SYSTEM ANALYZER

Rate My PC: AMD Ryzen AI Max+ 388 + NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Mobile

Get a comprehensive performance analysis of your gaming rig with detailed benchmarks, bottleneck detection, and upgrade recommendations

Build Configuration

Select your components

PROCESSOR (CPU)

▼

GRAPHICS CARD (GPU)

▼

94 Score

Top 6% Ranking

94 / 100

ULTIMATE READY

Apex Performer

Top 6% of systems. Capable of 4K Ultra gaming and advanced rendering.

4K 60+ FPSVR ReadyRay Tracing

System Balance Analysis

CPU vs GPU performance ratio

Well Balanced

CPU

94%

GPU

93%

PROCESSOR

AMD Ryzen AI Max+ 388

49,796 Benchmark Score

Top 6% Market Ranking

View Full Specs →

GRAPHICS CARD

NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Mobile

27,435 Benchmark Score

Top 7% Market Ranking

View Full Specs →

Market Position

How your build compares to others

Budget

0-30

Mid-Range

30-60

High-End

60-85

Enthusiast

85-100

Your Build

Game Performance Benchmarks

Real-world 4K FPS in popular titles

View All Games →

Performance Insights

Tips to maximize your system

Optimal Performance

Your system is in the top tier. You can run any modern game at maximum settings.

4K Gaming Ready

Consider a 4K 144Hz monitor to fully utilize your hardware capabilities.

Compatible Games See what you can play Compare CPUs Find upgrades Compare GPUs Find upgrades

Performance Tiers Explained

90-100

Ultimate

4K Ultra gaming, VR ready, ray tracing enabled, professional workloads

4K 60+ FPS VR Ready

70-89

High-End

1440p Ultra or 4K High settings, excellent for modern AAA titles

1440p Ultra 4K High

50-69

Mid-Range

1080p Ultra or 1440p Medium, great value for most gamers

1080p Ultra 1440p Med

30-49

Entry Level

1080p Medium settings, suitable for eSports and older titles

1080p Med eSports

0-29

Legacy

Basic gaming, older titles, consider upgrading for modern games

720p-1080p Low Older Games

The AMD Ryzen AI Max+ 388 and NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Mobile combination targets a specific niche: a high-performance laptop that balances a powerful CPU for productivity with a capable GPU for gaming and creative work. The CPU, built on the Zen 5 architecture, is a mobile powerhouse, while the GPU, based on Ada Lovelace, provides solid 1080p and 1440p performance. This pairing is not about extreme overclocking or the absolute highest frame rates; instead, it is a well-rounded platform designed for users who need both strong multi-core compute and dependable graphics acceleration. The data indicates a system that sits in the top tier for CPU performance and the upper-midrange for GPU performance, making it a versatile, if not specialized, tool.

CPU Analysis

The AMD Ryzen AI Max+ 388 is an 8-core, 16-thread processor based on the Zen 5 architecture, codenamed Strix Halo. It operates with a base clock of 3.60 GHz and a boost clock of 5.00 GHz. This is a mobile processor with a 55 W TDP, built on a 4 nm process by TSMC. The chip features a substantial cache hierarchy: 80 KB of L1 per core, 1 MB of L2 per core, and 32 MB of shared L3 cache. The memory controller supports quad-channel LPDDR5X memory, yielding a high memory bandwidth of 256.0 GB/s, which is a significant asset for integrated graphics and memory-intensive tasks. It also supports ECC memory.

Benchmark scores place this CPU in the 90th percentile among all CPUs, indicating top-tier performance. Its average benchmark score is 49796, which puts it in a near dead heat with the Intel Core 9 273PE (avg score 49845, deltaPct -0.1%). It is also just ahead of the Intel Core i5-14600KF (avg score 49394, deltaPct 0.8%) and the AMD Ryzen 9 7900 (avg score 49228, deltaPct 1.2%). In practical terms, this means the Ryzen AI Max+ 388 trades blows with desktop-class processors from the previous generation.

