SYSTEM ANALYZER

Rate My PC: AMD Ryzen AI 5 440G + NVIDIA Quadro RTX 5000

Get a comprehensive performance analysis of your gaming rig with detailed benchmarks, bottleneck detection, and upgrade recommendations

92 / 100
ULTIMATE READY

Apex Performer

Top 8% of systems. Capable of 4K Ultra gaming and advanced rendering.

4K 60+ FPSVR ReadyRay Tracing

System Balance Analysis

CPU vs GPU performance ratio
Well Balanced
CPU
93%
VS
GPU
91%
PROCESSOR

AMD Ryzen AI 5 440G

46,187 Benchmark Score
Top 7% Market Ranking
View Full Specs →
GRAPHICS CARD

NVIDIA Quadro RTX 5000

21,629 Benchmark Score
Top 9% Market Ranking
View Full Specs →

Market Position

How your build compares to others
Budget
0-30
Mid-Range
30-60
High-End
60-85
Enthusiast
85-100
Your Build

Game Performance Benchmarks

Real-world 4K FPS in popular titles
View All Games →

Performance Insights

Tips to maximize your system

Optimal Performance

Your system is in the top tier. You can run any modern game at maximum settings.

4K Gaming Ready

Consider a 4K 144Hz monitor to fully utilize your hardware capabilities.

Compatible Games See what you can play Compare CPUs Find upgrades Compare GPUs Find upgrades

Performance Tiers Explained

90-100

Ultimate

4K Ultra gaming, VR ready, ray tracing enabled, professional workloads

4K 60+ FPS VR Ready
70-89

High-End

1440p Ultra or 4K High settings, excellent for modern AAA titles

1440p Ultra 4K High
50-69

Mid-Range

1080p Ultra or 1440p Medium, great value for most gamers

1080p Ultra 1440p Med
30-49

Entry Level

1080p Medium settings, suitable for eSports and older titles

1080p Med eSports
0-29

Legacy

Basic gaming, older titles, consider upgrading for modern games

720p-1080p Low Older Games

The AMD Ryzen AI 5 440G is a 6-core desktop processor built on the Gorgon Point architecture, pairing Zen 5 and Zen 5c cores on a 4 nm TSMC process. It operates at a 65 W TDP with a base clock of 2.00 GHz and a boost clock of 4.80 GHz. The NVIDIA Quadro RTX 5000 is a 16 GB GDDR6 workstation GPU based on the older Turing architecture, manufactured on a 12 nm process with a 230 W TDP. Together, this desktop pairing combines a modern, efficient CPU with a professional-grade GPU that has been end-of-life since its 2018 release, creating an interesting blend of current-generation processing power and legacy workstation graphics capability.

CPU Analysis

The AMD Ryzen AI 5 440G presents a 6-core, 12-thread configuration that relies on a hybrid design mixing Zen 5 and Zen 5c cores. The base clock of 2.00 GHz is modest, but the boost clock reaches 4.80 GHz, indicating strong single-thread headroom when workloads demand it. The cache hierarchy is substantial: 80 KB of L1 per core, 1 MB of L2 per core, and 8 MB of shared L3 cache. This arrangement supports the CPU’s 89th percentile ranking among all CPUs, placing it firmly in the upper tier of processors for general-purpose computing.

Benchmark results show a multithread score of 23487 and a single-thread score of 4060. The single-thread performance is particularly strong, suggesting excellent responsiveness in lightly threaded applications like everyday desktop use and many games. The multithread score, while lower in absolute terms, still places the chip competitively. Data compression scoring 292735 and integer math scoring 71251 indicate solid throughput for computational tasks. Floating-point math at 45711 and extended instructions at 20648 show balanced execution capabilities across different instruction types. The physics score of 1329 is comparatively low, which may reflect the CPU's core count rather than architectural inefficiency.

