SYSTEM ANALYZER

Rate My PC: AMD Ryzen AI Max 385 + AMD Radeon 860M

Get a comprehensive performance analysis of your gaming rig with detailed benchmarks, bottleneck detection, and upgrade recommendations

93 / 100
ULTIMATE READY

Apex Performer

Top 7% of systems. Capable of 4K Ultra gaming and advanced rendering.

4K 60+ FPSVR ReadyRay Tracing

System Balance Analysis

CPU vs GPU performance ratio
Well Balanced
CPU
93%
VS
GPU
93%
PROCESSOR

AMD Ryzen AI Max 385

44,309 Benchmark Score
Top 7% Market Ranking
View Full Specs →
GRAPHICS CARD

AMD Radeon 860M

26,401 Benchmark Score
Top 7% Market Ranking
View Full Specs →

Market Position

How your build compares to others
Budget
0-30
Mid-Range
30-60
High-End
60-85
Enthusiast
85-100
Your Build

Game Performance Benchmarks

Real-world 4K FPS in popular titles
View All Games →

Performance Insights

Tips to maximize your system

Optimal Performance

Your system is in the top tier. You can run any modern game at maximum settings.

4K Gaming Ready

Consider a 4K 144Hz monitor to fully utilize your hardware capabilities.

Compatible Games See what you can play Compare CPUs Find upgrades Compare GPUs Find upgrades

Performance Tiers Explained

90-100

Ultimate

4K Ultra gaming, VR ready, ray tracing enabled, professional workloads

4K 60+ FPS VR Ready
70-89

High-End

1440p Ultra or 4K High settings, excellent for modern AAA titles

1440p Ultra 4K High
50-69

Mid-Range

1080p Ultra or 1440p Medium, great value for most gamers

1080p Ultra 1440p Med
30-49

Entry Level

1080p Medium settings, suitable for eSports and older titles

1080p Med eSports
0-29

Legacy

Basic gaming, older titles, consider upgrading for modern games

720p-1080p Low Older Games

The AMD Ryzen AI Max 385 and Radeon 860M combination represents a high-end mobile computing platform built on AMD’s latest architectures. The CPU is a Zen 5 part from the Strix Halo family, while the GPU is an RDNA 3.5 integrated graphics solution from the Krackan Point chip. This pairing is designed for laptops, targeting users who need strong multi-threaded processing power and capable integrated graphics without a discrete GPU. The benchmark data shows a system that sits in the upper tier of mobile performance, though its gaming capabilities are defined by its integrated nature rather than discrete-level performance.

CPU Analysis

The AMD Ryzen AI Max 385 is an 8-core, 16-thread processor based on the Zen 5 architecture, built on TSMC's 4 nm process node. It operates with a base clock of 3.60 GHz and a boost clock of 5.00 GHz, with a 55 W TDP. The chip uses the AMD Socket FP11 and is part of the Strix Halo codename family, indicating a focus on high-performance mobile computing. The cache hierarchy is substantial: 80 KB of L1 per core, 1 MB of L2 per core, and a shared 32 MB of L3 cache. Memory support includes LPDDR5X with a quad-channel interface, delivering a memory bandwidth of 256.0 GB/s, which is a critical advantage for both CPU and GPU performance in this unified memory architecture.

Benchmark data shows this CPU achieves a Cinebench R23 multi-core score of 15674 and a single-core score of 2212. In PassMark testing, it scores 107046 in integer math and 71105 in floating-point math, indicating strong general-purpose compute capabilities. The CPU's average benchmark score is 44309, placing it at the 88th percentile among all CPUs. This is a high-ranking position, meaning it outperforms the vast majority of processors on the market. Compared to its nearest rivals, the data reveals a tight competition: it is 0.1% behind the Intel Core i9-13950HX (score 44342), 0.2% ahead of the Intel Core i5-13600 (score 44240), 0.4% behind the Intel Core Ultra X9 388H (score 44466), and 0.6% behind the AMD Ryzen 5 7500X3D (score 44573). These deltas are minimal, indicating that the Ryzen AI Max 385 delivers performance statistically equivalent to these high-end desktop and mobile competitors.

