SYSTEM ANALYZER

Rate My PC: AMD Ryzen AI Max+ 388 + AMD Radeon 740M

Get a comprehensive performance analysis of your gaming rig with detailed benchmarks, bottleneck detection, and upgrade recommendations

Build Configuration

Select your components

PROCESSOR (CPU)

▼

GRAPHICS CARD (GPU)

▼

91 Score

Top 9% Ranking

91 / 100

ULTIMATE READY

Apex Performer

Top 9% of systems. Capable of 4K Ultra gaming and advanced rendering.

4K 60+ FPSVR ReadyRay Tracing

System Balance Analysis

CPU vs GPU performance ratio

Well Balanced

CPU

94%

GPU

88%

PROCESSOR

AMD Ryzen AI Max+ 388

49,796 Benchmark Score

Top 6% Market Ranking

View Full Specs →

GRAPHICS CARD

AMD Radeon 740M

12,870 Benchmark Score

Top 12% Market Ranking

View Full Specs →

Market Position

How your build compares to others

Budget

0-30

Mid-Range

30-60

High-End

60-85

Enthusiast

85-100

Your Build

Game Performance Benchmarks

Real-world 4K FPS in popular titles

View All Games →

Performance Insights

Tips to maximize your system

Optimal Performance

Your system is in the top tier. You can run any modern game at maximum settings.

4K Gaming Ready

Consider a 4K 144Hz monitor to fully utilize your hardware capabilities.

Compatible Games See what you can play Compare CPUs Find upgrades Compare GPUs Find upgrades

Performance Tiers Explained

90-100

Ultimate

4K Ultra gaming, VR ready, ray tracing enabled, professional workloads

4K 60+ FPS VR Ready

70-89

High-End

1440p Ultra or 4K High settings, excellent for modern AAA titles

1440p Ultra 4K High

50-69

Mid-Range

1080p Ultra or 1440p Medium, great value for most gamers

1080p Ultra 1440p Med

30-49

Entry Level

1080p Medium settings, suitable for eSports and older titles

1080p Med eSports

0-29

Legacy

Basic gaming, older titles, consider upgrading for modern games

720p-1080p Low Older Games

The AMD Ryzen AI Max+ 388 is an 8-core, 16-thread mobile processor built on the Zen 5 architecture, specifically the Strix Halo codename, manufactured on TSMC's 4 nm process node. It operates with a base clock of 3.60 GHz and a boost clock of 5.00 GHz, drawing a 55 W TDP. The chip features a substantial cache hierarchy, including 80 KB of L1 per core, 1 MB of L2 per core, and a shared 32 MB of L3 cache. This is a laptop-class part, indicated by its AMD Socket FP11 and mobile market segment, and it supports quad-channel LPDDR5X memory with a total bandwidth of 256.0 GB/s, along with ECC memory support. The processor also integrates a Radeon 8060S graphics solution, though the benchmark data for this page is centered on the separate AMD Radeon 740M GPU.

The benchmark scores for the CPU paint a picture of a very capable mobile processor. In Cinebench R23, it scores 18759 points in multi-core and 1960 points in single-core tests. This multi-core performance places it in the 90th percentile of all CPUs, meaning it outperforms the vast majority of processors on the market. Its average benchmark score of 49796 puts it in a tight race with several desktop-class rivals; it is a mere 0.1% behind the Intel Core 9 273PE, 0.8% ahead of the Intel Core i5-14600KF, and 1.2% ahead of both the AMD Ryzen 9 7900 and the AMD Ryzen 7 PRO 5755G. This indicates that despite being a mobile chip, its raw multi-threaded output is directly comparable to high-end desktop processors, making it an exceptional choice for heavy productivity workloads on the go.

CPU Analysis

The Ryzen AI Max+ 388's architecture is built around 8 physical cores based on the Zen 5 microarchitecture, capable of handling 16 threads simultaneously. The combination of a 3.60 GHz base and 5.00 GHz boost clock allows for strong single-threaded responsiveness when needed, while the generous 32 MB of shared L3 cache helps feed the cores in multi-threaded tasks. The 4 nm process node from TSMC contributes to its efficiency, allowing it to reach these performance levels within a 55 W TDP envelope. For real-world workloads, the Cinebench R23 multi-core score of 18759 is a strong indicator of heavy lifting capability in tasks like video rendering, 3D modeling, and software compilation, where the 16 threads can be fully utilized.

