SYSTEM ANALYZER

Rate My PC: AMD Ryzen AI Max 385 + AMD Radeon 8050S

Get a comprehensive performance analysis of your gaming rig with detailed benchmarks, bottleneck detection, and upgrade recommendations

Build Configuration

Select your components

PROCESSOR (CPU)

▼

GRAPHICS CARD (GPU)

▼

95 Score

Top 5% Ranking

95 / 100

ULTIMATE READY

Apex Performer

Top 5% of systems. Capable of 4K Ultra gaming and advanced rendering.

4K 60+ FPSVR ReadyRay Tracing

System Balance Analysis

CPU vs GPU performance ratio

Well Balanced

CPU

93%

GPU

97%

PROCESSOR

AMD Ryzen AI Max 385

44,309 Benchmark Score

Top 7% Market Ranking

View Full Specs →

GRAPHICS CARD

AMD Radeon 8050S

62,108 Benchmark Score

Top 3% Market Ranking

View Full Specs →

Market Position

How your build compares to others

Budget

0-30

Mid-Range

30-60

High-End

60-85

Enthusiast

85-100

Your Build

Game Performance Benchmarks

Real-world 4K FPS in popular titles

View All Games →

Performance Insights

Tips to maximize your system

Optimal Performance

Your system is in the top tier. You can run any modern game at maximum settings.

4K Gaming Ready

Consider a 4K 144Hz monitor to fully utilize your hardware capabilities.

Compatible Games See what you can play Compare CPUs Find upgrades Compare GPUs Find upgrades

Performance Tiers Explained

90-100

Ultimate

4K Ultra gaming, VR ready, ray tracing enabled, professional workloads

4K 60+ FPS VR Ready

70-89

High-End

1440p Ultra or 4K High settings, excellent for modern AAA titles

1440p Ultra 4K High

50-69

Mid-Range

1080p Ultra or 1440p Medium, great value for most gamers

1080p Ultra 1440p Med

30-49

Entry Level

1080p Medium settings, suitable for eSports and older titles

1080p Med eSports

0-29

Legacy

Basic gaming, older titles, consider upgrading for modern games

720p-1080p Low Older Games

The AMD Ryzen AI Max 385 and AMD Radeon 8050S form a laptop-class platform that pairs an 8-core, 16-thread Zen 5 CPU with an integrated RDNA 3.5 GPU inside a single Strix Halo package. The CPU is rated at an 88th-percentile rank, the GPU at an 89th-percentile rank, and the combined platform at an 89th-percentile position. Both components carry a 55 W TDP, and the GPU is an IGP with no separate power connectors.

CPU Analysis

The AMD Ryzen AI Max 385 is a Zen 5 part from the Strix Halo family, built on TSMC's 4 nm process with a die size of 2x 70.6 mm². It has 8 cores and 16 threads, a base clock of 3.60 GHz, and a boost clock of 5.00 GHz. The multiplier is locked, and the package uses AMD Socket FP11, which is a mobile market segment socket. The cache layout is 80 KB of L1 per core, 1 MB of L2 per core, and 32 MB of shared L3. Memory support consists of quad-channel LPDDR5X with 256.0 GB/s of bandwidth and ECC support enabled. That memory configuration is especially relevant for an integrated-GPU platform because the GPU uses shared system memory.

The CPU's aggregate average benchmark score is 44309, placing it in the 88th percentile of all CPUs. Its nearest rivals in that aggregate ranking are Intel Core i9-13950HX at 44342 with a delta of -0.1%, Intel Core i5-13600 at 44240 with a delta of 0.2%, Intel Core Ultra X9 388H at 44466 with a delta of -0.4%, and AMD Ryzen 5 7500X3D at 44573 with a delta of -0.6%. This means the Ryzen AI Max 385 sits in a very tight cluster around these parts, within less than a point of each rival in percentage terms. No single rival is more than 0.6% away in either direction.

Cinebench results reinforce the picture. The CPU scores 1579 in Cinebench R15 multicore, 222 in R15 single-core, 6583 in R20 multicore, 929 in R20 single-core, 15674 in R23 multicore, and 2212 in R23 single-core. The single-thread R23 score of 2212 points to strong per-core Zen 5 performance, while the multicore score of 15674 shows that the 8-core/16-thread design scales well under threaded rendering workloads. PassMark data follows the same trend: a single-thread score of 4060, a multithread score of 33705, integer math of 107046, floating-point math of 71105, extended instructions of 33873, data compression of 406505, data encryption of 19926, random string sorting of 43725, physics of 1889, and find prime numbers of 165.

