SYSTEM ANALYZER

Rate My PC: AMD Ryzen AI Max 390 + AMD Radeon 760M

Get a comprehensive performance analysis of your gaming rig with detailed benchmarks, bottleneck detection, and upgrade recommendations

89 / 100
HIGH-END

Power Build

Top 11% of systems. Excellent for 1440p Ultra or 4K High gaming.

1440p Ultra4K High

System Balance Analysis

CPU vs GPU performance ratio
Well Balanced
CPU
95%
VS
GPU
83%
PROCESSOR

AMD Ryzen AI Max 390

56,273 Benchmark Score
Top 5% Market Ranking
View Full Specs →
GRAPHICS CARD

AMD Radeon 760M

6,019 Benchmark Score
Top 17% Market Ranking
View Full Specs →

Market Position

How your build compares to others
Budget
0-30
Mid-Range
30-60
High-End
60-85
Enthusiast
85-100
Your Build

Game Performance Benchmarks

Real-world 4K FPS in popular titles
View All Games →

Performance Insights

Tips to maximize your system

Strong Performance

Excellent for 1440p gaming. Most games will run at high/ultra settings smoothly.

Compatible Games See what you can play Compare CPUs Find upgrades Compare GPUs Find upgrades

Performance Tiers Explained

90-100

Ultimate

4K Ultra gaming, VR ready, ray tracing enabled, professional workloads

4K 60+ FPS VR Ready
70-89

High-End

1440p Ultra or 4K High settings, excellent for modern AAA titles

1440p Ultra 4K High
50-69

Mid-Range

1080p Ultra or 1440p Medium, great value for most gamers

1080p Ultra 1440p Med
30-49

Entry Level

1080p Medium settings, suitable for eSports and older titles

1080p Med eSports
0-29

Legacy

Basic gaming, older titles, consider upgrading for modern games

720p-1080p Low Older Games

The AMD Ryzen AI Max 390 is a 12-core, 24-thread mobile processor built on the Zen 5 architecture (Strix Halo), paired here with the integrated AMD Radeon 760M GPU. This combination targets a laptop class build, with the CPU delivering top-tier multi-threaded performance while the GPU provides entry-level integrated graphics capability. The data shows a significant performance asymmetry: the CPU sits at the 91st percentile among all processors, while the GPU rests at the 35th percentile among all GPUs. This pairing is fundamentally a CPU-centric platform where the integrated graphics serve as a capable complement for everyday tasks and light gaming rather than a high-end gaming solution.

FAQ

Q: What is the performance gap between the CPU and GPU in this build?

A: The AMD Ryzen AI Max 390 CPU performs at the 91st percentile among all CPUs, while the AMD Radeon 760M GPU performs at the 35th percentile among all GPUs. This represents a substantial gap, indicating the CPU is the dominant component in this pairing.

Q: How does the CPU compare to its nearest rivals?

A: The Ryzen AI Max 390 has an average benchmark score of 56273, which is 0.5% higher than the Intel Core i9-14900HX (56004) and 0.6% higher than the Intel Core 7 253PQE (55919). It trails the AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX PRO 470 by 0.1% (56306) and the AMD Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3955WX by 0.5% (56555).

Q: What are the key specifications of the integrated Radeon 760M GPU?

A: The Radeon 760M is based on the RDNA 3.0 architecture with 512 shading units, 32 texture mapping units, and 16 render output units. It has 8 ray tracing cores, a base clock of 800 MHz, and a boost clock of 2599 MHz. The GPU uses system shared memory with bandwidth that is system dependent.

Q: What is the memory configuration for this processor?

A: The Ryzen AI Max 390 supports LPDDR5X memory in a quad-channel configuration, providing 256.0 GB/s of memory bandwidth. It also supports ECC memory, which is notable for workstation-class tasks.

Q: What is the thermal design power (TDP) of the CPU and GPU?

A: The CPU has a TDP of 55 watts, while the integrated GPU has a TDP of 15 watts. This combined thermal envelope is suitable for laptop implementations.

Q: What is the production status and release date for these components?

A: Both the CPU and GPU are listed as Active in production status. The CPU was released on January 5, 2025, and the GPU was released on January 30, 2024.

Q: Is there measured FPS data available for this specific combination?

A: No, the FACT PACK contains no measured FPS data for this exact CPU+GPU pairing. All frame rate discussions in this analysis are estimates derived from the individual benchmark scores of the components.

