SYSTEM ANALYZER

Rate My PC: AMD Ryzen AI Embedded P164 + NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Mobile

Get a comprehensive performance analysis of your gaming rig with detailed benchmarks, bottleneck detection, and upgrade recommendations

93 / 100
ULTIMATE READY

Apex Performer

Top 7% of systems. Capable of 4K Ultra gaming and advanced rendering.

4K 60+ FPSVR ReadyRay Tracing

System Balance Analysis

CPU vs GPU performance ratio
Well Balanced
CPU
95%
VS
GPU
92%
PROCESSOR

AMD Ryzen AI Embedded P164

52,901 Benchmark Score
Top 5% Market Ranking
View Full Specs →
GRAPHICS CARD

NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Mobile

22,729 Benchmark Score
Top 8% Market Ranking
View Full Specs →

Market Position

How your build compares to others
Budget
0-30
Mid-Range
30-60
High-End
60-85
Enthusiast
85-100
Your Build

Game Performance Benchmarks

Real-world 4K FPS in popular titles
View All Games →

Performance Insights

Tips to maximize your system

Optimal Performance

Your system is in the top tier. You can run any modern game at maximum settings.

4K Gaming Ready

Consider a 4K 144Hz monitor to fully utilize your hardware capabilities.

Compatible Games See what you can play Compare CPUs Find upgrades Compare GPUs Find upgrades

Performance Tiers Explained

90-100

Ultimate

4K Ultra gaming, VR ready, ray tracing enabled, professional workloads

4K 60+ FPS VR Ready
70-89

High-End

1440p Ultra or 4K High settings, excellent for modern AAA titles

1440p Ultra 4K High
50-69

Mid-Range

1080p Ultra or 1440p Medium, great value for most gamers

1080p Ultra 1440p Med
30-49

Entry Level

1080p Medium settings, suitable for eSports and older titles

1080p Med eSports
0-29

Legacy

Basic gaming, older titles, consider upgrading for modern games

720p-1080p Low Older Games

The AMD Ryzen AI Embedded P164 and NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Mobile form a laptop-class pairing that leans heavily on CPU compute while keeping the GPU in a solidly mid-range position. The CPU holds a 91st percentile rank against all processors, with an average benchmark score of 52,901, while the GPU sits at the 67th percentile with an average score of 22,729. No measured frames-per-second data exists for this exact combination; all gaming discussion below is estimated from the benchmark scores and should be treated as qualitative expectations rather than observed results.

CPU Analysis

The AMD Ryzen AI Embedded P164 is an 8-core, 16-thread mobile processor built on the Gorgon Point codename, using a hybrid Zen 5 / Zen 5c generation architecture. It runs at a 2.00 GHz base clock and boosts to 5.00 GHz, with a thermal design power of 28 W. The chip is fabricated on a 4 nm TSMC process with a die size of 233 mm². Cache is organized as 80 KB of L1 per core, 1 MB of L2 per core, and a shared 8 MB of L3. Memory support includes DDR5 and LPDDR5X over a dual-channel interface, yielding a memory bandwidth of 89.6 GB/s, with ECC support enabled. The CPU exposes PCIe Gen 4 with 16 lanes from the processor itself, and it includes an integrated Radeon 880M graphics unit.

Benchmark results paint a clear picture of a well-rounded CPU. The Passmark multithread score is 25,889, while single-thread performance is 4,029 points. Integer math reaches 87,940, floating-point math 55,799, and extended instructions 24,193. Data compression scores 327,891, data encryption 16,055, prime number finding 71, random string sorting 34,801, and physics 1,210. The average benchmark score of 52,901 places it in the 91st percentile of all CPUs.