For real workloads, these numbers mean a CPU that is responsive in lightly threaded tasks and capable in multithreaded tasks. The data compression result of 406505 and encryption result of 19926 are particularly useful for archive, database, and secure-transfer workloads. The 256.0 GB/s memory bandwidth further supports data-heavy applications by giving both the CPU and the integrated GPU access to a wide memory pipeline.

Upgrade Path and Platform

The platform uses AMD Socket FP11, and the CPU market segment is Mobile. The Radeon 8050S is attached as an IGP, with a slot width listed as IGP, no power connectors, and display outputs described as portable-device dependent. No suggested PSU is provided in the data. The CPU and GPU each carry a 55 W TDP, which defines the platform's power class, but the data does not specify dynamic power-sharing limits between the two.

Memory support is quad-channel LPDDR5X with 256.0 GB/s of bandwidth and ECC support. PCIe support is split in an interesting way: the CPU provides PCIe Gen 4 with 16 lanes, and CPU-only lanes are specified, while the GPU's bus interface is listed as PCIe 5.0 x16. This is not a modular desktop platform. No discrete GPU upgrade path is documented in the data, and the integrated GPU has no external power connectors or board slot. The sensible next upgrade for a user of this kind of laptop-class system is therefore a different platform rather than a component-level swap; the available data describes a sealed, integrated mobile design.

Balance and Bottleneck

The CPU is at the 88th percentile, the GPU is at the 89th percentile, and the combined platform is at the 89th percentile. That one-point difference indicates a balanced pairing. In aggregate, the CPU averages 44309 and the GPU averages 62108, though these numbers come from different benchmark families and should not be compared directly. The percentile parity is the more meaningful comparison.

Which component limits which workload depends on the task. CPU-bound work is the domain of the 8-core/16-thread Zen 5 design; PassMark integer math of 107046, encryption of 19926, and extended instructions of 33873 are the relevant figures. GPU-bound work is the domain of the Radeon 8050S, with an OpenCL score of 65818, a Vulkan score of 58398, and 11.47 TFLOPS of FP32 throughput. Memory-bound work sits between them because the CPU memory controller supplies 256.0 GB/s to the platform and the GPU memory bandwidth is system dependent. Without measured FPS rows, frame-level bottleneck scaling cannot be quantified from this data. The aggregate percentiles, however, suggest neither the CPU nor the GPU is the dominant limiting factor at the platform level.

Usage Scenarios

High-refresh gaming: The Radeon 8050S has 2048 shading units, 32 RT cores, and 11.47 TFLOPS of FP32 throughput, placing it at the 89th GPU percentile. The CPU's 5.00 GHz boost clock and PassMark single-thread score of 4060 should keep game logic and draw-call processing from becoming a bottleneck. Exact FPS is not measured for this combination, but the component scores indicate a platform aimed at high frame rates on a laptop display.

Streaming: The 8-core/16-thread CPU provides parallel headroom for concurrent encoding and gameplay. PassMark multithread performance is 33705, data compression is 406505, and data encryption is 19926. These scores suggest the CPU can handle compute-heavy side tasks while maintaining game performance, though the available data does not specify encoder hardware or encoding-specific results.

Video editing: Cinebench R23 multicore of 15674 and PassMark floating-point math of 71105 support CPU-side timeline operations. The quad-channel LPDDR5X memory with 256.0 GB/s of bandwidth is a strong asset for scrubbing and previewing large media files. On the GPU side, the Geekbench OpenCL score of 65818 indicates useful compute acceleration for effects and transcoding.

3D rendering: The CPU delivers Cinebench R23 multicore of 15674, while the GPU delivers 11.47 TFLOPS of FP32 and 11.47 TFLOPS of FP16 with a 1:1 ratio. Geekbench OpenCL of 65818 and Vulkan of 58398 give two views of compute and graphics throughput. The GPU's nearest rival in average score is AMD Radeon Pro W6600M at 61896 with a delta of 0.3%, which is a workstation-oriented point of comparison.

