SYSTEM ANALYZER

Rate My PC: AMD Ryzen AI Max 390 + AMD Radeon 8050S

Get a comprehensive performance analysis of your gaming rig with detailed benchmarks, bottleneck detection, and upgrade recommendations

Build Configuration

Select your components

PROCESSOR (CPU)

▼

GRAPHICS CARD (GPU)

▼

96 Score

Top 4% Ranking

96 / 100

ULTIMATE READY

Apex Performer

Top 4% of systems. Capable of 4K Ultra gaming and advanced rendering.

4K 60+ FPSVR ReadyRay Tracing

System Balance Analysis

CPU vs GPU performance ratio

Well Balanced

CPU

95%

GPU

97%

PROCESSOR

AMD Ryzen AI Max 390

56,273 Benchmark Score

Top 5% Market Ranking

View Full Specs →

GRAPHICS CARD

AMD Radeon 8050S

62,108 Benchmark Score

Top 3% Market Ranking

View Full Specs →

Market Position

How your build compares to others

Budget

0-30

Mid-Range

30-60

High-End

60-85

Enthusiast

85-100

Your Build

Game Performance Benchmarks

Real-world 4K FPS in popular titles

View All Games →

Performance Insights

Tips to maximize your system

Optimal Performance

Your system is in the top tier. You can run any modern game at maximum settings.

4K Gaming Ready

Consider a 4K 144Hz monitor to fully utilize your hardware capabilities.

Compatible Games See what you can play Compare CPUs Find upgrades Compare GPUs Find upgrades

Performance Tiers Explained

90-100

Ultimate

4K Ultra gaming, VR ready, ray tracing enabled, professional workloads

4K 60+ FPS VR Ready

70-89

High-End

1440p Ultra or 4K High settings, excellent for modern AAA titles

1440p Ultra 4K High

50-69

Mid-Range

1080p Ultra or 1440p Medium, great value for most gamers

1080p Ultra 1440p Med

30-49

Entry Level

1080p Medium settings, suitable for eSports and older titles

1080p Med eSports

0-29

Legacy

Basic gaming, older titles, consider upgrading for modern games

720p-1080p Low Older Games

The AMD Ryzen AI Max 390 and AMD Radeon 8050S pairing represents a unified mobile platform built around a single, large die. The CPU and GPU share the same physical package, memory pool, and power envelope, which fundamentally shapes what this system can do and where its limits lie. This analysis walks through the platform constraints, measured benchmark results, and the estimated performance picture for various workloads.

Upgrade Path and Platform

The platform is anchored by the AMD Socket FP11, which is a mobile-specific package. Because the CPU and GPU are integrated into the same Strix Halo die, there is no discrete GPU upgrade path in the traditional sense. The Radeon 8050S is the integrated graphics solution, and its performance is tied to the system's shared memory architecture. The data shows no separate graphics card slot or external power connector options for the GPU, as the slot width is listed as "IGP" and power connectors are "None."

Memory support is limited to LPDDR5X, running on a quad-channel bus. This configuration yields a memory bandwidth of 256.0 GB/s, which is a critical figure for the integrated GPU since it shares this bandwidth with the CPU. ECC memory is supported, which is unusual for a mobile platform and suggests an intended use case in professional or scientific computing where data integrity is paramount. The memory bus width for the GPU is listed as "System Shared," meaning the GPU has no dedicated VRAM; it draws from the same pool as the CPU.

PCIe connectivity is provided by the CPU, with Gen 4 and 16 lanes. This is sufficient for connecting high-speed NVMe storage or external devices, but it is not PCIe Gen 5 for the CPU lanes. The GPU itself, however, reports a bus interface of PCIe 5.0 x16, but since it is integrated, this likely refers to the internal fabric connection rather than an external slot.

The thermal design power (TDP) for both the CPU and GPU is listed at 55 W. There is no suggested PSU figure in the data, which is expected for a laptop-class part. The power envelope is shared between the two components, so any increase in CPU load can reduce the power available to the GPU and vice versa. A sensible next upgrade within this platform would be increasing system memory, as the GPU performance scales with available memory bandwidth and capacity. However, the socket and integrated nature mean that a CPU or GPU upgrade would require replacing the entire board or system.

