SYSTEM ANALYZER

Rate My PC: AMD Ryzen AI Max 385 + AMD Radeon 740M

Get a comprehensive performance analysis of your gaming rig with detailed benchmarks, bottleneck detection, and upgrade recommendations

Build Configuration

Select your components

PROCESSOR (CPU)

▼

GRAPHICS CARD (GPU)

▼

90 Score

Top 10% Ranking

90 / 100

ULTIMATE READY

Apex Performer

Top 10% of systems. Capable of 4K Ultra gaming and advanced rendering.

4K 60+ FPSVR ReadyRay Tracing

System Balance Analysis

CPU vs GPU performance ratio

Well Balanced

CPU

93%

GPU

88%

PROCESSOR

AMD Ryzen AI Max 385

44,309 Benchmark Score

Top 7% Market Ranking

View Full Specs →

GRAPHICS CARD

AMD Radeon 740M

12,870 Benchmark Score

Top 12% Market Ranking

View Full Specs →

Market Position

How your build compares to others

Budget

0-30

Mid-Range

30-60

High-End

60-85

Enthusiast

85-100

Your Build

Game Performance Benchmarks

Real-world 4K FPS in popular titles

View All Games →

Performance Insights

Tips to maximize your system

Optimal Performance

Your system is in the top tier. You can run any modern game at maximum settings.

4K Gaming Ready

Consider a 4K 144Hz monitor to fully utilize your hardware capabilities.

Compatible Games See what you can play Compare CPUs Find upgrades Compare GPUs Find upgrades

Performance Tiers Explained

90-100

Ultimate

4K Ultra gaming, VR ready, ray tracing enabled, professional workloads

4K 60+ FPS VR Ready

70-89

High-End

1440p Ultra or 4K High settings, excellent for modern AAA titles

1440p Ultra 4K High

50-69

Mid-Range

1080p Ultra or 1440p Medium, great value for most gamers

1080p Ultra 1440p Med

30-49

Entry Level

1080p Medium settings, suitable for eSports and older titles

1080p Med eSports

0-29

Legacy

Basic gaming, older titles, consider upgrading for modern games

720p-1080p Low Older Games

The AMD Ryzen AI Max 385 is an 8-core, 16-thread mobile processor built on the Zen 5 architecture, specifically the Strix Halo codename, manufactured on TSMC's 4 nm process. It operates with a base clock of 3.60 GHz and a boost clock of 5.00 GHz, within a 55 W TDP envelope. The CPU features a two-chiplet design with a combined die size of 2x 70.6 mm². Its cache hierarchy includes 80 KB of L1 per core, 1 MB of L2 per core, and a shared 32 MB L3 cache. Memory support is limited to LPDDR5X, utilizing a quad-channel bus that provides a substantial 256.0 GB/s of bandwidth, and ECC memory is supported. This configuration is designed for the AMD Socket FP11 platform and integrates a Radeon 8050S GPU on the package, though the primary focus here is the CPU paired with the discrete Radeon 740M.

CPU Analysis

The Ryzen AI Max 385 delivers multi-threaded performance that places it in the upper echelon of mobile processors. In Cinebench R23, it scores 15,674 points in the multi-core test and 2,212 points in the single-core test. The multi-core result is particularly telling; it suggests the 8-core/16-thread design can sustain heavy all-core workloads, making it suitable for demanding productivity tasks. The single-core score of 2,212 indicates strong per-thread performance, which is critical for responsiveness in everyday applications and lightly-threaded games. In Cinebench R20, the scores are 6,583 multi-core and 929 single-core, while in the older Cinebench R15, it achieves 1,579 multi-core and 222 single-core. These results show a consistent scaling pattern across different rendering workloads, confirming the CPU's ability to leverage its thread count efficiently.

Looking at the PassMark suite, the CPU shows a well-rounded profile. The multithread score is 33,705, while the single-thread score is 4,060. Data compression performance is strong at 406,505, and integer math reaches 107,046. Floating-point math scores 71,105, and extended instructions (SIMD) hit 33,873. The data encryption score is 19,926, and random string sorting is 43,725. Physics simulation scores 1,889, and finding prime numbers scores 165. These numbers indicate that the CPU excels in tasks that involve complex calculations and data manipulation, such as encryption, sorting, and scientific computing. The average benchmark score for this CPU is 44,309, which places it in the 88th percentile of all CPUs. This is a high ranking, suggesting it outperforms the vast majority of processors currently available.

