SYSTEM ANALYZER

Rate My PC: AMD Ryzen AI Embedded P164 + NVIDIA Quadro RTX 5000 Max-Q

Get a comprehensive performance analysis of your gaming rig with detailed benchmarks, bottleneck detection, and upgrade recommendations

Build Configuration

Select your components

PROCESSOR (CPU)

▼

GRAPHICS CARD (GPU)

▼

84 Score

Top 16% Ranking

84 / 100

HIGH-END

Power Build

Top 16% of systems. Excellent for 1440p Ultra or 4K High gaming.

1440p Ultra4K High

System Balance Analysis

CPU vs GPU performance ratio

GPU Bottleneck

CPU

95%

GPU

74%

Your GPU is limiting system performance. Consider upgrading to a more powerful graphics card to better utilize your CPU.

PROCESSOR

AMD Ryzen AI Embedded P164

52,901 Benchmark Score

Top 5% Market Ranking

View Full Specs →

GRAPHICS CARD

NVIDIA Quadro RTX 5000 Max-Q

0 Benchmark Score

Top 26% Market Ranking

View Full Specs →

Market Position

How your build compares to others

Budget

0-30

Mid-Range

30-60

High-End

60-85

Enthusiast

85-100

Your Build

Game Performance Benchmarks

Real-world 4K FPS in popular titles

View All Games →

Performance Insights

Tips to maximize your system

Strong Performance

Excellent for 1440p gaming. Most games will run at high/ultra settings smoothly.

Bottleneck Detected

GPU Bottleneck - Upgrading the weaker component will improve overall performance.

Compatible Games See what you can play Compare CPUs Find upgrades Compare GPUs Find upgrades

Performance Tiers Explained

90-100

Ultimate

4K Ultra gaming, VR ready, ray tracing enabled, professional workloads

4K 60+ FPS VR Ready

70-89

High-End

1440p Ultra or 4K High settings, excellent for modern AAA titles

1440p Ultra 4K High

50-69

Mid-Range

1080p Ultra or 1440p Medium, great value for most gamers

1080p Ultra 1440p Med

30-49

Entry Level

1080p Medium settings, suitable for eSports and older titles

1080p Med eSports

0-29

Legacy

Basic gaming, older titles, consider upgrading for modern games

720p-1080p Low Older Games

This analysis examines the AMD Ryzen AI Embedded P164 paired with the NVIDIA Quadro RTX 5000 Max-Q in a laptop configuration. The data provided contains no measured frame rates for this specific combination, so all gaming performance discussions are estimates derived from the individual component benchmark scores. The combined system holds a 71st percentile ranking against all build configurations, placing it in a solidly upper-midrange tier for a mobile workstation.

FAQ

Q: What is the overall performance percentile for this CPU and GPU combination?

A: The combined build ranks at the 71st percentile against all other configurations in the database. This places it above the median but below top-tier enthusiast setups, indicating a capable workstation-class laptop rather than an extreme performance machine.

Q: How does the Ryzen AI Embedded P164 compare to its nearest CPU rivals?

A: The CPU averages a benchmark score of 52,901, which is just 0.1% ahead of the AMD Ryzen 5 9500F and 0.1% behind the Intel Xeon 634. It trails the AMD EPYC 7313P by 0.6% and the AMD Ryzen 9 7900X by 0.7%. This puts it in a tight pack of high-end desktop and server processors.

Q: What are the key specifications of the NVIDIA Quadro RTX 5000 Max-Q?

A: This GPU features 16 GB of GDDR6 memory on a 256-bit bus with 384.0 GB/s bandwidth. It has 3,072 shading units, 192 texture mapping units, 64 ROPs, 48 RT cores, and 384 tensor cores, based on the Turing architecture.

Q: Does this CPU support error-correcting memory?

A: Yes, the AMD Ryzen AI Embedded P164 supports ECC memory. It also supports DDR5 and LPDDR5X memory types over a dual-channel bus, with a maximum memory bandwidth of 89.6 GB/s.

Q: What is the socket type and PCIe generation for this processor?

