SYSTEM ANALYZER

Rate My PC: AMD Ryzen AI Embedded P185 + NVIDIA RTX 5000 Max-Q Ada Generation

Get a comprehensive performance analysis of your gaming rig with detailed benchmarks, bottleneck detection, and upgrade recommendations

Build Configuration

Select your components

PROCESSOR (CPU)

▼

GRAPHICS CARD (GPU)

▼

85 Score

Top 15% Ranking

85 / 100

HIGH-END

Power Build

Top 15% of systems. Excellent for 1440p Ultra or 4K High gaming.

1440p Ultra4K High

System Balance Analysis

CPU vs GPU performance ratio

GPU Bottleneck

CPU

96%

GPU

74%

Your GPU is limiting system performance. Consider upgrading to a more powerful graphics card to better utilize your CPU.

PROCESSOR

AMD Ryzen AI Embedded P185

62,839 Benchmark Score

Top 4% Market Ranking

View Full Specs →

GRAPHICS CARD

NVIDIA RTX 5000 Max-Q Ada Generation

0 Benchmark Score

Top 26% Market Ranking

View Full Specs →

Market Position

How your build compares to others

Budget

0-30

Mid-Range

30-60

High-End

60-85

Enthusiast

85-100

Your Build

Game Performance Benchmarks

Real-world 4K FPS in popular titles

View All Games →

Performance Insights

Tips to maximize your system

Strong Performance

Excellent for 1440p gaming. Most games will run at high/ultra settings smoothly.

Bottleneck Detected

GPU Bottleneck - Upgrading the weaker component will improve overall performance.

Compatible Games See what you can play Compare CPUs Find upgrades Compare GPUs Find upgrades

Performance Tiers Explained

90-100

Ultimate

4K Ultra gaming, VR ready, ray tracing enabled, professional workloads

4K 60+ FPS VR Ready

70-89

High-End

1440p Ultra or 4K High settings, excellent for modern AAA titles

1440p Ultra 4K High

50-69

Mid-Range

1080p Ultra or 1440p Medium, great value for most gamers

1080p Ultra 1440p Med

30-49

Entry Level

1080p Medium settings, suitable for eSports and older titles

1080p Med eSports

0-29

Legacy

Basic gaming, older titles, consider upgrading for modern games

720p-1080p Low Older Games

The AMD Ryzen AI Embedded P185 and NVIDIA RTX 5000 Max-Q Ada Generation form a laptop-class pairing that sits in the 72nd combined percentile, indicating a system positioned for serious productivity and high-end creative work rather than absolute top-tier gaming or compute. The CPU is a 12-core, 24-thread processor based on the Gorgon Point architecture, built on TSMC's 4 nm process, while the GPU is a 16 GB Ada Lovelace professional mobile part. This is a pairing where the processor is the standout performer, holding a 93rd percentile ranking among all CPUs, while the graphics card sits at the median 50th percentile, creating a distinct performance dynamic that favors CPU-bound tasks.

GPU Analysis — VRAM, bandwidth, clocks, RT/tensor hardware, what the benchmark scores mean for rendering

The NVIDIA RTX 5000 Max-Q Ada Generation is built on the AD103 chip using a 5 nm process from TSMC, packing 45,900 million transistors across a 379 mm² die. The GPU operates at a base clock of 930 MHz with a boost clock of 1680 MHz, which is conservative for a mobile workstation part, reflecting the Max-Q design's emphasis on power efficiency over raw clock speed. The memory subsystem is notably strong: 16 GB of GDDR6 memory on a 256-bit bus delivers 576.0 GB/s of bandwidth, with the memory clocked at 2250 MHz or 18 Gbps effective. This memory configuration is substantial for a laptop GPU and is well-suited for large texture sets, high-resolution renders, and deep learning model weights that exceed the capacity of lower-tier mobile parts.

The compute resources are extensive. The GPU features 9728 shading units, 304 texture mapping units, and 112 raster output pipelines. For ray tracing and AI acceleration, it includes 76 dedicated RT cores and 304 tensor cores. These deliver pixel rate of 188.2 GPixel/s and texture rate of 510.7 GTexel/s. The FP32 throughput is 32.69 TFLOPS, with FP16 matching at 32.69 TFLOPS (1:1 ratio), meaning the card does not gain a throughput advantage in half-precision workloads. This is relevant for machine learning inference where FP16 is common—the performance scales linearly rather than doubling, which is a consideration for developers working with neural networks.

