SYSTEM ANALYZER

Rate My PC: AMD Ryzen AI 7 445 + AMD Radeon 8050S

Get a comprehensive performance analysis of your gaming rig with detailed benchmarks, bottleneck detection, and upgrade recommendations

92 / 100
ULTIMATE READY

Apex Performer

Top 8% of systems. Capable of 4K Ultra gaming and advanced rendering.

4K 60+ FPSVR ReadyRay Tracing

System Balance Analysis

CPU vs GPU performance ratio
Well Balanced
CPU
87%
VS
GPU
97%
PROCESSOR

AMD Ryzen AI 7 445

26,936 Benchmark Score
Top 13% Market Ranking
View Full Specs →
GRAPHICS CARD

AMD Radeon 8050S

62,108 Benchmark Score
Top 3% Market Ranking
View Full Specs →

Market Position

How your build compares to others
Budget
0-30
Mid-Range
30-60
High-End
60-85
Enthusiast
85-100
Your Build

Game Performance Benchmarks

Real-world 4K FPS in popular titles
View All Games →

Performance Insights

Tips to maximize your system

Optimal Performance

Your system is in the top tier. You can run any modern game at maximum settings.

4K Gaming Ready

Consider a 4K 144Hz monitor to fully utilize your hardware capabilities.

Compatible Games See what you can play Compare CPUs Find upgrades Compare GPUs Find upgrades

Performance Tiers Explained

90-100

Ultimate

4K Ultra gaming, VR ready, ray tracing enabled, professional workloads

4K 60+ FPS VR Ready
70-89

High-End

1440p Ultra or 4K High settings, excellent for modern AAA titles

1440p Ultra 4K High
50-69

Mid-Range

1080p Ultra or 1440p Medium, great value for most gamers

1080p Ultra 1440p Med
30-49

Entry Level

1080p Medium settings, suitable for eSports and older titles

1080p Med eSports
0-29

Legacy

Basic gaming, older titles, consider upgrading for modern games

720p-1080p Low Older Games

The AMD Ryzen AI 7 445 and AMD Radeon 8050S form a laptop-class pairing that lands in the 84th combined percentile, placing it above most current systems. The CPU is a 6-core Zen 5 part with a 79th percentile ranking, while the GPU, based on RDNA 3.5, reaches the 89th percentile among all GPUs. This combination produces a balanced mobile platform that excels in both compute-heavy workloads and high-resolution gaming, though its strengths and limitations are clearly delineated by the specific benchmark data.

FAQ

Q: What is the combined performance percentile of this CPU and GPU pairing?

A: The pairing achieves an 84th combined percentile, indicating it outperforms roughly 84% of all tested system configurations in the database.

Q: How does the CPU compare to the Intel Core i7-1370P?

A: The Ryzen AI 7 445 scores an average of 26936, which is 0.1% higher than the Intel Core i7-1370P's average score of 26900. This effectively places them in a statistical tie.

Q: What is the GPU's performance relative to the AMD Radeon RX 7600M?

A: The Radeon 8050S has an average benchmark score of 62108, which is 2.6% lower than the Radeon RX 7600M's average score of 63775. It also trails the Radeon Pro Vega 56 by 2.5%.

Q: What are the CPU's clock speeds and core configuration?

A: The CPU features 6 cores and 12 threads, with a base clock of 2.00 GHz and a boost clock of 4.60 GHz. It is built on the Zen 5 architecture using a 4 nm process node.

Q: What is the GPU's memory configuration?

A: The GPU uses System Shared memory, meaning its VRAM size, type, and bus width are all dependent on the system's main memory. Its bandwidth is also described as System Dependent.

Q: What is the CPU's single-thread performance score?

A: In Cinebench R23, the CPU scores 1806 points in single-core tests. It also achieves a Passmark single-thread score of 3591.

Q: Does the GPU support hardware ray tracing?

A: Yes, the GPU includes 32 dedicated ray tracing cores and supports DirectX 12 Ultimate (12_2), Vulkan 1.4, and OpenGL 4.6.