Compared to its nearest rivals, the Ryzen AI Max 385 is essentially neck-and-neck with several high-end desktop and mobile parts. It is 0.1% behind the Intel Core i9-13950HX, 0.2% ahead of the Intel Core i5-13600, 0.4% behind the Intel Core Ultra X9 388H, and 0.6% behind the AMD Ryzen 5 7500X3D. These deltas are minuscule, indicating that the AI Max 385 offers performance parity with these established competitors. The fact that it matches a desktop Core i5-13600 and a high-end mobile i9 part reflects its efficiency and architectural maturity. The 4 nm process and Zen 5 core design likely contribute to its ability to maintain high clocks (5.00 GHz boost) within a 55 W TDP, although the data does not specify efficiency margins directly.

Balance and Bottleneck

The pairing of the Ryzen AI Max 385 with the Radeon 740M creates a system where the CPU is significantly more powerful than the GPU. The CPU's 88th percentile ranking among all CPUs starkly contrasts with the GPU's 53rd percentile ranking among all GPUs. This disparity suggests that in graphics-intensive workloads, the Radeon 740M will be the primary bottleneck. The CPU is capable of feeding frames at a much higher rate than the GPU can render them, meaning that gaming performance will be limited by the GPU's capabilities. This is not necessarily a negative; for non-gaming tasks, the CPU's power is fully utilized without GPU interference.

The CPU's memory bandwidth of 256.0 GB/s is a critical asset for an integrated GPU, but in this case, the Radeon 740M is a separate component. The GPU's memory bandwidth is listed as "System Dependent," which means it relies on the system's RAM. With this CPU's quad-channel LPDDR5X support, the memory subsystem is robust. However, the GPU's performance is still capped by its own architecture—256 shading units, 16 TMUs, and 8 ROPs. The CPU can handle complex physics, AI calculations, and game logic without breaking a sweat, as evidenced by its PassMark scores. For example, the integer math score of 107,046 suggests it can process game logic and pathfinding efficiently. The bottleneck will manifest in frame rates: the GPU will be at 100% utilization while the CPU idles, waiting for the next frame to be rendered.

The combined percentile for this CPU+GPU pairing is 71, which is lower than the CPU's individual percentile but higher than the GPU's. This indicates that the overall system performance is dragged down by the GPU, but the CPU's strength boosts it above what the GPU alone would suggest. In productivity tasks that are CPU-bound—such as compiling code, running virtual machines, or batch processing—the system will perform admirably. In gaming, the bottleneck will be the GPU, and the CPU's potential will be largely untapped.

Usage Scenarios

For high-refresh gaming, this setup is limited by the GPU. The Radeon 740M is not designed for high-end gaming, and while the CPU can handle any game logic, the GPU will struggle to maintain high frame rates at high resolutions. The CPU's strong single-thread score of 4,060 in PassMark ensures that frame pacing will be stable, but the overall FPS will be constrained by the GPU's 2.867 TFLOPS of FP32 performance.

Streaming is a mixed bag. The CPU is more than capable of handling the encoding workload, with a data compression score of 406,505 and multithread score of 33,705. This means you can stream and play a game simultaneously without experiencing CPU-related stuttering. However, the game's frame rate will still be limited by the GPU, so streaming at high quality while gaming will likely result in lower FPS in-game.

Video editing in applications like Premiere Pro or DaVinci Resolve will benefit from the CPU's multi-core might. The Cinebench R23 multi-core score of 15,674 is strong, allowing for fast rendering and export times. The GPU can assist with effects and transitions, but its low ROP count (8) and limited shading units (256) mean that GPU-accelerated effects will be slower than on a dedicated graphics card. Still, for 1080p editing, this is a capable machine.

3D rendering in Blender or Maya will be CPU-bound, and the Ryzen AI Max 385 excels here. The Cinebench scores are a direct indicator of rendering performance, and the 15,674 multi-core score in R23 suggests it can handle complex scenes. The GPU's contribution to rendering will be minimal, so expect longer render times for GPU-accelerated features like OptiX or Cycles.

