SYSTEM ANALYZER

Rate My PC: AMD Ryzen 9 9955HX3D + NVIDIA Quadro RTX 5000 Mobile

Get a comprehensive performance analysis of your gaming rig with detailed benchmarks, bottleneck detection, and upgrade recommendations

86 / 100
HIGH-END

Power Build

Top 14% of systems. Excellent for 1440p Ultra or 4K High gaming.

1440p Ultra4K High

System Balance Analysis

CPU vs GPU performance ratio
GPU Bottleneck
CPU
98%
VS
GPU
74%

Your GPU is limiting system performance. Consider upgrading to a more powerful graphics card to better utilize your CPU.

PROCESSOR

AMD Ryzen 9 9955HX3D

97,453 Benchmark Score
Top 2% Market Ranking
View Full Specs →
GRAPHICS CARD

NVIDIA Quadro RTX 5000 Mobile

0 Benchmark Score
Top 26% Market Ranking
View Full Specs →

Market Position

How your build compares to others
Budget
0-30
Mid-Range
30-60
High-End
60-85
Enthusiast
85-100
Your Build

Game Performance Benchmarks

Real-world 4K FPS in popular titles
View All Games →

Performance Insights

Tips to maximize your system

Strong Performance

Excellent for 1440p gaming. Most games will run at high/ultra settings smoothly.

Bottleneck Detected

GPU Bottleneck - Upgrading the weaker component will improve overall performance.

Compatible Games See what you can play Compare CPUs Find upgrades Compare GPUs Find upgrades

Performance Tiers Explained

90-100

Ultimate

4K Ultra gaming, VR ready, ray tracing enabled, professional workloads

4K 60+ FPS VR Ready
70-89

High-End

1440p Ultra or 4K High settings, excellent for modern AAA titles

1440p Ultra 4K High
50-69

Mid-Range

1080p Ultra or 1440p Medium, great value for most gamers

1080p Ultra 1440p Med
30-49

Entry Level

1080p Medium settings, suitable for eSports and older titles

1080p Med eSports
0-29

Legacy

Basic gaming, older titles, consider upgrading for modern games

720p-1080p Low Older Games

The AMD Ryzen 9 9955HX3D and NVIDIA Quadro RTX 5000 Mobile pairing is an unusual blend of high-end mobile CPU technology and a workstation GPU from a previous generation. The data shows a processor that ranks in the 96th percentile among all CPUs, paired with a graphics card that sits at the 50th percentile among all GPUs. This disparity sets the stage for a system where the CPU is clearly the dominant component, and the GPU, while capable, likely limits performance in graphics-bound tasks.

Balance and Bottleneck

The benchmark results indicate a profound imbalance between the two primary components. The Ryzen 9 9955HX3D achieves an average benchmark score of 97453, placing it in the 96th percentile of all CPUs. In contrast, the Quadro RTX 5000 Mobile has an average benchmark score of 0, placing it in the 50th percentile of all GPUs. This suggests that in any workload that heavily relies on the GPU, the Quadro RTX 5000 Mobile will be the limiting factor, potentially holding back the immense processing power of the CPU.

For CPU-bound tasks, the data implies no such limitation. The processor’s multi-threaded performance is exceptional, with a Cinebench R23 multi-core score of 38161.5 and a single-core score of 2159.5. This indicates that the CPU can handle the most demanding computational workloads without breaking a sweat. The bottleneck analysis points to the GPU as the component that will cap performance in gaming and graphics-accelerated tasks. In such scenarios, the system's overall speed will be dictated by the GPU's capabilities, not the CPU's.

The absence of measured FPS data for this combination means that the exact scaling between CPU and GPU performance in games cannot be quantified. However, the percentile disparity strongly suggests that at lower resolutions, where the CPU does more work, the system may perform better than at higher resolutions where the GPU becomes the sole limiting factor. The CPU’s high single-thread score of 4511 in Passmark and 2159.5 in Cinebench R23 indicates it can feed frames quickly, but the GPU’s mid-tier percentile ranking will cap the final output. The system is therefore well-balanced for productivity and compute workloads, but not for high-end gaming where the GPU will be the clear bottleneck.