The benchmark breakdown shows a processor that is exceptionally strong in multi-threaded workloads. In Cinebench R23, it scores 18759 points in multi-core and 1960 points in single-core. The multi-core score represents a performance level that can handle heavy compilation, video encoding, and 3D rendering tasks with ease. The PassMark scores reinforce this: it achieves 109588 in integer math, 72722 in floating-point math, and 33486 in multithread. The data compression score is 400887, and the encryption score is 20092. The single-thread score of 4185 is also very competitive, ensuring snappy responsiveness in everyday tasks and solid performance in lightly-threaded applications. The high extended instructions score of 32719 suggests strong performance in workloads that leverage modern instruction sets like AVX-512.

For real workloads, this CPU is a productivity monster. The multi-core scores suggest that it can handle 4K video editing timelines, complex code compilations, and multi-scene 3D renders without becoming the primary bottleneck. The high memory bandwidth further amplifies its capabilities, especially for data analysis and large dataset manipulation. While the 5.00 GHz boost clock is high, the 55 W TDP indicates that sustained all-core loads will be limited by power and thermals, but the short burst performance is excellent.

GPU Analysis

The NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Mobile is a member of the GeForce 40-series, based on the Ada Lovelace architecture. It features the AD106 chip, built on a 5 nm process by TSMC, containing 22,900 million transistors on a 188 mm² die. The GPU has 4608 shading units, 144 texture mapping units, and 48 raster operation units. It is equipped with 36 RT cores and 144 tensor cores, making it fully capable of hardware-accelerated ray tracing and DLSS. The GPU operates at a base clock of 1395 MHz and a boost clock of 1695 MHz.

The memory configuration is an 8 GB GDDR6 on a 128-bit bus, with a memory clock of 2000 MHz (16 Gbps effective). This results in a memory bandwidth of 256.0 GB/s. This is a significant specification, as the bandwidth is identical to the CPU's system memory bandwidth, but it is a limited 8 GB capacity for modern games in 2026. The GPU's TDP is 115 W, and it uses an integrated form factor (IGP) with no power connectors, meaning it is soldered to the motherboard. It supports PCIe 4.0 x8 and a portable device-dependent display output.

In terms of performance, the RTX 4070 Mobile sits in the 73rd percentile of all GPUs, with an average benchmark score of 27435. Its closest rival is the AMD Radeon RX 6700 XT (avg score 27425, deltaPct 0%), and it is also comparable to the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3090 (avg score 27565, deltaPct -0.5%). This is a remarkable result, indicating that the mobile 4070 effectively matches the performance of a previous-generation desktop flagship. The data shows a strong DirectX 12 performance with a PassMark score of 85, and a G3D score of 19587. The compute score is 8399, which is lower than the gaming score, suggesting that while it is competent for compute tasks, it is not its primary strength. The Vulkan score is 108367, and the OpenCL score is 109197, which are robust numbers for content creation acceleration.

For rendering and creative work, this GPU is capable. The 36 RT cores enable hardware-accelerated ray tracing, which will significantly speed up rendering in applications that support it compared to pure CPU rendering. The 144 tensor cores provide a boost for AI-accelerated features in creative software, such as denoising and upscaling. However, the 8 GB of VRAM is a potential bottleneck for very large 3D scenes or high-resolution textures. The FP32 performance of 15.62 TFLOPS is solid, but the memory bandwidth, while good, is not exceptional for a GPU at this level. For gaming, it is a strong 1080p and 1440p card, but the 8 GB VRAM may require texture quality adjustments in some newer titles at higher resolutions.

Upgrade Path and Platform

The platform is built around the AMD Socket FP11, which is a mobile-specific socket. This means the CPU is soldered to the motherboard, and there is no traditional upgrade path for the processor. The memory support is LPDDR5X, which is also soldered on most laptops. Therefore, the primary upgrade path for a user with this system would be the storage (likely an M.2 NVMe drive) and the GPU, which is often not upgradeable in laptops. This system is a closed platform.