The API support is current: DirectX 12 Ultimate (12_2), OpenGL 4.6, and Vulkan 1.4, ensuring compatibility with modern rendering engines and game titles. The GPU has a TDP of 120 W, which is the thermal envelope for the whole Max-Q package, and it uses no external power connectors, drawing power entirely through the motherboard interface. The bus interface is PCIe 4.0 x16, which matches the CPU's PCIe Gen 4 support, allowing for full-bandwidth communication between the two processors.

The GPU's 50th percentile ranking among all GPUs indicates it is an average performer in the broader graphics landscape. This is not a top-tier gaming GPU like a desktop flagship, but it is a professional part with 16 GB of VRAM that will handle rendering tasks where memory capacity and driver optimization for workstation applications matter more than raw rasterization speed. The absence of benchmark scores for this GPU in the data pack means we cannot quantify its performance against rivals, but the hardware specifications alone suggest it is capable of solid 1080p and 1440p gaming, with the 16 GB buffer providing headroom for high-resolution textures and multi-app workflows.

Benchmark Performance — exact CPU and GPU scores, percentile positions, and what the combined picture is

The CPU benchmarks are extensive and reveal a processor that punches above its 28 W TDP class. The PassMark multi-thread score is 31817, which places the chip in the 93rd percentile of all CPUs. This is a strong result for a mobile processor, indicating it can handle heavily threaded workloads with ease. The single-thread score is 3977, a figure that is competitive for modern laptop parts and suggests responsive day-to-day performance and solid gaming frame pacing in CPU-bound scenarios.

The CPU's average benchmark score is 62839, and the nearest rivals show a tight cluster: the Intel Core Ultra 7 255HX scores 62738 (0.2% behind), the Intel Core i7-13790F scores 63080 (0.4% ahead), the Intel Core Ultra 7 265HX scores 63173 (0.5% ahead), and the AMD Ryzen AI 9 PRO 465 scores 62498 (0.5% behind). This puts the P185 in a narrow band where performance differences are within noise, meaning real-world application performance will be nearly identical to these competitors. The data shows the P185 is not an outlier; it is a well-rounded processor that trades blows with the best of Intel's and AMD's mobile and desktop mid-range offerings.

Specific benchmark components show the CPU's strengths. PassMark integer math scores 117832, floating point math scores 70587, and extended instructions score 26544, all indicating strong compute throughput for scientific and engineering workloads. Data compression scores 374429, which is exceptionally high, suggesting excellent performance in archiving and file compression tasks. Data encryption scores 19612, a moderate figure that reflects the lack of dedicated encryption acceleration beyond standard instructions. Find prime numbers scores 129, and random string sorting scores 40557, both reasonable for the class. Physics score is 1772, which is a more modest result and may indicate that the chip's power management under sustained load is not optimized for continuous high-intensity physics calculations.

The GPU has no benchmark scores in the data pack, making its performance characterization entirely dependent on the 50th percentile ranking and the hardware specifications. The combined percentile for the system is 72, which is a holistic measure of the CPU and GPU together. The gap between the CPU's 93rd percentile and the GPU's 50th percentile is the defining feature of this pairing: the processor is far more capable relative to its peers than the graphics card is. This means the system is CPU-limited in many tasks, but the GPU is not a bottleneck for productivity work where the CPU is the primary driver.

CPU Analysis — cores, clocks, architecture, what the benchmark scores mean for real workloads

The AMD Ryzen AI Embedded P185 is a 12-core, 24-thread processor with a base clock of 2.00 GHz and a boost clock of 5.10 GHz. It uses the Gorgon Point codename and is part of the Ryzen AI Embedded generation, which is based on a hybrid Zen 5 / Zen 5c architecture. The process node is 4 nm from TSMC, and the die size is 233 mm². The cache hierarchy consists of 80 KB of L1 per core, 1 MB of L2 per core, and a total of 16 MB of L3 cache. This is not a large L3 pool by modern standards—many desktop chips have 32 MB or more—but for a mobile part at 28 W TDP, it is adequate.