The average benchmark score of 46187 puts this processor in close competition with several notable rivals. It edges out the Intel Core i9-13900HX by 0.2%, the Intel Core Ultra 5 235 by 0.3%, the AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 375 by 0.3%, and the AMD EPYC 4364P by 0.5%. These deltas are marginal, meaning the 440G trades blows with a mobile flagship, a mid-range desktop part, a high-end APU, and a server processor, respectively. For real workloads, this translates to performance that is effectively indistinguishable from these peers in aggregate benchmarks, though specific tasks may favor one architecture over another. The 4 nm process node and 195 mm² die size suggest good power efficiency, which aligns with the 65 W TDP for a desktop part.

Memory support includes dual-channel DDR5 with a bandwidth of 89.6 GB/s and ECC capability, making this CPU suitable for data-integrity-sensitive tasks. The integrated Radeon 840M graphics provide a fallback display output, though the discrete GPU handles rendering duties.

GPU Analysis

The NVIDIA Quadro RTX 5000 is a Turing-architecture workstation GPU built on the TU104 chip with 13,600 million transistors on a 545 mm² die. It features 3072 shading units, 192 texture mapping units, and 64 raster operation units. The GPU includes 48 RT cores and 384 tensor cores, providing hardware acceleration for ray tracing and AI inference tasks, respectively. Clock speeds are set at 1620 MHz base and 1815 MHz boost, with memory running at 1750 MHz effectively delivering 14 Gbps over a 256-bit bus.

The 16 GB of GDDR6 memory offers 448.0 GB/s of bandwidth, which is substantial for workstation applications that handle large datasets. Pixel rate reaches 116.2 GPixel/s and texture rate hits 348.5 GTexel/s, indicating strong fill-rate capabilities for traditional rendering. FP32 performance is rated at 11.15 TFLOPS, with FP16 doubling to 22.30 TFLOPS via a 2:1 ratio, making it capable of accelerated mixed-precision workloads. The power draw of 230 W requires a 550 W suggested PSU and uses one 6-pin plus one 8-pin power connector.

Benchmark data shows a G3D score of 15616 and a GPU compute score of 6525, while OpenCL and Vulkan scores reach 78999 and 92309 respectively. These figures place the GPU at the 67th percentile among all GPUs, which is respectable but not top-tier. The nearest rivals highlight its positioning: the GeForce GTX 1060 6 GB scores 1% higher, the RTX A4000 Mobile is 1.2% lower, the Radeon HD 8970M is 1.8% lower, and the Radeon RX Vega M GL is 2.3% lower. This means the Quadro RTX 5000 performs very close to a mid-range gaming GPU from several generations ago, which is expected for a workstation card that prioritizes stability and professional features over raw gaming speed.

The 448.0 GB/s bandwidth and 16 GB VRAM are the standout features for rendering tasks, allowing large scenes and textures to reside in memory without swapping. The RT cores and tensor cores enable hardware-accelerated ray tracing and AI-based features like denoising, though the Turing implementation is older than current generations.

Benchmark Performance

The CPU’s average benchmark score is 46187, placing it at the 89th percentile of all CPUs. The GPU’s average benchmark score is 21629, placing it at the 67th percentile of all GPUs. This creates a significant gap in relative performance tiers, with the CPU substantially outperforming the GPU in their respective standings. The combined percentile for this pairing is 78, reflecting the overall system tier when both components are considered together.

In practical terms, the CPU is capable of feeding the GPU in most workloads without becoming a bottleneck. The single-thread score of 4060 ensures that CPU-bound tasks like game logic and physics calculations are handled efficiently. The multithread score of 23487 supports multi-tasking and parallel workloads like video encoding. However, the GPU’s lower percentile means it will be the limiting factor in graphics-intensive scenarios, particularly at higher resolutions where GPU throughput dominates.

The data shows no measured FPS rows for this exact combination, so all gaming performance figures are estimates based on the benchmark scores. The CPU’s 89th percentile suggests it can handle high-refresh gaming, while the GPU’s 67th percentile indicates it will cap frame rates in demanding titles. For a balanced system, this pairing leans toward CPU-heavy workloads where the processor’s strength is fully utilized.

Usage Scenarios

High-refresh gaming: The CPU’s strong single-thread score of 4060 supports high frame rates in esports titles, but the GPU’s 67th percentile and DirectX 12 score of 59 suggest it will struggle to maintain 144 Hz at high settings in modern games. Estimated performance points to 1080p medium settings being the sweet spot.

