SYSTEM ANALYZER

Rate My PC: AMD Ryzen AI Embedded P164 + NVIDIA RTX 3000 Mobile Ada Generation

Get a comprehensive performance analysis of your gaming rig with detailed benchmarks, bottleneck detection, and upgrade recommendations

Build Configuration

Select your components

PROCESSOR (CPU)

▼

GRAPHICS CARD (GPU)

▼

84 Score

Top 16% Ranking

84 / 100

HIGH-END

Power Build

Top 16% of systems. Excellent for 1440p Ultra or 4K High gaming.

1440p Ultra4K High

System Balance Analysis

CPU vs GPU performance ratio

GPU Bottleneck

CPU

95%

GPU

74%

Your GPU is limiting system performance. Consider upgrading to a more powerful graphics card to better utilize your CPU.

PROCESSOR

AMD Ryzen AI Embedded P164

52,901 Benchmark Score

Top 5% Market Ranking

View Full Specs →

GRAPHICS CARD

NVIDIA RTX 3000 Mobile Ada Generation

0 Benchmark Score

Top 26% Market Ranking

View Full Specs →

Market Position

How your build compares to others

Budget

0-30

Mid-Range

30-60

High-End

60-85

Enthusiast

85-100

Your Build

Game Performance Benchmarks

Real-world 4K FPS in popular titles

View All Games →

Performance Insights

Tips to maximize your system

Strong Performance

Excellent for 1440p gaming. Most games will run at high/ultra settings smoothly.

Bottleneck Detected

GPU Bottleneck - Upgrading the weaker component will improve overall performance.

Compatible Games See what you can play Compare CPUs Find upgrades Compare GPUs Find upgrades

Performance Tiers Explained

90-100

Ultimate

4K Ultra gaming, VR ready, ray tracing enabled, professional workloads

4K 60+ FPS VR Ready

70-89

High-End

1440p Ultra or 4K High settings, excellent for modern AAA titles

1440p Ultra 4K High

50-69

Mid-Range

1080p Ultra or 1440p Medium, great value for most gamers

1080p Ultra 1440p Med

30-49

Entry Level

1080p Medium settings, suitable for eSports and older titles

1080p Med eSports

0-29

Legacy

Basic gaming, older titles, consider upgrading for modern games

720p-1080p Low Older Games

The AMD Ryzen AI Embedded P164 and NVIDIA RTX 3000 Mobile Ada Generation form a mobile computing package aimed at balancing sustained throughput with a capable graphics component. This analysis is based entirely on the provided benchmark data, which contains no measured FPS rows for this exact combination. Consequently, all gaming performance discussion is framed as an estimate derived from the CPU and GPU scores, not from empirical frame rate testing.

CPU Analysis

The AMD Ryzen AI Embedded P164 is an 8-core, 16-thread processor based on the Gorgon Point architecture, belonging to the Ryzen AI Embedded generation built on a mix of Zen 5 and Zen 5c cores. It operates within a 28-watt TDP envelope, a figure that signals a focus on power efficiency for sustained mobile workloads. The silicon is manufactured on a 4 nm process at TSMC, with a die size of 233 mm². The core configuration is complemented by a cache hierarchy that includes 80 KB of L1 per core, 1 MB of L2 per core, and a shared 8 MB of L3 cache. The base clock is 2.00 GHz, which can scale up to a 5.00 GHz boost clock for demanding single-threaded tasks.

Benchmark results place this processor in the 91st percentile among all CPUs, indicating strong overall performance. The average benchmark score is 52901, positioning it in a tight cluster with several desktop-class rivals. The data shows it is effectively neck-and-neck with the AMD Ryzen 5 9500F, trailing by a negligible 0.1%, and it sits just 0.1% ahead of the Intel Xeon 634. The margin to the AMD EPYC 7313P is 0.6%, and it is 0.7% behind the AMD Ryzen 9 7900X. These deltas are minimal, meaning the P164 holds its own against established desktop processors despite its embedded mobile designation.

