SYSTEM ANALYZER

Rate My PC: AMD Ryzen AI Max+ 388 + NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Mobile

Get a comprehensive performance analysis of your gaming rig with detailed benchmarks, bottleneck detection, and upgrade recommendations

Build Configuration

Select your components

PROCESSOR (CPU)

▼

GRAPHICS CARD (GPU)

▼

92 Score

Top 8% Ranking

92 / 100

ULTIMATE READY

Apex Performer

Top 8% of systems. Capable of 4K Ultra gaming and advanced rendering.

4K 60+ FPSVR ReadyRay Tracing

System Balance Analysis

CPU vs GPU performance ratio

Well Balanced

CPU

94%

GPU

91%

PROCESSOR

AMD Ryzen AI Max+ 388

49,796 Benchmark Score

Top 6% Market Ranking

View Full Specs →

GRAPHICS CARD

NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Mobile

19,049 Benchmark Score

Top 9% Market Ranking

View Full Specs →

Market Position

How your build compares to others

Budget

0-30

Mid-Range

30-60

High-End

60-85

Enthusiast

85-100

Your Build

Game Performance Benchmarks

Real-world 4K FPS in popular titles

View All Games →

Performance Insights

Tips to maximize your system

Optimal Performance

Your system is in the top tier. You can run any modern game at maximum settings.

4K Gaming Ready

Consider a 4K 144Hz monitor to fully utilize your hardware capabilities.

Compatible Games See what you can play Compare CPUs Find upgrades Compare GPUs Find upgrades

Performance Tiers Explained

90-100

Ultimate

4K Ultra gaming, VR ready, ray tracing enabled, professional workloads

4K 60+ FPS VR Ready

70-89

High-End

1440p Ultra or 4K High settings, excellent for modern AAA titles

1440p Ultra 4K High

50-69

Mid-Range

1080p Ultra or 1440p Medium, great value for most gamers

1080p Ultra 1440p Med

30-49

Entry Level

1080p Medium settings, suitable for eSports and older titles

1080p Med eSports

0-29

Legacy

Basic gaming, older titles, consider upgrading for modern games

720p-1080p Low Older Games

The AMD Ryzen AI Max+ 388 paired with the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Mobile represents a high-performance laptop configuration, with the CPU delivering top-tier multi-threaded results and the GPU providing solid 1080p-class performance. The combined system percentile of 77 indicates this pairing sits above the majority of all tested CPU and GPU combinations, though the discrepancy between the CPU’s 90th percentile ranking and the GPU’s 63rd percentile is the defining characteristic of this build.

CPU Analysis

The AMD Ryzen AI Max+ 388 is an 8-core, 16-thread processor built on the Zen 5 architecture, specifically from the Strix Halo codename family. It operates with a base clock of 3.60 GHz and a boost clock of 5.00 GHz, drawing a 55W TDP on the AMD Socket FP11 platform. The chip is manufactured on TSMC’s 4 nm process node, with a die size consisting of 2x 70.6 mm² chiplets. Cache configuration includes 80 KB of L1 per core, 1 MB of L2 per core, and 32 MB of shared L3 cache.

The benchmark results for this CPU are exceptionally strong. In Cinebench R23, the processor scores 18,759 points in multi-core and 1,960 points in single-core. These figures translate to a Passmark multithread score of 33,486 and a single-thread score of 4,185. The average benchmark score of 49,796 places the Ryzen AI Max+ 388 in the 90th percentile of all CPUs, meaning it outperforms roughly nine out of ten processors in the database.

The nearest rivals provide context for this performance. The Intel Core 9 273PE scores 49,845 on average, making the AMD chip 0.1% slower. The Intel Core i5-14600KF averages 49,394, which is 0.8% slower than the Ryzen. The AMD Ryzen 9 7900 averages 49,228, also 1.2% slower, and the AMD Ryzen 7 PRO 5755G averages 49,196, another 1.2% behind. This clustering indicates the Ryzen AI Max+ 388 is essentially performance-equivalent to a range of high-end desktop and mobile processors, despite being a mobile-class chip.

For real workloads, the multi-core scores suggest strong performance in video encoding, 3D rendering, and compilation tasks. The Cinebench R23 multi-core score of 18,759 indicates sustained throughput that can handle heavy parallel workloads. The single-core score of 1,960 in Cinebench R23 is equally important for everyday responsiveness and lightly-threaded applications. The Passmark data compression score of 400,887 and encryption score of 20,092 further indicate strong performance in data-intensive tasks.

