SYSTEM ANALYZER

Rate My PC: AMD Ryzen AI Embedded P185 + NVIDIA Quadro RTX 4000 Mobile

Get a comprehensive performance analysis of your gaming rig with detailed benchmarks, bottleneck detection, and upgrade recommendations

85 / 100
HIGH-END

Power Build

Top 15% of systems. Excellent for 1440p Ultra or 4K High gaming.

1440p Ultra4K High

System Balance Analysis

CPU vs GPU performance ratio
GPU Bottleneck
CPU
96%
VS
GPU
74%

Your GPU is limiting system performance. Consider upgrading to a more powerful graphics card to better utilize your CPU.

PROCESSOR

AMD Ryzen AI Embedded P185

62,839 Benchmark Score
Top 4% Market Ranking
View Full Specs →
GRAPHICS CARD

NVIDIA Quadro RTX 4000 Mobile

0 Benchmark Score
Top 26% Market Ranking
View Full Specs →

Market Position

How your build compares to others
Budget
0-30
Mid-Range
30-60
High-End
60-85
Enthusiast
85-100
Your Build

Game Performance Benchmarks

Real-world 4K FPS in popular titles
View All Games →

Performance Insights

Tips to maximize your system

Strong Performance

Excellent for 1440p gaming. Most games will run at high/ultra settings smoothly.

Bottleneck Detected

GPU Bottleneck - Upgrading the weaker component will improve overall performance.

Compatible Games See what you can play Compare CPUs Find upgrades Compare GPUs Find upgrades

Performance Tiers Explained

90-100

Ultimate

4K Ultra gaming, VR ready, ray tracing enabled, professional workloads

4K 60+ FPS VR Ready
70-89

High-End

1440p Ultra or 4K High settings, excellent for modern AAA titles

1440p Ultra 4K High
50-69

Mid-Range

1080p Ultra or 1440p Medium, great value for most gamers

1080p Ultra 1440p Med
30-49

Entry Level

1080p Medium settings, suitable for eSports and older titles

1080p Med eSports
0-29

Legacy

Basic gaming, older titles, consider upgrading for modern games

720p-1080p Low Older Games

This analysis examines the AMD Ryzen AI Embedded P185 processor paired with the NVIDIA Quadro RTX 4000 Mobile graphics solution. The data indicates a high-performance mobile platform with a significant disparity in capability between its two primary components. The CPU is a modern, high-end part, while the GPU is a legacy professional component. All figures presented are drawn directly from the provided specification and benchmark data.

CPU Analysis

The AMD Ryzen AI Embedded P185 is a 12-core, 24-thread processor built on TSMC's 4 nm process node. It belongs to the "Gorgon Point" generation, utilizing a hybrid "Zen 5 / Zen 5c" core architecture. The chip has a base clock of 2.00 GHz and a boost clock of 5.10 GHz, which is a substantial frequency range for a mobile part with a 28 W TDP. This combination of high core count and high boost clock suggests strong performance across both lightly-threaded and heavily-threaded workloads.

The cache hierarchy is substantial: 80 KB of L1 per core, 1 MB of L2 per core, and a 16 MB L3 cache. This design aims to reduce memory latency and improve data throughput for compute-intensive tasks. The processor supports dual-channel DDR5 and LPDDR5X memory, with a peak theoretical memory bandwidth of 89.6 GB/s. It also supports ECC memory, which is a notable feature for professional and reliability-focused applications.

In benchmark testing, the processor demonstrates exceptional capability. The PassMark single-thread score of 3977 indicates excellent per-core performance, which is crucial for responsiveness and lightly-threaded applications. The multi-thread score of 31817 is a strong result, reflecting the processor's ability to handle 24 concurrent threads effectively. The data encryption score of 19612 and extended instructions score of 26544 further highlight the CPU's strength in specialized computational tasks. The floating-point math score of 70587 and integer math score of 117832 are particularly high, suggesting robust performance in scientific and financial modeling.

