SYSTEM ANALYZER

Rate My PC: AMD Ryzen AI Embedded P164 + NVIDIA Quadro RTX 3000 Mobile

Get a comprehensive performance analysis of your gaming rig with detailed benchmarks, bottleneck detection, and upgrade recommendations

Build Configuration

Select your components

PROCESSOR (CPU)

▼

GRAPHICS CARD (GPU)

▼

85 Score

Top 15% Ranking

85 / 100

HIGH-END

Power Build

Top 15% of systems. Excellent for 1440p Ultra or 4K High gaming.

1440p Ultra4K High

System Balance Analysis

CPU vs GPU performance ratio

Well Balanced

CPU

95%

GPU

76%

PROCESSOR

AMD Ryzen AI Embedded P164

52,901 Benchmark Score

Top 5% Market Ranking

View Full Specs →

GRAPHICS CARD

NVIDIA Quadro RTX 3000 Mobile

1,285 Benchmark Score

Top 24% Market Ranking

View Full Specs →

Market Position

How your build compares to others

Budget

0-30

Mid-Range

30-60

High-End

60-85

Enthusiast

85-100

Your Build

Game Performance Benchmarks

Real-world 4K FPS in popular titles

View All Games →

Performance Insights

Tips to maximize your system

Strong Performance

Excellent for 1440p gaming. Most games will run at high/ultra settings smoothly.

Compatible Games See what you can play Compare CPUs Find upgrades Compare GPUs Find upgrades

Performance Tiers Explained

90-100

Ultimate

4K Ultra gaming, VR ready, ray tracing enabled, professional workloads

4K 60+ FPS VR Ready

70-89

High-End

1440p Ultra or 4K High settings, excellent for modern AAA titles

1440p Ultra 4K High

50-69

Mid-Range

1080p Ultra or 1440p Medium, great value for most gamers

1080p Ultra 1440p Med

30-49

Entry Level

1080p Medium settings, suitable for eSports and older titles

1080p Med eSports

0-29

Legacy

Basic gaming, older titles, consider upgrading for modern games

720p-1080p Low Older Games

# CPU Analysis

The AMD Ryzen AI Embedded P164 is an 8-core, 16-thread mobile processor built on TSMC's 4 nm process, using the Gorgon Point codename and a Zen 5 / Zen 5c hybrid architecture. It operates with a base clock of 2.00 GHz and a boost clock of 5.00 GHz, within a 28 W TDP envelope. The chip features a three-tier cache hierarchy: 80 KB of L1 per core, 1 MB of L2 per core, and 8 MB of shared L3 cache. The die size is 233 mm², and the processor is manufactured for the AMD Socket FP8 platform.

Benchmark results show a strong all-round performer. The PassMark single-thread score of 4029 places it among the faster mobile CPUs for lightly threaded tasks, while the multithread score of 25889 indicates robust parallel throughput. Integer math scores 87940, floating-point math scores 55799, and extended instructions (SIMD) score 24193. Data compression reaches 327891, while encryption scores 16055 and random string sorting scores 34801. The physics score of 1210 and prime number finding score of 71 round out the compute profile.

The average benchmark score of 52901 places this CPU at the 91st percentile of all CPUs in the database, indicating it outperforms the vast majority of processors. Its nearest rivals are tightly clustered: the AMD Ryzen 5 9500F scores 52873 (0.1% behind), the Intel Xeon 634 scores 52974 (0.1% ahead), the AMD EPYC 7313P scores 53206 (0.6% ahead), and the AMD Ryzen 9 7900X scores 53288 (0.7% ahead). This sub-1% spread means the P164 trades blows with these desktop-class parts, which is remarkable for a 28 W mobile chip.

For real workloads, the single-thread score of 4029 translates to snappy responsiveness in office applications, web browsing, and light coding tasks. The multithread score of 25889 indicates strong capability for compiling code, running virtual machines, or batch-processing data. The floating-point and SIMD scores (55799 and 24193) suggest solid performance for scientific computing and engineering simulations, though not at the level of dedicated workstation CPUs. The data compression and encryption scores (327891 and 16055) point to efficient handling of archived files and encrypted communications, useful for IT administrators and security-conscious users.

The memory subsystem supports DDR5 and LPDDR5X in dual-channel mode, with a bandwidth of 89.6 GB/s. ECC memory is supported, which is a notable feature for reliability-critical embedded or workstation applications. PCIe Gen 4 with 16 lanes (CPU only) provides adequate connectivity for discrete GPUs and NVMe storage. The integrated Radeon 880M graphics offer a fallback display output, though the system pairs with a discrete GPU.

