SYSTEM ANALYZER

Rate My PC: AMD Ryzen AI 5 435 + NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Mobile

Get a comprehensive performance analysis of your gaming rig with detailed benchmarks, bottleneck detection, and upgrade recommendations

Build Configuration

Select your components

PROCESSOR (CPU)

▼

GRAPHICS CARD (GPU)

▼

92 Score

Top 8% Ranking

92 / 100

ULTIMATE READY

Apex Performer

Top 8% of systems. Capable of 4K Ultra gaming and advanced rendering.

4K 60+ FPSVR ReadyRay Tracing

System Balance Analysis

CPU vs GPU performance ratio

Well Balanced

CPU

88%

GPU

95%

PROCESSOR

AMD Ryzen AI 5 435

28,128 Benchmark Score

Top 12% Market Ranking

View Full Specs →

GRAPHICS CARD

NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Mobile

38,135 Benchmark Score

Top 5% Market Ranking

View Full Specs →

Market Position

How your build compares to others

Budget

0-30

Mid-Range

30-60

High-End

60-85

Enthusiast

85-100

Your Build

Game Performance Benchmarks

Real-world 4K FPS in popular titles

View All Games →

Performance Insights

Tips to maximize your system

Optimal Performance

Your system is in the top tier. You can run any modern game at maximum settings.

4K Gaming Ready

Consider a 4K 144Hz monitor to fully utilize your hardware capabilities.

Compatible Games See what you can play Compare CPUs Find upgrades Compare GPUs Find upgrades

Performance Tiers Explained

90-100

Ultimate

4K Ultra gaming, VR ready, ray tracing enabled, professional workloads

4K 60+ FPS VR Ready

70-89

High-End

1440p Ultra or 4K High settings, excellent for modern AAA titles

1440p Ultra 4K High

50-69

Mid-Range

1080p Ultra or 1440p Medium, great value for most gamers

1080p Ultra 1440p Med

30-49

Entry Level

1080p Medium settings, suitable for eSports and older titles

1080p Med eSports

0-29

Legacy

Basic gaming, older titles, consider upgrading for modern games

720p-1080p Low Older Games

# AMD Ryzen AI 5 435 + NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Mobile

This pairing combines a 6-core Zen 5 mobile processor with a high-end Ada Lovelace laptop GPU, placing the system in the 81st percentile overall. The CPU sits at the 80th percentile against all processors, while the GPU holds the 81st percentile against all graphics cards, indicating a well-matched duo where neither component dramatically overshadows the other. The data in this analysis is drawn entirely from synthetic benchmark scores, as no measured frame-rate data exists for this exact combination.

Usage Scenarios

High-refresh gaming: The RTX 4080 Mobile's PassMark G3D score of 24926 places it in the 81st percentile of all GPUs, indicating strong rasterization performance capable of driving high frame rates. The CPU's single-thread score of 1816 in Cinebench R23 and 3734 in PassMark single-thread tests suggest sufficient per-core performance to feed the GPU in most gaming scenarios. For esports titles at lower graphical settings, the combination should comfortably sustain high refresh rates, though the absence of measured FPS data means these are projections from benchmark scores.

Streaming: The GPU's 232 tensor cores and 58 RT cores provide dedicated hardware for encoding and AI-enhanced features. The CPU's PassMark multithread score of 19000 indicates adequate parallel processing headroom for simultaneous gaming and encoding workloads. The 12 threads from 6 cores handle the overhead of streaming software while the GPU's NVENC-class hardware offloads the heavy encoding work, a division of labor that the benchmark data supports.

Video editing: The GPU's 432.0 GB/s memory bandwidth and 24.72 TFLOPS FP32 performance provide substantial compute for timeline rendering and effects processing. The CPU's Cinebench R23 multicore score of 11333 (80th percentile) handles codec-heavy tasks and timeline scrubbing, while the 12 GB GDDR6 VRAM accommodates large preview buffers and multi-layer compositions. The PassMark GPU compute score of 11191 reinforces the GPU's capability for accelerated effects and color grading.

3D rendering: The GPU's 7424 shading units and 80 ROPs deliver strong rasterization and compute throughput for viewport interaction. The CPU's Cinebench R15 multicore score of 1686 and R23 multicore score of 11333 support CPU-based rendering fallbacks, though GPU-accelerated renderers will dominate. The combination of 6 Zen 5 cores and this GPU class is suitable for moderate rendering workloads, with the 81st percentile GPU ranking indicating solid performance relative to the broader market.

Software development: The CPU's PassMark data compression score of 225374 and encryption score of 11110 indicate strong throughput for build tools, compression tasks, and cryptographic operations. The 12 threads handle parallel compilation reasonably well, with the 80th percentile CPU ranking placing it above most mainstream mobile processors. The 89.6 GB/s memory bandwidth supports large in-memory datasets during development and testing.