Benchmark Performance

The combined percentile for this build is 90, placing it in the top tenth of all systems tracked. The CPU holds a percentile of 91 against all CPUs, and the GPU holds a percentile of 89 against all GPUs. This near-equal standing suggests a balanced pairing at the high end of mobile performance.

Looking at CPU-specific benchmarks, the Cinebench R23 multicore score is 36064, while the single-core score is 5091. The multicore result is roughly 7 times the single-core score, which aligns with the 12-core, 24-thread configuration. The Cinebench R20 multicore score is 15146, and the single-core score is 2138. In the older R15 test, the multicore score is 3635, and the single-core score is 513. These numbers show strong scaling across cores without a significant single-thread deficit.

PassMark results add another layer. The multithread score is 41737, and the single-thread score is 4028. Integer math scores 146519, floating point math scores 90594, and extended instructions (SIMD) score 38716. Data compression scores 487145, data encryption scores 25097, and random string sorting scores 53113. Physics simulation scores 2761, and finding prime numbers scores 316. The average benchmark score for the CPU is 56273.

The nearest rivals provide context. The AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX PRO 470 has an average score of 56306, which is 0.1% higher than the Ryzen AI Max 390. The Intel Core i9-14900HX scores 56004, which is 0.5% lower. The AMD Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3955WX scores 56555, which is 0.5% higher. The Intel Core 7 253PQE scores 55919, which is 0.6% lower. This places the Ryzen AI Max 390 in a tight cluster with these high-end mobile and workstation parts, with deltas under 1% in either direction.

On the GPU side, the Geekbench OpenCL score is 65818, and the Vulkan score is 58398. The average benchmark score for the GPU is 62108. The nearest rivals show a similar clustering: the AMD Radeon Pro W6600M scores 61896, which is 0.3% lower. The AMD Radeon Pro Vega 56 scores 63693, which is 2.5% higher. The AMD Radeon RX 7600M scores 63775, which is 2.6% higher. The AMD Radeon RX 9060 XT LP scores 63830, which is 2.7% higher. The Radeon 8050S is within a few percentage points of these discrete mobile GPUs, which is remarkable for an integrated solution.

The combined picture suggests a system that can handle both CPU-intensive and GPU-intensive tasks without one component drastically outclassing the other. The percentile positions are close, and the rival deltas are small, indicating that neither the CPU nor the GPU is a clear bottleneck in the abstract.

CPU Analysis

The AMD Ryzen AI Max 390 is built on the Zen 5 architecture, codenamed Strix Halo. It uses a 4 nm process from TSMC, with a die size of 2x 70.6 mm². The processor has 12 cores and 24 threads, with a base clock of 3.20 GHz and a boost clock of 5.00 GHz. The cache hierarchy includes 80 KB of L1 per core, 1 MB of L2 per core, and 64 MB of shared L3 cache. This large L3 cache is a significant asset for workloads that benefit from shared data access across cores.

The Cinebench R23 multicore score of 36064 is strong for a 55 W mobile part. The single-core score of 5091 indicates that the boost clock of 5.00 GHz is effective in lightly threaded tasks. The PassMark single-thread score of 4028 confirms that the CPU does not sacrifice single-thread performance for multicore capability.

In real workloads, the data suggests strong performance in multi-threaded applications like video rendering, 3D modeling, and software compilation. The Cinebench R20 multicore score of 15146 and the PassMark multithread score of 41737 are consistent with a processor that can handle substantial parallel workloads. The PassMark integer math score of 146519 and floating point math score of 90594 indicate solid arithmetic throughput, which matters for scientific simulations and financial modeling.

The data encryption score of 25097 and extended instructions score of 38716 show that the CPU has capable SIMD and cryptographic acceleration. The data compression score of 487145 is unusually high, suggesting that archiving and compression tasks would complete quickly. The random string sorting score of 53113 reflects strong memory and cache performance for sorting algorithms.