For real workloads, the data suggests this CPU is a versatile performer. The Cinebench R23 multi-core score of 15674 indicates it can handle demanding multi-threaded tasks like video rendering and code compilation with ease. The single-core score of 2212 ensures responsive day-to-day operation and strong performance in lightly-threaded applications. The PassMark data encryption score of 19926 and data compression score of 406505 further highlight its capability in data-intensive tasks. With its quad-channel memory interface providing 256.0 GB/s of bandwidth, the CPU is well-suited for workloads that are memory-sensitive, such as large dataset manipulation and virtual machines. The 88th percentile ranking confirms this is a top-tier mobile processor, though the near-identical scores of its rivals mean that real-world differences in CPU-bound tasks will be negligible.

GPU Analysis

The AMD Radeon 860M is an integrated graphics processor based on the RDNA 3.5 architecture, built on the same 4 nm process node as the CPU. It features 512 shading units, 32 texture mapping units, and 16 raster output units. The GPU operates at a base clock of 600 MHz and a boost clock of 3000 MHz. It includes 8 ray tracing cores, and its compute capabilities are rated at 3.072 TFLOPS for both FP32 and FP16 operations. The pixel rate is 48.00 GPixel/s, and the texture rate is 96.00 GTexel/s. Memory is system shared, meaning it uses the same LPDDR5X memory as the CPU, and its bandwidth is system dependent, though the CPU's 256.0 GB/s quad-channel interface provides a strong foundation for integrated graphics.

Benchmark results show a Geekbench OpenCL score of 22759 and a Geekbench Vulkan score of 30043. The average benchmark score is 26401, placing the GPU at the 72nd percentile among all GPUs. This is a respectable position for an integrated solution, though it indicates that discrete GPUs generally offer more performance. The nearest rivals highlight its standing: it is 0.1% behind the NVIDIA GeForce MX550 (score 26421), 0.3% ahead of the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5060 (score 26331), 0.6% behind the AMD Radeon RX 5700 XT 50th Anniversary (score 26553), and 1.1% behind the NVIDIA RTX A4000 (score 26683). The proximity of these scores suggests the Radeon 860M performs at a level comparable to entry-level discrete mobile GPUs and older mid-range desktop cards, which is a significant achievement for integrated graphics.

For rendering and graphics workloads, the data shows the Radeon 860M is capable of handling modern tasks, though with limitations. The Vulkan score of 30043 indicates solid performance in modern graphics APIs, while the OpenCL score of 22759 suggests reasonable compute performance for tasks like video encoding acceleration or light GPU-accelerated rendering. The presence of 8 ray tracing cores means hardware-accelerated ray tracing is supported, but given the overall compute throughput of 3.072 TFLOPS, ray tracing performance will be modest. The 72nd percentile ranking confirms that this GPU outperforms most integrated solutions and some older discrete GPUs, but it is not a replacement for a high-end discrete graphics card. The system shared memory architecture means that allocating more system RAM to the GPU can improve performance, but the total bandwidth is shared with the CPU, which can create contention in memory-heavy workloads.

Benchmark Performance

The combined benchmark picture for this CPU+GPU pairing shows a system that is well-balanced for a laptop, with the CPU being the stronger component. The CPU's average benchmark score is 44309, placing it at the 88th percentile among all CPUs. The GPU's average benchmark score is 26401, placing it at the 72nd percentile among all GPUs. The combined percentile for this pairing is 80, indicating that the system as a whole outperforms 80% of all CPU+GPU combinations in the database.

In terms of CPU performance, the Cinebench R15 multi-core score is 1579, and the single-core score is 222. The Cinebench R20 multi-core score is 6583, and the single-core score is 929. The Cinebench R23 multi-core score is 15674, and the single-core score is 2212. These scores show a consistent scaling pattern across different rendering workloads, indicating that the CPU's 16 threads are effectively utilized. The PassMark multi-thread score is 33705, which is a strong result, while the single-thread score of 4060 confirms excellent per-core performance. The CPU also scores 1889 in PassMark physics, 43725 in random string sorting, and 33873 in extended instructions, showing broad capability across different task types.

For the GPU, the Geekbench OpenCL score of 22759 and Vulkan score of 30043 are the primary metrics. The Vulkan score is notably higher than the OpenCL score, which is typical for AMD GPUs and suggests that the hardware is well-optimized for modern gaming APIs. The GPU's percentile ranking of 72 means it is in the top third of all GPUs, which is impressive for an integrated solution. The overall picture is that this system is CPU-dominant, with the CPU sitting at the 88th percentile and the GPU at the 72nd percentile. This means that in CPU-bound workloads, the system will perform exceptionally well, while in GPU-bound workloads, it will be limited by the integrated graphics' compute capabilities. The combined percentile of 80 reflects a system that is well above average, though the gap between CPU and GPU performance is significant and will define the system's behavior in various tasks.