Student and office work: The CPU's PassMark single-thread score of 3734 and physics score of 1075 indicate responsive everyday computing. The integrated Radeon 840M GPU provides a fallback for display output when the discrete GPU is idle, potentially extending battery life during light workloads. The 28 W TDP for the CPU suggests efficient operation for prolonged productivity sessions, while the entire package remains within a laptop form factor.

Benchmark Performance

The CPU achieves an average benchmark score of 28128, placing it in the 80th percentile against all processors. Its nearest rival, the Intel Core i5-13490F, scores 28185, a delta of -0.2%, meaning the AMD chip trails by a negligible margin. The Intel Core i5-14500T scores 28065 (0.2% ahead of the AMD), and the AMD Ryzen 5 PRO 8500GE scores 28054 (0.3% ahead). This clustering within a 0.5% band indicates the Ryzen AI 5 435 performs essentially identically to these desktop-class rivals, an impressive result for a 28 W mobile part.

The GPU posts an average benchmark score of 38135, placing it in the 81st percentile against all GPUs. Its nearest rival, the NVIDIA GeForce MX570, scores 38299 (0.4% ahead), while the RTX 5080 Mobile scores 38349 (0.6% ahead). The RTX 4070 desktop scores 37648 (1.3% behind), and the Tesla P4 scores 37628 (1.3% behind). The GPU's performance sits within a narrow band of these competitors, with the 4080 Mobile effectively matching the RTX 4070 desktop while trailing the newer 5080 Mobile by less than 1%.

The combined system percentile of 81 reflects a balanced configuration where both CPU and GPU land in the same performance tier. The CPU's Cinebench R23 scores of 1816 single-core and 11333 multi-core demonstrate strong single-threaded performance for a mobile part, while the GPU's 24926 PassMark G3D score indicates high-end rasterization capability. Together, these scores paint a picture of a system that excels in both CPU-bound and GPU-bound workloads without a clear weak point.

Balance and Bottleneck

The CPU and GPU percentiles (80 and 81, respectively) are nearly identical, suggesting a well-balanced pairing where neither component consistently limits the other. The CPU's average benchmark score of 28128 versus the GPU's 38135 indicates the GPU has roughly 35% more raw compute headroom, but these metrics measure different workloads and cannot be directly compared for bottleneck analysis.

In CPU-bound scenarios, such as physics simulations or data compression, the CPU's PassMark physics score of 1075 and multithread score of 19000 indicate the processor handles these tasks adequately. The CPU's 80th percentile ranking places it above most mobile processors, reducing the likelihood of it bottlenecking the GPU in gaming scenarios where frame rates are typically GPU-limited at higher resolutions.

In GPU-bound workloads, such as 4K gaming or GPU rendering, the RTX 4080 Mobile's 81st percentile ranking ensures it remains the primary performance driver. The GPU's 432.0 GB/s memory bandwidth and 24.72 TFLOPS FP32 throughput are substantial for a mobile part, and the 12 GB VRAM capacity prevents memory-related bottlenecks in most modern titles. The lack of measured FPS data means precise bottleneck quantification is impossible, but the balanced percentiles suggest a harmonious pairing.

The 89.6 GB/s CPU memory bandwidth is modest compared to the GPU's 432.0 GB/s, but this is typical for mobile platforms where the CPU and GPU share system memory allocation. The CPU's dual-channel DDR5/LPDDR5X support provides adequate bandwidth for its 6 cores, while the GPU's dedicated GDDR6 VRAM operates independently, minimizing contention.

Who Should Build It

Gamers at 1080p and 1440p: The RTX 4080 Mobile's 81st percentile ranking indicates strong performance at mainstream resolutions. The CPU's 80th percentile single-thread performance (1816 in Cinebench R23) prevents significant frame pacing issues in CPU-bound titles. At 4K, the GPU becomes the clear limiting factor, but its 12 GB VRAM and 432.0 GB/s bandwidth still deliver playable framerates in most titles.

Content creators: Video editors and 3D artists benefit from the GPU's 24.72 TFLOPS FP32 compute and 58 RT cores for accelerated rendering. The CPU's multicore score of 11333 in Cinebench R23 handles proxy generation and export tasks competently. The 12 GB VRAM supports large textures and complex scenes without spilling to system memory.

Software developers: The CPU's data encryption score of 11110 and extended instructions score of 16197 indicate strong cryptographic and SIMD performance for build pipelines and scientific computing. The 12 threads enable parallel compilation, while the 80th percentile CPU ranking ensures responsiveness during interactive development.

Students and small business workstations: The 28 W CPU TDP contributes to efficient operation in a laptop form factor. The integrated Radeon 840M GPU provides display output for office tasks while the discrete GPU remains idle, and the combined 81st percentile system ranking ensures this laptop handles any productivity workload without strain.