The memory support includes DDR5 and LPDDR5X, with a dual-channel memory bus that provides 89.6 GB/s of bandwidth. ECC memory support is enabled, which is critical for workstation reliability in scientific computing, financial modeling, and server-like workloads where data integrity is paramount. The CPU provides 16 PCIe Gen 4 lanes, which is sufficient for the GPU and a couple of NVMe SSDs, but not for extensive expansion. The integrated graphics is a Radeon 890M, which is a capable iGPU for basic display output and light 2D tasks, but it is not intended for gaming or heavy compute.

The socket is AMD Socket FP8, which is a mobile platform, and the chip is not multiplier unlocked, meaning it cannot be overclocked. The production status is active, with a release date of February 28, 2026, making it a recent part at the time of this analysis.

The benchmark scores translate to real workload performance as follows. The multi-thread score of 31817 indicates the chip can handle video encoding, 3D rendering, and software compilation with ease. For example, a video editor working with 4K footage will see responsive timeline scrubbing and fast export times, though the GPU's 50th percentile rank will limit GPU-accelerated effects. The single-thread score of 3977 means office applications, web browsing, and coding in an IDE will feel snappy, with no perceptible lag in everyday tasks. The data compression score of 374429 is particularly impressive—this is a top-tier result that will make large file transfers and backups significantly faster than typical laptop processors.

The find prime numbers score of 129 is low, which can indicate that the chip's integer throughput in single-threaded prime sieving is not its strong suit, but this is a synthetic workload that rarely maps to real-world use. The extended instructions score of 26544 suggests good AVX-512 or similar vectorized performance, which benefits scientific simulations and cryptography. Overall, the CPU is a high-end mobile processor that competes with desktop mid-range chips in multi-threaded tasks, making it suitable for professional workloads that can leverage 24 threads.

Balance and Bottleneck — which component limits which workload, using percentiles and FPS scaling as evidence

The system's balance is heavily skewed toward the CPU. With the CPU at the 93rd percentile and the GPU at the 50th percentile, the graphics card is the clear limiting factor in any workload that relies on the GPU. In gaming, this means the GPU will dictate maximum frame rates and resolution capabilities. A game running at 1080p with high settings will likely be GPU-bound, meaning the CPU will be waiting for the GPU to finish rendering each frame. The 16 GB VRAM is ample for modern titles, but the raw compute power of the GPU is only average, so frame rates will be modest compared to a system with a higher-percentile GPU.

In CPU-bound workloads, such as software compilation, data analysis, or spreadsheet manipulation, the CPU is the star, and the GPU is mostly idle. The 93rd percentile CPU will handle these tasks with ease, and the GPU's 50th percentile is irrelevant. For rendering tasks like Blender or Maya, the balance is more complex: the CPU handles geometry and physics, while the GPU handles shading and ray tracing. The CPU's strong multi-thread score will accelerate the CPU portions, but the GPU's RT cores (76 of them) will process ray-traced frames at a rate consistent with its 50th percentile rank. The result is a system that is faster than average for hybrid CPU+GPU rendering but will not compete with dedicated high-end desktop GPUs.

The FPS scaling evidence is not available because there is no measured FPS data for this combination. However, the percentile gap alone is sufficient to conclude that the GPU is the bottleneck in any GPU-intensive scenario. For a user who prioritizes gaming, this is not an ideal pairing—a lower-end CPU with a higher-end GPU would yield better frame rates. For a user who prioritizes multi-threaded productivity, the pairing is excellent, as the GPU is sufficient for display output and light acceleration without being a limiting factor in CPU-driven tasks.

The 28 W TDP of the CPU and the 120 W TDP of the GPU combine to a total system power draw that is moderate for a laptop. The GPU's Max-Q design is specifically engineered to fit within a mobile thermal envelope, which means sustained gaming or rendering will not cause excessive throttling, but the performance is capped by the power limits. The data shows a system that is well-matched for professional work where the CPU is the primary compute engine, but where the GPU is a secondary accelerator rather than the main event.

Who Should Build It — target users and industries (gamers at specific resolutions, content creators, developers, students, small business workstations) tied strictly to the measured performance

This system is built for professionals and prosumers who need a high-core-count CPU in a laptop form factor, with a GPU that is capable of supporting their workflow without being a bottleneck for CPU-centric tasks. The 93rd percentile CPU makes it ideal for software developers who compile large codebases, data scientists who run complex models, and engineers who use simulation tools that rely on multi-threaded processing. The ECC memory support adds a layer of reliability that is critical for financial analysts, scientific researchers, and anyone whose work cannot tolerate silent data corruption.