# GPU Analysis

The NVIDIA Quadro RTX 3000 Mobile is a Turing-architecture GPU built on a 12 nm TSMC process, with a die size of 445 mm² containing 10,800 million transistors (transistor density of 24.3M per mm²). It is part of the Quadro Turing-M (Tx000) generation, released in 2019, and is now end-of-life. The GPU features 1920 shading units, 120 texture mapping units, and 64 raster output units. It includes 30 RT cores for ray tracing and 240 tensor cores for AI acceleration tasks.

Memory configuration consists of 6 GB of GDDR6 on a 192-bit bus, delivering 336.0 GB/s of bandwidth. The memory clock runs at 1750 MHz (14 Gbps effective). The GPU's base clock is 945 MHz, with a boost clock of 1380 MHz. Pixel rate is 88.32 GPixel/s, and texture rate is 165.6 GTexel/s. Floating-point performance is rated at 5.299 TFLOPS for FP32 and 10.60 TFLOPS for FP16 (at 2:1 ratio). The TDP is 80 W, and the card uses an MXM module form factor with no external power connectors. The bus interface is PCIe 3.0 x16, and display outputs are portable-device dependent.

The only benchmark score available is 3DMark Steel Nomad DX12, which returns 1285. This places the GPU at the 7th percentile of all GPUs, meaning it is slower than roughly 93% of the database. Its nearest rivals show a tight cluster: the NVIDIA GeForce GT 610 scores 1281 (0.3% behind), the AMD Radeon R9 380 scores 1293 (0.6% ahead), the NVIDIA GeForce GT 520 scores 1267 (1.4% behind), and the NVIDIA NVS 4200M scores 1267 (1.4% behind). The Quadro RTX 3000 Mobile is statistically tied with these very low-end parts, which is a stark indication of its modest performance level in modern DirectX 12 workloads.

For rendering tasks, the FP32 throughput of 5.299 TFLOPS is sufficient for light 3D modeling and CAD, but will struggle with complex scenes or high-resolution textures. The 6 GB VRAM and 336.0 GB/s bandwidth are adequate for 1080p workloads but will become a bottleneck at higher resolutions or with large texture sets. The RT cores (30) and tensor cores (240) enable hardware-accelerated ray tracing and DLSS, though the raw compute power limits their effectiveness in demanding scenes. The pixel rate of 88.32 GPixel/s and texture rate of 165.6 GTexel/s indicate that fill-rate-bound operations will be limited.

# Gaming Performance

No measured FPS data exists for this exact CPU+GPU combination — the FACT PACK contains no measuredFps entries. All gaming frame rates discussed below are estimates derived from the benchmark scores and should be treated as approximations rather than lab-tested results.

The GPU's 3DMark Steel Nomad DX12 score of 1285, sitting at the 7th percentile, indicates very low performance in modern DirectX 12 titles. This GPU is far better suited to older or less demanding games than to current AAA releases. For esports titles like Counter-Strike 2 or League of Legends, the CPU's strong single-thread score of 4029 could push frame rates to playable levels, potentially exceeding 60 FPS at 1080p with medium settings. However, the GPU's 5.299 TFLOPS FP32 throughput will cap performance in graphically intensive scenes.

For modern AAA games at 1080p, expect frame rates in the 20-40 FPS range on ultra settings, based on the GPU's low percentile ranking. Lowering settings to medium or high could yield 40-60 FPS in less demanding titles, but the 6 GB VRAM will limit texture quality in games that require more memory. At 1440p or 4K, the GPU will struggle to maintain 30 FPS even at reduced settings. The 30 RT cores are present, but ray-traced effects will impose a heavy penalty on an already weak GPU; expect single-digit FPS with ray tracing enabled in most titles.

The CPU, by contrast, is not the limiting factor for gaming — its 91st percentile ranking and single-thread score of 4029 are more than adequate for feeding frames to this GPU. The bottleneck will always be the GPU in gaming scenarios. For older titles (pre-2018) or indie games, the system can deliver smooth 60+ FPS at 1080p. For competitive shooters with low graphical demands, the high CPU boost clock of 5.00 GHz will help maintain high frame rates, though the GPU's 7th percentile ranking caps the ceiling.

# FAQ

Q: What is the CPU's percentile ranking among all processors?

A: The AMD Ryzen AI Embedded P164 sits at the 91st percentile of all CPUs, with an average benchmark score of 52901.

Q: How does the GPU compare to its nearest rivals?

A: The Quadro RTX 3000 Mobile scores 1285 in 3DMark Steel Nomad DX12, which is 0.3% ahead of the GeForce GT 610 (1281), 0.6% behind the Radeon R9 380 (1293), and 1.4% ahead of both the GeForce GT 520 and NVS 4200M (1267 each).

Q: Is ECC memory supported by this CPU?

A: Yes, the AMD Ryzen AI Embedded P164 supports ECC memory, which is valuable for error-sensitive workloads in embedded or workstation environments.

Q: What is the GPU's memory bandwidth and capacity?

