SYSTEM ANALYZER

Rate My PC: AMD Ryzen AI 5 PRO 435G + NVIDIA Quadro RTX 5000

Get a comprehensive performance analysis of your gaming rig with detailed benchmarks, bottleneck detection, and upgrade recommendations

92 / 100
ULTIMATE READY

Apex Performer

Top 8% of systems. Capable of 4K Ultra gaming and advanced rendering.

4K 60+ FPSVR ReadyRay Tracing

System Balance Analysis

CPU vs GPU performance ratio
Well Balanced
CPU
92%
VS
GPU
91%
PROCESSOR

AMD Ryzen AI 5 PRO 435G

40,718 Benchmark Score
Top 8% Market Ranking
View Full Specs →
GRAPHICS CARD

NVIDIA Quadro RTX 5000

21,629 Benchmark Score
Top 9% Market Ranking
View Full Specs →

Market Position

How your build compares to others
Budget
0-30
Mid-Range
30-60
High-End
60-85
Enthusiast
85-100
Your Build

Game Performance Benchmarks

Real-world 4K FPS in popular titles
View All Games →

Performance Insights

Tips to maximize your system

Optimal Performance

Your system is in the top tier. You can run any modern game at maximum settings.

4K Gaming Ready

Consider a 4K 144Hz monitor to fully utilize your hardware capabilities.

Compatible Games See what you can play Compare CPUs Find upgrades Compare GPUs Find upgrades

Performance Tiers Explained

90-100

Ultimate

4K Ultra gaming, VR ready, ray tracing enabled, professional workloads

4K 60+ FPS VR Ready
70-89

High-End

1440p Ultra or 4K High settings, excellent for modern AAA titles

1440p Ultra 4K High
50-69

Mid-Range

1080p Ultra or 1440p Medium, great value for most gamers

1080p Ultra 1440p Med
30-49

Entry Level

1080p Medium settings, suitable for eSports and older titles

1080p Med eSports
0-29

Legacy

Basic gaming, older titles, consider upgrading for modern games

720p-1080p Low Older Games

# AMD Ryzen AI 5 PRO 435G + NVIDIA Quadro RTX 5000: Desktop Workstation Analysis

This desktop pairing combines AMD's 6-core Zen 5-based Ryzen AI 5 PRO 435G with NVIDIA's Turing-architecture Quadro RTX 5000, placing the combination at the 77th percentile overall. The CPU achieves an average benchmark score of 40,718, ranking in the 87th percentile among all CPUs, while the GPU's average score of 21,629 places it in the 67th percentile among all GPUs. The data indicates a system where processing throughput outpaces graphics capability, a balance that suits professional workloads more than high-refresh gaming.

Usage Scenarios

High-refresh gaming: The Quadro RTX 5000's PassMark G3D score of 15,616 sits near the GeForce GTX 1060 6 GB (21,856, -1% delta) and RTX A4000 Mobile (21,379, +1.2% delta), indicating 1080p-class performance. The CPU's single-thread score of 3,829 supports responsive gameplay, but the GPU's age (Turing architecture, 12nm process) limits frame rates at high refresh rates. The DirectX 12 score of 59 suggests modern API titles will be demanding, making 144Hz gaming unrealistic at ultra settings.

Streaming: The Ryzen AI 5 PRO 435G's 12 threads and multi-thread score of 20,285 provide adequate headroom for encoding while gaming, though the GPU lacks dedicated NVENC hardware from newer generations. The CPU's PassMark data encryption score of 12,111 indicates solid security processing for stream authentication and DRM. The 89.6 GB/s memory bandwidth supports concurrent gaming and encoding workloads without severe contention.

Video editing: The GPU's 16 GB GDDR6 memory with 448.0 GB/s bandwidth handles 4K timelines comfortably, while the CPU's floating-point math score of 43,494 accelerates effect processing. The CPU's PassMark physics score of 999 suggests modest simulation performance, but the 12 threads and 4 MB L3 cache handle multi-track editing adequately. The GPU's OpenCL score of 78,999 enables GPU-accelerated rendering in compatible editors.

3D rendering: The Quadro RTX 5000's 11.15 TFLOPS FP32 performance and 348.5 GTexel/s texture rate provide solid viewport performance for CAD and DCC applications. The CPU's integer math score of 63,707 supports geometry processing and scene compilation. The 48 RT cores and 384 tensor cores, while dated, enable ray-traced previews and AI denoising in supported renderers. The GPU's compute score of 6,525 indicates moderate render throughput compared to modern workstation GPUs.

Software development: The CPU's PassMark extended instructions score of 18,697 accelerates SIMD-heavy compilation workloads, while the 12 threads handle parallel builds efficiently. The single-thread score of 3,829 ensures responsive IDE interaction. The 4 MB L3 cache and 89.6 GB/s memory bandwidth reduce compilation bottlenecks. The GPU's 16 GB VRAM allows local model inference and GPU-accelerated testing.

