SYSTEM ANALYZER

Rate My PC: AMD Ryzen AI Max 385 + NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Mobile

Get a comprehensive performance analysis of your gaming rig with detailed benchmarks, bottleneck detection, and upgrade recommendations

Build Configuration

Select your components

PROCESSOR (CPU)

▼

GRAPHICS CARD (GPU)

▼

92 Score

Top 8% Ranking

92 / 100

ULTIMATE READY

Apex Performer

Top 8% of systems. Capable of 4K Ultra gaming and advanced rendering.

4K 60+ FPSVR ReadyRay Tracing

System Balance Analysis

CPU vs GPU performance ratio

Well Balanced

CPU

93%

GPU

92%

PROCESSOR

AMD Ryzen AI Max 385

44,309 Benchmark Score

Top 7% Market Ranking

View Full Specs →

GRAPHICS CARD

NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Mobile

22,729 Benchmark Score

Top 8% Market Ranking

View Full Specs →

Market Position

How your build compares to others

Budget

0-30

Mid-Range

30-60

High-End

60-85

Enthusiast

85-100

Your Build

Game Performance Benchmarks

Real-world 4K FPS in popular titles

View All Games →

Performance Insights

Tips to maximize your system

Optimal Performance

Your system is in the top tier. You can run any modern game at maximum settings.

4K Gaming Ready

Consider a 4K 144Hz monitor to fully utilize your hardware capabilities.

Compatible Games See what you can play Compare CPUs Find upgrades Compare GPUs Find upgrades

Performance Tiers Explained

90-100

Ultimate

4K Ultra gaming, VR ready, ray tracing enabled, professional workloads

4K 60+ FPS VR Ready

70-89

High-End

1440p Ultra or 4K High settings, excellent for modern AAA titles

1440p Ultra 4K High

50-69

Mid-Range

1080p Ultra or 1440p Medium, great value for most gamers

1080p Ultra 1440p Med

30-49

Entry Level

1080p Medium settings, suitable for eSports and older titles

1080p Med eSports

0-29

Legacy

Basic gaming, older titles, consider upgrading for modern games

720p-1080p Low Older Games

The AMD Ryzen AI Max 385 and NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Mobile form a compelling laptop combination, pairing a high-end mobile CPU with a capable mainstream GPU. This analysis draws exclusively from benchmark data to assess the platform's strengths, weaknesses, and ideal use cases. The CPU sits in the 88th percentile among all processors, while the GPU holds the 67th percentile among all graphics cards, resulting in a combined percentile of 78. It is important to note that no measured FPS data exists for this exact pairing; all gaming performance discussions are estimates derived from the individual component benchmark scores.

GPU Analysis — VRAM, bandwidth, clocks, RT/tensor hardware, what the benchmark scores mean for rendering

The NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Mobile is built on the Ada Lovelace architecture using TSMC's 5 nm process, with a die size of 159 mm² containing 18,900 million transistors. The GPU operates at a base clock of 1545 MHz and a boost clock of 1890 MHz, with memory running at 2000 MHz (16 Gbps effective). It is equipped with 8 GB of GDDR6 memory on a 128-bit bus, delivering a memory bandwidth of 256.0 GB/s. This bandwidth figure is identical to the CPU's system memory bandwidth, which suggests a balanced design for data transfer between the CPU and GPU.

The GPU's compute resources include 3072 shading units, 96 texture mapping units, and 48 raster operations pipelines. For ray tracing, it features 24 dedicated RT cores, and for AI acceleration, it includes 96 tensor cores. The pixel rate is 90.72 GPixel/s, and the texture rate is 181.4 GTexel/s. Raw compute performance is rated at 11.61 TFLOPS for both FP32 and FP16 operations, indicating a 1:1 ratio that is typical of Ada Lovelace consumer GPUs.

Benchmark results provide a clear picture of the GPU's capabilities. In Geekbench, it scores 89420 in OpenCL and 89569 in Vulkan, showing strong compute performance across different APIs. More telling are the PassMark results: the G3D score is 17469, while the G2D score is 730. The GPU compute score is 6816. In DirectX tests, it scores 107 in DX10, 157 in DX11, and 73 in DX12. The relatively lower DX12 score compared to DX11 may reflect driver optimization or architectural nuances, but the overall G3D score places the GPU in the 67th percentile.

