SYSTEM ANALYZER

Rate My PC: AMD Ryzen AI Embedded P185 + NVIDIA Quadro RTX 5000 X2 Mobile

Get a comprehensive performance analysis of your gaming rig with detailed benchmarks, bottleneck detection, and upgrade recommendations

85 / 100
HIGH-END

Power Build

Top 15% of systems. Excellent for 1440p Ultra or 4K High gaming.

1440p Ultra4K High

System Balance Analysis

CPU vs GPU performance ratio
GPU Bottleneck
CPU
96%
VS
GPU
74%

Your GPU is limiting system performance. Consider upgrading to a more powerful graphics card to better utilize your CPU.

PROCESSOR

AMD Ryzen AI Embedded P185

62,839 Benchmark Score
Top 4% Market Ranking
View Full Specs →
GRAPHICS CARD

NVIDIA Quadro RTX 5000 X2 Mobile

0 Benchmark Score
Top 26% Market Ranking
View Full Specs →

Market Position

How your build compares to others
Budget
0-30
Mid-Range
30-60
High-End
60-85
Enthusiast
85-100
Your Build

Game Performance Benchmarks

Real-world 4K FPS in popular titles
View All Games →

Performance Insights

Tips to maximize your system

Strong Performance

Excellent for 1440p gaming. Most games will run at high/ultra settings smoothly.

Bottleneck Detected

GPU Bottleneck - Upgrading the weaker component will improve overall performance.

Compatible Games See what you can play Compare CPUs Find upgrades Compare GPUs Find upgrades

Performance Tiers Explained

90-100

Ultimate

4K Ultra gaming, VR ready, ray tracing enabled, professional workloads

4K 60+ FPS VR Ready
70-89

High-End

1440p Ultra or 4K High settings, excellent for modern AAA titles

1440p Ultra 4K High
50-69

Mid-Range

1080p Ultra or 1440p Medium, great value for most gamers

1080p Ultra 1440p Med
30-49

Entry Level

1080p Medium settings, suitable for eSports and older titles

1080p Med eSports
0-29

Legacy

Basic gaming, older titles, consider upgrading for modern games

720p-1080p Low Older Games

The AMD Ryzen AI Embedded P185 pairs a 12-core, 24-thread Zen 5 / Zen 5c based mobile processor with two NVIDIA Quadro RTX 5000 X2 GPUs in a laptop-class build. The CPU’s benchmark results place it in the 93rd percentile among all CPUs, while the GPU sits at the 50th percentile, and the combined configuration ranks in the 72nd percentile overall. No measured FPS data exists for this exact CPU+GPU combination, so all gaming performance discussion below is estimated from the benchmark scores rather than direct frame-rate measurements.

CPU Analysis

The AMD Ryzen AI Embedded P185 is built on Gorgon Point, a 4 nm TSMC process, with a 233 mm² die size. It offers 12 physical cores and 24 threads, with a base clock of 2.00 GHz and a boost clock of 5.10 GHz. The cache hierarchy includes 80 KB of L1 per core, 1 MB of L2 per core, and 16 MB of shared L3. This is a mobile-class processor with a 28 W TDP, supporting DDR5 and LPDDR5X memory over a dual-channel bus with 89.6 GB/s bandwidth, plus ECC memory support. The CPU provides PCIe Gen 4 with 16 lanes from the CPU itself, and it integrates a Radeon 890M graphics solution.

Benchmark results for this processor show a Passmark multi-thread score of 31,817, a single-thread score of 3,977, and an average benchmark score of 62,839. The processor’s percentile versus all CPUs is 93, meaning it outperforms the vast majority of processors in the database. Looking at specific workloads, the integer math score is 117,832, floating-point math is 70,587, extended instructions score 26,544, and data encryption scores 19,612. The Passmark data compression score is 374,429, which is notably high and suggests strong performance in compression and decompression tasks. Random string sorting scores 40,557, physics scores 1,772, and find prime numbers scores 129.

Compared to its nearest rivals, the P185 sits within a very tight band. The Intel Core Ultra 7 255HX has an average score of 62,738, which is 0.2% lower than the P185’s 62,839. The Intel Core i7-13790F scores 63,080, putting it 0.4% above the P185. The Intel Core Ultra 7 265HX averages 63,173, which is 0.5% higher. The AMD Ryzen AI 9 PRO 465 scores 62,498, 0.5% below the P185. In practical terms, the P185 is statistically indistinguishable from these rivals in aggregate performance, though specific workload differences may tilt favor in one direction or another.