Benchmark Performance

The combined benchmark picture shows a system that is stronger on the graphics side than on the processor side. The GPU's 89th percentile ranking is a full ten points higher than the CPU's 79th percentile, indicating that the Radeon 8050S is the more dominant component in this pairing. The GPU's average benchmark score of 62108 is derived from a Geekbench OpenCL score of 65818 and a Vulkan score of 58398. This places it just 0.3% ahead of the AMD Radeon Pro W6600M, making it a direct competitor to professional mobile workstation GPUs. Its nearest rivals also include the Radeon Pro Vega 56 and RX 7600M, from which it trails by 2.5% and 2.6% respectively.

On the CPU side, the Ryzen AI 7 445's average benchmark score of 26936 positions it in the upper-middle tier of all processors. It is 0.1% ahead of the Intel Core i7-1370P and 0.3% ahead of the AMD Ryzen 5 7545U, while being 0.4% behind the AMD Ryzen 7 5700G and 0.6% behind the Intel Core i9-9900K. This cluster of rivals, all within a 0.6% delta, shows that the CPU delivers performance comparable to previous-generation desktop flagship processors and current mid-range mobile parts.

The overall system percentile of 84 reflects the synergy between these two components. The GPU's strong showing in compute benchmarks compensates for the CPU's more modest results, resulting in a system that is well-suited for graphically intensive tasks. The data shows a clear division: the CPU handles everyday processing and productivity with competence, while the GPU boosts the system's capabilities in rendering, gaming, and other parallel workloads.

CPU Analysis

The AMD Ryzen AI 7 445 is a 6-core, 12-thread processor based on the Zen 5 architecture, manufactured on TSMC's 4 nm process. It belongs to the Ryzen AI 400 generation (codenamed Gorgon Point) and operates within a 28 W TDP, indicating a focus on power efficiency for mobile use. The base clock of 2.00 GHz and boost clock of 4.60 GHz provide a wide dynamic range, allowing the chip to scale from low-power idle states to demanding single-threaded tasks.

In multi-threaded workloads, the CPU achieves a Cinebench R23 score of 10590 and a Cinebench R15 score of 1723. These numbers are competitive with the Intel Core i7-1370P, which the CPU edges out by 0.1% in average score. The Passmark multithread score of 18115 reinforces this positioning, showing that the 6-core configuration with simultaneous multithreading is sufficient for mainstream productivity tasks but does not challenge higher-core-count parts. The L3 cache is limited to 4 MB, which is modest, but the per-core L1 and L2 caches of 80 KB and 1 MB respectively help mitigate latency.

Single-thread performance is a notable strength, with a Cinebench R23 single-core score of 1806 and a Passmark single-thread score of 3591. The high 4.60 GHz boost clock and efficient Zen 5 architecture ensure snappy responsiveness in everyday applications. In Passmark sub-tests, the CPU shows particular aptitude in integer math (58332) and floating-point math (39362), while its data compression score of 215812 is exceptionally high. The data encryption score of 10519 and extended instructions score of 15826 indicate robust support for cryptographic and vectorized workloads.

The memory controller supports DDR5 and LPDDR5X in a dual-channel configuration, with a peak bandwidth of 89.6 GB/s. ECC memory support is included, a feature typically found in workstation-class hardware. The CPU provides PCIe Gen 4 with 14 lanes, which is adequate for the integrated GPU and a single high-speed NVMe drive. The integrated Radeon 840M graphics offer a fallback for basic display output, though the discrete-class Radeon 8050S handles the heavy lifting.

Usage Scenarios

High-refresh gaming: The GPU's 89th percentile ranking and 11.47 TFLOPS of FP32 performance suggest the system is capable of driving high frame rates at 1080p and potentially 1440p in less demanding titles. The CPU's single-thread score of 1806 in Cinebench R23 ensures that the processor will not bottleneck the GPU in most gaming scenarios, although the 6-core configuration may limit performance in heavily threaded titles. Users can expect smooth gameplay at high refresh rates in esports and mainstream AAA games.

Streaming: The CPU's 12 threads and strong Passmark multithread score of 18115 provide adequate headroom for encoding a stream while gaming. The GPU's support for DirectX 12 Ultimate and its compute capabilities can offload some streaming tasks, though the lack of dedicated tensor cores means AI-based encoding features are absent. The 28 W CPU TDP and 55 W GPU TDP together indicate a power-efficient platform that can sustain long streaming sessions without excessive thermal load.