Content creators who work primarily with CPU-based rendering will benefit from the 12 cores and 24 threads. Video editors using software encoders, 3D artists using CPU-based physics simulations, and photographers processing large batches of RAW images will see strong performance. The 16 GB GPU VRAM is a bonus for those who do light GPU-accelerated work, such as previewing renders or applying AI-based filters, but the GPU's 50th percentile rank means they should not expect flagship-level GPU performance.

For students, this is a premium machine that will handle any academic workload, from programming assignments to research papers. The single-thread score of 3977 ensures smooth operation of office suites and web-based research tools. The battery life implications of the 28 W CPU and 120 W GPU are not specified, but the power draw is reasonable for a performance laptop, making it suitable for a full day of classes if the battery is appropriately sized.

Small business workstations for accounting, legal, or consulting firms will find the 93rd percentile CPU to be overkill for basic office tasks, but it provides headroom for future software demands and allows multiple virtual machines to run concurrently. The GPU is sufficient for driving multiple 4K displays, though the display outputs are listed as "Portable Device Dependent," meaning the number and type of outputs vary by the laptop design.

Gamers should note that this is not a gaming-first system. The 50th percentile GPU will handle 1080p gaming at medium to high settings in most titles, but it will not deliver high refresh rates at 1440p or 4K. The CPU is more than capable of feeding the GPU, but the GPU is the limiting factor for frame rates. This is a system for work first and gaming second, where the gaming experience is competent but not exceptional.

Usage Scenarios — grounded in the scores: high-refresh gaming, streaming, video editing, 3D rendering, software development, student and office work. One short paragraph per scenario, citing the numbers that support the verdict

High-refresh gaming: With the GPU at the 50th percentile, high-refresh 144Hz gaming at 1080p is achievable in esports titles with lowered settings, but AAA games will typically run in the 60-90 FPS range. The CPU's single-thread score of 3977 ensures the processor is not a bottleneck, but the GPU's 32.69 TFLOPS of FP32 compute is average for the class. The 16 GB VRAM is sufficient for high-resolution textures, so users can expect a playable but not spectacular gaming experience.

Streaming: The CPU's 24 threads are well-suited for software encoding while gaming, as the multi-thread score of 31817 provides ample headroom for x264 encoding at high bitrates. The GPU's NVENC encoder is not benchmarked in the data, but the hardware is present. The system can handle a single-PC streaming setup with the CPU encoding and the GPU rendering, though the GPU's 50th percentile rank will cap the in-game frame rates.

Video editing: The multi-thread score of 31817 and the data compression score of 374429 indicate fast export times and smooth timeline editing for 4K footage. The GPU's 576.0 GB/s memory bandwidth and 16 GB VRAM accelerate effects and color grading, but the 50th percentile rank means GPU-accelerated effects will not be as fast as a high-end desktop GPU. The ECC memory support is a plus for long rendering sessions where stability is paramount.

3D rendering: The CPU will handle viewport navigation and physics simulation with ease, given the 12 cores and 24 threads. The GPU's 76 RT cores and 304 tensor cores provide hardware acceleration for ray tracing and denoising, respectively. The FP32 and FP16 both at 32.69 TFLOPS means the GPU is equally capable in single and half precision, which is useful for AI-based denoisers. The 16 GB VRAM allows for complex scenes that exceed 8 GB, which is a common limitation on consumer cards.

Software development: The 93rd percentile CPU is the standout feature here. Compilation times will be short, and the 24 threads allow for parallel builds. The single-thread score of 3977 ensures that IDE interactions are responsive. The 89.6 GB/s memory bandwidth is adequate for large in-memory data structures. Docker containers and virtual machines will run concurrently without performance degradation, thanks to the high multi-thread score.

Student and office work: This is a powerful machine for students, but it is more than necessary for standard office tasks. The single-thread score of 3977 makes word processing and spreadsheet work instant. The 28 W CPU TDP means the laptop can run cool and quiet during light loads. The GPU is overkill for office work, but it enables students to use GPU-accelerated tools for machine learning or 3D modeling courses without needing a separate desktop.

FAQ — 5-7 Q&A pairs answerable from FACT PACK data (format: Q: ... A: ...)

Q: What is the CPU's core and thread count?

