SYSTEM ANALYZER

Rate My PC: AMD Ryzen AI Max 390 + AMD Radeon 780M

Get a comprehensive performance analysis of your gaming rig with detailed benchmarks, bottleneck detection, and upgrade recommendations

92 / 100
ULTIMATE READY

Apex Performer

Top 8% of systems. Capable of 4K Ultra gaming and advanced rendering.

4K 60+ FPSVR ReadyRay Tracing

System Balance Analysis

CPU vs GPU performance ratio
Well Balanced
CPU
95%
VS
GPU
90%
PROCESSOR

AMD Ryzen AI Max 390

56,273 Benchmark Score
Top 5% Market Ranking
View Full Specs →
GRAPHICS CARD

AMD Radeon 780M

17,588 Benchmark Score
Top 10% Market Ranking
View Full Specs →

Market Position

How your build compares to others
Budget
0-30
Mid-Range
30-60
High-End
60-85
Enthusiast
85-100
Your Build

Game Performance Benchmarks

Real-world 4K FPS in popular titles
View All Games →

Performance Insights

Tips to maximize your system

Optimal Performance

Your system is in the top tier. You can run any modern game at maximum settings.

4K Gaming Ready

Consider a 4K 144Hz monitor to fully utilize your hardware capabilities.

Compatible Games See what you can play Compare CPUs Find upgrades Compare GPUs Find upgrades

Performance Tiers Explained

90-100

Ultimate

4K Ultra gaming, VR ready, ray tracing enabled, professional workloads

4K 60+ FPS VR Ready
70-89

High-End

1440p Ultra or 4K High settings, excellent for modern AAA titles

1440p Ultra 4K High
50-69

Mid-Range

1080p Ultra or 1440p Medium, great value for most gamers

1080p Ultra 1440p Med
30-49

Entry Level

1080p Medium settings, suitable for eSports and older titles

1080p Med eSports
0-29

Legacy

Basic gaming, older titles, consider upgrading for modern games

720p-1080p Low Older Games

The AMD Ryzen AI Max 390 pairs a 12-core Zen 5 processor with the Radeon 780M integrated graphics in a mobile platform that sits at the 76th combined percentile across all benchmarked CPU-GPU pairings. This is a laptop-class build (buildClass: laptop) targeting users who need substantial multi-threaded compute without a discrete graphics solution. The CPU alone ranks in the 91st percentile against all tested processors, while the integrated GPU ranks in the 61st percentile against all tested graphics solutions — a pairing where the processor is clearly the dominant component.

CPU Analysis

The Ryzen AI Max 390 is built on the Zen 5 architecture using the Strix Halo codename, manufactured on a 4 nm process at TSMC. The chip packs 12 cores and 24 threads, with a base clock of 3.20 GHz and a boost clock of 5.00 GHz. The thermal design power is 55 W, which is notable for a mobile processor with this core count — it suggests the chip can sustain high multi-threaded loads without the power envelope of a desktop-class HX processor.

The cache hierarchy is substantial: 80 KB of L1 per core, 1 MB of L2 per core, and a shared 64 MB of L3 cache. This large L3 pool is critical for workloads that benefit from shared data access across all 12 cores, such as compiling large codebases or running complex simulations where cache misses would otherwise stall the pipeline. The 4 nm process node from TSMC keeps power density manageable, allowing the 55 W TDP to yield strong sustained performance.

Benchmark results confirm the processor's positioning. In Cinebench R23, the multi-core score of 36,064 points places it firmly in workstation territory for a mobile chip. The single-core score of 5,091 points indicates strong per-thread performance, which matters for lightly-threaded applications like spreadsheets, web browsing, and many legacy business applications. The Cinebench R20 results (15,146 multi-core, 2,138 single-core) and R15 results (3,635 multi-core, 513 single-core) follow the same pattern — this is a processor that excels when all 12 cores are engaged.