Against its nearest rivals, the P164 is essentially neck-and-neck with the AMD Ryzen 5 9500F (average score 52,873, a 0.1% difference), the Intel Xeon 634 (52,974, -0.1%), the AMD EPYC 7313P (53,206, -0.6%), and the AMD Ryzen 9 7900X (53,288, -0.7%). The data shows the P164 sits within a 0.7% band of these desktop and server chips, meaning its multi-threaded output is comparable to those much larger parts. The single-thread score of 4,029 is a strong indicator of snappy responsiveness in daily tasks, while the multithread score of 23,889 suggests it can handle heavy parallel workloads without breaking a sweat. The 8 MB of L3 cache is modest by desktop standards, but the high boost clock and efficient 4 nm node help offset that in latency-sensitive tasks. The integrated Radeon 880M adds a fallback graphics path for light usage, though the primary GPU is the discrete RTX 4060 Mobile.

Balance and Bottleneck

The CPU's average score of 52,901 dwarfs the GPU's average score of 22,729, and their percentiles tell a similar story: CPU at 91st percentile, GPU at 74th. This asymmetry suggests that in many workloads, the CPU is the stronger partner. For CPU-bound tasks like compilation, data compression, or physics simulation, the P164 will carry the system. The multithread score of 25,889 and integer math of 87,940 indicate that the processor can feed the GPU without stalling. Conversely, in graphics-bound scenarios such as high-resolution gaming or heavy shader work, the GPU becomes the limiting factor. The GPU's PassMark G3D score of 17,469 and compute score of 6,816 are modest by comparison, and its 11.61 TFLOPS FP32 throughput is a mid-range figure. The combined percentile of 79 reflects this balance: neither component is a top-5% part, but together they form a coherent mid-high tier laptop.

The absence of measured FPS data means we cannot quantify exact frame rates, but the relative strength of the CPU (91st percentile) versus the GPU (67th percentile) implies that in most games, the GPU will be the bottleneck when settings are raised to ultra. At lower resolutions or with reduced effects, the CPU could become the constraint. The CPU's strong single-thread score of 4,029 suggests it can handle high-refresh 1080p gaming where per-frame draw calls are heavy, but the GPU's 8 GB GDDR6 memory and 256.0 GB/s bandwidth will limit texture-heavy scenes. The power envelope also matters: the CPU's 28 W TDP and GPU's 115 W TDP together create a mobile system that must balance thermals, and the data implies that sustained heavy loads will likely throttle one or both components to manage heat.

Upgrade Path and Platform

The CPU is built for the AMD Socket FP8, a mobile-only socket, which means physical upgrades are effectively impossible without replacing the entire motherboard or laptop. The platform supports DDR5 and LPDDR5X memory, with dual-channel configuration and a 89.6 GB/s bandwidth ceiling. ECC support is present, which is unusual for a consumer mobile chip and may appeal to workstation users. PCIe connectivity is Gen 4 with 16 lanes from the CPU, but the GPU's bus interface is PCIe 4.0 x8, so the CPU's full lane count is not required for the GPU. The GPU itself is an IGP-class slot width with no power connectors, relying on the motherboard's power delivery, and has a suggested PSU of null — meaning no external power supply is required beyond the laptop's own.

For a sensible next upgrade within this platform, the memory bandwidth of 89.6 GB/s is fixed by the controller, so the only realistic CPU-side upgrade would be to a different FP8 processor with similar or better benchmarks, but none are listed in the rival set. On the GPU side, the RTX 4060 Mobile's successor is the GeForce 50 Mobile series, but no specifications for that are provided. The PCIe 4.0 x8 bus is sufficient for the 4060 Mobile's bandwidth needs. The power delivery is constrained by the laptop's internal design, so adding a more powerful GPU would likely require a new chassis. In practical terms, the upgrade path is limited to increasing memory capacity or replacing the whole unit, not swapping individual components.

Who Should Build It

This laptop combination targets users who need strong CPU throughput for work while also wanting a competent discrete GPU for gaming or rendering. The CPU's 91st percentile rank and 16 threads make it well-suited for software developers compiling large projects, data analysts running multi-threaded queries, and students in engineering or scientific disciplines that use parallel processing. The GPU's 67th percentile places it as a mid-range mobile graphics solution, enough for 1080p gaming at high settings and light 3D modeling. Content creators who edit video will benefit from the CPU's strong multithread score of 25,889, which helps with encoding and timeline scrubbing, while the GPU's 2,048 shading units (actually 3,072 shading units) and 24 RT cores handle effects and accelerated previews. Small business workstations that run database operations or virtualization will find the ECC memory support and high data compression score (327,891) useful for integrity-critical workloads. However, the laptop class means portability is a given, so this build is not for users who need a stationary desktop with expansion slots.

