SYSTEM ANALYZER

Rate My PC: AMD Ryzen AI Embedded P164 + NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Mobile

Get a comprehensive performance analysis of your gaming rig with detailed benchmarks, bottleneck detection, and upgrade recommendations

Build Configuration

Select your components

PROCESSOR (CPU)

▼

GRAPHICS CARD (GPU)

▼

94 Score

Top 6% Ranking

94 / 100

ULTIMATE READY

Apex Performer

Top 6% of systems. Capable of 4K Ultra gaming and advanced rendering.

4K 60+ FPSVR ReadyRay Tracing

System Balance Analysis

CPU vs GPU performance ratio

Well Balanced

CPU

95%

GPU

93%

PROCESSOR

AMD Ryzen AI Embedded P164

52,901 Benchmark Score

Top 5% Market Ranking

View Full Specs →

GRAPHICS CARD

NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Mobile

27,435 Benchmark Score

Top 7% Market Ranking

View Full Specs →

Market Position

How your build compares to others

Budget

0-30

Mid-Range

30-60

High-End

60-85

Enthusiast

85-100

Your Build

Game Performance Benchmarks

Real-world 4K FPS in popular titles

View All Games →

Performance Insights

Tips to maximize your system

Optimal Performance

Your system is in the top tier. You can run any modern game at maximum settings.

4K Gaming Ready

Consider a 4K 144Hz monitor to fully utilize your hardware capabilities.

Compatible Games See what you can play Compare CPUs Find upgrades Compare GPUs Find upgrades

Performance Tiers Explained

90-100

Ultimate

4K Ultra gaming, VR ready, ray tracing enabled, professional workloads

4K 60+ FPS VR Ready

70-89

High-End

1440p Ultra or 4K High settings, excellent for modern AAA titles

1440p Ultra 4K High

50-69

Mid-Range

1080p Ultra or 1440p Medium, great value for most gamers

1080p Ultra 1440p Med

30-49

Entry Level

1080p Medium settings, suitable for eSports and older titles

1080p Med eSports

0-29

Legacy

Basic gaming, older titles, consider upgrading for modern games

720p-1080p Low Older Games

The AMD Ryzen AI Embedded P164 and NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Mobile combination is a laptop-class pairing that targets high-end mobile performance. No measured FPS rows exist for this exact combination in the data, so all frame-rate discussion is estimated from the benchmark scores rather than direct game testing. The CPU sits in the 91st percentile among all processors, while the GPU ranks in the 73rd percentile among all GPUs, giving the pair a combined percentile of 82. This places the platform firmly in upper-tier mobile territory, though the gap between CPU and GPU percentiles hints at a processor that can outpace its graphics partner in certain workloads.

Gaming Performance

Because the FACT PACK contains no measured FPS data for this CPU-GPU pair, all gaming expectations are estimates derived from the synthetic benchmark scores. The GPU’s PassMark G3D score of 19587 and its 73rd percentile position indicate it should handle modern titles at 1080p and 1440p with high detail settings, though 4K gaming would require significant compromises. The DirectX 12 score of 85 and DirectX 11 score of 179 suggest the GPU is more comfortable with older APIs, while the DirectX 10 score of 116 and DirectX 9 score of 223 point to legacy titles running with ample headroom.

The GeForce RTX 4070 Mobile’s 8 GB of GDDR6 memory on a 128-bit bus with 256.0 GB/s bandwidth provides adequate capacity for current game textures, but demanding titles at higher resolutions may exceed this VRAM buffer. The FP32 throughput of 15.62 TFLOPS is the raw compute figure that correlates with rasterization performance, and the 73rd percentile ranking places it near the AMD Radeon RX 6700 XT (deltaPct 0.0) and NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3090 (deltaPct -0.5). This suggests frame rates in the high refresh range for esports titles at 1080p, with AAA games likely hitting 60-100 FPS at high settings depending on optimization.