Upgrade Path and Platform

The CPU uses AMD Socket FP8, a mobile-specific socket, meaning upgrades are limited to other FP8 processors within the Ryzen AI 400 generation. The platform supports DDR5 and LPDDR5X memory with dual-channel configuration and 89.6 GB/s bandwidth, providing a modern memory baseline. PCIe Gen 4 with 14 CPU lanes offers adequate bandwidth for the GPU (PCIe 4.0 x16) and one or two NVMe SSDs.

The GPU has a 110 W TDP and no power connectors (portable device dependent), meaning it draws power through the motherboard rather than external connectors. The suggested PSU field is null, so power supply requirements are not specified in the data. However, the CPU's 28 W TDP and GPU's 110 W TDP suggest a total system draw that a typical laptop power brick can handle.

A sensible next upgrade would be a newer GPU generation, as the successor to this GPU (GeForce 50 Mobile) is already available and the RTX 5080 Mobile scores 0.6% higher in the benchmark database. However, mobile GPUs are typically soldered and not user-upgradable, so a full laptop replacement may be the practical path. On the CPU side, a higher-core-count FP8 processor from the same generation would be the only viable swap within this socket.

FAQ

Q: How does this CPU compare to its nearest rival?

A: The AMD Ryzen AI 5 435 has an average benchmark score of 28128, which is 0.2% behind the Intel Core i5-13490F (28185), 0.2% ahead of the Intel Core i5-14500T (28065), and 0.3% ahead of the AMD Ryzen 5 PRO 8500GE (28054). These differences are within the margin of error.

Q: What is the GPU's performance percentile?

A: The RTX 4080 Mobile sits in the 81st percentile against all GPUs with an average benchmark score of 38135, placing it above the RTX 4070 desktop (37648, 1.3% behind) and just below the RTX 5080 Mobile (38349, 0.6% ahead).

Q: Does this system support ECC memory?

A: Yes, the CPU supports ECC memory, which is unusual for a mobile processor and beneficial for workstation-class reliability in scientific or financial computing.

Q: What is the CPU's memory bandwidth?

A: The CPU supports dual-channel DDR5 or LPDDR5X memory with a bandwidth of 89.6 GB/s, which is typical for a mobile 6-core processor.

Q: How many RT and tensor cores does the GPU have?

A: The RTX 4080 Mobile has 58 RT cores and 232 tensor cores, enabling hardware-accelerated ray tracing and AI-based features like DLSS.

Q: What is the CPU's architecture and process node?

A: The CPU uses the Zen 5 architecture (codenamed Gorgon Point) on a 4 nm TSMC process, while the GPU uses Ada Lovelace on a 5 nm TSMC process.

Q: Is measured FPS data available for this build?

A: No, the FACT PACK contains no measured frame-rate data for this exact CPU+GPU combination. All gaming performance discussion is estimated from synthetic benchmark scores.

GPU Analysis

The RTX 4080 Mobile is built on the AD104 chip with 35,800 million transistors on a 294 mm² die, manufactured on TSMC's 5 nm process. It features 7424 shading units, 232 TMUs, and 80 ROPs, delivering a pixel rate of 133.2 GPixel/s and a texture rate of 386.3 GTexel/s. The 58 RT cores and 232 tensor cores provide dedicated hardware for ray tracing and AI workloads, respectively.

The GPU's memory subsystem consists of 12 GB of GDDR6 on a 192-bit bus, yielding 432.0 GB/s of bandwidth. The memory clock runs at 2250 MHz (18 Gbps effective). This configuration is well-suited for 1440p gaming and moderate 4K workloads, where the 12 GB capacity prevents VRAM exhaustion in most titles.

In synthetic benchmarks, the GPU achieves a PassMark G3D score of 24926 (81st percentile) and a GPU compute score of 11191. The Geekbench OpenCL score of 159575 and Vulkan score of 145807 indicate strong compute and graphics API performance. The FP32 throughput of 24.72 TFLOPS (with FP16 at a 1:1 ratio) positions this GPU for serious compute tasks, though the 110 W TDP limits sustained performance compared to desktop equivalents.

The GPU's nearest rival is the MX570 (0.4% ahead in average score), which is surprising given the MX570 is a low-end part; this likely reflects the benchmark database's averaging methodology. More meaningful comparisons include the RTX 5080 Mobile (0.6% ahead) and RTX 4070 desktop (1.3% behind), showing this mobile GPU performs within a few percent of the previous-generation desktop mid-range.

Build Overview

This is a laptop-class build (buildClass: "laptop") combining the AMD Ryzen AI 5 435 CPU with the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Mobile GPU. The system holds an 81st percentile combined ranking, indicating it outperforms roughly 81% of all tracked systems. The CPU's 80th percentile and GPU's 81st percentile are closely aligned, making this a balanced configuration without a dominant bottleneck.