Usage Scenarios

High-refresh gaming: The CPU's single-thread score of 4,029 and the GPU's G3D score of 17,469 suggest the system can handle 1080p high-refresh gaming with competitive settings, but without measured FPS, the exact frame rates are unknown. The GPU's 24 RT cores and 96 tensor cores imply ray tracing and DLSS support, which could boost frame rates in supported titles.

Streaming: The CPU's multithread score of 25,889 and the GPU's NVENC (not listed, but the Ada Lovelace architecture includes it) allow for simultaneous gaming and encoding. The CPU's high data compression score (327,891) indicates efficient handling of encoding tasks, though the GPU's compute score of 6,816 is modest for advanced filters.

Video editing: The CPU's floating-point math score of 55,799 and integer math score of 87,940 are strong for timeline processing and effects, while the GPU's 11.61 TFLOPS FP32 helps with GPU-accelerated exports. The 8 GB VRAM is adequate for 1080p or light 4K timelines, but not for heavy 8K work.

3D rendering: The CPU's 16 threads and 52,901 average score provide solid CPU-based rendering performance, while the GPU's 24 RT cores and 96 tensor cores can accelerate ray tracing and AI denoising. However, the GPU's 2.56 GB/s bandwidth (actually 256.0 GB/s) may limit large scenes.

Software development: The CPU's high single-thread score (4,029) and 16 threads make compilation and unit testing fast, and the ECC memory support reduces the risk of memory errors in long runs. The GPU is not a major factor here.

Student and office work: The CPU's low 28 W TDP and integrated Radeon 880M allow the system to run on battery for productivity tasks, with the GPU remaining idle. The PassMark G2D score of 730 is low for the iGPU, but the discrete GPU can be used for heavier tasks.

GPU Analysis

The NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Mobile is based on the AD107 chip, using the Ada Lovelace architecture, fabricated on a 5 nm TSMC process with 18,900 million transistors on a 159 mm² die. It has a base clock of 1545 MHz and a boost clock of 1890 MHz, with memory clock at 2000 MHz (16 Gbps effective). The memory is 8 GB of GDDR6 on a 128-bit bus, providing a bandwidth of 256.0 GB/s. The GPU has 3,072 shading units, 96 TMUs, 48 ROPs, 24 RT cores, and 96 tensor cores. Its pixel rate is 90.72 GPixel/s, texture rate is 181.4 GTexel/s, and it delivers 11.61 TFLOPS for both FP32 and FP16 (1:1). The TDP is 115 W, and it uses no external power connectors, being an IGP-class part.

Benchmark results show a Geekbench OpenCL score of 89,420 and a Vulkan score of 89,569. PassMark scores are: DirectX 10 at 107, DirectX 11 at 157, DirectX 12 at 73, DirectX 9 at 216, G2D at 730, G3D at 17,469, and GPU compute at 6,816. The average benchmark score is 22,729, placing it in the 67th percentile of all GPUs. Compared to its nearest rivals, it is 0.7% slower than the RTX 2080 (average 22,895), 0.8% faster than the Radeon RX 7700 XT (22,549), 1.3% slower than the Intel Arc B580 (23,021), and 1.3% faster than the RTX 5060 Mobile (22,435). This means the RTX 4060 Mobile sits in a tight cluster of GPUs with almost identical average scores, indicating that its performance is essentially interchangeable with those parts in general compute tasks.

The GPU's 8 GB VRAM is sufficient for 1080p gaming with high textures, but 1440p ultra settings may exceed that capacity in some modern titles. The 24 RT cores and 96 tensor cores enable real-time ray tracing and DLSS acceleration, which can improve frame rates in supported games. The FP16 compute of 11.61 TFLOPS is useful for AI and machine learning inference, but not for large training runs.