The memory subsystem is notable, with support for LPDDR5X over a quad-channel bus, delivering 256.0 GB/s of bandwidth. This is a high-bandwidth configuration that supports the CPU’s integrated Radeon 8060S graphics, though the discrete RTX 4050 Mobile will be the primary GPU. ECC memory support is included, which is unusual for a mobile processor and suggests potential workstation applicability.

Benchmark Performance

The CPU’s benchmark performance is exceptional, while the GPU’s is more moderate. The Ryzen AI Max+ 388 achieves an average benchmark score of 49,796, placing it in the 90th percentile of all CPUs. The nearest rival, Intel Core 9 273PE, is essentially tied at 49,845 (0.1% faster), while the Intel Core i5-14600KF is 0.8% slower at 49,394. The AMD Ryzen 9 7900 trails by 1.2% at 49,228, and the AMD Ryzen 7 PRO 5755G is also 1.2% behind at 49,196.

The NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Mobile presents a different picture. Its average benchmark score is 19,049, placing it in the 63rd percentile of all GPUs. The nearest rivals are the AMD Radeon RX 6600 at 19,036 (0.1% slower), the NVIDIA Quadro K6000 at 19,030 (0.1% slower), the NVIDIA Tesla K20m at 19,089 (0.2% faster), and the NVIDIA RTX 2000 Ada Generation at 18,954 (0.5% slower). This places the RTX 4050 Mobile in a performance band roughly equivalent to desktop GPUs from several generations ago.

Specific GPU benchmark scores include a Passmark G3D score of 14,423, a Geekbench OpenCL score of 74,748, and a Geekbench Vulkan score of 75,235. The GPU compute score from Passmark is 5,947. These figures indicate the RTX 4050 Mobile is capable for 1080p gaming and light content creation but is not a high-end performer.

The combined percentile for this CPU+GPU pairing is 77, which reflects the strong CPU contribution offset by the more modest GPU. The data shows a clear imbalance: the CPU is in the top 10% of all processors, while the GPU sits in the upper-middle tier. For workloads that depend heavily on the CPU, this system will perform at near-flagship levels. For GPU-bound tasks, performance will be more typical of a mid-range laptop.

Balance and Bottleneck

The performance data reveals a significant imbalance between CPU and GPU capabilities. The CPU’s 90th percentile ranking versus the GPU’s 63rd percentile means that in most gaming and graphics workloads, the RTX 4050 Mobile will be the limiting factor. The CPU has far more headroom than the GPU can utilize in frame rate generation.

For CPU-intensive workloads such as video encoding, software compilation, and multi-threaded productivity, the Ryzen AI Max+ 388 will deliver near-desktop-class performance. The Cinebench R23 multi-core score of 18,759 and Passmark multithread score of 33,486 demonstrate this capability. In these scenarios, the GPU is largely irrelevant, and the CPU performs at its 90th percentile level.

For gaming, the bottleneck is clearly the GPU. The RTX 4050 Mobile’s 63rd percentile ranking, with a Passmark G3D score of 14,423, means frame rates will be capped by the GPU’s rendering throughput. The CPU’s strong single-thread performance, evidenced by the 4,185 Passmark single-thread score and 1,960 Cinebench R23 single-core score, will not be the limiting factor even at high frame rates in most titles. The GPU will saturate before the CPU does in typical gaming scenarios.

This imbalance is not necessarily a flaw. For users who primarily run productivity applications with occasional gaming, the strong CPU is an asset. For users seeking maximum gaming frame rates, the GPU will hold back the system’s potential. The data suggests that in mixed workloads, the CPU will often be waiting on the GPU, but in pure CPU tasks, the system performs at a top-tier level.

Who Should Build It

This configuration targets users who need substantial CPU performance in a laptop form factor, with gaming as a secondary rather than primary use case. The 90th percentile CPU ranking makes this system suitable for content creators who edit video, render 3D scenes, or process large datasets. The Cinebench R23 multi-core score of 18,759 indicates the ability to handle long render times efficiently.

Software developers will benefit from the CPU’s strong multi-threaded performance for compilation and testing. The Passmark integer math score of 109,588 and floating point math score of 72,722 support this use case. The 16 threads allow for parallel builds and virtual machine workloads.