Streaming: The 12 threads and multithread score of 23487 provide ample headroom for encoding while gaming. The GPU’s tensor cores could assist with AI-based encoding features, though the older Turing architecture limits the latest codecs. The 89.6 GB/s memory bandwidth helps with concurrent tasks.

Video editing: The CPU’s integer math score of 71251 and data compression score of 292735 indicate strong performance in codec-heavy workflows. The GPU’s 16 GB VRAM and 448.0 GB/s bandwidth handle large timelines and effects, though its compute score of 6525 caps GPU-accelerated rendering speed.

3D rendering: The GPU’s 11.15 TFLOPS FP32 and 22.30 TFLOPS FP16 provide solid compute throughput for rendering engines that leverage CUDA. The 48 RT cores accelerate ray-traced scenes, though performance will lag behind newer GPUs. The CPU’s multithread score supports CPU-based renderers.

Software development: The 6 cores and 12 threads handle compilation and testing efficiently. The single-thread score of 4060 ensures fast build times for incremental changes. ECC memory support is a boon for long-running test suites that require data integrity.

Student and office work: The CPU’s 89th percentile ensures snappy responsiveness in productivity suites and web browsing. The integrated Radeon 840M provides a fallback if the discrete GPU is disabled, and the 65 W TDP keeps power consumption reasonable for all-day use.

FAQ

Q: What is the core and thread configuration of the AMD Ryzen AI 5 440G?

A: The CPU has 6 cores and 12 threads, using a hybrid mix of Zen 5 and Zen 5c cores on the Gorgon Point architecture.

Q: How much VRAM does the NVIDIA Quadro RTX 5000 have?

A: The GPU has 16 GB of GDDR6 memory on a 256-bit bus, providing 448.0 GB/s of bandwidth.

Q: What is the CPU’s performance ranking relative to other processors?

A: The CPU sits at the 89th percentile of all CPUs, with an average benchmark score of 46187, placing it within 0.5% of rivals like the Intel Core i9-13900HX and AMD EPYC 4364P.

Q: Does the GPU support ray tracing?

A: Yes, the Quadro RTX 5000 includes 48 RT cores and 384 tensor cores, enabling hardware-accelerated ray tracing and AI inference.

Q: What is the combined performance percentile of this CPU and GPU pairing?

A: The combined percentile is 78, reflecting the system’s overall tier where the CPU outperforms the GPU in relative standing.

Q: What memory type does the CPU support?

A: The CPU supports dual-channel DDR5 memory with a bandwidth of 89.6 GB/s and ECC capability.

Q: Is the GPU still in production?

A: No, the Quadro RTX 5000 is end-of-life, having been released in 2018, and its successor is Workstation Ampere.

Who Should Build It

This system targets users who prioritize CPU performance for professional or creative workloads but do not require the latest GPU technology. Gamers at 1080p resolution will find the CPU capable of driving high frame rates, though the GPU will limit settings in demanding titles. Content creators working in video editing or 3D rendering will benefit from the 16 GB VRAM and 448.0 GB/s bandwidth for large projects, while the CPU’s multithread score of 23487 handles encoding and simulation tasks. Software developers will appreciate the fast single-thread score of 4060 for compilation and the ECC memory support for stability. Students and small business workstations can leverage the 89th percentile CPU performance for everyday productivity, with the discrete GPU providing acceleration for graphics-heavy applications when needed.

The 65 W TDP of the CPU keeps cooling requirements modest, while the GPU’s 230 W TDP requires adequate airflow. The 550 W suggested PSU provides headroom for the entire system. The 4 nm CPU process node ensures efficiency, offsetting the older 12 nm GPU to some extent.

Upgrade Path and Platform

The CPU uses the AMD Socket AM5 platform, which supports DDR5 memory and PCIe Gen 4 with 12 CPU lanes. This socket has a track record of supporting multiple generations, though the FACT PACK does not specify future compatibility beyond the Ryzen AI 400 series. The memory bus is dual-channel, and the 89.6 GB/s bandwidth is standard for DDR5. The PCIe Gen 4 connectivity is sufficient for current GPUs and NVMe drives, though the Quadro RTX 5000 itself uses PCIe 3.0 x16, which is backward compatible.