For real-world workloads, the multi-thread score of 31,817 indicates solid parallel processing capability for tasks like video encoding, 3D rendering, and compilation, though it is not a flagship desktop-class number. The single-thread score of 3,977 is strong for a mobile chip, which benefits responsive daily use and lightly threaded applications. The high data compression score of 374,429 suggests the processor excels at archiving, file compression, and database operations that rely on such algorithms. The encryption score of 19,612 points to capable AES-NI performance for secure communications and disk encryption. The 28 W TDP means this processor is designed for power-efficient mobile systems, but the 5.10 GHz boost clock shows it can reach high frequencies when thermal and power budgets allow.

Usage Scenarios

High-refresh gaming: The CPU’s single-thread score of 3,977 and multi-thread score of 31,817 provide a strong foundation for gaming, but the GPU pair’s 50th percentile ranking limits the frame rates achievable at high settings. Estimated FPS for a 1080p high-refresh monitor would likely exceed 100 FPS in less demanding titles, while more graphically intensive games would fall below that threshold due to GPU constraints.

Streaming: The 12 cores and 24 threads, combined with a multi-thread score of 31,817, allow simultaneous game encoding and streaming without significant CPU bottlenecking. The encryption score of 19,612 also supports secure streaming protocols. The GPU’s 384 tensor cores and 48 RT cores can assist with encoding offload, though the GPU’s overall 50th percentile suggests moderate capability in this role.

Video editing: The CPU’s data compression score of 374,429 and integer math score of 117,832 help with codec operations and timeline scrubbing. The GPU’s 16 GB VRAM and 448.0 GB/s bandwidth provide ample memory for 4K video timelines, but the 9.400 TFLOPS FP32 performance is modest for complex effects and rendering. The combined 72nd percentile suggests adequate but not exceptional performance for professional video editing.

3D rendering: The CPU’s 24 threads and floating-point math score of 70,587 handle CPU-based rendering tasks reasonably well. The GPU’s 9.400 TFLOPS FP32 and 18.80 TFLOPS FP16 (2:1) support GPU-accelerated rendering, but the 50th percentile placement indicates it is not a top-tier renderer. For production workloads, this pairing would be workable for smaller projects or preview renders.

Software development: The multi-thread score of 31,817 and integer math score of 117,832 provide strong compilation throughput. The random string sorting score of 40,557 indicates good performance for text processing and parsing tasks common in development. The 16 MB L3 cache and 89.6 GB/s memory bandwidth support large codebases and build caches.

Student and office work: The single-thread score of 3,977 ensures responsive application launches and document editing. The 28 W TDP contributes to longer battery life in a laptop form factor. The integrated Radeon 890M GPU provides basic display output, while the discrete GPU pair is available for heavier workloads, making this a versatile but over-specified machine for typical student tasks.

Balance and Bottleneck

The benchmark data shows a clear imbalance between the CPU and GPU in this configuration. The CPU ranks in the 93rd percentile among all CPUs, while the GPU pair ranks only in the 50th percentile. This 43-percentage-point gap indicates that the CPU is far more capable relative to its peers than the GPU is relative to its own peers. In gaming workloads, the GPU will almost certainly be the limiting factor, as the CPU’s high single-thread and multi-thread scores are unlikely to be saturated by game logic at the frame rates the GPU can produce.

The CPU’s average benchmark score of 62,839 versus the GPU’s average benchmark score of 0 (no GPU benchmarks were provided) makes a direct comparison difficult, but the percentile positions tell the story. The combined percentile of 72 is a weighted average that sits between the CPU’s 93 and the GPU’s 50, reflecting that both components contribute to overall system performance. In CPU-bound workloads like compilation, data compression, and encryption, the processor will perform near the top of its class. In GPU-bound workloads like gaming at high resolutions or GPU rendering, the system will perform near the middle of the pack.

The FPS scaling evidence is absent because no measured FPS data exists for this combination. However, based on the GPU’s 50th percentile, users should expect frame rates that are average compared to other GPU configurations, not exceptional. The CPU will not be the bottleneck in gaming, as its 93rd percentile placement vastly exceeds the GPU’s capability. Conversely, in productivity tasks that use the CPU’s 24 threads, the GPU will sit idle or lightly loaded, so the CPU’s performance will define the experience.

Who Should Build It

This configuration targets users who need a highly capable CPU but can tolerate a mid-tier GPU. Gamers playing at 1080p on medium to high settings will find the GPU sufficient for many titles, though 1440p or 4K gaming will stress the GPU’s 50th percentile performance. The CPU’s 93rd percentile ensures that even the most demanding game physics and AI calculations run smoothly, so frame drops will come from GPU limits, not CPU limits.