A: The Quadro RTX 3000 Mobile has 6 GB of GDDR6 memory on a 192-bit bus, delivering 336.0 GB/s of bandwidth.

Q: What is the combined percentile of this CPU+GPU pairing?

A: The build ranks at the 49th combined percentile, indicating it sits near the midpoint of all CPU+GPU combinations in the database.

Q: Does the GPU support ray tracing and tensor operations?

A: Yes, it has 30 RT cores and 240 tensor cores, enabling hardware-accelerated ray tracing and AI-based features, though its overall compute power is limited.

Q: What is the CPU's memory bandwidth?

A: The CPU supports dual-channel DDR5 or LPDDR5X memory with a bandwidth of 89.6 GB/s.

# Benchmark Performance

The CPU delivers an average benchmark score of 52901, placing it at the 91st percentile among all processors. Its nearest rival, the AMD Ryzen 5 9500F, scores 52873, a negligible 0.1% difference. The Intel Xeon 634 (52974) is 0.1% ahead, the AMD EPYC 7313P (53206) is 0.6% ahead, and the AMD Ryzen 9 7900X (53288) is 0.7% ahead. This clustering indicates the P164 performs essentially at parity with these desktop-class CPUs, which is exceptional for a 28 W mobile chip.

The GPU's average benchmark score is 1285 from the 3DMark Steel Nomad DX12 test, placing it at the 7th percentile among all GPUs. Its nearest rivals are clustered within 1.4%: the GeForce GT 610 (1281, 0.3% behind), the Radeon R9 380 (1293, 0.6% ahead), and both the GeForce GT 520 and NVS 4200M (1267, 1.4% behind). The GPU's performance is statistically indistinguishable from these very low-end parts, confirming its position near the bottom of the performance ladder.

The combined picture is one of stark asymmetry. The CPU is a high-performer in the top decile of all processors, while the GPU is in the bottom decile. The combined percentile of 49 reflects this average of extremes — the system is neither a high-end gaming rig nor a low-end office machine. In CPU-bound tasks like compilation, data processing, or virtualization, the system will perform admirably. In GPU-bound tasks like modern gaming, 3D rendering, or video encoding, it will lag severely.

# Who Should Build It

This pairing targets users who need strong CPU compute power but have modest graphical requirements. The 91st percentile CPU is ideal for software developers who compile code, run multiple virtual machines, or handle data analysis — the multithread score of 25889 and integer math score of 87940 support these workloads. Students in computer science, engineering, or data science programs will benefit from the CPU's performance for coursework while not needing high-end graphics.

Small business workstations for accounting, database management, or office productivity will find the CPU more than adequate, and the ECC memory support adds reliability for financial data integrity. The integrated Radeon 880M graphics provide a fallback, though the discrete Quadro GPU handles light CAD or 2D design work. IT administrators who routinely compress or encrypt data will appreciate the data compression score of 327891 and encryption score of 16055.

Gamers should skip this build unless their library consists mainly of older titles or esports games with low graphical demands. Content creators working in video editing will find the CPU strong for encoding and effects, but the GPU's 7th percentile ranking will hamper GPU-accelerated rendering. For 3D modeling, the 6 GB VRAM and RT cores offer entry-level capability, but serious rendering work will be slow.

# Usage Scenarios

High-refresh gaming: Not viable. The GPU's 7th percentile ranking and 1285 Steel Nomad score cap frame rates well below the 144 Hz or 240 Hz thresholds. Even at 1080p with reduced settings, expect frame rates in the 40-60 FPS range for modern titles, with older games possibly reaching 60+ FPS thanks to the CPU's single-thread score of 4029.

Streaming: The CPU's 8 cores and 16 threads can handle software encoding at reasonable quality, with the multithread score of 25889 providing headroom for simultaneous gaming and encoding. However, the GPU's weak performance means the game itself will run poorly, making streaming a frustrating experience for graphically demanding titles.

Video editing: The CPU excels in this role. The float point math score of 55799 and extended instructions score of 24193 accelerate effects and filters, while the multithread score handles timeline rendering. The GPU's 6 GB VRAM and 5.299 TFLOPS can assist with some effects, but 4K editing will be sluggish.

3D rendering: The GPU's 5.299 TFLOPS FP32 and 30 RT cores provide entry-level ray tracing capability, but the 7th percentile ranking means render times will be long. The CPU can handle scene preparation and physics (score 1210), but final renders will be GPU-bound and slow.

Software development: This is the system's sweet spot. The CPU's single-thread score of 4029 accelerates compilation, the multithread score of 25889 speeds up parallel builds, and the memory bandwidth of 89.6 GB/s reduces I/O bottlenecks. The GPU is irrelevant for most development tasks.