The CPU’s single-thread score of 4029 and multithread score of 25889 indicate it will not bottleneck the GPU in most gaming scenarios. For frame pacing, the physics score of 1210 is modest, which may show up in CPU-heavy simulations or games with complex physics engines. The floating-point math score of 55799 and integer math score of 87940 provide strong computational backing for game logic and AI processing. Ray tracing workloads will rely on the 36 RT cores and 144 tensor cores, with the DirectX 12 Ultimate (12_2) API support enabling hardware-accelerated effects, but the lack of measured FPS means exact RT performance remains an estimate.

Upgrade Path and Platform

The platform is built around AMD Socket FP8, which is a mobile-specific socket with no desktop equivalent. The CPU supports DDR5 and LPDDR5X memory in a dual-channel configuration, with a memory bandwidth of 89.6 GB/s and ECC memory support. This is a soldered or embedded platform, as indicated by the “Embedded” branding, so CPU upgrades are not practical. The GPU is also mobile-integrated, meaning neither component can be swapped in a traditional sense. The PCIe Gen 4 interface with 16 lanes from the CPU and a PCIe 4.0 x8 bus for the GPU provides sufficient bandwidth for current storage and expansion, but the laptop form factor limits physical upgrades to RAM and storage.

The CPU’s TDP of 28 W and the GPU’s TDP of 115 W combine for a total thermal envelope of 143 W, which is typical for a performance laptop. The suggested PSU field is null, but the combined TDP suggests a power adapter in the 150-200 W range would be appropriate, though no specific number is available in the data. The GPU has no power connectors listed and is marked as “IGP” slot width, indicating it is soldered to the motherboard. A sensible next upgrade for this platform would be increasing RAM capacity or swapping storage to NVMe drives, since the CPU and GPU are fixed. The memory bus is dual-channel, so populating both channels is essential for achieving the rated 89.6 GB/s bandwidth.

Usage Scenarios

High-refresh gaming: The CPU’s single-thread score of 4029 and the GPU’s 73rd percentile ranking suggest this pair can drive 1080p high-refresh monitors in competitive titles. The DirectX 11 score of 179 and G3D score of 19587 indicate strong rasterization performance, though the lack of measured FPS means exact refresh rates are estimates. For 144Hz panels, esports titles should run comfortably, while AAA games may require medium settings to maintain high frame rates.

Streaming: The CPU’s 8 cores and 16 threads with a multithread score of 25889 provide enough headroom for encoding while gaming. The NVENC encoder on the RTX 4070 Mobile is not explicitly detailed, but the tensor cores (144) and Ada Lovelace architecture suggest hardware encoding capabilities. The data compression score of 327891 and encryption score of 16055 indicate strong throughput for stream encoding tasks, though the GPU’s 8 GB memory may limit simultaneous gaming and streaming at high resolutions.

Video editing: The CPU’s multithread score of 25889 and the GPU’s compute score of 8399 combine for solid render performance. The floating-point math score of 55799 assists with color grading and effects, while the GPU’s FP16 throughput of 15.62 TFLOPS supports half-precision workloads common in video processing. The 8 GB VRAM may be tight for 4K timelines with heavy effects, but 1080p editing should be smooth.

3D rendering: The GPU’s FP32 performance of 15.62 TFLOPS and the CPU’s multithread score of 25889 make this a capable entry-level rendering workstation. The RT cores (36) accelerate ray-traced renders, and the tensor cores (144) enable AI-accelerated denoising. The CPU’s extended instructions score of 24193 and prime number score of 71 indicate strong integer performance for geometry processing, though large scenes may exceed the 8 GB VRAM.

Software development: The CPU’s single-thread score of 4029 and multithread score of 25889 handle compilation tasks efficiently. The data encryption score of 16055 supports secure coding workflows, and the random string sorting score of 34801 indicates fast text processing. The 8 cores and 16 threads allow parallel builds, and the 4 nm process node keeps power draw at 28 W for sustained workloads.