Looking at specific workload scores, the single-thread performance is recorded at 4029 points, a solid figure that drives responsiveness in everyday applications and lightly-threaded tasks. The multi-thread score of 25889 reflects the 16-thread capability and is a strong indicator for parallel workloads. The floating-point math score of 55799 and integer math score of 87940 show a balanced ALU/FPU design, which is beneficial for mixed-use scenarios. The extended instructions score of 24193 suggests the Zen 5 cores handle modern SIMD workloads competently. Data encryption scores are 16055, and data compression reaches 327891, indicating the processor is particularly adept at compression tasks. The physics score of 1210 is a lower relative figure, suggesting that while the CPU is fast, its 28-watt power budget does impose limits on sustained heavy physics calculations compared to higher-power desktop parts. The find prime numbers score is 71, a specialized metric that is less relevant to general productivity.

Gaming Performance

The FACT PACK contains no measured FPS data for this CPU and GPU combination, so all frame rate expectations are estimates based on the component benchmark scores. The CPU’s 91st percentile ranking and strong single-thread score of 4029 suggest it can feed the GPU adequately in most gaming scenarios. The GPU, however, sits at the 50th percentile among all GPUs, which is the primary limiter for high-end gaming.

For esports titles and less demanding games, the combination of a strong single-thread CPU and the Ada Lovelace GPU should deliver high frame rates at 1080p, likely exceeding 100 FPS in many optimized titles. The CPU is not expected to bottleneck these lighter workloads, allowing the GPU to operate near its full potential. At 1440p, the GPU becomes more stressed, and frame rates will scale down, but the experience should remain fluid for competitive gaming.

For AAA titles at 1080p with ultra settings, the RTX 3000 Mobile Ada Generation is expected to produce playable frame rates, potentially in the 60-80 FPS range depending on the title’s optimization. At 1440p ultra, these games will likely see frame rates dip into the 40-60 FPS territory, requiring some settings adjustments for a consistent 60 FPS experience. The 8 GB VRAM and 256.0 GB/s bandwidth are adequate for 1080p and 1440p rendering, but they may be stressed by 4K textures in the most demanding titles. Given the GPU’s 50th percentile standing, it is a mid-range performer, and the data suggests that high-refresh 1440p gaming or 4K gaming is beyond its comfortable reach.

Upgrade Path and Platform

The platform is built around the AMD Socket FP8, which is a mobile-specific socket, meaning upgradeability is limited to what the laptop chassis allows. The CPU supports dual-channel DDR5 and LPDDR5X memory, with a total memory bandwidth of 89.6 GB/s and ECC memory support. This memory configuration is well-suited for workstation-class tasks where data integrity is critical. The CPU provides 16 PCIe Gen 4 lanes, which is sufficient for the discrete GPU and a fast NVMe SSD, though expansion options are fixed by the laptop’s design.

The system’s power delivery is a key consideration. The CPU has a 28-watt TDP, and the GPU has a 115-watt TDP, totaling 143 watts for the core components alone. This is a significant thermal and power load for a laptop, and the data suggests that the system will require a robust cooling solution and a substantial power adapter. The GPU’s power connector is listed as "None," which is typical for mobile IGP-style modules that draw power through the motherboard. A sensible next upgrade for this platform would be increasing memory capacity or speed, provided the laptop BIOS supports it. Storage is the other viable upgrade path, as adding a second PCIe Gen 4 NVMe drive could enhance load times and file transfer speeds. The CPU and GPU are soldered, so their upgradeability is effectively zero.

Who Should Build It

This configuration targets users who need a balance of CPU horsepower and mid-range GPU capability in a mobile form factor. The CPU’s 91st percentile ranking and strong multi-thread score of 25889 make it suitable for content creators who work with video editing, 3D rendering, and software compilation. The 8-core/16-thread design handles these parallel tasks efficiently, and the 28-watt TDP suggests it can sustain these workloads without excessive thermal throttling.

For developers, the processor’s strong integer math score of 87940 and data compression score of 327891 indicate solid performance for code compilation and build pipelines. The ECC memory support is a distinct advantage for developers working on critical systems or data integrity-sensitive applications.

Students and small business workstations would also benefit from this setup. The CPU’s single-thread score of 4029 ensures snappy responsiveness for office productivity, web browsing, and document editing. The GPU, while not a gaming powerhouse, is capable of accelerating video encoding, graphical design software, and light 3D modeling. The overall 71st combined percentile ranking indicates a well-rounded system that is above average for general computing tasks, making it a strong choice for users who need a single machine for both professional work and moderate gaming. The data does not support recommending this for hardcore gamers seeking max settings at 1440p or above, as the GPU’s 50th percentile ranking is the limiting factor.