Video editing: The GPU's 89th percentile ranking and 64 ROPs deliver strong performance in GPU-accelerated effects and rendering. The CPU's multi-core score of 10590 in Cinebench R23 is sufficient for timeline editing and export tasks, though it will not match higher-core-count desktop processors. The 89.6 GB/s memory bandwidth is a limiting factor for large 4K timelines, but the system is capable of handling 1080p and moderate 4K projects with ease.

3D rendering: The GPU's 32 ray tracing cores and 11.47 TFLOPS of FP32 performance make it a capable entry-level renderer for applications that utilize GPU acceleration. The CPU's floating-point math score of 39362 and integer math score of 58332 support CPU-based rendering, though the 6-core limit means longer render times compared to 8-core or 16-core parts. The system is well-suited for preview renders and iterative work rather than final-frame production.

Software development: The CPU's strong single-thread performance (3591 Passmark) ensures fast compilation of single-file projects and responsive IDE interactions. The 12 threads handle parallel builds reasonably well, while the 4 MB L3 cache may cause some performance dips in large codebases. The ECC memory support is a valuable feature for developers working on long-running servers or data integrity-critical applications.

Student and office work: The 28 W TDP makes this an efficient platform for all-day battery life in a laptop form factor. The CPU's Passmark single-thread score of 3591 and data compression score of 215812 indicate smooth performance in document processing, spreadsheet calculations, and web browsing. The integrated Radeon 840M provides a power-saving fallback for light tasks, while the Radeon 8050S remains available for more demanding visual workloads.

Gaming Performance

No measured FPS rows exist for this exact CPU and GPU combination; the FACT PACK contains no measuredFps data. All frame rate figures below are estimates derived from the GPU's benchmark scores and its position relative to known rivals. The Radeon 8050S's 89th percentile ranking and 11.47 TFLOPS of FP32 performance place it in the upper tier of mobile GPUs. Its nearest rival, the Radeon Pro W6600M, is a professional workstation part, while the RX 7600M, which it trails by 2.6%, is a mainstream gaming GPU.

Based on the GPU's Geekbench OpenCL score of 65818 and Vulkan score of 58398, the system should deliver high frame rates at 1080p in most modern games. At 1080p ultra settings, the GPU is expected to achieve 60+ FPS in esports titles and competitive frame rates in AAA games. At 1440p, the 64 ROPs and 358.4 GTexel/s texture rate suggest playable frame rates in less demanding titles, but the System Shared memory bandwidth presents a potential bottleneck. At 4K, the GPU's 11.47 TFLOPS is insufficient for consistent 60 FPS in graphically intensive titles, and users should expect to lower settings.

The CPU's single-core score of 1806 in Cinebench R23 ensures that processor-bound scenarios will not significantly hamper gaming performance. However, in CPU-intensive titles that utilize more than 6 cores, the Ryzen AI 7 445 may become a limiting factor. The 4 MB L3 cache is relatively small, which could impact performance in open-world games with large streaming budgets. Overall, this system is best suited for 1080p high-refresh gaming and 1440p medium-to-high settings.

Who Should Build It

The target audience for this system includes gamers seeking a high-performance laptop capable of 1080p high-refresh gaming and moderate 1440p gameplay. The GPU's 89th percentile ranking and CPU's 79th percentile ensure a smooth experience in most titles without the need for a desktop replacement. Content creators working with 1080p or 1440p video will benefit from the GPU's compute capabilities and the CPU's balanced multi-threaded performance.

Software developers who value ECC memory support and strong single-thread performance will find this platform attractive for building and testing applications. The 12 threads handle compilation tasks efficiently, while the power-efficient 28 W CPU TDP enables long coding sessions on battery power. Students and professionals in office environments will appreciate the combination of performance and efficiency, with the integrated Radeon 840M providing a low-power option for basic tasks.

Small business workstations that require GPU acceleration for CAD or data visualization will find the Radeon 8050S's ray tracing cores and 89th percentile ranking sufficient for entry-level professional tasks. The system's 84th combined percentile places it above most competing laptops, making it a versatile choice for users who need both CPU and GPU performance without sacrificing portability.

Balance and Bottleneck

The data indicates that the GPU is the stronger component in this pairing, with an 89th percentile ranking versus the CPU's 79th percentile. In gaming workloads, the CPU's 6-core configuration and 4 MB L3 cache are the primary limiting factors. Games that scale beyond 6 threads will see diminishing returns, and the small cache may cause stuttering in titles with large asset streaming demands. The GPU's performance headroom means that frame rates will be constrained by the CPU in these scenarios.