Content creators who prioritize CPU-heavy tasks like video encoding, data compression, or software compilation will benefit from the 24 threads and high multi-thread score of 31,817. The GPU’s 16 GB VRAM supports large textures and complex scenes in 3D modeling, but render times will be average, not fast. Developers working on large codebases will appreciate the integer math score of 117,832 and the 16 MB L3 cache for compilation and indexing tasks.

Students and small business users who need a powerful processor for data analysis, spreadsheets, or light programming will find the CPU more than adequate, but they may be paying for GPU capability they do not use. The 28 W TDP supports a portable laptop form factor, making this suitable for on-the-go work. The ECC memory support is a differentiator for users who require data integrity in financial or scientific computing.

FAQ

Q: What is the CPU’s percentile ranking among all processors?

A: The AMD Ryzen AI Embedded P185 sits in the 93rd percentile among all CPUs, with an average benchmark score of 62,839.

Q: How does the CPU compare to its closest rival, the Intel Core Ultra 7 255HX?

A: The P185 scores 62,839, which is 0.2% higher than the Intel Core Ultra 7 255HX’s score of 62,738.

Q: What is the GPU’s memory size and bandwidth?

A: The NVIDIA Quadro RTX 5000 X2 Mobile has 16 GB of GDDR6 memory on a 256-bit bus, providing 448.0 GB/s of bandwidth.

Q: Does this CPU support ECC memory?

A: Yes, the AMD Ryzen AI Embedded P185 supports ECC memory, with a dual-channel DDR5 and LPDDR5X memory bus offering 89.6 GB/s bandwidth.

Q: What is the combined percentile of this CPU+GPU pair?

A: The combined percentile for this build is 72, which is below the CPU’s 93rd percentile but above the GPU’s 50th percentile.

Q: What is the CPU’s TDP and socket type?

A: The CPU has a TDP of 28 W and uses the AMD Socket FP8.

Q: Does the GPU support DirectX 12 Ultimate?

A: Yes, the GPU supports DirectX 12 Ultimate (12_2), along with OpenGL 4.6 and Vulkan 1.4.

Upgrade Path and Platform

The AMD Ryzen AI Embedded P185 uses the AMD Socket FP8, which is a mobile-specific socket. This limits upgradeability, as the CPU is typically soldered to the motherboard in laptop designs. The processor supports DDR5 and LPDDR5X memory over a dual-channel bus with 89.6 GB/s bandwidth, so users can upgrade memory capacity but not the bus width. ECC memory is supported, which is rare in mobile platforms and beneficial for workstation tasks.

The CPU provides PCIe Gen 4 with 16 lanes from the CPU, which is sufficient for one high-end GPU or multiple lower-bandwidth devices. The GPU in this build uses PCIe 3.0 x16, which is backward compatible. The GPU itself has a TDP of 110 W, while the CPU has a TDP of 28 W, for a combined 138 W for the two primary components. The suggested PSU is not listed, but the 110 W GPU TDP and 28 W CPU TDP suggest a modest power supply for a laptop-class system, which is usually battery and adapter constrained rather than PSU constrained.

A sensible next upgrade would be to replace the GPU pair with a newer, higher-percentile GPU, as the CPU’s 93rd percentile offers substantial headroom. The GPU’s production status is end-of-life, so newer options exist. However, the socket FP8 platform limits CPU upgrades, so users should focus on GPU or memory improvements. The PCIe 3.0 x16 interface on the GPU is a potential bottleneck for newer GPUs that support PCIe 4.0, but the CPU’s PCIe Gen 4 lanes would allow a future GPU to run at full speed if the laptop chassis permits it.

Benchmark Performance

The CPU’s benchmark suite shows a multi-thread score of 31,817 and a single-thread score of 3,977. The average benchmark score for the CPU is 62,839, placing it in the 93rd percentile among all CPUs. Its nearest rival, the Intel Core Ultra 7 255HX, averages 62,738, which is 0.2% lower. The Intel Core i7-13790F scores 63,080, 0.4% higher, and the Intel Core Ultra 7 265HX scores 63,173, 0.5% higher. The AMD Ryzen AI 9 PRO 465 scores 62,498, 0.5% lower. These deltas are all under 1%, indicating that the P185 is firmly in the same performance class as these competitors.

The GPU has no benchmark scores listed, but its percentile versus all GPUs is 50, which is the median. The combined percentile for this CPU+GPU pair is 72, reflecting the CPU’s high placement pulling the overall score up from the GPU’s median position. The CPU’s data compression score of 374,429 is a standout, suggesting exceptional performance in compression workloads. The integer math score of 117,832 and floating-point math score of 70,587 are strong for a 28 W mobile chip. The encryption score of 19,612 and extended instructions score of 26,544 round out a capable processing profile.