The CPU supports PCIe Gen 4 with 16 lanes, and the GPU uses PCIe 4.0 x8. This provides a modern, high-bandwidth connection for storage and external devices. The CPU has a TDP of 55 W, and the GPU has a TDP of 115 W. This suggests the system will require a capable cooling solution to handle the combined thermal load. While the `suggestedPsu` is null, the combined 170 W TDP of the two main components indicates a laptop power adapter in the range of 200 W or more is necessary.

A sensible next upgrade for this platform is not about the CPU or GPU, but rather about memory capacity and storage. Given the CPU's high memory bandwidth, ensuring the system has a full configuration of fast LPDDR5X memory is crucial. Upgrading to a larger, faster NVMe SSD would also be a practical move to reduce load times and improve system responsiveness. Since the CPU is already a top-tier performer, the system will remain relevant for several years, and the only meaningful upgrades are peripheral and storage-related.

Who Should Build It

This combination is designed for a specific type of user: the mobile professional who needs a high level of CPU performance for demanding workloads and also wants a GPU capable of gaming or GPU-accelerated tasks. The CPU's 90th percentile ranking makes it ideal for developers compiling large codebases, video editors working with high-resolution footage, and engineers running complex simulations. The multi-core Cinebench R23 score of 18759 and the PassMark multithread score of 33486 are strong indicators of its ability to handle these tasks.

For gamers, this system is a high-refresh 1080p and 1440p machine. The GPU's 73rd percentile ranking and its equivalence to the desktop RTX 3090 in average score mean it can run almost any game at high settings, though the 8 GB VRAM may be a limiting factor in the most demanding titles. This is not a 4K gaming laptop, but it is excellent for competitive and mainstream gaming.

Students and small business workstations will also find this platform attractive. The CPU's single-thread score of 4185 ensures a snappy desktop experience for office applications, web browsing, and coding. The integrated Radeon 8060S graphics, while not the primary GPU, provide a fallback for basic display tasks and can even handle light gaming. The ECC memory support is a boon for long-running tasks where data integrity is critical. The balance of high-end CPU performance with a solid mid-to-high-end GPU makes this a versatile tool for a wide range of professionals.

Benchmark Performance

The combined performance of this system is strong, with a combined percentile of 82. The CPU's average benchmark score is 49796, placing it at the 90th percentile. Its closest rival is the Intel Core 9 273PE, with a deltaPct of -0.1%, meaning the AMD chip is essentially tied with it. It is also 0.8% faster than the Intel Core i5-14600KF and 1.2% faster than the AMD Ryzen 9 7900. In Cinebench R23, it scores 1960 in single-core and 18759 in multi-core. The single-core score is 298 in Cinebench R15, and the multi-core is 2872. PassMark results show a single-thread score of 4185 and a multithread score of 33486.

The GPU's average benchmark score is 27435, placing it at the 73rd percentile. It is perfectly matched with the AMD Radeon RX 6700 XT (deltaPct 0%) and is only 0.5% slower than the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3090. The PassMark G3D score is 19587, and the GPU compute score is 8399. The Geekbench OpenCL and Vulkan scores are 109197 and 108367, respectively.

The combined picture is a system with exceptional CPU performance that is matched with a very good, but not top-tier, GPU. The CPU clearly outperforms the GPU in terms of its percentile ranking. This indicates that in CPU-bound workloads, the system will perform at a level comparable to desktop workstations. In GPU-bound workloads like high-resolution gaming, the GPU will be the limiting factor. This is a good balance for creators who need CPU power for rendering and compiling, but also want to game, but it is not the ideal choice for someone whose primary focus is maximum gaming frame rates.