In compute-heavy workloads such as 3D rendering, the GPU's 32 ray tracing cores and 11.47 TFLOPS provide substantial acceleration, but the CPU's 10590 Cinebench R23 score will bottleneck tasks that require sequential processing or heavy scene graph traversal. The 89.6 GB/s memory bandwidth is a shared resource, and both the CPU and GPU compete for this bandwidth, potentially causing contention in mixed workloads.

The 28 W CPU TDP and 55 W GPU TDP together create a thermal and power envelope of approximately 83 W, which is manageable in a laptop chassis. The GPU's System Shared memory configuration means that increasing system memory capacity will directly benefit GPU performance by providing more VRAM and bandwidth. Conversely, running with minimal system memory will degrade GPU performance, making the memory configuration a critical balance point.

Build Overview

This build pairs the AMD Ryzen AI 7 445, a 6-core Zen 5 mobile processor, with the AMD Radeon 8050S, an RDNA 3.5 based integrated GPU from the Navi Mobile generation. The system is classified as a laptop build, and its 84th combined percentile places it in the upper tier of all tested configurations. The CPU's 79th percentile and GPU's 89th percentile together indicate a well-rounded platform that excels in graphics-intensive tasks while maintaining competent CPU performance.

The CPU's average benchmark score of 26936 is competitive with desktop processors like the Intel Core i9-9900K and AMD Ryzen 7 5700G, from which it trails by 0.6% and 0.4% respectively. The GPU's average score of 62108 is within 2.7% of the AMD Radeon RX 9060 XT LP, showing that it performs near the level of a low-profile desktop GPU. This pairing offers laptop users performance that rivals entry-level desktop systems from previous generations.

Upgrade Path and Platform

The CPU uses the AMD Socket FP8, which is a mobile-specific socket with no upgrade path to higher-core-count desktop parts. The platform supports DDR5 and LPDDR5X memory in a dual-channel configuration, with ECC memory support available. The CPU provides PCIe Gen 4 with 14 lanes, while the GPU uses a PCIe 5.0 x16 interface, ensuring the graphics subsystem has ample bandwidth for future GPU upgrades if the laptop chassis permits.

The system's 28 W CPU TDP and 55 W GPU TDP suggest that the power delivery is designed for a combined load of approximately 83 W. The suggested PSU is not specified, but in a laptop context, the power adapter must supply sufficient headroom for both components under full load. The GPU's power connectors are listed as "None," confirming its integrated nature. A sensible next upgrade would be to increase system memory capacity, as the GPU's performance is directly tied to available system memory bandwidth and capacity. Moving to a larger LPDDR5X configuration would provide the GPU with more VRAM and reduce potential bottlenecks in high-resolution gaming or large dataset processing.

GPU Analysis

The AMD Radeon 8050S is based on the Strix Halo chip and uses the RDNA 3.5 architecture, manufactured on TSMC's 4 nm process. It features 2048 shading units, 128 texture mapping units, and 64 render output units, operating at a base clock of 1295 MHz and a boost clock of 2800 MHz. The GPU includes 32 ray tracing cores, enabling hardware-accelerated ray tracing in supported titles. Its FP32 performance is rated at 11.47 TFLOPS, with FP16 performance also at 11.47 TFLOPS, indicating a 1:1 ratio for these compute types.

Memory is configured as System Shared, meaning the GPU relies on the host system's DDR5 or LPDDR5X memory. This architecture eliminates dedicated VRAM but makes performance dependent on system memory speed and capacity. The bus width is also System Shared, and the bandwidth is listed as System Dependent. The GPU's pixel rate is 179.2 GPixel/s, and its texture rate is 358.4 GTexel/s, both of which are strong figures for an integrated GPU.

In benchmark testing, the GPU scores 65818 in Geekbench OpenCL and 58398 in Geekbench Vulkan, resulting in an average score of 62108. This places it in the 89th percentile of all GPUs, outperforming the Radeon Pro W6600M by 0.3% and trailing the Radeon Pro Vega 56 by 2.5%. The GPU supports DirectX 12 Ultimate (12_2), OpenGL 4.6, and Vulkan 1.4, ensuring compatibility with modern gaming and rendering APIs. Its 55 W TDP is remarkably low for the performance level delivered, making it an efficient choice for thin-and-light laptops that still require substantial graphics capability.