Compared to its nearest rivals, the RTX 4060 Mobile is remarkably competitive. It trails the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 by just 0.7%, with average scores of 22729 versus 22895. It leads the AMD Radeon RX 7700 XT by 0.8% (22549) and the Intel Arc B580 by 1.3% (23021). Most notably, it edges out the newer NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5060 Mobile by 1.3% (22435). This indicates that the RTX 4060 Mobile holds its own against both previous-generation desktop cards and newer mobile offerings.

For rendering workloads, the combination of 8 GB VRAM and 256.0 GB/s bandwidth is adequate for 1080p and moderate 1440p content creation. The 24 RT cores enable hardware-accelerated ray tracing, which will improve lighting and shadow quality in compatible applications. The 96 tensor cores support DLSS and other AI-based features, which can significantly boost frame rates in games that support them. The pixel rate of 90.72 GPixel/s is sufficient for high-resolution rendering, though the 128-bit memory bus may become a limiting factor in memory-intensive scenes.

Benchmark Performance — exact CPU and GPU scores, percentile positions, and what the combined picture is

The CPU benchmark scores are substantial. In Cinebench, the Ryzen AI Max 385 scores 1579 in R15 multicore and 222 in R15 singlecore. Moving to R20, it achieves 6583 multicore and 929 singlecore. In R23, the most demanding Cinebench test, it scores 15674 multicore and 2212 singlecore. These results indicate strong multithreaded performance for a mobile processor.

PassMark results further underscore the CPU's capabilities. The multithread score is 33705, with a single-thread score of 4060. Integer math scores 107046, floating-point math scores 71105, and extended instructions score 33873. Data compression scores 406505, while data encryption scores 19926. The find prime numbers test scores 165, and random string sorting scores 43725. Physics simulation scores 1889. The average benchmark score across all tests is 44309, placing the CPU in the 88th percentile.

The GPU's average benchmark score is 22729, placing it in the 67th percentile. The combined percentile for the platform is 78, reflecting the CPU's stronger relative position. The CPU's nearest rivals provide context: it trails the Intel Core i9-13950HX by just 0.1% (44342 vs 44309), leads the Intel Core i5-13600 by 0.2% (44240), trails the Intel Core Ultra X9 388H by 0.4% (44466), and trails the AMD Ryzen 5 7500X3D by 0.6% (44573). This places the Ryzen AI Max 385 within 1% of a wide range of desktop and mobile processors.

The combined picture shows a platform where the CPU is significantly stronger relative to its peers than the GPU. The CPU's 88th percentile ranking is exceptional, while the GPU's 67th percentile is good but not outstanding. This suggests that the CPU will rarely be the bottleneck in any workload, and the GPU will determine the ceiling for graphics-intensive tasks. For productivity and compute-heavy applications, this platform will excel; for gaming, it will deliver solid but not class-leading performance.

CPU Analysis — cores, clocks, architecture, what the benchmark scores mean for real workloads

The AMD Ryzen AI Max 385 is an 8-core, 16-thread processor based on the Zen 5 architecture, codenamed Strix Halo. It is manufactured on TSMC's 4 nm process, with a die size of 2x 70.6 mm². The base clock is 3.60 GHz, and the boost clock reaches 5.00 GHz. The thermal design power (TDP) is 55 W, which is moderate for a mobile processor with this level of performance. The CPU is not multiplier unlocked, so overclocking is not supported.

Cache hierarchy is generous: 80 KB of L1 cache per core, 1 MB of L2 cache per core, and 32 MB of shared L3 cache. This cache configuration helps feed the 8 cores with data, reducing latency and improving performance in cache-sensitive workloads. Memory support is LPDDR5X via a quad-channel interface, providing 256.0 GB/s of memory bandwidth. ECC memory is supported, which is a feature typically found in workstation-class processors. The integrated graphics is a Radeon 8050S, though the discrete RTX 4060 Mobile will handle graphics in this configuration.

The Cinebench scores reveal the CPU's performance profile. The R23 multicore score of 15674 is strong for a 55 W mobile part, indicating that the 8 cores can sustain high clocks under load. The R23 singlecore score of 2212 shows excellent per-core performance, which is critical for lightly threaded applications and games. The ratio between multicore and singlecore scores (roughly 7:1 for 8 cores) suggests good scaling across threads.

PassMark scores provide additional insight. The integer math score of 107046 and floating-point math score of 71105 indicate balanced compute capabilities. Data compression at 406505 is particularly strong, suggesting good performance in file archiving and compression tasks. Data encryption at 19926 is modest, which may reflect the absence of specialized encryption acceleration. The find prime numbers score of 165 is low relative to other tests, indicating that this workload may not benefit as much from the architecture.