The CPU's position relative to its rivals is notable. The delta of -0.1% against the Ryzen AI 9 HX PRO 470 and +0.5% against the Intel Core i9-14900HX means that the Ryzen AI Max 390 is effectively in the same performance tier as these flagship mobile processors. The Threadripper PRO 3955WX, a workstation-class desktop chip, is only 0.5% ahead, which speaks to the efficiency of the Zen 5 architecture at a 55 W TDP.

Who Should Build It

The target users for this platform are those who need high-end performance in a laptop form factor without the option to upgrade components later. The 91st percentile CPU and 89th percentile GPU mean that this system is suitable for power users who run demanding applications daily.

Content creators who work with 4K video editing, motion graphics, or large photo libraries will benefit from the multicore CPU performance. The Cinebench R23 multicore score of 36064 and the PassMark multithread score of 41737 indicate that rendering timelines and exporting projects will be faster than on typical laptops. The data compression score of 487145 suggests that archiving raw footage or large project files is also efficient.

Software developers who compile large codebases or run multiple virtual machines will find the 12 cores and 24 threads useful. The PassMark integer math score of 146519 and the extended instructions score of 38716 point to strong performance in build automation and parallel test execution. The ECC memory support adds reliability for long-running development servers.

Students in engineering, data science, or architecture programs who need to run CAD, MATLAB, or statistical analysis packages will have a capable machine. The CPU's floating point math score of 90594 and the 64 MB of L3 cache help with iterative numerical computations.

Small business workstations that handle accounting, database management, or customer relationship management software will see responsive performance. The single-thread score of 4028 ensures that legacy single-threaded applications still run smoothly, while the multithread score allows for background tasks like antivirus scans or backup processes without slowing down interactive work.

Gamers who want a laptop that can play modern titles at high settings will be served by the GPU, but the lack of a discrete upgrade path means they should choose the configuration carefully. The 89th GPU percentile indicates that this is not a budget gaming part, but it is also not the top-tier mobile GPU.

Balance and Bottleneck

The balance between CPU and GPU is close, with percentiles of 91 and 89 respectively. However, the shared power envelope of 55 W for both components introduces a dynamic bottleneck. When the CPU is fully loaded in a multi-threaded task, the GPU has less power headroom, which can reduce its clock speeds and frame rates in gaming or rendering tasks that run concurrently.

The memory bandwidth of 256.0 GB/s is a shared resource. The GPU has no dedicated VRAM, so its performance is directly tied to this bandwidth. In gaming at high resolutions, the GPU will compete with the CPU for memory access. The benchmark scores suggest that the GPU can achieve performance close to discrete GPUs like the Radeon RX 7600M, which has its own VRAM. The delta of -2.6% against the RX 7600M indicates that the shared memory architecture does not severely handicap the integrated GPU in compute tasks.

In CPU-bound workloads like data compression or encryption, the GPU is largely idle, so the CPU can use the full 55 W envelope. The PassMark data compression score of 487145 confirms this. In GPU-bound workloads like Vulkan graphics, the CPU has lower utilization, so the GPU can access more power. The Geekbench Vulkan score of 58398 shows that the GPU can perform well when given the resources.

The bottleneck shifts depending on the workload. For gaming at 1080p or 1440p, the GPU is likely the limiting factor, as the CPU's single-core performance is sufficient for most game logic. For productivity tasks like video encoding or 3D rendering, the CPU is the primary constraint, and the GPU assists where possible. The lack of measured FPS data means that precise bottleneck identification is not possible, but the benchmark scores imply a system where neither component dominates the other.

GPU Analysis

The AMD Radeon 8050S is an integrated GPU based on the RDNA 3.5 architecture, part of the Navi Mobile (RX 8000M) generation. It is manufactured on a 4 nm process at TSMC, with a die size of 308 mm². The GPU has 2048 shading units, 128 texture mapping units, and 64 render output units. It includes 32 ray tracing cores, which is significant for a mobile integrated GPU.