Software development: PassMark integer math of 107046, extended instructions of 33873, and multithread of 33705 are all relevant to compilation, testing, and parallel tooling. A single-thread score of 4060 keeps interactive editor and terminal responses quick. The 16 threads of the CPU give build systems room to operate.

Student and office work: The 4 nm process and 55 W TDP fit a portable laptop-class device. The integrated Radeon 8050S handles display output, and the CPU's R23 single-core score of 2212 ensures responsive desktop and productivity applications. ECC memory support is an unusual and useful feature for users who want data integrity in a small workstation-class laptop.

Who Should Build It

This platform is for laptop buyers, not desktop builders. Its target user is someone who wants a high-tier integrated-GPU laptop without a discrete GPU. The GPU's 89th percentile position and the CPU's 88th percentile position make the pairing suitable for users who need both strong multithreaded processing and strong integrated graphics.

Gamers who want a laptop-class system with high GPU percentile performance fit the profile. The 32 RT cores and DirectX 12 Ultimate support indicate a willingness to handle modern rendering features, although no measured FPS data exists for validation. Content creators fit as well: the CPU's R23 multicore score of 15674, GPU OpenCL score of 65818, and 256.0 GB/s memory bandwidth cover video editing and 3D rendering workflows. Software developers will benefit from the integer math score of 107046, extended instructions of 33873, and 16 threads. Students who need a portable machine with active production status and a 55 W TDP are also a natural audience. Small business workstations can use the ECC memory support, 8-core/16-thread CPU, and integrated GPU in a sealed laptop chassis.

GPU Analysis

The AMD Radeon 8050S is built on RDNA 3.5, uses TSMC's 4 nm process, and belongs to the Navi Mobile (RX 8000M) generation. The die size is 308 mm². The GPU has a base clock of 1295 MHz and a boost clock of 2800 MHz. It contains 2048 shading units, 128 texture mapping units, 64 ROPs, and 32 RT cores. A tensor core count is not listed in the data. Pixel rate is 179.2 GPixel/s, texture rate is 358.4 GTexel/s, FP32 throughput is 11.47 TFLOPS, and FP16 throughput is also 11.47 TFLOPS with a 1:1 ratio.

Memory is entirely system shared. The size, type, and bus width are all listed as System Shared, and memory bandwidth is listed as System Dependent. This means the GPU draws on the same memory subsystem as the CPU, which in this platform consists of quad-channel LPDDR5X at 256.0 GB/s with ECC support. Because there is no dedicated VRAM, the GPU's effective memory performance will vary with the system memory implementation.

The GPU's Geekbench OpenCL score is 65818, and its Vulkan score is 58398. The average benchmark score is 62108, placing it at the 89th percentile of all GPUs. Its nearest rivals are AMD Radeon Pro W6600M at 61896 with a delta of 0.3%, AMD Radeon Pro Vega 56 at 63693 with a delta of -2.5%, AMD Radeon RX 7600M at 63775 with a delta of -2.6%, and AMD Radeon RX 9060 XT LP at 63830 with a delta of -2.7%. In other words, the 8050S sits slightly above the Pro W6600M and slightly below the other three rivals, all within a very small average-score window.

API support includes DirectX 12 Ultimate with feature level 12_2, OpenGL 4.6, and Vulkan 1.4. The Vulkan score of 58398 is a strong indicator for modern graphics workloads. For rendering, the OpenCL score of 65818 and the 11.47 TFLOPS FP32 figure are the key raw resources.

FAQ

Q: Which socket does the AMD Ryzen AI Max 385 use?

A: The CPU uses AMD Socket FP11, and its market segment is Mobile.

Q: How much cache does the CPU have?

A: The cache configuration is 80 KB of L1 per core, 1 MB of L2 per core, and 32 MB of shared L3.

Q: Does the Radeon 8050S have dedicated VRAM?

A: No. Its memory size, type, and bus width are all listed as System Shared, and memory bandwidth is System Dependent.

Q: How does the CPU compare to the Intel Core i9-13950HX in aggregate benchmark score?

A: The Ryzen AI Max 385 has an average score of 44309, while the Intel Core i9-13950HX averages 44342, giving a delta of -0.1%.

Q: What is the GPU's average benchmark score and percentile?

A: The Radeon 8050S averages 62108 and sits at the 89th percentile of all GPUs.

