SYSTEM ANALYZER

Rate My PC: AMD Ryzen AI 7 445 + AMD Radeon 860M

Get a comprehensive performance analysis of your gaming rig with detailed benchmarks, bottleneck detection, and upgrade recommendations

Build Configuration

Select your components

PROCESSOR (CPU)

▼

GRAPHICS CARD (GPU)

▼

90 Score

Top 10% Ranking

90 / 100

ULTIMATE READY

Apex Performer

Top 10% of systems. Capable of 4K Ultra gaming and advanced rendering.

4K 60+ FPSVR ReadyRay Tracing

System Balance Analysis

CPU vs GPU performance ratio

Well Balanced

CPU

87%

GPU

93%

PROCESSOR

AMD Ryzen AI 7 445

26,936 Benchmark Score

Top 13% Market Ranking

View Full Specs →

GRAPHICS CARD

AMD Radeon 860M

26,401 Benchmark Score

Top 7% Market Ranking

View Full Specs →

Market Position

How your build compares to others

Budget

0-30

Mid-Range

30-60

High-End

60-85

Enthusiast

85-100

Your Build

Game Performance Benchmarks

Real-world 4K FPS in popular titles

View All Games →

Performance Insights

Tips to maximize your system

Optimal Performance

Your system is in the top tier. You can run any modern game at maximum settings.

4K Gaming Ready

Consider a 4K 144Hz monitor to fully utilize your hardware capabilities.

Compatible Games See what you can play Compare CPUs Find upgrades Compare GPUs Find upgrades

Performance Tiers Explained

90-100

Ultimate

4K Ultra gaming, VR ready, ray tracing enabled, professional workloads

4K 60+ FPS VR Ready

70-89

High-End

1440p Ultra or 4K High settings, excellent for modern AAA titles

1440p Ultra 4K High

50-69

Mid-Range

1080p Ultra or 1440p Medium, great value for most gamers

1080p Ultra 1440p Med

30-49

Entry Level

1080p Medium settings, suitable for eSports and older titles

1080p Med eSports

0-29

Legacy

Basic gaming, older titles, consider upgrading for modern games

720p-1080p Low Older Games

The AMD Ryzen AI 7 445 and AMD Radeon 860M combination represents a highly efficient mobile platform engineered for balanced performance in a 28W TDP envelope. The data indicates a processor that outperforms several desktop stalwarts from previous generations while the integrated GPU delivers discrete-class graphics performance, making this a compelling choice for thin-and-light laptops that can handle both productivity and modern gaming workloads.

CPU Analysis

The AMD Ryzen AI 7 445 is a 6-core, 12-thread processor built on the Zen 5 architecture, codenamed Gorgon Point. It operates with a base clock of 2.00 GHz and a boost clock of 4.60 GHz, all within a 28W TDP. This power envelope is notably efficient for the performance delivered, positioning the chip as a high-efficiency mobile solution fabricated on TSMC's 4nm process node. The processor features a 4 MB L3 cache, with 80 KB of L1 and 1 MB of L2 cache per core, which supports its responsive single-threaded performance.

Benchmark results place the CPU in the 79th percentile among all tested processors, underscoring its strong standing in the current market. The Cinebench R23 multi-core score of 10,590 points indicates substantial parallel processing capability for a 28W part, while the single-core score of 1,806 points demonstrates excellent per-thread performance that is critical for everyday responsiveness and lightly-threaded applications. In the older Cinebench R15 test, the chip scores 1,723 points multi-core and 254 points single-core. PassMark results further illustrate the processor's character: a multi-thread score of 18,115 and a single-thread score of 3,591 show a balanced design that excels in both general productivity and more demanding computational tasks.

The data reveals a processor that trades blows with established desktop parts. The nearest rival, the Intel Core i7-1370P, has an average score of 26,900, which is a mere 0.1% difference from the Ryzen AI 7 445's average benchmark score of 26,936. This places the mobile AMD chip on par with a high-end mobile Intel processor from a recent generation. More notably, the Ryzen AI 7 445 outperforms the AMD Ryzen 7 5700G, a desktop APU, by 0.4% and the Intel Core i9-9900K, a former flagship desktop CPU, by 0.6% in average benchmark scores. This indicates that the Zen 5 architecture provides generational efficiency gains that allow a 28W mobile chip to match or exceed the multi-threaded performance of older, higher-power desktop components.

