SYSTEM ANALYZER

Rate My PC: AMD Ryzen AI Max+ 388 + NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5070 Mobile

Get a comprehensive performance analysis of your gaming rig with detailed benchmarks, bottleneck detection, and upgrade recommendations

Build Configuration

Select your components

PROCESSOR (CPU)

▼

GRAPHICS CARD (GPU)

▼

94 Score

Top 6% Ranking

94 / 100

ULTIMATE READY

Apex Performer

Top 6% of systems. Capable of 4K Ultra gaming and advanced rendering.

4K 60+ FPSVR ReadyRay Tracing

System Balance Analysis

CPU vs GPU performance ratio

Well Balanced

CPU

94%

GPU

94%

PROCESSOR

AMD Ryzen AI Max+ 388

49,796 Benchmark Score

Top 6% Market Ranking

View Full Specs →

GRAPHICS CARD

NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5070 Mobile

29,928 Benchmark Score

Top 6% Market Ranking

View Full Specs →

Market Position

How your build compares to others

Budget

0-30

Mid-Range

30-60

High-End

60-85

Enthusiast

85-100

Your Build

Game Performance Benchmarks

Real-world 4K FPS in popular titles

View All Games →

Performance Insights

Tips to maximize your system

Optimal Performance

Your system is in the top tier. You can run any modern game at maximum settings.

4K Gaming Ready

Consider a 4K 144Hz monitor to fully utilize your hardware capabilities.

Compatible Games See what you can play Compare CPUs Find upgrades Compare GPUs Find upgrades

Performance Tiers Explained

90-100

Ultimate

4K Ultra gaming, VR ready, ray tracing enabled, professional workloads

4K 60+ FPS VR Ready

70-89

High-End

1440p Ultra or 4K High settings, excellent for modern AAA titles

1440p Ultra 4K High

50-69

Mid-Range

1080p Ultra or 1440p Medium, great value for most gamers

1080p Ultra 1440p Med

30-49

Entry Level

1080p Medium settings, suitable for eSports and older titles

1080p Med eSports

0-29

Legacy

Basic gaming, older titles, consider upgrading for modern games

720p-1080p Low Older Games

The AMD Ryzen AI Max+ 388 and NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5070 Mobile pairing represents a high-end laptop configuration, combining a 4 nm Zen 5 processor with a 5 nm Blackwell 2.0 GPU. The CPU sits at the 90th percentile among all processors, while the GPU ranks at the 75th percentile, placing the combined platform at the 83rd percentile overall. This is a desktop-class performance envelope in a laptop chassis, though the data indicates that no measured frame rates exist for this specific combination; all gaming performance references are estimates derived from benchmark scores.

CPU Analysis

The AMD Ryzen AI Max+ 388 is built on the Zen 5 architecture, codenamed Strix Halo, and manufactured on TSMC's 4 nm process. It houses 8 cores and 16 threads, with a base clock of 3.60 GHz and a boost clock of 5.00 GHz. The chip operates within a 55 W TDP and is mounted on the AMD Socket FP11. The cache hierarchy includes 80 KB of L1 per core, 1 MB of L2 per core, and 32 MB of shared L3 cache. The processor supports LPDDR5X memory across a quad-channel bus, delivering 256.0 GB/s of memory bandwidth, with ECC memory support included.

Benchmark data shows the CPU achieving a Cinebench R23 multi-core score of 18759 and a single-core score of 1960. The R15 results are 2872 multi-core and 298 single-core. PassMark results further illustrate the chip's capability: multi-thread score of 33486, single-thread of 4185, integer math at 109588, floating-point math at 72722, extended instructions at 32719, and data compression at 400887. The average benchmark score is 49796, placing it at the 90th percentile versus all CPUs.

Compared to its nearest rivals, the Ryzen AI Max+ 388 is statistically tied with the Intel Core 9 273PE, which scores 49845 on average, representing a -0.1% delta. It edges out the Intel Core i5-14600KF (49394, +0.8% delta), the AMD Ryzen 9 7900 (49228, +1.2% delta), and the AMD Ryzen 7 PRO 5755G (49196, +1.2% delta). These deltas are minor, indicating that the Zen 5 chip trades blows with established desktop-class silicon. For real workloads, the strong integer and floating-point scores suggest robust performance in scientific computing and financial modeling, while the high data compression score indicates efficient handling of archiving and database tasks.