For real workloads, the Ryzen AI Max 385 excels in multithreaded tasks such as video encoding, 3D rendering, and software compilation. The high single-core performance also ensures snappy responsiveness in everyday tasks and good performance in games that rely on a few fast cores. The 32 MB of L3 cache helps with gaming performance, as game engines frequently access shared data. The quad-channel LPDDR5X memory provides ample bandwidth for both CPU and iGPU operations, though the discrete GPU has its own dedicated memory.

Upgrade Path and Platform — socket, memory support, PCIe, PSU headroom from suggestedPsu/tdp, what a sensible next upgrade looks like

The platform is built around AMD Socket FP11, which is a mobile-specific socket. This limits upgradeability to replacing the entire laptop, as the CPU and GPU are typically soldered to the motherboard. The CPU supports LPDDR5X memory in a quad-channel configuration, which is integrated into the system rather than user-replaceable. This means memory capacity is fixed at the time of purchase.

PCIe connectivity is Gen 4 with 16 lanes from the CPU. The GPU uses a PCIe 4.0 x8 interface, which leaves bandwidth headroom for other devices such as NVMe SSDs. The discrete GPU has a TDP of 115 W, while the CPU has a TDP of 55 W, creating a combined thermal envelope of 170 W. The suggested PSU is not specified, so power supply requirements are based on these TDP figures. A laptop with this configuration will require a robust power adapter to handle peak loads.

The integrated Radeon 8050S GPU provides a fallback for video output when the discrete GPU is not in use, potentially saving power. The CPU supports ECC memory, which is a rare feature in mobile platforms and may be valuable for users who require data integrity in scientific computing or financial modeling.

Given the fixed nature of the platform, the sensible "upgrade path" is to maximize the configuration at purchase time. Users should prioritize memory capacity, as it cannot be expanded later. Storage is likely upgradeable via the PCIe Gen 4 lanes, so users can add or replace NVMe SSDs. The platform supports PCIe Gen 4, so users should select Gen 4 SSDs to achieve optimal transfer speeds.

Balance and Bottleneck — which component limits which workload, using percentiles and FPS scaling as evidence

The balance between the CPU and GPU is skewed towards the CPU. The CPU's 88th percentile ranking versus the GPU's 67th percentile indicates that the CPU is the stronger component relative to its peers. In CPU-bound workloads such as software compilation, data compression, and physics simulations, the Ryzen AI Max 385 will perform admirably, with the GPU playing a minimal role.

In GPU-bound workloads such as gaming and 3D rendering, the RTX 4060 Mobile will be the limiting factor. The GPU's 67th percentile means it is competitive with desktop cards from previous generations, but it will not match the performance of higher-end mobile GPUs. For example, the GPU's performance is within 1.3% of the Intel Arc B580 and RTX 5060 Mobile, suggesting that these GPUs will produce similar frame rates.

The FPS scaling evidence is indirect since no measured FPS data exists. However, the GPU's DirectX scores provide a hint. The DX11 score of 157 is significantly higher than the DX12 score of 73, which may indicate that the GPU performs relatively better in older APIs. This could translate to better performance in games that use DX11, while DX12 titles may not fully utilize the hardware.

The CPU's memory bandwidth of 256.0 GB/s matches the GPU's memory bandwidth of 256.0 GB/s, which is a rare coincidence. This means that both components have identical data transfer capabilities, reducing the likelihood of one component starving the other for data. In practice, the CPU will likely not bottleneck the GPU in gaming, as the CPU's single-core performance is strong enough to feed the GPU's frame rendering pipeline.

The platform's combined percentile of 78 suggests that the overall system is well-balanced for its class. The CPU provides headroom for future software that utilizes more threads, while the GPU is adequate for current games at 1080p and moderate settings. Users who prioritize gaming over productivity may find the GPU to be the limiting factor, while users who prioritize compute workloads will appreciate the CPU's strength.

Who Should Build It — target users and industries (gamers at specific resolutions, content creators, developers, students, small business workstations) tied strictly to the measured performance

This platform is well-suited for users who need strong CPU performance for productivity tasks and solid GPU performance for graphics acceleration. The CPU's 88th percentile ranking makes it ideal for content creators who work with video editing, 3D rendering, and software development. The R23 multicore score of 15674 and PassMark multithread score of 33705 indicate that the CPU can handle demanding multithreaded workloads with ease.