Upgrade Path and Platform

The Ryzen 9 9955HX3D is built on the AMD Socket FL1, a mobile platform. The CPU supports dual-channel DDR5 memory with a memory bandwidth of 89.6 GB/s, and it also supports ECC memory. The platform provides PCIe Gen 5 with 28 lanes from the CPU, which is a forward-looking feature that allows for high-speed storage and future expansion. The CPU has a TDP of 55 W, which is modest for a 16-core processor, and the GPU has a TDP of 110 W.

The upgrade path for this mobile platform is inherently limited compared to desktop systems. The CPU uses a 4 nm process from TSMC and is based on the Zen 5 architecture, codenamed Fire Range. The integrated graphics is a Radeon 610M, which provides a basic display output but is not for gaming. The GPU is an end-of-life product, which means that future driver support and performance improvements may be limited.

A sensible next upgrade for this system would focus on the GPU, as it is the weaker component. However, the laptop form factor means that the GPU is often soldered and not user-upgradeable. The data does not include a suggested PSU for the GPU, as it is an IGP (integrated graphics processor) type, meaning it is part of the laptop’s mainboard. The CPU’s low TDP of 55 W and the GPU’s 110 W TDP suggest that the total system power draw is manageable for a high-end laptop. The PCIe 3.0 x16 interface of the GPU is also a limiting factor, as it is a generation behind the CPU’s PCIe Gen 5 support. This means that the GPU cannot take full advantage of the CPU’s faster I/O capabilities, further reinforcing the GPU as the system’s primary constraint.

CPU Analysis

The AMD Ryzen 9 9955HX3D is a 16-core, 32-thread processor based on the Zen 5 architecture, built on a 4 nm process at TSMC. It features a base clock of 2.50 GHz and a boost clock of 5.40 GHz. The CPU has a substantial L3 cache of 128 MB, which is a key feature of the X3D line, designed to improve gaming and memory-sensitive workloads. The L1 cache is 80 KB per core, and the L2 cache is 1 MB per core.

The benchmark scores for this CPU are impressive. In Cinebench R23, it scores 38161.5 in multi-core and 2159.5 in single-core. This places it in the 96th percentile of all CPUs. The average benchmark score of 97453 is just 1.1% below the AMD Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5965WX, which scores 98504, and 1.4% above the AMD Ryzen 9 PRO 9945, which scores 96083. This indicates that the 9955HX3D performs at a level comparable to high-end desktop workstation processors.

The Passmark scores further illustrate its capabilities. The multi-thread score is 62674, and the single-thread score is 4511. The floating-point math score is 144122, and the integer math score is 222503. The data compression score is 785811, and the encryption score is 39446. These numbers suggest that the CPU excels in tasks that require heavy computation, such as video encoding, 3D rendering, and scientific simulations. The high single-thread performance also ensures that it handles everyday tasks and lightly-threaded applications with ease.

Usage Scenarios

High-Refresh Gaming: The CPU’s strong single-core performance, with a Cinebench R23 score of 2159.5 and a Passmark single-thread score of 4511, is well-suited for high-refresh gaming. However, the Quadro RTX 5000 Mobile’s 50th percentile ranking will likely be the limiting factor, preventing the system from achieving the highest frame rates in demanding titles at high resolutions. The estimated gaming performance would be moderate, with the CPU capable of feeding frames quickly but the GPU capping the output.

Streaming: The 16-core, 32-thread CPU is more than capable of handling game streaming and encoding simultaneously. The high multi-thread score of 38161.5 in Cinebench R23 indicates that there is ample headroom for encoding workloads without impacting game performance. The GPU’s lack of modern encoder hardware, given its Turing architecture, may limit the quality and efficiency of hardware encoding, but the CPU can compensate with software encoding.