Upgrade Path and Platform

The AMD Ryzen AI Max 390 uses the AMD Socket FP11, which is a mobile platform socket. The processor supports LPDDR5X memory in a quad-channel configuration with a substantial 256.0 GB/s of memory bandwidth, a critical feature for the integrated graphics which rely on system memory for their frame buffer. The platform supports ECC memory, adding a layer of reliability for compute-heavy workloads that value data integrity.

The CPU provides PCIe Gen 4 with 16 lanes (CPU only), which offers sufficient bandwidth for a discrete GPU or high-speed NVMe storage. However, the integrated Radeon 760M uses a PCIe 4.0 x8 bus interface, which is separate from the CPU's dedicated lanes. The GPU's memory bandwidth is listed as "System Dependent," meaning the quad-channel LPDDR5X setup directly feeds both the CPU and the integrated graphics.

For the GPU, the suggested PSU is null, and the power connectors are listed as "None," which is typical for an integrated graphics processor (IGP). The CPU TDP is 55 watts, and the GPU TDP is 15 watts, so the total power draw for this compute package is modest. A sensible next upgrade for this platform would involve pairing the Ryzen AI Max 390 with a discrete GPU via the available PCIe Gen 4 lanes, as the CPU's performance headroom (91st percentile) vastly exceeds the integrated graphics' capabilities (35th percentile). The platform's memory bandwidth is already robust, so the primary bottleneck in any upgrade scenario would be the GPU.

CPU Analysis

The AMD Ryzen AI Max 390 is a 12-core, 24-thread processor built on the Zen 5 architecture with the codename Strix Halo. It is manufactured on a 4 nm process at TSMC, with a die size consisting of 2x 70.6 mm². The base clock is 3.20 GHz, and the boost clock reaches 5.00 GHz. The cache hierarchy includes 80 KB of L1 per core, 1 MB of L2 per core, and a substantial 64 MB of shared L3 cache.

The benchmark scores paint a clear picture of a high-performance mobile CPU. In Cinebench R23, the processor scores 36064 in multi-core and 5091 in single-core. The multi-core score indicates exceptional sustained throughput for mobile workloads, placing it in the top tier of laptop processors. The single-core score of 5091 is equally impressive, suggesting strong responsiveness in lightly-threaded tasks. The PassMark multithread score of 41737 and single-thread score of 4028 corroborate this dual strength.

The data shows the Ryzen AI Max 390 sits at the 91st percentile among all CPUs, with an average benchmark score of 56273. Its nearest rivals include the AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX PRO 470 (56306, -0.1% delta), the Intel Core i9-14900HX (56004, 0.5% delta), and the AMD Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3955WX (56555, -0.5% delta). This places the Ryzen AI Max 390 in direct competition with high-end desktop and mobile parts, which is remarkable for a 55-watt mobile processor. The PassMark integer math score of 146519 and floating point math score of 90594 indicate strong general-purpose compute capability, while the data encryption score of 25097 and data compression score of 487145 show specific strengths in security and data-handling workloads.

Balance and Bottleneck

The performance asymmetry in this build is stark. The CPU operates at the 91st percentile, while the GPU operates at the 35th percentile. This means the integrated Radeon 760M will be the limiting factor in almost any graphics-intensive workload. The CPU has far more compute headroom than the GPU can utilize, so in gaming scenarios, the GPU will be the bottleneck. The data supports this conclusion: the CPU's PassMark physics score of 2761 is robust, but the GPU's PassMark G3D score of 5310 is comparatively low.

For productivity tasks that are CPU-bound, such as data compression (487145), encryption (25097), or floating-point math (90594), the CPU will perform at its full potential. However, any workload that involves GPU acceleration, such as 3D rendering or video encoding with hardware acceleration, will be constrained by the Radeon 760M's capabilities. The GPU's PassMark GPU compute score of 2840 is modest, indicating limited compute offload potential.

The memory bandwidth of 256.0 GB/s is a strong asset for both components, as the integrated GPU depends on system memory for its operation. The quad-channel LPDDR5X configuration helps mitigate the GPU's memory bandwidth limitations, but it cannot compensate for the raw compute deficit. In essence, this build is balanced for CPU-intensive tasks and unbalanced for GPU-intensive tasks, where the GPU will consistently be the limiting factor.