The processor's overall average benchmark score is 62839, placing it in the 93rd percentile of all CPUs. This places it in the top 7% of all processors tested. Its nearest rivals, based on average score, are the Intel Core Ultra 7 255HX, which scores 62738 and is 0.2% slower, and the AMD Ryzen AI 9 PRO 465, which scores 62498 and is 0.5% slower. Conversely, it trails the Intel Core i7-13790F (score 63080) by 0.4% and the Intel Core Ultra 7 265HX (score 63173) by 0.5%. These deltas are minimal, indicating that the P185 is essentially performance-equivalent to these top-tier desktop and mobile chips, despite its embedded designation and lower TDP.

GPU Analysis

The NVIDIA Quadro RTX 4000 Mobile is a professional-grade graphics solution based on the older Turing architecture. It utilizes the TU104 chip, manufactured on a 12 nm process at TSMC, with 13,600 million transistors on a 545 mm² die. This is a stark contrast to the CPU's 4 nm process, indicating a significant generational gap between the two components. The GPU features 2560 shading units, 160 texture mapping units, and 64 raster operations pipelines.

The memory subsystem consists of 8 GB of GDDR6 memory on a 256-bit bus, providing a bandwidth of 448.0 GB/s. The memory clock is listed as 1750 MHz, with an effective data rate of 14 Gbps. This configuration provides a solid foundation for professional workloads, but the 8 GB VRAM capacity may be a limitation for very large datasets or high-resolution textures in modern applications. The GPU's base clock is 1110 MHz, with a boost clock of 1560 MHz.

For compute, the RTX 4000 Mobile includes 40 RT cores and 320 Tensor cores. This hardware support for ray tracing and AI acceleration is important for rendering and machine learning tasks. The FP32 performance is rated at 7.987 TFLOPS, while FP16 performance is 15.97 TFLOPS with a 2:1 ratio. The texture rate is 249.6 GTexel/s, and the pixel rate is 99.84 GPixel/s. The GPU has a TDP of 110 W, which is a considerable power draw for a mobile component.

The GPU supports DirectX 12 Ultimate (12_2), OpenGL 4.6, and Vulkan 1.4, ensuring compatibility with modern APIs. Its bus interface is PCIe 3.0 x16. Notably, the GPU's production status is "End-of-life", and its release date was in 2019. The benchmark results for this GPU are empty, and its percentile ranking is 50, placing it exactly in the middle of all GPUs. The lack of benchmark data and the 50th percentile ranking paints a picture of a capable, but aging, professional component that has been superseded by newer architectures.

Benchmark Performance

The CPU and GPU present a significant performance asymmetry. The AMD Ryzen AI Embedded P185 is a top-tier performer, as evidenced by its 93rd percentile ranking and average score of 62839. Its nearest rivals are all high-end processors, and the performance gaps are within a fraction of a percent. The CPU's multi-threaded score of 31817 and single-threaded score of 3977 are both strong indicators of its ability to handle demanding professional and creative workflows.

In contrast, the NVIDIA Quadro RTX 4000 Mobile's data profile is much weaker. With no benchmark scores listed and a 50th percentile ranking, it sits at the median of all GPUs. This suggests its performance is expected to be average, and it is likely outclassed by modern high-end mobile GPUs. The combined percentile for this CPU+GPU pair is 72, which is a composite metric that is dragged down by the GPU's mediocre standing. The combined picture is one of a system with a world-class processor throttled by a mid-range, older-generation graphics card. The CPU is performing at a level that would not bottleneck most applications, while the GPU is likely to be the limiting factor in any graphically intensive task.

Balance and Bottleneck

The data strongly suggests a bottleneck in the GPU for most workloads. The CPU's 93rd percentile ranking indicates it is among the fastest processors available, capable of feeding data to the GPU at a very high rate. The GPU's 50th percentile ranking, however, indicates it is only an average performer. In gaming, for instance, the CPU could easily calculate game logic and physics, but the GPU would struggle to render frames at a rate that would utilize the CPU's full potential.