Benchmark Performance

The overall benchmark picture for this platform is one of impressive capability. The AMD Ryzen AI 7 445 achieves an average benchmark score of 26,936, placing it in the 79th percentile of all CPUs. When combined with the GPU, the platform reaches a combined percentile of 76, indicating a well-matched pair that performs cohesively. The CPU's performance in specific PassMark sub-tests shows its strengths: a floating-point math score of 39,362 and an integer math score of 58,332 highlight strong arithmetic capabilities, while a data compression score of 215,812 shows proficiency in memory-intensive tasks. The extended instructions score of 15,826 suggests robust performance in modern, optimized software.

The CPU's closest rival, the Intel Core i7-1370P, has an average score of 26,900, a delta of just 0.1%, confirming that the Ryzen AI 7 445 is a top-tier competitor in its class. Its performance is also slightly ahead of the AMD Ryzen 5 7545U (26,849, +0.3%) and the AMD Ryzen 7 5700G (27,051, -0.4%). The consistency of these scores indicates that the Ryzen AI 7 445 offers a significant step up from previous-generation mobile processors, delivering performance that was once the domain of desktop-class hardware. The combined platform percentile of 76 reflects that both the CPU and GPU are above-average performers in their respective fields, creating a system with few obvious weak points.

GPU Analysis

The AMD Radeon 860M is an integrated graphics processor based on the RDNA 3.5 architecture, built on the same 4nm TSMC process as the CPU. It features 512 shading units, 32 texture mapping units, and 16 raster operation pipelines. The GPU operates at a base clock of 600 MHz and can boost up to 3000 MHz. It is equipped with 8 ray tracing cores, providing hardware acceleration for ray-traced workloads. The GPU's memory is system-shared, meaning its bandwidth and size are dependent on the system's DDR5 or LPDDR5X memory configuration. The GPU's TDP is listed as 15 W, which is part of the overall platform power budget.

The Radeon 860M's benchmark scores are particularly notable for an integrated solution. It achieves a Geekbench OpenCL score of 22,759 and a Vulkan score of 30,043, placing it in the 72nd percentile of all GPUs. This places its average benchmark score of 26,401 in striking distance of the NVIDIA GeForce MX550, a dedicated entry-level discrete GPU, which scores 26,421, a delta of only -0.1%. The data shows the Radeon 860M is also within 0.3% of the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5060's score of 26,331, though this likely reflects a specific test scenario rather than general equivalence, and is 0.6% behind the AMD Radeon RX 5700 XT 50th Anniversary. The pixel rate is specified as 48.00 GPixel/s and the texture rate as 96.00 GTexel/s, while FP32 performance is rated at 3.072 TFLOPS. These specifications suggest the iGPU is well-suited for 1080p gaming at medium to high settings in many titles, a claim supported by its benchmark positioning near discrete GPUs.

Upgrade Path and Platform

The platform is built on the AMD Socket FP8, which is designed for mobile systems. Memory support includes DDR5 and LPDDR5X, utilizing a dual-channel memory bus that provides a memory bandwidth of 89.6 GB/s. This high bandwidth is critical for the Radeon 860M, which relies on system memory for its frame buffer; the 89.6 GB/s figure is a key factor in the iGPU's ability to perform at the level of a discrete GPU. The CPU provides PCIe Gen 4 connectivity with 14 lanes. The system also supports ECC memory, a feature typically associated with workstation-class reliability, which broadens its appeal for professional use.

The CPU has a TDP of 28W, and the GPU's TDP is 15W, resulting in a combined thermal design power of 43W for the core components. This low power draw means that a laptop based on this platform would not require a large, high-capacity power supply. Upgrading the platform is limited by its mobile nature; the CPU and GPU are soldered onto the motherboard. A sensible next step for users seeking more performance would be to consider a future platform in the same Socket FP8 family with a higher-tier processor, or to rely on an external GPU enclosure, provided the laptop has the necessary connectivity, though the integrated GPU's performance is already sufficient for many tasks.