Students and small business users who run heavy office applications, spreadsheets with large datasets, or data analysis tools will find the CPU performance more than adequate. The Passmark data compression score of 400,887 and random string sorting score of 43,196 indicate fast data manipulation.

Gamers at 1080p resolution will find the RTX 4050 Mobile sufficient for most titles at medium to high settings, but the GPU’s 63rd percentile ranking means it is not a high-refresh-rate champion. Users seeking maximum frame rates should look at systems with higher-tier GPUs, while accepting that the CPU will be underutilized in those scenarios.

Gaming Performance

No measured FPS data exists for this exact CPU+GPU combination. The FACT PACK contains no measuredFps rows, so all frame rate figures presented here are estimates derived from the benchmark scores. The GPU’s Passmark G3D score of 14,423 and its 63rd percentile ranking suggest this system is capable of 1080p gaming at moderate settings.

Based on the benchmark scores, the RTX 4050 Mobile is likely to deliver playable frame rates at 1080p with medium to high settings in most modern titles, but will struggle with ultra settings in demanding games. The GPU’s 6 GB of VRAM and 192.0 GB/s bandwidth may become limiting factors in texture-heavy scenes. The CPU’s strong single-thread performance will ensure consistent frame delivery without stutter in CPU-bound scenarios.

The Geekbench Vulkan score of 75,235 indicates solid API-level performance, while the DirectX 12 Passmark score of 61 suggests modern API utilization is adequate but not exceptional. Users should expect a smooth experience at 1080p for esports titles and older games, with reduced settings required for the latest AAA releases. These are estimates only, as no measured FPS data is available for this specific pairing.

FAQ

Q: What is the CPU’s percentile ranking among all processors?

A: The AMD Ryzen AI Max+ 388 ranks in the 90th percentile of all CPUs, with an average benchmark score of 49,796.

Q: How does the RTX 4050 Mobile compare to its nearest rival, the AMD Radeon RX 6600?

A: The RTX 4050 Mobile averages 19,049, which is 0.1% faster than the AMD Radeon RX 6600’s average score of 19,036.

Q: What is the combined percentile for this CPU+GPU pairing?

A: The combined percentile is 77, reflecting the CPU’s strong 90th percentile against the GPU’s more moderate 63rd percentile.

Q: Does this system support ECC memory?

A: Yes, the CPU supports ECC memory, which is a feature more common in workstation-class processors.

Q: What is the GPU’s memory configuration?

A: The RTX 4050 Mobile has 6 GB of GDDR6 memory on a 96-bit bus, providing 192.0 GB/s of bandwidth.

Q: How does the CPU compare to the Intel Core i5-14600KF?

A: The Ryzen AI Max+ 388 has an average score of 49,796, which is 0.8% faster than the Intel Core i5-14600KF’s average of 49,394.

Q: What is the CPU’s boost clock speed?

A: The boost clock is 5.00 GHz, with a base clock of 3.60 GHz.

GPU Analysis

The NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Mobile is built on the Ada Lovelace architecture, using the AD107 chip manufactured on TSMC’s 5 nm process. The chip contains 18,900 million transistors on a 159 mm² die. The GPU has 2,560 shading units, 80 texture mapping units, and 48 raster operation units. Ray tracing is handled by 20 RT cores, and AI workloads are accelerated by 80 tensor cores.

Clock speeds are 1,455 MHz base and 1,755 MHz boost, with memory running at 2000 MHz (16 Gbps effective). The 6 GB of GDDR6 memory is configured on a 96-bit bus, delivering 192.0 GB/s of bandwidth. The GPU’s TDP is 50 W, and it connects via PCIe 4.0 x8. Pixel rate is 84.24 GPixel/s, and texture rate is 140.4 GTexel/s. FP32 performance is 8.986 TFLOPS, with FP16 at the same 8.986 TFLOPS (1:1 ratio).

Benchmark results show the GPU’s Passmark G3D score of 14,423 and a 63rd percentile ranking among all GPUs. The Geekbench OpenCL score of 74,748 and Vulkan score of 75,235 indicate solid compute performance. The average benchmark score of 19,049 places it within 0.5% of the NVIDIA RTX 2000 Ada Generation and the AMD Radeon RX 6600.