Single-threaded performance, as measured by the Cinebench R23 score of 1960 and the Passmark single-thread score of 4185, is equally impressive. This ensures that everyday tasks such as web browsing, document editing, and general system navigation feel snappy and responsive. In the Passmark suite, the CPU shows specific strengths: its data compression score of 400887 is extraordinarily high, and integer math performance of 109588 points suggests robust handling of logical operations. The floating-point math score of 72722 further supports its capability in scientific and engineering applications. The 90th percentile ranking among all CPUs solidifies its position as a top-tier mobile processor, and the direct rivalry with desktop chips like the Core i5-14600KF and Ryzen 9 7900 in average score underscores that this is not a typical low-power laptop part, but rather a high-performance computing solution.

FAQ

Q: How many cores and threads does the AMD Ryzen AI Max+ 388 have?

A: It has 8 physical cores and 16 threads, which allows it to process 16 tasks simultaneously for multi-threaded workloads.

Q: What is the performance difference between this CPU and the Intel Core i5-14600KF?

A: The Ryzen AI Max+ 388 has an average benchmark score of 49796, which is 0.8% higher than the Intel Core i5-14600KF's score of 49394, making it a very close competitor.

Q: What is the boost clock speed of this processor?

A: The maximum boost clock speed is 5.00 GHz, which is used for demanding single-threaded tasks to increase responsiveness.

Q: What type of memory does this CPU support?

A: It supports LPDDR5X memory via a quad-channel interface, providing a total memory bandwidth of 256.0 GB/s.

Q: Does this CPU have integrated graphics?

A: Yes, it integrates a Radeon 8060S GPU, although the separate AMD Radeon 740M is the focus of the benchmark data on this page.

Q: What is the TDP of this processor?

A: The thermal design power (TDP) is rated at 55 W, which is a measure of the cooling solution required and typical power draw under load.

Q: What socket does this CPU use?

A: It uses the AMD Socket FP11, which is a mobile-specific socket, confirming its intended use in laptops.

Benchmark Performance

The combined performance picture for the AMD Ryzen AI Max+ 388 and AMD Radeon 740M pairing is defined by a strong CPU and a mid-range iGPU. The CPU's average benchmark score of 49796 places it in the 90th percentile of all CPUs, a dominant position. It sits in a very tight cluster with its nearest rivals: the Intel Core 9 273PE (49845, -0.1%), Intel Core i5-14600KF (49394, 0.8%), AMD Ryzen 9 7900 (49228, 1.2%), and AMD Ryzen 7 PRO 5755G (49196, 1.2%). This shows that in pure processing power, the Ryzen AI Max+ 388 is indistinguishable from these top-tier desktop processors, making it a powerhouse for a laptop.

The AMD Radeon 740M, however, tells a different story. With an average benchmark score of 12870, it sits in the 53rd percentile of all GPUs, which is essentially the middle of the pack. Its Geekbench scores are 10172 for OpenCL and 15568 for Vulkan. Its nearest rivals in terms of average score include the AMD FirePro W5100 (12847, 0.2%), AMD Radeon Pro 455 (12831, 0.3%), and NVIDIA GeForce GTX 590 (12830, 0.3%), while it trails the AMD Radeon RX 580 by 0.4%. This places its raw compute performance on par with older discrete desktop GPUs, which is respectable for an integrated solution but far from the CPU's elite status. The combined percentile for this build is 72, reflecting the significant gap between the CPU's high-end capability and the GPU's mid-range standing.

Gaming Performance

There is no measured FPS data available for this exact CPU and GPU combination, as the FACT PACK contains no measuredFps rows. Consequently, all frame rate expectations for gaming are estimates based on the benchmark scores of the components.