Balance and Bottleneck

The benchmark data indicates a well-balanced system where the CPU and GPU are closely matched. The CPU's 79th percentile ranking and the GPU's 72nd percentile ranking suggest that neither component is likely to be a severe bottleneck for the other in most workloads. The combined system percentile is 76, which is close to the CPU's individual percentile, suggesting that the CPU is the primary driver of overall system performance in the benchmark suite, but the GPU is not far behind.

In gaming, the balance between the 6-core/12-thread CPU and the Radeon 860M is a key factor. The CPU's strong single-thread performance (3,591 in PassMark) ensures it can feed the GPU in most titles, while the GPU's performance, which rivals the GeForce MX550, means it is the likely limiting factor at higher resolutions and graphical settings. The CPU's multi-core performance (18,115 in PassMark) is strong enough to handle game logic and physics without bottlenecking the GPU in most scenarios. The data suggests that at 1080p, the GPU will be the primary constraint, while at lower resolutions or in CPU-intensive simulation games, the CPU's performance will be more important. There is no single component that is an obvious weak link; the system is designed to perform cohesively.

Who Should Build It

This platform is ideal for users seeking a single, power-efficient device capable of handling a wide range of tasks without the need for a separate discrete GPU. Students and professionals in small business environments will find the Ryzen AI 7 445's performance more than adequate for office productivity, data analysis, and software development. The CPU's high PassMark single-thread score of 3,591 ensures snappy application loading and responsive multitasking, while the multi-thread score of 18,115 can handle compilation tasks and moderate video editing workloads.

Content creators on a budget would benefit from the combination of the strong CPU and the capable iGPU. The Radeon 860M's 3.072 TFLOPS of FP32 performance and support for DirectX 12 Ultimate make it possible to do light 3D rendering and video editing on a laptop without a discrete GPU. Gamers who prioritize portability and are willing to play at 1080p with adjusted settings will find the Radeon 860M's performance, which is on par with the NVIDIA GeForce MX550, to be a compelling feature. This is not a platform for high-end 4K gaming or heavy 3D rendering, but for a mobile-focused user, it represents an excellent balance of performance and efficiency.

Usage Scenarios

High-Refresh Gaming: For esports titles and older games, the Radeon 860M can likely push frame rates high enough to benefit from a 120Hz or 144Hz display, given its Geekbench Vulkan score of 30,043 and performance near the NVIDIA MX550. However, the GPU is the limiting factor, and users should expect to lower settings to achieve high frame rates in more demanding games.
Streaming: The CPU's 6 cores and 12 threads, combined with its 28W TDP, provide enough headroom for software encoding at 1080p, although a dedicated encoder is absent. The PassMark multi-thread score of 18,115 suggests that while streaming and gaming simultaneously, the CPU can handle the extra load without crippling game performance.
Video Editing: The Ryzen AI 7 445's Cinebench R23 multi-core score of 10,590 points allows for reasonably smooth timeline editing and faster-than-realtime export for 1080p projects. The Radeon 860M can assist with effects and rendering, but the system is best suited for light to moderate editing tasks.
3D Rendering: The CPU's performance in Cinebench R15 (multi-core score of 1,723) and PassMark Floating Point Math (39,362) indicates it can handle basic 3D rendering tasks, but render times will be longer than on systems with more powerful desktop CPUs. The Radeon 860M's 8 ray tracing cores also allow for hardware-accelerated ray tracing, though at a modest performance level.
Software Development: The processor's strong single-threaded performance and support for up to 89.6 GB/s of memory bandwidth make it excellent for code compilation and running virtual machines. The PassMark Extended Instructions score of 15,826 shows it can handle modern, optimized codebases efficiently.
Student and Office Work: For general productivity, web browsing, and document creation, this platform is vastly overqualified. The high single-thread score ensures a fluid user experience, and the 28W TDP means long battery life is achievable in a suitably designed laptop.