Balance and Bottleneck

The system presents a distinct imbalance between the CPU and GPU. The CPU is a high-performing part at the 91st percentile, while the GPU is a mid-range part at the 50th percentile. This indicates that in gaming workloads, the GPU will be the primary bottleneck, limiting frame rates in graphically intensive titles. The CPU has ample headroom to feed the GPU, and it is unlikely to be the limiting factor in most gaming scenarios.

Conversely, in CPU-bound workloads such as physics simulation, data compression, and software compilation, the GPU’s role diminishes, and the CPU’s strong scores come to the forefront. The CPU’s physics score of 1210, while lower than its other metrics, still places it well above the GPU’s capabilities in this domain. For tasks like video encoding, the balance is more even; the CPU can handle the encoding, while the GPU’s tensor cores can accelerate AI-driven effects or transcoding, if the software supports it.

The FPS scaling evidence is absent, as no measured data exists. However, the percentile gap strongly suggests that a user upgrading from a lower-end CPU would see minimal FPS gains in GPU-bound titles because the GPU is the constraint. Conversely, a user upgrading the GPU in this system would see substantial FPS improvements in gaming, as the CPU is capable of supporting a faster graphics card. The data indicates that this is a CPU-heavy build, ideal for productivity, but it leaves gaming performance on the table relative to the CPU’s potential.

Usage Scenarios

High-Refresh Gaming: At 1080p, the GPU is expected to handle esports and less demanding titles well, with the CPU’s 4029 single-thread score ensuring minimal bottlenecking. However, the GPU’s 50th percentile status limits the ability to hit high refresh rates in newer AAA titles, where 100+ FPS may require reduced settings.

Streaming: The CPU’s multi-thread score of 25889 provides enough headroom for software encoding at 1080p while gaming. The GPU’s Ada Lovelace architecture includes dedicated NVENC hardware, which can offload encoding tasks and preserve CPU performance for the game itself. This is a viable streaming setup for 1080p60 broadcasts.

Video Editing: The 8-core/16-thread CPU handles timeline scrubbing and export encoding efficiently, with the floating-point score of 55799 supporting complex effects. The GPU accelerates rendering previews and effects in compatible software, and the 8 GB VRAM is sufficient for 1080p and 1440p editing timelines.

3D Rendering: The CPU’s multi-thread performance is strong for CPU-based rendering, and the GPU’s 4608 shading units provide a solid foundation for GPU-accelerated renderers. The 15.62 TFLOPS of FP32 performance is respectable for a mobile part, and the 36 RT cores can accelerate ray-traced previews, though final renders on complex scenes will be slow due to the GPU’s mid-range positioning.

Software Development: The integer math score of 87940 and data compression score of 327891 indicate strong performance for code compilation, linking, and packaging. The ECC memory support is a significant plus for long-running build servers or development environments where data corruption is a concern.

Student and Office Work: The CPU’s single-thread performance ensures quick application launches and smooth multitasking for office suites, web research, and note-taking. The integrated Radeon 880M graphics provide a fallback for display output, and the dedicated GPU handles any light 3D or design coursework. This system is overqualified for basic office tasks, but the headroom ensures longevity.

GPU Analysis

The NVIDIA RTX 3000 Mobile Ada Generation is based on the AD106 chip, manufactured on a 5 nm process at TSMC with 22,900 million transistors on a 188 mm² die. This is a mid-range mobile GPU featuring 4608 shading units, 144 texture mapping units, and 48 raster output units. The memory subsystem consists of 8 GB of GDDR6 on a 128-bit bus, delivering a bandwidth of 256.0 GB/s. The clock speeds are set to a base of 1395 MHz and a boost of 1695 MHz, with memory running at 2000 MHz (16 Gbps effective). The GPU supports DirectX 12 Ultimate, OpenGL 4.6, and Vulkan 1.4, ensuring compatibility with the latest gaming APIs.

The GPU’s percentile ranking is 50th among all GPUs, which places it squarely in the mid-range tier. The FP32 compute throughput is 15.62 TFLOPS, a figure that is adequate for general rendering and compute tasks but not exceptional. The pixel rate is 81.36 GPixel/s, and the texture rate is 244.1 GTexel/s, which are moderate figures that support 1080p and 1440p gaming. The 36 RT cores and 144 tensor cores provide hardware support for ray tracing and DLSS, though the GPU’s overall compute power limits the effectiveness of ray tracing at high settings.

