. The 64 MB L3 cache and ECC memory support add reliability for long-running processes. Students in engineering, computer science, or data science programs will appreciate the CPU power for simulations and coding, while the GPU handles visualization tasks adequately.

Small business workstations running office productivity, database, and financial applications will find the CPU's single-thread performance (5091 in Cinebench R23 single-core) more than sufficient, with the integrated Radeon 8050S graphics providing a power-efficient fallback. The 55 W CPU TDP and 50 W GPU TDP keep total power consumption manageable for a mobile workstation.

CPU Analysis — cores, clocks, architecture, what the benchmark scores mean for real workloads

The AMD Ryzen AI Max 390 is a 12-core, 24-thread processor based on the Zen 5 architecture with the Strix Halo codename, manufactured on TSMC's 4 nm process. It has a base clock of 3.20 GHz and a boost clock of 5.00 GHz, with a TDP of 55 W. The cache hierarchy includes 80 KB L1 per core, 1 MB L2 per core, and 64 MB of shared L3 cache. The die size is 2x 70.6 mm², and the CPU supports LPDDR5X memory across a quad-channel interface with 256 GB/s bandwidth. ECC memory is supported, and the CPU integrates Radeon 8050S graphics.

The benchmark scores reveal a processor that excels in both single-threaded and multi-threaded workloads. The Cinebench R23 single-core score of 5091 and multi-core score of 36064 demonstrate strong performance across the board. The Passmark data compression score of 487145 is particularly notable, indicating excellent performance for file archiving and data processing tasks. The floating point math score of 90594 and integer math score of 146519 show robust computational capability for scientific and financial applications.

The CPU's 91st percentile ranking places it among the top processors in the database, rivaling desktop parts like the Threadripper PRO 3955WX (which it trails by only 0.5%) and outperforming the Core i9-14900HX by 0.5%. The 55 W TDP is impressive for this level of performance, suggesting efficient power management in the Zen 5 architecture. The 4 nm process node from TSMC contributes to this efficiency.

For real workloads, the 12 cores and 24 threads handle heavily parallel tasks like video encoding, 3D rendering, and scientific computing with ease. The 5.00 GHz boost clock ensures snappy response in single-threaded applications like web browsing, office software, and legacy applications. The 64 MB L3 cache is generous for a mobile processor, reducing memory latency and improving performance in cache-sensitive workloads. The quad-channel LPDDR5X memory interface with 256 GB/s bandwidth is a significant advantage over typical dual-channel mobile platforms.

Build Overview — what this CPU+GPU pairing is, its class (desktop/laptop from buildClass), and overall tier from the percentiles

This is a laptop-class build (buildClass: "laptop") combining the AMD Ryzen AI Max 390 CPU with the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Mobile GPU. The system ranks at the 77th combined percentile, indicating it outperforms the majority of CPU+GPU combinations in the database. The CPU's 91st percentile and GPU's 63rd percentile create a tier where the system is clearly above average but not at the top end for gaming or rendering.

The pairing represents a workstation-class CPU with an entry-level discrete GPU. This combination is unusual — most laptops pair high-end CPUs with high-end GPUs or mid-range CPUs with mid-range GPUs. The Ryzen AI Max 390's 55 W TDP and the RTX 4050 Mobile's 50 W TDP suggest a power budget of around 105 W for the core components, which is reasonable for a performance laptop.

The system's overall tier is "upper mid-range" based on the combined percentile. It will handle most tasks well, including gaming at 1080p, productivity, development, and content creation, but it will not excel at 4K gaming or heavy GPU rendering. The CPU's strength makes this a better choice for compute-heavy workloads than for gaming-focused users.

FAQ

Q: What is the CPU's performance ranking among all processors?

A: The AMD Ryzen AI Max 390 ranks at the 91st percentile among all CPUs, with an average benchmark score of 56273. Its closest rival is the AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX PRO 470, which scores 56306 (0.1% higher).

Q: How does the RTX 4050 Mobile compare to desktop GPUs?

A: The RTX 4050 Mobile's average benchmark score of 19049 places it in the same performance tier as the AMD Radeon RX 6600 (19036, 0.1% behind), NVIDIA Quadro K6000 (19030, 0.1% behind), and NVIDIA RTX 2000 Ada Generation (18954, 0.5% ahead).

Q: What is the combined performance percentile for this CPU+GPU pairing?