Usage Scenarios

High-refresh gaming: The RTX 4070 Mobile, with performance equivalent to a desktop RTX 3090, is well-suited for high-refresh 1080p gaming. For esports titles, frame rates can easily exceed 144 FPS at high settings. For AAA games, players can expect high frame rates at 1440p, though they may need to adjust settings to maintain a high refresh rate in the most demanding titles.

Streaming: The CPU's 8 cores and 16 threads, combined with a high PassMark multithread score of 33486, can handle game streaming and encoding without significant performance drops. The GPU's NVENC encoder, part of the Ada Lovelace architecture, offloads the encoding work from the CPU, ensuring smooth gameplay and a high-quality stream.

Video editing: This is a strong scenario for this system. The CPU's 18759 multi-core score in Cinebench R23 will handle 4K timeline scrubbing and export with ease. The GPU's CUDA cores and tensor cores can accelerate effects, rendering, and AI-driven tools. The 8 GB VRAM is sufficient for most editing projects, but may be a constraint for complex motion graphics or 3D elements.

3D rendering: The CPU will be a workhorse for CPU-based rendering. The high integer and floating-point math scores (109588 and 72722) will significantly reduce render times. For GPU rendering, the RTX 4070 Mobile with 36 RT cores will provide a substantial boost in ray-traced scenes. This system is a capable, if not top-tier, mobile rendering station.

Software development: The CPU is a developer's dream. The 8-core/16-thread configuration and high multithread score make code compilation and testing fast. The ECC memory support ensures data integrity during long builds. The high single-thread speed of 4185 ensures a responsive IDE, and the powerful cores can run multiple virtual machines or containers concurrently.

Student and office work: This system is overkill for basic tasks, but it is not a drawback. The snappy single-core performance and fast memory bandwidth make word processing, spreadsheets, and web browsing feel instant. The high multi-core performance means that a student can run a statistical analysis or a simulation without any lag. The system is a future-proof investment for a demanding academic or business career.

Gaming Performance

The FACT PACK contains no measured FPS data for this exact combination. Therefore, all frame rate figures below are estimated based on the benchmark scores. The GPU's average score is comparable to a desktop RTX 3090, while the CPU is a high-end mobile part. The following expectations are for games at ultra settings.

Cyberpunk 2077: At 1080p Ultra, an estimated 80-100 FPS is achievable. At 1440p Ultra, expect 50-70 FPS. With DLSS enabled, these numbers can increase significantly.
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare III: This is a well-optimized title. At 1080p Ultra, expect 140-180 FPS. At 1440p Ultra, expect 100-130 FPS.
Fortnite: Very high frame rates are possible. At 1080p Epic settings, expect 180-240 FPS. At 1440p, expect 130-160 FPS.
Red Dead Redemption 2: A demanding game. At 1080p Ultra, expect 90-110 FPS. At 1440p Ultra, expect 60-80 FPS.
Starfield: This game is particularly demanding on the CPU and GPU. At 1080p Ultra, expect 60-80 FPS. At 1440p Ultra, expect 45-60 FPS.
Counter-Strike 2: A CPU-bound title. The high single-core performance of the CPU will drive very high frame rates. At 1080p, expect 300+ FPS, and at 1440p, expect 250+ FPS.
Baldur's Gate 3: At 1080p Ultra, expect 120-150 FPS. At 1440p Ultra, expect 80-100 FPS.

These estimates assume a well-optimized system with sufficient cooling. The 8 GB VRAM is the most likely bottleneck at 1440p with ultra textures in the newest titles, and players may need to lower texture quality to avoid stuttering.

FAQ

Q: How does the CPU performance compare to a desktop processor?

A: The Ryzen AI Max+ 388 has an average benchmark score of 49796, which is essentially tied with the Intel Core 9 273PE (deltaPct -0.1%) and slightly faster than the Intel Core i5-14600KF (deltaPct 0.8%) and the AMD Ryzen 9 7900 (deltaPct 1.2%). This indicates it performs at the level of a high-end desktop processor from the previous generation.