Gamers at 1080p resolution will find the RTX 4060 Mobile sufficient for most titles, as the GPU's 67th percentile places it in the mid-range segment. The 8 GB VRAM is adequate for current games at 1080p with high settings, though 1440p gaming may require reduced settings in VRAM-intensive titles. The GPU's performance relative to the RTX 2080 (within 0.7%) suggests that it can handle games from the previous generation at high settings.

Content creators who work with video editing will benefit from the CPU's high multithreaded performance and the GPU's hardware-encoded video capabilities. The CPU's data compression score of 406505 indicates strong performance in file archiving, while the GPU's tensor cores can accelerate AI-based effects in editing software.

Software developers will appreciate the CPU's 8 cores and 16 threads, which can compile code faster than lower-core-count processors. The CPU's single-thread score of 4060 ensures fast response times in IDEs and build tools. The ECC memory support adds reliability for long-running build processes.

Students and small business workstations will find this platform capable of handling everyday tasks, office applications, and light content creation. The CPU's strong single-core performance ensures a snappy user experience, while the GPU can accelerate tasks like video conferencing effects and photo editing. The 55 W CPU TDP and 115 W GPU TDP suggest that this configuration will require a substantial power adapter, making it less portable than lower-power alternatives.

Usage Scenarios — grounded in the scores: high-refresh gaming, streaming, video editing, 3D rendering, software development, student and office work. One short paragraph per scenario, citing the numbers that support the verdict

High-refresh gaming: The RTX 4060 Mobile's 17469 G3D score places it in the 67th percentile, which is adequate for 1080p gaming at high refresh rates. The CPU's single-core score of 4060 ensures that the processor will not bottleneck the GPU in most games. However, the GPU's DirectX 12 score of 73 is lower than its DirectX 11 score of 157, suggesting that some DX12 titles may not achieve peak frame rates.

Streaming: The CPU's 8 cores and 16 threads provide ample headroom for encoding while gaming. The PassMark multithread score of 33705 indicates that the CPU can handle simultaneous game and encoding workloads. The GPU's NVENC encoder, part of the Ada Lovelace architecture, can offload encoding to the GPU, freeing CPU resources for other tasks. The 256.0 GB/s memory bandwidth on both CPU and GPU ensures smooth data transfer during streaming.

Video editing: The CPU's R23 multicore score of 15674 is strong for video editing, which benefits from multithreaded performance. The GPU's 11.61 TFLOPS of FP32 compute can accelerate effects and transitions. The 8 GB VRAM is sufficient for 1080p and moderate 4K timelines, though longer 4K projects may require proxy workflows. The CPU's data compression score of 406505 indicates fast export and archival.

3D rendering: The CPU's 88th percentile ranking makes it a strong performer for CPU-based rendering. The R20 multicore score of 6583 and R23 multicore score of 15674 indicate that the CPU can handle complex scenes. The GPU's 24 RT cores and 96 tensor cores can accelerate ray-traced rendering in compatible software. The 8 GB VRAM may be a limitation for very large scenes, but it is adequate for most projects.

Software development: The CPU's 8 cores and 16 threads provide fast compilation times. The PassMark integer math score of 107046 and extended instructions score of 33873 indicate strong performance in compute-intensive tasks. The single-thread score of 4060 ensures fast response times in IDEs. The ECC memory support adds reliability for long build processes.

Student and office work: The CPU's single-thread score of 4060 ensures a responsive experience in office applications, web browsing, and productivity tools. The GPU's 730 G2D score indicates strong 2D performance for desktop rendering and video playback. The 55 W CPU TDP and 115 W GPU TDP suggest moderate power consumption, making this platform suitable for a desktop-replacement laptop.

FAQ — 5-7 Q&A pairs answerable from FACT PACK data

Q: How does the Ryzen AI Max 385 compare to the Intel Core i9-13950HX?

A: The Ryzen AI Max 385 has an average benchmark score of 44309, which is 0.1% lower than the Intel Core i9-13950HX's score of 44342. The two processors are effectively tied in performance.

Q: What is the GPU's memory configuration?

A: The NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Mobile has 8 GB of GDDR6 memory on a 128-bit bus, delivering 256.0 GB/s of memory bandwidth. The memory runs at 2000 MHz with 16 Gbps effective speed.

Q: Does the CPU support ECC memory?

A: Yes, the AMD Ryzen AI Max 385 supports ECC memory. It uses LPDDR5X memory in a quad-channel configuration, providing 256.0 GB/s of memory bandwidth.

Q: What is the CPU's process node and architecture?

