SYSTEM ANALYZER

Rate My PC: AMD Ryzen AI Embedded P164 + NVIDIA Quadro RTX 3000 Mobile Refresh

Get a comprehensive performance analysis of your gaming rig with detailed benchmarks, bottleneck detection, and upgrade recommendations

84 / 100
HIGH-END

Power Build

Top 16% of systems. Excellent for 1440p Ultra or 4K High gaming.

1440p Ultra4K High

System Balance Analysis

CPU vs GPU performance ratio
GPU Bottleneck
CPU
95%
VS
GPU
74%

Your GPU is limiting system performance. Consider upgrading to a more powerful graphics card to better utilize your CPU.

PROCESSOR

AMD Ryzen AI Embedded P164

52,901 Benchmark Score
Top 5% Market Ranking
View Full Specs →
GRAPHICS CARD

NVIDIA Quadro RTX 3000 Mobile Refresh

0 Benchmark Score
Top 26% Market Ranking
View Full Specs →

Market Position

How your build compares to others
Budget
0-30
Mid-Range
30-60
High-End
60-85
Enthusiast
85-100
Your Build

Game Performance Benchmarks

Real-world 4K FPS in popular titles
View All Games →

Performance Insights

Tips to maximize your system

Strong Performance

Excellent for 1440p gaming. Most games will run at high/ultra settings smoothly.

Bottleneck Detected

GPU Bottleneck - Upgrading the weaker component will improve overall performance.

Compatible Games See what you can play Compare CPUs Find upgrades Compare GPUs Find upgrades

Performance Tiers Explained

90-100

Ultimate

4K Ultra gaming, VR ready, ray tracing enabled, professional workloads

4K 60+ FPS VR Ready
70-89

High-End

1440p Ultra or 4K High settings, excellent for modern AAA titles

1440p Ultra 4K High
50-69

Mid-Range

1080p Ultra or 1440p Medium, great value for most gamers

1080p Ultra 1440p Med
30-49

Entry Level

1080p Medium settings, suitable for eSports and older titles

1080p Med eSports
0-29

Legacy

Basic gaming, older titles, consider upgrading for modern games

720p-1080p Low Older Games

This pairing combines an 8-core, 16-thread AMD Ryzen AI Embedded P164 processor with an NVIDIA Quadro RTX 3000 Mobile Refresh GPU inside a laptop chassis. The CPU, built on the Gorgon Point codename with a Zen 5 / Zen 5c generation mix, operates at a 28 W TDP with a base clock of 2.00 GHz and a boost clock of 5.00 GHz. The GPU is a Turing-architecture part from the Quadro Turing-M (Tx000) generation, built on a 12 nm process at TSMC with a die size of 445 mm². Together, this system sits at the 71st percentile across all CPU+GPU combinations in the database, indicating a solid mid-to-upper tier mobile workstation.

CPU Analysis

The AMD Ryzen AI Embedded P164 is an 8-core, 16-thread processor using AMD's Socket FP8. It belongs to the "Gorgon Point" codename and the Ryzen AI Embedded generation, which combines Zen 5 and Zen 5c cores. The chip is manufactured on a 4 nm process at TSMC, with a die size of 233 mm². Clock speeds range from 2.00 GHz base to 5.00 GHz boost, which is a wide frequency envelope that allows the chip to scale from power-efficient idle states to demanding single-threaded bursts. The 28 W TDP places it in the efficient mobile class, suitable for thin-and-light workstations.

Cache topology includes 80 KB of L1 per core, 1 MB of L2 per core, and 8 MB of shared L3 cache. This is not a massive L3 pool by desktop standards, but the dual-channel memory bus with DDR5 or LPDDR5X support provides 89.6 GB/s of memory bandwidth, which is adequate for the core count. The CPU also supports ECC memory, which is a notable feature for reliability-focused workstation workloads. The integrated Radeon 880M graphics provide a fallback display output, though the dedicated GPU handles heavy rendering.

Benchmark data shows a single-thread score of 4029 and a multithread score of 25889 on PassMark. The single-thread result is strong for a mobile chip, reflecting the high 5.00 GHz boost clock. Multithread performance is respectable for 8 cores at 28 W, though not class-leading. The average benchmark score is 52901, placing the CPU at the 91st percentile among all CPUs in the database. This means the processor outperforms roughly nine out of ten CPUs tested, which is impressive for a mobile part.