Student and office work: The CPU’s 91st percentile ranking and a single-thread score of 4029 ensure snappy response for productivity applications. The integrated Radeon 880M graphics provide a fallback for display output, and the 28 W TDP allows for long battery life in light workloads. The 89.6 GB/s memory bandwidth supports multitasking with many browser tabs and office documents, though the GPU is overkill for this scenario.

Who Should Build It

This platform targets gamers who want high-refresh 1080p performance and are willing to accept 1440p at reduced settings. The GPU’s 73rd percentile and the CPU’s 91st percentile mean the processor will not hold back the graphics card in most titles, making it suitable for players who prioritize frame rates over resolution. Content creators working with 1080p video or moderate 3D scenes will find the combination of multithread score 25889 and FP32 15.62 TFLOPS adequate, though 4K workflows would benefit from more VRAM than the 8 GB available.

Developers writing multi-threaded applications will appreciate the 8 cores and 16 threads, with the data compression score of 327891 indicating strong performance for build servers or local compilation. Students in engineering or computer science programs can leverage the CPU’s 91st percentile for simulations and the GPU’s compute score of 8399 for CUDA-based assignments. Small business workstations requiring ECC memory support (true for this CPU) and moderate GPU acceleration for design software would find this platform viable, though the mobile form factor limits expansion.

The combined percentile of 82 places this above the average laptop configuration, making it suitable for users who need a single machine for both work and play. The CPU’s nearest rival, the AMD Ryzen 5 9500F (avgScore 52873, deltaPct 0.1), shows the processor performs similarly to a desktop mid-range chip, while the GPU’s near-match with the AMD Radeon RX 6700 XT (avgScore 27425, deltaPct 0.0) indicates desktop-class graphics performance in a mobile package.

Balance and Bottleneck

The data shows a CPU that outperforms its GPU partner in relative terms. The CPU’s 91st percentile versus the GPU’s 73rd percentile creates a 18-point gap, suggesting the processor has more headroom than the graphics card can utilize. In gaming workloads, the GPU will be the limiting factor for frame rates, especially at higher resolutions where the 8 GB VRAM and 256.0 GB/s bandwidth become constraints. The GPU’s DirectX 12 score of 85 is notably lower than its DirectX 11 score of 179, indicating that DX12 titles may not scale as well as older API games.

For CPU-bound tasks like physics simulation, the physics score of 1210 is modest relative to other benchmarks, which could bottleneck games with heavy physics calculations. The multithread score of 25889 is strong, but the single-thread score of 4029, while high, may limit frame rates in games that rely heavily on one core. The memory bandwidth of 89.6 GB/s is shared between CPU and GPU workloads, and in mixed scenarios, data transfer rates could become a secondary bottleneck.

The GPU’s texture rate of 244.1 GTexel/s and pixel rate of 81.36 GPixel/s are balanced for its class, but the 128-bit memory bus limits bandwidth compared to wider-bus competitors. In rendering workloads, the CPU’s floating-point math score of 55799 and integer math score of 87940 provide balanced compute, but the GPU’s compute score of 8399 is lower than its 3D score of 19587, suggesting compute-heavy tasks will not scale as well as graphics tasks.

GPU Analysis

The NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Mobile uses the AD106 chip on TSMC’s 5 nm process with 22,900 million transistors on a 188 mm² die, giving a transistor density of 121.8M per mm². The 8 GB of GDDR6 memory operates at 2000 MHz (16 Gbps effective) across a 128-bit bus, yielding 256.0 GB/s bandwidth. The GPU has 4608 shading units, 144 texture mapping units, and 48 raster output pipelines, with 36 RT cores and 144 tensor cores. Clocks are set at 1395 MHz base and 1695 MHz boost, producing 15.62 TFLOPS of FP32 and FP16 (1:1) throughput, with a pixel rate of 81.36 GPixel/s and texture rate of 244.1 GTexel/s.

