SYSTEM ANALYZER

Rate My PC: AMD Ryzen AI Embedded P174i + NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Mobile

Get a comprehensive performance analysis of your gaming rig with detailed benchmarks, bottleneck detection, and upgrade recommendations

68 / 100
MID-RANGE

Solid Performer

Top 32% of systems. Great for 1080p Ultra or 1440p Medium gaming.

1080p Ultra1440p Med

System Balance Analysis

CPU vs GPU performance ratio
CPU Bottleneck
CPU
41%
VS
GPU
95%

Your CPU is limiting system performance. Consider upgrading to a faster processor to better utilize your GPU.

PROCESSOR

AMD Ryzen AI Embedded P174i

0 Benchmark Score
Top 59% Market Ranking
View Full Specs →
GRAPHICS CARD

NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Mobile

38,135 Benchmark Score
Top 5% Market Ranking
View Full Specs →

Market Position

How your build compares to others
Budget
0-30
Mid-Range
30-60
High-End
60-85
Enthusiast
85-100
Your Build

Game Performance Benchmarks

Real-world 4K FPS in popular titles
View All Games →

Performance Insights

Tips to maximize your system

Solid Mid-Range

Great for 1080p gaming. Consider upgrading GPU for better 1440p performance.

Bottleneck Detected

CPU Bottleneck - Upgrading the weaker component will improve overall performance.

Compatible Games See what you can play Compare CPUs Find upgrades Compare GPUs Find upgrades

Performance Tiers Explained

90-100

Ultimate

4K Ultra gaming, VR ready, ray tracing enabled, professional workloads

4K 60+ FPS VR Ready
70-89

High-End

1440p Ultra or 4K High settings, excellent for modern AAA titles

1440p Ultra 4K High
50-69

Mid-Range

1080p Ultra or 1440p Medium, great value for most gamers

1080p Ultra 1440p Med
30-49

Entry Level

1080p Medium settings, suitable for eSports and older titles

1080p Med eSports
0-29

Legacy

Basic gaming, older titles, consider upgrading for modern games

720p-1080p Low Older Games

This system pairing combines AMD’s Ryzen AI Embedded P174i processor with NVIDIA’s GeForce RTX 4080 Mobile GPU in a laptop form factor. The CPU is a 10-core, 20-thread part based on the Zen 5 / Zen 5c hybrid architecture, codenamed Gorgon Point, built on TSMC’s 4 nm process. Its base clock is 2.00 GHz with a boost clock of 5.00 GHz, and it carries a 28 W TDP. The GPU is an Ada Lovelace generation part with 7,424 shading units, 58 RT cores, and 232 tensor cores, running at a 1290 MHz base and 1665 MHz boost. The pair sits at the 66th percentile overall, which places it above the median but not in the top tier of laptop systems. The CPU alone holds the 50th percentile among all CPUs, while the GPU ranks at the 81st percentile among all GPUs.

CPU Analysis

The AMD Ryzen AI Embedded P174i is a 10-core processor with 20 threads, using a hybrid arrangement of Zen 5 and Zen 5c cores. This design combines full-performance cores with higher-density efficiency cores, which is a common approach for balancing throughput and power consumption in mobile parts. The base clock of 2.00 GHz is conservative, but the 5.00 GHz boost clock provides substantial headroom for bursty workloads. The 4 nm TSMC process node helps keep power draw manageable within the 28 W TDP envelope, making this a processor suited for thin-and-light laptops that still need significant multi-threaded capability.

The cache hierarchy is notable for a mobile chip: 80 KB of L1 per core, 1 MB of L2 per core, and 16 MB of shared L3. That L3 capacity is modest by desktop standards, but it is adequate for the dual-channel DDR5 memory interface, which provides 89.6 GB/s of bandwidth. ECC memory support is included, which is unusual for a consumer-focused mobile part and points toward embedded or workstation use cases. The integrated Radeon 880M graphics provide a fallback display output, though the discrete RTX 4080 Mobile will handle heavy graphics work.

The CPU’s 50th percentile rank against all CPUs indicates it is an average performer in the broader database. However, its 10-core/20-thread configuration and 5.00 GHz boost suggest it will outperform that percentile in short, single-threaded tasks that rely on clock speed. In sustained multi-core workloads, the 28 W TDP will limit how long it can hold high boost clocks, but the hybrid core design should still deliver respectable all-core throughput for a laptop part. The 233 mm² die size reflects the integration of both core types and the Radeon 880M iGPU on the same package.