Based on the GPU's benchmark performance, the Radeon 740M is positioned as a capable entry-level to mid-range graphics solution. Its average score of 12870 and 53rd percentile ranking suggest it can handle esports titles and older games reasonably well at lower resolutions and settings. The Geekbench Vulkan score of 15568 indicates a solid foundation for modern graphics APIs. However, for demanding AAA titles, the GPU is likely to be a limiting factor, requiring users to lower graphical settings and resolution to achieve playable frame rates. The CPU's high performance ensures that it will not be a bottleneck in gaming, providing more than enough horsepower to feed the GPU, but the overall gaming experience will be defined by the Radeon 740M's capabilities. Expect smooth performance in light and competitive games, but for the latest graphically intensive releases, the Radeon 740M will require significant graphical compromises.

Usage Scenarios

High-Refresh Gaming: This is a challenging scenario for this build. The Radeon 740M's 53rd percentile ranking and performance on par with older discrete GPUs like the GTX 590 suggest it will struggle to drive high refresh rates at 1080p in demanding titles. For esports games like CS or Valorant, it may be possible to achieve high frame rates at lower settings, but for modern AAA games, the GPU will be the limiting factor, making high-refresh gaming a difficult prospect.

Streaming: The CPU is exceptionally well-suited for streaming. With a multi-core score of 18759 in Cinebench R23 and a 90th percentile ranking, it has ample headroom to handle game encoding and streaming software simultaneously without significant performance degradation. The high Passmark data compression score of 400887 also indicates strong real-time encoding capabilities, making this a superb processor for content creators who want to stream from a laptop.

Video Editing: This is a core strength of this platform. Video editing software heavily utilizes both multi-core CPUs and GPU acceleration. The CPU's 16 threads and high multi-core performance will handle timeline editing, rendering, and exporting with ease, rivaling desktop processors like the Ryzen 9 7900. The Radeon 740M can assist with effects and previews, but the CPU will be the primary workhorse, ensuring a fluid and fast editing experience.

3D Rendering: Similar to video editing, 3D rendering is a CPU-intensive task that this processor excels at. Its Cinebench R23 multi-core score of 18759 demonstrates its capability to render complex scenes and models efficiently. The high floating-point math score of 72722 further supports its proficiency in 3D calculations. The GPU's contribution will be minimal for CPU-based renderers, but its 2.867 TFLOPS of FP32 performance can help with viewport navigation and real-time previews.

Software Development: The Ryzen AI Max+ 388 is an excellent choice for developers. Compilation tasks are highly parallel, and the 16 threads and high integer math score of 109588 will significantly speed up build times. The fast 256.0 GB/s memory bandwidth also helps with large codebases and running virtual machines. The processor's high single-thread performance ensures a responsive IDE, making for a very productive development environment.

Student and Office Work: For standard productivity tasks like word processing, spreadsheets, web browsing, and email, this CPU is overkill, but it provides a future-proof and exceptionally smooth experience. The high single-core score of 4185 in Passmark ensures that applications launch and respond instantly. The integrated Radeon 8060S is more than sufficient for everyday 2D graphics and video playback, making this a premium, albeit powerful, choice for academic and office settings.

Upgrade Path and Platform

The AMD Ryzen AI Max+ 388 is built for the AMD Socket FP11, which is a mobile platform, meaning the CPU is not upgradeable in the traditional sense; it is soldered to the motherboard. The platform supports LPDDR5X memory in a quad-channel configuration, providing 256.0 GB/s of bandwidth, which is a significant advantage for integrated graphics and memory-intensive tasks. The CPU provides 16 PCIe Gen 4 lanes, which are typically used for connecting the primary NVMe SSD and potentially an external GPU enclosure. The Radeon 740M GPU, in this configuration, is an integrated part of the system-on-chip (or a separate IGP die), drawing up to 45 W, and uses "System Shared" memory, meaning it has no dedicated VRAM and relies on the fast system memory.