Software development is a strong suit. The high integer math score (107,046) and data encryption score (19,926) are relevant for compiling code and handling secure connections. The 16 threads allow for parallel builds, reducing compilation times. The fast memory bandwidth (256.0 GB/s) also helps with large codebases and virtual machine performance.

Student and office work will be exceptionally smooth. The single-thread performance (4,060 in PassMark) ensures that applications like Word, Excel, and web browsers feel snappy. The CPU's high percentile (88th) means it will handle multitasking with ease, such as running a spreadsheet, a video call, and a web browser simultaneously without noticeable slowdown.

Gaming Performance

The FACT PACK contains no measured FPS rows for this exact combination, and there is no measured FPS data for the Radeon 740M in this pairing. Therefore, all FPS figures discussed here are estimates based on the benchmark scores of the CPU and GPU. The GPU's average benchmark score is 12,870, which places it in the 53rd percentile of all GPUs. This is a mid-range ranking, suggesting it is capable of 1080p gaming at medium to low settings in most titles, but it will struggle with high or ultra settings.

The GPU's Geekbench scores provide some insight: it scores 10,172 in OpenCL and 15,568 in Vulkan. The Vulkan score is higher, indicating that games using Vulkan will perform better than those using OpenCL. The GPU has 256 shading units, 16 TMUs, and 8 ROPs, with a pixel rate of 22.40 GPixel/s and a texture rate of 44.80 GTexel/s. These specifications suggest that texture-heavy games will be a challenge, but simple geometric scenes will be fine. The FP32 performance is 2.867 TFLOPS, which is modest for modern titles.

Given the CPU's strength, esports titles like CS:GO, League of Legends, or Valorant should see playable frame rates at 1080p, likely above 60 FPS on medium settings, thanks to the CPU's high single-thread score. However, AAA titles like Cyberpunk 2077 or Assassin's Creed Mirage will likely run below 30 FPS at 1080p on low settings. The GPU is not designed for high-refresh gaming, so expect frame rates to be the limiting factor. The CPU's 256.0 GB/s memory bandwidth is available to the GPU, which helps, but the GPU's architecture is the bottleneck.

FAQ

Q: What is the CPU's multi-core performance compared to its nearest rival?

A: The Ryzen AI Max 385 scores 15,674 in Cinebench R23 multi-core. It is 0.1% behind the Intel Core i9-13950HX and 0.2% ahead of the Intel Core i5-13600, indicating near-identical performance.

Q: Does the Radeon 740M support ray tracing?

A: Yes, the Radeon 740M has 4 RT cores, and it supports DirectX 12 Ultimate (12_2), which includes ray tracing features. However, its low shading unit count (256) limits practical ray tracing performance.

Q: What is the GPU's percentile ranking?

A: The Radeon 740M is in the 53rd percentile of all GPUs, with an average benchmark score of 12,870. It is 0.2% ahead of the AMD FirePro W5100 and 0.3% ahead of the NVIDIA GeForce GTX 590.

Q: Can this system handle 4K video editing?

A: The CPU is capable of handling 4K video editing, with a Cinebench R23 multi-core score of 15,674 and a multithread PassMark score of 33,705. The GPU's 8 ROPs and 256 shading units may slow down effects, but the CPU will manage the heavy lifting.

Q: What is the memory bandwidth of the CPU's memory controller?

A: The CPU supports LPDDR5X memory on a quad-channel bus, providing 256.0 GB/s of bandwidth. This is a high figure for a mobile CPU, aiding in memory-intensive tasks.

Q: Is the CPU faster than the AMD Ryzen 5 7500X3D?

A: No, the Ryzen AI Max 385 is 0.6% behind the AMD Ryzen 5 7500X3D in average benchmark score. The difference is negligible, with scores of 44,309 and 44,573, respectively.

Q: What is the GPU's FP32 performance?

A: The Radeon 740M has an FP32 performance of 2.867 TFLOPS. This is a mid-range figure, suitable for light gaming and general graphics tasks.