For real workloads, the benchmark percentile suggests the CPU is not a bottleneck for everyday productivity, but it will not dominate in heavily threaded rendering or compilation tasks. The 5.00 GHz boost clock is a strong asset for single-threaded responsiveness, such as opening applications or handling spreadsheet macros. The lack of an unlocked multiplier means overclocking is not an option, so users must rely on the manufacturer’s power and thermal tuning.

Benchmark Performance

The CPU has no individual benchmark scores in the data pack, so its performance is characterized solely by its 50th percentile rank. This means it sits exactly at the midpoint of all CPUs in the database, indicating balanced but unremarkable compute capability. The GPU, by contrast, has a rich set of benchmark scores. In Geekbench OpenCL, it scores 159,575, and in Geekbench Vulkan, it scores 145,807. These are compute-oriented tests that stress raw throughput across the shading units, and the scores suggest strong parallel compute performance.

In PassMark tests, the GPU scores 24,926 in G3D, which is the primary gaming-oriented metric. Its PassMark G2D score of 929 is lower, reflecting that 2D desktop rendering is not a priority for this part. DirectX 9 and DirectX 11 scores are 286 and 244, respectively, while DirectX 10 is 157 and DirectX 12 is 96. The DirectX 12 score being lower than older API versions is a pattern seen in some GPUs where driver optimization for newer APIs lags behind mature ones. The GPU compute score of 11,191 indicates solid general-purpose compute ability, which aligns with the Geekbench OpenCL result.

The GPU’s average benchmark score is 38,135, placing it at the 81st percentile among all GPUs. Its nearest rivals are the NVIDIA GeForce MX570 at -0.4% delta, the RTX 5080 Mobile at -0.6% delta, the RTX 4070 at +1.3% delta, and the Tesla P4 at +1.3% delta. This clustering shows that the RTX 4080 Mobile is effectively tied with those parts in average score, with less than 2% separating the group. The combined picture is a CPU that is average and a GPU that is well above average, resulting in a system that will be bottlenecked by the processor in many tasks.

Usage Scenarios

For high-refresh gaming, the RTX 4080 Mobile’s 81st percentile ranking and 24,926 PassMark G3D score indicate it can drive high frame rates, but the CPU’s 50th percentile may limit frame pacing in CPU-bound titles. The GPU’s strong compute scores suggest it will handle GPU-bound scenes well, but users should expect some stutter in games that rely heavily on single-threaded CPU performance.

Streaming and content creation benefit from the GPU’s 24.72 TFLOPS FP32 compute and 232 tensor cores, which accelerate encoding and AI-assisted workflows. The 12 GB GDDR6 memory and 432.0 GB/s bandwidth provide ample space for streaming buffers and video processing. The CPU’s 20 threads help with multitasking, but its average percentile means it will not excel at simultaneous game and stream encoding without dropping settings.

Video editing in applications like Premiere Pro or DaVinci Resolve will lean heavily on the GPU’s compute power. The 159,575 Geekbench OpenCL score indicates strong OpenCL acceleration, which many editors use for effects and rendering. The CPU’s 10 cores and 20 threads will handle timeline scrubbing and proxy generation adequately, though the 28 W TDP may cause thermal throttling in prolonged export sessions.

3D rendering in Blender or similar tools will favor the GPU’s 58 RT cores and 24.72 TFLOPS FP32 throughput. The PassMark GPU compute score of 11,191 suggests solid ray tracing performance for a mobile part. The CPU’s role in scene preparation and physics calculations will be a limiting factor, given its 50th percentile rank, but the GPU should dominate actual render times.

Software development workloads, including compilation and code analysis, are primarily CPU-bound. The 10-core, 20-thread configuration with a 5.00 GHz boost clock will compile code reasonably quickly, but the 50th percentile rank means it is not a top-tier developer laptop. The 16 MB L3 cache may cause some performance dips in large codebases that exceed cache capacity.

Student and office work is where this pairing is overkill. The CPU’s average performance handles word processing and web browsing easily, while the GPU sits idle for most tasks. The 28 W CPU TDP and 110 W GPU TDP mean the system will drain battery quickly, but for users who need occasional gaming or rendering, the performance is there when required.

FAQ

Q: What is the CPU’s core and thread count?

A: The AMD Ryzen AI Embedded P174i has 10 cores and 20 threads, using a hybrid Zen 5 / Zen 5c architecture.

Q: How does the GPU compare to its nearest rivals in average score?

A: The RTX 4080 Mobile averages 38,135, which is -0.4% versus the GeForce MX570, -0.6% versus the RTX 5080 Mobile, and +1.3% versus both the RTX 4070 and Tesla P4.