Video Editing: Video editing software often benefits from both high single-thread and multi-thread performance. The CPU’s scores in Passmark, including a floating-point math score of 144122 and an integer math score of 222503, suggest that it can handle complex editing timelines and effects. The GPU’s 16 GB of GDDR6 memory and 448.0 GB/s bandwidth can assist with rendering and effects, but its older architecture may not be as efficient as newer GPUs.

3D Rendering: This is a workload where the CPU shines. The Cinebench R23 multi-core score of 38161.5 is a strong indicator of its ability to render 3D scenes. The CPU is only 1.1% slower than the AMD Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5965WX in average score, making it a high-end rendering performer. The GPU can also accelerate rendering in some engines, but its mid-tier percentile ranking suggests it will provide only moderate acceleration.

Software Development: The CPU’s high multi-thread and single-thread performance makes it ideal for compiling code, running virtual machines, and handling large codebases. The data encryption score of 39446 and extended instructions score of 62813 in Passmark indicate strong performance in security and cryptography-related tasks. The system can handle any development workload without issue.

Student and Office Work: For general productivity, office applications, web browsing, and document creation, the system is massively overqualified. The CPU’s single-thread performance ensures a responsive experience, while the low 55 W TDP means it can run efficiently on battery power. The integrated Radeon 610M graphics provide basic display output, but the discrete GPU is available for more demanding tasks.

FAQ

Q: What is the processor’s performance percentile among all CPUs?

A: The AMD Ryzen 9 9955HX3D is in the 96th percentile of all CPUs, with an average benchmark score of 97453.

Q: How does the CPU compare to the AMD Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5965WX?

A: The Ryzen 9 9955HX3D has an average score that is 1.1% lower than the Threadripper PRO 5965WX, which has an average score of 98504.

Q: What is the GPU’s performance percentile among all GPUs?

A: The NVIDIA Quadro RTX 5000 Mobile is in the 50th percentile of all GPUs, with an average benchmark score of 0.

Q: What is the CPU’s base and boost clock speed?

A: The CPU has a base clock of 2.50 GHz and a boost clock of 5.40 GHz.

Q: How much L3 cache does the CPU have?

A: The CPU has a total L3 cache of 128 MB.

Q: What is the GPU’s memory size and type?

A: The GPU has 16 GB of GDDR6 memory with a 256-bit bus width and a bandwidth of 448.0 GB/s.

Q: What is the combined percentile of this CPU and GPU pairing?

A: The combined percentile for this build is 73.

Gaming Performance

The FACT PACK contains no measured FPS data for this exact CPU and GPU combination. Therefore, all frame rate discussions are estimated from the benchmark scores and should be treated as approximations. The CPU’s high single-thread performance, with a Passmark score of 4511, suggests it can handle the game logic and physics calculations quickly. The GPU’s 50th percentile ranking indicates it will provide mid-tier gaming performance.

For esports titles and older games at 1080p, the system is estimated to deliver high frame rates, as the CPU’s strong single-core performance will not be a bottleneck. However, for the latest AAA games at higher resolutions like 1440p or 4K, the GPU will become the limiting factor. The Quadro RTX 5000 Mobile’s 16 GB of VRAM is ample for most titles, but its Turing architecture and 9.400 TFLOPS of FP32 performance are modest by modern standards. The GPU’s 48 RT cores and 384 tensor cores provide some support for ray tracing and DLSS, but its performance in these features will be lower than newer GPUs. The system is estimated to be capable of playing most games at medium to high settings at 1080p, with lower settings required for demanding titles.

Who Should Build It

This system is targeted at users who prioritize CPU performance above all else. It is an ideal choice for professionals who work with 3D rendering, video editing, software development, and complex data analysis, where the 16-core, 32-thread CPU’s 96th percentile performance is a major asset. The Cinebench R23 multi-core score of 38161.5 indicates that it can handle the heaviest rendering workloads, making it suitable for engineers, architects, and content creators.