Build Overview

This is a laptop-class build combining an AMD Ryzen AI Embedded P185 CPU with two NVIDIA Quadro RTX 5000 X2 Mobile GPUs. The CPU is a 12-core, 24-thread processor based on Zen 5 / Zen 5c architecture on a 4 nm process. The GPU is based on the Turing architecture with a TU104 chip on a 12 nm process, featuring 16 GB of GDDR6 memory. The CPU ranks in the 93rd percentile among all CPUs, while the GPU ranks in the 50th percentile among all GPUs. The combined percentile is 72, indicating an above-average system overall, driven primarily by the CPU’s strong performance.

The GPU is end-of-life, with a release date of 2020-06-07, and its predecessor is the Quadro Pascal-M, with the successor being Ampere-MW. The CPU is still active in production, with a release date of 2026-02-28. This pairing represents a modern, power-efficient processor (28 W TDP) with an older, power-hungry GPU (110 W TDP). The 138 W combined TDP is reasonable for a laptop, but the GPU’s Turing architecture and 12 nm process are several generations behind the CPU’s Zen 5 design.

Gaming Performance

No measured FPS data exists for this exact CPU+GPU combination. The FACT PACK provides no measuredFpsUltraByGame entries, so all gaming frame rates discussed here are estimates derived from the benchmark scores rather than direct measurements. The CPU’s single-thread score of 3,977 and multi-thread score of 31,817 indicate that the processor will not limit gaming performance in most titles. The GPU’s 50th percentile placement, however, suggests that frame rates will be average compared to other GPUs in the database.

For 1080p gaming on ultra settings, estimated frame rates would likely range from 60 to 100 FPS in well-optimized titles, based on the GPU’s 9.400 TFLOPS FP32 performance and 448.0 GB/s memory bandwidth. More demanding games with heavy effects or ray tracing may drop below 60 FPS, as the GPU’s 48 RT cores are from the first-generation Turing implementation, which is less efficient than newer architectures. At 1440p, frame rates would likely fall to 40-70 FPS depending on the title, and at 4K, the GPU would struggle to maintain 30 FPS in most modern games.

The GPU’s 16 GB VRAM is generous for gaming, allowing high-resolution textures without running out of memory. However, the 256-bit memory bus and 448.0 GB/s bandwidth are moderate by current standards. The GPU’s 384 tensor cores support DLSS, which can boost frame rates in supported titles, but the Turing generation’s DLSS implementation is older than later versions. Overall, this system is best suited for 1080p gaming at medium to high settings, with the CPU ensuring stable frame pacing and the GPU providing average performance.

GPU Analysis

The NVIDIA Quadro RTX 5000 X2 Mobile is based on the Turing architecture, using a TU104 chip manufactured on a 12 nm process at TSMC. The chip contains 13,600 million transistors on a 545 mm² die, with a transistor density of 25.0M per mm². The GPU has 3,072 shading units, 192 texture mapping units, and 64 raster output units. It features 48 RT cores for ray tracing and 384 tensor cores for AI acceleration. The base clock is 1035 MHz, with a boost clock of 1530 MHz. Memory runs at 1750 MHz, with 14 Gbps effective, across a 256-bit bus for 448.0 GB/s bandwidth.

The GPU’s memory configuration is 16 GB of GDDR6, which is substantial for professional workloads like 3D rendering, video editing, and machine learning inference. The pixel rate is 97.92 GPixel/s, and the texture rate is 293.8 GTexel/s. The FP32 performance is 9.400 TFLOPS, with FP16 performance at 18.80 TFLOPS (2:1). The GPU supports DirectX 12 Ultimate (12_2), OpenGL 4.6, and Vulkan 1.4. It uses a PCIe 3.0 x16 bus interface and has a TDP of 110 W.

The GPU’s 50th percentile placement among all GPUs indicates it is a mid-range performer by current standards. Its benchmark scores are not provided, but the hardware specifications suggest it is capable of 1080p gaming and professional rendering at moderate settings. The 48 RT cores provide ray tracing capability, but the Turing generation is less efficient than Ampere or newer architectures. The 384 tensor cores support DLSS and other AI features, which can improve performance in supported applications. The 16 GB VRAM is a strong point, allowing larger datasets and textures than GPUs with 8 GB or 12 GB. However, the 448.0 GB/s bandwidth and 9.400 TFLOPS FP32 are below the top-tier GPUs of the same era, which explains the median percentile ranking.