Q: What memory types does the CPU support?

A: The CPU supports DDR5 and LPDDR5X memory in a dual-channel configuration, with ECC support enabled, providing 89.6 GB/s of bandwidth.

Q: What is the GPU’s memory configuration?

A: The GPU has 12 GB of GDDR6 memory on a 192-bit bus, yielding 432.0 GB/s of bandwidth and an effective memory clock of 18 Gbps.

Q: What is the GPU’s percentile ranking among all GPUs?

A: The GPU sits at the 81st percentile, while the CPU sits at the 50th percentile, and the combined system is at the 66th percentile.

Q: Does the GPU support modern graphics APIs?

A: Yes, it supports DirectX 12 Ultimate (12_2), OpenGL 4.6, and Vulkan 1.4.

Q: What is the CPU’s boost clock and TDP?

A: The CPU boosts to 5.00 GHz from a 2.00 GHz base, with a 28 W TDP.

Gaming Performance

No measured FPS rows exist for this exact CPU+GPU combination, so all frame rate discussion is estimated from the benchmark scores. The GPU’s 24,926 PassMark G3D score and 81st percentile rank indicate it is capable of high frame rates at 1080p and 1440p in most titles. The 12 GB VRAM is sufficient for modern textures at high settings, but 4K gaming may require reduced settings due to the 192-bit memory bus limiting bandwidth.

At 1080p, the GPU should deliver 100+ FPS in esports titles like CS:GO or Valorant, given its raw rasterization throughput. For AAA games, expect 60-80 FPS at high settings, with the CPU’s 50th percentile potentially capping frame rates in CPU-bound scenes. At 1440p, the GPU’s 432.0 GB/s bandwidth becomes more of a factor, but the 24.72 TFLOPS FP32 throughput should still produce 60+ FPS in most titles.

The CPU’s 5.00 GHz boost clock will help in games that favor single-thread performance, but its 16 MB L3 cache is small by gaming standards. The lack of measured FPS data means these figures are estimates, but the GPU’s benchmark scores are strong enough to suggest a capable gaming laptop, particularly at 1080p and 1440p resolutions. Higher refresh rates above 144 Hz will be achievable in less demanding titles, while the most graphically intensive games will hover around 60 FPS.

Who Should Build It

This pairing targets gamers who prioritize GPU performance over CPU throughput. The RTX 4080 Mobile’s 81st percentile rank makes it suitable for 1080p and 1440p high-refresh gaming, while the CPU’s 50th percentile is adequate for mainstream gaming workloads. Content creators who rely on GPU acceleration for rendering and video editing will benefit from the 24.72 TFLOPS compute and 12 GB VRAM, though they should accept CPU limitations in multi-threaded tasks.

Software developers building large projects may find the CPU’s 10 cores and 20 threads useful for parallel builds, but the 50th percentile rank means it is not a top-tier development machine. Students and office workers will find this overkill for their needs, but the GPU provides headroom for occasional gaming or creative projects. Small business workstations that need GPU compute for tasks like CAD or data visualization will appreciate the RTX 4080 Mobile’s OpenCL and Vulkan scores, which indicate strong compute acceleration.

The laptop class means this is a portable solution, but the 28 W CPU and 110 W GPU TDPs imply significant cooling requirements and limited battery life under load. Users who need sustained multi-core performance for rendering or compilation should look elsewhere, as the CPU’s 28 W envelope will throttle under extended loads. For balanced gaming and light creative work, this pairing is well-suited, but it is not a workstation replacement.

GPU Analysis

The NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Mobile is built on the Ada Lovelace architecture using the AD104 chip, fabricated on TSMC’s 5 nm process. The die contains 35,800 million transistors across a 294 mm² area, giving a density of 121.8M transistors per mm². The GPU has 7,424 shading units, 232 texture mapping units, and 80 raster output units, with 58 RT cores and 232 tensor cores. This configuration delivers 24.72 TFLOPS of FP32 throughput and an equal 24.72 TFLOPS of FP16, indicating that the GPU does not halve FP16 performance as some older architectures do.

The memory subsystem uses 12 GB of GDDR6 on a 192-bit bus, running at an effective 18 Gbps, which yields 432.0 GB/s of bandwidth. This is a moderate bandwidth figure for a high-end mobile GPU, and it may limit performance in memory-intensive scenarios like 4K textures or large compute workloads. The base clock of 1290 MHz and boost clock of 1665 MHz are relatively low, but the high core count compensates in parallel tasks. The pixel rate is 133.2 GPixel/s, and the texture rate is 386.3 GTexel/s, both strong figures for a laptop part.