Gaming Performance

The FACT PACK contains no measured FPS data for this exact combination, so all gaming performance figures here are estimates based on the benchmark scores. The data indicates that the Radeon 860M is the limiting factor in gaming scenarios, as its performance is significantly lower than the CPU's. With a Geekbench Vulkan score of 30043 and an OpenCL score of 22759, the GPU is positioned to handle esports titles and older games at 1080p with medium to high settings, but it will struggle with modern AAA titles at high settings or high resolutions.

Given the CPU's high single-core performance (Cinebench R23 single-core score of 2212) and the GPU's 3.072 TFLOPS of compute power, frame rates in most games will be GPU-bound. The integrated nature of the GPU means it relies on system memory, and while the quad-channel LPDDR5X interface provides 256.0 GB/s of bandwidth, this is still shared with the CPU, which can cause frame pacing issues in memory-intense scenes. For competitive games like CS:GO or Valorant, the CPU and GPU combination could deliver playable frame rates at 1080p with competitive settings. For more demanding titles like Cyberpunk 2077 or Starfield, users should expect to lower settings to 720p or use upscaling technologies to achieve playable frame rates. The ray tracing cores are present, but the low compute throughput means that ray tracing is not a practical feature for gaming, as it would severely impact frame rates. Overall, this is a system for casual and esports gaming, not for high-refresh-rate triple-A gaming.

Balance and Bottleneck

The benchmark data clearly shows that the GPU is the primary bottleneck in this system. The CPU sits at the 88th percentile among all CPUs, while the GPU sits at the 72nd percentile among all GPUs. This 16-percentile point gap indicates that the CPU is significantly more powerful than the GPU. In CPU-bound workloads such as video encoding, software compilation, and multi-threaded productivity tasks, the system will perform exceptionally well, as the CPU's 15674 Cinebench R23 multi-core score demonstrates. However, in GPU-bound workloads like gaming, 3D rendering, and GPU-accelerated compute, the system will be limited by the Radeon 860M's performance.

The FPS scaling in gaming would be dictated by the GPU's capabilities. The GPU's near-identical score to the NVIDIA GeForce MX550 (deltaPct of -0.1%) suggests that gaming performance will be similar to that entry-level discrete GPU, meaning users should expect 1080p gaming at medium settings in most titles. The CPU will not be a limiting factor in these scenarios, as its single-core performance is strong enough to feed the GPU in most games. However, in CPU-heavy simulations or strategy games that rely on physics calculations, the CPU's PassMark physics score of 1889 will provide a smooth experience, but the GPU may still hold back overall frame rates. The balance is heavily skewed towards the CPU, which means users who prioritize gaming should be aware that the integrated GPU will not fully utilize the CPU's potential. Conversely, users who prioritize productivity and compute tasks will find this system to be excellently balanced, with the CPU providing top-tier performance.

Usage Scenarios

High-refresh gaming: This is not the ideal use case for this system. The Radeon 860M's performance, while respectable for integrated graphics at the 72nd percentile, is not sufficient for high-refresh-rate gaming at 1080p in modern titles. Users can expect playable frame rates in esports titles, but the GPU will limit the experience.

Streaming: The CPU's 16 threads and strong multi-core performance (Cinebench R23 multi-core score of 15674) make it well-suited for streaming. The x264 encoding workload can be handled by the CPU without significantly impacting game performance, though the integrated GPU's performance may limit the game's visual settings.

Video editing: This is a strong use case. The CPU's 88th percentile ranking and high PassMark integer math score of 107046 indicate excellent performance in video editing software that utilizes multi-threading. The GPU can assist with effects and rendering, but the CPU will do the heavy lifting.

3D rendering: The CPU will excel in CPU-based rendering workloads, with the Cinebench R23 multi-core score of 15674 demonstrating strong performance in applications like Blender's Cycles or V-Ray. GPU-accelerated rendering will be limited by the Radeon 860M's compute power and will not be competitive with discrete GPUs.