A: The AMD Ryzen AI Embedded P185 has 12 cores and 24 threads, with a base clock of 2.00 GHz and a boost clock of 5.10 GHz.

Q: How much VRAM does the GPU have, and what is its memory bandwidth?

A: The NVIDIA RTX 5000 Max-Q Ada Generation has 16 GB of GDDR6 memory on a 256-bit bus, delivering 576.0 GB/s of bandwidth.

Q: What is the CPU's performance percentile compared to all other CPUs?

A: The CPU ranks in the 93rd percentile of all CPUs, with an average benchmark score of 62839.

Q: Does the system support ECC memory?

A: Yes, the CPU supports ECC memory, which is a critical feature for professional workloads requiring high data integrity.

Q: What is the combined performance percentile of the CPU and GPU pairing?

A: The combined percentile is 72, indicating the system is above average overall, but the CPU's 93rd percentile far exceeds the GPU's 50th percentile.

Q: What is the process node for the CPU and GPU?

A: The CPU is built on TSMC's 4 nm process, while the GPU is built on TSMC's 5 nm process.

Q: Is the GPU's FP16 performance higher than its FP32 performance?

A: No, the FP16 and FP32 performance are identical at 32.69 TFLOPS (1:1 ratio), so the GPU does not gain a throughput advantage in half-precision workloads.

Upgrade Path and Platform — socket, memory support, PCIe, PSU headroom from suggestedPsu/tdp, what a sensible next upgrade looks like

The platform is based on the AMD Socket FP8, which is a mobile socket that is not upgradeable in the traditional sense—the CPU is soldered to the motherboard, and there is no ability to swap it for a different processor. The memory support includes DDR5 and LPDDR5X, with a dual-channel bus, and the system supports up to the memory bandwidth of 89.6 GB/s as specified. The CPU provides 16 PCIe Gen 4 lanes, which are used by the GPU via a PCIe 4.0 x16 connection. This is a modern interface with sufficient bandwidth for the RTX 5000 Max-Q, though it is not the newer PCIe Gen 5 standard.

The GPU has a TDP of 120 W and the CPU has a TDP of 28 W, for a combined thermal envelope of 148 W. The suggested PSU is not provided in the data, but the power connectors on the GPU are listed as "None," meaning it draws power from the motherboard. This is typical for a Max-Q laptop GPU, and there is no user-serviceable PSU upgrade path in a laptop. The power delivery is fixed by the laptop's design, so the "upgrade path" here is not about increasing power but about optimizing the existing hardware.

A sensible next upgrade for the GPU would be a move to a higher-percentile part, such as a non-Max-Q variant of the RTX 5000 or a Blackwell-MW successor, which is listed as the successor architecture to Ada-MW. However, this would require a new laptop because the GPU is not user-replaceable. For the CPU, a next upgrade would be a future generation of the Ryzen AI Embedded series with more cores or a higher clock speed, but again, this is a motherboard-level change.

The practical upgrade path is in memory and storage. Users can add more DDR5 or LPDDR5X memory, up to the limits of the laptop's slots, and upgrade the NVMe SSD to a larger or faster model. The 16 PCIe Gen 4 lanes from the CPU can support multiple NVMe drives if the laptop has the physical slots. The ECC memory support means users can choose ECC RAM for higher reliability, though this is not a performance upgrade. The platform is closed and mobile, so the only realistic upgrades are memory and storage, not the core processors.

Build Overview — what this CPU+GPU pairing is, its class (desktop/laptop from buildClass), and overall tier from the percentiles

This is a laptop-class build, as indicated by the buildClass field. It pairs the AMD Ryzen AI Embedded P185, a 12-core/24-thread mobile processor, with the NVIDIA RTX 5000 Max-Q Ada Generation, a 16 GB professional laptop GPU. The combined percentile is 72, which places this system in the upper-middle tier of all laptop configurations. The CPU's 93rd percentile is the defining feature, making this a CPU-centric workstation laptop that excels at multi-threaded productivity tasks. The GPU's 50th percentile is average, so the system is not a gaming powerhouse, but it has enough graphics power for professional rendering and light gaming.

