SYSTEM ANALYZER

Rate My PC: AMD Ryzen 9 9955HX3D + NVIDIA Quadro RTX 3000 Mobile Refresh

Get a comprehensive performance analysis of your gaming rig with detailed benchmarks, bottleneck detection, and upgrade recommendations

86 / 100
HIGH-END

Power Build

Top 14% of systems. Excellent for 1440p Ultra or 4K High gaming.

1440p Ultra4K High

System Balance Analysis

CPU vs GPU performance ratio
GPU Bottleneck
CPU
98%
VS
GPU
74%

Your GPU is limiting system performance. Consider upgrading to a more powerful graphics card to better utilize your CPU.

PROCESSOR

AMD Ryzen 9 9955HX3D

97,453 Benchmark Score
Top 2% Market Ranking
View Full Specs →
GRAPHICS CARD

NVIDIA Quadro RTX 3000 Mobile Refresh

0 Benchmark Score
Top 26% Market Ranking
View Full Specs →

Market Position

How your build compares to others
Budget
0-30
Mid-Range
30-60
High-End
60-85
Enthusiast
85-100
Your Build

Game Performance Benchmarks

Real-world 4K FPS in popular titles
View All Games →

Performance Insights

Tips to maximize your system

Strong Performance

Excellent for 1440p gaming. Most games will run at high/ultra settings smoothly.

Bottleneck Detected

GPU Bottleneck - Upgrading the weaker component will improve overall performance.

Compatible Games See what you can play Compare CPUs Find upgrades Compare GPUs Find upgrades

Performance Tiers Explained

90-100

Ultimate

4K Ultra gaming, VR ready, ray tracing enabled, professional workloads

4K 60+ FPS VR Ready
70-89

High-End

1440p Ultra or 4K High settings, excellent for modern AAA titles

1440p Ultra 4K High
50-69

Mid-Range

1080p Ultra or 1440p Medium, great value for most gamers

1080p Ultra 1440p Med
30-49

Entry Level

1080p Medium settings, suitable for eSports and older titles

1080p Med eSports
0-29

Legacy

Basic gaming, older titles, consider upgrading for modern games

720p-1080p Low Older Games

# AMD Ryzen 9 9955HX3D + NVIDIA Quadro RTX 3000 Mobile Refresh

This pairing combines AMD's top-tier 16-core Zen 5 mobile processor with NVIDIA's Turing-based professional mobile GPU, creating a laptop configuration that ranks in the 73rd percentile overall among all tested builds. The CPU is an absolute powerhouse — sitting in the 96th percentile of all CPUs — while the GPU lands exactly at the 50th percentile, making this a heavily CPU-dominated system where processor-bound workloads will shine far more than graphics-intensive tasks.

Usage Scenarios

High-refresh gaming: At 1080p and 1440p, the CPU's exceptional single-thread score of 2159.5 in Cinebench R23 and 4511 in Passmark single-thread tests ensures that frame pacing and physics calculations will rarely bottleneck. However, the Quadro RTX 3000 Mobile Refresh's 50th percentile GPU ranking means 240Hz displays will only be reachable in esports titles with reduced settings; for AAA games, expect more modest refresh rates.

Streaming: The 16-core/32-thread configuration with a Passmark multithread score of 62674 provides ample headroom for simultaneous game capture, encoding, and broadcasting. The CPU's 96th percentile ranking means software encoding will not compete with game performance, though the GPU's Turing architecture lacks the dedicated encoder efficiency of newer generations.

Video editing: Cinebench R23 multicore score of 38161.5 places this CPU within 1.1% of the AMD Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5965WX (which scores 98504 on average), indicating timeline scrubbing and export rendering will be exceptionally fast. The GPU's 6 GB VRAM and 336.0 GB/s bandwidth handle 1080p and light 4K editing timelines, though longer 4K projects may strain memory capacity.

3D rendering: The Passmark floating-point math score of 144122 and integer math score of 222503 demonstrate strong compute throughput for CPU-based rendering engines. GPU-accelerated rendering in Blender or Octane will be limited by the Quadro's 5.299 TFLOPS FP32 performance, which sits at the 50th percentile — adequate for preview renders but not for final frame production at high sample counts.

Software development: The 96th percentile CPU ranking, combined with 785811 in Passmark data compression and 39446 in data encryption, makes this ideal for large codebase compilation, container builds, and cryptographic operations. The 32 threads handle parallel builds effortlessly, while the generous L3 cache of 128 MB reduces recompilation times for dependency-heavy projects.