Student and office work: The CPU's 87th percentile ranking and 40,718 average score handle productivity suites, spreadsheets, and research workloads with ease. The Radeon 840M integrated graphics provide a fallback for basic display tasks, while the Quadro RTX 5000 accelerates visualization in scientific and engineering coursework. The 65W CPU TDP and 230W GPU TDP keep power requirements moderate for dorm-room builds.

Balance and Bottleneck

The data reveals a CPU-forward system. The CPU's 87th percentile rank versus the GPU's 67th percentile means the processor can feed the graphics card faster than the card can render in most scenarios. In gaming workloads, the GPU becomes the limiting factor, as its G3D score of 15,616 trails the CPU's capability to drive high frame rates. The GPU's DirectX 12 score of 59 versus DirectX 11's 140 indicates severe performance degradation in modern APIs, creating a bottleneck that the CPU cannot overcome.

For compute workloads, the balance shifts. The GPU's 6,525 compute score and 11.15 TFLOPS FP32 throughput outpace the CPU's 43,494 floating-point math score for parallel operations. The CPU's 12 threads and 20,285 multi-thread score handle serial tasks efficiently, while the GPU accelerates bulk parallel work. The 89.6 GB/s CPU memory bandwidth versus 448.0 GB/s GPU bandwidth shows the GPU is better suited for large dataset manipulation.

The 230W GPU TDP against the 65W CPU TDP indicates the graphics card dominates power draw, yet its performance rank is lower. This creates an efficiency mismatch where the CPU delivers higher relative performance per watt. The combined 77th percentile suggests the system's overall capability is limited more by the GPU than the CPU, particularly in graphics-intensive applications.

Benchmark Performance

The CPU's average benchmark score of 40,718 places it just 0.2% ahead of the Intel Xeon 6357P (40,630), 0.3% ahead of the Intel Core 5 223PE (40,585), 0.4% ahead of the Intel Core 7 253PE (40,557), and 0.5% ahead of the Intel Core Ultra X7 368H (40,518). This clustering indicates the Ryzen AI 5 PRO 435G sits at the top of a tightly-packed performance tier, where rival processors differ by less than a single percentage point. The CPU's 87th percentile ranking confirms it outperforms the vast majority of installed processors.

The GPU's average benchmark score of 21,629 places it 1% below the GeForce GTX 1060 6 GB (21,856), 1.2% above the RTX A4000 Mobile (21,379), 1.8% above the Radeon HD 8970M (21,237), and 2.3% above the Radeon RX Vega M GL (21,153). The Quadro RTX 5000 sits in a competitive mid-range segment, with its nearest rivals spanning from a 2016 consumer card to a mobile workstation GPU. The 67th percentile ranking shows it outperforms two-thirds of all GPUs but falls short of high-end modern parts.

The combined picture shows a system at the 77th percentile, where the CPU's strong performance boosts the overall ranking despite the GPU's more modest position. The PassMark GPU compute score of 6,525 and DirectX 11 score of 140 indicate the GPU handles legacy workloads better than modern ones, while the CPU's consistent scores across integer math (63,707), floating-point math (43,494), and data compression (253,484) demonstrate balanced processing capability.

FAQ

Q: Is this system suitable for 4K gaming?

A: No. The GPU's G3D score of 15,616 and DirectX 12 score of 59 indicate it cannot maintain playable frame rates at 4K ultra settings. The card's performance aligns with 1080p-class gaming, as evidenced by its similarity to the GeForce GTX 1060 6 GB (21,856, -1% delta).

Q: How does the CPU compare to Intel alternatives?

A: The Ryzen AI 5 PRO 435G's average score of 40,718 is 0.2% ahead of the Intel Xeon 6357P, 0.3% ahead of the Core 5 223PE, 0.4% ahead of the Core 7 253PE, and 0.5% ahead of the Core Ultra X7 368H. All four processors perform within a 0.5% margin.

Q: Can this GPU handle machine learning workloads?

A: The Quadro RTX 5000 includes 384 tensor cores and 48 RT cores, and its 16 GB VRAM with 448.0 GB/s bandwidth supports model inference. Its compute score of 6,525 and FP16 performance of 22.30 TFLOPS (2:1) enable moderate AI workloads, though modern GPUs offer higher throughput.

Q: What memory does this CPU support?

A: The Ryzen AI 5 PRO 435G supports DDR5 memory in dual-channel configuration with 89.6 GB/s bandwidth. It also supports ECC memory, making it suitable for workstation builds requiring error correction.

Q: Is the GPU still in production?