Clock speeds are listed as a base of 1295 MHz and a boost of 2800 MHz. The pixel rate is 179.2 GPixel/s, and the texture rate is 358.4 GTexel/s. The FP32 performance is 11.47 TFLOPS, with FP16 also at 11.47 TFLOPS, indicating a 1:1 ratio. This is a capable compute figure for an integrated part.

Memory is system shared, with no dedicated VRAM size or bus width. The bandwidth is listed as "System Dependent," which means it relies on the CPU's 256.0 GB/s quad-channel LPDDR5X memory. This is a double-edged sword: it allows for flexible memory allocation, but it also means that the GPU's effective bandwidth can be lower if the CPU is also accessing memory heavily.

The Geekbench OpenCL score of 65818 is a strong compute result. The Vulkan score of 58398 is also solid, suggesting good graphics API performance. The GPU's percentile of 89 places it above the vast majority of GPUs, but the nearest rivals show that it is not a top-tier part. The delta of -2.5% against the Radeon Pro Vega 56 and -2.6% against the RX 7600M indicates that the 8050S is slightly behind these discrete mobile GPUs.

For rendering tasks, the 32 RT cores provide hardware-accelerated ray tracing, which can improve lighting and reflection quality in supported games and 3D applications. The FP32 throughput of 11.47 TFLOPS is sufficient for real-time rendering at moderate settings. The lack of tensor cores means that AI-accelerated features like DLSS or similar upscaling technologies are not available, though the GPU supports DirectX 12 Ultimate, OpenGL 4.6, and Vulkan 1.4.

Usage Scenarios

High-refresh gaming: The GPU's Vulkan score of 58398 and OpenCL score of 65818 indicate that the Radeon 8050S can drive modern games at playable frame rates, but the lack of measured FPS data means exact figures are estimates. At 1080p, the system is likely to achieve high frame rates in esports titles, while demanding AAA games may require lower settings to maintain a high refresh rate. The CPU's single-core score of 4028 ensures that game logic and physics are not a bottleneck.

Streaming: The CPU's 12 cores and 24 threads are well-suited for encoding video while gaming. The Cinebench R23 multicore score of 36064 suggests that software encoding will not severely impact game performance. The GPU's shared memory architecture means that streaming software can allocate memory as needed, but the 55 W total power envelope may cause frame drops if both CPU and GPU are heavily loaded.

Video editing: The multicore CPU performance is excellent for timeline scrubbing and export rendering. The PassMark multithread score of 41737 and the floating point math score of 90594 support fast processing of color grading and effects. The GPU's OpenCL score of 65818 can accelerate effects that use GPU compute, such as motion blur or stabilization.

3D rendering: For CPU-based rendering engines, the Ryzen AI Max 390's Cinebench R23 multicore score of 36064 is strong. For GPU-based rendering, the Radeon 8050S's FP32 throughput of 11.47 TFLOPS is capable but not class-leading. The 32 RT cores provide ray tracing acceleration, which is beneficial for final-frame renders.

Software development: The CPU's integer math score of 146519 and data compression score of 487145 are useful for compiling code and packaging binaries. The 24 threads allow for parallel builds, and the single-core score of 4028 ensures that interactive development tools remain responsive.

Student and office work: The single-thread score of 4028 is more than adequate for word processing, spreadsheets, and web browsing. The multithread score of 41737 means that background tasks like indexing or virus scans do not degrade performance. The ECC memory support adds a layer of reliability for long document sessions.

Build Overview

This build is a laptop-class system that combines the AMD Ryzen AI Max 390 CPU with the AMD Radeon 8050S integrated GPU. Both components are part of the same Strix Halo die, sharing a 55 W TDP and a 256.0 GB/s quad-channel LPDDR5X memory bus. The combined percentile is 90, which places this system in the top 10% of all tracked builds.

The CPU is a 12-core, 24-thread Zen 5 processor with a boost clock of 5.00 GHz, and the GPU is an RDNA 3.5 integrated part with 2048 shading units and 32 RT cores. The average CPU benchmark score is 56273, and the average GPU benchmark score is 62108. This is a high-tier mobile platform designed for users who need desktop-class performance in a portable form factor.