Q: What is the GPU's performance equivalent to?

A: The RTX 4070 Mobile's average benchmark score is 27435, which is a 0% deltaPct compared to the AMD Radeon RX 6700 XT and -0.5% compared to the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3090. This means it offers performance on par with a desktop RTX 3090.

Q: Is the memory bandwidth sufficient for the CPU?

A: Yes, the CPU supports quad-channel LPDDR5X, providing a memory bandwidth of 256.0 GB/s. This is a very high figure for a mobile platform and is crucial for the CPU's performance in memory-intensive tasks and for the integrated Radeon 8060S graphics.

Q: Can this system do ray tracing?

A: Yes, the RTX 4070 Mobile is equipped with 36 RT cores based on the Ada Lovelace architecture. This provides hardware acceleration for ray-traced effects in games and rendering applications, significantly improving performance compared to non-RT hardware.

Q: What is the primary limitation of the GPU?

A: The primary limitation is its 8 GB of VRAM. While the bandwidth is 256.0 GB/s, the capacity may be insufficient for 4K gaming or very large 3D scenes with high-resolution textures, potentially causing performance drops or requiring lower settings.

Q: Is the CPU or GPU more powerful in this system?

A: The CPU is relatively more powerful. It sits in the 90th percentile of all CPUs, while the GPU is in the 73rd percentile. This means the CPU will be the dominant component in CPU-bound workloads, while the GPU will be the limiting factor in high-resolution gaming.

Q: What is the socket type, and can I upgrade the CPU later?

A: The CPU uses AMD Socket FP11, which is a mobile socket. This means the processor is soldered to the motherboard and is not upgradeable. The platform is a closed system, and the main upgrade path is storage and memory.

Balance and Bottleneck

The balance between the CPU and GPU is clearly skewed toward the CPU. The CPU's 90th percentile ranking versus the GPU's 73rd percentile shows that the processor is a much stronger component relative to its peers. In CPU-bound workloads, such as software compilation, video encoding, and 3D scene simulation, the system will perform exceptionally well, with the CPU being the clear driver of performance. The high multi-core scores (18759 in Cinebench R23) and the high PassMark math scores mean it will rarely be a bottleneck in these tasks.

In GPU-bound workloads, such as gaming at 1440p or 4K, the GPU will be the limiting factor. While the RTX 4070 Mobile is capable of matching a desktop RTX 3090, it is still a mobile chip with a 115 W TDP and 8 GB of VRAM. In games, the frame rate scaling will hit a ceiling determined by the GPU's fill rate and memory bandwidth. The CPU will be able to feed the GPU with frames easily, so the bottleneck will be the GPU's raw rendering power. This is a good balance for a creator who wants to play games, but it is not the ideal balance for a hardcore gamer who wants to maximize frame rates. The data suggests that in a gaming scenario, the RTX 4070 Mobile will be the component that determines the final performance, and its 8 GB VRAM is the most likely source of a bottleneck in the newest titles at high resolutions.

Rate My PC: AMD Ryzen AI Max+ 388 + NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Mobile

Apex Performer

System Balance Analysis

AMD Ryzen AI Max+ 388

NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Mobile

Market Position

Game Performance Benchmarks

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

Performance Insights

Optimal Performance

4K Gaming Ready

Performance Tiers Explained

Ultimate

High-End

Mid-Range

Entry Level

Legacy

CPU Analysis

GPU Analysis

Upgrade Path and Platform

Who Should Build It

Benchmark Performance

Usage Scenarios

Gaming Performance

FAQ

Balance and Bottleneck

4K Gaming Performance

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

1440p Gaming Performance

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

1080p Gaming Performance

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

Related Processors

Related Graphics Cards

Compare Your CPU

Compare Your GPU

Related PC Builds

Same CPU with Different GPUs

Same GPU with Different CPUs

Other Popular Builds