PassMark results add texture to the compute profile. The integer math score of 146,519 and floating point math score of 90,594 show balanced ALU and FPU performance, which is typical of Zen 5's unified design. The data compression score of 487,145 is especially high — this suggests strong memory bandwidth utilization and cache efficiency, likely benefiting from the quad-channel memory controller. Data encryption at 25,097 and extended instructions at 38,716 indicate solid cryptographic and SIMD throughput, useful for VPN workloads, disk encryption, and scientific computing. The multithread score of 41,737 and single-thread score of 4,028 reinforce the dual nature of this chip: it is both a high-core-count workhorse and a snappy single-core performer.

The average benchmark score of 56,273 places the Ryzen AI Max 390 within 0.1% of the AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX PRO 470 (56,306), 0.5% ahead of the Intel Core i9-14900HX (56,004), 0.5% behind the AMD Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3955WX (56,555), and 0.6% ahead of the Intel Core 7 253PQE (55,919). These deltas are all within a single percentage point, meaning the Ryzen AI Max 390 is statistically tied with these rivals in overall CPU performance. The Threadripper PRO 3955WX is a desktop workstation part, so matching it in a 55 W mobile chip is noteworthy.

For real workloads, the 12-core/24-thread configuration with 64 MB L3 cache means the chip handles multi-threaded compilation, video encoding, and 3D rendering tasks with ease. The 5.00 GHz boost clock ensures that interactive tasks like UI rendering and script execution remain responsive. The 55 W TDP combined with these scores suggests a laptop that can sustain heavy loads without excessive thermal throttling, though the quad-channel LPDDR5X memory (256.0 GB/s bandwidth) is the key enabler for memory-hungry workloads.

Benchmark Performance

The CPU's average benchmark score of 56,273 and 91st percentile ranking against all CPUs means this processor outperforms roughly 91% of all tested processors in the database. The nearest rivals — all within 0.6% — are the AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX PRO 470, Intel Core i9-14900HX, AMD Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3955WX, and Intel Core 7 253PQE. This is an elite tier for mobile computing, matching the performance of high-end desktop workstation chips from a few generations ago.

The GPU's average benchmark score is 17,588, placing it in the 61st percentile against all GPUs. Its nearest rivals are the AMD Radeon Pro 560 (17,551, 0.2% ahead), NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 (17,639, 0.3% ahead), AMD Radeon HD 7790 (17,666, 0.4% ahead), and AMD Radeon Pro 460 (17,509, 0.5% behind). The comparison to the RTX 4060 is striking — a modern discrete GPU — but the 780M is an integrated part with system-shared memory, so real-world gaming performance will differ substantially from that desktop card due to memory bandwidth constraints.

In specific GPU benchmarks, the Radeon 780M scores 480 in 3DMark Steel Nomad DX12, 18,602 in Geekbench OpenCL, and 33,683 in Geekbench Vulkan. The Vulkan score is notably higher than OpenCL, suggesting the RDNA 3.0 architecture performs well under Vulkan's lower-overhead API. The 3DMark Steel Nomad score of 480 is modest — this is a modern DX12 test that stresses geometry and ray tracing, areas where integrated graphics typically struggle.

The combined picture is a system where CPU performance is outstanding (91st percentile) and GPU performance is average (61st percentile). This creates a lopsided profile: the processor can handle the heaviest compute tasks, but the graphics solution will bottleneck any GPU-intensive workload. The combined percentile of 76 reflects this imbalance — the pairing is better than most laptops but not exceptional because the GPU drags down the overall score.

Upgrade Path and Platform

The Ryzen AI Max 390 uses the AMD Socket FP11, which is a laptop-specific socket. The memory support is LPDDR5X with a quad-channel bus, delivering 256.0 GB/s of bandwidth. ECC memory is supported, which is unusual for a mobile platform and valuable for scientific computing or financial modeling where data integrity is paramount. The PCIe implementation is Gen 4 with 16 lanes (CPU only), which is sufficient for a high-end NVMe SSD and potentially an external GPU enclosure.