The PassMark G3D score of 19587 places it in the 73rd percentile, matching the AMD Radeon RX 6700 XT (deltaPct 0.0) and trailing the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3090 by only 0.5%. This suggests the mobile GPU delivers desktop-class rasterization performance. The DirectX 11 score of 179 is the strongest API result, while DirectX 12 at 85 shows weaker scaling, and DirectX 9 at 223 indicates excellent legacy support. The GPU compute score of 8399 is roughly 43% of the G3D score, showing that compute workloads are less efficient than graphics.

The 36 RT cores and 144 tensor cores enable hardware ray tracing and DLSS, though no specific RT benchmarks exist in the data. The 8 GB VRAM at 256.0 GB/s is sufficient for 1080p gaming but will be strained at 1440p with high-resolution textures. The TDP of 115 W is moderate for a mobile GPU, and the lack of power connectors confirms it is soldered. The Geekbench OpenCL score of 109197 and Vulkan score of 108367 show strong cross-API performance, with Vulkan slightly ahead.

CPU Analysis

The AMD Ryzen AI Embedded P164 features 8 cores and 16 threads based on the Gorgon Point codename and Ryzen AI Embedded generation using Zen 5 and Zen 5c architecture. It runs at a base clock of 2.00 GHz with a boost clock of 5.00 GHz on a 4 nm TSMC process with a 233 mm² die size. The cache hierarchy includes 80 KB L1 per core, 1 MB L2 per core, and 8 MB L3 total. The TDP is 28 W, making it efficient for mobile use, with DDR5 and LPDDR5X memory support in dual-channel configuration at 89.6 GB/s bandwidth, plus ECC support.

Benchmark results show a single-thread score of 4029 and multithread score of 25889, placing the CPU in the 91st percentile overall. The floating-point math score of 55799 and integer math score of 87940 indicate strong compute throughput, while the extended instructions score of 24193 shows good SIMD performance. The physics score of 1210 is relatively low compared to other scores, suggesting the CPU may not excel in physics-heavy simulations. Data compression at 327891 and encryption at 16055 demonstrate solid memory and cryptographic performance.

The nearest rival, AMD Ryzen 5 9500F, scores 52873 (deltaPct 0.1), meaning the embedded chip performs nearly identically to a desktop mid-range processor. The Intel Xeon 634 (52974, deltaPct -0.1) and AMD EPYC 7313P (53206, deltaPct -0.6) are also within 1% of the average score of 52901. This places the CPU in server-class territory despite its 28 W TDP. The boost clock of 5.00 GHz is high for a mobile chip, driving the strong single-thread performance that benefits gaming and legacy applications.

The Radeon 880M integrated graphics provide a fallback display output, and the PCIe Gen 4 with 16 lanes supports fast NVMe storage and the discrete GPU’s x8 interface. The lack of an unlocked multiplier means overclocking is not possible, but the 4 nm process node provides efficiency. The average benchmark score of 52901 is the aggregate across all tests, and the 91st percentile confirms this is a top-tier mobile CPU.

FAQ

Q: Does this laptop combination have measured game frame rates?

A: No. The FACT PACK contains no measured FPS data for this CPU-GPU pair. All gaming performance is estimated from synthetic benchmark scores, including the GPU’s PassMark G3D score of 19587 and CPU’s single-thread score of 4029.

Q: How does the GPU compare to desktop graphics cards?

A: The RTX 4070 Mobile’s average benchmark score of 27435 matches the AMD Radeon RX 6700 XT (deltaPct 0.0) and is within 0.5% of the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3090, indicating desktop-class performance in the 73rd percentile.

Q: Can the CPU be upgraded later?

A: No. The CPU uses AMD Socket FP8, which is a mobile embedded socket, and the GPU is soldered as “IGP” slot width. The platform is not designed for component upgrades beyond RAM and storage.

Q: What memory types does this platform support?

