SYSTEM ANALYZER

Rate My PC: AMD Ryzen AI Embedded P185 + NVIDIA RTX 3000 Mobile Ada Generation

Get a comprehensive performance analysis of your gaming rig with detailed benchmarks, bottleneck detection, and upgrade recommendations

85 / 100
HIGH-END

Power Build

Top 15% of systems. Excellent for 1440p Ultra or 4K High gaming.

1440p Ultra4K High

System Balance Analysis

CPU vs GPU performance ratio
GPU Bottleneck
CPU
96%
VS
GPU
74%

Your GPU is limiting system performance. Consider upgrading to a more powerful graphics card to better utilize your CPU.

PROCESSOR

AMD Ryzen AI Embedded P185

62,839 Benchmark Score
Top 4% Market Ranking
View Full Specs →
GRAPHICS CARD

NVIDIA RTX 3000 Mobile Ada Generation

0 Benchmark Score
Top 26% Market Ranking
View Full Specs →

Market Position

How your build compares to others
Budget
0-30
Mid-Range
30-60
High-End
60-85
Enthusiast
85-100
Your Build

Game Performance Benchmarks

Real-world 4K FPS in popular titles
View All Games →

Performance Insights

Tips to maximize your system

Strong Performance

Excellent for 1440p gaming. Most games will run at high/ultra settings smoothly.

Bottleneck Detected

GPU Bottleneck - Upgrading the weaker component will improve overall performance.

Compatible Games See what you can play Compare CPUs Find upgrades Compare GPUs Find upgrades

Performance Tiers Explained

90-100

Ultimate

4K Ultra gaming, VR ready, ray tracing enabled, professional workloads

4K 60+ FPS VR Ready
70-89

High-End

1440p Ultra or 4K High settings, excellent for modern AAA titles

1440p Ultra 4K High
50-69

Mid-Range

1080p Ultra or 1440p Medium, great value for most gamers

1080p Ultra 1440p Med
30-49

Entry Level

1080p Medium settings, suitable for eSports and older titles

1080p Med eSports
0-29

Legacy

Basic gaming, older titles, consider upgrading for modern games

720p-1080p Low Older Games

The AMD Ryzen AI Embedded P185 and NVIDIA RTX 3000 Mobile Ada Generation form a laptop-class pairing with a combined percentile of 72. The CPU ranks in the 93rd percentile among all CPUs with an average benchmark score of 62,839, while the GPU sits at the 50th percentile among all GPUs. No measured FPS rows exist for this exact combination — the FACT PACK contains no measuredFps data — so all frame-rate discussion below is estimated from benchmark scores.

FAQ

Q: What is the combined performance percentile of this CPU+GPU pair?

A: The pairing lands at the 72nd percentile overall, with the CPU contributing a 93rd-percentile rank and the GPU a 50th-percentile rank.

Q: How does the CPU compare to its nearest rivals?

A: The P185 scores 62,839 on average. It is 0.2% ahead of the Intel Core Ultra 7 255HX (62,738) and 0.5% ahead of the AMD Ryzen AI 9 PRO 465 (62,498), but 0.4% behind the Intel Core i7-13790F (63,080) and 0.5% behind the Intel Core Ultra 7 265HX (63,173).

Q: What memory support does the CPU offer?

A: DDR5 and LPDDR5X, dual-channel, with 89.6 GB/s of bandwidth and ECC support.

Q: What is the GPU's memory configuration?

A: 8 GB of GDDR6 on a 128-bit bus, delivering 256.0 GB/s of bandwidth.

Q: What is the GPU's raw compute throughput?

A: The RTX 3000 Mobile Ada provides 15.62 TFLOPS FP32 and 15.62 TFLOPS FP16, with 36 RT cores and 144 tensor cores.

Q: What process node is the CPU built on?

A: TSMC's 4 nm process, with a die size of 233 mm².

Q: What is the CPU's single-thread score?

A: The Passmark single-thread score is 3,977, a strong result for a mobile chip with a 28W TDP.

Benchmark Performance

The data shows a CPU that punches well above its weight class and a GPU that sits exactly in the middle of the pack. The Ryzen AI Embedded P185 posts an average benchmark score of 62,839, ranking in the 93rd percentile of all CPUs. That places it in the upper echelon of mobile processors. Its nearest rivals are tightly clustered: the Intel Core Ultra 7 255HX scores 62,738 (0.2% behind), the AMD Ryzen AI 9 PRO 465 scores 62,498 (0.5% behind), the Intel Core i7-13790F scores 63,080 (0.4% ahead), and the Intel Core Ultra 7 265HX scores 63,173 (0.5% ahead). The P185 trades blows with all of them — the differences are within a rounding error, and the 93rd percentile reflects a competitive positioning.