The integrated graphics is the Radeon 8050S, which is a separate IGP from the Radeon 780M used in this build pairing. The CPU's memory bandwidth of 256.0 GB/s is the key resource for both CPU and GPU workloads, since the 780M uses system-shared memory.

The GPU's TDP is 15 W, and the suggested PSU field is null — for a laptop, PSU headroom is irrelevant since power delivery is handled by the system's adapter. The CPU's 55 W TDP combined with the GPU's 15 W TDP suggests a total package that is power-efficient, likely suitable for a thin-and-light chassis with adequate cooling.

A sensible next upgrade path would be to move to a system with a discrete GPU, since the integrated 780M is the clear limiting factor. However, the CPU's 91st percentile performance means the processor itself will remain relevant for years. For users who need more graphics performance, an external GPU over the PCIe Gen 4 x8 interface (the GPU's bus interface) could extend the system's lifespan, though the laptop form factor makes this less practical than on a desktop.

Balance and Bottleneck

The data clearly shows that the CPU is the stronger component. The CPU sits in the 91st percentile while the GPU sits in the 61st percentile — a 30-point gap. In any workload that is primarily GPU-bound, the Radeon 780M will be the bottleneck. Conversely, in CPU-bound tasks like compilation, data processing, or multi-threaded rendering, the Ryzen AI Max 390 will deliver performance that rivals desktop workstation chips.

The GPU's nearest rival list includes the RTX 4060 (0.3% ahead in average score), but the 780M's system-shared memory and 15 W TDP mean it cannot sustain the same frame rates as a discrete card with dedicated VRAM. The 3DMark Steel Nomad score of 480 indicates that modern DX12 games with heavy geometry will run at low settings, while the Geekbench Vulkan score of 33,683 suggests better performance in Vulkan-based titles.

For FPS scaling, the CPU's 5.00 GHz boost clock and 64 MB L3 cache mean it can feed frames to the GPU at high rates, but the GPU's 768 shading units and 32 ROPs will cap output at lower resolutions. At 1080p, the 780M can deliver playable frame rates in esports titles, but at 1440p or 4K, the GPU will be the definitive bottleneck. The CPU will rarely be the limiting factor in gaming; the bottleneck is almost always the integrated graphics.

Usage Scenarios

High-refresh gaming: The Radeon 780M's 61st percentile ranking and 3DMark Steel Nomad score of 480 indicate that high-refresh (144 Hz+) gaming is only feasible in lightly demanding titles like esports games at low-to-medium settings. The CPU's 5.00 GHz boost clock ensures frame pacing is smooth, but the GPU's 8.909 TFLOPS FP32 throughput will cap frame rates well below what a high-refresh panel can display in AAA titles.

Streaming: The CPU's 12 cores and 24 threads provide ample headroom for software encoding while gaming, since the GPU is too weak to handle hardware encoding without affecting game performance. The 55 W TDP and 4 nm process mean thermal headroom is sufficient for sustained streaming sessions. The PassMark multithread score of 41,737 supports concurrent encoding and gaming workloads.

Video editing: The Cinebench R23 multi-core score of 36,064 and PassMark data compression score of 487,145 make this a strong processor for video editing in applications like Premiere Pro or DaVinci Resolve. The 256.0 GB/s memory bandwidth helps with 4K timeline scrubbing and effect rendering. The GPU's 61st percentile ranking means GPU-accelerated effects will be slower than on systems with discrete graphics.

3D rendering: The 12 cores and 64 MB L3 cache deliver a Cinebench R23 multi-core score of 36,064, which is competitive with desktop workstation chips. CPU-based rendering in Blender or V-Ray will be fast, but GPU rendering via the 780M will be limited by its 8.909 TFLOPS FP32 throughput and system-shared memory bandwidth.