The nearest rivals in the database provide context. The AMD Ryzen 5 9500F scores 52873, which is 0.1% lower than the P164. The Intel Xeon 634 scores 52974, only 0.1% higher. The AMD EPYC 7313P scores 53206, 0.6% higher, and the AMD Ryzen 9 7900X scores 53288, 0.7% higher. These deltas are tiny, meaning the P164 trades blows with desktop-class server and enthusiast chips despite its mobile power envelope. In real workloads, this translates to a CPU that can handle heavy multi-threaded compilation, rendering, or simulation tasks without being the limiting factor in the system.

Benchmark Performance

The CPU's individual benchmark scores paint a detailed picture of its capabilities. In PassMark data compression, the P164 scores 327891, which is an exceptionally high number indicating strong throughput for compression algorithms. Data encryption scores 16055, showing solid AES performance. Extended instructions score 24193, which reflects good SIMD and AVX execution. Finding prime numbers scores 71, which is a moderate result for this particular test. Floating point math scores 55799, while integer math scores 87940 — the integer result being notably higher, suggesting the Zen 5 cores are well-optimized for general-purpose compute. Multithread score is 25889, physics score is 1210, and random string sorting scores 34801.

The average CPU benchmark score of 52901 places the P164 at the 91st percentile. The nearest rival, the AMD Ryzen 5 9500F, is essentially tied at 0.1% lower, while the Intel Xeon 634 and AMD EPYC 7313P are within 0.6% higher. The AMD Ryzen 9 7900X is 0.7% higher. This clustering means the P164 delivers performance comparable to full-size desktop processors, a remarkable feat for a 28 W mobile chip.

The GPU, NVIDIA Quadro RTX 3000 Mobile Refresh, has no individual benchmark scores listed and sits at the 50th percentile among all GPUs. This is a median position, meaning the GPU is neither a standout performer nor a weak link in the database. However, the GPU's average benchmark score is listed as 0, and there are no nearest rivals provided, so direct GPU-to-GPU comparisons are not possible from the data. The combined system percentile is 71, which is higher than the GPU's individual 50th percentile, indicating that the CPU is the stronger component in this pairing.

The combined picture is a system where the CPU is clearly above average, and the GPU is average. For workloads that are CPU-bound, this system will perform well above the median. For GPU-bound tasks, it will perform at the median level. The data shows no measured FPS rows exist for this exact combination, so all gaming performance figures are estimates derived from the benchmark scores.

Upgrade Path and Platform

The CPU uses AMD Socket FP8, which is a mobile-specific socket. The memory support includes DDR5 and LPDDR5X in a dual-channel configuration, with a memory bandwidth of 89.6 GB/s. ECC memory is supported, which is important for data integrity in workstation use. The CPU provides PCIe Gen 4 with 16 lanes, which is the current standard for mobile platforms and offers ample bandwidth for a dedicated GPU and fast NVMe storage.

The GPU is a mobile MXM module with a PCIe 3.0 x16 interface. While PCIe 3.0 is a generation behind the CPU's PCIe 4.0, the bandwidth difference is unlikely to be a bottleneck for this GPU class, given its 6 GB of GDDR6 memory and 336.0 GB/s bandwidth. The GPU has no power connectors, drawing its power from the MXM slot, which is standard for mobile modules.

The CPU TDP is 28 W, and the GPU TDP is 80 W, totaling 108 W for the core compute components. There is no suggested PSU listed for this build, but the combined TDP indicates that a laptop power adapter in the range of 130 W to 180 W would be typical for such a system, though no specific wattage is stated in the data. Given the 28 W CPU and 80 W GPU, the power delivery is modest, and the system is designed for thermal efficiency rather than extreme performance.

A sensible next upgrade path for this platform would involve increasing memory capacity, since the dual-channel DDR5/LPDDR5X support allows for larger configurations. The CPU's 8 cores and 16 threads are already well-balanced for most workloads, so a CPU upgrade would require a new socket and platform. The GPU could potentially be upgraded if the MXM form factor allows, but the Quadro RTX 3000 Mobile Refresh is an end-of-life product, so newer options would require a new laptop. The PCIe 4.0 lanes from the CPU provide headroom for future storage and peripheral upgrades.

Balance and Bottleneck

The data shows a clear imbalance between the CPU and GPU. The CPU sits at the 91st percentile among all CPUs, while the GPU sits at the 50th percentile among all GPUs. This means the CPU is far stronger relative to its peers than the GPU is relative to its peers. In CPU-bound workloads, such as data compression (score 327891), integer math (87940), or multithreaded tasks (25889), the system will perform exceptionally well. In GPU-bound workloads, the system will perform at the median level.

The combined percentile is 71, which is between the CPU's 91 and the GPU's 50. This suggests that the system's overall performance is dragged down by the GPU in graphics-intensive tasks. For a gaming or rendering workload, the GPU will be the limiting factor. For a compilation or data analysis workload, the CPU will dominate and the GPU will be underutilized.