Student and office work: The CPU's 91st percentile ranking ensures smooth multitasking across documents, spreadsheets, and web browsers. The integrated Radeon 880M can handle display output, with the Quadro GPU available for any light graphical tasks. The 28 W TDP contributes to long battery life in laptop form.

# Build Overview

This is a laptop-class build (buildClass: "laptop") pairing the AMD Ryzen AI Embedded P164 — a high-end mobile CPU at the 91st percentile — with the NVIDIA Quadro RTX 3000 Mobile — a low-end mobile GPU at the 7th percentile. The combined percentile of 49 places this system exactly at the midpoint of all CPU+GPU pairings in the database, reflecting the extreme disparity between its components.

The CPU is a modern 8-core, 16-thread processor on the Zen 5 / Zen 5c architecture, manufactured on a 4 nm TSMC process. It offers desktop-class performance in a 28 W thermal envelope, evidenced by its statistical tie with the Ryzen 9 7900X and EPYC 7313P. The GPU is a Turing-architecture part from 2019, now end-of-life, with performance that sits below 93% of all GPUs. The pairing is best described as a "workstation-lite" — strong for compute-heavy tasks but weak for graphics-intensive workloads.

# Balance and Bottleneck

The bottleneck in this system is overwhelmingly the GPU. In any workload that involves 3D rendering, gaming, or GPU-accelerated compute, the Quadro RTX 3000 Mobile's 7th percentile ranking will limit performance. The GPU's 1285 Steel Nomad score is over 45 times lower than what a top-tier GPU might achieve, and its nearest rivals are the GeForce GT 610 and NVS 4200M — both entry-level parts from a decade ago. The CPU, by contrast, sits at the 91st percentile, meaning it has substantial headroom to feed the GPU in gaming scenarios; the limiting factor will always be the GPU's fill rate and shader throughput.

In CPU-bound workloads, the balance flips. Tasks like code compilation, data compression, or virtualization will be limited by the CPU's 8 cores and 16 threads, though the 91st percentile ranking means it outperforms most processors. The GPU's contribution in these tasks is negligible. The FPS scaling in gaming scenarios would show minimal improvement from CPU upgrades — the GPU is the hard ceiling. Conversely, GPU upgrades would yield massive gains, as the CPU can easily keep up with a faster discrete GPU.

The asymmetry extends to memory bandwidth: the CPU supports 89.6 GB/s, while the GPU has 336.0 GB/s. This means the GPU is not starved for data, but its compute units are too few to use that bandwidth effectively. The 28 W CPU TDP and 80 W GPU TDP create a total thermal budget of approximately 108 W, which is reasonable for a laptop but limits peak performance compared to desktop parts.

# Upgrade Path and Platform

The CPU uses AMD Socket FP8, which is a mobile socket. The memory support includes DDR5 and LPDDR5X in dual-channel mode, with 89.6 GB/s bandwidth and ECC capability. The CPU provides 16 PCIe Gen 4 lanes, which can connect to a discrete GPU or NVMe storage. The GPU uses a PCIe 3.0 x16 bus interface and is an MXM module, meaning it is technically replaceable if the laptop chassis supports it.

The suggested PSU is null, but the combined TDP of CPU (28 W) and GPU (80 W) totals 108 W, so a typical laptop power adapter in the 130-180 W range would be sufficient. The GPU is end-of-life, with the successor being Ampere-MW, so upgrading to a newer Quadro or GeForce MXM module would be the most impactful change. The CPU's production status is active, released in 2026, so it has a long lifespan ahead.

A sensible next upgrade would be a newer GPU, as the CPU has substantial headroom. The 91st percentile CPU can drive a GPU several tiers higher without becoming a bottleneck. However, the MXM form factor and laptop chassis may limit GPU upgrade options. Alternatively, users could consider a new laptop with a balanced CPU-GPU pairing, since the current system's 49th combined percentile reflects the GPU dragging down an excellent CPU. For desktop users, the same CPU is not available on a desktop socket, so a full platform change would be required. The ECC memory support and 16 PCIe Gen 4 lanes suggest this platform targets embedded or workstation use, where reliability and CPU compute matter more than graphics.

Rate My PC: AMD Ryzen AI Embedded P164 + NVIDIA Quadro RTX 3000 Mobile

Power Build

System Balance Analysis

AMD Ryzen AI Embedded P164

NVIDIA Quadro RTX 3000 Mobile

Market Position

Game Performance Benchmarks

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

Performance Insights

Strong Performance

Performance Tiers Explained

Ultimate

High-End

Mid-Range

Entry Level

Legacy

4K Gaming Performance

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

1440p Gaming Performance

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

1080p Gaming Performance

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

Related Processors

Related Graphics Cards

Compare Your CPU

Compare Your GPU

Related PC Builds

Same CPU with Different GPUs

Same GPU with Different CPUs

Other Popular Builds