Software development: The 12-core/24-thread configuration with 5.00 GHz boost clock handles parallel builds efficiently. The PassMark integer math score of 146,519 and extended instructions score of 38,716 indicate strong performance for code compilation and cryptographic operations. The 91st percentile CPU ranking means this laptop can handle large codebases without slowdowns.

Student and office work: The single-core Cinebench R23 score of 5,091 and PassMark single-thread score of 4,028 ensure snappy performance in word processing, spreadsheets, and web browsing. The 55 W TDP and laptop form factor make it portable, while the 91st percentile CPU performance future-proofs against demanding productivity applications.

FAQ

Q: How does the Ryzen AI Max 390 compare to the Intel Core i9-14900HX in CPU performance?

A: The Ryzen AI Max 390 has an average benchmark score of 56,273, which is 0.5% higher than the Intel Core i9-14900HX's 56,004. The difference is within one percentage point, making them statistically equivalent in overall CPU performance.

Q: What is the GPU's percentile ranking against all GPUs?

A: The AMD Radeon 780M ranks in the 61st percentile against all GPUs, with an average benchmark score of 17,588. This places it in the middle of the pack, roughly equivalent to an NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 in average score (17,639, 0.3% higher).

Q: What memory bandwidth does the CPU support?

A: The Ryzen AI Max 390 supports LPDDR5X memory with a quad-channel bus, delivering 256.0 GB/s of memory bandwidth. It also supports ECC memory, which is unusual for a mobile platform.

Q: What is the CPU's TDP and what does it mean for cooling?

A: The CPU has a 55 W TDP. Combined with the GPU's 15 W TDP, this suggests a total system power draw that is manageable for a laptop chassis, though sustained multi-threaded workloads will require adequate cooling to maintain boost clocks.

Q: Is the Radeon 780M suitable for 3D rendering?

A: The GPU's FP32 throughput is 8.909 TFLOPS, and its 3DMark Steel Nomad score is 480. This is sufficient for light GPU rendering tasks but will be significantly slower than discrete GPUs. CPU-based rendering via the 12-core processor is the stronger path.

Q: What does the 76th combined percentile mean for this pairing?

A: The combined percentile of 76 indicates that this CPU-GPU pairing outperforms 76% of all tested pairings in the database. The CPU's 91st percentile and GPU's 61st percentile show a clear performance gap, with the CPU carrying most of the overall score.

Q: Does the GPU have dedicated VRAM?

A: No, the Radeon 780M uses system-shared memory. The memory size, type, bus width, and bandwidth are all listed as "System Shared" or "System Dependent," meaning it relies on the CPU's LPDDR5X memory, which has 256.0 GB/s bandwidth.

Who Should Build It

This pairing targets users who prioritize CPU performance over GPU performance in a laptop form factor. Gamers at 1080p with esports titles will find acceptable frame rates, but those seeking high-refresh AAA gaming at 1440p or 4K should look elsewhere — the GPU's 61st percentile ranking will not deliver the required frame rates.

Content creators working in video editing or 3D rendering will benefit from the CPU's 91st percentile performance, particularly the Cinebench R23 multi-core score of 36,064 and the 64 MB L3 cache. Software developers compiling large codebases will see strong performance from the 12 cores and 24 threads, with the PassMark integer math score of 146,519 supporting heavy build workloads.

Students and small business users who need a portable system with excellent CPU performance for multitasking, data analysis, and office productivity will find the 55 W TDP and 12-core configuration well-suited. The ECC memory support is a unique advantage for financial modeling or scientific computing where data integrity matters. The 256.0 GB/s memory bandwidth benefits any workload that moves large datasets, from database queries to video preview.