Student and office work: This configuration is massively overprovisioned for document processing, spreadsheet analysis, and web browsing. The CPU's 96th percentile means zero perceptible lag even with dozens of browser tabs and background productivity apps, though the 55W TDP suggests a laptop that requires active cooling and a substantial battery.

Benchmark Performance

The AMD Ryzen 9 9955HX3D achieves an average benchmark score of 97453, placing it in the 96th percentile of all CPUs. Its nearest rival, the AMD Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5965WX, scores 98504 — a mere 1.1% advantage — while the AMD Ryzen 9 PRO 9945 trails by 1.4% with a score of 96083. The AMD EPYC 4565P and EPYC 9175F sit 1.8% and 1.9% behind respectively with scores of 95764 and 95615.

The NVIDIA Quadro RTX 3000 Mobile Refresh holds a 50th percentile position among all GPUs with no benchmark scores recorded in the data, meaning its relative performance is inferred from its specifications rather than direct measurements. The combined percentile for this pairing is 73, reflecting the stark contrast between a top-tier CPU and a mid-range GPU.

Cinebench results show a multicore score of 38161.5 (R23) and 6042.5 (R15), with single-core scores of 2159.5 and 332 respectively. Passmark tests reveal a multithread score of 62674, single-thread score of 4511, and strong results in specialized workloads: floating-point math at 144122, integer math at 222503, extended instructions at 62813, prime number finding at 525, random string sorting at 83497, data compression at 785811, data encryption at 39446, and physics at 4687.

CPU Analysis

The Ryzen 9 9955HX3D is built on TSMC's 4 nm process with Zen 5 architecture, codenamed Fire Range, packing 16 cores and 32 threads. The transistor count of 16,630 million across a dual-die configuration (2x 70.6 mm²) represents a dense, modern design. Base clock is 2.50 GHz with a boost clock of 5.40 GHz, and the multiplier is unlocked for enthusiast tuning.

Cache hierarchy is substantial: 80 KB L1 per core, 1 MB L2 per core, and a massive 128 MB L3 cache. This large L3 is critical for gaming and database workloads where repeated data access benefits from on-die storage. The 89.6 GB/s dual-channel DDR5 memory bandwidth, while not exceptional, is sufficient given the cache size.

The 55W TDP is remarkably low for a 16-core part, indicating excellent power efficiency from the 4 nm process. This allows the CPU to sustain high boost clocks without excessive thermal load, though sustained all-core workloads may still require aggressive cooling in a laptop chassis. The integrated Radeon 610M graphics provide basic display output when the discrete GPU is idle.

Passmark single-thread score of 4511 places this among the fastest mobile processors ever tested, while the multithread score of 62674 demonstrates that all 32 threads scale nearly linearly. The data compression score of 785811 is particularly notable, suggesting exceptional memory subsystem performance for archival and backup tasks.

Gaming Performance

No measured FPS data exists for this exact CPU+GPU combination — the fact pack contains no measuredFps entries, and all frame rate discussions below are estimates derived from the benchmark scores. The CPU's 96th percentile ranking and the GPU's 50th percentile position suggest that gaming performance will be constrained almost entirely by the graphics card.

At 1080p with ultra settings, the Quadro RTX 3000 Mobile Refresh's 5.299 TFLOPS FP32 throughput and 6 GB GDDR6 memory should deliver playable frame rates in most titles from the last few years, likely ranging from 60-100 FPS in optimized esports games and 40-60 FPS in demanding AAA releases. The 192-bit memory bus with 336.0 GB/s bandwidth is adequate for 1080p textures but may show stutter in games requiring more than 6 GB VRAM.

At 1440p, expect a 20-30% reduction from 1080p figures, with many AAA titles dropping to 30-50 FPS on ultra settings. The 50th percentile GPU ranking means this is a mainstream-level gaming experience — not competitive with dedicated gaming GPUs but sufficient for casual play. At 4K, only older or well-optimized titles will remain playable, and even then, medium settings may be necessary.

The CPU's 128 MB L3 cache and 5.40 GHz boost clock ensure that even in CPU-heavy scenes — large battles, open worlds with many NPCs, physics simulations — frame times remain consistent. Minimum frame rates will be governed by the GPU, but the CPU will not introduce hitches in most scenarios.