The GPU’s 81st percentile rank and 38,135 average benchmark score place it in the upper tier of mobile GPUs, just behind the RTX 5080 Mobile by a slim 0.6% margin. Its PassMark G3D score of 24,926 indicates robust rasterization, while the 11,191 GPU compute score shows solid non-graphics performance. The 58 RT cores will accelerate ray tracing workloads, and the 232 tensor cores provide AI acceleration for DLSS and similar features. The 110 W TDP is high for a laptop GPU, requiring a substantial cooling solution and limiting thin-and-light designs.

Build Overview

This is a laptop-class system combining an AMD Ryzen AI Embedded P174i CPU with an NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Mobile GPU. The CPU’s 50th percentile rank places it at the median of all processors, while the GPU’s 81st percentile rank places it well above average. The combined system sits at the 66th percentile, indicating that the GPU’s strong performance carries the overall score. The CPU’s 10 cores and 20 threads provide decent multi-threading, but its 28 W TDP limits sustained performance in demanding workloads.

The pairing is unbalanced in favor of the GPU, which is typical for gaming laptops where the discrete GPU dominates. The CPU’s 5.00 GHz boost clock helps with single-threaded tasks, but its 16 MB L3 cache and dual-channel memory bandwidth may hold back the GPU in some scenarios. The system’s overall tier is mid-to-upper range, given the 66th percentile, but it does not reach the top tier where both CPU and GPU are above the 90th percentile.

For users who want a laptop that can handle modern games at high settings and accelerate creative workloads, this pairing is competent. The GPU’s 12 GB VRAM and 432.0 GB/s bandwidth are sufficient for most current titles, and the 24.72 TFLOPS compute power will speed up rendering tasks. The CPU’s average performance is the weak link, but it does not prevent the system from being a strong gaming and content creation machine.

Balance and Bottleneck

The data shows a clear imbalance: the GPU outperforms the CPU by a significant margin in percentile terms. The CPU’s 50th percentile rank versus the GPU’s 81st percentile means the processor is more likely to be the limiting factor in most workloads. In gaming, the CPU’s single-thread performance and L3 cache size will determine frame rates in CPU-bound scenes, while the GPU handles the graphical load. The 5.00 GHz boost clock mitigates this somewhat, but the 16 MB L3 cache is small for modern titles.

In compute-heavy workloads like rendering or video editing, the GPU’s 24.72 TFLOPS and 58 RT cores will dominate, making the CPU’s role secondary. The GPU’s 12 GB VRAM may also become a bottleneck in very large scenes, but the 432.0 GB/s bandwidth is adequate for most tasks. The CPU’s 28 W TDP will cause it to throttle under sustained load, reducing its effective performance in long renders or compilations.

The FPS scaling in games will follow the GPU’s strong benchmark scores, but the CPU may cap frame rates in titles that are not well-threaded. The 20 threads help with multi-threaded games, but the 50th percentile rank indicates it is not a top-tier gaming CPU. Overall, the GPU is the driving force, and the CPU should be seen as a supporting component that handles background tasks and light workloads.

Upgrade Path and Platform

The CPU uses AMD Socket FP8, which is a mobile-specific socket, meaning upgrades are limited to the laptop’s motherboard and cannot be swapped in a conventional sense. The CPU supports DDR5 and LPDDR5X memory in a dual-channel configuration, with ECC support, providing 89.6 GB/s of bandwidth. The PCIe interface is Gen 4 with 16 lanes from the CPU, which is sufficient for the GPU’s PCIe 4.0 x16 bus interface.

The GPU has no suggested PSU requirement, and its 110 W TDP is the primary power draw. The system’s total power consumption will depend on the laptop’s power delivery, but the 28 W CPU and 110 W GPU TDPs suggest a combined load of around 138 W under full stress. Upgrading the GPU is not possible in a laptop, so the only realistic upgrade path is replacing the entire system or adding external storage via PCIe.

For memory, the dual-channel DDR5 support means users can upgrade RAM up to the motherboard’s maximum capacity, though the 89.6 GB/s bandwidth is fixed by the memory controller. The CPU’s integrated Radeon 880M graphics provide a fallback if the discrete GPU fails, but it is not suitable for gaming. A sensible next upgrade would be a newer system with a higher-performing CPU, as the GPU’s 81st percentile rank is already strong, while the CPU’s 50th percentile is the limiting factor.