Build Overview

This is a laptop-class build (buildClass: laptop) pairing the AMD Ryzen AI Max 390 CPU with the AMD Radeon 780M integrated GPU. The CPU is a 12-core Zen 5 processor on the Strix Halo platform, manufactured on a 4 nm TSMC process, with a 55 W TDP and a 91st percentile CPU ranking. The GPU is an RDNA 3.0 integrated part with a 15 W TDP and a 61st percentile GPU ranking.

The combined percentile of 76 places this pairing in the upper-middle tier of all tested CPU-GPU combinations. The CPU's performance is elite — matching desktop workstation chips like the AMD Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3955WX (within 0.5%) — while the GPU is merely average. This is a system designed for compute-heavy tasks that do not require discrete graphics, such as software development, data processing, and CPU-based rendering. The 256.0 GB/s memory bandwidth from the quad-channel LPDDR5X is the critical enabler for both CPU and GPU workloads, and the 4 nm process keeps the power draw low enough for a laptop chassis.

GPU Analysis

The AMD Radeon 780M is built on the RDNA 3.0 architecture using the Phoenix chip, manufactured on a 4 nm TSMC process with 25,390 million transistors on a 178 mm² die. The GPU has 768 shading units, 48 texture mapping units, and 32 ROPs, with a base clock of 800 MHz and a boost clock of 2900 MHz. The pixel rate is 92.80 GPixel/s and the texture rate is 139.2 GTexel/s, with FP32 throughput of 8.909 TFLOPS and FP16 throughput of 8.909 TFLOPS (1:1 ratio).

The GPU has 12 ray tracing cores, though the 3DMark Steel Nomad DX12 score of 480 suggests RT performance is limited — this is expected for an integrated part. The memory is system-shared, meaning there is no dedicated VRAM; the GPU relies on the CPU's LPDDR5X memory with 256.0 GB/s bandwidth. The bus interface is PCIe 4.0 x8, and the TDP is 15 W.

The Geekbench Vulkan score of 33,683 is significantly higher than the OpenCL score of 18,602, indicating the RDNA 3.0 architecture performs better under Vulkan's lower overhead. The 61st percentile ranking places it in the middle of all GPUs, with average scores nearly identical to the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 (0.3% difference) — though the RTX 4060 has dedicated VRAM, so real-world gaming will favor the discrete card.

For rendering workloads, the 8.909 TFLOPS FP32 is sufficient for light GPU acceleration in video editing or 2D compositing, but heavy 3D rendering will be CPU-bound. The 32 ROPs limit fill-rate performance, capping pixel throughput at 92.80 GPixel/s, which means high-resolution rendering will be slow. The 15 W TDP ensures the GPU does not add significant heat or power draw to the system, but it also caps sustained performance.

Gaming Performance

No measured FPS data exists for this exact CPU-GPU combination — the FACT PACK contains no measured FPS rows for the AMD Ryzen AI Max 390 with the AMD Radeon 780M. All FPS figures discussed here are estimates derived from the benchmark scores and should be treated as approximations rather than verified measurements.

Based on the GPU's 3DMark Steel Nomad score of 480 and its 61st percentile ranking, frame rates in modern AAA titles at 1080p ultra settings will be low, likely in the 20-30 FPS range for demanding games. The 8.909 TFLOPS FP32 throughput and 32 ROPs limit pixel processing, so lowering settings to medium or low will be necessary for playable frame rates. Esports titles like CS:GO or Valorant, which are less GPU-intensive, could see 60+ FPS at 1080p with competitive settings.

The CPU's 5.00 GHz boost clock and 64 MB L3 cache ensure the processor is never the bottleneck in gaming — the CPU can feed frames to the GPU at rates far exceeding what the 780M can render. The limiting factor is always the GPU's memory bandwidth (system-shared, dependent on the CPU's 256.0 GB/s) and its 768 shading units. At 1440p or 4K, frame rates will drop significantly, making these resolutions impractical for gaming. The Vulkan score of 33,683 suggests Vulkan-based games will perform better than DX12 titles, but the integrated nature of the GPU caps overall performance regardless of API.