A: The combined percentile is 77, meaning this system outperforms 77% of all CPU+GPU combinations in the database.

Q: What memory type and bandwidth does the CPU support?

A: The CPU supports LPDDR5X memory on a quad-channel interface, providing 256 GB/s of memory bandwidth. It also supports ECC memory.

Q: What is the GPU's VRAM capacity and bandwidth?

A: The GPU has 6 GB of GDDR6 memory on a 96-bit bus, delivering 192 GB/s of memory bandwidth.

Q: Does the CPU have integrated graphics?

A: Yes, the CPU includes integrated Radeon 8050S graphics, which can be used when the discrete GPU is not needed or for power saving.

Q: What is the CPU's architecture and process node?

A: The CPU uses the Zen 5 architecture (Strix Halo codename) manufactured on TSMC's 4 nm process, with a die size of 2x 70.6 mm².

Upgrade Path and Platform — socket, memory support, PCIe, PSU headroom from suggestedPsu/tdp, what a sensible next upgrade looks like

The CPU uses AMD Socket FP11, which is a mobile-specific socket, meaning CPU upgrades are not practical in most laptop designs. The memory support is LPDDR5X quad-channel with 256 GB/s bandwidth, and ECC memory is supported — this is a soldered configuration in most laptops, so memory upgrades are typically not possible. The CPU provides PCIe Gen 4 with 16 lanes, while the GPU uses PCIe 4.0 x8, leaving additional lanes for storage and other devices.

The GPU has no power connectors (power is supplied through the motherboard), and its TDP is 50 W. There is no suggested PSU figure in the FACT PACK, but the combined CPU TDP of 55 W and GPU TDP of 50 W indicate a total component power draw of approximately 105 W. In a laptop context, this is well within the capabilities of standard mobile power delivery systems.

A sensible next upgrade path for this system would involve moving to a higher-tier GPU in a future laptop, as the CPU's 91st percentile ranking provides substantial headroom for more powerful graphics. The RTX 4050 Mobile's successor (GeForce 50 Mobile) would be a natural upgrade target. Alternatively, users who need more GPU compute power could consider a laptop with a higher-tier Ada Lovelace GPU, though the CPU would remain the stronger component in any configuration.

For storage, the PCIe Gen 4 interface with 16 lanes from the CPU provides ample bandwidth for NVMe SSDs, and the system's data compression score of 487145 indicates fast storage operations. The 4 nm CPU process and 5 nm GPU process suggest this is a modern platform with reasonable longevity, though the mobile form factor limits upgradeability compared to desktop systems.

Rate My PC: AMD Ryzen AI Max 390 + NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Mobile

Apex Performer

System Balance Analysis

AMD Ryzen AI Max 390

NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Mobile

Market Position

Game Performance Benchmarks

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

Performance Insights

Optimal Performance

4K Gaming Ready

Performance Tiers Explained

Ultimate

High-End

Mid-Range

Entry Level

Legacy

GPU Analysis — VRAM, bandwidth, clocks, RT/tensor hardware, what the benchmark scores mean for rendering

Gaming Performance — measured FPS by game and resolution from measuredFpsUltraByGame (or, if dataIsMeasured is false, frame expectations qualitatively from the benchmark scores and say the figures are estimates)

Usage Scenarios — grounded in the scores: high-refresh gaming, streaming, video editing, 3D rendering, software development, student and office work

Balance and Bottleneck — which component limits which workload, using percentiles and FPS scaling as evidence

Benchmark Performance — exact CPU and GPU scores, percentile positions, and what the combined picture is

Who Should Build It — target users and industries (gamers at specific resolutions, content creators, developers, students, small business workstations) tied strictly to the measured performance

CPU Analysis — cores, clocks, architecture, what the benchmark scores mean for real workloads

Build Overview — what this CPU+GPU pairing is, its class (desktop/laptop from buildClass), and overall tier from the percentiles

FAQ

Upgrade Path and Platform — socket, memory support, PCIe, PSU headroom from suggestedPsu/tdp, what a sensible next upgrade looks like

4K Gaming Performance

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

1440p Gaming Performance

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

1080p Gaming Performance

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

Related Processors

Related Graphics Cards

Compare Your CPU

Compare Your GPU

Related PC Builds

Same CPU with Different GPUs

Same GPU with Different CPUs

Other Popular Builds