Gaming Performance

No measured FPS data exists for this exact CPU+GPU combination in the FACT PACK. Therefore, all frame rate expectations presented here are estimates derived from the individual benchmark scores of the components. The Radeon 760M's performance profile, indicated by its 3DMark Steel Nomad DX12 score of 400 and PassMark DirectX scores (DX9: 65, DX10: 19, DX11: 52, DX12: 25), suggests it is an entry-level integrated solution.

Based on these scores, gaming performance will be limited to esports titles and older games at lower resolutions and settings. The GPU's 512 shading units and 16 ROPs, combined with a boost clock of 2599 MHz, provide 5.323 TFLOPS of FP32 compute. This is sufficient for 1080p gaming at low to medium settings in less demanding titles, but it will struggle with modern AAA games at high settings. The 8 ray tracing cores are present, but their performance will be constrained by the overall GPU compute power.

The CPU's high single-thread score of 5091 in Cinebench R23 and 4028 in PassMark single-thread will ensure that frame pacing remains consistent, but the GPU will be the primary limiter on frame rates. For 720p or 1080p with reduced graphical fidelity, the system can deliver playable frame rates in competitive games, but high-refresh gaming at 144Hz or above is not a realistic expectation for this integrated solution. The data suggests this is a casual gaming platform rather than a dedicated gaming machine.

Usage Scenarios

High-Refresh Gaming: This scenario is not recommended based on the data. The GPU's 35th percentile ranking and low DirectX benchmark scores indicate it cannot sustain high frame rates at high refresh rates. The CPU's strong single-thread performance ensures low input latency, but the GPU will cap frame rates well below the levels needed for 144Hz displays.

Streaming: The CPU's 12 cores and 24 threads, evidenced by a Cinebench R23 multi-core score of 36064, provide ample headroom for software encoding while gaming. The PassMark multithread score of 41737 supports simultaneous encoding and gameplay, but the integrated GPU's gaming limitations will restrict the quality of the game stream itself.

Video Editing: The CPU excels in this scenario. The PassMark data compression score of 487145 and floating-point math score of 90594 indicate strong performance for video codecs and effects processing. However, the GPU's limited compute score of 2840 means GPU-accelerated effects and rendering will be slower than on systems with discrete GPUs.

3D Rendering: The CPU's multi-core performance is excellent for CPU-based rendering, with Cinebench R20 multi-core scoring 15146. The 64 MB of L3 cache further aids in complex scene processing. However, GPU-based renderers will be severely constrained by the Radeon 760M's modest 5.323 TFLOPS of FP32 compute.

Software Development: This is a strong scenario for this build. The CPU's high single-thread score of 5091 in Cinebench R23 ensures fast compilation of single-threaded tasks, while the multi-core score of 36064 accelerates parallel builds. The PassMark extended instructions score of 38716 indicates robust SIMD performance for modern code.

Student and Office Work: The build is overqualified for this scenario in CPU terms but adequate in GPU terms. The CPU's 91st percentile ranking ensures smooth multitasking across office applications, web browsing, and productivity suites. The integrated GPU's PassMark G2D score of 890 is sufficient for 2D desktop acceleration and basic productivity tasks.

Who Should Build It

This build is suited for users who prioritize CPU performance above all else and have minimal GPU requirements. The data shows the Ryzen AI Max 390 is a top-tier mobile processor, making this an excellent choice for professionals who need heavy multi-threaded compute on the go. Content creators working with CPU-based rendering, software developers compiling large codebases, and data analysts processing large datasets will benefit from the CPU's 91st percentile ranking and 24 threads.

For gamers, this build is only appropriate for those playing at 720p or 1080p with low settings in less demanding titles. The GPU's 35th percentile ranking means it is not a gaming-focused platform. Small business workstations that require reliable multi-threaded performance for office applications, financial modeling, or database management would find the CPU's capabilities well-suited, particularly with ECC memory support.

Students and general users will find the system more than capable for their needs, but they would be paying for CPU performance they may not fully utilize. The build is not recommended for users who need GPU acceleration for video editing, 3D modeling, or machine learning, as the Radeon 760M's compute capabilities are limited. The target audience is CPU-centric professionals and prosumers who value multi-threaded performance in a mobile form factor.