FPS scaling in games would follow this pattern. At lower resolutions, where the CPU is more important, frame rates would be higher relative to other systems with similar GPUs. At higher resolutions, where the GPU becomes the bottleneck, frame rates would fall to the GPU's median level. Since no measured FPS data exists, these are estimates based on the benchmark scores.

The CPU's high single-thread score of 4029 and multithread score of 25889 indicate that it can feed even a faster GPU without becoming a bottleneck in most scenarios. However, the GPU's 5.299 TFLOPS of FP32 performance and 88.32 GPixel/s pixel rate are modest by current standards, so the GPU will be the limiting factor in graphically intensive tasks.

FAQ

Q: What is the processor's core and thread count?

A: The AMD Ryzen AI Embedded P164 has 8 cores and 16 threads, with a base clock of 2.00 GHz and a boost clock of 5.00 GHz.

Q: How does the CPU compare to its nearest rivals?

A: The CPU's average benchmark score is 52901, which is 0.1% higher than the AMD Ryzen 5 9500F, 0.1% lower than the Intel Xeon 634, 0.6% lower than the AMD EPYC 7313P, and 0.7% lower than the AMD Ryzen 9 7900X.

Q: What memory types does the system support?

A: The CPU supports DDR5 and LPDDR5X memory in a dual-channel configuration, with a memory bandwidth of 89.6 GB/s. ECC memory is also supported.

Q: What is the GPU's memory configuration?

A: The NVIDIA Quadro RTX 3000 Mobile Refresh has 6 GB of GDDR6 memory on a 192-bit bus, providing 336.0 GB/s of bandwidth.

Q: Is the GPU production status active?

A: No, the GPU is end-of-life, with a release date of 2019-05-26. The CPU is active, with a release date of 2026-03-08.

Q: What is the CPU's percentile ranking?

A: The CPU is at the 91st percentile among all CPUs, meaning it outperforms approximately 91% of CPUs in the database.

Q: What is the combined system percentile?

A: The combined CPU+GPU system is at the 71st percentile among all builds in the database.

Usage Scenarios

High-refresh gaming: The GPU's 5.299 TFLOPS FP32 performance and 50th percentile ranking indicate that this system is not designed for high-refresh gaming at high settings. At 1080p with reduced settings, it could manage playable frame rates, but the GPU will be the limiting factor. The CPU's strong single-thread score of 4029 will help maintain frame pacing, but the GPU's modest pixel rate of 88.32 GPixel/s will cap overall throughput.

Streaming: The CPU's 8 cores and 16 threads, combined with a multithread score of 25889, are sufficient for software encoding while gaming. The GPU's 240 tensor cores can assist with AI-based encoding features, but the overall GPU performance is average, so the streaming experience will be smooth on the CPU side but limited by the GPU's rendering capabilities.

Video editing: The CPU's high integer math score of 87940 and data compression score of 327891 indicate strong performance for codec processing and file handling. The GPU's 6 GB of VRAM and 336.0 GB/s bandwidth are adequate for 1080p and some 4K editing, but the 50th percentile GPU ranking means effects-heavy timelines will render slower than on higher-tier GPUs.

3D rendering: The CPU's 8 cores will handle viewport and simulation tasks well, with a multithread score of 25889. The GPU's 1920 shading units and 30 RT cores provide ray tracing capability, but the 5.299 TFLOPS FP32 performance is modest for GPU rendering. This system is better suited for CPU-based rendering or light GPU rendering tasks.

Software development: The CPU is the star here, with a single-thread score of 4029 that accelerates compilation and a multithread score of 25889 that handles parallel builds. The 91st percentile CPU ranking means this system will compile code faster than most desktops. The GPU is largely irrelevant for development tasks, so the 50th percentile ranking does not impact this scenario.

Student and office work: The 28 W CPU TDP and integrated Radeon 880M graphics provide an efficient baseline for productivity tasks. The CPU's 91st percentile ranking ensures smooth multitasking, while the dedicated GPU is available for any graphics-accelerated applications. The ECC memory support adds reliability for long-running academic computations.

Who Should Build It

This system targets users who need strong CPU performance in a laptop form factor. The 91st percentile CPU ranking makes it ideal for software developers who compile large codebases, data analysts running statistical models, and engineers running simulation software. The 8-core, 16-thread configuration at 28 W TDP means it can sustain heavy workloads without excessive heat or fan noise.

Content creators who work primarily with CPU-bound tasks will benefit from this pairing. Video editors using software encoders, 3D artists doing CPU-based physics simulations, and photographers processing large batches of images will all see above-average performance. The GPU's 50th percentile ranking means it is suitable for casual gaming and light GPU acceleration, but it is not a primary selling point.