GPU Analysis

The AMD Radeon 740M is an integrated graphics processor based on the RDNA 3.0 architecture, built on the Phoenix2 chip at a 4 nm process. It is manufactured by TSMC and contains 20,900 million transistors on a 137 mm² die, giving a transistor density of 152.6M per mm². The GPU operates at a base clock of 800 MHz and a boost clock of 2800 MHz. Its memory configuration is entirely system-shared, meaning it uses the system's RAM and does not have dedicated VRAM. The memory type, bus width, and bandwidth are all listed as "System Dependent," which means they vary based on the system's memory configuration. In this pairing, the CPU's 256.0 GB/s memory bandwidth is available to the GPU, which is an advantage over systems with slower memory.

The GPU has 256 shading units, 16 texture mapping units (TMUs), and 8 raster output units (ROPs). It also includes 4 ray tracing cores, but no tensor cores. The pixel rate is 22.40 GPixel/s, and the texture rate is 44.80 GTexel/s. The FP32 performance is 2.867 TFLOPS, and FP16 performance is the same at 2.867 TFLOPS (1:1). This indicates it does not have dedicated tensor or AI acceleration hardware. The GPU supports DirectX 12 Ultimate (12_2), OpenGL 4.6, and Vulkan 1.4, making it compatible with modern APIs. Its TDP is listed as 45 W, and it has no power connectors since it is an IGP. The bus interface is PCIe 4.0 x8, and display outputs are motherboard dependent.

In benchmark tests, the Radeon 740M scores 10,172 in Geekbench OpenCL and 15,568 in Geekbench Vulkan. The Vulkan score is significantly higher, suggesting better performance in Vulkan-based games and applications. The average benchmark score is 12,870, placing it in the 53rd percentile of all GPUs. This is a mid-tier position, indicating it is more capable than half of the GPUs in the database, but it is not a high-performance part. Its nearest rivals include the AMD FirePro W5100 (0.2% ahead), the AMD Radeon Pro 455 (0.3% ahead), and the NVIDIA GeForce GTX 590 (0.3% ahead). It is 0.4% ahead of the AMD Radeon RX 580. These rivals are all older or lower-end parts, confirming that the 740M is an entry-level GPU.

For rendering, the GPU's 8 ROPs are a significant limitation. ROPs handle pixel output, and a low count means lower resolution and fill-rate performance. The texture rate of 44.80 GTexel/s is also modest, so texture-heavy scenes will be slow. The 4 RT cores provide ray tracing functionality, but with only 256 shading units, the ray tracing performance will be poor in practice. The GPU is not designed for high-end 3D rendering; it is more suited for light graphical tasks, video playback, and casual gaming.

Benchmark Performance

The CPU's average benchmark score is 44,309, which places it in the 88th percentile of all CPUs. This is a strong result, indicating that it outperforms 88% of CPUs in the database. Its multi-core Cinebench R23 score of 15,674 is substantial, and its single-core score of 2,212 is also competitive. The PassMark multithread score of 33,705 and single-thread score of 4,060 corroborate the Cinebench results. The CPU's nearest rival, the Intel Core i9-13950HX, has an average score of 44,342, which is only 0.1% higher. This shows that the Ryzen AI Max 385 is essentially on par with a top-tier mobile Intel processor.

The GPU's average benchmark score is 12,870, placing it in the 53rd percentile of all GPUs. This is a median performance level. Its Geekbench Vulkan score of 15,568 is higher than its OpenCL score of 10,172, indicating better performance in Vulkan workloads. The GPU's nearest rival, the AMD FirePro W5100, has an average score of 12,847, which is 0.2% lower. This means the 740M is slightly ahead of the FirePro W5100 but behind the AMD Radeon RX 580 by 0.4%.

The combined picture is a system with a top-tier CPU and a mid-tier GPU. The combined percentile for the pair is 71, which is higher than the GPU's individual percentile but lower than the CPU's. This suggests that the CPU is the dominant component, and the system's overall performance is held back by the GPU. In CPU-intensive tasks, the system will perform at the 88th percentile level. In GPU-intensive tasks, it will perform at the 53rd percentile level. The average of these is reflected in the 71st combined percentile.