Build Overview

This is a laptop-class build combining the AMD Ryzen AI Max 390 CPU with the AMD Radeon 760M integrated GPU. The CPU is a 12-core, 24-thread Zen 5 processor with a 55-watt TDP, designed for high-performance mobile computing. The GPU is an RDNA 3.0 integrated solution with a 15-watt TDP, sharing system memory for its frame buffer.

The combined percentile ranking is 63, which reflects the significant disparity between the CPU's 91st percentile and the GPU's 35th percentile. This pairing represents a workstation-class CPU mated to an entry-level IGP, creating a system that excels at processor-intensive tasks but is modest in graphics performance. The build's overall tier is mid-range when considering the combined score, but it is decidedly high-end in CPU compute and low-end in GPU compute.

The platform supports LPDDR5X memory with 256.0 GB/s of bandwidth, which is a key feature for both CPU and GPU performance. The CPU's 64 MB of L3 cache and 5.00 GHz boost clock position it as a top-tier mobile processor. The GPU's 512 shading units and 8 ray tracing cores provide baseline DirectX 12 Ultimate support, but the performance is constrained by its integrated nature. This build is a CPU-first platform, and any assessment of its capabilities must center on the processor's exceptional benchmark results.

Benchmark Performance

The AMD Ryzen AI Max 390 CPU demonstrates exceptional performance across all benchmark categories. In Cinebench R15, it scores 3635 in multi-core and 513 in single-core. The Cinebench R20 results show 15146 in multi-core and 2138 in single-core. The most recent Cinebench R23 scores are 36064 multi-core and 5091 single-core. These scores indicate a processor that excels in both multi-threaded and single-threaded workloads.

The PassMark suite reinforces this picture: multithread score of 41737, single-thread score of 4028, integer math of 146519, floating-point math of 90594, data compression of 487145, and data encryption of 25097. The CPU's average benchmark score is 56273, placing it at the 91st percentile among all CPUs. Its nearest rival, the AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX PRO 470, has an average score of 56306, a mere 0.1% difference, indicating these are essentially performance equals.

The AMD Radeon 760M GPU presents a contrasting picture. Its 3DMark Steel Nomad DX12 score is 400, and its Geekbench scores are 20255 in OpenCL and 30336 in Vulkan. The PassMark G3D score is 5310, with a GPU compute score of 2840. The GPU's average benchmark score is 6019, placing it at the 35th percentile among all GPUs. Its nearest rival is the AMD Radeon RX 6400 with an average score of 6001, a 0.3% difference. The combined picture shows a CPU that outperforms 91% of all processors and a GPU that outperforms only 35% of all GPUs, resulting in a combined percentile of 63.

GPU Analysis

The AMD Radeon 760M is an integrated graphics processor based on the RDNA 3.0 architecture, manufactured on a 4 nm process at TSMC. The chip is codenamed Phoenix and contains 25,390 million transistors on a 178 mm² die. The GPU features 512 shading units, 32 texture mapping units, and 16 render output units, along with 8 ray tracing cores. The base clock is 800 MHz with a boost clock of 2599 MHz.

The memory configuration is entirely system-shared, with the GPU relying on the CPU's LPDDR5X memory. The bus width and bandwidth are listed as "System Dependent," meaning they scale with the CPU's memory configuration. In this build, the CPU provides 256.0 GB/s of memory bandwidth, which is a strong foundation for an integrated GPU but still limits performance compared to dedicated graphics memory.

The GPU's compute capabilities are quantified by its FP32 performance of 5.323 TFLOPS and FP16 performance of 5.323 TFLOPS (1:1). The pixel rate is 41.58 GPixel/s, and the texture rate is 83.17 GTexel/s. The benchmark scores show a GPU that is competitive with entry-level discrete solutions: the 3DMark Steel Nomad score of 400 and PassMark G3D score of 5310 align with the AMD Radeon RX 6400 (6001, 0.3% delta) and NVIDIA Quadro P2000 (6049, -0.5% delta). The GPU supports DirectX 12 Ultimate (12_2), OpenGL 4.6, and Vulkan 1.4, ensuring modern API compatibility. The 8 ray tracing cores provide hardware RT support, but the overall compute power limits its effectiveness in RT-enabled titles. The GPU's PassMark DirectX 9 score of 65, DirectX 11 score of 52, and DirectX 12 score of 25 indicate that performance scales down with API complexity, reinforcing its entry-level positioning.