Usage Scenarios

High-refresh gaming: The CPU's single-thread score of 4185 in PassMark and 1960 in Cinebench R23 indicates strong per-core performance, which is critical for high-refresh gaming. However, the GPU's 75th percentile ranking and the lack of measured FPS data mean frame rates are estimates. The RTX 5070 Mobile should handle 1080p and 1440p at high refresh rates, but 4K ultra settings will likely be constrained by the GPU's 8 GB VRAM and 128-bit memory bus.

Streaming: The CPU's 8-core, 16-thread configuration, combined with a 55 W TDP, provides ample headroom for encoding while gaming. The PassMark multi-thread score of 33486 suggests the processor can handle background encoding tasks without significantly impacting game performance, though the lack of NVENC-specific data leaves encoding quality to the GPU's Blackwell architecture.

Video editing: The combination of the CPU's quad-channel LPDDR5X memory (256.0 GB/s) and the GPU's 8 GB GDDR7 VRAM (384.0 GB/s bandwidth) is well-suited for timeline scrubbing and effects rendering. The CPU's 72722 floating-point math score supports complex color grading and compositing, while the GPU's 13.13 TFLOPS FP32 compute accelerates GPU-accelerated effects.

3D rendering: The CPU's Cinebench R23 multi-core score of 18759 positions it comfortably for CPU-based rendering, though it trails high-core-count workstations. The GPU's 13.13 TFLOPS FP32 performance and 144 tensor cores provide substantial acceleration for RTX-accelerated renderers, but the 8 GB VRAM may limit scene complexity in GPU-only rendering workflows.

Software development: The CPU's 400887 data compression score and 20092 encryption score indicate strong performance for code compilation and secure data handling. The 16-thread count handles parallel builds effectively, while the 90th percentile CPU ranking ensures snappy responsiveness for IDE and debugging tools.

Student and office work: The CPU's single-thread performance (4185 PassMark) and the platform's 83rd combined percentile make this overkill for typical productivity tasks. The 55 W TDP and laptop class indicate portability, but the high performance tier suggests this is a premium choice for power users rather than budget-conscious students.

Benchmark Performance

The CPU's average benchmark score of 49796 places it at the 90th percentile, with nearest rivals within a -0.1% to 1.2% delta. The GPU's average benchmark score is 29928, at the 75th percentile, with the closest rival being the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Ti at 29945 (-0.1% delta). The combined platform sits at the 83rd percentile.

The GPU's individual benchmark results show a Geekbench OpenCL score of 122238 and Vulkan score of 116960. PassMark results are as follows: G3D score of 20355, G2D of 896, GPU compute of 8279, DirectX 12 of 93, DirectX 11 of 192, DirectX 10 of 129, and DirectX 9 of 214. The DirectX 12 score of 93 is notably lower than the DirectX 11 score, suggesting potential driver optimization issues or architectural differences in the Blackwell 2.0 design. The GPU's 75th percentile ranking puts it on par with the RTX 3070 Ti and RTX 2080 Ti, while slightly behind the AMD Radeon RX 6800 (-0.6% delta) and RX 6700 (-1.7% delta).

The combined picture is a CPU that is significantly stronger relative to its peers than the GPU. The CPU's 90th percentile versus the GPU's 75th percentile indicates a processor-heavy configuration, meaning the platform is better suited for CPU-intensive workloads like compilation and rendering than for pure graphics performance.

Gaming Performance

There are no measured FPS rows for this exact CPU+GPU combination in the FACT PACK. All frame rate expectations are estimates derived from the benchmark scores, and should be treated as approximations rather than verified results.

Based on the GPU's 75th percentile and its similarity to the RTX 3070 Ti (delta of -0.1%), the RTX 5070 Mobile is expected to deliver high refresh rates at 1080p and 1440p in most titles. The 8 GB VRAM and 384.0 GB/s bandwidth will support 1440p ultra settings, but 4K ultra will likely strain the 128-bit memory interface. The CPU's strong single-thread performance (4185 PassMark) ensures that the GPU will be the primary bottleneck in most gaming scenarios, which is the ideal balance for gaming. However, the lack of measured FPS data means that specific game performance cannot be quantified; users should expect performance in line with the RTX 3070 Ti desktop class, but with mobile power constraints (50 W TDP).