This imbalance is typical of a workstation platform where the CPU is prioritized for compute tasks, and the GPU is used for specific professional applications like CAD or rendering, where its Quadro drivers and certified performance are valued. In tasks like video encoding or 3D rendering that rely on the GPU, the system will be limited by the RTX 4000 Mobile's 7.987 TFLOPS of FP32 performance and 8 GB of VRAM. For CPU-bound tasks like software compilation or data analysis, the system will perform exceptionally well, limited only by the 28 W TDP of the processor. The lack of measured FPS data prevents a quantitative analysis of frame scaling, but the percentile disparity alone is sufficient to conclude that the GPU is the primary performance ceiling.

Upgrade Path and Platform

The platform is built around the AMD Socket FP8. This socket supports DDR5 and LPDDR5X memory, with a dual-channel memory bus providing 89.6 GB/s of bandwidth. The CPU provides 16 PCIe Gen 4 lanes. This is a modern I/O foundation, though the GPU itself operates on a PCIe 3.0 x16 interface, which could be a minor bottleneck for data transfer to and from the GPU.

The CPU's 28 W TDP is a clear indicator of its power efficiency. The GPU's TDP is listed as 110 W. The system has no suggested PSU, which is typical for a laptop where power delivery is integrated into the motherboard. The "slotWidth" for the GPU is listed as "IGP", which is unusual, but in a laptop context, this likely refers to it being an integrated, non-user-replaceable part.

Given the "End-of-life" status of the GPU, a sensible next upgrade would be to replace the entire system to obtain a newer GPU architecture. The CPU, while active, is an embedded part, which may limit its availability on the retail market. The platform's memory support for ECC is a plus for data integrity. The most logical upgrade path is not component-level, but rather a platform-level transition to a newer laptop with a more modern GPU to match the CPU's capability.

FAQ

Q: How does the AMD Ryzen AI Embedded P185 compare to its closest rival, the Intel Core Ultra 7 255HX?

A: The Ryzen AI Embedded P185 has an average benchmark score of 62839, which is 0.2% higher than the Intel Core Ultra 7 255HX's score of 62738.

Q: What is the memory bandwidth of this CPU?

A: The CPU supports dual-channel memory and has a listed memory bandwidth of 89.6 GB/s.

Q: Does the NVIDIA Quadro RTX 4000 Mobile support hardware ray tracing?

A: Yes, it is based on the Turing architecture and includes 40 dedicated RT cores for ray tracing acceleration.

Q: What is the GPU's performance percentile ranking?

A: The NVIDIA Quadro RTX 4000 Mobile is in the 50th percentile of all GPUs, placing it at the median of performance.

Q: How many threads can the CPU process concurrently?

A: The AMD Ryzen AI Embedded P185 has 12 cores and 24 threads, allowing it to process 24 concurrent threads.

Q: What is the power draw of the processor?

A: The CPU has a TDP (Thermal Design Power) of 28 W.

Q: What is the process node used for the CPU and GPU?

A: The CPU is manufactured on a 4 nm process, while the GPU is manufactured on an older 12 nm process.

Who Should Build It

This CPU+GPU pairing is best suited for users who prioritize CPU compute performance in a mobile form factor. The 93rd percentile CPU ranking makes it an excellent choice for developers who need to compile large codebases, data scientists running complex simulations, or engineers using CPU-based analysis tools. The single-thread score of 3977 ensures that even older, less parallelized software will run smoothly.

The GPU, with its 50th percentile ranking, makes this system less ideal for gamers seeking high frame rates at high resolutions. Its professional Quadro lineage and 8 GB of VRAM, however, make it suitable for entry-level 3D modeling and CAD work where driver certification is important. Students in engineering or computer science fields would benefit greatly from the CPU's power. Small business workstations that require reliable, ECC memory-supported computing for financial modeling or database management, but do not have heavy graphical demands, would also find this a balanced platform. The 28 W CPU TDP also suggests this could be part of a power-efficient yet high-performance mobile workstation.