A: No. The Quadro RTX 5000 is marked as end-of-life with a release date of 2018-08-12. Its successor is listed as Workstation Ampere, and its predecessor is Quadro Volta.

Q: What is the CPU's integrated graphics capability?

A: The Ryzen AI 5 PRO 435G includes Radeon 840M integrated graphics. This provides basic display output and fallback functionality, though the discrete Quadro RTX 5000 is the primary graphics solution.

Q: How does the GPU compare to the GTX 1060?

A: The Quadro RTX 5000 scores 21,629 average versus the GTX 1060 6 GB's 21,856, a 1% deficit. Both deliver similar overall performance, though the Quadro offers 16 GB VRAM versus 6 GB and supports RT cores and tensor cores.

Gaming Performance

No measured FPS rows exist for this exact CPU+GPU combination. The FACT PACK contains no measuredFps data for any game or resolution. All FPS figures below are estimates derived from the benchmark scores and should be treated as approximations, not measured results.

Based on the GPU's G3D score of 15,616 and DirectX 11 score of 140, the system can be expected to handle esports titles at 1080p with high settings, likely exceeding 60 FPS in games optimized for older APIs. The DirectX 12 score of 59 indicates modern titles using DX12 will see significantly lower performance, possibly dropping below 60 FPS at 1080p ultra settings. The DirectX 9 score of 195 suggests legacy titles run well, while the DirectX 10 score of 113 indicates moderate performance in older games.

At 1440p, the GPU's 16 GB VRAM prevents memory-related stuttering, but the 11.15 TFLOPS FP32 throughput limits pixel throughput. The 116.2 GPixel/s pixel rate and 348.5 GTexel/s texture rate suggest 1440p gaming at medium settings is achievable in less demanding titles. The GPU's similarity to the GeForce GTX 1060 6 GB (21,856, -1% delta) reinforces the expectation of 1080p-class gaming performance. The RTX A4000 Mobile comparison (21,379, +1.2% delta) further confirms this tier.

The CPU's single-thread score of 3,829 ensures no CPU bottleneck at 1080p in most games, while the 12 threads and 20,285 multi-thread score handle background tasks during gameplay. The 89.6 GB/s memory bandwidth prevents bandwidth starvation, though the GPU's 448.0 GB/s bandwidth is the more critical factor for texture streaming.

GPU Analysis

The NVIDIA Quadro RTX 5000 is built on the TU104 chip using TSMC's 12nm process with 13,600 million transistors on a 545 mm² die, yielding a transistor density of 25.0M per mm². The GPU operates at a base clock of 1620 MHz and boost clock of 1815 MHz, with memory clocked at 1750 MHz (14 Gbps effective). Its 16 GB GDDR6 memory on a 256-bit bus provides 448.0 GB/s bandwidth, which is substantial for its era but modest by current standards.

The 3072 shading units, 192 TMUs, and 64 ROPs deliver 11.15 TFLOPS FP32 and 22.30 TFLOPS FP16 (2:1 ratio). The 48 RT cores and 384 tensor cores provide ray tracing and AI acceleration, though the Turing architecture's RT implementation is less efficient than later generations. The pixel rate of 116.2 GPixel/s and texture rate of 348.5 GTexel/s define its fill-rate capabilities.

Benchmark results show a GPU that peaks in legacy workloads: DirectX 9 scores 195, DirectX 10 scores 113, DirectX 11 scores 140, and DirectX 12 scores 59. The G2D score of 709 indicates strong 2D performance, while the G3D score of 15,616 and compute score of 6,525 place it in the mid-range tier. The OpenCL score of 78,999 and Vulkan score of 92,309 show better cross-platform API performance than DirectX 12.

The 230W TDP, dual-slot design, and 1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin power connectors require a 550W suggested PSU. The PCIe 3.0 x16 interface, while older, does not bottleneck the GPU's performance given its bandwidth requirements. Display outputs include 4x DisplayPort 1.4a and 1x USB Type-C, supporting multi-monitor workstation setups.

CPU Analysis

The AMD Ryzen AI 5 PRO 435G features 6 cores and 12 threads based on the Gorgon Point codename, part of the Ryzen AI PRO 400 generation using Zen 5 / Zen 5c architecture. Manufactured on TSMC's 4nm process, it runs at a base clock of 2.00 GHz and boost clock of 4.50 GHz. The cache hierarchy includes 80 KB L1 per core, 1 MB L2 per core, and 4 MB L3 total.

Benchmark scores reveal a strong single-thread performer at 3,829, which is critical for everyday responsiveness and lightly-threaded applications. The multi-thread score of 20,285 demonstrates solid scaling across 12 threads, while the integer math score of 63,707 and floating-point math score of 43,494 show balanced arithmetic capability. The data compression score of 253,484 is exceptionally high, indicating strong memory subsystem performance for compressed workloads.