Upgrade Path and Platform

The CPU uses AMD Socket FL1, which is specific to this mobile platform, and supports dual-channel DDR5 memory with ECC capability. PCIe Gen 5 with 28 CPU lanes provides ample bandwidth for the fastest NVMe SSDs and future expansion, though the GPU itself connects via PCIe 3.0 x16, creating a bandwidth mismatch that may slightly limit data transfer in VRAM-heavy workloads.

The GPU is an MXM module with no external power connectors, drawing up to 80W. The CPU's 55W TDP combined with the GPU's 80W TDP totals approximately 135W for the core compute components, which is modest for a laptop of this class. There is no suggested PSU figure in the data, but this configuration should be within the capabilities of most high-end laptop power adapters.

A sensible next upgrade would focus on the GPU, as the CPU has substantial headroom. Replacing the Quadro RTX 3000 Mobile Refresh with a newer, higher-performing MXM module would better balance the system, provided the laptop's cooling and power delivery can accommodate a higher-TDP card. The CPU's 96th percentile ranking means it will remain relevant for several generations, making it the component to keep.

Memory upgrades to higher-capacity DDR5 modules would benefit memory-intensive workloads like virtualization and large dataset processing, while the 89.6 GB/s bandwidth remains a potential bottleneck for some server-style workloads despite the generous L3 cache.

GPU Analysis

The NVIDIA Quadro RTX 3000 Mobile Refresh is built on the 12 nm Turing architecture (TU106 chip) from TSMC, containing 10,800 million transistors on a 445 mm² die. Base clock is 945 MHz with a boost clock of 1380 MHz, and memory runs at 1750 MHz with 14 Gbps effective data rate. The 6 GB GDDR6 memory on a 192-bit bus delivers 336.0 GB/s of bandwidth.

Compute resources include 1920 shading units, 120 texture mapping units, 64 ROPs, 30 ray tracing cores, and 240 tensor cores. The FP32 throughput of 5.299 TFLOPS and FP16 of 10.60 TFLOPS (2:1 ratio) place this GPU in the mainstream segment — the 50th percentile ranking confirms mid-pack performance. Pixel rate is 88.32 GPixel/s and texture rate is 165.6 GTexel/s.

For rendering workloads, the 30 RT cores provide hardware-accelerated ray tracing, though the 5.299 TFLOPS FP32 performance limits ray tracing to lighter scenes or lower sample counts. The 240 tensor cores enable DLSS support, which can significantly boost frame rates in supported games by rendering at lower resolutions and upscaling. However, the 6 GB VRAM may be insufficient for high-resolution texture packs or complex 3D scenes.

The GPU supports DirectX 12 Ultimate (12_2), OpenGL 4.6, and Vulkan 1.4, ensuring compatibility with modern gaming and professional applications. The 12 nm process node means lower efficiency compared to the CPU's 4 nm node, but the 80W TDP keeps thermals manageable in a laptop chassis. The GPU is marked as end-of-life, with the Quadro Pascal-M as predecessor and Ampere-MW as successor.

Balance and Bottleneck

This system exhibits a pronounced CPU-favoring imbalance. The processor's 96th percentile versus the GPU's 50th percentile creates a 46-percentage-point gap, meaning the GPU will bottleneck in most graphics-intensive workloads. In gaming, frame rates will be limited by the Quadro's compute throughput and VRAM capacity, not the CPU's ability to feed frames.

Evidence from the benchmark scores supports this: the CPU's Cinebench R23 multicore score of 38161.5 is within 1.1% of a Threadripper PRO workstation processor, while the GPU's 5.299 TFLOPS FP32 is roughly half of what modern high-end laptop GPUs deliver. The Passmark physics score of 4687 further confirms CPU gaming headroom, as physics simulation rarely challenges this processor.

For CPU-bound workloads — software compilation, data compression (785811), encryption (39446), and multithreaded rendering — the system performs near the top of the desktop-class spectrum. The GPU becomes irrelevant in these tasks, and the CPU's 32 threads operate at near-peak efficiency. The 128 MB L3 cache minimizes memory traffic, reducing the impact of the 89.6 GB/s bandwidth limit.

In mixed workloads like video editing with GPU-accelerated effects, the bottleneck shifts depending on the specific operation. Timeline scrubbing and color grading rely on GPU compute, where the Quadro's 50th percentile ranking becomes evident, while export encoding leverages the CPU's strength. Users should expect a system that excels at compute-heavy tasks but delivers only average graphics performance.