A: The CPU is built on TSMC's 4 nm process and uses the Zen 5 architecture, codenamed Strix Halo. The die size is 2x 70.6 mm².

Q: How does the RTX 4060 Mobile compare to the RTX 2080?

A: The RTX 4060 Mobile has an average benchmark score of 22729, which is 0.7% lower than the RTX 2080's score of 22895. The two GPUs are very close in performance.

Q: What is the combined performance percentile of this platform?

A: The combined percentile for the AMD Ryzen AI Max 385 and NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Mobile is 78. The CPU ranks in the 88th percentile, while the GPU ranks in the 67th percentile.

Q: What is the CPU's clock speed range?

A: The CPU has a base clock of 3.60 GHz and a boost clock of 5.00 GHz. The thermal design power is 55 W.

Gaming Performance — measured FPS by game and resolution from measuredFpsUltraByGame (or, if dataIsMeasured is false, frame expectations qualitatively from the benchmark scores and say the figures are estimates)

No measured FPS data exists for this exact combination of AMD Ryzen AI Max 385 and NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Mobile. The FACT PACK contains no measured FPS rows for this pairing. Therefore, all gaming performance figures are estimates based on the benchmark scores of the individual components.

The GPU's PassMark G3D score of 17469 and its 67th percentile ranking provide a baseline for performance expectations. The GPU is within 1.3% of the Intel Arc B580 and RTX 5060 Mobile, suggesting that it will deliver frame rates similar to those GPUs. The GPU's performance relative to the RTX 2080 (within 0.7%) indicates that it can handle games from the previous generation at high settings.

The CPU's high single-thread score of 4060 and 88th percentile ranking ensure that it will not bottleneck the GPU in most gaming scenarios. The 32 MB of L3 cache and 256.0 GB/s of memory bandwidth provide ample data throughput for game engines.

For 1080p gaming, the RTX 4060 Mobile is expected to deliver high frame rates in most titles, potentially exceeding 60 FPS in demanding games and 100+ FPS in esports titles. At 1440p, frame rates will be lower, with the GPU likely delivering 40-60 FPS in demanding games and 60+ FPS in lighter titles. The 8 GB VRAM may require reduced texture settings in games that use more than 8 GB of VRAM at high resolutions.

The GPU's DirectX 11 score of 157 is significantly higher than its DirectX 12 score of 73, which may indicate that the GPU performs relatively better in DX11 titles. Games that use DX12 may not achieve the same frame rates as DX11 equivalents. Ray tracing performance will be supported via the 24 RT cores, but the GPU's mid-range positioning suggests that ray tracing at high settings will be challenging, and DLSS will be necessary to maintain playable frame rates.

These estimates are based on benchmark scores and should be treated as approximations. Actual gaming performance will vary depending on the game, driver version, and laptop cooling solution.

Rate My PC: AMD Ryzen AI Max 385 + NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Mobile

Apex Performer

System Balance Analysis

AMD Ryzen AI Max 385

NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Mobile

Market Position

Game Performance Benchmarks

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

Performance Insights

Optimal Performance

4K Gaming Ready

Performance Tiers Explained

Ultimate

High-End

Mid-Range

Entry Level

Legacy

GPU Analysis — VRAM, bandwidth, clocks, RT/tensor hardware, what the benchmark scores mean for rendering

Benchmark Performance — exact CPU and GPU scores, percentile positions, and what the combined picture is

CPU Analysis — cores, clocks, architecture, what the benchmark scores mean for real workloads

Upgrade Path and Platform — socket, memory support, PCIe, PSU headroom from suggestedPsu/tdp, what a sensible next upgrade looks like

Balance and Bottleneck — which component limits which workload, using percentiles and FPS scaling as evidence

Who Should Build It — target users and industries (gamers at specific resolutions, content creators, developers, students, small business workstations) tied strictly to the measured performance

Usage Scenarios — grounded in the scores: high-refresh gaming, streaming, video editing, 3D rendering, software development, student and office work. One short paragraph per scenario, citing the numbers that support the verdict

FAQ — 5-7 Q&A pairs answerable from FACT PACK data

Gaming Performance — measured FPS by game and resolution from measuredFpsUltraByGame (or, if dataIsMeasured is false, frame expectations qualitatively from the benchmark scores and say the figures are estimates)

4K Gaming Performance

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

1440p Gaming Performance

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

1080p Gaming Performance

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

Related Processors

Related Graphics Cards

Compare Your CPU

Compare Your GPU

Related PC Builds

Same CPU with Different GPUs

Same GPU with Different CPUs

Other Popular Builds