Who Should Build It

This platform is designed for gamers who prioritize 1080p and 1440p high-refresh gaming, where the GPU's performance tier is sufficient. Content creators working with video editing and 3D rendering will benefit from the CPU's 90th percentile performance, but the 8 GB VRAM limits the scale of GPU-accelerated projects. Software developers will appreciate the 16-thread CPU and its 400887 data compression score for build times, while the 55 W TDP makes this viable for a portable workstation. Students and office workers would find this significantly overpowered for their needs; the 83rd combined percentile is excessive for document processing and web browsing. Small business workstations requiring secure data handling (20092 encryption score) and moderate parallel processing would be well-served, provided the workload does not demand large GPU memory pools.

GPU Analysis

The NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5070 Mobile is built on the Blackwell 2.0 architecture, using the GB206 chip on TSMC's 5 nm process. The die contains 21,900 million transistors on an 181 mm² area, yielding a transistor density of 121.0M per mm². The GPU has 4608 shading units, 144 texture mapping units, and 48 render output units. Ray tracing is handled by 36 RT cores, while 144 tensor cores accelerate AI workloads. The GPU operates at a base clock of 907 MHz and a boost clock of 1425 MHz, with memory running at 1500 MHz (24 Gbps effective).

The memory subsystem consists of 8 GB of GDDR7 on a 128-bit bus, delivering 384.0 GB/s of bandwidth. The pixel rate is 68.40 GPixel/s, and the texture rate is 205.2 GTexel/s. FP32 performance is rated at 13.13 TFLOPS, with FP16 at 13.13 TFLOPS (1:1 ratio). The GPU has a 50 W TDP, uses an IGP slot width, and requires no power connectors. It interfaces via PCIe 5.0 x16 and supports DirectX 12 Ultimate (12_2), OpenGL 4.6, and Vulkan 1.4.

Benchmark results show the GPU achieving a PassMark G3D score of 20355, which is the primary gaming metric. The Geekbench OpenCL score of 122238 and Vulkan score of 116960 indicate strong compute performance. The DirectX 12 score of 93 is notably lower than DirectX 11's 192, which is anomalous; this could indicate that Blackwell 2.0's driver stack favors older APIs or that the benchmark is not fully optimized for the architecture. The GPU's 75th percentile ranking, with an average score of 29928, places it in the upper mid-range tier, on par with the RTX 3070 Ti and RTX 2080 Ti.

For rendering, the 13.13 TFLOPS FP32 performance and 144 tensor cores provide solid acceleration for real-time ray tracing and DLSS, but the 8 GB VRAM is a limiting factor for high-resolution textures and complex scenes. The 384.0 GB/s bandwidth is adequate for 1080p and 1440p gaming, but could bottleneck 4K workloads.

Balance and Bottleneck

The data indicates a CPU-heavy configuration. The CPU's 90th percentile and average score of 49796 significantly outpace the GPU's 75th percentile and 29928 average score. In CPU-bound workloads like software compilation, data compression (400887 score), and multi-threaded rendering, the processor will be the primary driver, with the GPU providing auxiliary acceleration.

In gaming, the GPU is the bottleneck. The FPS scaling is expected to be limited by the GPU's 8 GB VRAM and 128-bit memory bus, particularly at higher resolutions. The CPU's strong single-thread performance (4185 PassMark) ensures it will not bottleneck the GPU in most scenarios, but the GPU's 75th percentile means it cannot fully utilize the CPU's 90th percentile capability in graphics-heavy tasks. The DirectX 12 score of 93, compared to DirectX 11's 192, suggests that the GPU may underperform in modern APIs, potentially exacerbating the bottleneck in newer games.