Software development: The CPU is ideal for this scenario. The high single-core score of 2212 in Cinebench R23 ensures fast compilation times for single-threaded tasks, while the multi-core score helps with parallel builds. The 32 MB of L3 cache and 256.0 GB/s memory bandwidth will also benefit large codebases.

Student and office work: This system is overkill for standard office tasks, but it provides a smooth experience. The CPU's single-thread performance ensures responsive application usage, and the integrated GPU can handle 4K video playback without issue. The 55 W TDP is efficient enough for a laptop, though battery life will depend on the specific implementation.

Who Should Build It

This pairing is targeted at users who need a high-performance laptop for productivity and content creation, with gaming as a secondary consideration. The CPU's 88th percentile ranking makes it an excellent choice for developers, video editors, and professionals who rely on multi-threaded performance. The integrated GPU's 72nd percentile ranking means it can handle light gaming and GPU-accelerated tasks, but it is not for gamers seeking high refresh rates or high-fidelity graphics. Students and office workers will find the system to be exceptionally fast for their needs, though they may be paying for performance they do not require. Small business workstations that run virtual machines, compile code, or process large datasets will benefit from the CPU's compute capabilities. The system is also suitable for content creators who work primarily in CPU-bound applications like Adobe Premiere Pro or DaVinci Resolve, where the CPU's multi-core performance is critical. This is not a system for gamers at 1440p or 4K resolutions, nor is it for 3D artists who rely on GPU rendering.

FAQ

Q: What is the CPU's performance relative to its nearest rivals?

A: The Ryzen AI Max 385 has an average benchmark score of 44309, which is 0.1% below the Intel Core i9-13950HX, 0.2% above the Intel Core i5-13600, 0.4% below the Intel Core Ultra X9 388H, and 0.6% below the AMD Ryzen 5 7500X3D. This indicates performance is statistically equivalent to these high-end CPUs.

Q: How does the Radeon 860M compare to discrete GPUs?

A: The Radeon 860M's average benchmark score of 26401 places it at the 72nd percentile. It is 0.1% behind the NVIDIA GeForce MX550 and 0.3% ahead of the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5060, indicating performance comparable to entry-level discrete mobile GPUs.

Q: What is the combined performance percentile of this CPU+GPU pairing?

A: The combined percentile for this pairing is 80, meaning it outperforms 80% of all CPU+GPU combinations in the database. The CPU is at the 88th percentile, and the GPU is at the 72nd percentile.

Q: Is this system good for gaming?

A: Gaming performance is limited by the integrated Radeon 860M. The GPU's Vulkan score of 30043 suggests it can handle esports titles at 1080p, but it is not suitable for high-refresh-rate or high-fidelity gaming. There is no measured FPS data for this combination, so these are estimates.

Q: What is the memory configuration and bandwidth?

A: The CPU supports LPDDR5X memory with a quad-channel interface, providing 256.0 GB/s of memory bandwidth. The GPU uses system shared memory, so its bandwidth is system dependent but benefits from this high-bandwidth interface.

Q: Does the CPU have ECC memory support?

A: Yes, the Ryzen AI Max 385 supports ECC memory, which is a feature that can be beneficial for workstation and server-like workloads where data integrity is critical.

Q: What is the GPU's ray tracing capability?

A: The Radeon 860M has 8 ray tracing cores, but its low compute throughput of 3.072 TFLOPS means that ray tracing performance will be modest and not suitable for demanding ray-traced gaming.

Build Overview

This build pairs the AMD Ryzen AI Max 385 CPU with the AMD Radeon 860M integrated GPU in a laptop form factor. The CPU is an 8-core, 16-thread Zen 5 processor with a 5.00 GHz boost clock and a 55 W TDP, featuring a 32 MB L3 cache and 256.0 GB/s of memory bandwidth. The GPU is an RDNA 3.5 integrated solution with 512 shading units and a 3000 MHz boost clock. The system's combined percentile is 80, placing it in the upper tier of all CPU+GPU combinations. The CPU is the dominant component at the 88th percentile, while the GPU sits at the 72nd percentile. This is a high-performance laptop platform designed for CPU-intensive workloads like content creation, software development, and productivity, with gaming as a secondary capability. The system represents a top-tier mobile processor paired with a competent integrated GPU, making it a strong choice for professionals who need portable computing power without a discrete GPU.