SYSTEM ANALYZER

Rate My PC: AMD Ryzen AI Embedded P185 + NVIDIA Quadro RTX 3000 Mobile

Get a comprehensive performance analysis of your gaming rig with detailed benchmarks, bottleneck detection, and upgrade recommendations

86 / 100
HIGH-END

Power Build

Top 14% of systems. Excellent for 1440p Ultra or 4K High gaming.

1440p Ultra4K High

System Balance Analysis

CPU vs GPU performance ratio
Well Balanced
CPU
96%
VS
GPU
76%
PROCESSOR

AMD Ryzen AI Embedded P185

62,839 Benchmark Score
Top 4% Market Ranking
View Full Specs →
GRAPHICS CARD

NVIDIA Quadro RTX 3000 Mobile

1,285 Benchmark Score
Top 24% Market Ranking
View Full Specs →

Market Position

How your build compares to others
Budget
0-30
Mid-Range
30-60
High-End
60-85
Enthusiast
85-100
Your Build

Game Performance Benchmarks

Real-world 4K FPS in popular titles
View All Games →

Performance Insights

Tips to maximize your system

Strong Performance

Excellent for 1440p gaming. Most games will run at high/ultra settings smoothly.

Compatible Games See what you can play Compare CPUs Find upgrades Compare GPUs Find upgrades

Performance Tiers Explained

90-100

Ultimate

4K Ultra gaming, VR ready, ray tracing enabled, professional workloads

4K 60+ FPS VR Ready
70-89

High-End

1440p Ultra or 4K High settings, excellent for modern AAA titles

1440p Ultra 4K High
50-69

Mid-Range

1080p Ultra or 1440p Medium, great value for most gamers

1080p Ultra 1440p Med
30-49

Entry Level

1080p Medium settings, suitable for eSports and older titles

1080p Med eSports
0-29

Legacy

Basic gaming, older titles, consider upgrading for modern games

720p-1080p Low Older Games

The AMD Ryzen AI Embedded P185 and NVIDIA Quadro RTX 3000 Mobile pairing is an unusual study in contrasts within a mobile chassis. The CPU is a modern, high-core-count powerhouse built on a 4nm process, while the GPU is an end-of-life Turing-generation part from 2019. The benchmark data indicates a massive imbalance: the processor operates in the top tier of all CPUs, while the graphics card sits near the bottom of the GPU pile. This combination creates a system that excels at heavily threaded, non-graphical computation but is severely constrained in any task requiring modern graphics rendering. The following analysis relies exclusively on the provided benchmark scores and specifications.

CPU Analysis

The AMD Ryzen AI Embedded P185 is a 12-core, 24-thread mobile processor based on the Gorgon Point codename, belonging to the Ryzen AI Embedded generation that utilizes a hybrid Zen 5 / Zen 5c architecture. It is manufactured on TSMC's 4nm process node, with a die size of 233 mm². The base clock is 2.00 GHz, which can boost up to 5.10 GHz under load. The cache hierarchy includes 80 KB of L1 per core, 1 MB of L2 per core, and a total of 16 MB of L3 cache. This is a 28-watt TDP part, indicating a design focused on efficiency despite its high core count.

The benchmark results paint a picture of a processor that is exceptional at parallel workloads. Its Passmark multithread score of 31817 is substantial, placing it in the 93rd percentile among all CPUs. This means it outperforms 93% of all tested processors. In the average benchmark score calculation, it achieves 62839 points. The nearest rivals show its positioning: it is a mere 0.2% ahead of the Intel Core Ultra 7 255HX and 0.5% ahead of the AMD Ryzen AI 9 PRO 465. Conversely, it trails the Intel Core i7-13790F by 0.4% and the Intel Core Ultra 7 265HX by 0.5%. These deltas are minuscule, suggesting a performance cluster where the P185 is competitive but not dominant. The data shows it is essentially neck-and-neck with the latest high-end mobile and desktop parts in aggregate throughput.