Gaming Performance

The FACT PACK contains no measured FPS data for this CPU-GPU combination, so all gaming performance figures below are estimates derived from the benchmark scores and should be considered approximate. The CPU's single-thread score of 4,029 and the GPU's G3D score of 17,469 suggest that at 1080p with ultra settings, the system can likely deliver smooth frame rates in many titles, but the exact numbers are unknown. The GPU's 8 GB VRAM is adequate for 1080p ultra textures, and the 256.0 GB/s bandwidth is sufficient for that resolution. At 1440p, the GPU would likely become the bottleneck, and at 4K, the frame rates would drop to playable but not high-refresh levels.

The CPU's high single-thread performance suggests that at lower resolutions (1080p) or with reduced settings, the CPU can keep up with high-refresh monitors, but the GPU's 8 GB VRAM limits texture-heavy scenes. The GPU's ray tracing cores (24) mean that games with RT enabled will run with reduced performance, but DLSS could mitigate that. Without measured FPS, we cannot state specific numbers, but the benchmark scores indicate a system that is competent for 1080p and light 1440p gaming, with CPU-bound performance ahead of GPU-bound performance.

FAQ

Q: What is the CPU's single-thread performance?

A: The PassMark single-thread score is 4,029, which is a strong score for a mobile processor.

Q: How does the GPU compare to the RTX 2080?

A: The RTX 4060 Mobile has an average benchmark score of 22,729, which is 0.7% lower than the RTX 2080's 22,895 score, so the two are essentially equivalent in general performance.

Q: What memory types does the CPU support?

A: The CPU supports DDR5 and LPDDR5X memory in a dual-channel configuration, with a maximum bandwidth of 89.6 GB/s and ECC support.

Q: Does the GPU have ray tracing cores?

A: Yes, the RTX 4060 Mobile has 24 RT cores and 96 tensor cores, which support ray tracing and DLSS.

Q: What is the CPU's cache size?

A: The CPU has 80 KB L1 per core, 1 MB L2 per core, and a total of 8 MB L3 cache.

Q: What is the combined percentile of this build?

A: The combined percentile is 86, meaning it outperforms 86% of all CPU+GPU combinations in the database.

Q: Is the CPU a desktop or mobile part?

A: It is a mobile processor (market segment: Mobile) with a 28 W TDP, designed for laptops.

Benchmark Performance

The CPU achieves an average benchmark score of 52,901, placing it in the 91st percentile of all CPUs. Its nearest rivals are the Ryzen 5 9500F (52,873, +0.1% delta), the Intel Xeon 634 (52,974, -0.1%), the EPYC 7313P (53,206, -0.6%), and the Ryzen 9 7900X (53,288, -0.7%). The GPU achieves an average score of 22,729, placing it in the 67th percentile of all GPUs. Its nearest rivals are the RTX 2080 (22,895, -0.7%), the RX 7700 XT (22,549, +0.8%), the Arc B580 (23,021, -1.3%), and the RTX 5060 Mobile (22,435, +1.3%). The combined percentile of this build is 86, which reflects that the CPU is a strong performer and the GPU is a solid mid-range part. The CPU's score is about 2.3 times higher than the GPU's average score, and the CPU's percentile is 24 points higher, indicating that the system's overall capability is heavily weighted toward the processor.

Build Overview

This is a laptop-class build (buildClass: "laptop") that pairs the AMD Ryzen AI Embedded P164 CPU with the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Mobile GPU. The CPU is an 8-core/16-thread mobile processor with a 5.00 GHz boost clock and a 91st percentile rank, while the GPU is a mid-range Ada Lovelace part with 8 GB GDDR6 and a 67th percentile rank. The combined percentile of 86 places this pairing above the majority of all CPU+GPU combinations in the database. The system is characterized by a strong CPU that handles compute-heavy tasks exceptionally well, while the GPU is capable of 1080p gaming and light 1440p workloads. The lack of measured FPS data means that gaming performance is estimated from the benchmark scores, but the overall tier is that of a high-end mobile workstation that can also serve as a gaming laptop. The CPU's high single-thread and multithread scores, combined with the GPU's mid-range compute, make this a versatile system for developers, students, and content creators who need portability without sacrificing CPU power.