FAQ

Q: How does the Ryzen 9 9955HX3D compare to the closest rival in multi-threaded workloads?

A: The CPU scores 97453 on average, which is 1.1% behind the AMD Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5965WX (98504) and 1.4% ahead of the AMD Ryzen 9 PRO 9945 (96083). This places it firmly in workstation-class territory despite being a mobile processor.

Q: Is the Quadro RTX 3000 Mobile Refresh suitable for gaming?

A: At the 50th percentile of all GPUs with 5.299 TFLOPS FP32 and 6 GB GDDR6, it can handle 1080p gaming at medium-to-high settings in most titles, but it is not designed for high-refresh or 4K gaming. The 30 RT cores and 240 tensor cores provide ray tracing and DLSS support.

Q: What memory bandwidth does this configuration provide?

A: The CPU supports dual-channel DDR5 with 89.6 GB/s bandwidth, while the GPU has its own 336.0 GB/s GDDR6 memory on a 192-bit bus. The CPU's large 128 MB L3 cache helps compensate for the relatively modest system memory bandwidth.

Q: Can this laptop handle 3D rendering workloads?

A: Yes, particularly CPU-based rendering, given the 38161.5 Cinebench R23 multicore score and 144122 Passmark floating-point math score. GPU-accelerated rendering will be limited by the Quadro's 5.299 TFLOPS and 6 GB VRAM, making it suitable for previews rather than final production renders.

Q: What is the thermal and power profile?

A: The CPU has a 55W TDP while the GPU draws 80W, totaling approximately 135W for compute components. The CPU's 4 nm process enables high efficiency, but sustained loads will require robust laptop cooling.

Q: Is this configuration good for software development?

A: Excellent. The 16-core/32-thread CPU with 128 MB L3 cache and 785811 Passmark data compression score accelerates compilation, container operations, and database queries. The 96th percentile CPU ranking ensures no computation bottlenecks.

Q: What upgrade would most improve this system?

A: Replacing the Quadro RTX 3000 Mobile Refresh with a higher-performing MXM GPU module would balance the system, as the CPU's 96th percentile ranking leaves substantial graphics headroom unused.

Who Should Build It

Gamers at 1080p who prioritize consistent frame times over maximum settings will find this capable, with the CPU ensuring no stutters while the GPU delivers mainstream frame rates. Those targeting 1440p or high-refresh 240Hz displays should look elsewhere, as the 50th percentile GPU cannot sustain those demands.

Content creators working with CPU-intensive workflows — video encoding, 3D scene rendering, large data processing — will benefit from the 38161.5 Cinebench R23 multicore score and 32 threads. The GPU's 6 GB VRAM supports moderate 1080p editing, but 4K timelines with heavy effects will struggle.

Software developers compiling large codebases, running containers, or processing data will find the 96th percentile CPU and 128 MB L3 cache transformative. The 39446 encryption score and 785811 compression score accelerate DevOps pipelines and data engineering tasks.

Students and office workers who also run simulation software, statistical analysis, or virtual machines will appreciate the CPU headroom, though this is overkill for basic productivity. The laptop form factor with this compute power suits engineering, finance, and research roles.

Small business workstations needing a single machine for CAD (CPU-based), light GPU rendering, and database work will find the balance acceptable, provided graphics requirements remain modest.

Build Overview

This is a laptop-class configuration pairing the AMD Ryzen 9 9955HX3D — a 16-core, 32-thread Zen 5 (Fire Range) processor on TSMC 4 nm with a 5.40 GHz boost clock and 128 MB L3 cache — with the NVIDIA Quadro RTX 3000 Mobile Refresh, a Turing-based professional GPU with 6 GB GDDR6 and 5.299 TFLOPS FP32 performance. The CPU's 96th percentile ranking and the GPU's 50th percentile position produce a combined percentile of 73, placing this system in the upper-mid range of all tested builds.

The configuration is optimized for CPU-bound workloads: software development, scientific computing, video encoding, and multitasking benefit from the processor's exceptional multithreaded performance, while gaming and GPU-accelerated rendering deliver only average results. The 55W CPU TDP and 80W GPU TDP make this a relatively efficient laptop platform, though the end-of-life GPU status and PCIe 3.0 interface suggest limited future-proofing on the graphics side. For users whose primary demand is maximum CPU compute in a portable form factor, this pairing delivers exceptional value — for those needing balanced gaming or GPU rendering, the graphics component will be the limiting factor.