Delving into specific workloads, the CPU's integer math score is 117832, while its floating-point math score is 70587. These are strong numbers that reflect well on general computation and scientific calculations. The extended instructions score of 26544 indicates robust SIMD performance. A standout result is the data compression score of 374429, which is exceptionally high and suggests the processor is well-suited for archiving, file management, and database operations. The data encryption score of 19612 supports this, indicating capable cryptographic throughput. However, the single-thread score of 3977 is a more moderate figure, meaning that while the chip has immense multi-core muscle, its per-core performance is less remarkable, though still respectable. This is further evidenced by the physics score of 1772 and the random string sorting score of 40557. The very low find prime numbers score of 129 is an outlier and likely a test-specific result, but it does not detract from the otherwise strong showing. For real workloads, this CPU will excel in video rendering, software compilation, and any task that can utilize all 24 threads, but it will not feel as snappy in lightly-threaded applications as some higher-clocked desktop parts.

Balance and Bottleneck

The data provided reveals a severe bottleneck imbalance in this system. The CPU is in the 93rd percentile for all CPUs, while the GPU is in the 7th percentile for all GPUs. This is a stark disparity. There is no measured FPS data for this combination, so all FPS discussion is estimated from the benchmark scores. The CPU's average benchmark score of 62839 dwarfs the GPU's average score of 1285. In any gaming scenario, the GPU will be the limiting factor. The RTX 3000 Mobile is simply not powerful enough to feed the high frame rates that the Ryzen AI P185 could potentially support.

The combined percentile of the system is 50, which places it in the middle of all CPU+GPU pairings, but this is a misleading statistic. The 50th percentile is an average of a very high CPU score and a very low GPU score. The data indicates that this is a system where the processor will be idle or underutilized while the GPU works at 100% capacity in graphical tasks. Conversely, in non-graphical tasks like CPU-based rendering or data processing, the GPU will be idle, and the CPU will be the star. The FPS scaling in games will be entirely dependent on the GPU's capabilities. The CPU is so powerful that it will not be a limiting factor at any resolution unless the GPU can somehow keep up, which the data suggests it cannot. This is a workstation-oriented pairing where the "bottleneck" is intentional: the designers prioritized CPU compute power and paired it with a basic display adapter for visual output rather than gaming performance.

Usage Scenarios

High-refresh gaming: This is not a viable platform for high-refresh gaming. The Quadro RTX 3000 Mobile's 7th percentile ranking and low benchmark score of 1285 in 3DMark Steel Nomad indicate that it cannot produce high frame rates in modern titles. The CPU's strength is irrelevant here, as the GPU will be the absolute bottleneck. Estimated FPS in any demanding game will be low, making this unsuitable for competitive or high-refresh experiences.

Streaming: The CPU is exceptionally well-suited for software encoding, with its 24 threads and high multithread score of 31817. A streamer could use x264 encoding on the CPU without impacting game performance, but only if the game itself is not GPU-bound. Since the GPU is so weak, the games playable on this system would be older or less demanding, where the CPU could handle both encoding and gameplay. The data suggests that streaming is possible, but the gaming experience will be limited by the GPU.

Video editing: This workload is a mixed bag. The CPU's 12 cores and 24 threads will accelerate timelines and exports significantly, as evidenced by its high multithread and integer scores. However, the GPU's 6 GB of VRAM and Turing architecture will be slow for effects processing, GPU-accelerated rendering, and color grading. The 3DMark score of 1285 suggests that any GPU-accelerated effects will be sluggish. Editors working with simple cuts and transitions will benefit from the CPU, but complex projects will feel bottlenecked by the GPU.

3D rendering: This is a CPU-dominant task, and the P185 is excellent at it. The high floating-point score of 70587 and multithread score of 31817 indicate that CPU-based renderers like Blender Cycles (CPU mode) will perform very well. The Quadro RTX 3000 Mobile, however, will not accelerate this workflow effectively. Its 30 RT cores and 240 tensor cores are present, but the low overall score suggests the render performance will be poor. Data indicates that this system is best used for CPU rendering, not GPU rendering.

Software development: This is a strong use case for the P185. Compilation is a highly parallel task, and the 12-core/24-thread configuration with a 117832 integer score will handle large codebases efficiently. The 16 MB of L3 cache and fast DDR5 memory support will also help with build times. The weak GPU is irrelevant for development tasks. The data clearly shows that this CPU is a workhorse for developers.

Student and office work: The system is overpowered for this scenario. The CPU's capabilities are wasted on document editing and spreadsheet work, and the GPU's poor performance does not matter for these tasks. The 28-watt TDP is efficient, which is a benefit for battery life, but the massive compute power is unused. For a student, this is overkill unless they are running complex simulations or data analysis, in which case the CPU will be a significant asset.

FAQ

Q: How does the AMD Ryzen AI Embedded P185 compare to its closest rivals in terms of average benchmark score?