Build Overview

This build is a laptop-class system, as indicated by the buildClass field. It pairs the AMD Ryzen AI Max 385, a high-end mobile CPU, with the AMD Radeon 740M, an entry-level integrated GPU. The CPU's 88th percentile ranking makes it one of the more powerful mobile processors available, while the GPU's 53rd percentile ranking places it in the middle of the pack. The overall tier of the system is determined by the combined percentile of 71, which indicates it is a solidly above-average laptop, but not a high-end gaming machine. It is a versatile system that excels at CPU-bound tasks like content creation and software development, but it is not designed for serious gaming.

The CPU's 8 cores and 16 threads, combined with a 5.00 GHz boost clock, make it a powerhouse for productivity. The 256.0 GB/s memory bandwidth is a key feature, providing fast data access for both the CPU and the shared GPU. The Radeon 740M, with its 256 shading units and 2.867 TFLOPS, is sufficient for basic graphics and light gaming, but it is not a gaming GPU. The build is best described as a high-performance productivity laptop that can handle casual gaming on the side.

Who Should Build It

This system is ideal for professionals and students who prioritize CPU performance over GPU performance. Software developers will benefit from the high integer math score (107,046) and 16 threads, which speed up compilation and code analysis. Data scientists and researchers will appreciate the floating-point math score (71,105) and data compression score (406,505) for processing large datasets. Content creators who work with video editing or 3D rendering in CPU-based applications will find the Cinebench R23 multi-core score of 15,674 to be highly useful, allowing for faster exports and renders.

Students and office workers will experience a highly responsive system for everyday tasks, thanks to the single-thread score of 4,060. The 88th CPU percentile ensures that multitasking, such as running multiple virtual machines or having dozens of browser tabs open, will not cause slowdowns. Gamers, however, should look elsewhere. The Radeon 740M's 53rd percentile ranking means that gaming will be limited to esports titles at 1080p or older AAA games at low settings. For high-refresh gaming or 1440p gaming, a dedicated GPU is necessary. This build is not for gamers who want to play the latest titles at high settings; it is for users who need a powerful CPU for work and can tolerate occasional light gaming.

Upgrade Path and Platform

The CPU uses the AMD Socket FP11, which is a mobile-specific socket. This means the CPU is likely soldered to the motherboard, and upgrading the CPU is not a practical option. The memory support is LPDDR5X, which is also typically soldered on laptops. Therefore, the upgrade path for this system is limited to storage and potentially the GPU, depending on the laptop's design. The CPU supports PCIe Gen 4 with 16 lanes (CPU only), which provides high-speed connectivity for NVMe SSDs and external GPUs. The GPU uses PCIe 4.0 x8, so it can be paired with an external GPU enclosure via a compatible port, but this is not a standard laptop feature.

The CPU's TDP is 55 W, and the GPU's TDP is 45 W, so the total system power draw is around 100 W, excluding other components. The suggested PSU is null in the data, but for a laptop, this is not applicable. The CPU supports ECC memory, which is a feature typically found in workstation or server CPUs. This makes the system suitable for data integrity-critical applications. A sensible next upgrade would be to ensure the system has fast LPDDR5X memory, as the GPU's performance is system-dependent. Upgrading to a larger NVMe SSD would also improve load times for applications and games. For those who need more graphics performance, an external GPU enclosure would be the only viable path, but this is not a typical upgrade for a laptop. The platform is designed for a long lifespan, with the CPU being an active production part, but the socket is not upgradeable.

Rate My PC: AMD Ryzen AI Max 385 + AMD Radeon 740M

Apex Performer

System Balance Analysis

AMD Ryzen AI Max 385

AMD Radeon 740M

Market Position

Game Performance Benchmarks

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

Performance Insights

Optimal Performance

4K Gaming Ready

Performance Tiers Explained

Ultimate

High-End

Mid-Range

Entry Level

Legacy

CPU Analysis

Balance and Bottleneck

Usage Scenarios

Gaming Performance

FAQ

GPU Analysis

Benchmark Performance

Build Overview

Who Should Build It

Upgrade Path and Platform

4K Gaming Performance

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

1440p Gaming Performance

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

1080p Gaming Performance

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

Related Processors

Related Graphics Cards

Compare Your CPU

Compare Your GPU

Related PC Builds

Same CPU with Different GPUs

Same GPU with Different CPUs

Other Popular Builds