A: The CPU uses the AMD Socket FP8 and provides 16 PCIe Gen 4 lanes from the CPU itself. The GPU, however, connects via PCIe 3.0 x16.

Q: What is the production status of the two main components?

A: The AMD Ryzen AI Embedded P164 is marked as "Active" in production, while the NVIDIA Quadro RTX 5000 Max-Q is listed as "End-of-life." The GPU was released in May 2019, whereas the CPU has a release date of March 2026.

Q: What integrated graphics does the CPU include?

A: The Ryzen AI Embedded P164 includes a Radeon 880M integrated GPU. This is in addition to the discrete NVIDIA Quadro RTX 5000 Max-Q, allowing for potential power savings during light tasks.

Benchmark Performance

The data shows a clear split in capability between the CPU and GPU components. The processor achieves a strong 91st percentile ranking among all CPUs, with an average benchmark score of 52,901. This score places it competitively against a cluster of high-end processors, including the AMD Ryzen 9 7900X which it trails by only 0.7%. The CPU’s single-thread score of 4,029 and multithread score of 25,889 indicate balanced performance across both lightly-threaded and heavily-parallel workloads.

In contrast, the NVIDIA Quadro RTX 5000 Max-Q sits at exactly the 50th percentile among all GPUs, with an average benchmark score of zero in the provided data. This median placement suggests the GPU is an average performer by modern standards, far from the top of the charts. The pairing of a 91st-percentile CPU with a 50th-percentile GPU creates an interesting imbalance where the processor is clearly the stronger component relative to its peers.

The combined percentile of 71 reflects this mixed profile, pulling the overall system above the median but not into the upper echelons of performance. The CPU’s floating-point math score of 55,799 and integer math score of 87,940 are robust, while the GPU’s FP32 throughput of 8.294 TFLOPS is moderate. This combination suggests a machine that excels at CPU-bound tasks like compilation or scientific computing but is only average for GPU-accelerated rendering or gaming.

CPU Analysis

The AMD Ryzen AI Embedded P164 is an 8-core, 16-thread processor based on the Gorgon Point codename, utilizing a hybrid Zen 5 / Zen 5c architecture. It operates with a base clock of 2.00 GHz and a boost clock of 5.00 GHz, fabricated on TSMC’s 4 nm process with a die size of 233 mm². The cache hierarchy includes 80 KB of L1 per core, 1 MB of L2 per core, and 8 MB of shared L3 cache, which is relatively modest for a modern high-end chip.

Benchmark results indicate this processor is a powerhouse for its class. The Passmark single-thread score of 4,029 is exceptional, ranking it among the fastest available for tasks that rely on a single core, such as legacy software or certain game engines. The multithread score of 25,889 demonstrates strong scaling across its 16 threads, though the 8 MB L3 cache may limit performance in workloads with large working sets that exceed this capacity.

The data compression score of 327,891 is particularly notable, suggesting excellent performance in data-heavy tasks like file archiving or database operations. The encryption score of 16,055 and extended instructions score of 24,193 indicate robust support for modern security and vectorized workloads. However, the prime number finding score of 71 is low, which might suggest some architectural quirk in that specific test rather than a general weakness. The physics score of 1,210 is moderate, potentially reflecting the mobile power envelope of 28 W TDP.

Who Should Build It

This configuration targets professionals and enthusiasts who need strong CPU performance in a mobile form factor. The 91st-percentile CPU ranking makes it ideal for software developers compiling large codebases, data scientists running complex simulations, or financial analysts processing large datasets. The dual-channel memory with ECC support further cements its suitability for workstations where data integrity is critical.

Content creators who work primarily with CPU-intensive tasks like video encoding or 3D scene preparation will benefit from the 16 threads and high floating-point throughput. The GPU, while only median-ranked, still offers 16 GB of VRAM which is valuable for handling large textures or machine learning models that exceed the memory capacity of consumer cards. Students in engineering or computer science fields would find this a capable machine for coursework and research projects.

Small business workstations requiring reliability and longevity would appreciate the ECC memory support and the CPU’s active production status. The GPU’s end-of-life status, however, suggests this is not a future-proof choice for those needing sustained GPU performance over several years. Gamers at 1080p or 1440p resolution would find it adequate, but those seeking high-refresh 4K gaming would need to look at configurations with a higher GPU percentile.