The 8 GB VRAM capacity is becoming a constraint in modern titles, especially at 1440p with high-resolution texture packs. The 256.0 GB/s bandwidth is sufficient for the GPU’s compute capabilities, but it is not excessive. The GPU has a TDP of 115 watts, which is typical for a mid-range mobile part, and it is designed for an IGP slot width with no external power connectors, meaning it draws power through the motherboard. The bus interface is PCIe 4.0 x16, which is fully compatible with the CPU’s PCIe Gen 4 lanes. The display outputs are listed as portable device dependent, so connectivity varies by laptop model. This GPU is a capable partner for the P164 CPU, but the data clearly shows it is the weaker link in the system for graphics-intensive tasks.

FAQ

Q: What is the combined performance percentile of this CPU and GPU pair?

A: The combined percentile for this system is 71, indicating it performs better than 71% of all tested configurations in the database.

Q: How does the CPU compare to the AMD Ryzen 9 7900X in average benchmark score?

A: The Ryzen AI Embedded P164 has an average benchmark score of 52901, which is 0.7% lower than the AMD Ryzen 9 7900X’s score of 53288.

Q: What is the GPU’s memory bandwidth and capacity?

A: The GPU features 8 GB of GDDR6 memory on a 128-bit bus, providing a total bandwidth of 256.0 GB/s.

Q: Is the CPU’s single-thread performance strong enough for gaming?

A: The CPU’s single-thread score is 4029, which is a strong result and should not bottleneck most gaming workloads, especially at 1080p.

Q: What is the TDP of the CPU and GPU respectively?

A: The CPU has a TDP of 28 watts, while the GPU has a TDP of 115 watts.

Q: Does the CPU support ECC memory?

A: Yes, the CPU supports ECC memory, which is beneficial for workstation and data-integrity-sensitive applications.

Q: What is the process node for the CPU and GPU?

A: The CPU is manufactured on a 4 nm process at TSMC, while the GPU is manufactured on a 5 nm process at TSMC.

Benchmark Performance

The AMD Ryzen AI Embedded P164 achieves an average benchmark score of 52901, placing it in the 91st percentile of all CPUs. The nearest rival is the AMD Ryzen 5 9500F with an average score of 52873, a delta of just 0.1%. The Intel Xeon 634 scores 52974, which is 0.1% higher than the P164. The AMD EPYC 7313P scores 53206, a 0.6% lead, and the AMD Ryzen 9 7900X scores 53288, a 0.7% lead. These scores indicate that the P164 is a high-performing processor that competes directly with desktop-class parts, despite its embedded mobile designation.

The NVIDIA RTX 3000 Mobile Ada Generation has a percentile ranking of 50th among all GPUs, with an average benchmark score of 0 in this dataset. The GPU’s individual benchmark scores are not provided, so its performance profile is defined by its specifications and percentile position.

The combined picture is a system with a top-tier CPU and a mid-tier GPU. The CPU’s 91st percentile ranking suggests it can handle the most demanding productivity tasks with ease. The GPU’s 50th percentile ranking means gaming performance will be average, suitable for 1080p and moderate 1440p gaming, but it will not excel in high-end graphics workloads. The combined percentile of 71 reflects this imbalance, positioning the system as a productivity-first machine with acceptable gaming capabilities. The data suggests that users prioritizing gaming should look for a system with a higher-performing GPU, while users prioritizing CPU-bound tasks will find this configuration exceptionally well-balanced.

Rate My PC: AMD Ryzen AI Embedded P164 + NVIDIA RTX 3000 Mobile Ada Generation

Power Build

System Balance Analysis

AMD Ryzen AI Embedded P164

NVIDIA RTX 3000 Mobile Ada Generation

Market Position

Game Performance Benchmarks

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

Performance Insights

Strong Performance

Bottleneck Detected

Performance Tiers Explained

Ultimate

High-End

Mid-Range

Entry Level

Legacy

CPU Analysis

Gaming Performance

Upgrade Path and Platform

Who Should Build It

Balance and Bottleneck

Usage Scenarios

GPU Analysis

FAQ

Benchmark Performance

4K Gaming Performance

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

1440p Gaming Performance

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

1080p Gaming Performance

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

Related Processors

Related Graphics Cards

Compare Your CPU

Compare Your GPU

Related PC Builds

Same CPU with Different GPUs

Same GPU with Different CPUs

Other Popular Builds