Students in engineering, computer science, or data science programs will find this system capable of handling their coursework. The ECC memory support is a rare feature in mobile systems that adds data integrity for long-running research computations. Small business workstations that run database queries, financial models, or custom applications will also benefit from the CPU's strong integer and multithread performance.

The system is less suitable for gamers seeking high frame rates at high resolutions, as the GPU's median ranking will limit performance. It is also not ideal for AI researchers who need massive GPU compute, as the 5.299 TFLOPS FP32 performance is modest. The target user is a professional or student who prioritizes CPU throughput and needs a capable GPU for occasional graphics work.

Build Overview

This is a laptop-class build combining the AMD Ryzen AI Embedded P164 CPU with the NVIDIA Quadro RTX 3000 Mobile Refresh GPU. The CPU is an active, current-generation processor from the Ryzen AI Embedded line, while the GPU is an end-of-life Turing-architecture mobile workstation part. The system sits at the 71st combined percentile, which places it in the upper-middle tier of all builds in the database.

The CPU is the dominant component, at the 91st percentile, while the GPU is exactly at the median at the 50th percentile. This creates an asymmetric profile where the system excels at CPU-intensive tasks and delivers average performance in GPU-intensive tasks. The 28 W CPU and 80 W GPU TDPs indicate a power-efficient design suitable for a professional laptop.

The platform uses AMD Socket FP8 with PCIe Gen 4 from the CPU and PCIe 3.0 for the GPU. Memory support includes DDR5 and LPDDR5X with ECC capability. The build class is laptop, meaning all components are soldered or module-based rather than user-upgradeable in the traditional desktop sense. This is a complete, integrated mobile workstation rather than a DIY desktop system.

GPU Analysis

The NVIDIA Quadro RTX 3000 Mobile Refresh is based on the Turing architecture, manufactured on a 12 nm process at TSMC. The chip contains 10,800 million transistors on a 445 mm² die, with a transistor density of 24.3 million per mm². The GPU has 1920 shading units, 120 texture mapping units, and 64 raster output units. It also includes 30 RT cores and 240 tensor cores, providing hardware support for ray tracing and AI-accelerated workloads.

Clock speeds are 945 MHz base and 1380 MHz boost, with memory running at 1750 MHz or 14 Gbps effective. The 6 GB of GDDR6 memory on a 192-bit bus provides 336.0 GB/s of bandwidth. The pixel rate is 88.32 GPixel/s, and the texture rate is 165.6 GTexel/s. FP32 performance is 5.299 TFLOPS, with FP16 performance at 10.60 TFLOPS using a 2:1 ratio.

The GPU supports DirectX 12 Ultimate (12_2), OpenGL 4.6, and Vulkan 1.4, making it compatible with modern graphics APIs. The 80 W TDP is typical for a mobile workstation GPU. The GPU uses an MXM Module slot, which is a removable form factor, though the production status is end-of-life with a release date of 2019-05-26.

The GPU has no benchmark scores listed in the data, and its percentile ranking is 50th among all GPUs. This places it at the median, meaning it performs better than half of all GPUs but worse than the other half. The 5.299 TFLOPS FP32 performance is modest for rendering tasks, but the 30 RT cores and 240 tensor cores provide dedicated hardware for ray tracing and AI inference. The 6 GB VRAM may be limiting for large textures or complex scenes, but it is adequate for most professional applications at 1080p or 1440p.

Gaming Performance

There are no measured FPS rows for this exact CPU+GPU combination in the FACT PACK. All gaming performance figures discussed here are estimates derived from the benchmark scores and should be treated as approximations.

The GPU's 50th percentile ranking and 5.299 TFLOPS FP32 performance suggest this system can handle esports titles and older games at 1080p with high settings. For modern AAA games at 1080p, the GPU will likely deliver medium to high settings at playable frame rates, though the 6 GB VRAM may cause texture-related stutters in games that exceed that capacity. At 1440p, the GPU will struggle with demanding titles, and users would need to reduce settings to maintain smooth performance.

The CPU's strong single-thread score of 4029 ensures that frame pacing is consistent and the CPU will not bottleneck the GPU in most scenarios. The multithread score of 25889 helps in games that use multiple cores, though most titles still favor single-thread performance. The system's combined 71st percentile indicates that gaming performance will be above the median for the database, but not exceptional.

The data shows no measured FPS figures, so the actual gaming experience could vary based on driver optimization, thermal headroom, and game-specific engine characteristics. The estimates provided here are based on the hardware's raw compute capabilities and relative rankings.