The build class is mobile, meaning it is designed for portability, and the 28 W CPU TDP and 120 W GPU TDP suggest a laptop that is not ultra-thin but is reasonable for a performance workstation. The absence of measured FPS data means we cannot provide specific gaming performance numbers, but the hardware specifications allow for estimated performance. This pairing is best described as a "productivity-first" laptop, where the CPU is overqualified for most tasks and the GPU is sufficient for the majority of professional graphics workloads. It is a system for someone who values computational throughput over graphical frame rates, and it is well-suited for developers, engineers, and scientists who need a powerful processor in a portable form factor.

Gaming Performance — measured FPS by game and resolution from measuredFpsUltraByGame (or, if dataIsMeasured is false, frame expectations qualitatively from the benchmark scores and say the figures are estimates)

No measured FPS rows exist for this exact combination, and the FACT PACK contains no measuredFps data. Therefore, all gaming performance figures presented here are estimates based on the CPU and GPU benchmark scores and hardware specifications, not measured results.

At 1080p with ultra settings, the GPU's 50th percentile rank suggests that most modern AAA games will run at 60 FPS or slightly above, with some titles dipping below 60 FPS in demanding scenes. The CPU's single-thread score of 3977 ensures that the processor will not cause frame drops, so the GPU is the sole limiting factor. Esports titles like Counter-Strike or Valorant, which are less GPU-intensive, could reach 100+ FPS, but the lack of specific game benchmarks means these are rough estimates.

At 1440p, the GPU's 16 GB VRAM and 576.0 GB/s bandwidth are sufficient, but the compute power is average, so frame rates will likely drop to 45-60 FPS in AAA titles. The 32.69 TFLOPS of FP32 compute is not enough for high-refresh 1440p gaming in the latest titles. At 4K, the GPU is not well-suited for ultra settings; users would need to lower settings to medium or high to achieve playable frame rates above 30 FPS. The 50th percentile ranking means this GPU is not a 4K gaming part.

The RT cores (76) and tensor cores (304) provide hardware support for ray tracing and DLSS, but the GPU's overall performance is average, so enabling ray tracing will likely reduce frame rates below playable thresholds in many titles. The CPU's 93rd percentile is a non-factor in gaming, as even lower-end CPUs can feed a 50th percentile GPU at 1080p. In summary, this system is a competent 1080p gaming laptop, a moderate 1440p machine, and a poor 4K gaming system. Users who prioritize gaming should look elsewhere, but for occasional gaming between work sessions, it will suffice.

Rate My PC: AMD Ryzen AI Embedded P185 + NVIDIA RTX 5000 Max-Q Ada Generation

Power Build

System Balance Analysis

AMD Ryzen AI Embedded P185

NVIDIA RTX 5000 Max-Q Ada Generation

Market Position

Game Performance Benchmarks

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

Performance Insights

Strong Performance

Bottleneck Detected

Performance Tiers Explained

Ultimate

High-End

Mid-Range

Entry Level

Legacy

GPU Analysis — VRAM, bandwidth, clocks, RT/tensor hardware, what the benchmark scores mean for rendering

Benchmark Performance — exact CPU and GPU scores, percentile positions, and what the combined picture is

CPU Analysis — cores, clocks, architecture, what the benchmark scores mean for real workloads

Balance and Bottleneck — which component limits which workload, using percentiles and FPS scaling as evidence

Who Should Build It — target users and industries (gamers at specific resolutions, content creators, developers, students, small business workstations) tied strictly to the measured performance

Usage Scenarios — grounded in the scores: high-refresh gaming, streaming, video editing, 3D rendering, software development, student and office work. One short paragraph per scenario, citing the numbers that support the verdict

FAQ — 5-7 Q&A pairs answerable from FACT PACK data (format: Q: ... A: ...)

Upgrade Path and Platform — socket, memory support, PCIe, PSU headroom from suggestedPsu/tdp, what a sensible next upgrade looks like

Build Overview — what this CPU+GPU pairing is, its class (desktop/laptop from buildClass), and overall tier from the percentiles

Gaming Performance — measured FPS by game and resolution from measuredFpsUltraByGame (or, if dataIsMeasured is false, frame expectations qualitatively from the benchmark scores and say the figures are estimates)

4K Gaming Performance

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

1440p Gaming Performance

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

1080p Gaming Performance

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

Related Processors

Related Graphics Cards

Compare Your CPU

Compare Your GPU

Related PC Builds

Same CPU with Different GPUs

Same GPU with Different CPUs

Other Popular Builds