In GPU compute workloads, such as AI inference (144 tensor cores) and OpenCL-based rendering (122238 Geekbench score), the GPU is the limiting factor due to its 8 GB VRAM and 50 W TDP. The CPU's memory bandwidth of 256.0 GB/s is higher than the GPU's 384.0 GB/s is not, but the GPU's memory is dedicated GDDR7, which is faster per-pin; the CPU's quad-channel LPDDR5X is shared with the system. The balance favors CPU-intensive tasks, making this a better platform for developers and content creators than for pure gaming at 4K.

Upgrade Path and Platform

The CPU uses the AMD Socket FP11, which is a mobile-specific socket, meaning CPU upgrades are unlikely without a full motherboard replacement. The platform supports LPDDR5X memory in quad-channel configuration, with ECC support, but the memory is likely soldered in a laptop form factor. The CPU provides PCIe Gen 4 with 16 lanes, while the GPU interfaces via PCIe 5.0 x16, indicating a mismatch in generations that could limit future GPU upgrades.

The GPU has a 50 W TDP and uses an IGP slot width with no power connectors, suggesting it is soldered to the motherboard. The suggested PSU is not specified, but the 50 W TDP is low, indicating the system's power supply headroom is primarily dictated by the CPU's 55 W TDP. A sensible next upgrade would be to increase system memory, as the CPU's quad-channel bandwidth of 256.0 GB/s is a strength, and more memory would benefit virtualization and large dataset workloads. However, given the mobile class and soldered components, the upgrade path is severely limited; users should consider this a fixed-configuration platform.

FAQ

Q: What is the CPU's performance percentile compared to all CPUs?

A: The AMD Ryzen AI Max+ 388 ranks at the 90th percentile, with an average benchmark score of 49796.

Q: How does the GPU compare to the RTX 3070 Ti?

A: The RTX 5070 Mobile has an average score of 29928, which is a -0.1% delta from the RTX 3070 Ti's 29945, making them statistically identical.

Q: What is the GPU's memory configuration?

A: The GPU has 8 GB of GDDR7 memory on a 128-bit bus, delivering 384.0 GB/s of bandwidth.

Q: Does the CPU support ECC memory?

A: Yes, the CPU supports ECC memory, with a quad-channel LPDDR5X bus providing 256.0 GB/s of bandwidth.

Q: What is the combined percentile of this CPU+GPU pairing?

A: The combined platform ranks at the 83rd percentile among all configurations.

Q: Are there measured FPS results for this exact combination?

A: No, there are no measured FPS rows for this exact CPU+GPU combination; all gaming performance figures are estimates.

Q: What is the CPU's boost clock speed?

A: The CPU has a boost clock of 5.00 GHz, with a base clock of 3.60 GHz.

Build Overview

This build pairs the AMD Ryzen AI Max+ 388 with the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5070 Mobile in a laptop form factor. The CPU is a 90th percentile processor, while the GPU is a 75th percentile graphics solution, resulting in an 83rd percentile combined platform. The configuration is CPU-dominant, with the processor's 8-core, 16-thread Zen 5 design and 256.0 GB/s memory bandwidth providing a strong foundation for compute-heavy workloads. The GPU, while capable of matching the RTX 3070 Ti, is constrained by its 8 GB VRAM and 50 W TDP, making it better suited for 1080p and 1440p gaming rather than 4K ultra settings. This is a high-end laptop configuration for users who need substantial CPU compute power and solid, but not class-leading, graphics performance.

Rate My PC: AMD Ryzen AI Max+ 388 + NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5070 Mobile

Apex Performer

System Balance Analysis

AMD Ryzen AI Max+ 388

NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5070 Mobile

Market Position

Game Performance Benchmarks

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

Performance Insights

Optimal Performance

4K Gaming Ready

Performance Tiers Explained

Ultimate

High-End

Mid-Range

Entry Level

Legacy

CPU Analysis

Usage Scenarios

Benchmark Performance

Gaming Performance

Who Should Build It

GPU Analysis

Balance and Bottleneck

Upgrade Path and Platform

FAQ

Build Overview

4K Gaming Performance

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

1440p Gaming Performance

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

1080p Gaming Performance

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

Related Processors

Related Graphics Cards

Compare Your CPU

Compare Your GPU

Related PC Builds

Same CPU with Different GPUs

Same GPU with Different CPUs

Other Popular Builds