The GPU tells a different story. The RTX 3000 Mobile Ada Generation has no benchmark score recorded in the FACT PACK — its average benchmark score is 0 — and sits at the 50th percentile among all GPUs. This means it is exactly average, neither a standout nor a weak link. The combined percentile of 72 is dragged down by the GPU's mid-pack standing. The data suggests the CPU is the dominant half of this pairing, and the GPU is the limiting factor in GPU-bound workloads.

CPU Analysis

The P185 is a 12-core, 24-thread mobile processor with a base clock of 2.00 GHz and a boost clock of 5.10 GHz. It uses the "Gorgon Point" codename and the Ryzen AI Embedded generation, which mixes Zen 5 and Zen 5c cores. The process node is TSMC's 4nm with a 233 mm² die. The cache hierarchy is 80 KB L1 per core, 1 MB L2 per core, and 16 MB of shared L3. The TDP is a modest 28W, which is low for a 12-core part — the data suggests the 4nm process and core architecture deliver performance without a high power draw.

The benchmark scores reveal a chip that excels at integer-heavy work but is comparatively weaker in floating-point physics. The integer math score is 117,832, while floating-point math hits 70,587. Data compression is a standout at 374,429, and data encryption reaches 19,612. Extended instructions score 26,544, and random string sorting is 40,557. The multithread score is 31,817, and the single-thread score is 3,977. The physics score of 1,772 is notably lower, suggesting the Zen 5c cores do not fully accelerate physics simulations. The 16 MB L3 is shared across all cores, and the dual-channel memory bus provides 89.6 GB/s of bandwidth, which is enough to feed 24 threads in most workloads.

The single-thread score of 3,977 is the key for responsiveness. A high single-thread result is critical for older software, lightly threaded applications, and everyday desktop tasks. The 28W TDP means the chip can sustain these scores without a large thermal solution, which is a significant advantage for a laptop.

Usage Scenarios

High-refresh gaming: The CPU is more than capable of pushing high frame rates, with a single-thread score of 3,977 and a multithread score of 31,817. The GPU, however, is the limiting factor. A 50th-percentile GPU with 8 GB of VRAM and 15.62 TFLOPS FP32 will handle 1080p esports titles and medium settings in AAA games, but it will not sustain high refresh rates at maximum detail. The CPU will not be the bottleneck in most games — the GPU will be.

Streaming: The 12-core, 24-thread CPU with a multithread score of 31,817 can handle the encoding and streaming overhead while the game runs. The 28W TDP keeps thermals in check during long streams. The GPU's mid-pack position means game-side encoding will be the limiting factor, but the CPU is ready to handle the load.

Video editing: The integer math score of 117,832 and the multithread score of 31,817 indicate strong performance for codecs and filter operations. The GPU's 15.62 TFLOPS and 8 GB of VRAM can accelerate previews and effects in compatible software, but the 50th-percentile ranking means it will not be a top-tier accelerator. The 256 GB/s bandwidth is adequate for 1080p timelines and light 4K work.

3D rendering: The GPU delivers 15.62 TFLOPS FP32 and 36 RT cores, which is a solid mid-range renderer. The 8 GB VRAM is a constraint for large scenes. The CPU's 24 threads and 16 MB L3 handle viewport and simulation tasks well. The combined percentile of 72 suggests a mid-range rendering machine that will not compete with high-end desktops but will handle moderate scenes.

Software development: The 3,977 single-thread score and 117,832 integer math score make compilation and dependency resolution fast. The 89.6 GB/s memory bandwidth and 16 MB L3 cache are well-suited for build pipelines. The GPU is irrelevant for most development workloads, and the 28W TDP means a long battery life for on-the-go coding.

Student and office work: The 28W TDP means efficient operation, and the 93rd-percentile CPU handles browsers, office suites, and spreadsheets effortlessly. The 8 GB GPU is more than enough for any non-graphics office task. The integrated Radeon 890M iGPU could handle display output, while the RTX 3000 Mobile Ada Generation remains available for heavier compute when needed.