Q: Does the GPU support hardware ray tracing?

A: The data lists 32 RT cores and DirectX 12 Ultimate with feature level 12_2, which indicates ray-tracing-capable hardware.

Q: What memory support does the CPU provide?

A: The CPU supports quad-channel LPDDR5X with 256.0 GB/s of bandwidth and ECC memory support.

Build Overview

This is a laptop-class build: the AMD Ryzen AI Max 385 CPU is paired with the integrated AMD Radeon 8050S GPU in the same Strix Halo package. Both parts are listed as Active production, and both carry a 55 W TDP. The GPU is an IGP with no power connectors and portable-device-dependent display outputs. The platform's combined percentile is 89. In terms of tier, this is a high-end integrated mobile platform rather than a discrete-GPU laptop, with the CPU at the 88th percentile and the GPU at the 89th percentile.

Benchmark Performance

The CPU's exact scores include Cinebench R15 multicore of 1579, Cinebench R15 single-core of 222, Cinebench R20 multicore of 6583, Cinebench R20 single-core of 929, Cinebench R23 multicore of 15674, and Cinebench R23 single-core of 2212. PassMark results include multithread 33705, single-thread 4060, integer math 107046, floating-point math 71105, extended instructions 33873, data compression 406505, data encryption 19926, random string sorting 43725, physics 1889, and find prime numbers 165. Its average benchmark score is 44309, ranking it in the 88th percentile.

The GPU's exact scores are Geekbench OpenCL 65818 and Geekbench Vulkan 58398. Its average benchmark score is 62108, ranking it in the 89th percentile. The combined platform percentile is 89. The CPU sits within -0.1% of the Core i9-13950HX and within 0.2% of the Core i5-13600. The GPU sits within 0.3% of the Radeon Pro W6600M and within -2.7% of the Radeon RX 9060 XT LP. Taken together, the benchmark data describes a balanced platform where the CPU and GPU occupy nearly the same percentile tier.

Gaming Performance

No measured FPS rows are available for this exact CPU and GPU combination, and the measured-FPS flag is false. All FPS discussion here is therefore estimated qualitatively from benchmark scores rather than reported as measured results.

On the CPU side, the 5.00 GHz boost clock, PassMark single-thread score of 4060, and Cinebench R23 single-core score of 2212 all point to strong per-thread performance. On the GPU side, the 2048 shading units, 32 RT cores, 11.47 TFLOPS of FP32 throughput, and Vulkan score of 58398 indicate integrated-graphics performance at the 89th percentile. The nearest rival comparison reinforces this: the Radeon 8050S is 0.3% above the Radeon Pro W6600M in average score and only -2.6% below the Radeon RX 7600M.

The absence of dedicated VRAM and the system-dependent memory bandwidth mean that frame delivery will depend on the platform's memory implementation. The CPU memory controller provides 256.0 GB/s of LPDDR5X bandwidth in this design, which is the resource available to the shared GPU. High-refresh gaming is a plausible use case based on the component scores, but exact frame rates cannot be asserted from the available data. Heavier ray-traced workloads will exercise the 32 RT cores, while non-RT rendering workloads can use the full 11.47 TFLOPS of FP32 throughput. Overall, the available benchmarks suggest a laptop platform capable of strong gaming for an integrated GPU, with the caveat that no measured game FPS data exists to confirm specific performance levels.

Rate My PC: AMD Ryzen AI Max 385 + AMD Radeon 8050S

Apex Performer

System Balance Analysis

AMD Ryzen AI Max 385

AMD Radeon 8050S

Market Position

Game Performance Benchmarks

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

Performance Insights

Optimal Performance

4K Gaming Ready

Performance Tiers Explained

Ultimate

High-End

Mid-Range

Entry Level

Legacy

CPU Analysis

Upgrade Path and Platform

Balance and Bottleneck

Usage Scenarios

Who Should Build It

GPU Analysis

FAQ

Build Overview

Benchmark Performance

Gaming Performance

4K Gaming Performance

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

1440p Gaming Performance

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

1080p Gaming Performance

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

Related Processors

Related Graphics Cards

Compare Your CPU

Compare Your GPU

Related PC Builds

Same CPU with Different GPUs

Same GPU with Different CPUs

Other Popular Builds