For gamers, the system is less well-suited, as the GPU’s 50th percentile ranking will limit performance in modern titles. It may appeal to those who play less demanding games or who prioritize CPU-intensive simulations and strategy games. The system is also a strong fit for students and professionals in STEM fields who need a powerful mobile workstation for computations and simulations. Small business workstations that require heavy number-crunching, such as financial modeling or scientific research, would also benefit from this CPU’s capabilities. However, the end-of-life status of the GPU means that it is not a future-proof choice for graphics-intensive applications.

Build Overview

This build pairs the AMD Ryzen 9 9955HX3D, a 16-core mobile processor from the 9000 series, with the NVIDIA Quadro RTX 5000 Mobile, a Turing-architecture laptop GPU. The build class is a laptop. The CPU is a high-end mobile processor using the Zen 5 architecture and is designed for maximum performance in a portable form factor. The GPU is a workstation-oriented part, now end-of-life, designed for professional applications such as CAD and 3D modeling.

The combined percentile for this pairing is 73, which places it in the upper-middle tier of all systems. The CPU’s 96th percentile ranking is the primary driver of this score, while the GPU’s 50th percentile ranking pulls it down. This is a system with exceptional processing power but moderate graphics capability. It occupies a unique niche as a mobile workstation that can handle the most demanding CPU workloads but is not a top-tier gaming machine. The CPU’s launch MSRP is not listed in the data.

Benchmark Performance

The AMD Ryzen 9 9955HX3D shows outstanding performance in CPU benchmarks. Its Cinebench R23 multi-core score is 38161.5, and its single-core score is 2159.5. In Cinebench R15, it scores 6042.5 in multi-core and 332 in single-core. The Passmark multi-thread score is 62674, and the single-thread score is 4511. The CPU’s percentile vs all CPUs is 96, and its average benchmark score is 97453. It is 1.1% behind the AMD Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5965WX, which has an average score of 98504, and 1.4% ahead of the AMD Ryzen 9 PRO 9945, which scores 96083.

The NVIDIA Quadro RTX 5000 Mobile has no benchmark scores listed in the FACT PACK, and its average benchmark score is 0. Its percentile vs all GPUs is 50. The GPU has no nearest rivals listed. The combined picture is one of a system with a top-tier CPU and a mid-tier GPU. The CPU’s performance is comparable to high-end desktop workstation processors, while the GPU’s performance, based on its percentile, is average. This means that the system will excel in CPU-bound tasks but will be average in GPU-bound tasks.

GPU Analysis

The NVIDIA Quadro RTX 5000 Mobile is based on the TU104 chip and uses the Turing architecture, built on a 12 nm process. It has 3072 shading units, 192 texture mapping units, and 64 render output units. The GPU has 48 RT cores for ray tracing and 384 tensor cores for AI processing. It includes 16 GB of GDDR6 memory on a 256-bit bus, providing a bandwidth of 448.0 GB/s. The base clock is 1035 MHz, and the boost clock is 1530 MHz.

The GPU’s FP32 performance is 9.400 TFLOPS, and its FP16 performance is 18.80 TFLOPS with a 2:1 ratio. The pixel rate is 97.92 GPixel/s, and the texture rate is 293.8 GTexel/s. It has a TDP of 110 W and is an IGP, meaning it is integrated into the laptop’s motherboard. The GPU has a 50th percentile ranking, indicating that its performance is average compared to all GPUs. It supports DirectX 12 Ultimate, OpenGL 4.6, and Vulkan 1.4. The GPU is an end-of-life product. Its memory capacity of 16 GB is generous for professional applications, but its overall compute performance is modest by modern standards, which is reflected in its mid-tier percentile ranking. It was released in 2019 and is a predecessor to the Ampere-MW series.