Gaming Performance

The benchmark scores provide the only basis for frame-rate expectations. The CPU at the 93rd percentile with a single-thread score of 3,977 is strong enough to feed the GPU in most games. The GPU at the 50th percentile with 8 GB of VRAM and 15.62 TFLOPS FP32 suggests that at 1080p, the GPU will be the limiting factor in most titles. Expect 1080p high-refresh in competitive shooters and medium settings in AAA games. At 1440p, the 256 GB/s bandwidth and 8 GB VRAM will force medium or low settings in demanding titles. The CPU will not be the bottleneck in gaming; the GPU will cap frame rates.

Who Should Build It

This pairing suits a user who wants a laptop with a strong CPU for compute-heavy tasks and a mid-range GPU for occasional gaming or light rendering. Content creators working on video editing or 3D modeling will benefit from the CPU's 93rd-percentile ranking, 24 threads, and 3,977 single-thread score. The GPU's 50th percentile is acceptable for previews and light rendering, but not for heavy GPU-accelerated work. Developers will appreciate the high single-thread and multithread scores for compilation and testing. Students and office users who want a responsive machine with a 28W TDP will find it efficient. It is not for a user who wants high-end gaming at 1440p or 4K with maximum settings, nor for a GPU-heavy rendering workstation.

Balance and Bottleneck

The data paints a clear picture. The CPU is at the 93rd percentile, the GPU at the 50th. The combined percentile is 72. In gaming, the GPU is the bottleneck — it will cap frame rates well before the CPU is stressed. The CPU's 3,977 single-thread score and 31,817 multithread score are far above what most games need. In CPU-bound workloads like compression or encryption, the CPU is the star and the GPU sits idle. In 3D rendering, the GPU is the primary engine, and the CPU supports the scene complexity. The 8 GB VRAM is the most likely constraint in GPU-bound tasks, and the 115W GPU TDP is the main power draw, while the 28W CPU TDP is negligible in comparison.

Build Overview

This is a laptop-class build. The AMD Ryzen AI Embedded P185 is a 12-core, 24-thread mobile CPU with a 28W TDP and a 93rd-percentile ranking. The NVIDIA RTX 3000 Mobile Ada Generation is a 50th-percentile GPU with 8 GB GDDR6 and 15.62 TFLOPS FP32. The combined percentile is 72. The CPU is the dominant half of the pairing, and the GPU is a mid-tier performer. This is a balanced laptop for compute-heavy workloads with modest gaming capability.

GPU Analysis

The RTX 3000 Mobile Ada Generation is built on the Ada Lovelace architecture, using the AD106 chip. It is manufactured on TSMC's 5nm process, with 22,900 million transistors on a 188 mm² die. The memory subsystem is 8 GB of GDDR6 on a 128-bit bus, delivering 256 GB/s of bandwidth. The shading units number 4,608, with 144 texture units and 48 ROPs. It has 36 RT cores and 144 tensor cores. The base clock is 1,395 MHz and the boost clock is 1,695 MHz, with the memory clock at 2,000 MHz and 16 Gbps effective. The FP32 and FP16 throughput are both 15.62 TFLOPS. The pixel rate is 81.36 GPixel/s and the texture rate is 244.1 GTexel/s. The TDP is 115W. The GPU supports DirectX 12 Ultimate (12_2), OpenGL 4.6, and Vulkan 1.4.

The 50th-percentile ranking shows this is an average GPU. The 8 GB VRAM is a moderate size, and the 128-bit bus is a constraint for high-resolution textures. The 15.62 TFLOPS FP32 is a mid-range compute figure. The RT and tensor cores are present, but the 50th percentile suggests they do not outperform the competition. This is not a top-tier mobile GPU, but it is a capable one.

Upgrade Path and Platform

The CPU uses the AMD Socket FP8, which is a laptop socket. The memory support is DDR5 and LPDDR5X, dual-channel, with 89.6 GB/s bandwidth and ECC support. The PCIe interface is Gen 4, with 16 lanes from the CPU. The GPU uses PCIe 4.0 x16 and is listed as an IGP slot, meaning it is integrated into the system — there is no discrete GPU upgrade path. The CPU TDP is 28W and the GPU TDP is 115W. The suggested PSU is null, so no PSU figure is available. As a laptop, the upgrade path is limited to memory and storage. The CPU is soldered, and the GPU is integrated. The most sensible next upgrade is to increase memory capacity, since the 89.6 GB/s bandwidth and dual-channel support are already in place. The platform is designed as a fixed-function mobile workstation, not a modular desktop.