Build Overview

This build represents a laptop-class system (buildClass: "laptop") that combines a top-tier, modern CPU with an older, mid-range professional GPU. The AMD Ryzen AI Embedded P185 (Gorgon Point) is a 12-core processor with a 5.10 GHz boost clock, placing it in the 93rd percentile of all CPUs. The NVIDIA Quadro RTX 4000 Mobile is a Turing-architecture GPU with 8 GB of GDDR6 memory, which sits in the 50th percentile of all GPUs.

The combined percentile for this pairing is 72. This overall tier indicates a system that is firmly above average, but the individual component rankings reveal a significant imbalance. The CPU is a flagship-level part, while the GPU is from a previous generation and performs at a median level. The system is in the upper echelon of overall performance, but its gaming and GPU-accelerated rendering potential is not in the same league as its CPU compute power.

Usage Scenarios

For high-refresh gaming, this system will be limited by the GPU. The RTX 4000 Mobile's 50th percentile ranking indicates it will produce average frame rates, and the 8 GB VRAM may be insufficient for the highest texture settings in modern titles. Users should expect a solid 1080p experience, but not high-refresh or high-resolution dominance.

Streaming is a dual-load scenario. The CPU's multi-thread score of 31817 is more than capable of handling the x264 encoding workload, ensuring a smooth stream. The GPU can handle the game rendering, but its performance will be the limiting factor for stream quality and game settings. This system could stream and play less demanding games well, but it may struggle with newer AAA titles.

Video editing software often uses both CPU and GPU. The CPU's 93rd percentile performance will make timeline scrubbing, effects application, and encoding in software very fast. The GPU will accelerate effects and rendering, but its performance will be average. The 8 GB of VRAM is workable for 1080p and some 4K projects, but larger projects with many layers could hit memory limits.

3D rendering is heavily dependent on the GPU. The RTX 4000 Mobile's FP32 performance of 7.987 TFLOPS and 40 RT cores will render scenes, but at a speed that is average compared to other GPUs. The CPU will be underutilized in this task. This is a scenario where the system's imbalance is most apparent, as the powerful CPU is left waiting on the GPU.

Software development is primarily a CPU-bound task. The 24 threads and high single-thread score of 3977 will handle code compilation, unit testing, and virtual machines with ease. The GPU's performance is irrelevant for most development tasks. This is arguably the best use case for this system, as the CPU is a powerhouse.

For students and office work, this system is overqualified. The CPU will breeze through productivity suites, spreadsheets, and research, with the 93rd percentile ranking ensuring no lag. The GPU is more than sufficient for general desktop rendering. The 28 W TDP also suggests good battery life potential for all-day use on campus or in the office.

Gaming Performance

No measured FPS data exists for this exact CPU+GPU combination. The following discussion is an estimate based on the benchmark scores and percentile rankings of the components, not from direct testing.

Based on the GPU's 50th percentile ranking and its 7.987 TFLOPS of FP32 compute power, gaming performance is expected to be moderate. For a game like Cyberpunk 2077 at 1080p with Ultra settings, the frame rate would likely be in the 30-50 FPS range. At 1440p, it would likely drop below 30 FPS, making it unplayable. For a less demanding title like Fortnite at 1080p Ultra, the system might achieve 60-80 FPS, but 1440p would stress the 8 GB VRAM and likely cause frame drops.

The 8 GB of VRAM is a significant constraint for modern games at high resolutions or with high-resolution texture packs. The 448.0 GB/s of memory bandwidth will not be a bottleneck at these performance levels. The CPU will not be a limiting factor in any gaming scenario, as its single-thread score of 3977 is far above what most games require. The overall gaming experience will be defined by the GPU's age and mid-range standing. Users should target 1080p resolution for a playable experience, and lower graphical settings to achieve higher frame rates.