The data encryption score of 11,211 and extended instructions score of 18,697 support security-sensitive and SIMD-heavy applications. The find prime numbers score of 55 and random string sorting score of 27,407 are more modest, reflecting the CPU's design priorities. The physics score of 999 is surprisingly low, suggesting limited gaming physics performance despite the overall strong scores.

The CPU's 87th percentile ranking and average score of 40,718 place it among the top processors available. Its nearest rivals, the Intel Xeon 6357P (40,630, +0.2%), Core 5 223PE (40,585, +0.3%), Core 7 253PE (40,557, +0.4%), and Core Ultra X7 368H (40,518, +0.5%), all score within a narrow band, indicating the Ryzen AI 5 PRO 435G leads its competitive tier by a negligible margin.

Build Overview

This desktop build combines AMD's Ryzen AI 5 PRO 435G with NVIDIA's Quadro RTX 5000, creating a workstation-oriented system at the 77th combined percentile. The CPU's 87th percentile ranking provides top-tier processing power, while the GPU's 67th percentile positions it as a mid-range graphics solution. The pairing is classed as a desktop build, suitable for stationary professional use.

The system's overall tier is defined by the significant gap between CPU and GPU performance. The CPU outperforms 87% of all processors, while the GPU outperforms 67% of all GPUs, making this a CPU-strong configuration. The 16 GB GPU memory and 12-thread CPU provide solid foundations for professional workloads, though the GPU's Turing architecture and 12nm process node limit its modern gaming and compute capabilities.

The Quadro RTX 5000's status as an end-of-life product with a 2018-08-12 release date means this build leverages older graphics technology paired with a current-generation CPU. The Radeon 840M integrated graphics in the CPU provide a backup display solution, which is useful for troubleshooting or low-power tasks. The build's 65W CPU TDP and 230W GPU TDP total 295W, well within the 550W suggested PSU rating.

Who Should Build It

1080p gamers: The GPU's performance near the GeForce GTX 1060 6 GB (21,856, -1% delta) indicates playable 1080p gaming at medium-to-high settings in older titles, though DirectX 12 games will struggle given the score of 59. Gamers prioritizing esports or legacy titles will find adequate performance, but those seeking modern AAA experiences at high refresh rates should look elsewhere.

Content creators: Video editors and 3D artists benefit from the CPU's 12 threads and 20,285 multi-thread score, plus the GPU's 16 GB VRAM with 448.0 GB/s bandwidth for large project files. The OpenCL score of 78,999 supports GPU-accelerated effects in Adobe and DaVinci Resolve workflows. The CPU's data compression score of 253,484 accelerates archive-heavy asset pipelines.

Software developers: The CPU's 87th percentile ranking and single-thread score of 3,829 provide fast compilation and responsive IDE performance. The 4 MB L3 cache and 89.6 GB/s memory bandwidth reduce build times. The GPU's 384 tensor cores enable local AI model development, while the 16 GB VRAM supports large model inference.

Students and researchers: The system's 77th combined percentile handles coursework, simulation, and data analysis. The CPU's extended instructions score of 18,697 accelerates scientific computing, while ECC memory support ensures data integrity for research workloads. The GPU's 48 RT cores enable visualization projects in engineering and architecture programs.

Small business workstations: The CPU's 65W TDP and GPU's 230W TDP make this a manageable power draw for office environments. The Quadro RTX 5000's 4x DisplayPort 1.4a and USB Type-C outputs support multi-monitor productivity setups. The CPU's production status as Active ensures ongoing availability and driver support.

Upgrade Path and Platform

The CPU uses AMD Socket AM5, providing a current-generation platform with DDR5 memory support in dual-channel configuration. The 89.6 GB/s memory bandwidth and ECC support make this a robust foundation for workstation use. The CPU provides Gen 4 PCIe with 10 lanes, while the GPU uses PCIe 3.0 x16, meaning the graphics card does not fully utilize the CPU's newer PCIe generation but remains compatible.

The GPU's 230W TDP and suggested 550W PSU leave headroom for additional components. The 1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin power connectors are standard for this class of card. The 267mm length and 111mm height fit most mid-tower cases, and the dual-slot design is conventional.

A sensible next upgrade would be replacing the end-of-life Quadro RTX 5000 with a modern workstation GPU, as the CPU's 87th percentile ranking provides ample headroom for a more powerful graphics card. The AM5 socket supports future AMD processors, allowing CPU upgrades without changing the motherboard. The 65W TDP gives thermal and power headroom for higher-TDP processors if needed. The 4 MB L3 cache and 12 threads may become a bottleneck for heavily-threaded workloads, suggesting a future CPU upgrade to more cores would benefit compute-intensive tasks. The platform's DDR5 support and ECC capability ensure long-term relevance for professional applications.