FAQ

Q: How does the AMD Ryzen AI 7 445 compare to the Intel Core i7-1370P?

A: The two processors are essentially tied in average benchmark scores. The Ryzen AI 7 445 has an average score of 26,936, which is 0.1% higher than the Core i7-1370P's score of 26,900.

Q: Is the Radeon 860M integrated GPU capable of gaming?

A: Yes, the benchmark data suggests it is quite capable for an iGPU. Its average benchmark score of 26,401 is only 0.1% behind the dedicated NVIDIA GeForce MX550, indicating it can handle many modern games at 1080p with adjusted settings.

Q: What is the performance difference between the Ryzen AI 7 445 and the AMD Ryzen 7 5700G?

A: The Ryzen AI 7 445 is slightly faster. Its average benchmark score of 26,936 is 0.4% higher than the Ryzen 7 5700G's score of 27,051.

Q: Does the system support ECC memory?

A: Yes, the CPU specification includes ECC memory support, a feature that adds a level of data integrity useful for professional and workstation tasks.

Q: What is the total power draw of the CPU and GPU?

A: The CPU has a TDP of 28W and the GPU has a TDP of 15W, for a combined thermal design power of 43W for the core processing components.

Q: Is the Radeon 860M's performance close to that of the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5060?

A: In the Geekbench benchmark suite, the scores are close, with the Radeon 860M at 26,401 and the RTX 5060 at 26,331, a 0.3% difference. However, this is a single benchmark metric and does not necessarily represent real-world gaming equivalence across all titles.

Q: What is the memory bandwidth available to the system?

A: The platform supports dual-channel DDR5 or LPDDR5X memory, providing a maximum memory bandwidth of 89.6 GB/s. This is a crucial factor for the performance of the integrated Radeon 860M GPU, which shares this system memory.

Gaming Performance

No measured FPS data exists for this exact CPU and GPU combination in the provided fact pack. The following FPS expectations are estimates derived from the benchmark scores and relative performance of the components.

The Radeon 860M's average benchmark score of 26,401 places it in the 72nd percentile of all GPUs and on par with the NVIDIA GeForce MX550. Based on this positioning, the integrated GPU is expected to deliver playable frame rates at 1080p resolution in a wide variety of games, particularly when graphical settings are set to medium or high. For esports titles like Counter-Strike 2 or Valorant, the GPU's strong compute performance and the CPU's high single-thread score of 3,591 suggest that frame rates well above 60 FPS are achievable, potentially even exceeding 100 FPS at lower settings.

For more demanding AAA titles released in recent years, the estimate is that the Radeon 860M will deliver between 30 and 60 FPS at 1080p with a mix of medium and high settings, depending on the specific game's optimization. The CPU's Cinebench R23 multi-core score of 10,590 is sufficient to avoid being a significant bottleneck at these frame rates. At higher resolutions like 1440p, the GPU's memory bandwidth, which is system-dependent, will become a limiting factor, and users should expect to lower settings to maintain smooth performance. The overall picture is that this platform provides a surprisingly capable gaming experience for an integrated solution, making it suitable for casual and even some competitive gaming on the go, but it is not a replacement for a high-end discrete GPU for 4K or ultra-high refresh rate gaming.

Rate My PC: AMD Ryzen AI 7 445 + AMD Radeon 860M

Apex Performer

System Balance Analysis

AMD Ryzen AI 7 445

AMD Radeon 860M

Market Position

Game Performance Benchmarks

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

Performance Insights

Optimal Performance

4K Gaming Ready

Performance Tiers Explained

Ultimate

High-End

Mid-Range

Entry Level

Legacy

CPU Analysis

Benchmark Performance

GPU Analysis

Upgrade Path and Platform

Balance and Bottleneck

Who Should Build It

Usage Scenarios

FAQ

Gaming Performance

4K Gaming Performance

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

1440p Gaming Performance

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

1080p Gaming Performance

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

Related Processors

Related Graphics Cards

Compare Your CPU

Compare Your GPU

Related PC Builds

Same CPU with Different GPUs

Same GPU with Different CPUs

Other Popular Builds