For rendering workloads, the 20 RT cores provide hardware-accelerated ray tracing, which is beneficial for 3D rendering in compatible applications. The 80 tensor cores enable DLSS and AI-accelerated features. However, the 6 GB VRAM capacity may be a limitation for large 3D scenes or high-resolution textures. The 192.0 GB/s bandwidth is sufficient for 1080p gaming but may bottleneck at higher resolutions or with heavy texture streaming.

The GPU’s API support includes DirectX 12 Ultimate (12_2), OpenGL 4.6, and Vulkan 1.4. The 50 W TDP is modest, meaning it fits in thin-and-light laptops without excessive cooling requirements. The Passmark GPU compute score of 5,947 indicates moderate compute throughput, suitable for light productivity tasks but not for heavy GPU compute workloads.

Build Overview

This is a laptop-class build combining the AMD Ryzen AI Max+ 388 processor with the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Mobile GPU. The CPU is an 8-core, 16-thread Zen 5 processor with a 90th percentile ranking, while the GPU is an Ada Lovelace-based mobile chip with a 63rd percentile ranking. The combined system percentile is 77, placing this configuration above the majority of tested systems.

The CPU’s specifications include a 5.00 GHz boost clock, 32 MB of L3 cache, and quad-channel LPDDR5X memory support providing 256.0 GB/s of bandwidth. The GPU offers 6 GB of GDDR6 memory, 2,560 shading units, and 20 RT cores. This pairing is designed for users who prioritize CPU performance while maintaining a reasonably capable GPU for gaming and light graphics work.

The 77th combined percentile indicates this system outperforms most laptops in the database, with the CPU being the primary driver of that performance. The GPU’s 63rd percentile is respectable but not exceptional. This is a balanced system skewed toward productivity and CPU-intensive tasks, with gaming performance that is adequate for 1080p play.

Usage Scenarios

High-refresh gaming: The RTX 4050 Mobile’s 63rd percentile ranking and Passmark G3D score of 14,423 suggest 1080p gaming at medium-high settings is achievable, but high-refresh-rate (144Hz+) monitors will only be fully utilized in less demanding titles. The CPU’s strong single-thread performance will not limit frame rates, but the GPU will cap performance in most games.

Streaming: The CPU’s 8 cores and 16 threads, combined with the 90th percentile ranking, provide ample headroom for encoding and streaming simultaneously. The Passmark multithread score of 33,486 indicates the CPU can handle game capture and encoding without significant impact on game performance, though the GPU’s NVENC encoder is also available for hardware encoding.

Video editing: The Cinebench R23 multi-core score of 18,759 supports efficient video editing and rendering. The CPU’s high single-thread score of 4,185 in Passmark helps with timeline scrubbing and effects preview. The GPU’s 6 GB VRAM and tensor cores assist with AI-accelerated effects, though larger projects may exceed VRAM capacity.

3D rendering: The CPU’s 90th percentile multi-threaded performance makes it suitable for CPU-based rendering engines. The Cinebench R23 score of 18,759 indicates this system can handle complex scenes. The GPU’s 20 RT cores provide hardware ray tracing acceleration for GPU-rendered scenes, though the 6 GB VRAM limits scene complexity.

Software development: The 16 threads and strong integer math score of 109,588 make this system well-suited for compilation and testing. The 256.0 GB/s memory bandwidth supports large build caches and virtual machine workloads. The CPU’s 90th percentile ranking ensures fast build times across most projects.

Student and office work: The CPU’s single-thread performance of 4,185 in Passmark ensures responsive everyday computing. The data compression score of 400,887 supports fast file archival and large spreadsheet operations. The 55W CPU TDP and 50W GPU TDP indicate this system can operate within reasonable power budgets for a laptop.

Rate My PC: AMD Ryzen AI Max+ 388 + NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Mobile

Apex Performer

System Balance Analysis

AMD Ryzen AI Max+ 388

NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Mobile

Market Position

Game Performance Benchmarks

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

Performance Insights

Optimal Performance

4K Gaming Ready

Performance Tiers Explained

Ultimate

High-End

Mid-Range

Entry Level

Legacy

CPU Analysis

Benchmark Performance

Balance and Bottleneck

Who Should Build It

Gaming Performance

FAQ

GPU Analysis

Build Overview

Usage Scenarios

4K Gaming Performance

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

1440p Gaming Performance

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

1080p Gaming Performance

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

Related Processors

Related Graphics Cards

Compare Your CPU

Compare Your GPU

Related PC Builds

Same CPU with Different GPUs

Same GPU with Different CPUs

Other Popular Builds