Balance and Bottleneck

The data reveals a significant bottleneck in the GPU for graphics-intensive workloads. The CPU’s 91st-percentile ranking vastly outperforms the GPU’s 50th-percentile standing, meaning the Quadro RTX 5000 Max-Q will almost certainly limit frame rates in gaming and 3D rendering scenarios. The CPU has ample headroom to feed the GPU, but the GPU’s 8.294 TFLOPS of FP32 performance and 384.0 GB/s memory bandwidth are the constraining factors.

For CPU-bound tasks like data compression or encryption, the system is well-balanced with the processor delivering top-tier scores. The 89.6 GB/s CPU memory bandwidth is sufficient for most compute workloads, though it may become a secondary bottleneck in memory-intensive parallel tasks. The PCIe Gen 4 interface for the CPU and PCIe 3.0 for the GPU creates a mismatch, but this is unlikely to materially impact real-world performance given the GPU’s older architecture.

Power delivery is another consideration, with the CPU’s 28 W TDP and the GPU’s 80 W TDP suggesting a combined thermal envelope that is modest for a laptop. This allows for thinner designs but may cause thermal throttling under sustained combined load. The GPU’s 600 MHz base and 1,350 MHz boost clocks are conservative, indicating the Max-Q design prioritizes efficiency over raw performance.

Usage Scenarios

High-refresh gaming: The GPU’s median percentile and 8.294 TFLOPS suggest it can handle esports titles at high frame rates in 1080p, but AAA games will require reduced settings to maintain 120+ FPS. The CPU’s strong single-thread score of 4,029 helps ensure consistent frame pacing.

Streaming: The 16 CPU threads provide ample headroom for software encoding while gaming, though the GPU’s older Turing architecture includes dedicated encoder hardware that can offload this task. The FP32 performance is adequate for 1080p streaming at medium bitrates.

Video editing: The CPU’s 55,799 floating-point math score accelerates effects and transitions, while the GPU’s 16 GB VRAM handles 4K timelines with multiple layers. Rendering times will be moderate, with the GPU being the limiting factor for GPU-accelerated effects.

3D rendering: The GPU’s 48 RT cores and 384 tensor cores support ray tracing and AI-accelerated denoising, but the 50th-percentile ranking means render times will be average. The CPU’s strong multithread score of 25,889 helps with CPU-based renderers.

Software development: This is a standout scenario, with the CPU’s high single-thread and multithread scores accelerating compilation and testing. The 16 GB GPU memory allows for local testing of large models or datasets.

Student and office work: The system is overqualified for typical productivity tasks, with the CPU’s performance ensuring snappy response in spreadsheets, document processing, and web browsing. The integrated Radeon 880M can handle light graphics tasks while the discrete GPU remains idle for battery savings.

Gaming Performance

The FACT PACK contains no measured FPS rows for this exact CPU and GPU combination, so the following figures are estimates based on the individual benchmark scores. The GPU’s 50th-percentile ranking and FP32 throughput of 8.294 TFLOPS suggest it performs similarly to midrange desktop GPUs from the same era.

At 1080p ultra settings, the Quadro RTX 5000 Max-Q would likely deliver playable frame rates in most titles, possibly exceeding 60 FPS in well-optimized games. The CPU’s 4,029 single-thread score ensures no bottleneck in frame generation. At 1440p, performance would drop, with demanding titles potentially falling below 60 FPS at ultra settings, requiring some adjustments to maintain smooth gameplay.

At 4K resolution, this GPU would struggle to maintain high frame rates, with many modern games dropping below 30 FPS at ultra settings. The 384.0 GB/s memory bandwidth is sufficient for 1080p and 1440p textures, but 4K assets may exceed its effective throughput. The 16 GB VRAM capacity is generous, so texture quality can remain high even if resolution scaling is needed.