The integrated nature of the GPU means that there is no discrete graphics card, and the memory is system shared. This limits the upgrade path to adding more system memory, but it also simplifies the build and reduces power consumption. The system is not a budget option, but it is also not at the absolute top of the performance charts, as the nearest rivals show deltas of up to 2.7% on the GPU side and 0.6% on the CPU side.

FAQ

Q: What socket does the AMD Ryzen AI Max 390 use?

A: The CPU uses AMD Socket FP11, which is a mobile-specific socket.

Q: How much L3 cache does the CPU have?

A: The CPU has 64 MB of shared L3 cache.

Q: What is the GPU's FP32 performance?

A: The Radeon 8050S has an FP32 performance of 11.47 TFLOPS.

Q: Does the GPU have dedicated VRAM?

A: No, the GPU uses system shared memory, with the memory size, type, and bus width all listed as "System Shared."

Q: What is the combined percentile of this build?

A: The combined percentile is 90, meaning it outperforms 90% of tracked systems.

Q: What is the CPU's Cinebench R23 multicore score?

A: The Cinebench R23 multicore score is 36064.

Q: How does the GPU compare to the AMD Radeon RX 7600M?

A: The GPU is 2.6% behind the Radeon RX 7600M in average benchmark score.

Gaming Performance

The FACT PACK contains no measured FPS data for this exact CPU and GPU combination. No rows exist for measuredFpsUltraByGame, and the dataIsMeasured field is false. Therefore, all frame rate discussions are estimates based on the benchmark scores and should be treated as approximations.

The GPU's Geekbench Vulkan score of 58398 and OpenCL score of 65818 provide a basis for estimating gaming performance. In comparison to the nearest rival, the Radeon RX 7600M, which is 2.6% ahead, the 8050S should deliver frame rates close to that discrete mobile GPU. At 1080p with ultra settings, the system is likely to achieve playable frame rates in most titles, though exact numbers depend on the game's optimization.

At 1440p, the shared memory bandwidth of 256.0 GB/s may become a limiting factor, as the GPU competes with the CPU for memory access. The 32 RT cores suggest that ray tracing effects are possible, but at a significant performance cost. For esports titles like Counter-Strike or Valorant, the CPU's single-core score of 4028 and the GPU's high boost clock of 2800 MHz should support frame rates well above 60 FPS, potentially reaching high refresh rates on a 144Hz panel.

For AAA games like Cyberpunk 2077 or Assassin's Creed, the system will likely require medium to high settings at 1080p to maintain a smooth experience. The FP32 throughput of 11.47 TFLOPS is comparable to mid-range discrete GPUs, so demanding titles will not run at maximum settings with high frame rates. The GPU's percentile of 89 places it in the upper echelon of all GPUs, but the lack of dedicated VRAM and the shared power envelope with the CPU mean that sustained gaming performance may be lower than the peak benchmark scores suggest.

The data indicates that this is a capable gaming platform for 1080p and light 1440p gaming, but it is not a replacement for a high-end discrete GPU. Users who prioritize gaming should consider the system's 55 W TDP and shared memory architecture when setting expectations for frame rates.

Rate My PC: AMD Ryzen AI Max 390 + AMD Radeon 8050S

Apex Performer

System Balance Analysis

AMD Ryzen AI Max 390

AMD Radeon 8050S

Market Position

Game Performance Benchmarks

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

Performance Insights

Optimal Performance

4K Gaming Ready

Performance Tiers Explained

Ultimate

High-End

Mid-Range

Entry Level

Legacy

Upgrade Path and Platform

Benchmark Performance

CPU Analysis

Who Should Build It

Balance and Bottleneck

GPU Analysis

Usage Scenarios

Build Overview

FAQ

Gaming Performance

4K Gaming Performance

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

1440p Gaming Performance

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

1080p Gaming Performance

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

Related Processors

Related Graphics Cards

Compare Your CPU

Compare Your GPU

Related PC Builds

Same CPU with Different GPUs

Same GPU with Different CPUs

Other Popular Builds