Given that this is a laptop platform, a "sensible next upgrade" does not involve swapping the CPU or GPU. Instead, the primary upgrade paths are increasing system memory (LPDDR5X) and storage capacity (via PCIe Gen 4 NVMe drives). The platform's 55 W CPU TDP and 45 W GPU TDP suggest a combined thermal design that is manageable for a high-performance laptop cooling solution. The PCIe 4.0 x8 interface for the GPU, while shared with the system, is more than adequate for its bandwidth requirements. For a user looking to maximize performance, ensuring the laptop has sufficient RAM (ideally in a dual or quad-channel configuration) to feed both the CPU and the iGPU is the most critical factor.

Balance and Bottleneck

This system exhibits a clear imbalance where the CPU vastly outperforms the GPU. The CPU sits in the 90th percentile of all CPUs, while the GPU is in the 53rd percentile. In CPU-bound workloads, such as video encoding, 3D rendering, and software compilation, the system will perform exceptionally well, with the Ryzen AI Max+ 388 delivering desktop-class speed. The bottleneck in these scenarios is virtually non-existent; the CPU is the star player, and the GPU's role is secondary.

However, in GPU-bound workloads, particularly gaming, the Radeon 740M becomes the limiting factor. The CPU's immense processing power cannot compensate for the GPU's mid-range performance. In gaming, the CPU will likely be waiting for the GPU to render frames, meaning the frame rates will be defined by the Radeon 740M's capabilities, not the CPU's. The FPS scaling in games will be limited by the GPU's 2.867 TFLOPS of FP32 performance and its 53rd percentile ranking. This is a classic case of a powerful CPU paired with a modest GPU, creating a system that is a productivity monster but only a casual gaming device. For tasks that leverage the GPU, like machine learning inference or GPU-accelerated rendering, the Radeon 740M will be the primary bottleneck, holding back the system's full potential.

Build Overview

This build pairs the AMD Ryzen AI Max+ 388 CPU with the AMD Radeon 740M GPU in a laptop form factor. The build class is explicitly "laptop," confirming this is a mobile solution. The combined percentile for this pairing is 72, which places it in the upper echelon of all systems, though this is heavily skewed by the CPU's outstanding performance. The overall tier is a high-performance mobile workstation with a significant caveat on graphics. The CPU is a top-tier part, comparable to high-end desktop processors, while the GPU is a mid-range integrated solution. This is not a gaming laptop in the high-end sense, but rather a professional laptop for creators, developers, and power users who need exceptional CPU compute power and are willing to accept modest graphics performance for gaming or light GPU tasks.

Who Should Build It

This laptop configuration is ideally suited for professionals and power users who prioritize CPU performance above all else. Content creators who edit high-resolution video or render 3D scenes will find the 16-thread CPU and its 18759 Cinebench R23 multi-core score to be a massive asset, allowing them to work on complex projects from anywhere. Software developers will benefit from the fast compilation speeds enabled by the high integer math score of 109588 and the 16 threads, making large codebase builds significantly faster. Data scientists and researchers working with large datasets will appreciate the 256.0 GB/s memory bandwidth and strong floating-point math performance for their computations. Students and professionals in engineering or scientific fields who run CPU-intensive simulations and analyses will find this laptop to be a powerful and portable workstation. For gamers, this is not the primary target, as the Radeon 740M is only suited for light or esports gaming at lower settings. However, for a user who needs a laptop that excels in professional productivity tasks and can handle casual gaming on the side, this pairing offers an exceptional balance, provided the graphics expectations are kept in check.

Rate My PC: AMD Ryzen AI Max+ 388 + AMD Radeon 740M

Apex Performer

System Balance Analysis

AMD Ryzen AI Max+ 388

AMD Radeon 740M

Market Position

Game Performance Benchmarks

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

Performance Insights

Optimal Performance

4K Gaming Ready

Performance Tiers Explained

Ultimate

High-End

Mid-Range

Entry Level

Legacy

CPU Analysis

FAQ

Benchmark Performance

Gaming Performance

Usage Scenarios

Upgrade Path and Platform

Balance and Bottleneck

Build Overview

Who Should Build It

4K Gaming Performance

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

1440p Gaming Performance

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

1080p Gaming Performance

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

Related Processors

Related Graphics Cards

Compare Your CPU

Compare Your GPU

Related PC Builds

Same CPU with Different GPUs

Same GPU with Different CPUs

Other Popular Builds