A: The Ryzen AI P185 has an average score of 62839. It is 0.2% ahead of the Intel Core Ultra 7 255HX and 0.5% ahead of the AMD Ryzen AI 9 PRO 465. It is 0.4% behind the Intel Core i7-13790F and 0.5% behind the Intel Core Ultra 7 265HX.

Q: What is the architectural generation of this CPU and GPU?

A: The CPU uses the Gorgon Point codename and belongs to the Ryzen AI Embedded generation, which utilizes Zen 5 / Zen 5c cores. The GPU is based on the Turing architecture, specifically the TU106 chip, and belongs to the Quadro Turing-M generation.

Q: Is the GPU capable of playing modern games?

A: The data indicates it is not. The GPU's 3DMark Steel Nomad score is 1285, placing it in the 7th percentile of all GPUs. This score is comparable to the NVIDIA GeForce GT 610 and AMD Radeon R9 380, which are not modern gaming parts. Estimated FPS in modern titles would be low.

Q: What is the memory bandwidth available to the CPU and the GPU?

A: The CPU supports dual-channel DDR5 or LPDDR5X memory, providing a bandwidth of 89.6 GB/s. The GPU has 6 GB of GDDR6 memory on a 192-bit bus, offering a bandwidth of 336.0 GB/s.

Q: Does this platform support error-correcting memory?

A: Yes, the CPU specification lists ECC memory support as true. This is a feature typically found in workstation and server platforms, indicating the target market for this processor.

Q: What is the transistor count and process node for the GPU?

A: The NVIDIA Quadro RTX 3000 Mobile is manufactured on TSMC's 12nm process and contains 10,800 million transistors on a 445 mm² die.

Q: What is the combined performance percentile of this CPU+GPU pairing?

A: The combined percentile for this build is 50, which is the median. However, this is an average of a very high CPU score (93rd percentile) and a very low GPU score (7th percentile).

Upgrade Path and Platform

The CPU is socketed in AMD Socket FP8, a mobile-specific socket. This is not a user-upgradeable platform in the traditional sense, as it is a soldered or BGA package typical of laptops. The platform supports DDR5 and LPDDR5X memory in a dual-channel configuration, providing 89.6 GB/s of bandwidth. ECC memory support is listed as true, which is a critical feature for data integrity in workstation scenarios. The CPU provides 16 PCIe Gen 4 lanes natively. The GPU, however, uses a PCIe 3.0 x16 interface via an MXM Module form factor. This means that while the CPU is modern, the expansion bus for the GPU is an older standard. The system also includes an integrated Radeon 890M GPU, which is part of the CPU.

Given the GPU's low performance and end-of-life status, the most sensible next upgrade, if possible in an MXM-based system, would be to replace the Quadro RTX 3000 Mobile with a more modern and powerful GPU. However, the PCIe 3.0 interface might limit the performance of a newer card, and the thermal and power delivery systems would need to support it. The CPU's TDP is 28 watts, while the GPU is 80 watts, for a combined package of 108 watts. This is a low total power draw, meaning the system's power supply has plenty of headroom for a more powerful GPU if the chassis allows it. Since the suggested PSU is null and power connectors for the GPU are listed as "None," the MXM module likely draws power from the board directly, and an upgrade would depend on the laptop manufacturer's design. The CPU itself is a top-tier part, so no CPU upgrade is necessary. The clear bottleneck is the GPU, and upgrading it would transform this system from a CPU-only workstation into a balanced multimedia machine.

GPU Analysis

The NVIDIA Quadro RTX 3000 Mobile is a professional mobile graphics card based on the Turing architecture, using the TU106 chip. It is manufactured on a 12nm process at TSMC, with a die size of 445 mm² and 10,800 million transistors. This is a 6 GB GDDR6 card with a 192-bit memory bus, providing 336.0 GB/s of bandwidth. The base clock is 945 MHz, with a boost clock of 1380 MHz, and the memory runs at 1750 MHz (14 Gbps effective). It has 1920 shading units, 120 TMUs, and 64 ROPs. The card features 30 RT cores and 240 tensor cores, indicating it has hardware support for real-time ray tracing and AI-accelerated workloads. The pixel rate is 88.32 GPixel/s, and the texture rate is 165.6 GTexel/s. The FP32 performance is 5.299 TFLOPS, with FP16 performance at 10.60 TFLOPS. It supports DirectX 12 Ultimate, OpenGL 4.6, and Vulkan 1.4.