Build Overview

This is a laptop-class build (buildClass: "laptop") that combines a high-end mobile CPU with a midrange mobile GPU. The AMD Ryzen AI Embedded P164 is clearly the star of the pairing, with its 91st-percentile CPU ranking placing it among the fastest processors available. The NVIDIA Quadro RTX 5000 Max-Q, at the 50th percentile, is a competent but unremarkable GPU that anchors the system at a combined 71st percentile.

The build represents a workstation-focused design where CPU compute capability takes precedence over graphics performance. The 28 W CPU TDP and 80 W GPU TDP suggest a portable form factor, likely a professional mobile workstation rather than a gaming laptop. The system is well-suited for compute, development, and productivity tasks, with gaming and GPU rendering as secondary considerations.

GPU Analysis

The NVIDIA Quadro RTX 5000 Max-Q is based on the Turing architecture, fabricated on TSMC’s 12 nm process with 13,600 million transistors on a 545 mm² die. It features 3,072 shading units, 192 TMUs, and 64 ROPs, delivering 8.294 TFLOPS of FP32 performance and 16.59 TFLOPS of FP16 performance. The GPU includes 48 RT cores for hardware-accelerated ray tracing and 384 tensor cores for AI workloads.

Memory configuration consists of 16 GB of GDDR6 on a 256-bit bus, providing 384.0 GB/s of bandwidth. The memory clock is rated at 1,500 MHz with 12 Gbps effective speed. The GPU’s 600 MHz base clock and 1,350 MHz boost clock are conservative for the Max-Q design, prioritizing power efficiency over peak performance. The 80 W TDP confirms this efficiency focus.

The GPU supports DirectX 12 Ultimate (12_2), OpenGL 4.6, and Vulkan 1.4, ensuring compatibility with modern graphics APIs. Its 86.40 GPixel/s pixel rate and 259.2 GTexel/s texture rate are moderate figures. As an end-of-life product first released in May 2019, the Quadro RTX 5000 Max-Q is now several generations old, which explains its median percentile ranking against current GPUs.

Upgrade Path and Platform

The CPU is socketed on AMD FP8, which is an embedded platform with an active production status. The processor supports DDR5 and LPDDR5X memory over a dual-channel bus, with a theoretical bandwidth of 89.6 GB/s. ECC memory support is a key feature for workstation reliability. The CPU provides 16 PCIe Gen 4 lanes for peripheral connectivity.

The GPU connects via PCIe 3.0 x16, which is a mismatch with the CPU’s Gen 4 capability. For a future upgrade, replacing the GPU with a newer model would require a motherboard that supports the appropriate interface, though the laptop form factor (buildClass: "laptop") means upgrades are typically limited to external GPU enclosures or complete system replacement.

The suggested PSU is null in the FACT PACK, but the combined 108 W TDP of CPU and GPU indicates a modest power supply would suffice. The GPU has no power connectors and is listed as slotWidth "IGP," suggesting it is soldered or integrated into the motherboard rather than a replaceable MXM module. This limits upgradeability to the CPU and memory, with the GPU being a fixed component. The CPU’s 5.00 GHz boost clock and 28 W TDP suggest headroom for higher sustained performance if cooling allows, making it a solid platform foundation for the remainder of its active production lifecycle.

Rate My PC: AMD Ryzen AI Embedded P164 + NVIDIA Quadro RTX 5000 Max-Q

Power Build

System Balance Analysis

AMD Ryzen AI Embedded P164

NVIDIA Quadro RTX 5000 Max-Q

Market Position

Game Performance Benchmarks

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

Performance Insights

Strong Performance

Bottleneck Detected

Performance Tiers Explained

Ultimate

High-End

Mid-Range

Entry Level

Legacy

FAQ

Benchmark Performance

CPU Analysis

Who Should Build It

Balance and Bottleneck

Usage Scenarios

Gaming Performance

Build Overview

GPU Analysis

Upgrade Path and Platform

4K Gaming Performance

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

1440p Gaming Performance

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

1080p Gaming Performance

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

Related Processors

Related Graphics Cards

Compare Your CPU

Compare Your GPU

Related PC Builds

Same CPU with Different GPUs

Same GPU with Different CPUs

Other Popular Builds