The GPU’s power requirements of 230 W and the suggested 550 W PSU leave room for a more power-hungry GPU in the future. The 2,299 USD launch MSRP of the Quadro RTX 5000 indicates its original professional tier, but it is now end-of-life. A sensible next upgrade would be a newer GPU with higher percentile performance, as the CPU’s 89th percentile has ample headroom to support a more capable graphics card. The CPU’s unlocked multiplier allows overclocking to extract additional performance, though the 65 W TDP limits the thermal envelope.

Memory upgrades are straightforward with DDR5 support, and ECC capability is a differentiator for workstation builds. The socket AM5 platform is current, ensuring access to modern features like PCIe Gen 4 and high-speed DDR5 modules.

Build Overview

This is a desktop-class build that pairs the AMD Ryzen AI 5 440G with the NVIDIA Quadro RTX 5000. The CPU is a modern, efficient 6-core processor with a 4 nm process and hybrid Zen 5 / Zen 5c cores, while the GPU is a legacy Turing workstation card with 16 GB of VRAM. The combined percentile of 78 indicates an above-average system, though the CPU’s 89th percentile significantly exceeds the GPU’s 67th percentile, creating an imbalance in raw compute tiers.

The system is best characterized as a CPU-first workstation where the processor handles demanding logic, compilation, and multi-tasking, while the GPU provides professional features like ray tracing and large memory capacity. The 65 W CPU TDP and 230 W GPU TDP combine for a manageable overall power draw, supported by a 550 W PSU. The build class is desktop, confirming it is a stationary system rather than a laptop or mobile solution.

Balance and Bottleneck

The data shows a clear imbalance: the CPU ranks at the 89th percentile while the GPU ranks at the 67th percentile. This means the GPU is the primary bottleneck in graphics-intensive workloads, limiting frame rates and rendering throughput. For CPU-bound tasks like software compilation, data processing, and multi-tasking, the CPU will perform near the top of its class, with the GPU playing a supporting role.

In gaming, the CPU’s single-thread score of 4060 ensures it can process game logic and physics without stalling, but the GPU’s DirectX 12 score of 59 and G3D score of 15616 will cap frame rates. The estimated FPS scaling suggests that at 1080p, the GPU will be the limiting factor in modern titles, while at lower resolutions or less demanding games, the CPU’s headroom becomes more apparent. For rendering workloads, the GPU’s 11.15 TFLOPS FP32 and 16 GB VRAM are the decisive factors, and the CPU will rarely bottleneck these tasks given its multithread score of 23487.

The combined percentile of 78 reflects this imbalance, where the system performs better than the GPU alone would suggest but below what the CPU is capable of delivering. Upgrading the GPU would yield the largest performance gains in graphics-bound scenarios, while the CPU is well-positioned for future upgrades without replacement.

Gaming Performance

No measured FPS rows exist for this exact CPU and GPU combination in the FACT PACK, so all gaming performance figures are estimates derived from the benchmark scores. The CPU’s single-thread score of 4060 and 89th percentile ranking indicate it can support high-refresh gaming in CPU-light titles. The GPU’s 67th percentile and G3D score of 15616 suggest it performs similarly to a GeForce GTX 1060 6 GB, which is 1% faster, and an RTX A4000 Mobile, which is 1.2% slower.

At 1080p ultra settings, estimated frame rates in esports titles like Counter-Strike or Valorant could reach 100-144 FPS, driven by the CPU’s strong single-thread performance. In AAA titles, the GPU’s lower percentile will likely hold frame rates to 60-80 FPS at medium-to-high settings. At 1440p, the GPU’s 16 GB VRAM and 448.0 GB/s bandwidth help with texture-heavy scenes, but the 11.15 TFLOPS FP32 limits raw throughput, so estimates drop to 40-60 FPS at high settings. At 4K, the GPU’s pixel rate of 116.2 GPixel/s becomes a constraint, and estimated performance falls below 30 FPS in demanding titles, making 1080p the recommended resolution for playable frame rates. These figures are estimates and should be treated as such given the absence of measured data.