The benchmark data is stark: the GPU scores 1285 in 3DMark Steel Nomad DX12, placing it in the 7th percentile of all GPUs. Its nearest rivals include the NVIDIA GeForce GT 610, from which it is 0.3% ahead, and the AMD Radeon R9 380, from which it is 0.6% behind. This places its raw performance in the range of decade-old entry-level graphics cards. The RT and tensor cores are present but their performance is not reflected in the score. The 6 GB VRAM is also a limitation for modern textures. For rendering, this card will not accelerate ray tracing in any meaningful way; the 1285 score in a DirectX 12 test is indicative of very low throughput. The 336 GB/s bandwidth is decent, but the compute power is too low to utilize it effectively. The data shows that this is a display adapter with some compute features, not a rendering powerhouse.

Benchmark Performance

The AMD Ryzen AI Embedded P185 delivers an average benchmark score of 62839, which places it in the 93rd percentile of all CPUs. This is a high-performance result, matching the Intel Core Ultra 7 255HX within 0.2% and the Intel Core i7-13790F within 0.4%. Its single-thread score is 3977, and its multithread score is 31817, demonstrating a strong balance but with a clear emphasis on multi-core work. The CPU's data compression score of 374429 is a standout figure.

The NVIDIA Quadro RTX 3000 Mobile, in contrast, scores 1285 in the 3DMark Steel Nomad DX12 benchmark, placing it in the 7th percentile of all GPUs. It is 1.4% ahead of the NVIDIA GeForce GT 520 and 0.3% ahead of the GT 610, but 0.6% behind the AMD Radeon R9 380. This is a performance level consistent with very old, low-end parts.

The combined picture is one of extreme asymmetry. The system's combined percentile is 50, which is the median, but this is a mathematical artifact. The CPU is a top-tier part, and the GPU is a bottom-tier part. There is no measured FPS data for this combination, so all FPS estimates are extrapolated from these scores. The CPU is capable of supporting high frame rates, but the GPU will cap them at a very low level. This is not a balanced gaming machine; it is a CPU-compute platform with a basic GPU attached.

Build Overview

This build is a laptop-class system that pairs a top-tier 12-core/24-thread AMD Ryzen AI Embedded P185 processor with an end-of-life NVIDIA Quadro RTX 3000 Mobile GPU. The CPU is a modern, efficient 4nm part with a 28-watt TDP, while the GPU is a 12nm Turing part with an 80-watt TDP. The combination creates a system whose overall tier is defined by its CPU. The CPU's 93rd percentile ranking puts it in the high-end category, while the GPU's 7th percentile places it in the entry-level category. The combined 50th percentile accurately reflects that the system is "average" only in the sense that the strengths and weaknesses cancel out.

This is a professional workstation configuration, not a gaming or consumer multimedia laptop. The presence of ECC memory support, a Quadro driver stack, and a high-core-count embedded CPU all point to a device intended for software development, data analysis, and CPU-based rendering. The GPU is likely included for basic display output and compatibility with professional applications that require a certified GPU, but its performance capabilities are minimal. The build class is laptop, meaning all components are integrated into a portable chassis, and the upgrade path is limited by the motherboard and thermal design. Overall, this is a specialized tool for CPU-intensive tasks that need a mobile form factor.

Who Should Build It

This system is targeted at professionals and developers who need extreme CPU compute power in a laptop form factor but have minimal to no requirements for GPU acceleration. The target user is a software developer who compiles large codebases, a data scientist running complex simulations, or an engineer using CPU-based analysis tools. The CPU's 93rd percentile ranking and high multithread score of 31817 make it ideal for these tasks. Students in computer science or engineering fields would also benefit, provided their work is CPU-centric.

Content creators who rely on CPU rendering (such as Blender Cycles CPU mode) will find the processor excellent. The 70587 floating-point score and 117832 integer score are strong indicators of rendering and simulation performance. However, video editors who depend on GPU acceleration will be disappointed; the 6 GB VRAM and low 3DMark score of 1285 will make effects work and GPU rendering very slow. Gamers should avoid this system entirely, as the GPU's 7th percentile ranking means it cannot handle modern titles at acceptable frame rates. Small business workstations that run database operations or financial modeling could also benefit from the high data compression score of 374429, but they must be aware of the GPU's limitations. In summary, this is a machine for number crunching, not for graphics.