A: It supports DDR5 and LPDDR5X in dual-channel configuration with a memory bandwidth of 89.6 GB/s and ECC memory support, which is unusual for mobile platforms.

Q: Is the 8 GB VRAM enough for modern games?

A: At 1080p, 8 GB of GDDR6 with 256.0 GB/s bandwidth is generally sufficient. At 1440p or with high-resolution textures, the 8 GB capacity may become a limiting factor, as indicated by the GPU’s 73rd percentile ranking.

Q: What is the total power draw of the CPU and GPU together?

A: The CPU has a TDP of 28 W and the GPU has a TDP of 115 W, totaling 143 W. The suggested PSU field is null, so the exact adapter size is not specified, but the combined TDP indicates a high-wattage laptop power brick.

Q: How does the CPU’s performance compare to a desktop Ryzen 5?

A: The CPU’s average benchmark score of 52901 is within 0.1% of the AMD Ryzen 5 9500F (avgScore 52873), meaning it performs equivalently to a desktop mid-range processor despite being a 28 W mobile chip.

Benchmark Performance

The CPU’s average benchmark score is 52901, placing it in the 91st percentile of all CPUs. Its nearest rivals are tightly clustered: the AMD Ryzen 5 9500F scores 52873 (deltaPct 0.1), the Intel Xeon 634 scores 52974 (deltaPct -0.1), the AMD EPYC 7313P scores 53206 (deltaPct -0.6), and the AMD Ryzen 9 7900X scores 53288 (deltaPct -0.7). This shows the embedded CPU performs within 0.7% of desktop processors with significantly higher TDPs, making it an exceptional mobile performer. Key sub-scores include single-thread 4029, multithread 25889, floating-point math 55799, integer math 87940, and data compression 327891.

The GPU’s average benchmark score is 27435, placing it in the 73rd percentile of all GPUs. Its nearest rivals are the AMD Radeon RX 6700 XT (27425, deltaPct 0.0), NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3090 (27565, deltaPct -0.5), NVIDIA RTX PRO 4000 Blackwell (27135, deltaPct 1.1), and AMD Radeon Pro Vega 20 (27839, deltaPct -1.5). The G3D score of 19587 is the primary gaming indicator, while compute at 8399 shows lower compute efficiency. The DirectX 11 score of 179 is the strongest API result, with DirectX 12 at 85 and DirectX 9 at 223.

The combined percentile of 82 reflects the pairing of a top-tier CPU (91st percentile) with a strong GPU (73rd percentile). The gap between the two suggests the CPU has more headroom than the GPU can use in most gaming workloads, but for productivity and compute tasks, the CPU’s multithread score of 25889 will drive performance. The GPU’s 15.62 TFLOPS FP32 throughput and 8 GB VRAM define its limits, while the CPU’s 5.00 GHz boost clock and 8 cores provide ample processing power. Together, they form a balanced mobile platform that excels at 1080p gaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking, with the CPU’s 91st percentile ensuring it never becomes the bottleneck in GPU-bound scenarios.

Rate My PC: AMD Ryzen AI Embedded P164 + NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Mobile

Apex Performer

System Balance Analysis

AMD Ryzen AI Embedded P164

NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Mobile

Market Position

Game Performance Benchmarks

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

Performance Insights

Optimal Performance

4K Gaming Ready

Performance Tiers Explained

Ultimate

High-End

Mid-Range

Entry Level

Legacy

Gaming Performance

Upgrade Path and Platform

Usage Scenarios

Who Should Build It

Balance and Bottleneck

GPU Analysis

CPU Analysis

FAQ

Benchmark Performance

4K Gaming Performance

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

1440p Gaming Performance

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

1080p Gaming Performance

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

Related Processors

Related Graphics Cards

Compare Your CPU

Compare Your GPU

Related PC Builds

Same CPU with Different GPUs

Same GPU with Different CPUs

Other Popular Builds