The CPU is a 6-core, 12-thread Zen 5 processor (codenamed Gorgon Point) from the Ryzen AI 400 generation, running at 2.00 GHz base and 4.50 GHz boost with a 28 W TDP. The GPU is an Ada Lovelace-based RTX 4080 Mobile with 12 GB GDDR6, 110 W TDP, and 24.72 TFLOPS FP32 compute. Together, they form a high-performance laptop platform suitable for gaming, content creation, and development work.

The overall tier from the percentiles is upper-midrange to high-end: the 81st percentile combined ranking places this system above most laptops and desktops in the database, though it trails the very top configurations. The balanced CPU/GPU pairing means neither component is a weak link, and the modern architecture (Zen 5 CPU, Ada Lovelace GPU) ensures support for current software features.

CPU Analysis

The AMD Ryzen AI 5 435 is a 6-core, 12-thread mobile processor based on the Zen 5 architecture (codenamed Gorgon Point), manufactured on TSMC's 4 nm process. It operates at 2.00 GHz base with a 4.50 GHz boost clock and a 28 W TDP, making it a power-efficient part suitable for thin-and-light laptops. The CPU supports dual-channel DDR5 and LPDDR5X memory with 89.6 GB/s bandwidth and includes ECC memory support, a feature typically reserved for workstation parts.

The cache hierarchy consists of 80 KB L1 per core, 1 MB L2 per core, and 4 MB shared L3. The CPU uses AMD Socket FP8 and provides 14 PCIe Gen 4 lanes. It includes integrated Radeon 840M graphics, allowing basic display output without the discrete GPU. The CPU is not multiplier-unlocked, so overclocking is not supported.

In Cinebench R15, the CPU scores 1686 multicore and 260 single-core; in R23, it scores 11333 multicore and 1816 single-core. PassMark tests show a multithread score of 19000, single-thread score of 3734, and physics score of 1075. The data compression score of 225374 and encryption score of 11110 indicate strong throughput for compression and cryptographic workloads. The extended instructions score of 16197 and floating-point math score of 40627 demonstrate solid SIMD and FP performance.

The CPU's average benchmark score of 28128 places it in the 80th percentile, essentially tied with the Intel Core i5-13490F (-0.2% delta) and slightly ahead of the Core i5-14500T (+0.2%) and Ryzen 5 PRO 8500GE (+0.3%). This performance level is remarkable for a 28 W mobile part, matching desktop-class processors with higher TDPs.

Gaming Performance

No measured FPS data exists for this exact CPU+GPU combination in the FACT PACK. The measuredFpsUltraByGame field is empty, and dataIsMeasured is false. Consequently, all gaming performance figures presented here are estimates derived from the synthetic benchmark scores, not from actual frame-rate measurements.

Based on the GPU's PassMark G3D score of 24926 (81st percentile) and the CPU's single-thread performance (1816 in Cinebench R23, 3734 in PassMark), this system is expected to deliver high frame rates at 1080p and 1440p in most titles. The GPU's 12 GB VRAM and 432.0 GB/s bandwidth support high-resolution textures and modern rendering techniques. The 58 RT cores enable hardware ray tracing, though enabling RT features will reduce frame rates compared to rasterized rendering.

At 1080p, the GPU is likely to be the limiting factor in most titles, with the CPU's 80th percentile single-thread performance providing adequate headroom. At 1440p, the GPU's workload increases, and the system should still maintain playable frame rates in demanding titles. At 4K, the GPU's 81st percentile ranking suggests moderate performance, with users likely needing to adjust settings for demanding games.

Esports titles and older games should run at very high frame rates given the GPU's raw throughput. AAA titles at high settings should achieve smooth performance at 1080p and 1440p. The absence of measured FPS data means these are projections, and actual performance may vary based on specific game optimizations, driver maturity, and thermal constraints within the laptop chassis.

Rate My PC: AMD Ryzen AI 5 435 + NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Mobile

Apex Performer

System Balance Analysis

AMD Ryzen AI 5 435

NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Mobile

Market Position

Game Performance Benchmarks

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

Performance Insights

Optimal Performance

4K Gaming Ready

Performance Tiers Explained

Ultimate

High-End

Mid-Range

Entry Level

Legacy

Usage Scenarios

Benchmark Performance

Balance and Bottleneck

Who Should Build It

Upgrade Path and Platform

FAQ

GPU Analysis

Build Overview

CPU Analysis

Gaming Performance

4K Gaming Performance

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

1440p Gaming Performance

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

1080p Gaming Performance

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

Related Processors

Related Graphics Cards

Compare Your CPU

Compare Your GPU

Related PC Builds

Same CPU with Different GPUs

Same GPU with Different CPUs

Other Popular Builds